LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A vs Philips MLED920 / MLED910

Direct comparison

QNED85A / QNED86A / QNED87A / A6A / A6B / A6C

Info

MLED920 / MLED910

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”100”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.0

6.5

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.1

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    8.3

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.0

    4.0

  • Watching in bright light

    5.8

    5.5

  • Utility functions

    8.4

    5.5

  • Apps

    9.1

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    6.2

Advantages

  • 120 Hz panel, good for sports and gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Great for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG, etc.)

  • Full set of HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Good compatibility with PC (great font readability)

  • Bright picture (around 700 nits in HDR), works well in moderately bright rooms

  • Good viewing angles (IPS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • User-friendly webOS operating system with Magic Remote and voice assistant

  • Ability to record programs to USB

  • Solid black and high contrast thanks to mini-LED backlighting

  • HDR brightness reaching 700–800 nits in real movie scenes

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Ambilight – a feature that adds atmosphere, especially in the evening

  • Lots of supported audio formats: DTS:X, Dolby Atmos, Dolby True HD 7.1

  • 144 Hz panel with support for VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Loud sound (up to 88 dB)

  • Illuminated remote

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very poor black and contrast due to the IPS panel

  • Lack of the declared 144 Hz in PC mode

  • Aggressive "light bars" when dimming is enabled (edge local dimming ruins evening movie screenings)

  • Confusion in markings and versions – even TVs with the same name in different stores can have different stands (central or two legs) or frame colors, which can be very misleading when purchasing.

  • Titan OS is quite underdeveloped – there are significant bugs and deficiencies in the applications

  • Few user features

  • Hybrid infrared remote control

  • Issues with the fluidity of tonal transitions in dark scenes

  • The TV is not suitable (aside from gaming) for collaboration with a PC – strong dithering and poor readability of fonts, especially colored ones and on dark backgrounds

Our verdict

QNED86A6A is a television that really does a great job in its price class when it comes to sports, gaming, and everyday TV watching. The 120 Hz panel makes the picture smooth and the motion sharp, which will be appreciated by both fans and gamers. Additionally, it has low input lag along with a full set of gaming features such as HGiG, VRR, and ALLM. The TV works just as well with a computer as it does with a console, so in the office or on a desk in the 43” version, it will perform excellently as a work monitor. Another strong point is the webOS system. It is a fast, stable, and app-rich operating system that, paired with the Magic remote, provides very convenient control. The new version of the remote is slimmer and fits better in the hand, and the cursor on the screen is a solution that many competitors lack. It also includes classic features – USB recording, Bluetooth for headphones, and a full set of HDMI 2.1 with eARC and Dolby Atmos support. This makes the QNED85 series TVs some of the most "multimedia" televisions in their class. But let's not sugarcoat it; this model also has its significant drawbacks. Its biggest flaw is undoubtedly the contrast, or rather the lack of it. The IPS panel combined with edge "mini-LED" is simply a very bad idea. The screen is simply not suitable for watching movies in a dark living room. The blacks are grayish-blue, and local dimming can generate light stripes resembling lasers, which effectively ruins the viewing experience. For home theater, this is not a choice that can be recommended with full conviction. The second problem may not be directly related to the TV itself but to its sales. It concerns the chaos in naming and the differences in derivative versions. The same model, even with the same designation, can have a different frame color or stand depending on the store. This can really be frustrating for the buyer and create a sense of confusion. In summary: LG QNED86A6A is a great TV for sports, gaming, and everyday television, with a convenient system and great functionality. But if you are looking for a screen specifically for movies or series and require deep blacks, it is better to look towards TVs that can truly be called Mini-LEDs with full confidence.

The Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year's PML9000 model, but it's not a repeat performance. It's clear that the manufacturer has done its homework – first and foremost, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year tended to significantly degrade the viewing experience. Now, the blacks and contrast look much better, and when combined with the Dolby Vision here, even HDR content looks really decent. The picture occasionally shines where it should, and it doesn’t strain the eyes in more challenging scenes. Undoubtedly, the biggest advantage of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a completely new atmosphere – the screen seems to extend beyond its borders, and the entire room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that will be appreciated not only by movie enthusiasts but also by gamers, who, in addition to the lights, get a whole set of features typical for modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. However, there is a significant caveat – this brings us to the most difficult part of this verdict – it is still dual-purpose equipment. On one hand, we have strong picture quality and a unique Ambilight feature, while on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a significant bottleneck, filled with bugs and shortcomings that make the television lag behind the competition. Additionally, the price is not low considering the offered capabilities. Therefore, it's hard to recommend it unequivocally to everyone. However, if you are looking for the brightest Philips screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of features for gamers, and basic applications – the MLED920 will be quite a good choice.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

