Philips OLED950 vs IFFALCON U85X

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

U85X1

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Available screen sizes: 65”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.4

6.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.8

    6.2

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    6.1

  • Gaming on console

    9.5

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.5

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.3

    5.6

  • Utility functions

    6.5

    7.6

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    8.2

    6.9

Advantages

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test panels (Tandem OLED matrix)

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent support for gamers: 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of applications

  • Backlit remote control, rechargeable via USB-C port

  • Good contrast and black: VA panel with MINI-LED local dimming zones

  • High HDR brightness: sturdy 650 nits

  • Decent colors: thanks to the PFS filter (according to the manufacturer QLED)

  • Amazing for gamers: full HDMI 2.1, 144Hz, very low input lag, and VRR/ALLM features

  • Great as a monitor: 240Hz mode, support for G-SYNC/FreeSync

  • Powerful sound – dedicated subwoofer provides a realistically felt bass

  • Versatile Smart TV – advanced Google TV system with full AirPlay support

Disadvantages

No like
  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterization

  • Visible smearing

  • Backlight management could be better

  • Poor viewing angles – typical color degradation of VA panels when viewed from the side

  • Software errors – inaccurate menu translations and occasional drops in system fluidity

Our verdict

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines what we can expect from a home entertainment center in many aspects. The use of groundbreaking Tandem OLED technology means that when it comes to picture quality, we are reaching absolute heights here. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that, at times, take your breath away. Whether we are watching movies in a sunlit living room or playing games at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with some disappointment when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips strongly promoted the use of a "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, the reality turned out to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we expected a much greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool head, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It's not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" fight within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant image generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins at the starting gate in terms of audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the more expensive 950 model in favor of a different design. Thus, we encounter a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips TV" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

The iFFALCON U85X is a device that draws heavily from the technological solutions of its parent brand, TCL. It is hard not to get the impression that in terms of pure technical parameters, we are dealing with nearly a faithful copy of the successful C6K series (C69K/Q6C), although visually, the designers opted for references to the more budget-friendly P line. This specific combination makes the television do exactly what we expect from a solid Mini-LED at an even lower price. It provides very good contrast and a vivid HDR effect, which is directly due to the impressive number of local dimming zones. It is worth noting that, just like the models from the C series, the iFFALCON U85X turns out to be exceptionally tailored to the needs of gamers. You will find almost every function necessary for comfortable gaming, from full support for HDMI 2.1 ports, through ALLM and VRR technologies for console owners, to excellent compatibility with PCs. As a monitor, the device performs superbly not only due to its refresh rate support up to 240Hz but also because of its very sharp and legible font, which is not always a given in the world of televisions. Of course, it is not an ideal model, as it shares the same set of advantages and disadvantages as its counterpart under the TCL brand – mainly referring to issues like noticeable motion blur and aggressive brightness management in HDR. However, it all creates an extremely interesting mix that makes us seriously contemplate the sense of the existence of the iFFALCON brand as a separate entity, since the same product could successfully debut with a full-fledged TCL logo on the casing. Nevertheless, we have no major reservations about the device itself; it is truly a model worth attention as long as you manage to purchase it, as it is very difficult to obtain at the moment.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 224 (14 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review IFFALCON U85X Contrast and black detail

Result

113,850:1

Review IFFALCON U85X Contrast and black detail

Result

24,800:1

Review IFFALCON U85X Contrast and black detail

Result

10,950:1

Review IFFALCON U85X Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review IFFALCON U85X Contrast and black detail

Result

6,050:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

There's no need to elaborate here. Like in every OLED TV, the black level and contrast in the Philips OLED950 are simply perfect. No matter the movie scene being watched, nighttime shots, or materials in 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without bleeding or washout. This is one of the biggest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED TVs. There are no algorithms for local dimming at play here, nor are there any compromises. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the movie Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a characteristic of our test sample, more related to the nature of image reproduction than to the black level itself. In this regard, everything here is top-notch.

In terms of black levels and contrast, the 65-inch iFFALCON U85X is almost an exact replica of the solutions known from TCL's C6K and C69K models, offering the same number of 224 local dimming zones in a 14x16 arrangement. Thanks to the use of a VA panel and such a solid number of zones, the device can generate an image with impressive depth, where our measurements in real movie scenes indicated a contrast exceeding 100,000:1. Of course, at this level of hardware, local dimming does not always exhibit perfect precision, so in more challenging scenes with bright details on a dark background, we have to reckon with the occurrence of halo effects, which are subtle glows around objects. Nevertheless, the overall quality of black levels is very high and will certainly satisfy the majority of users seeking cinematic experiences. The image certainly appears to have greater depth than in solutions without any local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

8.7/10

4.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%
DCI P3: 93.7%, Bt.2020: 72.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Review IFFALCON U85X Brightness measurement

Result

627 nit

Review IFFALCON U85X Brightness measurement

Result

165 nit

Review IFFALCON U85X Brightness measurement

Result

390 nit

Review IFFALCON U85X Brightness measurement

Result

124 nit

Review IFFALCON U85X Brightness measurement

Result

528 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

IFFALCON U85X

Philips OLED950

Luminance of RGB colors

OLED950 is a phenomenal TV for consuming HDR content, which is primarily due to the use of innovative Tandem OLED technology. With this technology, the screen is capable of generating astronomical brightness values, reaching over 2000 nits in movie scenes (on test screens). This is an outstanding result, placing the OLED950 model among the very top displays available on the market. However, it should be noted that there is a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, the brightness can drop by as much as half. Nevertheless, it is worth emphasizing that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for HDR images to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of light scenes.

The use of Tandem OLED technology has also brought measurable benefits in terms of color reproduction, improving elements where traditional WOLED panels have had difficulties compared to QD-OLED competitors. In the case of the OLED950, the color gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high achievements of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world usage. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colors look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

iFFALCON U85 handles HDR in a rather dual manner – on one hand, it can surprise with a solid peak brightness of around 650 nits, which places it well above average in this price segment. This is particularly evident in full-screen, bright scenes. Examples from movies like Life of Pi or the final test sequences from The Meg prove that the TV can maintain the strength and essence of the HDR effect when the entire panel has to "light up," delivering truly satisfying experiences. However, problems begin in high-contrast scenes, where smaller, bright details appear on the screen; the dimming algorithms prioritize deep blacks to such an extent that they can suppress the brightness of small highlights to just 100 nits, drastically reducing the dynamism of the image and depriving us of the true "punch" we expect from HDR standards. However, the question of colors remains a sweetener; thanks to the use of the PFS phosphor filter (marketed as QLED by the manufacturer), they look very good, achieving nearly 94% coverage of the DCI-P3 color palette, allowing for a rich and vibrant image in most content.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

4.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the OLED950 model in Movie mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice, it proved to be not without flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge wasn't the white balance itself – although it did have a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish tint. The main problem lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. Analysis of the gamma chart and EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively highlights brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology would allow. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

We tested the factory colors in the iFFALCON U85X model in “Film” mode, which is definitely the most reliable among all available settings, although it is still far from perfect. The main problem that stands out in both SDR and HDR content is improper white balance - an excess of blue and red components gives the image a slight purple tint, which undermines the naturalness of film scenes. However, an even greater challenge is the way the television manages its brightness. Analyzing the gamma curve for the SDR signal, we noticed significant instability: instead of sticking to the reference value of 2.4, the device oscillates around 2.2, only to suddenly experience an unnatural jump to around 3.0. In practice, this leads to confusing effects - large bright areas on the screen appear too dark, while smaller elements are unnecessarily brightened. A similar feature can be found in the EOTF curve, which makes the image unpredictable and loses its cinematic authenticity.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.4/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

As can be seen, the OLED950 transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display after a professional calibration process, which without a shadow of a doubt can be placed in the same category as the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the color palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering top-notch image quality.

After professional calibration of the movie mode, we must admit that the effect is more than satisfactory – the iFFALCON U85X undergoes a true transformation. Color errors in SDR content dropped to a level below 2, making them practically imperceptible to the human eye. We managed to set the white balance almost perfectly, and brightness management (gamma) became nearly exemplary. As a result, with standard quality materials, the television looks simply perfect, and it's hard to find any faults with it.

In the case of HDR signal, the situation has also improved significantly, although here the nature of the device is a bit more pronounced. Color errors have been reduced to around 3, which is an outstanding result in this price range. However, it is worth taking a look at the EOTF chart (available on the right side of the screen in the filters: 4K HDR, gamma / EOTF) to see what is not immediately visible regarding brightness management by the U85. Although the reference line looks decent, in actual film scenes, the television still interprets the signal "in its own way" due to very aggressive local dimming algorithms. Does this disqualify this model for watching HDR content? Absolutely not. It's simply a typical ailment of almost every Mini-LED that has to reconcile high brightness with an attempt to maintain deep black. One just has to be aware of these technical limitations, which are unavoidable in this segment.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

If we had to point out the weaker point of the OLED950 model compared to market competitors like the G5 or S95F, it would be, as with most TVs from this manufacturer, the digital signal processing. Although the processor used here is referred to as a "dual" processor, our tests did not show significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are in reality symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, especially dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterization. However, it should be clearly emphasized that this is a "flaw" that an average viewer very rarely notices during normal usage, and the overall reception remains at a high level.

When it comes to the smoothness of tonal transitions, the iFFALCON U85X performs quite decently. In most scenes, gradients are almost imperceptible, so the irritating "banding" of colors shouldn't be noticeable during everyday viewing, for example, on ChooseTV. However, it must be honestly admitted that in very dark frames, the image is not always perfectly smooth, and certain imperfections in transitions between shades can be observed. Nonetheless, this result is more than satisfactory and does not spoil the overall perception of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling

In terms of image scaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Lower resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. Such a presentation will certainly appeal to many. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can gently enhance them with the appropriate slider in the TV menu. In this aspect, it's really hard to pick on anything. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no problem with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The tonal transition smoothing feature fares a bit worse. In the settings, we find an option called “Distortion Reduction.” This allows for three levels of processor intervention adjustment. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out the skin details of actors. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It removes definitely too many details from the face and background elements or can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth playing around with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preferences. It might seem that the Medium option represents the best compromise here.

When it comes to scaling the image to 4K resolution, the iFFALCON U85X performs solidly. The device efficiently enhances low-quality signals, making even older materials look clean and clear on the 4K matrix. At extremely low resolutions, such as 480p, you can notice slightly jagged edges (especially on thin lines), but let's face it – this is a scenario you'll only encounter when watching very old footage, so it's not a real issue in everyday use.

However, the digital processing aimed at smoothing tonal transitions is significantly worse. Although the menu features a function called “Gradual Smoothing”, its effectiveness is at least debatable. In practice, it does not effectively reduce banding (color stepping), and worse, it can cause more harm than good. This filter can be too aggressive where it shouldn't be, artificially smoothing out details that should not be touched, such as the natural texture of the face or fine details of the skin's texture. Instead of improving quality, this feature can give the image an unnatural, “plastic” look, so it's best to use it with great caution or, better yet: leave it turned off.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

6.8/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
25%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The motion representation in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the matrix shows no blurring at all. Thanks to this, we can enjoy flawless sharpness in practically any conditions. A big part of this is not only due to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

In contrast to budget constructions, which in dynamic sports scenes may resemble a slideshow, the iFFALCON U85X is a heavyweight contender equipped with a panel featuring a native refresh rate of 144Hz. However, it is worth remembering that in the world of movies, series, or sports, we will mostly operate at 120Hz due to the specifics of image enhancement systems. Such a fast panel is excellent news for gamers and sports fans, as it opens the door to advanced motion settings that simply don't exist in cheaper 60-Hz models.

We manage everything from the "Motion Clarity" menu, where instead of using pre-set, often too aggressive modes, we definitely recommend a custom configuration based on two sliders. The most important of them, reduction of flicker, is responsible for smoothness in films – here, it's best to aim for a value around 4, which will maintain a natural, cinematic character of motion without falling into the artificial "soap opera effect." On the other hand, the first slider, reduction of blur, is the key to success in sports broadcasts. In this case, it's worth going all out and setting it to maximum, ensuring that the image during fast actions on the field remains sharp, and annoying trailing is eliminated.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

OLED950 is almost the perfect TV for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere that the Ambilight system creates during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the solid hardware support. We find literally everything that one should expect from a modern gaming screen today. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the ALLM automatic game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal effortlessly, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most graphically attractive on the market, it fully serves its purpose. It displays all the most important signal parameters and offers useful additions. Gamers can take advantage of the mini-map zoom function or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. Adjusting the contrast range also proves useful. It allows for brightening shadows and achieving better visibility of enemies hidden in the dark corners of the map.

iFFALCON U85X is an exceptional device for gamers that has virtually everything you can expect from a modern screen for consoles or PCs. Here we find two fully-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps, which opens the door to key technologies such as VRR and ALLM, ensuring smooth gameplay without tearing and with minimal latency. The TV handles high refresh rates at various resolutions without any problem, and a real curiosity is the mode that allows for up to 240Hz when dropping to Full HD quality. The entire system is managed by the Game Bar (a faithful copy from TCL), which allows for instant switching of picture modes, customization of the interface appearance, or even adding a virtual crosshair in the middle of the screen.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
17 ms
1080p120
5 ms
9 ms
2160p60
12 ms
17 ms
2160p120
5 ms
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
17 ms
2160p120
5 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
17 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms
9 ms

According to what we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated nearly reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via a controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

The completion of the gaming arsenal is the remarkable latency results that we measured in our tests. With a standard 60Hz signal, the input lag is only 17 ms, which is a completely safe value for comfortable gameplay, while switching to 120Hz reduces the latency to an impressive 9 ms. A nice fact is that these excellent parameters do not deteriorate even in Dolby Vision mode. In many televisions, activating this format still comes with additional processor overhead and increased lag, but here the engineers at TCL (or iFFALCON) did a great job.

Compatibility with PC

6.5/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BWRG
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It works excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. We have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low signal latency. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we examine the readability of the fonts. We're not just talking about the unusual subpixel arrangement of the WOLED panels (BWRG), which in all televisions of this type causes a specific coloration of text edges. The tested model struggles with correctly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colored text on another colorful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artifacts. It's a bit of a shame, although one must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as a monitor for office work, you may feel disappointed.

iFFALCON U85X is also a great candidate for a powerful computer monitor, offering a work culture that is hard to find in typical televisions. The readability of the fonts is at almost an exemplary level – although due to the specifics of the VA panel, it is not as crystal clear as in IPS panels, the difference becomes practically undetectable to the human eye when maintaining a distance of over one meter. The device natively supports a resolution of 4K at 144Hz refresh rate, but the real ace up its sleeve is the 240Hz mode (available at lower resolutions), which makes this giant an excellent tool for fast-paced esports titles, where refresh rate takes priority over pixel count. What is almost most important for PC users, such high performance is fully supported by frame synchronization technologies such as NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync, which effectively eliminates screen tearing and ensures perfect smoothness regardless of the graphic card in use.

Viewing angles

7.6/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
68%

As befits organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where we sit on the sofa while looking at the screen. The only reservation comes when directly comparing the used Tandem OLED matrix with the competition's solutions. Compared to last year's LG panels equipped with the MLA filter or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they still generally maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it's hard to consider this a drawback.

In terms of viewing angles, the iFFALCON U85X does not offer any surprises – it is simply poor, which is a typical characteristic of VA matrix screens. We must treat this as a natural and conscious compromise: when choosing a panel with high contrast and deep blacks, we almost always sacrifice wide viewing angles (only in top-end series do manufacturers use special coatings to improve this feature). The laws of physics in this price segment cannot be deceived, because while sitting directly in front of the television, the picture looks stunning, it only takes a slight lean to the side for the colors to start losing their saturation. If you plan on evening screenings with a larger group, it's a good idea to ensure that everyone sits as close to the central axis of the screen as possible.

Daytime performance

7.3/10

5.6/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

IFFALCON U85X: 419 cd/m2

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

The OLED950 model works perfectly well in really bright rooms without concerns. The key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. In terms of OLED technology, the performance is impressive. It can confidently be stated that in this regard, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant plus for the tested device.

However, there is one drawback that can be described as its Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has used a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It's worth keeping this in mind when planning the TV’s placement relative to windows, as reflections may be visible.

In a bright room, the iFFALCON U85X performs reasonably well, thanks to the satin coating used on the panel. It adequately dampens direct light reflections, allowing us to avoid the irritating mirror effect, although under stronger lighting, one can notice the characteristic warm "spills" of light around the reflecting objects. While it is not on par with top-tier panels featuring the most advanced filters, the absence of high gloss makes daytime use much less burdensome. In terms of pure brightness in SDR standard, that is for television, the TV achieves an average brightness level of around 420 nits. This is not an outstanding result that would allow it to compete with direct sunlight hitting the screen, but it is perfectly sufficient for comfortable viewing in a moderately sunny living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
V8-0012T01-LF1V543.002503
Image processor
MT5896
MT5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details
Review IFFALCON U85X TV Panel details

TV features

6.5/10

7.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review IFFALCON U85X TV features
Review IFFALCON U85X TV features
Review IFFALCON U85X TV features
Review IFFALCON U85X TV features

Smart Features

The biggest advantage of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favor of TitanOS, but here we fortunately still have a fully functional environment based on Android. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, our editorial team was once again unable to launch Windows Miracast, despite the manufacturer declaring that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics," the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most criticisms are directed at the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed, has backlighting, "hybrid" switching between the control of typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charges via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly fades when it turns out you need to point it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Smart Features

Like products from TCL, the iFFALCON U85X benefits from the Google TV system. This means access to an almost unlimited library of applications, from the most popular VOD services to niche tools, as well as full integration with Google and Gemini voice assistants. Apple ecosystem users are also not left out – the television easily works with their devices thanks to the built-in AirPlay feature. The system itself operates quite smoothly, although it's undeniable that it inherits some issues known from TCL models. The interface can sometimes "catch its breath" and needs a moment to think, and Polish translations in the deeper corners of the menu can be quite strange and occasionally illogical.

Classic Features

In terms of traditional television functions, the iFFALCON U85X does not strive for any extravagance and offers the absolute minimum, which may be somewhat disappointing for more demanding users of traditional cable or satellite. It’s futile to look for features like recording programs to external USB memory or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, which would allow following two sources simultaneously. From the more "modern" classics, we only get the ability to wirelessly connect headphones via Bluetooth and teletext support. The remote control also does not pretend to be a modern gadget from the future; it’s a classic design with a full numeric keypad that makes it easier to jump quickly between channels, but visually it strongly diverges from minimalist trends.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.5/10

9.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in file player in the OLED950 model works wonderfully. During our tests, the device handled practically every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks, or photos, the TV played them without any issues. It’s hard to find any weak points in handling the most popular standards. However, if someone still finds something lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not limited to just the default solutions. At any moment, one can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This ensures that the TV can handle literally any file from our home library.

Playing files from a USB drive is no challenge for the iFFALCON U85X – the built-in player handles almost every audio and video format we threw at it during testing without a hitch. The only drawback we could point out is the support for external subtitles; while popular formats like .sub and .srt work flawlessly, the TV can be finicky with .txt files. Fortunately, with the presence of Google TV, this problem can be quickly resolved by installing an external VLC-type application. Still, for most users, the factory tool will probably be more than sufficient to enjoy their own multimedia library without unnecessary hassle.

Sound

8.2/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    83dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The 2.1 speaker system used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a solid dose of quality sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the case, the sound is deep and has a distinct punch. This element is often missing in cheaper models, where the bass is practically nonexistent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That TV, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you're big fans of Ambilight, and the sound issue is taken care of by your external home theater or soundbar.

iFFALCON U85X proves that the absence of the Onkyo or Bang & Olufsen logo on the casing does not have to mean flat and shrill sound. The audio system in this model performs surprisingly well, largely due to the dedicated subwoofer located at the back of the device. Our acoustic measurements confirm that the lower frequencies begin to "respond." It is this discernible "bump" on the graph that accounts for the noticeable dose of bass, which typically provides weight and depth to films and music that are often lacking in televisions. The only criticism one might have is that such bass can overpower the high tones, making them seem a bit muted. Overall, it can deliver sound at a level of up to 83 dBC, which is more than sufficient for amplifying a larger living room.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

83dBC (Max)

75dBC