Philips PUS7000 vs Haier M90E

Direct comparison

M90E

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

7.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    6.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    5.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.5

    7.8

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.8

    6.7

  • Watching in bright light

    3.5

    7.8

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    5.0

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    8.6

Advantages

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • HDR10+ support

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – will work well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with numeric keypad

  • High peak brightness in HDR (over 1000 nits)

  • Very high native contrast and deep black (VA panel)

  • Support for 144 Hz refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Very low input lag in mode (<10 ms)

  • Versatile USB media player

  • Good sound quality with noticeable bass

  • Support for dynamic HDR formats (Dolby Vision, HDR10+)

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works with infrared

  • Aggressive and unstable local dimming algorithm

  • Poor stability and errors in the operation of the Google TV system

  • Narrow viewing angles

  • Lack of font sharpness at 144 Hz refresh rate

  • Poor tone mapping in the standard HDR10 format

Our verdict

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it is essentially just the price. This model is meant to be primarily inexpensive, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally switch to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which significantly enhance the gaming experience when connected to a console, making everything quite responsive. But... well, the biggest problem with this TV is brightness, or rather, the lack of it. 200 nits is an output that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The image will be pale and unclear even though it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is basically just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary intensity, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price point, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically fall behind the rest of the budget screens. The only question is whether you can get along with the Titan OS, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard among competitors. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are flooding the market with QLEDs and Mini-LEDs, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you care about a well-known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you are looking for image quality… you’d better double-check your budget before purchasing.

Haier M90E is an ambitious attempt by the manufacturer to enter the higher segment of the market. "On paper," the specifications look impressive: Mini LED backlighting, a VA panel, and a refresh rate of 144 Hz suggest a complete piece of equipment. However, reality verifies these assumptions. We get a device with two faces: a powerful hardware base that struggles under the weight of unrefined software. On one hand, we have excellent brightness, high contrast, and deep blacks, which combined with low input lag and HDMI 2.1 ports should make this television a hit. On the other hand, daily use is marred by annoying bugs: a poor dimming algorithm and an unstable Google TV system. It is clear that the manufacturer lacks experience in optimizing such a complex device. Who is this model for? Mainly for conscious users who can overlook system errors in exchange for high brightness. However, for the average consumer, the Haier M90E currently poses too great a risk. In this price range, the competition is enormous. We can easily find proven models from other brands that offer similar picture parameters but provide a significantly more stable and predictable operation. Rather than experiment, it would be safer to reach for solutions that do not suffer from "growing pains."

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

6.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 240 (15 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Haier M90E Contrast and black detail

Result

139,700:1

Review Haier M90E Contrast and black detail

Result

25,250:1

Review Haier M90E Contrast and black detail

Result

23,150:1

Review Haier M90E Contrast and black detail

Result

9,500:1

Review Haier M90E Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review Haier M90E Contrast and black detail
Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review Haier M90E Contrast and black detail

The model PUS7000 we tested in the 55-inch size is equipped with a VA panel. This is significant for black quality, as in such budget constructions we do not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers a decent contrast of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to much better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, making dark parts of the image not appear washed out, and details in shadows remain visible. However, it is worth noting that in completely dark conditions, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve depth perception, it is advisable to consider watching the TV with soft, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips TVs, which, through a glow on the wall, optically increases contrast. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we do not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series like the PUS8000.

Haier M90E is a fully-fledged Mini LED television utilizing a VA panel. Such a technological combination usually guarantees deep blacks and high contrast. In the tested model with a 55-inch diagonal, the backlighting system is based on 240 independent dimming zones, and their number increases proportionally in the larger variants of this model. Laboratory measurements confirm the high hardware potential – in synthetic tests with active dimming, the contrast exceeded 100,000:1.

However, the dry measurement data does not translate into an ideal picture in real-world applications, which forced us to lower the score in this section. The bottleneck turned out to be the software controlling the zones. The algorithm operates too aggressively and replicates errors we observed earlier in the more expensive M95E model. The problem becomes apparent when bright objects move against a dark background on the screen. The system struggles to smoothly adjust the brightness of individual zones, resulting in unnatural flickering of specific parts of the image. Instead of smooth motion, we see an effect reminiscent of a flickering damaged streetlight, which our test night scene from the film Sicario 2 ruthlessly exposed.

