Philips OLED950 vs Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW)

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

The Frame Pro / LS03HW

Info

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.4

7.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.8

    6.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    6.5

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    6.9

  • Gaming on console

    9.5

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.5

    8.4

  • Watching in bright light

    7.3

    6.5

  • Utility functions

    6.5

    7.7

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    8.2

    6.4

Advantages

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test panels (Tandem OLED matrix)

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent support for gamers: 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of applications

  • Backlit remote control, rechargeable via USB-C port

  • On-wall picture styling: interchangeable frames

  • Rich accessories: wall mount and Wiralles One Connect included

  • Art Store: the best art scans on the market

  • Matte screen finish, no reflections

  • High brightness: 850-900 nits

  • Wide color gamut (QLED)

  • Many gaming features: VRR, ALLM, up to 240Hz refresh rate, Game Motion Plus

  • Smooth and clear motion: relatively low motion blur for a VA panel

  • Tizen OS with many modern features

Disadvantages

No like
  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterization

  • Poor black levels for a Neo QLED screen (edge-lit backlight)

  • Art Store requires a monthly subscription (you can work around this by uploading your own photos 😉)

  • Poor viewing angles (they could be improved for a better on-wall picture effect)

  • High input lag when using the Wireless One Connect wireless module

Our verdict

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines what we can expect from a home entertainment center in many aspects. The use of groundbreaking Tandem OLED technology means that when it comes to picture quality, we are reaching absolute heights here. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that, at times, take your breath away. Whether we are watching movies in a sunlit living room or playing games at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with some disappointment when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips strongly promoted the use of a "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, the reality turned out to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we expected a much greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool head, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It's not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" fight within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant image generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins at the starting gate in terms of audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the more expensive 950 model in favor of a different design. Thus, we encounter a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips TV" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

The Frame Pro 2026 makes the most sense when you want a TV that looks good in the living room and isn’t just another large black slab on the wall. And here Samsung still does something most manufacturers can’t match. Flush mounting, interchangeable bezels, Art Mode, a matte finish and the wireless One Connect mean that when The Frame Pro is hung correctly it can really look more like a piece of decor than AV equipment. In our view, it’s the best-executed TV of this kind on the market. Importantly, you don’t entirely pay for the looks with everyday performance. The Frame Pro is bright, the matte finish handles reflections very well, so it works really well in a brightly lit living room. Colors are vivid, motion is handled very well, and there are surprisingly many gamer-friendly features for a TV that’s primarily meant to “look better.” More questions arise when you consider the “Pro” badge and the fact it’s labelled as a Neo QLED screen. From that you might expect a large jump in picture quality over the regular The Frame, but in practice it isn’t that big. The TV uses Mini-LED backlighting and local dimming, but the zones are located at the edges of the screen. That’s a completely different approach than in more advanced Mini-LEDs, where the backlight works across the whole panel. That isn’t a major issue in bright, colorful scenes. It becomes more noticeable in the evening, especially in films with many dark scenes. Then you can see that black levels and backlight control are clearly weaker than in the best Mini-LED TVs. This is where it becomes most clear that “Pro” doesn’t mean top-tier picture quality in this case. An interesting alternative is the Samsung S99H. It has a strong design focus, but in terms of picture it really goes further. Of course it also costs significantly more, so it’s not a direct replacement but rather an option for someone who wants to combine both worlds with fewer compromises. So is it worth buying The Frame Pro 2026? We think yes, but only if you know what you’re paying for. The TV’s biggest strengths are its looks, Art Mode, very good performance in a bright living room, and the wireless One Connect. If that’s what you’re looking for, The Frame Pro is a very appealing option. If the main reason to pay extra is significantly better picture quality, we’re less convinced. It’s simply a better, more refined The Frame, not a full-fledged rival to the best Mini-LEDs.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
USB-C, Micro-HDMI
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand, Wall bracket, One Connect Box

Contrast and black detail

10/10

5.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 24 (1 x 24)

Contrast:

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,250:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

There's no need to elaborate here. Like in every OLED TV, the black level and contrast in the Philips OLED950 are simply perfect. No matter the movie scene being watched, nighttime shots, or materials in 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without bleeding or washout. This is one of the biggest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED TVs. There are no algorithms for local dimming at play here, nor are there any compromises. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the movie Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a characteristic of our test sample, more related to the nature of image reproduction than to the black level itself. In this regard, everything here is top-notch.

The Frame Pro officially belongs to the Neo QLED family, so it uses a Mini-LED backlight. But it’s not the same kind of Mini-LED we know from most TVs in that series. Instead of a large number of zones placed behind the panel, there is only a single row of zones at the edge. In practice, then, it’s an edge-lit design that simply uses smaller diodes. And unfortunately that becomes apparent fairly quickly in blacks. There is simply too little local dimming for the TV to handle more demanding scenes well. In our measurements, contrast most often fell in the 3000–5000:1 range, so it’s hard to talk about performance on par with more elaborate Mini-LED implementations. You notice it most when single bright elements appear on a dark background. A larger part of the image lights up with them, causing blacks to look noticeably shallower, even navy. A scene from the film Sicario 2 illustrates this well. Because of that placement of the zones, the TV simply lacks the precision to show it any other way. The Frame Pro uses Mini-LED, but its black-level performance is much closer to simpler designs. It’s a shame, because this was exactly the aspect we complained about most last year.

HDR effect quality

8.7/10

6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%
DCI P3: 95.0%, Bt.2020: 71.8%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

834 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

536 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

545 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

460 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

668 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW)

Philips OLED950

Luminance of RGB colors

OLED950 is a phenomenal TV for consuming HDR content, which is primarily due to the use of innovative Tandem OLED technology. With this technology, the screen is capable of generating astronomical brightness values, reaching over 2000 nits in movie scenes (on test screens). This is an outstanding result, placing the OLED950 model among the very top displays available on the market. However, it should be noted that there is a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, the brightness can drop by as much as half. Nevertheless, it is worth emphasizing that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for HDR images to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of light scenes.

The use of Tandem OLED technology has also brought measurable benefits in terms of color reproduction, improving elements where traditional WOLED panels have had difficulties compared to QD-OLED competitors. In the case of the OLED950, the color gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high achievements of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world usage. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colors look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

You can't deny The Frame Pro one thing: brightness. We measured a maximum of around 850 to 900 nits, so the TV already has enough power to render many HDR scenes really impressively. Bright, full-screen shots and more colorful frames look best here. In those scenes The Frame Pro can make a good impression because the image is bright, strong, and delivers the effect we expect from HDR. In our measurements some scenes reached over 800 nits, and even in trickier sections the TV maintained a fairly decent brightness level.

The problem starts when HDR relies on small bright elements shown against a dark background. Individual lamps, stars, or highlights can be bright, but very often the black level across much of the image also lifts. As a result, the bright point itself may look good, but the whole frame loses a lot of quality. That is why The Frame Pro shows HDR best in scenes that are simply full-screen. If a movie or series contains many such shots, the effect can be really enjoyable. In darker material the limitations of local dimming become much more noticeable.

Colors

The Frame Pro deserves praise for its color gamut coverage. The TV uses quantum dots, a solution known as QLED, which allows it to produce very well-saturated colors. In our measurements coverage of the important film color space DCI-P3 was about 94.5%, while the more demanding BT.2020 was around 72%.

Those are very solid results that in most scenes deliver pleasant, saturated colors. Of course, these values are not as striking as those in the latest displays using RGB backlighting, but The Frame Pro makes up for that with something else: color stability. Regardless of the scene, color saturation remains fairly consistent, and there is no situation where the TV loses a lot of color in more demanding shots.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the OLED950 model in Movie mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice, it proved to be not without flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge wasn't the white balance itself – although it did have a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish tint. The main problem lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. Analysis of the gamma chart and EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively highlights brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology would allow. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

In SDR material The Frame Pro in Filmmaker mode performs quite well, though it falls short of perfect. White balance is relatively even, but as brightness increases the blue component starts to drop, so brighter parts of the image can have a slightly warmer tint. A bigger difference is visible in the gamma, that is how screen brightness is managed. Across most of the range it runs below our reference point, which means the TV brightens midtones a bit. As a result the image can appear slightly brighter and less contrasty than it should. The color errors themselves are not huge, but they are visible enough that calibration can still make a substantial improvement. In HDR content the white balance looks similar: across much of the range it is fairly even, with larger deviations appearing only at higher brightness. The EOTF curve is more revealing. The Frame Pro follows reference values fairly well in the brighter parts of the image, but noticeably brightens the darkest portions. This stems mainly from the TV’s backlight design. That also affects colors. With less saturated colors the errors are still moderate, but they grow significantly as saturation increases. In ColorChecker measurements a large portion of samples already register high error values. The out-of-the-box HDR can therefore be considered decent, but it is definitely not an image we would call very faithful.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.4/10

8.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

As can be seen, the OLED950 transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display after a professional calibration process, which without a shadow of a doubt can be placed in the same category as the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the color palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering top-notch image quality.

After calibration the biggest improvement is visible primarily in SDR content. White balance was evened out, but the more important change was the gamma correction, which before calibration had the greatest impact on the picture's character. After adjustments the gamma response is now very close to the reference, so the image is not as bright in the midtones and simply looks more natural. Color errors have also been noticeably reduced, so the effect of calibration in SDR is clearly visible. In HDR the situation is a bit more complex. White balance was improved and over part of the range the TV tracks the reference much better, but deviations still appear at higher brightness levels. The same applies to color reproduction, as some errors can be corrected but not all result from the settings themselves. This reveals the limitations of the TV's design and the way the backlight and local dimming affect the HDR image. That's why, for The Frame Pro, calibration makes the biggest difference for everyday content. Regular broadcast TV, YouTube, and SDR movies and series (mainly those from cheaper streaming tiers) can look noticeably better after calibration.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

If we had to point out the weaker point of the OLED950 model compared to market competitors like the G5 or S95F, it would be, as with most TVs from this manufacturer, the digital signal processing. Although the processor used here is referred to as a "dual" processor, our tests did not show significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are in reality symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, especially dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterization. However, it should be clearly emphasized that this is a "flaw" that an average viewer very rarely notices during normal usage, and the overall reception remains at a high level.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, The Frame Pro performs really well. In most content there is no noticeable banding or ugly transitions between similar tones, and gradients look smooth and natural. Even in more demanding scenes with fog or dark transitions, issues appear very rarely. This is definitely one of this model's stronger points.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling

In terms of image scaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Lower resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. Such a presentation will certainly appeal to many. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can gently enhance them with the appropriate slider in the TV menu. In this aspect, it's really hard to pick on anything. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no problem with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The tonal transition smoothing feature fares a bit worse. In the settings, we find an option called “Distortion Reduction.” This allows for three levels of processor intervention adjustment. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out the skin details of actors. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It removes definitely too many details from the face and background elements or can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth playing around with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preferences. It might seem that the Medium option represents the best compromise here.

The Frame Pro uses the NQ4 AI Gen3 processor, so in terms of image processing it behaves very similarly to Samsung's other recent TVs. Upscaling works really well; lower-resolution material is sensibly sharpened and the image remains clear without overemphasizing edges. With regular broadcast TV or lower-quality YouTube clips, this can provide a noticeable improvement, although viewers watching much older material, for example from VHS tapes, may notice a slight left-side cropping (overscan).

It's a bit different when it comes to improving more heavily compressed images through noise reduction and artifact suppression for issues like posterization. The "Noise Reduction" function can improve weaker material, but fairly quickly it starts to interfere with the image and remove fine detail or grain. So it's best used sparingly and mainly when the source truly needs it.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
70%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

The motion representation in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the matrix shows no blurring at all. Thanks to this, we can enjoy flawless sharpness in practically any conditions. A big part of this is not only due to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

The Frame Pro is equipped with a 144 Hz panel and, when connected to a PC, also supports 240 Hz at Full HD resolution. That’s, of course, a feature aimed mainly at PC gamers, but the TV also performs very well at the standard 120 Hz refresh rate we use for watching sports or playing on consoles. A big plus is its minimal motion blur. For a VA panel The Frame Pro does really well in this regard. You don’t see strong, dark trails following moving objects that are fairly common on TVs with this type of panel. As a result, fast sports and dynamic games remain clear in motion. It also includes motion smoothing with adjustable smoothness, so for movies and sports broadcasts you can tune the motion character to your preferences. Our recommended settings can be found in the photo.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

OLED950 is almost the perfect TV for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere that the Ambilight system creates during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the solid hardware support. We find literally everything that one should expect from a modern gaming screen today. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the ALLM automatic game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal effortlessly, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most graphically attractive on the market, it fully serves its purpose. It displays all the most important signal parameters and offers useful additions. Gamers can take advantage of the mini-map zoom function or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. Adjusting the contrast range also proves useful. It allows for brightening shadows and achieving better visibility of enemies hidden in the dark corners of the map.

Function-wise for gamers The Frame Pro has a lot to offer. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, VRR, ALLM and correctly implemented HGiG. When you connect a PC you can also use 144 Hz at 4K, and even 240 Hz if you drop to Full HD. Samsung also adds its standard set of gaming extras: a robust Game Bar that lets you quickly view and adjust key settings, and Game Motion Plus, which can improve the smoothness of games running at 30 or 60 fps. There’s also the Gaming Hub and the ability to play in the cloud without needing to connect a console. The only real omission is Dolby Vision Gaming, which Samsung doesn’t support. Otherwise The Frame Pro offers practically everything you can expect today from a well-equipped gaming TV.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
13 ms
1080p120
5 ms
7 ms
2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

According to what we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated nearly reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via a controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

adasdsadddas

Input Lag Wirales One Connect (2-3 metry od TV)

SDR

HDR

1080p60 Hz: 61

2160p60 Hz HDR: 71

1080p120 Hz: 39

2160p120 Hz HDR: 32

2160p60 Hz: 63

2160p120 Hz: 32

Compatibility with PC

6.5/10

8.4/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BWRG
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It works excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. We have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low signal latency. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we examine the readability of the fonts. We're not just talking about the unusual subpixel arrangement of the WOLED panels (BWRG), which in all televisions of this type causes a specific coloration of text edges. The tested model struggles with correctly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colored text on another colorful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artifacts. It's a bit of a shame, although one must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as a monitor for office work, you may feel disappointed.

The Frame Pro performs well when connected to a computer. It supports full 4:4:4, 144 Hz at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD. It also works with both NVIDIA’s G-Sync and AMD’s FreeSync. However, it’s not ideal for working with text. From a normal viewing distance everything looks fine, but up close you can see minor artifacts around fonts and slightly less crisp edges. This doesn’t affect gaming or watching content much, but it can be noticeable during office work.

Viewing angles

7.6/10

3.4/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
72%

As befits organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where we sit on the sofa while looking at the screen. The only reservation comes when directly comparing the used Tandem OLED matrix with the competition's solutions. Compared to last year's LG panels equipped with the MLA filter or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they still generally maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it's hard to consider this a drawback.

Viewing angles on The Frame Pro are mediocre, if not poor. The TV uses a conventional VA panel, and at wider angles the image loses quality fairly quickly. Brightness drops first and foremost, but color saturation also noticeably fades, making the picture look more washed out. That’s a bit more of a shame with The Frame Pro than with a regular TV. It’s a model that’s often meant to hang on the wall and double as artwork, so better viewing angles would be very welcome.

Daytime performance

7.3/10

6.5/10

Panel finish
Glare
Matte
Reflection suppression
Decent
Very Good
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Average

Panel brightness

Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW): 587 cd/m2

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

The OLED950 model works perfectly well in really bright rooms without concerns. The key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. In terms of OLED technology, the performance is impressive. It can confidently be stated that in this regard, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant plus for the tested device.

However, there is one drawback that can be described as its Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has used a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It's worth keeping this in mind when planning the TV’s placement relative to windows, as reflections may be visible.

