LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

QNED85A / QNED86A / QNED87A / A6A / A6B / A6C

Info

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”100”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.0

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.1

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    8.3

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.0

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    5.8

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    8.4

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    6.5

Advantages

  • 120 Hz panel, good for sports and gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Great for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG, etc.)

  • Full set of HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Good compatibility with PC (great font readability)

  • Bright picture (around 700 nits in HDR), works well in moderately bright rooms

  • Good viewing angles (IPS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • User-friendly webOS operating system with Magic Remote and voice assistant

  • Ability to record programs to USB

  • Very good contrast and black: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Pretty high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional mode for gamers: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide range of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very poor black and contrast due to the IPS panel

  • Lack of the declared 144 Hz in PC mode

  • Aggressive "light bars" when dimming is enabled (edge local dimming ruins evening movie screenings)

  • Confusion in markings and versions – even TVs with the same name in different stores can have different stands (central or two legs) or frame colors, which can be very misleading when purchasing.

  • The matrix is heavily smudged

  • Strong visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor system errors

  • Significant chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

QNED86A6A is a television that really does a great job in its price class when it comes to sports, gaming, and everyday TV watching. The 120 Hz panel makes the picture smooth and the motion sharp, which will be appreciated by both fans and gamers. Additionally, it has low input lag along with a full set of gaming features such as HGiG, VRR, and ALLM. The TV works just as well with a computer as it does with a console, so in the office or on a desk in the 43” version, it will perform excellently as a work monitor. Another strong point is the webOS system. It is a fast, stable, and app-rich operating system that, paired with the Magic remote, provides very convenient control. The new version of the remote is slimmer and fits better in the hand, and the cursor on the screen is a solution that many competitors lack. It also includes classic features – USB recording, Bluetooth for headphones, and a full set of HDMI 2.1 with eARC and Dolby Atmos support. This makes the QNED85 series TVs some of the most "multimedia" televisions in their class. But let's not sugarcoat it; this model also has its significant drawbacks. Its biggest flaw is undoubtedly the contrast, or rather the lack of it. The IPS panel combined with edge "mini-LED" is simply a very bad idea. The screen is simply not suitable for watching movies in a dark living room. The blacks are grayish-blue, and local dimming can generate light stripes resembling lasers, which effectively ruins the viewing experience. For home theater, this is not a choice that can be recommended with full conviction. The second problem may not be directly related to the TV itself but to its sales. It concerns the chaos in naming and the differences in derivative versions. The same model, even with the same designation, can have a different frame color or stand depending on the store. This can really be frustrating for the buyer and create a sense of confusion. In summary: LG QNED86A6A is a great TV for sports, gaming, and everyday television, with a convenient system and great functionality. But if you are looking for a screen specifically for movies or series and require deep blacks, it is better to look towards TVs that can truly be called Mini-LEDs with full confidence.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. And indeed, in many ways it's a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good black levels and brightness that rivals more expensive models. In fact, it's identical to the slightly more expensive C6K model, which we've already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features, making it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the positive impression is marred by the performance of the panel used. The television suffers from noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) makes the image often appear unnatural and artificial—as if it were being forced to be sharper. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS isn’t its flaws, but rather its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or just slightly less) as the full-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete design without those annoying flaws. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition—if its price drops drastically. For now, opting for the (often symbolic) additional cost to the C6K model remains a much safer and better choice. One could mischievously state that the letter "S" in the name actually stands for "Slim." It's just that it's not about an exceptionally slim case, but about how much this model has been "slimmed down" in terms of capabilities compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

3.5/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,050:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,850:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Although the manufacturer describes the QNED86A as a Mini-LED television, one would be hard-pressed to find the multi-zone local dimming system known from more expensive models. In practice, we are dealing with classic edge lighting that only allows for dimming horizontal bands of the screen from top to bottom. Combined with the low-contrast IPS/ADS panel, the effect is simply poor. If we decide to keep local dimming enabled, a problem arises – the television can illuminate selected areas in such a way that it appears like “flying lasers” crossing the screen. This is very distracting, and it is difficult to claim a truly cinematic experience under such conditions. Therefore, in our opinion, it is better to disable this function. However, one has to reckon with the fact that the contrast then drops to around 1500:1, but at least the image does not irritate with artificial flashes.

Let's move on to what tigers like best, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) was due to drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black levels and contrast. In direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model hardly falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we find a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. What’s most interesting – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests, we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones in the C6KS (of the same size) as in the tested more expensive counterpart! The black levels are very good. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major issues that often plague budget models without local dimming. Of course, we can't cheat physics. We must expect that in very demanding scenes (e.g., bright text on a black background), we will sometimes notice undesirable effects such as blooming (halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – overall, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

6/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.4%, Bt.2020: 73.4%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

690 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

512 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

Against the backdrop of contrast and black, the brightness of the QNED86A and the overall HDR effect performs much better. This is a television that can reach around 700 nits in the best conditions, so in terms of brightness alone, there is nothing to be ashamed of. As a result, scenes with strong lights, explosions, flashes, or bright parts of the landscape look clear and can make an impression. Interestingly, even in more challenging moments with small, contrasting elements on the screen, the television handles their backlighting well, and the details are quite visible. The problem resurfaces when there are a lot of dark tones. The lack of effective local dimming causes black to virtually disappear, and instead, we get a gray glow spreading across the entire screen. This kills the sense of depth and makes the image look flat, as if it lacks a cinematic quality. In bright animations or colorful family films, this won't be an issue because colors and bright light dominate there. But in horrors or productions set in darkness, these limitations are very palpable. As a consolation, it’s worth mentioning that the QNED86A is actually a QLED television with a PFS LED filter, which gives it very good coverage of wide color gamuts. Both the DCI-P3 palette and the wider BT.2020 perform really solid here. This ensures that colors in HDR films are saturated, vibrant, and have the right depth – even if the black itself disappoints, the colors can save the viewing experience and make the image look attractive.

And how does the issue of HDR look? Here the C6KS performs quite well and – as is becoming a recurring theme in this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must remember the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible black levels. It’s a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, “true black” more than additional micro-details that could cause grayness on the screen. Such is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It’s also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the tagline of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colors are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide color gamut reaches 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

5.6/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We primarily tested the QNED86A in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to provide the most accurate picture. Unfortunately, right out of the box, there were quite a few shortcomings. The most noticeable issue was the poorly adjusted white balance – there was a lack of blue, causing the overall image to lean slightly yellow, and at times, even orange. An even bigger problem turned out to be the way the television manages brightness. Due to its technical limitations – namely, local dimming that only works along the edges of the screen – the QNED86A tends to over-brighten entire scenes. This is where the flattening effect we mentioned earlier comes from. Instead of distinct depth and contrast, we get something akin to "boosted brightness," which can strain the eye over time.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option labeled Filmmaker Mode in the menu. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of color reproduction, the absence of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers nearly identical picture characteristics to the aforementioned Filmmaker mode in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. So if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colors – the answer is: no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.6/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

What was saved in the QNED86A6A is undoubtedly the colors. After calibration, the white balance was set with great precision, resulting in deviations on the Colour Checker palette mostly not exceeding the threshold of visibility for the human eye. In other words – the colors finally looked natural, without strange yellow or orange tones that previously ruined the experience. Unfortunately, even the best calibration cannot bypass design limitations. The already mentioned very modest number of local dimming zones and their unfortunate placement made the analysis of the EOTF curve in films still show clear over-brightening of scenes. The image tended to flatten, lacking cinematic depth. Fortunately, this effect is not as noticeable in older productions or SDR content. There, calibration really does its job and allows taming the QNED in such a way that the image can be pleasing. However, the specifics of this design – especially the contrast issues – cannot be entirely overcome.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the tendency of the C69KS to distort colors has been effectively reduced, leading to a very good final effect. After calibration, we won't see excessive warmth in SDR scenes or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it's worth noting the brightness characteristic. In SDR content, there are hardly any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programs, or materials from YouTube. It is much more difficult to evaluate the performance of the television in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behavior, but its practical variant shows certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times it can dim the entire scene. Calibration has therefore brought clear benefits in terms of color reproduction, but certain limitations arising from the operation of local dimming and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be avoided, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

4.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The blending of colors is one of the stronger points of the QNED86A. In everyday viewing, the image appears really smooth, without noticeable "steps" or sudden transitions between colors. The television handles color blending quite naturally, so with most materials, it's hard to spot issues with gradation. Any imperfections only appear in extreme conditions – for example, in the darkest scenes of movies, where even much more expensive televisions can have problems. There, you might notice slight banding or characteristic stripes, but these are marginal situations that shouldn't interfere with normal usage. Overall, the QNED86A performs well in this category and has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the competition.

Looking solely at the smoothness of tonal transitions, the C69KS gives no real reason for complaints. The gradation of colors proceeds correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. Therefore, you might be surprised by the low score in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final score is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

If someone is worried about possible "steps" when connecting colors, there is a simple way in the QNED86A. Just turn on the feature called Smooth Gradation and set it to medium level. Then the TV really smooths out all those unwanted transitions – especially in older productions – and does it in such a way that the film grain doesn't disappear, nor do strange artifacts appear. In other words, you can use it without worry.

The upscaling itself also turns out quite well. Of course, there are no miracles here – with lower quality sources, you can observe characteristic jaggedness. Fortunately, there is a sharpness slider in the menu, and if someone prefers a more "softer" image, it can be quickly adjusted to their taste.

C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a significant amount of detail is preserved, and the algorithm adds a subtle "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. However, the smoothing of tonal transitions is lacking. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a somewhat raw state. With older materials, this can be simply exhausting, as the lack of additional processing highlights all imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
62%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The QNED86A is equipped with a 120 Hz refresh rate panel, so right from the start, it's safe to say that it's suitable for both sports and gaming. And indeed, this is true – the image looks smooth, and motion blur is not very noticeable. IPS panels have always had some issues with this, and you can sometimes notice slight blurring here as well, especially in very dynamic scenes, but it's not something that ruins watching a match or a fast-paced game. For movie and sports fans, LG has added the traditional TruMotion smoother. In the menu, we have two sliders – one for movies (De-Judder), the other for sports (De-Blur). The first adds missing frames and allows you to adjust the character of motion – from raw, cinematic to more fluid, "theatrical." The second enhances sharpness during dynamic actions, so it's worth turning it up a bit if you're watching a lot of sports.

C69KS offers a simplified motion improvement panel in movies, allowing you to adjust the intensity of the effect using a slider. This makes it easy to match the smoothness to your own preferences. The possibility of using higher refresh rates is also a plus – even though the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p allows you to enable 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, but in practice, the image at these settings suffers from significant motion blur. The effect is noticeable enough that the overall experience feels simply mediocre and loses its appeal in everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of gaming, the LG QNED86A6A is a complete tool. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, which means that whether you connect a PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, or a powerful PC – everything will work at full 4K 120 Hz with support for all features. This is a big plus, as some competitors still have only two such ports, which can be problematic with a larger number of devices. It also has VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing, and ALLM, which automatically activates game mode when the console is turned on. There’s also Dolby Vision Gaming and a proper implementation of the HGiG format, so titles supporting these formats look more vivid and detailed. Added to all of this is the Game Optimizer – a kind of control center for the gamer. From this level, you can view image parameters in real-time, quickly change modes, activate additional features, or adjust image settings to your preferences. The LG QNED86A6A essentially has everything one can expect from a modern gaming television.

If we overlook the smearing and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything you can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a reasonably functioning HGiG. The TV can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings during gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a truly successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
9 ms
1080p120
6 ms
2160p60
14 ms
9 ms
2160p120
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
9 ms
2160p120
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
9 ms
2160p120 DV
6 ms

There's really nothing to complain about here. The QNED86A6A achieves excellent results – around 5 ms for 120 Hz content and about 15 ms for 60 Hz. These are values that will easily satisfy both console gamers and those who connect a PC to the TV. The response to movements is instantaneous, so you can forget about delays between the image and the action on the controller.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, which makes reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

8/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
6ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The LG QNED86A, thanks to its IPS matrix, full RGB subpixel layout, and correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, makes fonts look stunning. Text is sharp, clear, and legible, making this TV great for office work. This is important because this year the model is also debuting in a 43" size, and such a variant can comfortably land on a desk and serve as a large monitor. Of course, some users who opt for the 43" will be gamers, and there are also no complaints here. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, so gameplay is smooth and enjoyable. It’s a bit of a shame that there's no higher refresh rate mode like the 144Hz declared by the manufacturer, as PC gamers would surely appreciate that. Nevertheless, the QNED86A6A performs really well as a monitor for gaming and work.

Besides the previously mentioned option of operating at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor—the darkest ones have a distinct rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that extended work at the computer can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

6.9/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
61%
80%

QNED86A6A performs very well in this regard. The IPS panel used here ensures that the image retains its brightness and color saturation even when viewed at an angle. There is no fading effect that often appears in cheaper TVs with VA panels. Of course, there is no comparison to the level offered by organic panels, where colors and contrast hold up perfectly at almost any angle. But for an LCD TV, it is definitely one of the better results and is easily sufficient for watching movies or sports together on the couch with a larger group.

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA panels. This is a compromise we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good head-on, but any significant deviation quickly results in drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

5.8/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A: 462 cd/m2

QNED86A6A is not a brightness master, but it manages just fine. Thanks to the moderately high brightness of the panel and quite decent glare reduction, the television performs well in typical, moderately lit living rooms. The image remains clear, and colors do not lose their intensity in daylight. However, let’s not kid ourselves; this is not a screen that will handle extremely bright conditions, where sunlight pours in through huge windows and floods the room.

C6KS performs really well as a TV viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits easily cuts through challenging lighting conditions. In addition, there is a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections. As a result, the television surprisingly holds up well during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

8.4/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

Smart Features: webOS

QNED86A6A runs on the well-known webOS – a system that has been a strong point of LG TVs for years. Everything operates quickly and stably, and apps launch without significant delays, though the interface can be somewhat overwhelmed by advertisements at times. Fortunately, the convenience is more noticeable in daily use than the shortcomings. A significant advantage is the Magic Remote, which allows you to control the cursor like a mouse – it's one of those features that you can easily get used to and later find hard to give up. The new version of the remote is slimmer as it has been stripped of the numeric keypad. Some will appreciate the simplicity, while others will miss the classic set of buttons; it's more a matter of habit.

Classic Features

Onboard, there are also a few solutions that are not always obvious in 2025. There is the ability to record programs from built-in DVB-T2 tuners onto USB, so you can calmly return to a match or series at any moment. In the evening, Bluetooth headphone support will come in handy – especially if someone in the house falls asleep faster than we do. Additionally, there is a full set of HDMI 2.1 ports with eARC support and audio formats like Dolby Digital and Dolby Atmos.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It is an environment that offers a lot—ideal for those who prioritize a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and voice assistant features work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply convenient.

The support for traditional television is somewhat lacking. Users who expect extensive "TV" features may feel overlooked. Besides the efficiently working Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Apps

9.1/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.9/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the QNED86A6A performs quite well with the most popular audio and video formats. During testing, we had no trouble playing MP4, MKV, or MP3 files; everything played smoothly without glitches. The TV also handled most images, although here we encountered a typical barrier for many manufacturers – the lack of full support for the HEIC format from Apple. So, if you regularly use an iPhone and store photos in this standard, you'll need to convert them beforehand or, preferably, transfer them using AirPlay. Other than that, it's hard to find fault as the built-in solution is really decent.

The system player really delivers and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hiccup occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g., HEIC) – here, TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, such as VLC. This way, you can quickly address the shortcomings of the factory player, allowing you to play practically any material, customizing the TV to your preferences.

Sound

6/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

In terms of sound, the QNED86A6A performs quite decently, but let's not hide it – this is not the level that will impress home cinema enthusiasts. The sound is clean and clear, dialogues are easily heard, but overall it sounds rather flat and there is definitely a lack of solid bass. For everyday watching of television, streaming services, or news, this is an acceptable level; however, if you plan to watch movies or play games more often, even a basic soundbar will make a significant difference.

TCL C6KS performs almost identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same set of speakers branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth remembering the proper perspective. This bass performs decently against other televisions, but a home theater setup or even a basic soundbar will still offer a much fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS is suitable for regular television watching, but if someone is keen on a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be a natural choice.

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data