HDR effect quality

3.3/10

6.1/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%
DCI P3: 95.0%, Bt.2020: 75.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review Haier M90E Brightness measurement

Result

1004 nit

Review Haier M90E Brightness measurement

Result

517 nit

Review Haier M90E Brightness measurement

Result

615 nit

Review Haier M90E Brightness measurement

Result

399 nit

Review Haier M90E Brightness measurement

Result

774 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M90E HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M90E HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M90E HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M90E HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Haier M90E

HDR luminance

Philips PUS7000

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is not enough to correctly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a regular SDR recording. Therefore, it's better to stick with the latter format to avoid issues in displaying bright scenes, which you can read about below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers to enhance colors, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colors in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Haier M90E is a television that does not lack brightness. In most movie scenes, peak luminance exceeds 1000 nits, which gives the image a clear "kick" and high dynamics. In typical, bright HDR materials, this looks really good. However, one must take into account the previously mentioned dimming algorithm. In scenes that are not evenly flooded with light – for instance, when displaying individual stars in a black sky – high brightness underscores the imperfections of zone control. Instead of a precise light point, we often see a distinct halo effect around bright objects. Despite these shortcomings, the overall image presentation can be pleasing, largely thanks to color reproduction. The manufacturer applied a PFS phosphor coating, allowing for wide coverage of the color palette. In our measurements, the coverage of the DCI-P3 space was a solid 95%.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

4/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review Haier M90E Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review Haier M90E Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colors. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant deficiencies in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this color cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colors. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, the Philips menu offers many functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

For the measurements, we chose the Film mode, which should ideally offer an image closest to the creators' intentions. Unfortunately, in the case of the M90E, its characteristics – besides the reduced brightness – do not differ much from the Dynamic mode. Both in SDR and HDR content, the image is clearly tinged with a cool blue hue. The white balance is heavily skewed towards blue, reminiscent of typical aggressive "store" settings. This results in an unnatural representation of skin tones and makes the image straining on the eyes during longer viewing sessions. The way brightness is managed also negatively affects color fidelity. The television struggles to maintain proper levels – small details are often too dim, while larger, bright areas of the image tend to get blown out. These deviations in the brightness curve, combined with the cool white balance, lead to very significant color reproduction errors (DeltaE) in the factory settings.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

6/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier M90E Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier M90E Color reproduction after calibration

After professional calibration, it is clear that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not a given. The effects should be assessed in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our corrections, the image looks really good. Most color errors fell below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions typically become visible to the naked eye in measurements. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present themselves naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone primarily watches classic channels or streaming in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be made clear that the PUS7000 is still not a television suitable for sensible HDR, and calibration does not change much here. The reason lies in the hardware: colors remain too undersaturated. The television lacks solutions that expand the color gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot show the intense colors required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it results from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Haier M90E clearly benefits from professional calibration, especially for SDR content. The TV menu offers a sufficient number of tools to effectively correct factory errors. We managed to "tame" the white balance and eliminate the dominant blue tint. We also adjusted, albeit to a lesser extent, the brightness curve (gamma), which allowed us to recover some details in the shadows that were too heavily muted from the factory. The end result for SDR is a picture that is definitely more natural and pleasant to watch. In the case of HDR mode, the success is only partial. Although it was possible to improve the white balance here as well, the color reproduction errors (Color Checker) remained at a high level. Analysis of the EOTF curve (responsible for brightness in HDR) points to the root of the problem: the TV imposes its own interpretation of the signal and does not provide tools to modify this curve. The source of the high errors is not the calibration itself, but the specifics of the device – aggressive and imprecise zone dimming interferes with measurements and is "stiffly" embedded in the characteristics of this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

9.1/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M90E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M90E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M90E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M90E Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of color gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The color transitions are natural and smooth, so there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of gray or simply very dark colors appear on the screen. Unfortunately, you can then see quite strong "stepping" of colors. Instead of smooth transitions, you get clear cuts between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and distract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

The gradient reproduction is one of the strongest points of this model. In the vast majority of film scenes, the Haier M90E handles this task flawlessly, seamlessly blending adjacent colors. We did not observe any issues with posterization or clear color separation (banding) here. Minor imperfections were only noticeable in very demanding frames based on a gray palette. However, even under such challenging conditions, the errors are minimal, and the image remains consistent.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M90E Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M90E Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has a flaw: if the action is too aggressive, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It’s a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the sweet spot between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, which is the enhancement of lower quality materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for almost all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu to achieve a more pronounced effect.

The evaluation of the image processor must be divided into two separate aspects, as the Haier M90E behaves inconsistently in this regard. The first issue is the upscaling itself, that is, scaling lower-resolution content to 4K. In this task, the television performs quite decently. The algorithms effectively enhance the detail, resulting in a final image that is relatively sharp, clear, and readable. In this respect, it's hard to have major complaints about the device.

The situation looks completely different with materials that have a high degree of compression, which we encounter in older recordings or on platforms like YouTube with lower bitrate. Here, the processor falters in smoothing tonal transitions and masking source imperfections. The television cannot hide compression blocks, resulting in a very harsh, "digital" character of the image. The lack of effective artifact reduction can effectively discourage viewing lower-quality content on this screen.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.9/10

7.2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
-
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

In this regard, we don't really have any good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually standard, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the TV does not have any motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems for either movies or sports. We have to accept that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion may appear choppy or unclear. We have no way to enable any smoother that would soften this effect.

The Haier M90E is equipped with a simple yet functional motion smoothing system (MEMC). In the settings menu, the user will find a three-level adjustment scale: low, medium, and high. This allows for tailoring the degree of interference with the image to personal preferences – from gentle smoothing of 24p movies to maximum fluidity (soap opera effect). The system operates stably and fulfills its purpose in typical applications.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

7.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming TV, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While there is no support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has included several important features that genuinely improve the comfort of playing on a console. The most significant of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronizing the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from "tearing" and keeps it consistent even during sudden frame drops in the game. In turn, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to the lowest latency mode right after detecting a signal from the console. All of these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick overview of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

From a hardware perspective, the Haier M90E is a solid proposition. The TV is equipped with two full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, which ensures support for key technologies: VRR (variable refresh rate) and ALLM (automatic low-latency mode). A plus is also the correct implementation of the Dolby Vision mode for gaming, which maintains a relatively low input lag. Problems arise with software configuration. The biggest drawback is the forced, continuous dynamic tone mapping by the TV's processor. This prevents proper HDR calibration from the console using system panels (HGiG) – the TV ignores source settings and processes the image its own way. We also noted shortcomings in the interface: the M90E does not have a typical "Game Bar" (overlay with parameters), which is a standard among competitors. Cooperation with Xbox consoles at unusual parameters turned out to be problematic – the device has difficulty correctly displaying 1440p resolution at 120 Hz refresh rate. Despite the aforementioned shortcomings in the software, the Haier M90E remains a very attractive screen for gamers. The final impression is saved by a solid hardware base. Native panel refresh at 144 Hz and the presence of full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports are advantages that are crucial in daily use. If we are looking for a TV that provides high fluidity and supports 4K signals, this model will fulfill its task.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
17 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
12 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
20 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is small enough that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this regard, the PUS7000 can keep pace with much more expensive televisions.

In terms of signal delay, the Haier M90E performs very favorably. Measurements for a signal frequency of 120 Hz showed a value below 10 ms. Such a result guarantees high responsiveness in games, and the delay between pressing a button on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically imperceptible to the user.

Compatibility with PC

5.8/10

6.7/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 Compatibility with PC
Review Haier M90E Compatibility with PC

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming options are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The TV correctly handles chrominance sampling at 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or color, is displayed sharp and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble with clean font rendering.

Connecting a computer to the M90E yields mixed results. Hardware-wise, it's good: the TV supports G-Sync, FreeSync, and refresh rates up to 144 Hz. In games, everything works properly. The issue arises when displaying the desktop and text. In 144 Hz mode, the TV struggles with chroma subsampling 4:4:4. Fonts appear jagged and unclear, making reading tiring for the eyes. To achieve readable, sharp text (as seen in our comparative photos), one must lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz. This forces the user to constantly "tweak" the settings in Windows – 144 Hz for gaming, 60 Hz for browsing the internet or working.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

2.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
70%
82%

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which results directly from the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just slightly shifting to the side is enough for the colors to start losing saturation, and the picture becomes noticeably worse.

The use of a VA panel comes with specific consequences. The viewing angles on the M90E are simply very poor. This is a typical characteristic of this technology, but it's important to be aware of it before making a purchase. Even with a slight deviation from the central axis, the image begins to degrade. Blacks turn gray, contrast drops drastically, and colors lose saturation and become washed out. In direct comparison with IPS (or ADS) panels, Haier falls short. Where IPS maintains a consistent image even for viewers sitting to the side, the M90E requires viewing straight on. If you plan to set the television in a wide living room where family members watch movies from different places, this model will not be a good choice.

Daytime performance

3.5/10

7.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review Haier M90E Daytime performance
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review Haier M90E Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Haier M90E: 843 cd/m2

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all because the panel is simply dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score that does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin screen coating does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to it, the panel does not display reflections as prominently, but this is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be unclear.

The screen is covered with a satin finish. This solution does quite well at reducing glare, although it does not eliminate it completely. The greatest advantage of the M90E in this aspect is its high brightness. In everyday use (SDR content), luminance can exceed the 1000-nit threshold. Such a power reserve allows the TV to easily "break through" existing light. The image remains clear and readable even in very brightly lit rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
RTMA.250416.189
Image processor
mt5889

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Haier M90E TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Haier M90E TV Panel details

Philips PUS7000

Haier M90E

TV features

5/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    No
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Haier M90E TV features
Review Haier M90E TV features
Review Haier M90E TV features
Review Haier M90E TV features
Review Haier M90E TV features
Review Haier M90E TV features

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is evident in daily use. Overall, it operates sluggishly, sometimes even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means that we have to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, the screen mirroring feature with computers equipped with Windows failed to work again. Fortunately, streaming from Apple devices using AirPlay went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who mainly watch traditional television. Here we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic program guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which greatly facilitates operation after dark, and it has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. Interestingly, there is a classic headphone jack input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theater systems or wired headphones without the need for additional adapters.

Smart TV System – Google TV

Haier M90E operates on the Google TV platform. This means access to a vast library of applications, efficient voice search, and a built-in Chromecast for streaming content from your phone. Theoretically, the functionality is complete. In practice, the software adaptation by the manufacturer leaves much to be desired. The system in Haier's execution is unstable and "buggy." During testing, we repeatedly encountered errors, apps would freeze or refuse to cooperate. It is clear that the company is still gaining experience in optimizing such a demanding environment as the Google system. We hope that over time and with subsequent updates, these "growing pains" will be eliminated, but at this moment, the experience can be frustrating.

Classic and Multimedia Features

In terms of traditional equipment, only one element truly deserves praise: the physical headphone output. This connection is increasingly being removed by competitors, and here it is still available, which will be appreciated by owners of older audio equipment. Aside from this exception, the list of features is very average. The TV does not offer the ability to record TV channels to a USB memory (PVR). There is also a lack of picture-in-picture (PiP) functionality. Here, we only get the essential minimum, without any added value.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without major issues. The TV easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a disk or USB drive should not feel limited. The only complaint pertains to the photo browser - not everything worked correctly, and some files, especially at certain resolutions, would not open at all.

The built-in media player is one of the strongest features of this model. We can confidently state that it is one of the best and most "universal" players we have had the opportunity to test. The device handles practically every audio and video format. During tests with our test library, the television flawlessly opened the vast majority of files, regardless of the codec or container used. Users with extensive movie collections on external drives will not have compatibility issues here.

Sound

5.8/10

8.6/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    83dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound is already at a typical budget level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programs, but when it comes to movies and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price range, it's hard to expect something more, so if we care about better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even through the headphone output.

The Haier M90E offers sound quality that pleasantly surprises, considering the lack of a sophisticated external audio system (e.g., soundbar). The design relies on hidden main speakers and two visible subwoofers located on the back wall of the casing. This configuration results in a specific sound characteristic. The TV generates clear, audible bass and well-exposed high tones. The only weaker point is the reproduction of mid tones. Our measurements of the frequency response indicated a slight dip in this range (a dip on the graph). Despite this technical inconsistency, the overall sound experience in daily use remains enjoyable.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

83dBC (Max)

75dBC