The Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year's PML9000 model, but it's not a repeat performance. It's clear that the manufacturer has done its homework – first and foremost, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year tended to significantly degrade the viewing experience. Now, the blacks and contrast look much better, and when combined with the Dolby Vision here, even HDR content looks really decent. The picture occasionally shines where it should, and it doesn’t strain the eyes in more challenging scenes. Undoubtedly, the biggest advantage of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a completely new atmosphere – the screen seems to extend beyond its borders, and the entire room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that will be appreciated not only by movie enthusiasts but also by gamers, who, in addition to the lights, get a whole set of features typical for modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. However, there is a significant caveat – this brings us to the most difficult part of this verdict – it is still dual-purpose equipment. On one hand, we have strong picture quality and a unique Ambilight feature, while on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a significant bottleneck, filled with bugs and shortcomings that make the television lag behind the competition. Additionally, the price is not low considering the offered capabilities. Therefore, it's hard to recommend it unequivocally to everyone. However, if you are looking for the brightest Philips screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of features for gamers, and basic applications – the MLED920 will be quite a good choice.
The debut of the Haier brand in the European TV market with the K85F model gives the impression of being rushed, and after thorough testing, it feels almost unfinished. Analyzing this product, we come to a fundamental conclusion: its biggest problem is not the quality of the panel used. Given its price segment, this is simply average, with the typical advantages of VA technology in the form of high contrast and equally typical disadvantages such as poor viewing angles. What actually disqualifies this model as a home entertainment center is the glaring lack of engineering and, above all, software refinement. The list of shortcomings is long and starts from the first contact with the device. Careless assembly, which could have been avoided at the quality control stage, a poorly optimized and poorly translated Google TV system, and annoying issues with such basic functions as pairing the remote—these all contribute to the picture of a product that seems to have been released to market without due diligence. The catastrophic picture quality in HDR mode, resulting not only from low brightness but also from a complete lack of intelligent adaptation to the signal, only adds to this disappointing image. However, it turns out that this model has its second, surprising face. It is enough to look at it not through the prism of a home TV, but rather as a large and cheap display for special tasks. Then its shortcomings take a backseat, and unexpected advantages come to the forefront: an exceptionally well-functioning media player with USB, outstanding font readability from a PC, and access to a huge database of applications. In such a role—as a screen in a conference room, hotel lobby, or simple advertising player—the Haier K85F performs surprisingly well. For the typical user seeking a reliable and simply well-functioning TV for the living room in 2025, however, the Haier K85F is a proposition that is extremely difficult to recommend with a clear conscience. It is a product full of contradictions that fails in its primary function intended by the manufacturer on too many fronts.