The Panasonic W70A primarily draws attention with its extensive Google TV operating system, which gives us access to a myriad of popular applications (YouTube, Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, etc.). When it comes to the picture, the IPS matrix offers wide viewing angles, so colors do not lose intensity even when you watch a movie slightly off to the side. Gamers won't be disappointed either; we have VRR and ALLM here, as well as low input lag (around 12 ms) – all of this translates to a pleasant experience for occasional gaming, despite the standard 60 Hz refresh rate.
However, it is worth remembering that this is rather a basic model and has its limitations. The contrast and black levels are simply poor, which is a typical phenomenon for IPS matrices, especially in dark rooms. Brightness at around 270 cd/m² is also insufficient in heavily sunlit rooms, so the picture may seem washed out then. Additionally, certain shortcomings in the software cannot be overlooked. Google TV is a great foundation, but some settings are scattered in surprising places, and the quality of translations leaves much to be desired.
One must consider that the competition is offering more and more in a similar (or only slightly higher) price range. Can the Panasonic W70A hold its ground in such an environment? On one hand, it tempts with a rich application base and decent support for gamers, but on the other hand, the market is flooded with more polished TVs equipped with better parameters. However, if wide viewing angles and straightforward access to Google TV services are priorities, we can give it a chance. Otherwise, it is worth exploring competitive models that often offer better black levels, higher brightness, and fewer annoying menu issues for a similar price.
The Samsung S90F is an excellent representative of the premium mid-range in the world of OLED televisions. Here we have an organic matrix that guarantees perfect contrast – and no matter how hard LCD manufacturers try with local dimming in Mini LEDs, this black simply cannot be replicated. The S90F displays its class here without any compromises. Compared to last year's model, we get a slightly brighter WOLED panel that can achieve up to 1200 nits in favorable conditions. This is a result sufficient for comfortable viewing of HDR content in most scenes at reference quality – especially on streaming platforms like Netflix. The picture quality is at a very high level, regardless of whether we are watching a movie, playing on a console, or streaming a sports event. In fact – versatility is one of the greatest advantages of this model. With a 144 Hz refresh rate, very low input lag, and a full set of gaming features (including functioning HGiG and the unique Game Motion Plus motion smoother), it's hard to find anything to complain about. The Tizen system worked really well on the S90F. It has its limitations – primarily a closed ecosystem and fewer app options than Google TV – but if you mainly use the most popular services, this shouldn't be a problem. A big plus is also the remote control, which can operate most connected devices – even without a numeric keypad. There are also downsides. The built-in media player has issues with some formats, and the anti-reflective coating typical for WOLEDs doesn't cope very well with strong light – reflections can be noticeable. We also don't have support for DTS and Dolby Vision, but that's a standard at Samsung that has been to be expected for years. So is the S90F with a WOLED panel the perfect television? No – but it really is just a few things short. It's one of the most refined and complete OLEDs in this price range, capable of handling any content, from a series on Netflix to gaming on a console, to a Sunday match.