LG QNED93A / QNED90A vs LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

Direct comparison

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

C6 / C64 / C6E / C6H / C61

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

8.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    8.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.9

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    8.6

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.2

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    8.2

    8.4

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.9

    7.0

Advantages

  • Quite good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (about 1400 nits)

  • Wide color gamut coverage (about 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and a full set of gaming features (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and readable fonts

  • WebOS with a rich selection of apps and voice control

  • Magic Remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - great for older content like antenna TV or YouTube

  • Perfect black levels and OLED contrast

  • Very high HDR brightness, up to about 1,500 nits

  • Excellent picture quality for HDR movies and Dolby Vision

  • Very good image processing and upscaling

  • 165 Hz panel and virtually no motion blur

  • Great gaming package: VRR, G-Sync, HGiG, Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Very low input lag, about 5 ms at 120 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Intuitive and modern WebOS system

  • Convenient control using the Magic Remote with a gyroscope

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms need refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not bring a noticeable improvement over HDR10

  • Different remote versions depending on the C6 model; before buying, it's hard to know which Magic Remote will be included

  • Visible graininess (dithering) in dark areas; noticeable when viewed up close

  • Average reflection handling; in a very bright living room strong reflections may be visible

  • No DTS:X support; you'll need an external AV receiver or player for that format

Our verdict

LG QNED93A is a television that, at first glance, appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get a lot: a significantly larger number of dimming zones, a 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which still ranks among the most user-friendly operating systems. The QNED93A shines the most in gaming applications. Four fully functional HDMI 2.1 ports allow you to connect consoles and computers without any limitations, and the low input lag is maintained at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC gamers, an additional advantage is the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. So, it can be confidently said that in terms of gaming features, the QNED93A does not have any complexes compared to the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has long been regarded as one of the most convenient for everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows you to control the television like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness can also be considered a plus. At its peak, it manages to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is enough to ensure the picture doesn't fade in brighter rooms and that special effects in movies or games look convincing. The image processor does a good job of upscaling older content – television or films in lower resolutions appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be denied that the biggest problem with the QNED93A is the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of black, the screen can darken significantly, causing many details to simply disappear. The effect is such that contrast looks better at first glance but comes at the expense of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which typically enhances certain aspects of screens, but in this case, changes very little. The differences between dynamic and static metadata must literally be searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware, with its number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting, has the foundation for a better effect. So who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that works brilliantly as a home entertainment center, especially if you're thinking about gaming on a console or PC. In everyday television viewing and movie watching in well-lit conditions, it also provides a lot of satisfaction thanks to its high brightness and solid image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and when fully utilizing HDR, this model does not match its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been polished as it has in their OLED televisions.

The LG C6 is a very successful evolution of one of the most popular OLEDs on the market. The TV itself hasn't changed dramatically compared with last year's C5; the look is very similar, webOS offers comparable features, and gamers again get pretty much everything you'd expect from a modern TV. It's hard to fault that, since the C5 was already a very complete device in that regard. The most important change took place where there was actually room for improvement: the panel itself. The new WOLED panel is noticeably brighter, and roughly 1500 nits in HDR makes it increasingly hard to treat the C6 as just a "mid-range OLED." HDR movies look very impressive, black stays perfect, colors are very good, and the new processor (the same one found in the flagship G6) handles upscaling and lower-quality content very well. Add to that a seriously strong set of features for gamers. 165 Hz from a PC, VRR, G-Sync and very low input lag mean you can just as well hook up a console as a powerful PC. During the day the C6 also performs better than previous generations, though of course in a very bright living room you'll still find brighter TVs on the market. And that's probably exactly why we like the C series most: its versatility. The C6 doesn't try to be the best TV in every possible category, but it hardly performs poorly in any of them. It's suitable for movies, sports, gaming, regular TV and everyday streaming. If its price starts to fall after launch as it did with previous generations, it could be one of the most interesting OLEDs to buy in 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Contrast:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

We took a close look at the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, equipped with a high-contrast VA panel. However, in the case of Mini-LED TVs, it's not just the panel itself, but primarily the number and operation of local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted as many as 308 zones, which already looks impressive from the start. For comparison – last year's QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only around 160. The difference is enormous and shows that LG has made a significant step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but practice quickly dampens the enthusiasm. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed impress – bright elements are clearly separated from black, and in many scenes, the depth effect truly pleases the eye. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in backlight construction, the results are not much better than in last year's model. The algorithms controlling dimming can be too aggressive. This is especially noticeable in darker sequences, where the screen dims to such an extent that subtle details disappear from view. Many viewers will appreciate the stronger black, but it is hard to ignore that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic are scenes with many small, bright elements. It is during these moments that typical halo effects, or glowing outlines, associated with LCDs featuring local dimming zones appear around them. This phenomenon does not completely ruin the experience, but it serves as a reminder that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we have the impression that the manufacturer did not pay enough attention to optimizing the new model when it comes to black and contrast.

If we talk about black levels, there isn't much to discuss. The LG C6 uses an OLED panel, so each pixel can be completely turned off. The result is exactly what we'd expect: perfect black, very high contrast, and no halo or glow around bright elements. You can see this clearly in night scenes, where single lamps, text, or other bright points appear against a very dark background. The C6 handles them without any problems and doesn't have the limitations typical of Mini LED TVs with local dimming. Interestingly, in this respect it doesn't matter whether we're talking about this version of the C6 or the more expensive variant with a Tandem OLED panel. In terms of black alone, both TVs perform practically identically. Differences between them need to be sought mainly in brightness and color.

NOTE: In the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2 we noticed graininess and flickering in the darkest parts of the image. It looks like a software bug that LG should fix with an update. In the Tandem OLED version the effect is even more visible, and we observed similar behavior in the flagship LG G6 as well.

HDR effect quality

5.8/10

7.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%
DCI P3: 99.5%, Bt.2020: 75.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1489 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1288 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1527 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1345 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

649 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Luminance of RGB colors

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A did not directly translate to a noticeably better contrast, one cannot deny that this model is brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real movie scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with white or bright lights, the screen was able to maintain high luminance, which produced a truly decent incredible HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the television could show its true class, namely in scenes that require precision, all the magic evaporates. The dimming algorithms we mentioned earlier are aggressive enough that small bright objects—such as distant lights, stars, or the moon—can almost completely disappear. Just look at the test scenes from the movie Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) to see how subtle details are dimmed to the brink of visibility. It's a shame, because a greater number of zones could theoretically lead to significantly better results. Fortunately, there are also stronger points. The QNED93A performs well in terms of color gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colors in movies look vivid and full, and the picture does not lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. So it can be said that the HDR in this model is solid, although the unfinished local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

The HDR effect on the LG C6 is really very good. LG Display's new WOLED panel primarily brought a significant increase in brightness. In our unit we measured around 1,500 nits and, importantly, the TV can show similar values in many normal movie scenes. That gives HDR the proper impact. Bright highlights, lamps, or sunlight can be really strong, and most HDR movies simply look very impressive. Of course it's still an OLED, so brightness drops in scenes with a lot of white. The fifth scene of The Meg illustrates this well, where the C6 reached about 600-700 nits. That's still a very good result, but it also shows the new panel hasn't removed all the limitations typical of OLEDs.

Colors

When it comes to color, there is also little to complain about. The C6 covers about 99% of the DCI-P3 gamut and roughly 75% of BT.2020. In practice the colors are very saturated and, importantly, stable regardless of the scene. That's worth emphasizing, because not every TV behaves the same in this respect. In some RGB Mini LED models color saturation can depend more strongly on image brightness. Today a wider color gamut is mainly offered by QD-OLED TVs and new SQD models with a new generation of quantum dots. However, the C6 still performs very strongly here and is able to generate appropriately saturated colors in most movie scenes.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In movie mode (specifically Filmmaker), color reproduction on the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although it wasn't without critiques. In SDR content, white balance leaned towards warmer tones, resulting in a slight yellowing across the entire screen. Gamma, on the other hand, led to a slight brightening of the image, making it look a bit less natural, especially in scenes requiring precise shading (this is evident in the comparison picture). This isn't a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the picture deviates from the aesthetic intended by the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation looked somewhat different. The white balance presented itself quite well here, ensuring that whites didn't lean towards pink or unwanted shades of green. However, brightness management proved to be an issue. Analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments the television can be noticeably too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some detail and reducing the realism of scenes. This detracted from the experience of HDR effects, which were theoretically supposed to be the most impressive. For this reason, we decided to carry out calibration.

Right out of the box the LG C6 is pretty well set up, especially if you choose Filmmaker mode. In SDR material the white balance is decent, although as brightness increases it starts to lack a bit of red. The picture becomes a little cooler as a result, but it’s not such a big difference that it stands out during normal viewing. More happens in the brightness response itself. Gamma is a bit low and instead of holding at 2.4 it sits closer to 2.1–2.2 over much of the range. In practice the C6 slightly brightens midtones. Shadows are therefore more readable, but the image loses some depth compared with how it should look in a dark room. In HDR the situation is a bit more interesting. The start of the grayscale looks very good, but from about 20–30% brightness the white balance starts to drift more and more. As brightness rises there’s more red and a noticeable lack of blue. In the brightest highlights the difference is already significant and also affects reproduction of some colors. The EOTF curve itself is handled fairly well over most of the range. The C6 only has a tendency to slightly brighten the image, which we also saw during our film comparisons. The largest deviation appears around the brightest highlights, where the TV begins to adapt the signal to the panel’s capabilities. So the out-of-the-box Filmmaker mode in HDR isn’t perfect, but overall it performs well. The biggest room for improvement is the white balance, especially at high brightness.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode on the QNED93A gained the most where it matters most in everyday use. It was possible to adjust the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality films. This makes colors look natural and pleasant, and the overall experience is much more comfortable. In HDR mode, we also made adjustments, but the biggest problem here turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG provides some leeway in the settings, the television still manages brightness on its own terms. It is evident that the local dimming algorithms are not entirely refined and can spoil the viewing experience by dimming parts of the image at inappropriate moments. Nonetheless, it is worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for daily viewing.

LG TVs have been very receptive to calibration for years, and the C6 is no exception. After adjustment the white balance was set almost perfectly, and most color errors dropped to values below 3, often even around 2. In practice this means very accurate color reproduction in both SDR and HDR. An interesting detail appeared only with the HDR brightness characteristic. On a classic EOTF chart everything looks nearly ideal, and at first glance it would be hard to find fault. Only when we measured the TV’s behavior using filters based on actual movie scenes did it become clear that the C6 has a slight tendency to artificially boost image brightness.

It’s not a huge difference and many people may even see it as a positive, because HDR looks a bit more impressive this way. From the standpoint of fidelity to the source material this isn’t ideal — some scenes are simply a touch brighter than the filmmaker intended. Interestingly, this is somewhat unusual for LG. In previous generations, the brand’s TVs typically stuck very closely to the reference tone curve after calibration. With the C6 we’re still very close to the standard, but that subtle boost in brightness is indeed noticeable in films and series.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is really good. In most scenes, there are no artificial color divisions or banding effects. Dark shots are particularly surprising – this is where many TVs struggle, but here the image remains smooth and cohesive. In brighter sections, subtle color transitions can be observed, but they are not pronounced enough to draw significant attention. During testing, we encountered a clear issue with the DSE effect, also known as the "dirty screen" effect. On our unit, the phenomenon was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners noticeably darkened, giving the image a vignetted appearance. This could be a flaw of the test unit, but during intense viewing, it was hard to ignore.

The LG C6 handles tonal transitions very well. In most movie scenes it was hard to notice any obvious posterization issues. Both in the dark parts of the image and in bright gradients the colors remain relatively smooth and do not break up into visible bands. That's good news, because WOLED panels haven't always been perfect in this regard. With the C6 it's clearly better, and during normal viewing this aspect of the image shouldn't draw attention.

Note: One downside is the dithering visible in near-black areas. Up close you can notice subtle flicker and grain in the darkest parts of the image. It's not as pronounced as with the Tandem OLED panel, but it still occurs, so we decided to dock the C6 a few points in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

8.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

LG QNED93A proves to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor handles scaling excellently, ensuring that even older movies or terrestrial television gain sharpness and detail. During the screening of "The Godfather," it's clearly visible how upscaling pulls extra details from the image – the characters' faces and the texture of the clothing appear much clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function for reducing unwanted color banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the "Medium" setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without over-interfering with the image. This way, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen doesn't appear unnaturally smoothed. Perhaps in some scenes, you can still notice slight color banding, but in practice, the effect is more favorable than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

The LG C6 has taken a really big step forward here. The TV uses the same processor found in the flagship G6, and in terms of image processing the two models are very similar. That’s a big plus, because in this area LG’s processor this year performs excellently. The "Smooth Gradation" feature works especially well. With heavily compressed material it can effectively hide ugly tonal transitions and artifacts that often appear, for example, in lower-quality streaming. It’s best to leave it set to "Low." Then the improvement is clear, and the TV doesn’t yet start blurring fine details. Higher levels smooth the image more, but can already remove some of the natural texture of objects on the screen. The upscaling itself also performs very well. Lower-resolution content is sharpened properly, edges look clean, and the processor quite effectively rebuilds fine details. In this regard the C6 is already very close to LG’s best TVs, and the differences compared with the G6 are small.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.6/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
-
Brightness drop with BFI
56%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz):

LG QNED93A is equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly making their way into televisions can be seen as a positive development. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this regard, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the image through the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion character with visible frames and a fully smoothed theatrical motion.

The LG C6 features a panel with a maximum refresh rate of 165 Hz, which is great news especially for gamers using a powerful PC. For movies, sports, or consoles we'll of course use up to 120 Hz, but even then it's hard to fault the motion clarity. As you'd expect from an OLED, the panel's response time is almost instantaneous. Moving objects therefore don't leave the characteristic smears you still see on LCD TVs. This is particularly noticeable in sports and fast-paced games, where the picture remains very clean even during dynamic motion.

For movies and TV, LG also provides the TruMotion motion-smoothing system. In the user settings you'll find two separate sliders. De-Judder is mainly for low-frame-rate content, that is primarily 24 fps films and series. It can slightly reduce the characteristic judder, or be set higher if you want a much smoother image. De-Blur is useful for higher-frame-rate material, mainly sports broadcasts and 50/60 fps television.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

10/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    40 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been designed with gamers in mind. Right from the start, we get a complete package – all four HDMI ports operate at standard 2.1, so whether we connect a console, PC, or receiver, we can be sure of full compatibility. This is important because many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing prevents all equipment from having maximum capabilities. There’s also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console starts up, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This ensures that the image does not stutter or tear, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is sufficient for consoles, in the case of PCs, the QNED93A allows for even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, which makes a difference especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in games – the television supports the HGiG mode, which provides guidelines to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as intended by the game developers. For dessert, we get Game Bar – a special informational strip invoked on the screen that shows parameters in real-time. You can check the frame rate, active VRR functions, or input lag levels. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts, but for anyone who wants to quickly verify what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

LG has focused heavily on gamers for years, and the C6 really lacks nothing important. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz from consoles, and when connected to a PC it can run up to 165 Hz. It also offers VRR from 40 to 165 Hz, ALLM, and properly working HGiG. A big plus is Dolby Vision support for games, so the Xbox Series X can use that format without sacrificing game mode. The package is rounded out by a Game Bar that lets you quickly check key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. In terms of features, the C6 is one of those TVs that’s really hard to find fault with. Whether you play on PlayStation, Xbox, or PC, practically everything you could expect from a modern gaming TV is available here.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
14 ms
1080p120
7 ms
5 ms
2160p60
16 ms
14 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
15 ms
14 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
22 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms
14 ms

In the latency field, the LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of. The TV responds instantly to our actions, which is evident from the first tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, meaning nearly instant response – shots, passes, and precise movements of the stick immediately translate to the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result slightly increases to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the full comfort zone. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for games, which works with the Xbox Series X on the QNED93A. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a deterioration, but in practice, it’s still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

In terms of input lag, the C6 performs as a good gaming TV should. At 120 Hz we measured about 5 ms, so controller input is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz it rises to around 14 ms, which is still good. Slightly higher input lag appears in Dolby Vision. At 120 Hz we get about 14 ms, and at 60 Hz about 22 ms. In practice, if you're playing normally on an Xbox, it's unlikely to be something that will really bother you.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWBG
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

A new feature in this year's model is full support for 144 Hz refresh rate, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, and with AMD products, where it supports FreeSync Premium Pro. This ensures smooth gameplay without screen tearing or stuttering, and the panel itself performs very well in dynamic esports titles and demanding AAA productions.

Equally important is the clarity of the image in everyday work. The television supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and applications are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a small detail - with a dark background and bright letters, subtle horizontal lines may appear due to the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the comfort of using the television on a daily basis, but perfectionists may notice it after spending more time with text. But we don't think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen with text sitting less than 1 meter away from it 😉.

The C6 also performs very well when connected to a computer. The TV correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so text, icons and other small UI elements are displayed sharply. That means you can use it not only for gaming but also for regular work in Windows without major issues. One limitation is the four-subpixel matrix layout. If you sit very close to the screen, you may notice slight colored fringing along the edges of some fonts. However, this is not particularly bothersome and is practically invisible from a normal viewing distance. The C6 also has a lot to offer PC gamers. From a PC you can take full advantage of the 165 Hz refresh rate, plus there’s G-Sync, VRR and a very low input lag of around 5 ms at maximum refresh. Combined with the OLED’s ultra-fast response time, this delivers a very smooth, clean image with no visible smearing. So if someone plans to hook a powerful PC to the C6, the TV can easily serve as a large gaming monitor and also works quite well for everyday productivity.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

7.4/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
33%

QNED93A uses a VA matrix, and that means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at an angle of about 45 degrees, brightness drops by as much as 80%, and colors begin to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast that VA panels offer. There is no additional coating to improve angles, as found in some more expensive models, so the QNED93A looks best when viewed directly. If you are planning a large family viewing, where some viewers will sit more to the side, you should expect that the image will not be as attractive as it is at the center of the screen.

Viewing angles on the LG C6 are very good and are actually among the best you can find in TVs today. That’s largely thanks to the OLED panel itself. Even when you sit noticeably to the side, the picture still maintains good contrast and the colors don’t lose much of their saturation. Because of that, the C6 is very well suited to a larger living room where not everyone sits directly in front of the screen. Only at very extreme angles can you notice slight changes in color, but during normal viewing it’s hard to regard that as any kind of problem. In this respect, really only Samsung Display's QD-OLED panels perform better.

Daytime performance

6.2/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

LG OLED C6 (WOLED): 469 cd/m2

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix that handles reflections moderately well. It is certainly not at the level of matte screens, but it doesn't have the mirror-like effect seen in models with a glossy surface. As a result, reflections are not too bothersome, and colors maintain their intensity even when light from the window hits the screen. Brightness is also a plus. The average level in HDR mode stays within 550-600 nits. This means that the television performs well in well-lit rooms, and you can enjoy a viewing experience even during the day when the blinds are only partially closed. In the role of a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A really performs well.

The LG C6 has a glossy panel that handles direct reflections quite well, but it doesn't eliminate them completely. If there's a large window or a bright lamp opposite the TV, their reflections will still be visible. On the other hand, the screen preserves blacks well in a lit room, and even during the day the picture doesn't become gray or washed out. Additionally, the C6 is fairly bright in SDR. With typical content we measured about 470 nits, so in most living rooms it should handle daytime viewing without major issues. Brightness only starts to drop significantly when a large portion of the screen is occupied by white. This is still one of the typical characteristics of OLEDs, and you can notice it with very bright content, such as winter sports. Overall the C6 performs well in a normally lit living room. However, if the TV will sit opposite huge windows and have to battle strong sunlight for most of the day, a bright Mini LED will still be the better choice.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
43.11.77
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV Panel details

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

TV features

8.2/10

8.4/10

  • System
    WebOS
    WebOS
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features

QNED93A operates under webOS, one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It includes AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is reasonably clear and mostly fast, although in the tested unit, there were instances where the response to pressing the remote required a moment of "thought." However, it is hard to consider this a serious issue – webOS remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates to improve it even more.

Classic Features

In this model, LG did not include the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the TV itself performs excellently as a screen for everyday viewing of antenna channels. The EPG interface is clear, the TV offers a television guide, and we have the ability to record programs from the built-in tuners directly onto a USB drive. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We only missed the PiP function, which in 2025 is offered by just two manufacturers.

Magic Remote

The Magic remote is still the biggest difference compared to the competition. In 2025, it underwent a slight facelift – it has fewer buttons and resembles the minimalist remotes from Samsung a bit. However, the cursor remained key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It’s incredibly simple yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is much faster, and it’s hard to switch back to classic buttons afterwards.

Smart TV - webOS

Regardless of which C6 variant you end up with, the feature set is the same. At the heart of the TV is, of course, webOS, the system LG has been developing for many years. It runs fast, is well optimized and, above all, provides access to practically all popular apps. Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, YouTube, Max and other streaming services - in that respect there are few gaps. The system itself also offers plenty of extra features. There’s AirPlay, easy screen mirroring from your smartphone, control of smart home devices and the ability to personalize the home screen. LG has been expanding webOS for several generations and sometimes the number of tabs and recommendations can be a bit overwhelming, especially with background ads, but once you get used to it the system is convenient and, most importantly, works smoothly.

Classic TV features

The C6 also handles being used like a regular TV very well, not just as a screen for Netflix. Over-the-air TV reception, the program guide and channel switching all work smoothly and there’s little to complain about. LG still offers the ability to record shows to USB, so in terms of classic features the set is really well equipped. There are basically only two things missing. The first is PiP, the ability to display two video sources at once. The second is a backlight on the remote, which would be useful for evening viewing. Other than that the C6 has pretty much everything you can expect from a modern TV.

Magic Remote - DIFFERENT VERSIONS

When buying the C6 it’s worth paying attention to the remote, because LG has created a bit of a mix-up here. During our tests we had, among others, the C64 variant, found in large retail chains. That package included the new, much smaller Magic Remote Slim. It has fewer buttons and looks far more modern, but it still keeps two of LG’s most distinctive remote features - the scroll wheel and pointer control by moving the remote. The C6E we tested came with the older, larger Magic Remote. It works essentially the same, but has a classic numeric keypad and many more physical buttons. It looks less modern, but some people, especially those used to classic remotes, may find it more comfortable. So there’s no single answer to which remote is better. The new one is smaller, simpler and decidedly more contemporary, while the older one gives faster access to more functions without navigating through menus. It’s good to know that depending on the C6 model code the box may contain one or the other variant.

Apps

9.1/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.8/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats without any issues, so it’s perfectly sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor hiccups. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which is Apple’s photo format. The manufacturer claims that the television should open them, but in practice, we were unable to confirm that. The second issue involved text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, other, more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it's hard to consider this a real limitation in everyday use.

During our tests the TV handled practically all of the most popular video formats we put on a USB flash drive without any problems. There were no issues with high bitrates, subtitles, or more demanding files, so it's hard to find fault with it in that respect. The only exception was material with a DTS audio track. This is not surprising, since the TV simply does not support that codec. Besides, the TV’s media player is good enough that most users will be fine without installing third-party apps or hooking up an external player.

Sound

6.9/10

7/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for the built-in speakers in the television. The sound is fairly clear, and at moderate volume levels, vocals and dialogues come across distinctly. The bass, as is usually the case in relatively slim constructions, is not the strongest, but its presence can be felt and is completely sufficient for everyday viewing of series. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and does not lead to strong distortions, although in more demanding cinematic scenes, it's noticeable that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as acceptable and not off-putting. It definitely won't compete with a soundbar, but it also won't ruin your movie experience.

In terms of sound, the C6 has hardly changed compared with last year’s C5. We still get a 2.2 system with a total output of 40 W, which is a somewhat more solid foundation than the simple 2.0 20 W setups in many TVs. In practice the sound is quite good. Dialogues are clear, the sound isn’t overly flat, and the extra speakers provide a bit more bass than many basic TVs. Of course it still won’t replace a good soundbar, let alone a full home theater, but it’s more than enough for everyday TV viewing.

There is a small step back in the settings, though. LG removed some of the preset sound modes this year, which makes it a bit harder to tailor the sound to your preferences than with the previous generation. For that reason our rating is slightly lower, even though the speakers’ capabilities remain virtually unchanged. On the plus side, the TV supports Dolby Atmos, currently the most popular surround format for films and streaming. It still lacks DTS support, which may matter mainly to people using their own movie libraries on discs or files.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy