LG QNED93A / QNED90A vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.9

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.2

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    8.2

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.9

    6.2

Advantages

  • Quite good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (about 1400 nits)

  • Wide color gamut coverage (about 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and a full set of gaming features (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and readable fonts

  • WebOS with a rich selection of apps and voice control

  • Magic Remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - great for older content like antenna TV or YouTube

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS panel)

  • Very low input lag (around 10-12 ms)

  • Smooth webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with cursor

  • Better color gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp text, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colors after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient scaling of older content

  • Noticeable bass in the sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms need refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not bring a noticeable improvement over HDR10

  • Poor black and low contrast

  • Low brightness (about 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Panel refresh rate only 60 Hz

  • USB player without support for HEIC files and very large photos (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

LG QNED93A is a television that, at first glance, appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get a lot: a significantly larger number of dimming zones, a 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which still ranks among the most user-friendly operating systems. The QNED93A shines the most in gaming applications. Four fully functional HDMI 2.1 ports allow you to connect consoles and computers without any limitations, and the low input lag is maintained at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC gamers, an additional advantage is the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. So, it can be confidently said that in terms of gaming features, the QNED93A does not have any complexes compared to the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has long been regarded as one of the most convenient for everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows you to control the television like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness can also be considered a plus. At its peak, it manages to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is enough to ensure the picture doesn't fade in brighter rooms and that special effects in movies or games look convincing. The image processor does a good job of upscaling older content – television or films in lower resolutions appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be denied that the biggest problem with the QNED93A is the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of black, the screen can darken significantly, causing many details to simply disappear. The effect is such that contrast looks better at first glance but comes at the expense of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which typically enhances certain aspects of screens, but in this case, changes very little. The differences between dynamic and static metadata must literally be searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware, with its number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting, has the foundation for a better effect. So who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that works brilliantly as a home entertainment center, especially if you're thinking about gaming on a console or PC. In everyday television viewing and movie watching in well-lit conditions, it also provides a lot of satisfaction thanks to its high brightness and solid image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and when fully utilizing HDR, this model does not match its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been polished as it has in their OLED televisions.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design that we have known for years. Thanks to the nanofilter, the TV is capable of displaying better, cleaner colors than standard budget TVs, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay a very weak black level and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during nighttime viewings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not only from brands like TCL or Hisense but... at LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider color gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless wide viewing angles are your only priority, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the cost of tragic blacks and a higher expenditure) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Average
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

We took a close look at the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, equipped with a high-contrast VA panel. However, in the case of Mini-LED TVs, it's not just the panel itself, but primarily the number and operation of local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted as many as 308 zones, which already looks impressive from the start. For comparison – last year's QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only around 160. The difference is enormous and shows that LG has made a significant step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but practice quickly dampens the enthusiasm. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed impress – bright elements are clearly separated from black, and in many scenes, the depth effect truly pleases the eye. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in backlight construction, the results are not much better than in last year's model. The algorithms controlling dimming can be too aggressive. This is especially noticeable in darker sequences, where the screen dims to such an extent that subtle details disappear from view. Many viewers will appreciate the stronger black, but it is hard to ignore that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic are scenes with many small, bright elements. It is during these moments that typical halo effects, or glowing outlines, associated with LCDs featuring local dimming zones appear around them. This phenomenon does not completely ruin the experience, but it serves as a reminder that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we have the impression that the manufacturer did not pay enough attention to optimizing the new model when it comes to black and contrast.

The NanoCell series, including the NANO81 model we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who has even a little knowledge about screens, this means one thing: significant problems with black levels and contrast. Our measurements are ruthless here. A result of 800:1 is, quite frankly, a tragic score. In practice, this means that what should appear on the screen as deep black looks like a dark gray blot at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will simply be torturous – the image will lose all its depth and will appear flat. If you decide to go with this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: don't watch it in complete darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it's best to leave a soft light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install an LED strip behind the television. Such wall lighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grayness on the screen seem a bit darker. Nonetheless, the start of the test in terms of cinematic experiences looks bleak.

HDR effect quality

5.8/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A did not directly translate to a noticeably better contrast, one cannot deny that this model is brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real movie scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with white or bright lights, the screen was able to maintain high luminance, which produced a truly decent incredible HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the television could show its true class, namely in scenes that require precision, all the magic evaporates. The dimming algorithms we mentioned earlier are aggressive enough that small bright objects—such as distant lights, stars, or the moon—can almost completely disappear. Just look at the test scenes from the movie Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) to see how subtle details are dimmed to the brink of visibility. It's a shame, because a greater number of zones could theoretically lead to significantly better results. Fortunately, there are also stronger points. The QNED93A performs well in terms of color gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colors in movies look vivid and full, and the picture does not lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. So it can be said that the HDR in this model is solid, although the unfinished local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

If you're counting on HDR in the NANO81A to bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is simply too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of just 250 nits, HDR here essentially exists only on paper. In practice, during a viewing session, it's very hard to distinguish whether we're watching high dynamic range content or regular SDR – it simply lacks that "punch" of light in bright areas of the image. But, to not have all criticism, we do have a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel – and it’s quite clear. It's about color gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. This is really a solid result that positions this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LED lights without any filters. Of course, it's still a bit lacking compared to the level of quantum dot TVs (QLED) or advanced panels with PFS filtering, but for this price range, the colors are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It's just a shame that this low brightness doesn’t allow them to fully "spread their wings" with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In movie mode (specifically Filmmaker), color reproduction on the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although it wasn't without critiques. In SDR content, white balance leaned towards warmer tones, resulting in a slight yellowing across the entire screen. Gamma, on the other hand, led to a slight brightening of the image, making it look a bit less natural, especially in scenes requiring precise shading (this is evident in the comparison picture). This isn't a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the picture deviates from the aesthetic intended by the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation looked somewhat different. The white balance presented itself quite well here, ensuring that whites didn't lean towards pink or unwanted shades of green. However, brightness management proved to be an issue. Analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments the television can be noticeably too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some detail and reducing the realism of scenes. This detracted from the experience of HDR effects, which were theoretically supposed to be the most impressive. For this reason, we decided to carry out calibration.

For every movie fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. This mode is designed to display the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements." Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left something to be desired. The main issue turned out to be white balance. Measurements showed a clear deficiency of blue color, which practically translated to many scenes having a slightly yellowish, almost "too yellow" tint. The white was not perfectly clean, which detracted from the freshness of the image. Additionally, brightness management was not ideal either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, losing its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price segment, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration capabilities of this model are immense, which is a big plus for those who like to "dig around" in the menu. We decided to approach the topic in our own way and see how much we could extract from this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode on the QNED93A gained the most where it matters most in everyday use. It was possible to adjust the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality films. This makes colors look natural and pleasant, and the overall experience is much more comfortable. In HDR mode, we also made adjustments, but the biggest problem here turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG provides some leeway in the settings, the television still manages brightness on its own terms. It is evident that the local dimming algorithms are not entirely refined and can spoil the viewing experience by dimming parts of the image at inappropriate moments. Nonetheless, it is worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for daily viewing.

After calibrating the NANO81A, it's a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools even in such an inexpensive model deserves a big plus. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colors natural, juicy, and simply "true." In SDR content (such as regular TV, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks infinitely better – it's clear, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It's evident that this panel has considerable potential, which is simply wasted by poor presets out of the box. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The algorithm LG uses in this model is designed very conservatively. The television deliberately dims the image in HDR to avoid overexposing an already weak black from the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black will turn light gray, or reduce the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Nevertheless, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is significantly better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

9.3/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is really good. In most scenes, there are no artificial color divisions or banding effects. Dark shots are particularly surprising – this is where many TVs struggle, but here the image remains smooth and cohesive. In brighter sections, subtle color transitions can be observed, but they are not pronounced enough to draw significant attention. During testing, we encountered a clear issue with the DSE effect, also known as the "dirty screen" effect. On our unit, the phenomenon was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners noticeably darkened, giving the image a vignetted appearance. This could be a flaw of the test unit, but during intense viewing, it was hard to ignore.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element where NANO81A really shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically did not record the phenomenon of banding, that is, the annoying "steps" visible where one color should smoothly transition into another. Everything looks incredibly natural and smooth. This is especially evident in the bright scenes from the movie Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artifacts. However, even more impressive is how the television handles the extremely challenging, dark, and foggy shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and deliver ugly splotches instead of a smooth mist, the NANO81A maintains its composure, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is that with darker shades, you will notice the weaker blacks of this TV rather than any issues with color transitions.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

LG QNED93A proves to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor handles scaling excellently, ensuring that even older movies or terrestrial television gain sharpness and detail. During the screening of "The Godfather," it's clearly visible how upscaling pulls extra details from the image – the characters' faces and the texture of the clothing appear much clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function for reducing unwanted color banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the "Medium" setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without over-interfering with the image. This way, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen doesn't appear unnaturally smoothed. Perhaps in some scenes, you can still notice slight color banding, but in practice, the effect is more favorable than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels mercilessly bring all the "dirt" and imperfections of lower resolution materials to light. However, in the case of the LG NANO81A, the situation is quite different. It’s a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that is far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature that you will find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating color banding, which is a lifesaver when watching low bitrate materials, for example from some streaming services or older files from the internet. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less efficient chip than in LG's top models here, too aggressive an adjustment of this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or a slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.6/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
56%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

LG QNED93A is equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly making their way into televisions can be seen as a positive development. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this regard, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the image through the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion character with visible frames and a fully smoothed theatrical motion.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a few drawbacks. The TV is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat unsatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast-moving objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been designed with gamers in mind. Right from the start, we get a complete package – all four HDMI ports operate at standard 2.1, so whether we connect a console, PC, or receiver, we can be sure of full compatibility. This is important because many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing prevents all equipment from having maximum capabilities. There’s also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console starts up, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This ensures that the image does not stutter or tear, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is sufficient for consoles, in the case of PCs, the QNED93A allows for even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, which makes a difference especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in games – the television supports the HGiG mode, which provides guidelines to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as intended by the game developers. For dessert, we get Game Bar – a special informational strip invoked on the screen that shows parameters in real-time. You can check the frame rate, active VRR functions, or input lag levels. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts, but for anyone who wants to quickly verify what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed for e-sports. The lack of support for a 120 Hz signal is a fact that users planning to purchase this model must simply come to terms with. Nevertheless, LG engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum capabilities out of this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience. Above all, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. As a result, the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low-latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. Managing these settings is incredibly simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick overview of parameters without leaving the game. A significant advantage is the support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it enables the TV to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which unfortunately is a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
13 ms
1080p120
7 ms
2160p60
16 ms
12 ms
2160p120
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
15 ms
12 ms
2160p120
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

In the latency field, the LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of. The TV responds instantly to our actions, which is evident from the first tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, meaning nearly instant response – shots, passes, and precise movements of the stick immediately translate to the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result slightly increases to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the full comfort zone. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for games, which works with the Xbox Series X on the QNED93A. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a deterioration, but in practice, it’s still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

In terms of response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is about 12 ms. This is a very low result, which means one thing for a gamer – the delay between moving the joystick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically imperceptible. The television performs excellently in dynamic titles, where every millisecond matters, and in this regard, it does not fall behind significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

A new feature in this year's model is full support for 144 Hz refresh rate, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, and with AMD products, where it supports FreeSync Premium Pro. This ensures smooth gameplay without screen tearing or stuttering, and the panel itself performs very well in dynamic esports titles and demanding AAA productions.

Equally important is the clarity of the image in everyday work. The television supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and applications are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a small detail - with a dark background and bright letters, subtle horizontal lines may appear due to the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the comfort of using the television on a daily basis, but perfectionists may notice it after spending more time with text. But we don't think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen with text sitting less than 1 meter away from it 😉.

Nano81A is a really solid monitor for text work. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4, fonts are very clear and sharp – practically anyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We only noticed one small detail that we caught with our laboratory scrutiny: vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than those horizontal ones. However, this phenomenon is minimal enough that we decided not to deduct points for it. The ratings went down only for features typical for PC gamers – it lacks G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz, which will be a significant drawback for those looking for a screen for fast-paced computer games.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
66%

QNED93A uses a VA matrix, and that means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at an angle of about 45 degrees, brightness drops by as much as 80%, and colors begin to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast that VA panels offer. There is no additional coating to improve angles, as found in some more expensive models, so the QNED93A looks best when viewed directly. If you are planning a large family viewing, where some viewers will sit more to the side, you should expect that the image will not be as attractive as it is at the center of the screen.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the black and contrast category. Thanks to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles are simply very good here. This is where the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality, even when viewed from a wide angle. This makes the NANO81A a great option for those who have a wide furniture layout in their living room or frequently watch games and movies with a larger group.

Daytime performance

6.2/10

4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix that handles reflections moderately well. It is certainly not at the level of matte screens, but it doesn't have the mirror-like effect seen in models with a glossy surface. As a result, reflections are not too bothersome, and colors maintain their intensity even when light from the window hits the screen. Brightness is also a plus. The average level in HDR mode stays within 550-600 nits. This means that the television performs well in well-lit rooms, and you can enjoy a viewing experience even during the day when the blinds are only partially closed. In the role of a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A really performs well.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness reaching around 250 nits, it is hard to recommend it wholeheartedly for very bright, heavily sunlit living rooms – under such conditions, the image will simply lack punch. Nevertheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin panel used here dampens reflections quite decently. As a result, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won't see reflections of every detail from your surroundings on the screen. So, if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing experience will be quite possible, but this model was simply not designed to "fight" against full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

8.2/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features

Smart Features

QNED93A operates under webOS, one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It includes AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is reasonably clear and mostly fast, although in the tested unit, there were instances where the response to pressing the remote required a moment of "thought." However, it is hard to consider this a serious issue – webOS remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates to improve it even more.

Classic Features

In this model, LG did not include the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the TV itself performs excellently as a screen for everyday viewing of antenna channels. The EPG interface is clear, the TV offers a television guide, and we have the ability to record programs from the built-in tuners directly onto a USB drive. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We only missed the PiP function, which in 2025 is offered by just two manufacturers.

Magic Remote

The Magic remote is still the biggest difference compared to the competition. In 2025, it underwent a slight facelift – it has fewer buttons and resembles the minimalist remotes from Samsung a bit. However, the cursor remained key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It’s incredibly simple yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is much faster, and it’s hard to switch back to classic buttons afterwards.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the biggest advantages of the NANO81A model is its “brain,” which is the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of fluidity and user experience is on par with the more expensive models of this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure – there is no sign of irritating lags that often occur with budget competitors. All of this is thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual makeover this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism – the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It sits perfectly in the hand, but this change has a downside as well. The physical number pad has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will not be a problem. However, older household members, who are used to entering channel numbers from memory, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of features we would call “classic,” the NANO81A relies on proven standards. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television tasks. The handling of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including the old good Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connections to game console controllers or wireless headphones and speakers. It’s simply a TV that “works” – it is stable, predictable, and does not create unnecessary complications in daily use.

Apps

9.1/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats without any issues, so it’s perfectly sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor hiccups. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which is Apple’s photo format. The manufacturer claims that the television should open them, but in practice, we were unable to confirm that. The second issue involved text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, other, more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it's hard to consider this a real limitation in everyday use.

Many users still use their own USB drives to display movies or photos on the big screen. In this regard, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most movie libraries will start up "right away." However, it is important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are limited to what the manufacturer has prepared for us. There is no possibility of installing alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player cannot handle something, there is not much that can be done about it. During tests, we encountered a few specific limitations. Above all, there is a lack of support for HEIC files. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from the USB drive, the TV simply will not see them – it's worth changing the format to JPG on your phone right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulty processing very large graphic files. Photos with a resolution of around 20–28 Mpix may not load or cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, daily multimedia handling is hassle-free.

Sound

6.9/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for the built-in speakers in the television. The sound is fairly clear, and at moderate volume levels, vocals and dialogues come across distinctly. The bass, as is usually the case in relatively slim constructions, is not the strongest, but its presence can be felt and is completely sufficient for everyday viewing of series. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and does not lead to strong distortions, although in more demanding cinematic scenes, it's noticeable that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as acceptable and not off-putting. It definitely won't compete with a soundbar, but it also won't ruin your movie experience.

When it comes to audio, the LG NANO81A pleasantly surprises compared to its higher-positioned sibling, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, NanoCell sounds slightly better, which is likely due to its somewhat thicker casing. The increased volume allows for the extraction of some low-end nuances – the bass may not be powerful, but it is more distinctly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one shouldn't expect miracles. It is still a standard 2.0 speaker arrangement with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristics remain similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are acceptable, making dialogues in movies and news programs clear. While this slight improvement in the lower registers is pleasing, for true home cinema or music listening, it is still worth considering the purchase of at least a simple soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC