Philips MLED920 / MLED910 vs Dreame S100

Direct comparison

MLED920 / MLED910

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.5

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.8

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    7.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    4.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.5

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    5.5

    5.9

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.2

    8.3

Advantages

  • Solid black and high contrast thanks to mini-LED backlighting

  • HDR brightness reaching 700–800 nits in real movie scenes

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Ambilight – a feature that adds atmosphere, especially in the evening

  • Lots of supported audio formats: DTS:X, Dolby Atmos, Dolby True HD 7.1

  • 144 Hz panel with support for VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Loud sound (up to 88 dB)

  • Illuminated remote

  • Great viewing angles (thanks to the ADS matrix)

  • Decent blacks thanks to Mini-LED backlighting

  • Good colors thanks to the PFS filter (advertised as QLED)

  • High motion fluidity (144 Hz panel)

  • Low input lag (in game mode)

  • A lot of gaming features, including two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR, ALLM, and Game Bar)

  • Google TV system with a rich library of apps

  • Good sound thanks to the built-in "soundbar"

Disadvantages

No like
  • Titan OS is quite underdeveloped – there are significant bugs and deficiencies in the applications

  • Few user features

  • Hybrid infrared remote control

  • Issues with the fluidity of tonal transitions in dark scenes

  • The TV is not suitable (aside from gaming) for collaboration with a PC – strong dithering and poor readability of fonts, especially colored ones and on dark backgrounds

  • Underdeveloped local dimming algorithms (may cause annoying brightness drops)

  • Outdated image processor and poor digital processing of the Google TV system

  • Software bugs, occasional stuttering

  • Useless Filmmaker mode (completely blocks any change to picture settings)

  • Poor implementation of HDR format in games (lack of HGiG support and high input lag in Dolby Vision mode)

Our verdict

The Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year's PML9000 model, but it's not a repeat performance. It's clear that the manufacturer has done its homework – first and foremost, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year tended to significantly degrade the viewing experience. Now, the blacks and contrast look much better, and when combined with the Dolby Vision here, even HDR content looks really decent. The picture occasionally shines where it should, and it doesn’t strain the eyes in more challenging scenes. Undoubtedly, the biggest advantage of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a completely new atmosphere – the screen seems to extend beyond its borders, and the entire room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that will be appreciated not only by movie enthusiasts but also by gamers, who, in addition to the lights, get a whole set of features typical for modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. However, there is a significant caveat – this brings us to the most difficult part of this verdict – it is still dual-purpose equipment. On one hand, we have strong picture quality and a unique Ambilight feature, while on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a significant bottleneck, filled with bugs and shortcomings that make the television lag behind the competition. Additionally, the price is not low considering the offered capabilities. Therefore, it's hard to recommend it unequivocally to everyone. However, if you are looking for the brightest Philips screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of features for gamers, and basic applications – the MLED920 will be quite a good choice.

Dreame S100 is a successful, albeit still somewhat raw, debut in the Mini-LED segment. The hardware of the TV stands up for itself: the Mini-LED technology with local dimming provides deep and attractive blacks for the average viewer, while the IPS/ADS matrix offers brilliant viewing angles. This is an interesting combination, as it is extremely rare in the LCD TV segment, which will certainly please those with wide living rooms or large corner sofas. If we add to this a full package for gamers (HDMI 2.1, 144 Hz), the Google TV system with an almost endless number of applications, and a very powerful 4.1.2 sound system with a power of 70 W, which performs well above the market average, we get an incredibly versatile screen.

Where's the catch? In the software. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 suffers from typical "growing pains" – the outdated processor doesn't quite handle advanced digital processing, and the local dimming algorithms can be irritating in more demanding scenes. Additionally, the Google TV system itself can occasionally experience slight stutters. So, if you're looking for a well-equipped Mini-LED for a wide living room and are willing to forgive it for minor system hiccups, which the manufacturer can fix with future updates – it's a very interesting option. The hardware potential is enormous, although the software still needs some final polishing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.9/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 144 (12 x 12)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

298,900:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

38,500:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

23,950:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,000:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

32,850:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

11,800:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,900:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,650:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Philips MLED920 in the 55-inch version that we had the opportunity to test uses a high-contrast VA panel. The panel itself is one thing, but the true distinguishing feature of this model is the mini-LED backlighting. This largely determines how black levels and contrast appear – and it must be said that Philips has made a significant leap forward compared to the models from 2024, where the local dimming algorithms performed just mediocrely. In this new version, it's much better, and the contrast presented by the MLED920 can really pleasantly surprise. At times, it even resembles the level known from the best LCD TVs on the market – blacks can be deep, the image gains three-dimensionality, and viewing sessions in a dark room create a great impression. Of course, as is the case with any mini-LED TV, this is not an image entirely free from compromises. With a large amount of fine details on the screen, the local dimming algorithms can sometimes get confused – sometimes dimming details more than we would like, and at other times brightening the background, resulting in slight light blue halos around objects (the so-called halo effect). Despite these imperfections, we must emphasize that black levels and contrast are truly a strong point of the Philips MLED920 and definitely one of the reasons to consider it in the mid-range.

Dreame S100 is a Mini-LED television that in the 65" version uses an IPS/ADS panel. Such a panel does not naturally offer the best contrast on the market, but thanks to a fairly dense Mini-LED backlight, the black levels in this model are quite decent. In less demanding scenes, the contrast could reach values of 30,000:1. This is several times higher and virtually impossible to achieve for any type of LCD panel without local dimming technology. This makes the black levels and contrast in the S100 quite appealing for a less demanding viewer.

Unfortunately, in more demanding shots where a substantial number of small elements appear on a black background, the local dimming algorithms in the Dreame S100 do not work perfectly. The television can become either excessively dark, resulting in super deep blacks, but almost nothing is visible on the screen, or go in the other direction – a large number of details are visible, but the contrast results are very poor. The black levels in very demanding scenes around bright objects take on a grayish hue (halo effect). This is a typical limitation of Mini-LED televisions from the lower and mid-range, and unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not an exception that handles this problem particularly well. However, it should be noted that generally, the contrast and black levels are definitely better here than in LCD televisions without any local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

5/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 89.9%, Bt.2020: 65.6%
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 71.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

722 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

775 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

131 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

503 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

71 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

42 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Dreame S100

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

In our measurements, the Philips MLED920 achieved even around 900 nits in static tests, which is a really solid result for a mid-range TV. In practice, this translates to a lot of satisfaction during viewing sessions – in scenes rich in bright light, such as the first, third, or fifth test screens, the screen was able to generate about 700 nits, which is enough to feel the true "HDR effect." However, it cannot be denied that the limited number of backlighting zones and the compromises of mini-LED dimming algorithms in more demanding scenes reveal their nature. In sequences with small light sources – such as the moon or a scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the television clearly prioritizes maintaining deeper blacks at the expense of the brightness of those small elements. For most viewers, this is still a reasonable compromise, as the dark background tends to look much better, though one must be aware that the details themselves may not impress with intensity. There is also some disappointment regarding colors. Although the applied PFS filter (the equivalent of quantum dots known from QLEDs) does its job and colors appear quite vivid, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color space reaches "only" 90%. In everyday viewing, this will be sufficient, but in extremely colorful productions – such as the latest Disney animations – one can notice that some tones are not as vibrant as they could be in other constructions.

The Dreame S100 is a relatively bright television. In movie mode, the brightness we measured reached about 600 nits. This is a really good result, although not the highest, considering the capabilities of the competition in this price range. In fullscreen scenes, it is evident that the television can generate an image that strikes with brightness. Unfortunately, when more complex scenes appeared on the screen, the local dimming algorithm in this model tried above all to maintain the deepest blacks. However, this came at the expense of HDR effect – and in a drastic way. In such scenes, the brightness of bright elements dropped below 100 nits, which is a truly tragic result, far from any HDR effect. This aspect can be improved, though not without any "buts." It is enough to change the local dimming setting in the television's menu, but then the blacks in such scenes simply turn gray. It’s a pity that Dreame could not refine the local dimming algorithms better, and the S100 is another example that the mere number of local dimming zones does not always translate into better image quality. As a consolation, it is worth adding that the Dreame S100 is advertised as a "QLED" television, although in reality it utilizes a PFS LED filter. As a result, the colors are appropriately saturated, and the color gamut coverage we measured exceeded 94% of the DCI-P3 palette.

Factory color reproduction

5/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Like every Philips television we tested, we primarily evaluated the MLED920 in Filmmaker mode – this is supposed to be the "most honest" mode, designed for films and to faithfully convey the creators' intentions. Indeed, in terms of colorimetry, it performs the best among all the modes available on the television, but it is not without its flaws. The first thing that stands out is the white balance. The image has a slight tendency to take on purple-pink tones, which gives it a somewhat unnatural character. However, an even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned earlier – image clipping. Just look at the gamma or EOTF graphs to see that the line deviates significantly beyond the norm, falling below the value of 1.8. In practice, this means "clipping" the brightest whites, where the image becomes almost milky. Fortunately, most of these issues can be corrected – the MLED920 responds to calibration, and with a few adjustments, the image quality can be significantly improved.

We tested the Dreame S100 in "movie" mode and definitely recommend using this setting for watching all kinds of content. Interestingly, in the deeper settings of the TV, we also find a dedicated "Filmmaker" mode, which is available today from almost every manufacturer. However, in the case of the Dreame S100, we do not recommend using it – it blocks all image-related settings and does not allow any configuration in the menu - not even motion smoothing. So how do the factory colors perform on the S100? Not too bad, but also not great. The TV itself was quite heavily tinted with blue components, which is clearly visible in our white balance measurements. This caused the image to be artificially brightened, and the colors had a slight bluish tint. This is confirmed by the Color Checker palette, which showed how color samples leaned towards blue, generating quite significant color errors. The image in HDR mode looked definitely better, where color errors were not as prominently visible, though they still fell far from ideal. Here, the white balance was also too heavily skewed towards the blue color, which caused quite significant errors in color reproduction.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we managed to largely tame the white balance – to the extent that the average viewer will not be able to detect color inaccuracies. The characteristic pink-purple glow that previously disturbed the naturalness of the picture has also disappeared. The color palette has been organized, and the colors appear more consistent and neutral. The gamma in SDR content after calibration looks really good – there's no sign of the earlier “bleeding” effect in bright scenes. The picture has become more contrasted and devoid of the milkiness that previously spoiled the perception significantly. In the case of HDR content, the improvement is also noticeable, although it is still evident that the television is “doing its own thing.” The EOTF curve cannot be fully shaped, as Philips simply does not provide tools in its settings that allow for precise control over this parameter. In many films, the television simply still showcases the image “in its own way.” Despite these limitations, calibration has brought quite a lot of good – it has managed to minimize most of the color inaccuracies and significantly improve the overall balance of the picture. However, it must be remembered that certain barriers arise from the very hardware construction and they simply cannot be overcome.

The Dreame S100 turned out to be a device very susceptible to professional calibration. In its menu, we found a whole array of advanced options that allowed us to effectively correct factory errors. Thanks to advanced white balance correction – both in SDR and HDR content – we completely eliminated excess blue components. The image immediately became much more natural and pleasant to view. After fully tuning the colors, errors in the Color Checker test dropped below Delta E values of 2-3. For the average viewer, this means that any color distortions have become nearly impossible to notice with the naked eye. This is a really nice surprise, as often new brands in the television market have significant problems with proper implementation and functioning of sliders in the calibration menu. Here, everything worked as it should. The only thing we need to criticize is the way the television manages its brightness in HDR. Due to the specific nature of the local dimming algorithms, we observed anomalies in the EOTF curve we measured. In the areas where high highlights should appear, there is a slight uplift of the curve above the reference line. In practice, this results in unnatural brightening of some of the brightest elements in movies or games. Despite this minor flaw, professional calibration brings a huge, very positive change to this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Philips MLED920 is not its strongest suit. In our tests, we quickly noticed that the television has noticeable problems in darker scenes – for example, segments from the movie The Green Knight or test grayscale palettes. There, you can see the characteristic banding of colors and too sharp transitions between shades, which can be quite noticeable in productions with a darker style. Fortunately, the situation looks better in brighter scenes – there the image appears smooth and free of major artifacts.

The transition between individual shades on the Dreame S100 is quite good. Analyzing most content in HDR10 format, we did not notice significant issues with banding. Only some very extreme and dark scenes revealed a problem with contouring of shades. However, the situation is a bit worse with content in Dolby Vision* format. Here, the color gradation clearly worsens, and the tonal transitions from one color to another are more visible and distinct from each other. Therefore, the rating of this element on our site is slightly lower when considering viewing (on streaming platforms) in this format.

*we will add photos after modifying the site 😉

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The manufacturer equipped this model with several features that improve signal quality, and although we usually approach such "enhancers" with skepticism, they turn out to be really helpful here. The key option is called "distortion reduction" – it works best at a medium level because, on one hand, it effectively smooths out unwanted banding and color transitions, while on the other, it doesn't excessively cut details, which keeps the image looking natural.

The situation is a bit worse with upscaling. Lower quality materials – such as test videos with models – appeared soft and lacking in sharpness. Yes, this can be somewhat corrected with the sharpness slider in the menu, but the effect still remains far from what competitors in a similar price range offer. Philips therefore still needs to work on this aspect because, in light of the successful improvement of tonal transitions, the upscaling simply performs poorly.

The scaling and digital processing in the Dreame S100 is handled by a technology that the manufacturer proudly calls Dreamind™ Pro AI. However, it is essential to clarify that this is not a proprietary processor but merely a marketing name for a chip from MediaTek – specifically, the model MT5889. Unfortunately, we are talking about quite an outdated unit, from the time when MediaTek lagged significantly behind the competition in terms of performance. This, unfortunately, has a direct impact on the image, as this chip is responsible for that as well. The upscaling in the S100 is rather mediocre, and the processor tends to strongly and artificially sharpen edges (fortunately, this can be somewhat tempered with the sharpness slider in the menu). In the options, we also find a "Contour Smoothing" function, which theoretically is supposed to improve tonal transitions. In practice, it brings almost no improvement – setting it to any level rarely eliminates visible color banding but can unnecessarily blur elements of the image that should remain sharp.

A separate problem is the phenomenon of overscan (clipping the edges of the frame), which is almost always visible here. Although there is an option to set the screen to display the full frame in low-resolution materials, it requires activating the aforementioned Filmmaker mode. And as you already know, this mode completely blocks any other adjustments in the image menu. In our test tables, we noted that the television offers the option to disable overscan, as technically such a feature exists in the system – however, in everyday use, with reasonable image settings, you will not be able to take advantage of it.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.7/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The Philips MLED920 features a 144 Hz panel, which immediately suggests that we shouldn’t complain about motion smoothness. And indeed – the motion blur is relatively low here for a VA panel, and although one might occasionally notice slight issues on darker backgrounds, they are not something that most people would notice during regular viewing.

A major plus is the presence of a motion smoother called "Motion Style." It allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences – if someone prefers a more “theatrical,” almost television-like image, they can increase the sliders, and if they want to preserve the natural “jitter” of a cinematic frame, they just need to set lower values. This way, everyone can find the perfect balance.

When it comes to motion fluidity, the Dreame S100 performs really well. It features a panel with a 144 Hz refresh rate, although in reality, the vast majority of users using it in a traditional way will still be limited to 120 Hz (because today's equipment, apart from PCs, only allows for such values). Thanks to the high refresh rate, the image in motion remains really sharp, largely due to the well-functioning MEMC fluidity enhancer. In the menu, we find predefined modes that allow the TV to efficiently add artificial frames, which effectively improves the fluidity of dynamic sports shots, but also helps get rid of image stuttering in film and series materials recorded at 24 frames.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gamers, the Philips MLED920 is truly a complete tool. The manufacturer has taken care of everything that today is considered standard in televisions designed for consoles and PCs. It features ALLM, so the console automatically switches the screen to game mode, it has VRR and 144 Hz refresh rate, which guarantees smooth gameplay even in fast titles. All key HDR formats are supported – including HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming for Xbox – which means that regardless of what you are playing and on which console, the TV will be able to extract maximum potential from the image. In everyday gaming, the Game Bar also proves to be useful – a relatively simple implementation by Philips, but a functional panel where you can quickly check image parameters, turn on VRR, or adjust details without leaving the game. It may not be as advanced as the competition's offerings, but it performs its job flawlessly. And lastly, something that distinguishes Philips from its competitors – Ambilight. The three-sided LED backlighting can make a huge impression in games, especially in the evening. It also provides a way to slightly "expand" the screen and feel greater immersion. And since colorful LEDs have recently become almost a mandatory element of a gamer’s room, the MLED920 fits into this trend perfectly.

The Dreame S100 seems almost like the perfect screen for gamers. The TV is equipped with 2 HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, which means that features such as Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) and Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) synchronization in the range of 48-144 Hz work seamlessly on consoles. It also has a well-designed game panel (Game Bar) that allows you to continuously check the most important parameters – from active picture modes to the number of frames rendered by the console, and even the ability to add a crosshair in the center of the screen. All of this looks great on paper, but the biggest issue with the S100 is the implementation of HDR mode in games. The TV does not have a properly implemented HGiG format. As a result, an unsuspecting user may incorrectly configure the console during the initial setup of the display. A wrong configuration can lead to a picture that is too dark or too bright (as a guideline: we suggest setting the brightness in the Xbox console menu to about 600 nits, and in the PS5 to 12 clicks). The Dolby Vision format is also problematic; it often just would not activate at all when using the XBOX – Dreame S100 line. And when it was managed to be activated, gaming was impossible due to a very high input lag that often exceeded 100ms. If the manufacturer can improve the HDR issue in games through an update, the S100 will be truly excellent equipment for gamers. For now, however, one must reckon with compromises.

Input lag

9.6/10

9.2/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
15 ms
1080p120
9 ms
6 ms
2160p60
17 ms
15 ms
2160p120
9 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
15 ms
2160p120
9 ms
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
35 ms
127 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms
18 ms

Input lag on the Philips MLED920 is really very good – in 120 Hz mode, we measured values below 10 ms, placing this model among the absolute leaders of LCD televisions in terms of responsiveness. Even at 60 Hz, a result of around 18 ms is fully acceptable and won’t hinder any type of gameplay. A certain exception is the Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, where the lag can increase to even 35 ms. This result might be slightly noticeable for esports players, but we must honestly admit – for the majority of so-called “casual gamers,” it will be absolutely unnoticeable. Especially since we’re talking about values that still allow for comfortable gaming without major compromises.

Aside from the aforementioned problem with Dolby Vision, the input lag on the Dreame S100 is really very low. Values around 5-6 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12-15 ms for 60 Hz are such excellent results that even a professional gamer won't be able to feel any delay during gameplay. The response to movements on the controller is almost instantaneous here.

Compatibility with PC

4/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Average
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

When it comes to working with a PC, the Philips MLED920 evokes rather mixed feelings. On one hand, it looks impressive on paper – we have 144 Hz, support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so in terms of gaming on a PC, the television does not disappoint. Anyone looking for a large screen for computer gaming gets a solid package of features here. However, when we try to use it as a typical monitor for daily work, its limitations quickly become apparent. The fonts do not look their best – there is noticeable strong dithering, colorful letters can be jagged, and with very dark text, strange anomalies appear, as if the panel loses thin lines and has trouble accurately reproducing them. In short: Yes for PC gaming. For any work and reading text: a firm no.

The Dreame S100 performs well as a large gaming monitor. It has a 144 Hz panel and easily supports G-Sync and FreeSync. The problem arises when you want to work with text on it. Due to a software bug, the television does not handle full color sampling (Chroma 4:4:4) at 120 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates, causing the fonts to appear blurry. To make the text perfectly sharp, you need to manually lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz in Windows. This is quite an irritating solution that forces constant switching between settings if you want to use this screen for both work and gaming.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
68%
68%

The viewing angles on the MLED920 are classic for VA matrix technology – even a slight shift from the center causes the colors to begin to fade, the contrast weakens, and the overall picture becomes quite flat and unattractive. There are no miracles here. So if you’re watching movies with a larger group and everyone is sitting a bit off to the side, this will be slightly noticeable. On the other hand, you gain something for this: thanks to this matrix, the MLED920 can display a much deeper black than televisions with IPS panels.

The viewing angles on the Dreame S100 are really good, thanks to the ADS panel. Unlike VA panels, this type of screen allows you to view the image at a steep angle without a noticeable loss in color saturation and brightness. This comes at the cost of worse native contrast; however, for most viewers (especially those with a wide couch), it will be quite a good compromise. There is a lack of Mini-LED TVs with good viewing angles at a reasonable price on the market today, so the S100 nicely fills this niche.

Daytime performance

5.5/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Dreame S100: 463 cd/m2

Philips MLED920 / MLED910: 421 cd/m2

The Philips MLED920 performs fairly well in everyday use. The satin coating on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and in most moderately sunny living rooms, it manages unwanted glare. However, it is important to remember that this is not a television that impresses with brightness – the average value in SDR hovers around 450 nits. In very bright rooms, especially with large south-facing windows, the screen may not always overcome intense daylight. In such situations, it's worth supporting it with at least light curtains so that viewing comfort doesn't suffer significantly.

The Dreame S100 easily performs well in most living rooms during the day. The television is equipped with a satin finish on the screen – while it may not perfectly reduce reflections, it does an excellent job of preserving color saturation, which does not fade when the room is bright. In terms of pure brightness, the S100 features a moderately bright screen. At peak brightness in SDR format, it can reach about 600 nits. Such a reserve allows it to be placed in a typically sunlit room, although – let's be honest – it is not a brightness demon, and it may struggle with direct, harsh sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN258E_V058.002.179.041
RTMA.250416.179
Image processor
mt5889 3GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

Dreame S100

TV features

5.5/10

5.9/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Decent
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV – Titan OS

Philips MLED920 uses the proprietary Titan OS, which is just beginning its journey in the TV market, and unfortunately, this is evident at every turn. On one hand, we have basic features – such as support for AirPlay or the ability to mirror the screen from a smartphone, but on the other hand, its limitations quickly become apparent. Screen mirroring works only with a phone, but not with a laptop. Voice search? Yes, but it is only supported by Amazon Alexa and in languages supported by this assistant. The system runs fairly quickly, but every now and then it can "fail" and gives the impression of something unfinished, still developing.

Classic TV Functions

Titan OS does not pamper in terms of classic TV functions either. Besides the hybrid remote with a numeric keypad – which, although illuminated and cleverly designed in two modes, unfortunately works via infrared – we won't find anything that could truly distinguish the MLED920 from the competition. There is no USB recording or PiP function, and such solutions could be useful in this class. From unusual additions, we have an analog output in the form of a jack, which allows connecting headphones or older speakers. It’s a small nod to users who still use older equipment.

Ambilight TV

What definitely diverts attention from the shortcomings of Titan OS is the unique, three-sided Ambilight system. Here, Philips still plays in its own league and can amaze those who have not encountered this addition. The colorful lighting that responds to screen content gives screenings a unique atmosphere and is something that the competition does not offer in a similar form. It is Ambilight that is meant to ensure that other issues – both system and functional – take a back seat.

Smart TV: Google TV

Dreame S100 uses the Google TV operating system. This is great news for anyone looking for a TV with access to almost all streaming apps on the market. The system operates quite smoothly, although it occasionally experiences slight stutters – which is a classic issue in most Chinese TVs with Google software. On board, we find almost every necessary Smart TV feature, including screen mirroring and voice search using Google Assistant. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 lacks support for AirPlay, so iPhone users won't be able to easily share content from their phones.

TV Features

Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not a TV designed for traditional television viewers. Apart from basic options for connecting headphones or a fairly simple remote control equipped with a numeric keypad, we won't find virtually any additional features to facilitate everyday viewing of traditional channels. The only nice and, recently, quite rarely found addition is the presence of a physical headphone jack output. This allows for the connection of older wired headphones or analog audio sets.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.5/10

8.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player in the Philips MLED920 works quite well and handles most popular audio and video files without major issues – exactly as you can see in our test table. There is no need to worry about typical movie or music formats. We can only nitpick about the somewhat selective support for photo formats and certain resolutions.

The built-in media player works well and handled most of the files we provided from our flash drive without any issues. However, there were instances when the application experienced slight stuttering, and selected movies or photos took several seconds to load. If the factory player turned out to be not very intuitive for you or lacked advanced features, the Google TV system comes to the rescue. Just enter the app store and install any external file playback program (e.g., VLC) that will solve this problem.

Sound

6.2/10

8.3/10

  • Maximum volume
    88dB
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound in the Philips MLED920 is probably not going to be the element that impresses you the most. It sounds rather flat, lacking depth and clearer bass, which means that movies or concerts don’t have the extra layer of immersion that a better audio system can provide. However, it must be noted that the volume is really decent – the TV can reach up to 88 decibels. A big plus of the MLED920 is not so much the sound quality itself, but the support for audio formats. Philips has ensured compatibility with nearly all the major standards, including Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Dolby TrueHD 7.1. As a result, if someone decides to connect an external soundbar or receiver, they will encounter no limitations and will be able to enjoy the fullness of cinematic sound.

The sound of the Dreame S100 is one of the greatest advantages of this model – it is really good. The TV is equipped with a 4.1.2 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. The sound is clean, with distinctly perceivable bass, which is confirmed by our acoustic measurements. Large drivers placed on the sides of the cabinet effectively widen the soundstage. As a result, we get a noticeably more spacious sound than with standard 20-watt 2.0 systems. The device supports Dolby Atmos encoding, so we can easily play spatial audio tracks from streaming platforms without the need to purchase an external soundbar. Unfortunately, it lacks support for the DTS format – this is a downside, although we must honestly admit that this standard has recently been abandoned by most manufacturers. On the positive side, the audio connection options are commendable. The Dreame S100 can easily be connected to newer home theaters or soundbars via the HDMI eARC port or optical output. A nice and increasingly rare addition is the classic minijack headphone jack, which gives a second life to older audio sets.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

88dBC (Max)

75dBC

84dBC (Max)

75dBC