During the day The Frame Pro performs quite well. SDR brightness stays around 600 nits, so the picture remains readable even in a brightly lit room. The biggest advantage, however, is the matte screen coating, which disperses reflections very effectively and makes lights or windows less noticeable on the screen. We did notice, though, that in this year’s model the coating affects the image a bit more. With more light, blacks become slightly brighter and colors lose some of their depth. It’s still a very good choice for a bright living room, but in that respect the screen isn’t entirely without compromises.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
1204
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV Panel details

TV features

6.5/10

7.7/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    USB-C, Micro-HDMI
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features

The biggest advantage of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favor of TitanOS, but here we fortunately still have a fully functional environment based on Android. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, our editorial team was once again unable to launch Windows Miracast, despite the manufacturer declaring that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics," the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most criticisms are directed at the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed, has backlighting, "hybrid" switching between the control of typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charges via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly fades when it turns out you need to point it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Tizen and Smart TV features

Tizen is, of course, responsible for the Smart TV features. The system runs smoothly and offers a wide selection of streaming apps. It also supports AirPlay, Miracast, and voice search in Polish. In that respect The Frame Pro isn’t particularly different from other new Samsungs; it simply provides the manufacturer’s extensive, well-functioning system.

Art Mode and Art Store

Art Mode is, naturally, much more interesting, since it’s one of the most important features of the entire Frame series. When turned off, the TV can display paintings, photos, or graphics instead of a black screen and can actually do a pretty good job of mimicking a classic picture hanging on the wall. Samsung offers access to the Art Store, where the selection of works is really large and the pieces are provided in very high quality. The problem is that full access requires a subscription, and in our opinion that’s a significant downside for a TV whose main selling point is this feature. Fortunately, we aren’t limited to the Art Store. We can upload our own photos or graphics, so nothing prevents us from finding a high-resolution piece ourselves and displaying it on the screen. The automation of this mode is also handled in a very interesting way. The Frame Pro not only has an ambient light sensor, which can adjust the appearance of the displayed image to the room, but also a presence sensor. The TV can therefore detect that someone is in the room and automatically activate Art Mode.

Classic features

When it comes to classic TV features, The Frame Pro offers a rather basic set of conveniences. It has DVB-T/T2, DVB-S/S2 and DVB-C tuners, teletext, an audio-only mode, and the ability to use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speakers simultaneously. However, it lacks USB program recording, PiP, and a more advanced remote, for example one with a numeric keypad. The remote operates via radio, so you don’t need to point it at the screen.

Apps

9.6/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.5/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in file player in the OLED950 model works wonderfully. During our tests, the device handled practically every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks, or photos, the TV played them without any issues. It’s hard to find any weak points in handling the most popular standards. However, if someone still finds something lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not limited to just the default solutions. At any moment, one can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This ensures that the TV can handle literally any file from our home library.

The Frame Pro handles playback of files from a USB drive well. Most popular video, audio, and photo formats work properly, so you probably won't need to connect a laptop just to play a movie or browse photos. The biggest omission is support for HEIC, the format commonly used for photos taken with iPhones. Apple users will therefore have to convert those photos to a supported format beforehand or simply stream them to the TV via AirPlay. Otherwise, the player works great.

Sound

8.2/10

6.4/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The 2.1 speaker system used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a solid dose of quality sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the case, the sound is deep and has a distinct punch. This element is often missing in cheaper models, where the bass is practically nonexistent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That TV, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you're big fans of Ambilight, and the sound issue is taken care of by your external home theater or soundbar.

The sound on The Frame Pro is adequate and has changed little compared with last year’s model. The TV handles dialogue particularly well, with voices that are clear and easy to hear. However, it lacks stronger bass, so movies and music don’t have much depth. Therefore, if you care about better sound, consider a soundbar when buying The Frame Pro. Models from the S series fit especially well here, their sleek design matching the look of the TV. Finally, it’s worth noting that The Frame Pro supports Dolby Atmos, so with a compatible soundbar or AV receiver you can enjoy immersive surround sound. It does not support DTS, which is worth keeping in mind when playing movies from your own library, e.g., Blu-ray discs.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

89dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy