Panasonic W85 vs Samsung Q6F (IPS)

Direct comparison

Q6F

Available screen sizes: 55”65”

Available screen sizes: 55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Amazon FireTV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.1

5.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.5

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.8

    4.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.8

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    7.7

    6.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.2

    1.8

  • Utility functions

    6.8

    5.9

  • Apps

    7.6

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    5.8

Advantages

  • VA matrix with high native contrast

  • High refresh rate 120/144 Hz

  • Two HDMI 2.1 ports supporting ALLM, VRR, and Dolby Vision in games

  • Very low input lag

  • Quite good color gamut coverage thanks to the QLED filter

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Sturdy central base

  • Great compatibility with PC – full 4:4:4 chroma, readable fonts

  • Tizen System: Works quickly, doesn't lag and

  • Large application library (Netflix, YouTube, HBO, Disney)

  • IPS matrix provides good image quality even when you are not sitting directly in front

  • Great font readability – good as a large monitor for text work

  • Basic gaming features: VRR and ALLM

  • Very low input lag

  • Senior-friendly remote: Classic layout with numeric buttons

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness (below 270 nits) – no real HDR

  • HDR mode in games is poorly developed, with incorrect HGiG implementation

  • Weak media file player

  • The FireTV system in Europe is poorly developed: there are micro stutters and awkward translations, and many apps are missing

  • Average sound quality, lacking depth

  • Motion smoothing doesn't want to work

  • A brightness level of 250 nits is not enough to feel any difference in HDR mode

  • Low contrast of the IPS panel ruins movie nights

  • An average brightness level of 150 nits during the day means you can hardly see anything in a sunny room

  • Lack of optical output

  • Infrared remote control (requires aiming at the screen)

Our verdict

The Panasonic W85B is a TV that aims to prove that the Japanese brand can produce not only top-tier devices but also something more "for the people." And it really does look decent on paper: a VA panel with solid contrast, high refresh rates of 120/144 Hz, two full HDMI 2.1 ports, and low input lag. It sounds like a great setup for a gamer or someone just looking for an affordable TV with good fundamentals. However, the reality is a bit more complicated. The W85B performs well mainly with SDR content, especially after calibration, and will serve well for typical everyday use. But when we start expecting more from it—for example, counting on strong HDR performance or greater immersion in games with that mode activated—the TV quickly shows its limitations. Its brightness is low and the lack of local dimming becomes quite noticeable during evening viewing. Therefore, we view the W85B more as a "daily" TV—ideal for someone who watches terrestrial television, YouTube, or SDR streaming, and wants to connect a console or PC for 120/144 Hz (but without HDR). In that role, it performs very well. Is it a TV for everyone? Definitely not. But if we accept its limitations and approach it with reasonable expectations, the W85B can provide a lot of enjoyment for a relatively sensible price.

The Samsung Q6F is a television that is difficult to evaluate through the lens of typical QLED models. We must remember that we are dealing with a budget proposition aimed at a very specific audience. If you are looking for an inexpensive device with the logo of a well-known manufacturer that simply needs to work, display multimedia, and offer classic remote control operation with buttons – the Q6F might be an interesting option for you. It's a great choice for a senior or someone who needs a large screen "on the cheap" for daily television, where the IPS matrix and its good viewing angles really make a difference. However, we must be straightforward: the biggest drawback of this model is its very low brightness and poor black levels. These are two foundations on which image quality is built, and here they are simply very fragile. This is definitely not a television that we would recommend for watching HDR content – here, that format exists practically only in name. Although the Q6F has a QLED filter and belongs to the Quantum Dot family, utilizing the full potential of this technology is practically impossible, as the device is technically not suited for such content. We know that it tempts with its very low price and may appeal to many people with modest requirements. However, you should know that the label "QLED" suggesting a premium product is far from what Samsung has accustomed us to in recent years. It's a ticket to the world of Samsung, but in a very basic version.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

1.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

3,150:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,000:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The W85B is Panasonic's entry-level LCD, so one shouldn't expect miracles in this category, but... the VA panel really does a great job here. Its biggest advantage is simply better contrast than in popular IPS panels – blacks often look gray there, while here you can actually see deeper tones. In the scenes we tested, the contrast held around 4000:1, which translates to roughly four times better performance than in IPS panels. Of course, there's no local dimming, so in difficult conditions, when it gets really dark in the room, black can resemble navy more than absolute pitch black. This is the difference you can see compared to OLEDs or Mini-LEDs. But in everyday viewing – a series, a match, a movie in the evening in the living room – this contrast is more than sufficient. The image has the right depth, and the W85B doesn't give the feeling of a "washed-out" television.

Here it is clearly visible where the manufacturer decided to save money. The IPS panel used, despite the support of QLED technology, highlights problems with the lack of image depth. Results at the level of 1000:1 speak for themselves – the black in this model unfortunately resembles gray. You can try to save the situation by turning on the light in the room, and it's best to place it directly behind the television, which allows you to somewhat trick our eyes. However, regardless of what one might say, the contrast in the Q6F with the IPS panel is simply weak and this will be noticeable in dark scenes.

HDR effect quality

4.2/10

3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision
HDR10, HDR10+
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.6%, Bt.2020: 75.0%
DCI P3: 87.7%, Bt.2020: 65.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

249 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

283 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

282 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

93 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

256 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung Q6F (IPS)

Panasonic W85

Unfortunately, we don't have good news here. The Panasonic W85B is rather dim – its peak brightness does not exceed 300 nits, so it's hard to talk about any true HDR effect. In practice, this means that scenes which on other screens can "shine" and make an impression, here look simply like regular SDR with a slight boost in colors. Our measurements and film tests confirmed this – regardless of the content, the W85B won't extract anything more from HDR. So if someone is looking for a TV specifically for HDR, it's better to look towards other models. As a consolation, the fact remains that in terms of colors, the W85B performs quite well. It's a QLED TV, so its color gamut coverage is wide, and most films and series look natural, without a distinct "washed out" effect. The colors are saturated, so during regular viewing, there is no sense that something is quite wrong.

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q6F is a very dark model. Its peak brightness in HDR does not exceed 250 nits, which is definitely too low to even speak of any "high dynamic range" effect, or HDR. In practice, it's better to stick to content in SDR format, which simply looks more predictable on this TV. Another problem is the global dimming technique – in scenes with a lot of black, the TV drastically dims the entire panel to artificially improve the black levels. This causes the image to become even darker, and brightness can drop below 100 nits. The only consolation is the QLED technology, but even here it's average. The applied quantum dot layer is not top-notch, as the coverage of the DCI-P3 color gamut does not exceed 90%. As a result, colors in HDR content may just seem under-saturated.

Factory color reproduction

4.2/10

5.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

While testing the Panasonic W85B, we of course started with the Filmmaker mode, as it is the gold standard today for watching content "as the director intended." The problem is that this TV is quite far from those intentions. The biggest issue turned out to be an excess of red – in both SDR and HDR. The picture often looked overly warm, and in some scenes, it appeared almost "blazing." Additionally, there’s the issue of brightness management. When we looked at the gamma and EOTF charts, it was clear as day that in most scenes, the TV brightens the image more than it should. The effect was easy to predict. Details can get lost, leading to flattening and clipping across the entire screen. Of course, we know how to improve this, but it must be said honestly that it requires quite a bit of work in calibration. Out of the box, the W85B does not provide a reference-level picture – it is rather a TV that will always interpret colors and brightness a bit "its own way" without professional adjustments. Unfortunately, this is to the detriment of the viewer.

We tested the television in Filmmaker mode, which showed us two completely different faces of this model. Looking at SDR content, we were honestly shocked at how good this TV looks straight out of the box. It was really hard to nitpick anything here. Despite a slight “haze” in the white balance or somewhat brightened details in the blacks (which directly results from the IPS panel's design), color errors hovered around the “2” level. This is surprisingly good, even outstanding, considering the price of this device.

On the other hand, what the Q6F displayed in terms of colors after switching to HDR mode was a very unpleasant surprise. The errors in color reproduction and palette were so huge that our charts literally ran out of scale. Of course, since Samsung even in such an inexpensive model offers very advanced calibration possibilities, we decided to approach the subject professionally and check what could be done about it during calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

6.9/10

6.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Fortunately, calibration made a significant difference for the Panasonic W85B, especially in SDR content. Here, the improvement was really noticeable – we managed to balance the white and reasonably tame the TV's tendency to excessively brighten the entire image. The picture became more coherent, and the colors gained a naturalness that was lacking in the factory settings. Admittedly, the results from the Color Checker are not perfect, as the W85B has visible issues with green saturation, but overall, we assess the post-calibration effect in SDR very positively. The situation with HDR is a bit different. Here, we were also able to limit the tendency to warm up the entire scene, so the image turned out much better than in the factory settings. However, the same problem we mentioned earlier is still evident – the TV interprets the image too "in its own way" and brightens the entire frame. The lack of local dimming only exacerbates this effect. In summary, briefly in SDR content, the W85B performs really well after calibration and is perfectly suitable for everyday viewing. However, in HDR, even after adjustments, it is still hard to unequivocally recommend it for serious viewing sessions.

After our calibration, the colors in SDR mode looked even better – the result is quite surprising, as color errors at level "1" are something usually seen in devices costing several thousand dollars. In this regard, the Q6F is really a great screen for everyday television, less demanding series, or movies. Unfortunately, our interference in HDR mode did not bring about a noticeable improvement. The television, due to its poor black levels and low coverage of a wide color gamut, still has significant problems with proper color saturation, especially red. This is an example of a device where HDR mainly exists as a label on the box – for everyday use, we definitely recommend watching content in SDR format.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.1/10

9/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Here we can confidently praise the Panasonic W85B. The television handles color blending and tonal transitions really remarkably. Gradients look smooth, without visible bands or artificial outlines. As a result, the image gains a natural quality, and sequences with a lot of subtle shades – like the sky or blurred backgrounds – look exceptionally good for this class of equipment.

Samsung Q6F handles the phenomenon of posterization very well. In most scenes, the color transitions are smooth and there are no problematic "steppings" when blending colors. Only in very extreme moments, especially in scenes with brightness close to pure gray, can slight banding be noticed. Although, to be honest, we personally found the issue of slight clouding (uneven backlighting) and the poor contrast of the IPS panel to be much more bothersome than the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

With native SDR content, the Panasonic W85B performs very well – tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without artificial bands or clear contours. However, the situation looks worse with lower resolution materials. This is where the television has the biggest problem with "beautifying" the image. The lack of any option in the menu that would allow for improving gradation means that with older films or materials from YouTube, one can sometimes notice slight issues with color blending.

Fortunately, upscaling, or increasing the quality of lower resolution content, performs much better. This is definitely a strong point of this model – the image is scaled cleanly and in detail, and the television handles this better than one might expect from such an affordable device. This is thanks to the HCX processor, which Panasonic has been developing for years, and it shows that even in the lower series, it can do a good job.

The Q6F handles upscaling lower resolution content to native 4K very well. The scaling is surprisingly good here, even for such a budget TV from the QLED series. The only downside is when we watch very low-resolution material, like 576p (typical for old DVD players) – then the image may be slightly cropped. This is because the TV does not allow for the Overscan feature to be turned off, which is a common issue with Samsung devices.

The situation is completely different when it comes to digital processing, which is the attempt to smooth the image from unwanted artifacts. Here, the TV completely fails. Although we find a function in the menu called "Noise Reduction", it yields no visible results regardless of the slider setting. The only thing it seems to do is introduce unwanted errors into the image. Despite its presence in the system, we definitely do not recommend using it.

Blur and motion smoothness

6.5/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
77%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

At first glance, everything looks good – the Panasonic W85B has a 120 Hz panel and even a 144 Hz mode, so it seems that it should handle smooth motion well. The problem begins when we look into the settings. The options for improving fluidity are supposedly present in the menu, but in practice… they change nothing. No matter what we choose, the image looks the same. On top of that, there's a lack of BFI, which is the black frame insertion mode that helps sharpen motion in many TVs. And suddenly, it turns out that despite having a strong panel, the W85B doesn't give us any real tools to adjust that motion to our needs. It only works well when the source itself operates at a higher frequency – for example, games at 120 Hz. But when it comes to movies or sports, we just have to take what the TV shows us, because there's nothing more we can do about it.

The 60 Hz panel in the Samsung Q6F is the standard in this price range, which makes it a rather average model for dynamic sports or gaming. However, in the case of movies, the TV performs quite well thanks to the smoothing feature. The "Motion Smoothing" option allows you to adjust the fluidity of motion to your own preferences – from maintaining a cinematic feel to full fluidity.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.5/10

5.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

On paper, the Panasonic W85B looks really solid. Here we have two full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for ALLM, variable refresh rate, Dolby Vision in games, and of course, a high refresh rate for the panel itself. Additionally, there’s the characteristic Panasonic game bar that allows you to check key parameters with one click and quickly change them if necessary. Sounds great, but the problem arises when we activate HDR. Here, the W85B significantly falters because it lacks proper HGiG implementation – the TV manages brightness poorly, and instead of faithful image rendering, we get scenes that are too bright, sometimes even blown out. The solution? The simplest – turn off HDR in the console settings and leave everything in SDR. And here it gets really interesting, because in this scenario, the W85B shows its better side. Low input lag, high smoothness thanks to 120 Hz – all of this makes gaming look phenomenal. Yes, HDR can be sacrificed, but if responsiveness and smooth gameplay are priorities, the W85B provides a lot of fun.

We won’t beat around the bush – the Q6F is not a television designed with gamers in mind. While it does have features like ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode) and VRR frame synchronization for consoles, the list of benefits pretty much ends there. Besides these basics, the TV offers nothing more that might satisfy those who spend a lot of time in front of a console. It’s a real shame that such a useful tool as Game Bar is missing here, which in Samsung’s higher models allows for quick control of game parameters. In terms of gaming, this is an absolutely basic model and is only suitable for "casual" gamers.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
11 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
17 ms
11 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
11 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

There is really nothing to be afraid of here. The Panasonic W85B reacts instantly to our movements, and the values measured in tests can easily compete with gaming monitors. With a 120 Hz signal, the input lag is around 8–10 ms, and at 60 Hz it hovers around 17–20 ms. In practice, this means one thing – no delays, no frustration! You press the button, and the action happens right away on the screen.

As a consolation for the modest list of features for gamers, it's worth adding that the Q6F has absolutely no issues with input lag. The response to controller movements is instantaneous, and the television does not introduce any additional delays regardless of the resolution we are currently playing in. In this respect, the controls are very precise and comfortable, which is a significant advantage in this class of equipment.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The Panasonic W85B performs surprisingly well as a computer monitor. It's practically perfect for office work – the fonts are sharp and very readable thanks to full chroma 4:4:4 support, so it's easy to type, browse the web, or work on spreadsheets. But the real "fun" starts with gaming. The TV easily handles refresh rates up to 144 Hz for PC, and it also supports popular image synchronization technologies like NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync. Because of this, we don't have to worry about screen tearing or micro-stutters – the gameplay is smooth and simply looks great.

Although the Q6F is not a screen specifically designed for PC gaming, it deserves praise for how it handles displaying fonts. As a monitor for text work, browsing websites, or daily news reading, the television performs exceptionally well. The readability of text is at a very high level, thanks to the proper implementation of the Chroma 4:4:4 signal and the use of an IPS panel. If you are looking for a budget-friendly, large screen for office work, the Q6F holds up quite well in this regard. Especially since Samsung offers very good integration with the Windows system and built-in Microsoft Office tools.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

5.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
77%
78%

Here you can see the biggest price we pay for the high quality of the VA matrix contrast. The W85B, like most TVs with this type of panel, does not perform well when viewing from a greater angle. Colors lose intensity and the image begins to fade as soon as we move away from the screen's axis. This is not a flaw of Panasonic itself, but rather a feature of VA technology – great contrast in exchange for weaker viewing angles. So if you plan to watch movies with a larger group and often sit "to the side," keep this in mind.

Viewing angles are one of the better aspects of the Q6F model, which is directly attributed to the use of an IPS panel. They are much better than those found in televisions based on VA panels. As a result, the image viewed at an angle remains clear and does not become "washed out" or faded. However, it is worth noting that although the colors look really good, the brightness drop at a larger angle is quite noticeable. Nevertheless, this is a solid performance for those who do not always sit directly in front of the screen.

Daytime performance

4.2/10

1.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung Q6F (IPS): 125 cd/m2

Panasonic W85: 263 cd/m2

The Panasonic W85B has a satin finish panel that handles glare reduction and color retention quite well, even in bright light coming from windows or lamps. There is no "mirror" effect here, so watching television in a typical living room during the day is comfortable. However, the problem arises when we encounter really bright rooms – the TV does not have high brightness, so it won't cut through very strong sunlight. It's simply a screen that performs best in controlled conditions.

There’s not much to say – aside from the satin coating of the panel, which dampens reflections only moderately, the Q6F is such a dark device that it’s not suitable even for moderately lit rooms. A brightness level of around 150 nits is simply astronomically low by today’s standards. With such a result, any larger light source in the room will make the picture hard to read. This is definitely not a model for a sunlit living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
QLED
Software version during testing
Fire OS 8.1.4.6 (RS8146/3057
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1110.7
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Panasonic W85 TV Panel details
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV Panel details

Panasonic W85

Samsung Q6F (IPS)

TV features

6.8/10

5.9/10

  • HDMI inputs
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features

SmartTV: FireTV

The W85B runs on the Fire TV system and it must be admitted – this is a significant step forward compared to Panasonic's previous proprietary solutions. Here we have support for AirPlay, screen mirroring, and even voice control through Alexa. It sounds modern and in practice it actually offers quite a few possibilities. The problem is that in Europe, Fire TV still looks a bit like a "guest with luggage." It works decently, but there are occasional micro-stutters, the interface doesn’t always respond as smoothly as we would like, and you may encounter awkward translations in the menu. It’s not yet on the level of the major players like Google TV or even Tizen, but it is still an improvement over what Panasonic had before. However, the worst part of it all is that the Fire TV app library is quite modest and that is its biggest drawback.

Classic TV Features

In terms of classic television functionalities, it's quite good – we have a classic remote control with a full numeric keypad, a clear EPG guide, and the ability to record programs from the built-in tuner to an external USB drive (e.g., a flash drive). A downside is the lack of options to schedule recordings in advance – you can record "here and now," but you can't set recordings for later.

It's really cool that in Samsung TVs – even the most budget-friendly ones – the Tizen system just "doesn't slow down." The speed of operation, while not on par with the most expensive models, is definitely better than in the case of Google TV at a similar price. Thanks to Tizen, we have access to a truly vast library of applications, AirPlay, and other Smart TV features.

It's worth mentioning that the remote that comes with the Q6F is an older, yet somewhat modernized version of the classic Samsung infrared controller, equipped with a full numeric keypad. Even though it operates on infrared, it has a lot of buttons, which may appeal to older users watching traditional television – it simply makes channel switching easier. We will also find a clear EPG interface, teletext, and support for Bluetooth headphones. It sounds a bit like a senior's dream come true, and there really is something to it.

However, we must note a serious lack in terms of connections: this model does not have an optical output for audio devices. Only the HDMI eARC port is available, which can be quite a hindrance if we have an external audio system.

Apps

7.6/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
No
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

3.1/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The biggest problem with the built-in player on Fire TV is the lack of support for external subtitle files. If you have your own movie library and use text files, you simply won't be able to display them on this TV. The player itself handles basic video formats, but if someone wanted to fully utilize files from USB, they would likely end up installing an additional app from the store (e.g., VLC).

When it comes to multimedia support from external sources, the Samsung Q6F performs exceptionally well, especially considering that we are dealing with a closed system. The television has no issues with most popular video, audio, or image formats (EVEN HEIC!). The media player operates stably and quickly loads content from USB drives or network servers. It is a solid device for browsing your own movie archives or home photo galleries.

Sound

5.8/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    87dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Here, the Panasonic W85B unfortunately has nothing to brag about. The speakers sound flat and rather "plastic," so cinematic experiences are definitely not to be had here. There is no depth, no clear bass – just basic sound that merely "exists." It's a shame because we thought the external subwoofer used here would actually make a difference. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The only advantage is that the television can play really loudly. This might appeal to older users who often need higher volume to comfortably watch programs or news. For everyday TV viewing, it’s enough, but if someone is thinking about movies and gaming – an additional soundbar or audio system is essentially a must.

When it comes to sound, the Samsung Q6F plays... well, flat. At the same time, however, the sound is clear and loud enough that it is perfectly suitable for listening to the news or regular television. The voices of the narrators are understandable and don’t fade into the background. However, if someone cares about at least decent experiences while watching movies, we definitely recommend purchasing a soundbar. Even the cheapest model from the Korean manufacturer's offering will make a huge difference here and save the situation.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

0dBC (Max)

75dBC