Panasonic W85 vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Amazon FireTV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.1

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.5

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.8

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.8

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    7.7

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    4.2

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    6.8

    7.0

  • Apps

    7.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    6.5

Advantages

  • VA matrix with high native contrast

  • High refresh rate 120/144 Hz

  • Two HDMI 2.1 ports supporting ALLM, VRR, and Dolby Vision in games

  • Very low input lag

  • Quite good color gamut coverage thanks to the QLED filter

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Sturdy central base

  • Great compatibility with PC – full 4:4:4 chroma, readable fonts

  • Very good contrast and black: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Pretty high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional mode for gamers: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide range of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness (below 270 nits) – no real HDR

  • HDR mode in games is poorly developed, with incorrect HGiG implementation

  • Weak media file player

  • The FireTV system in Europe is poorly developed: there are micro stutters and awkward translations, and many apps are missing

  • Average sound quality, lacking depth

  • Motion smoothing doesn't want to work

  • The matrix is heavily smudged

  • Strong visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor system errors

  • Significant chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

The Panasonic W85B is a TV that aims to prove that the Japanese brand can produce not only top-tier devices but also something more "for the people." And it really does look decent on paper: a VA panel with solid contrast, high refresh rates of 120/144 Hz, two full HDMI 2.1 ports, and low input lag. It sounds like a great setup for a gamer or someone just looking for an affordable TV with good fundamentals. However, the reality is a bit more complicated. The W85B performs well mainly with SDR content, especially after calibration, and will serve well for typical everyday use. But when we start expecting more from it—for example, counting on strong HDR performance or greater immersion in games with that mode activated—the TV quickly shows its limitations. Its brightness is low and the lack of local dimming becomes quite noticeable during evening viewing. Therefore, we view the W85B more as a "daily" TV—ideal for someone who watches terrestrial television, YouTube, or SDR streaming, and wants to connect a console or PC for 120/144 Hz (but without HDR). In that role, it performs very well. Is it a TV for everyone? Definitely not. But if we accept its limitations and approach it with reasonable expectations, the W85B can provide a lot of enjoyment for a relatively sensible price.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. And indeed, in many ways it's a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good black levels and brightness that rivals more expensive models. In fact, it's identical to the slightly more expensive C6K model, which we've already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features, making it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the positive impression is marred by the performance of the panel used. The television suffers from noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) makes the image often appear unnatural and artificial—as if it were being forced to be sharper. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS isn’t its flaws, but rather its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or just slightly less) as the full-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete design without those annoying flaws. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition—if its price drops drastically. For now, opting for the (often symbolic) additional cost to the C6K model remains a much safer and better choice. One could mischievously state that the letter "S" in the name actually stands for "Slim." It's just that it's not about an exceptionally slim case, but about how much this model has been "slimmed down" in terms of capabilities compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

3,150:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The W85B is Panasonic's entry-level LCD, so one shouldn't expect miracles in this category, but... the VA panel really does a great job here. Its biggest advantage is simply better contrast than in popular IPS panels – blacks often look gray there, while here you can actually see deeper tones. In the scenes we tested, the contrast held around 4000:1, which translates to roughly four times better performance than in IPS panels. Of course, there's no local dimming, so in difficult conditions, when it gets really dark in the room, black can resemble navy more than absolute pitch black. This is the difference you can see compared to OLEDs or Mini-LEDs. But in everyday viewing – a series, a match, a movie in the evening in the living room – this contrast is more than sufficient. The image has the right depth, and the W85B doesn't give the feeling of a "washed-out" television.

Let's move on to what tigers like best, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) was due to drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black levels and contrast. In direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model hardly falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we find a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. What’s most interesting – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests, we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones in the C6KS (of the same size) as in the tested more expensive counterpart! The black levels are very good. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major issues that often plague budget models without local dimming. Of course, we can't cheat physics. We must expect that in very demanding scenes (e.g., bright text on a black background), we will sometimes notice undesirable effects such as blooming (halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – overall, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

4.2/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.6%, Bt.2020: 75.0%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

249 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

283 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

282 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Panasonic W85

Unfortunately, we don't have good news here. The Panasonic W85B is rather dim – its peak brightness does not exceed 300 nits, so it's hard to talk about any true HDR effect. In practice, this means that scenes which on other screens can "shine" and make an impression, here look simply like regular SDR with a slight boost in colors. Our measurements and film tests confirmed this – regardless of the content, the W85B won't extract anything more from HDR. So if someone is looking for a TV specifically for HDR, it's better to look towards other models. As a consolation, the fact remains that in terms of colors, the W85B performs quite well. It's a QLED TV, so its color gamut coverage is wide, and most films and series look natural, without a distinct "washed out" effect. The colors are saturated, so during regular viewing, there is no sense that something is quite wrong.

And how does the issue of HDR look? Here the C6KS performs quite well and – as is becoming a recurring theme in this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must remember the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible black levels. It’s a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, “true black” more than additional micro-details that could cause grayness on the screen. Such is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It’s also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the tagline of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colors are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide color gamut reaches 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

4.2/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

While testing the Panasonic W85B, we of course started with the Filmmaker mode, as it is the gold standard today for watching content "as the director intended." The problem is that this TV is quite far from those intentions. The biggest issue turned out to be an excess of red – in both SDR and HDR. The picture often looked overly warm, and in some scenes, it appeared almost "blazing." Additionally, there’s the issue of brightness management. When we looked at the gamma and EOTF charts, it was clear as day that in most scenes, the TV brightens the image more than it should. The effect was easy to predict. Details can get lost, leading to flattening and clipping across the entire screen. Of course, we know how to improve this, but it must be said honestly that it requires quite a bit of work in calibration. Out of the box, the W85B does not provide a reference-level picture – it is rather a TV that will always interpret colors and brightness a bit "its own way" without professional adjustments. Unfortunately, this is to the detriment of the viewer.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option labeled Filmmaker Mode in the menu. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of color reproduction, the absence of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers nearly identical picture characteristics to the aforementioned Filmmaker mode in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. So if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colors – the answer is: no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

6.9/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Fortunately, calibration made a significant difference for the Panasonic W85B, especially in SDR content. Here, the improvement was really noticeable – we managed to balance the white and reasonably tame the TV's tendency to excessively brighten the entire image. The picture became more coherent, and the colors gained a naturalness that was lacking in the factory settings. Admittedly, the results from the Color Checker are not perfect, as the W85B has visible issues with green saturation, but overall, we assess the post-calibration effect in SDR very positively. The situation with HDR is a bit different. Here, we were also able to limit the tendency to warm up the entire scene, so the image turned out much better than in the factory settings. However, the same problem we mentioned earlier is still evident – the TV interprets the image too "in its own way" and brightens the entire frame. The lack of local dimming only exacerbates this effect. In summary, briefly in SDR content, the W85B performs really well after calibration and is perfectly suitable for everyday viewing. However, in HDR, even after adjustments, it is still hard to unequivocally recommend it for serious viewing sessions.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the tendency of the C69KS to distort colors has been effectively reduced, leading to a very good final effect. After calibration, we won't see excessive warmth in SDR scenes or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it's worth noting the brightness characteristic. In SDR content, there are hardly any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programs, or materials from YouTube. It is much more difficult to evaluate the performance of the television in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behavior, but its practical variant shows certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times it can dim the entire scene. Calibration has therefore brought clear benefits in terms of color reproduction, but certain limitations arising from the operation of local dimming and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be avoided, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.1/10

4.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Here we can confidently praise the Panasonic W85B. The television handles color blending and tonal transitions really remarkably. Gradients look smooth, without visible bands or artificial outlines. As a result, the image gains a natural quality, and sequences with a lot of subtle shades – like the sky or blurred backgrounds – look exceptionally good for this class of equipment.

Looking solely at the smoothness of tonal transitions, the C69KS gives no real reason for complaints. The gradation of colors proceeds correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. Therefore, you might be surprised by the low score in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final score is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
No
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

With native SDR content, the Panasonic W85B performs very well – tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without artificial bands or clear contours. However, the situation looks worse with lower resolution materials. This is where the television has the biggest problem with "beautifying" the image. The lack of any option in the menu that would allow for improving gradation means that with older films or materials from YouTube, one can sometimes notice slight issues with color blending.

Fortunately, upscaling, or increasing the quality of lower resolution content, performs much better. This is definitely a strong point of this model – the image is scaled cleanly and in detail, and the television handles this better than one might expect from such an affordable device. This is thanks to the HCX processor, which Panasonic has been developing for years, and it shows that even in the lower series, it can do a good job.

C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a significant amount of detail is preserved, and the algorithm adds a subtle "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. However, the smoothing of tonal transitions is lacking. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a somewhat raw state. With older materials, this can be simply exhausting, as the lack of additional processing highlights all imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

6.5/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
77%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

At first glance, everything looks good – the Panasonic W85B has a 120 Hz panel and even a 144 Hz mode, so it seems that it should handle smooth motion well. The problem begins when we look into the settings. The options for improving fluidity are supposedly present in the menu, but in practice… they change nothing. No matter what we choose, the image looks the same. On top of that, there's a lack of BFI, which is the black frame insertion mode that helps sharpen motion in many TVs. And suddenly, it turns out that despite having a strong panel, the W85B doesn't give us any real tools to adjust that motion to our needs. It only works well when the source itself operates at a higher frequency – for example, games at 120 Hz. But when it comes to movies or sports, we just have to take what the TV shows us, because there's nothing more we can do about it.

C69KS offers a simplified motion improvement panel in movies, allowing you to adjust the intensity of the effect using a slider. This makes it easy to match the smoothness to your own preferences. The possibility of using higher refresh rates is also a plus – even though the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p allows you to enable 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, but in practice, the image at these settings suffers from significant motion blur. The effect is noticeable enough that the overall experience feels simply mediocre and loses its appeal in everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.5/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

On paper, the Panasonic W85B looks really solid. Here we have two full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for ALLM, variable refresh rate, Dolby Vision in games, and of course, a high refresh rate for the panel itself. Additionally, there’s the characteristic Panasonic game bar that allows you to check key parameters with one click and quickly change them if necessary. Sounds great, but the problem arises when we activate HDR. Here, the W85B significantly falters because it lacks proper HGiG implementation – the TV manages brightness poorly, and instead of faithful image rendering, we get scenes that are too bright, sometimes even blown out. The solution? The simplest – turn off HDR in the console settings and leave everything in SDR. And here it gets really interesting, because in this scenario, the W85B shows its better side. Low input lag, high smoothness thanks to 120 Hz – all of this makes gaming look phenomenal. Yes, HDR can be sacrificed, but if responsiveness and smooth gameplay are priorities, the W85B provides a lot of fun.

If we overlook the smearing and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything you can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a reasonably functioning HGiG. The TV can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings during gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a truly successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
9 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
17 ms
9 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
9 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
9 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

There is really nothing to be afraid of here. The Panasonic W85B reacts instantly to our movements, and the values measured in tests can easily compete with gaming monitors. With a 120 Hz signal, the input lag is around 8–10 ms, and at 60 Hz it hovers around 17–20 ms. In practice, this means one thing – no delays, no frustration! You press the button, and the action happens right away on the screen.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, which makes reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The Panasonic W85B performs surprisingly well as a computer monitor. It's practically perfect for office work – the fonts are sharp and very readable thanks to full chroma 4:4:4 support, so it's easy to type, browse the web, or work on spreadsheets. But the real "fun" starts with gaming. The TV easily handles refresh rates up to 144 Hz for PC, and it also supports popular image synchronization technologies like NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync. Because of this, we don't have to worry about screen tearing or micro-stutters – the gameplay is smooth and simply looks great.

Besides the previously mentioned option of operating at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor—the darkest ones have a distinct rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that extended work at the computer can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
77%
80%

Here you can see the biggest price we pay for the high quality of the VA matrix contrast. The W85B, like most TVs with this type of panel, does not perform well when viewing from a greater angle. Colors lose intensity and the image begins to fade as soon as we move away from the screen's axis. This is not a flaw of Panasonic itself, but rather a feature of VA technology – great contrast in exchange for weaker viewing angles. So if you plan to watch movies with a larger group and often sit "to the side," keep this in mind.

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA panels. This is a compromise we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good head-on, but any significant deviation quickly results in drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

4.2/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Panasonic W85: 263 cd/m2

The Panasonic W85B has a satin finish panel that handles glare reduction and color retention quite well, even in bright light coming from windows or lamps. There is no "mirror" effect here, so watching television in a typical living room during the day is comfortable. However, the problem arises when we encounter really bright rooms – the TV does not have high brightness, so it won't cut through very strong sunlight. It's simply a screen that performs best in controlled conditions.

C6KS performs really well as a TV viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits easily cuts through challenging lighting conditions. In addition, there is a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections. As a result, the television surprisingly holds up well during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
Fire OS 8.1.4.6 (RS8146/3057
Image processor
MT5896
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Panasonic W85 TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

Panasonic W85

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

6.8/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

SmartTV: FireTV

The W85B runs on the Fire TV system and it must be admitted – this is a significant step forward compared to Panasonic's previous proprietary solutions. Here we have support for AirPlay, screen mirroring, and even voice control through Alexa. It sounds modern and in practice it actually offers quite a few possibilities. The problem is that in Europe, Fire TV still looks a bit like a "guest with luggage." It works decently, but there are occasional micro-stutters, the interface doesn’t always respond as smoothly as we would like, and you may encounter awkward translations in the menu. It’s not yet on the level of the major players like Google TV or even Tizen, but it is still an improvement over what Panasonic had before. However, the worst part of it all is that the Fire TV app library is quite modest and that is its biggest drawback.

Classic TV Features

In terms of classic television functionalities, it's quite good – we have a classic remote control with a full numeric keypad, a clear EPG guide, and the ability to record programs from the built-in tuner to an external USB drive (e.g., a flash drive). A downside is the lack of options to schedule recordings in advance – you can record "here and now," but you can't set recordings for later.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It is an environment that offers a lot—ideal for those who prioritize a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and voice assistant features work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply convenient.

The support for traditional television is somewhat lacking. Users who expect extensive "TV" features may feel overlooked. Besides the efficiently working Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Apps

7.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
No
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

3.1/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The biggest problem with the built-in player on Fire TV is the lack of support for external subtitle files. If you have your own movie library and use text files, you simply won't be able to display them on this TV. The player itself handles basic video formats, but if someone wanted to fully utilize files from USB, they would likely end up installing an additional app from the store (e.g., VLC).

The system player really delivers and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hiccup occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g., HEIC) – here, TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, such as VLC. This way, you can quickly address the shortcomings of the factory player, allowing you to play practically any material, customizing the TV to your preferences.

Sound

5.8/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    87dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Here, the Panasonic W85B unfortunately has nothing to brag about. The speakers sound flat and rather "plastic," so cinematic experiences are definitely not to be had here. There is no depth, no clear bass – just basic sound that merely "exists." It's a shame because we thought the external subwoofer used here would actually make a difference. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The only advantage is that the television can play really loudly. This might appeal to older users who often need higher volume to comfortably watch programs or news. For everyday TV viewing, it’s enough, but if someone is thinking about movies and gaming – an additional soundbar or audio system is essentially a must.

TCL C6KS performs almost identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same set of speakers branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth remembering the proper perspective. This bass performs decently against other televisions, but a home theater setup or even a basic soundbar will still offer a much fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS is suitable for regular television watching, but if someone is keen on a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be a natural choice.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data