3.5/10

7.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 144 (12 x 12)

Contrast:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,050:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,850:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

298,900:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

38,500:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

23,950:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Although the manufacturer describes the QNED86A as a Mini-LED television, one would be hard-pressed to find the multi-zone local dimming system known from more expensive models. In practice, we are dealing with classic edge lighting that only allows for dimming horizontal bands of the screen from top to bottom. Combined with the low-contrast IPS/ADS panel, the effect is simply poor. If we decide to keep local dimming enabled, a problem arises – the television can illuminate selected areas in such a way that it appears like “flying lasers” crossing the screen. This is very distracting, and it is difficult to claim a truly cinematic experience under such conditions. Therefore, in our opinion, it is better to disable this function. However, one has to reckon with the fact that the contrast then drops to around 1500:1, but at least the image does not irritate with artificial flashes.

The Philips MLED920 in the 55-inch version that we had the opportunity to test uses a high-contrast VA panel. The panel itself is one thing, but the true distinguishing feature of this model is the mini-LED backlighting. This largely determines how black levels and contrast appear – and it must be said that Philips has made a significant leap forward compared to the models from 2024, where the local dimming algorithms performed just mediocrely. In this new version, it's much better, and the contrast presented by the MLED920 can really pleasantly surprise. At times, it even resembles the level known from the best LCD TVs on the market – blacks can be deep, the image gains three-dimensionality, and viewing sessions in a dark room create a great impression. Of course, as is the case with any mini-LED TV, this is not an image entirely free from compromises. With a large amount of fine details on the screen, the local dimming algorithms can sometimes get confused – sometimes dimming details more than we would like, and at other times brightening the background, resulting in slight light blue halos around objects (the so-called halo effect). Despite these imperfections, we must emphasize that black levels and contrast are truly a strong point of the Philips MLED920 and definitely one of the reasons to consider it in the mid-range.

HDR effect quality

6/10

5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.4%, Bt.2020: 73.4%
DCI P3: 89.9%, Bt.2020: 65.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

690 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

512 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

722 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

775 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

131 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

Against the backdrop of contrast and black, the brightness of the QNED86A and the overall HDR effect performs much better. This is a television that can reach around 700 nits in the best conditions, so in terms of brightness alone, there is nothing to be ashamed of. As a result, scenes with strong lights, explosions, flashes, or bright parts of the landscape look clear and can make an impression. Interestingly, even in more challenging moments with small, contrasting elements on the screen, the television handles their backlighting well, and the details are quite visible. The problem resurfaces when there are a lot of dark tones. The lack of effective local dimming causes black to virtually disappear, and instead, we get a gray glow spreading across the entire screen. This kills the sense of depth and makes the image look flat, as if it lacks a cinematic quality. In bright animations or colorful family films, this won't be an issue because colors and bright light dominate there. But in horrors or productions set in darkness, these limitations are very palpable. As a consolation, it’s worth mentioning that the QNED86A is actually a QLED television with a PFS LED filter, which gives it very good coverage of wide color gamuts. Both the DCI-P3 palette and the wider BT.2020 perform really solid here. This ensures that colors in HDR films are saturated, vibrant, and have the right depth – even if the black itself disappoints, the colors can save the viewing experience and make the image look attractive.

In our measurements, the Philips MLED920 achieved even around 900 nits in static tests, which is a really solid result for a mid-range TV. In practice, this translates to a lot of satisfaction during viewing sessions – in scenes rich in bright light, such as the first, third, or fifth test screens, the screen was able to generate about 700 nits, which is enough to feel the true "HDR effect." However, it cannot be denied that the limited number of backlighting zones and the compromises of mini-LED dimming algorithms in more demanding scenes reveal their nature. In sequences with small light sources – such as the moon or a scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the television clearly prioritizes maintaining deeper blacks at the expense of the brightness of those small elements. For most viewers, this is still a reasonable compromise, as the dark background tends to look much better, though one must be aware that the details themselves may not impress with intensity. There is also some disappointment regarding colors. Although the applied PFS filter (the equivalent of quantum dots known from QLEDs) does its job and colors appear quite vivid, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color space reaches "only" 90%. In everyday viewing, this will be sufficient, but in extremely colorful productions – such as the latest Disney animations – one can notice that some tones are not as vibrant as they could be in other constructions.

Factory color reproduction

5.6/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We primarily tested the QNED86A in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to provide the most accurate picture. Unfortunately, right out of the box, there were quite a few shortcomings. The most noticeable issue was the poorly adjusted white balance – there was a lack of blue, causing the overall image to lean slightly yellow, and at times, even orange. An even bigger problem turned out to be the way the television manages brightness. Due to its technical limitations – namely, local dimming that only works along the edges of the screen – the QNED86A tends to over-brighten entire scenes. This is where the flattening effect we mentioned earlier comes from. Instead of distinct depth and contrast, we get something akin to "boosted brightness," which can strain the eye over time.

Like every Philips television we tested, we primarily evaluated the MLED920 in Filmmaker mode – this is supposed to be the "most honest" mode, designed for films and to faithfully convey the creators' intentions. Indeed, in terms of colorimetry, it performs the best among all the modes available on the television, but it is not without its flaws. The first thing that stands out is the white balance. The image has a slight tendency to take on purple-pink tones, which gives it a somewhat unnatural character. However, an even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned earlier – image clipping. Just look at the gamma or EOTF graphs to see that the line deviates significantly beyond the norm, falling below the value of 1.8. In practice, this means "clipping" the brightest whites, where the image becomes almost milky. Fortunately, most of these issues can be corrected – the MLED920 responds to calibration, and with a few adjustments, the image quality can be significantly improved.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.6/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

What was saved in the QNED86A6A is undoubtedly the colors. After calibration, the white balance was set with great precision, resulting in deviations on the Colour Checker palette mostly not exceeding the threshold of visibility for the human eye. In other words – the colors finally looked natural, without strange yellow or orange tones that previously ruined the experience. Unfortunately, even the best calibration cannot bypass design limitations. The already mentioned very modest number of local dimming zones and their unfortunate placement made the analysis of the EOTF curve in films still show clear over-brightening of scenes. The image tended to flatten, lacking cinematic depth. Fortunately, this effect is not as noticeable in older productions or SDR content. There, calibration really does its job and allows taming the QNED in such a way that the image can be pleasing. However, the specifics of this design – especially the contrast issues – cannot be entirely overcome.

After calibration, we managed to largely tame the white balance – to the extent that the average viewer will not be able to detect color inaccuracies. The characteristic pink-purple glow that previously disturbed the naturalness of the picture has also disappeared. The color palette has been organized, and the colors appear more consistent and neutral. The gamma in SDR content after calibration looks really good – there's no sign of the earlier “bleeding” effect in bright scenes. The picture has become more contrasted and devoid of the milkiness that previously spoiled the perception significantly. In the case of HDR content, the improvement is also noticeable, although it is still evident that the television is “doing its own thing.” The EOTF curve cannot be fully shaped, as Philips simply does not provide tools in its settings that allow for precise control over this parameter. In many films, the television simply still showcases the image “in its own way.” Despite these limitations, calibration has brought quite a lot of good – it has managed to minimize most of the color inaccuracies and significantly improve the overall balance of the picture. However, it must be remembered that certain barriers arise from the very hardware construction and they simply cannot be overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

6.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The blending of colors is one of the stronger points of the QNED86A. In everyday viewing, the image appears really smooth, without noticeable "steps" or sudden transitions between colors. The television handles color blending quite naturally, so with most materials, it's hard to spot issues with gradation. Any imperfections only appear in extreme conditions – for example, in the darkest scenes of movies, where even much more expensive televisions can have problems. There, you might notice slight banding or characteristic stripes, but these are marginal situations that shouldn't interfere with normal usage. Overall, the QNED86A performs well in this category and has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the competition.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Philips MLED920 is not its strongest suit. In our tests, we quickly noticed that the television has noticeable problems in darker scenes – for example, segments from the movie The Green Knight or test grayscale palettes. There, you can see the characteristic banding of colors and too sharp transitions between shades, which can be quite noticeable in productions with a darker style. Fortunately, the situation looks better in brighter scenes – there the image appears smooth and free of major artifacts.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

If someone is worried about possible "steps" when connecting colors, there is a simple way in the QNED86A. Just turn on the feature called Smooth Gradation and set it to medium level. Then the TV really smooths out all those unwanted transitions – especially in older productions – and does it in such a way that the film grain doesn't disappear, nor do strange artifacts appear. In other words, you can use it without worry.

The upscaling itself also turns out quite well. Of course, there are no miracles here – with lower quality sources, you can observe characteristic jaggedness. Fortunately, there is a sharpness slider in the menu, and if someone prefers a more "softer" image, it can be quickly adjusted to their taste.

The manufacturer equipped this model with several features that improve signal quality, and although we usually approach such "enhancers" with skepticism, they turn out to be really helpful here. The key option is called "distortion reduction" – it works best at a medium level because, on one hand, it effectively smooths out unwanted banding and color transitions, while on the other, it doesn't excessively cut details, which keeps the image looking natural.

The situation is a bit worse with upscaling. Lower quality materials – such as test videos with models – appeared soft and lacking in sharpness. Yes, this can be somewhat corrected with the sharpness slider in the menu, but the effect still remains far from what competitors in a similar price range offer. Philips therefore still needs to work on this aspect because, in light of the successful improvement of tonal transitions, the upscaling simply performs poorly.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
62%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The QNED86A is equipped with a 120 Hz refresh rate panel, so right from the start, it's safe to say that it's suitable for both sports and gaming. And indeed, this is true – the image looks smooth, and motion blur is not very noticeable. IPS panels have always had some issues with this, and you can sometimes notice slight blurring here as well, especially in very dynamic scenes, but it's not something that ruins watching a match or a fast-paced game. For movie and sports fans, LG has added the traditional TruMotion smoother. In the menu, we have two sliders – one for movies (De-Judder), the other for sports (De-Blur). The first adds missing frames and allows you to adjust the character of motion – from raw, cinematic to more fluid, "theatrical." The second enhances sharpness during dynamic actions, so it's worth turning it up a bit if you're watching a lot of sports.

The Philips MLED920 features a 144 Hz panel, which immediately suggests that we shouldn’t complain about motion smoothness. And indeed – the motion blur is relatively low here for a VA panel, and although one might occasionally notice slight issues on darker backgrounds, they are not something that most people would notice during regular viewing.

A major plus is the presence of a motion smoother called "Motion Style." It allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences – if someone prefers a more “theatrical,” almost television-like image, they can increase the sliders, and if they want to preserve the natural “jitter” of a cinematic frame, they just need to set lower values. This way, everyone can find the perfect balance.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of gaming, the LG QNED86A6A is a complete tool. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, which means that whether you connect a PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, or a powerful PC – everything will work at full 4K 120 Hz with support for all features. This is a big plus, as some competitors still have only two such ports, which can be problematic with a larger number of devices. It also has VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing, and ALLM, which automatically activates game mode when the console is turned on. There’s also Dolby Vision Gaming and a proper implementation of the HGiG format, so titles supporting these formats look more vivid and detailed. Added to all of this is the Game Optimizer – a kind of control center for the gamer. From this level, you can view image parameters in real-time, quickly change modes, activate additional features, or adjust image settings to your preferences. The LG QNED86A6A essentially has everything one can expect from a modern gaming television.

For gamers, the Philips MLED920 is truly a complete tool. The manufacturer has taken care of everything that today is considered standard in televisions designed for consoles and PCs. It features ALLM, so the console automatically switches the screen to game mode, it has VRR and 144 Hz refresh rate, which guarantees smooth gameplay even in fast titles. All key HDR formats are supported – including HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming for Xbox – which means that regardless of what you are playing and on which console, the TV will be able to extract maximum potential from the image. In everyday gaming, the Game Bar also proves to be useful – a relatively simple implementation by Philips, but a functional panel where you can quickly check image parameters, turn on VRR, or adjust details without leaving the game. It may not be as advanced as the competition's offerings, but it performs its job flawlessly. And lastly, something that distinguishes Philips from its competitors – Ambilight. The three-sided LED backlighting can make a huge impression in games, especially in the evening. It also provides a way to slightly "expand" the screen and feel greater immersion. And since colorful LEDs have recently become almost a mandatory element of a gamer’s room, the MLED920 fits into this trend perfectly.

Input lag

9.9/10

9.6/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
18 ms
1080p120
6 ms
9 ms
2160p60
14 ms
17 ms
2160p120
6 ms
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
17 ms
2160p120
6 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
35 ms
2160p120 DV
6 ms
9 ms

There's really nothing to complain about here. The QNED86A6A achieves excellent results – around 5 ms for 120 Hz content and about 15 ms for 60 Hz. These are values that will easily satisfy both console gamers and those who connect a PC to the TV. The response to movements is instantaneous, so you can forget about delays between the image and the action on the controller.

Input lag on the Philips MLED920 is really very good – in 120 Hz mode, we measured values below 10 ms, placing this model among the absolute leaders of LCD televisions in terms of responsiveness. Even at 60 Hz, a result of around 18 ms is fully acceptable and won’t hinder any type of gameplay. A certain exception is the Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, where the lag can increase to even 35 ms. This result might be slightly noticeable for esports players, but we must honestly admit – for the majority of so-called “casual gamers,” it will be absolutely unnoticeable. Especially since we’re talking about values that still allow for comfortable gaming without major compromises.

Compatibility with PC

8/10

4/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
6ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The LG QNED86A, thanks to its IPS matrix, full RGB subpixel layout, and correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, makes fonts look stunning. Text is sharp, clear, and legible, making this TV great for office work. This is important because this year the model is also debuting in a 43" size, and such a variant can comfortably land on a desk and serve as a large monitor. Of course, some users who opt for the 43" will be gamers, and there are also no complaints here. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, so gameplay is smooth and enjoyable. It’s a bit of a shame that there's no higher refresh rate mode like the 144Hz declared by the manufacturer, as PC gamers would surely appreciate that. Nevertheless, the QNED86A6A performs really well as a monitor for gaming and work.

When it comes to working with a PC, the Philips MLED920 evokes rather mixed feelings. On one hand, it looks impressive on paper – we have 144 Hz, support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so in terms of gaming on a PC, the television does not disappoint. Anyone looking for a large screen for computer gaming gets a solid package of features here. However, when we try to use it as a typical monitor for daily work, its limitations quickly become apparent. The fonts do not look their best – there is noticeable strong dithering, colorful letters can be jagged, and with very dark text, strange anomalies appear, as if the panel loses thin lines and has trouble accurately reproducing them. In short: Yes for PC gaming. For any work and reading text: a firm no.

Viewing angles

6.9/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
61%
68%

QNED86A6A performs very well in this regard. The IPS panel used here ensures that the image retains its brightness and color saturation even when viewed at an angle. There is no fading effect that often appears in cheaper TVs with VA panels. Of course, there is no comparison to the level offered by organic panels, where colors and contrast hold up perfectly at almost any angle. But for an LCD TV, it is definitely one of the better results and is easily sufficient for watching movies or sports together on the couch with a larger group.

The viewing angles on the MLED920 are classic for VA matrix technology – even a slight shift from the center causes the colors to begin to fade, the contrast weakens, and the overall picture becomes quite flat and unattractive. There are no miracles here. So if you’re watching movies with a larger group and everyone is sitting a bit off to the side, this will be slightly noticeable. On the other hand, you gain something for this: thanks to this matrix, the MLED920 can display a much deeper black than televisions with IPS panels.

Daytime performance

5.8/10

5.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips MLED920 / MLED910: 421 cd/m2

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A: 462 cd/m2

QNED86A6A is not a brightness master, but it manages just fine. Thanks to the moderately high brightness of the panel and quite decent glare reduction, the television performs well in typical, moderately lit living rooms. The image remains clear, and colors do not lose their intensity in daylight. However, let’s not kid ourselves; this is not a screen that will handle extremely bright conditions, where sunlight pours in through huge windows and floods the room.

The Philips MLED920 performs fairly well in everyday use. The satin coating on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and in most moderately sunny living rooms, it manages unwanted glare. However, it is important to remember that this is not a television that impresses with brightness – the average value in SDR hovers around 450 nits. In very bright rooms, especially with large south-facing windows, the screen may not always overcome intense daylight. In such situations, it's worth supporting it with at least light curtains so that viewing comfort doesn't suffer significantly.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
TPN258E_V058.002.179.041
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV Panel details
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV Panel details
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV Panel details
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV Panel details

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

TV features

8.4/10

5.5/10

  • System
    WebOS
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, WiSA
    Bluetooth, WiSA

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features: webOS

QNED86A6A runs on the well-known webOS – a system that has been a strong point of LG TVs for years. Everything operates quickly and stably, and apps launch without significant delays, though the interface can be somewhat overwhelmed by advertisements at times. Fortunately, the convenience is more noticeable in daily use than the shortcomings. A significant advantage is the Magic Remote, which allows you to control the cursor like a mouse – it's one of those features that you can easily get used to and later find hard to give up. The new version of the remote is slimmer as it has been stripped of the numeric keypad. Some will appreciate the simplicity, while others will miss the classic set of buttons; it's more a matter of habit.

Classic Features

Onboard, there are also a few solutions that are not always obvious in 2025. There is the ability to record programs from built-in DVB-T2 tuners onto USB, so you can calmly return to a match or series at any moment. In the evening, Bluetooth headphone support will come in handy – especially if someone in the house falls asleep faster than we do. Additionally, there is a full set of HDMI 2.1 ports with eARC support and audio formats like Dolby Digital and Dolby Atmos.

Smart TV – Titan OS

Philips MLED920 uses the proprietary Titan OS, which is just beginning its journey in the TV market, and unfortunately, this is evident at every turn. On one hand, we have basic features – such as support for AirPlay or the ability to mirror the screen from a smartphone, but on the other hand, its limitations quickly become apparent. Screen mirroring works only with a phone, but not with a laptop. Voice search? Yes, but it is only supported by Amazon Alexa and in languages supported by this assistant. The system runs fairly quickly, but every now and then it can "fail" and gives the impression of something unfinished, still developing.

Classic TV Functions

Titan OS does not pamper in terms of classic TV functions either. Besides the hybrid remote with a numeric keypad – which, although illuminated and cleverly designed in two modes, unfortunately works via infrared – we won't find anything that could truly distinguish the MLED920 from the competition. There is no USB recording or PiP function, and such solutions could be useful in this class. From unusual additions, we have an analog output in the form of a jack, which allows connecting headphones or older speakers. It’s a small nod to users who still use older equipment.

Ambilight TV

What definitely diverts attention from the shortcomings of Titan OS is the unique, three-sided Ambilight system. Here, Philips still plays in its own league and can amaze those who have not encountered this addition. The colorful lighting that responds to screen content gives screenings a unique atmosphere and is something that the competition does not offer in a similar form. It is Ambilight that is meant to ensure that other issues – both system and functional – take a back seat.

Apps

9.1/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.9/10

8.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the QNED86A6A performs quite well with the most popular audio and video formats. During testing, we had no trouble playing MP4, MKV, or MP3 files; everything played smoothly without glitches. The TV also handled most images, although here we encountered a typical barrier for many manufacturers – the lack of full support for the HEIC format from Apple. So, if you regularly use an iPhone and store photos in this standard, you'll need to convert them beforehand or, preferably, transfer them using AirPlay. Other than that, it's hard to find fault as the built-in solution is really decent.

The built-in player in the Philips MLED920 works quite well and handles most popular audio and video files without major issues – exactly as you can see in our test table. There is no need to worry about typical movie or music formats. We can only nitpick about the somewhat selective support for photo formats and certain resolutions.

Sound

6/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

In terms of sound, the QNED86A6A performs quite decently, but let's not hide it – this is not the level that will impress home cinema enthusiasts. The sound is clean and clear, dialogues are easily heard, but overall it sounds rather flat and there is definitely a lack of solid bass. For everyday watching of television, streaming services, or news, this is an acceptable level; however, if you plan to watch movies or play games more often, even a basic soundbar will make a significant difference.

The sound in the Philips MLED920 is probably not going to be the element that impresses you the most. It sounds rather flat, lacking depth and clearer bass, which means that movies or concerts don’t have the extra layer of immersion that a better audio system can provide. However, it must be noted that the volume is really decent – the TV can reach up to 88 decibels. A big plus of the MLED920 is not so much the sound quality itself, but the support for audio formats. Philips has ensured compatibility with nearly all the major standards, including Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Dolby TrueHD 7.1. As a result, if someone decides to connect an external soundbar or receiver, they will encounter no limitations and will be able to enjoy the fullness of cinematic sound.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC