LG QNED80A6A (IPS) vs SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

Direct comparison

BRAVIA 3 II / XR35M2

Available screen sizes: 43”65”86”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”100”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.9

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    6.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.6

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.5

    6.7

  • Gaming on console

    6.8

    8.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.0

    7.2

  • Watching in bright light

    4.7

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    6.8

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    6.8

Advantages

  • Wide viewing angles – the image looks just as good from any spot on the couch

  • Rich and vibrant colors thanks to the PFS filter (QNED)

  • Smooth and modern WebOS 25 system

  • Magic remote (with cursor)

  • Good detail reproduction in HDR

  • Effective upscaling and tone transition smoothing function

  • Low input lag

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG), despite the 60Hz panel

  • Smooth tone transitions – no visible "banding" in color gradients

  • Very good motion clarity and exceptionally low motion blur for a 120Hz LCD TV

  • 4 × HDMI 2.1 48 Gbps, finally!

  • Lots of gaming features: VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Wide color gamut, QLED (PFS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • Google TV with a wide range of apps and features

  • Broad audio format support: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Record programs to USB

  • Two remotes included

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor contrast and grayish black – the IPS panel does not perform well in low light

  • Problematic local dimming – vertical backlight bands are highly visible on a dark background

  • 60Hz panel

  • No Dolby Vision support

  • Sound lacking depth – a soundbar is recommended

  • High price relative to its capabilities; for only a little more you can buy the much better BRAVIA 5

  • No local dimming

  • Lacks proper HGiG support

  • Average processing of lower-quality content

Our verdict

The QNED80A variant based on IPS technology targets a completely different audience. If you are looking for a television for a space where life buzzes all day, and family members watch TV from different spots, this will be a good choice. Wide viewing angles and saturated colors ensure that the picture looks good regardless of whether we are sitting directly in front or at the dining table. Of course, it is not perfect equipment, as there simply aren't any in this price range. The IPS panel won't provide you with jet black, so evening horror movie sessions may appear slightly gray, and edge dimming in dark scenes can create visible light stripes. Despite these shortcomings, the QNED80A makes up for it with an overall good picture quality. The processor's performance deserves immense praise – both scaling regular TV to 4K and presenting details in HDR content are outstanding here. The picture is clean, sharp, and rich in detail, even if the screen itself doesn't break brightness records. Combined with the superb WebOS system, which operates quickly and stably, this is a very safe, solid choice for everyday family entertainment at a relatively low price.

The Sony Bravia 3 II is a TV that quickly reveals what the manufacturer had in mind for this model. It's meant above all to be a sensible Bravia for gaming, and in that respect the changes are substantial. After all, Sony fixed one of the biggest complaints about its TVs: having only two full HDMI 2.1 ports. Here there are four, and that alone makes the Bravia 3 II a much more convenient choice for anyone who wants to hook up a lot of gaming gear. Fortunately it doesn't stop at gaming. The 120 Hz panel performs very well in terms of motion, motion blur is minimal, and the motion-enhancing systems work surprisingly effectively, sometimes even better than on Sony's top TVs. That's why sports are another use where the Bravia 3 II feels right at home. Add Google TV with its full suite of apps and features, and in terms of everyday use it's the Sony we've known for years.

The biggest problem with this model, however, isn't the TV itself but its current price. The Bravia 3 II is today priced dangerously close to the Bravia 5, and when the premium for the higher model is only a few percent, choosing the lower series starts to lose its point. The Bravia 5 already offers full Mini-LED backlighting with local dimming, exactly what the Bravia 3 II most lacks for evening viewing and in HDR. That's why we look at this model through the lens of price. The Bravia 3 II is a genuinely successful lower midrange TV and, at the right price, could easily be one of the more interesting choices for a gamer or sports fan. However, if the gap to the Bravia 5 remains small, it will be hard to recommend it with full conviction.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Two remote controls, Stand

Contrast and black detail

2.7/10

5.6/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,400:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,450:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,200:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,150:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,400:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

If you come across a model equipped with an IPS panel, the situation changes drastically and we won't beat around the bush – the contrast is simply weak. This is a natural feature of this technology, which pales in comparison to VA panels. Black, especially during evening screenings in the dark, is rarely jet black – more often, it leans towards shades of dark gray or navy blue. However, the real problem with this variant is the way the local dimming system operates. Since we are dealing with edge-lit backlighting on a panel that naturally "lets" through more light, this system often does more harm than good. When a bright object appears on a dark background, the TV tries to illuminate it by activating the appropriate zone. The effect? Instead of pinpoint light, we see illuminated vertical bands stretching across the entire screen. Unfortunately, this looks worse than in the VA version. Due to the lower native contrast of the panel, these "light bands" (so-called blooming) are much more visible and stand out more from the background. In many cases, these jumps in brightness are so aggressive that instead of enjoying the show, we focus on the backlighting work.

The Bravia 3 II uses a VA panel, a solution that by design provides much better contrast than IPS or ADS panels. In our unit the native contrast was about 5000:1, which is a pretty good result for a TV without local dimming. In practice this means that in a mildly lit room blacks can look really decent. Dark parts of the image don't immediately turn gray, and night scenes have noticeably more depth than on many IPS-panel TVs. However, the poorer black performance becomes apparent when you turn off the lights. The Bravia 3 II doesn't have local dimming, so the entire backlight behaves similarly regardless of what's happening in any particular area of the image. In a dark room it's easy to see that black is no longer truly black but starts to shift toward a dark navy. It's not at a level that seriously ruins the movie experience, but during an evening viewing the difference versus a Mini-LED, and even more so versus an OLED TV, becomes very clear.

HDR effect quality

4.8/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.3%, Bt.2020: 66.5%
DCI P3: 94.2%, Bt.2020: 73.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

369 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

325 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

434 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

342 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

318 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

408 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

430 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

457 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

455 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

When it comes to image dynamics and brightness, the QNED80A has its feet firmly on the ground. It is not a "light beast" – during our measurements, peak brightness oscillated around 350-400 nits. To put it plainly: these are values that will not allow HDR formats to fully spread their wings. So don’t expect the glare of the sun or car headlights in movies to blind you. However, this TV has a powerful ace up its sleeve that saves the overall view of the image – it is the colors. LG engineers have implemented an advanced filtration system here (technically likely based on a PFS phosphor, marketed as QNED/NanoCell), which does a fantastic job. Thanks to it, despite the average brightness, the screen can generate exceptionally saturated and pure colors. Our instruments showed coverage of the wide DCI-P3 cinema palette at the level of 93-94%. This result outclasses most standard LCD TVs. In practice, this means that when watching 4K HDR content, the image – while not particularly bright – is very plastic, vibrant, and pleases the eye with the depth of colors.

Bravia 3 II is certainly not a TV that tries to impress with brightness. In our measurements it reached about 450 nits, so it's far from the strongest designs on the market. That said, HDR here is not just a paper feature. Compared with regular SDR material, the brightest parts of the image can already punch through, and reflections, highlights, or stronger exposures have a bit more energy and stand out better from the rest of the scene. You can see this best in simpler shots where many bright elements appear on screen. Then the Bravia 3 II can give a hint of a higher-dynamic-range picture. The problem only starts with more demanding content, where much greater brightness headroom is needed. There the TV quickly shows its limits and instead of strong, striking HDR we get only a correctly rendered picture.

Colors

Bravia 3 II uses a QLED-type panel, although technically it does not use a traditional quantum-dot layer. Instead Sony applied a PFS phosphor-based solution that serves a very similar role: it allows for more saturated reds and greens and thus lets the TV display a much wider color gamut. Measurements showed about 94% coverage of the DCI-P3 gamut and about 74.4% of the very wide BT.2020. Those are good results for this class of hardware, meaning the Bravia 3 II has no problem showing adequately saturated colors in HDR content. Colors don't look washed out, and the more intense shades can look really attractive.

Factory color reproduction

4.4/10

6.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Here, regardless of whether you encounter the VA or IPS version, the situation looks identical. LG engineers once again served us their vision of a "gaming look," which unfortunately has little to do with accuracy. After switching to console, the white balance automatically drifts into very cold areas. The image is dominated by the color blue, making it seem artificially sharpened, and the white is so aggressive that it is almost burned out. This creates an effect that we associate with bright retail modes – everything is supposed to shine and scream "I am digital." While some may like this, we must say it straight: this is not an accurate image. If you care about naturalness, we suggest checking the settings right away and changing the color temperature to a warmer one.

In Professional mode the Bravia 3 II, straight out of the box, delivers a fairly good level of color reproduction. In SDR the most noticeable issue is a slightly low gamma, which makes the midtone areas a bit brighter. White balance is not perfect either; as brightness increases there is a slight lack of blue and red, so whites can sometimes take on a slightly warmer, mildly greenish tint. However, these are not errors that immediately stand out while watching a movie. Average error values hover around 3, so the factory preset can be considered quite good. The situation is similar in HDR. Here again there is a slight deficiency in the blue component, so the image is a touch warmer than the reference, but the difference is not large enough to be significantly distracting during normal viewing.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.4/10

8/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After professional calibration, the QNED80A in the IPS version has changed beyond recognition, especially in "regular" content (SDR). We managed to eliminate the greenish tint and calm down the overly bright gamma. In classic television or older games, color errors (DeltaE) fell below the threshold of perceptibility (value < 2). The image is now consistent, natural, and truly pleasing to the eye. The situation is somewhat more complicated in HDR mode. Although the colors are already in place, the television has trouble perfectly controlling the brightness (EOTF curve). Due to the limitations of edge lighting and the rather poor adjustment options provided by LG in this area, the television's software sometimes "does what it wants" just to mask the imperfections of black and contrast. However, this is not a cause for concern – despite these technical limitations, the image after calibration is a class better than what you saw out of the box.

After calibration you can get a lot out of SDR content. The white balance was set almost perfectly, gamma practically matches the reference value, and average color errors fell from around 3 to about 1. That's a level at which differences from the reference image are, in practice, very hard to detect. The Bravia 3 II therefore shows that despite its position in Sony's lineup it has quite a lot of potential for precise picture tuning. Improvements are also visible in HDR, although here you can no longer work around all of the TV's limitations. After equalizing the colors it's easier to notice that the EOTF curve in film material runs slightly below the reference value in places, meaning the Bravia 3 II slightly darkens part of the image. That's not ideal from a reference standpoint, but in this particular TV it also has an advantage. With no local dimming and average black levels, this behavior slightly reduces the visibility of the backlight in darker scenes and helps maintain a greater sense of contrast. So you could say Sony partially masks the limits of the panel that way, rather than trying at all costs to stick to the reference luminance.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.2/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Another very strong point of this model is the way it handles tonal transitions. Often in cheaper LCD constructions, we see what's called banding – a situation where the television cannot smoothly display a gradient, creating visible "steps" between shades. In the case of the QNED80A, the engineers have done their homework. Whether we are watching a blue sky, fog, or dark scenes full of gray, the transitions between colors are incredibly smooth and soft. There are no artificial cuts or jagged color edges. As a result, the image is very cohesive and natural, which is not a standard in this price segment.

In terms of tonal transition smoothness, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. In most of the scenes we watched, it was hard to spot any issues with blending individual shades. Gradients remain smooth both in bright parts of the image, like skies or sunsets, and in much more challenging dark shots. The only thing that may be noticeable in our photos, especially in the darkest scenes, is uneven backlighting. This is not related to color banding, but rather a consequence of using a backlight without local dimming.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

6/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

It often happens that cheap 4K TVs mercilessly expose the flaws of low-resolution materials. Here, it's different. The QNED80A is great equipment for watching content that isn't perfect. The processor does a great job of upscaling the image, making even older recordings look quite decent on a 4K screen – they are consistent and free of digital noise. An interesting feature is the gradation reduction available in the settings. It is quite effective in combating so-called banding (color banding) in low-bitrate materials. Of course, one should approach it with some caution. Due to the lower computing power of the chip (compared to the premium series), enabling this option can sometimes result in unwanted artifacts or blurriness. Despite this risk, we encourage experimentation, as in many cases this feature can save a poor-quality viewing experience.

The Bravia 3 II is Sony’s first TV to use the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, and you can see a few changes in image processing. Starting with the basics: upscaling is solid. The TV can sensibly upscale lower-resolution material and doesn’t have a strong tendency to overemphasize jagged edges or other source imperfections. With regular broadcast TV or lower-quality streaming the picture remains quite pleasing. We have more reservations about the digital image processing. In this model Sony replaced the well-known "Smooth Gradation" feature with a new setting called "Digital Noise Reduction." Its role is essentially the same: to smooth unpleasant tonal transitions and artifacts caused by heavy compression. Unfortunately, this feature performs noticeably worse than before. At the "Large" setting — the only one that noticeably affected the picture — the TV can smooth away too many image elements at once, causing film grain to disappear and surface textures or even character skin to start looking unnatural. Worse, the effect is not very consistent. When a scene contains more motion the function’s effect weakens significantly and at times it looks as if the TV stops intervening in the image altogether. For everyday viewing we therefore don’t recommend using it at a high level. It can help on a static shot, but the price is often too much loss of detail.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.6/10

8.2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
25%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

In terms of motion reproduction, the QNED80A unfortunately has a tough time. The television is based on a 60Hz refresh rate panel, which in 2025 in the QNED series is quite a disappointment. If you are looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic soccer matches, you might feel a bit unsatisfied. A solution in this situation is the TruMotion system. It allows for artificially adding frames, which smooths out the image in movies and series. In the menu, you will find the De-Judder slider – we recommend setting it to a value of 2, 3, or 4. This is the "golden mean" that improves fluidity without turning the film into a soap opera.

Motion handling is definitely one of the Bravia 3 II's strongest points. The TV uses a 120 Hz VA panel, a solution that by nature, despite the high refresh rate, doesn't always cope well with motion blur. Here Sony has managed to get that problem very well under control. Fast-moving objects remain sharp, and the characteristic trails and blurring are reduced to a very low level, if not to zero. It's one of the least smearing LCD TVs we've had the chance to test. Interestingly, in this respect the Bravia 3 II can even outperform the much more expensive flagship True RGB series: the Bravia 9 II.

Console compatibility and gaming features

6/10

8.1/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In the gaming section, we won't sugarcoat it for you – the QNED80A is not e-sports equipment. The lack of support for 120Hz signal is a fact that must be accepted. However, LG engineers have done everything to squeeze the maximum potential out of this 60 Hz panel, providing gamers with a set of desired features. First and foremost, the television supports VRR (in the range of 48-60Hz) and ALLM. This means that the image is smooth, does not stutter, and the television automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as we pick up the controller. Accessing these options is incredibly simple thanks to the dedicated system overlay – Game Dashboard. It is also worth appreciating the support for the HGiG format. This is a nod to owners of modern consoles. Although the screen does not support gaming Dolby Vision, HGiG ensures that the television "understands" how to display games in HDR. This helps us avoid the issue of blown-out clouds, which is unfortunately a plague on cheaper LCD televisions.

Sony Bravia 3 II is a very good TV for gamers, although not everything has been handled the way we'd like. The biggest change concerns the connections. For the first time in a Sony TV we get four full HDMI 2.1 ports with 48 Gb/s bandwidth, thanks to the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset. That removes one of the long-standing issues that has plagued the manufacturer's TVs. You can connect several devices at once and use each input's full capabilities, including VRR and ALLM. There's also a simple Game Bar that lets you check key signal parameters and change a few useful settings, such as black level, when you want to improve visibility in darker parts of a game.

There are, however, two limitations worth knowing. The first is the lack of support for 1440p at 120 Hz. This won't be a problem for everyone, but people using that resolution on a console or PC, for example to get higher frame rates in certain games, will have to choose 1080p. We have more reservations about HGiG support. Sony does not allow disabling tone mapping on the Bravia 3 II, so the TV continuously processes HDR content even when you would prefer to leave that task to the console. You can most easily notice this during HDR setup. The checkerboard pattern does not disappear at the point corresponding to the TV's actual capabilities. That doesn't mean HDR in games will look bad. You just need to approach the setup a bit differently and, instead of relying on the pattern, manually set the peak brightness to about 450 nits. The issue can be worked around, but you should know about it before you start configuring your console.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
15 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
15 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
14 ms
2160p120 DV
8 ms

What about responsiveness? Our measurements showed an input lag of about 15 ms. In the gaming world, where top monitors go down to 1 ms, this might seem like an average result, but in the category of living room TVs, it is a very good result. In practice, this means that when playing on a console, you will not feel any discomfort. There's no situation here where the character reacts with a noticeable delay after pressing a button on the controller. The TV responds to the controller without delay, allowing you to enjoy the gameplay without unnecessary irritation. For recreational gaming after work – the result is quite acceptable.

In terms of input lag, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. With a 120 Hz signal the input lag is around 8 ms, while at 60 Hz it increases to about 14 ms, so in both cases the response to controls is very fast and during normal gaming you'd be hard-pressed to notice any delay. It's also a plus that the TV behaves well in Dolby Vision Gaming mode on Xbox. The input lag then remains practically just as low, and until recently Sony often had a noticeable problem with this.

Compatibility with PC

5/10

7.2/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
15ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In terms of cooperation with a PC, we have another surprise in store. Theoretically, it is IPS matrices that, due to their pixel structure, should dominate in displaying static office content. Meanwhile, the QNED80A breaks the mold once again. During testing, we noticed strange behavior when displaying text. While classic, bold fonts are readable and look correct, the trouble begins with small, thin letters. They tend to "split" along the contours and cast a strange shadow. This causes fine text to become less clear, and prolonged reading can be tiring for the eyes. So, if you are looking for a TV that will mainly serve to display Excel tables or Word documents, this particular variant may disappoint you a bit.

Using it with a computer is generally good, although again not without a few reservations. The Bravia 3 II correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so in typical use text and the system UI look sharp and readable. However, gray fonts can draw attention, as their vertical edges are often noticeably brighter than the horizontal ones. On a larger screen that isn't particularly bothersome, but if you're considering the smaller Bravia 3 II as a monitor for working with text, it's worth keeping in mind. What bothers us more is the lack of additional higher-refresh-rate modes. It's not even about 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, but at least the option to get smoother motion at Full HD. This solution is appearing increasingly in competing TVs (DLG 240Hz), while Sony still doesn't offer it, even in its pricier models. For most users, 4K at 120 Hz will of course be perfectly adequate, especially for consoles, but people who also use the TV as a PC gaming monitor may be left wanting.

Viewing angles

6/10

3.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
69%
72%

Do you remember how we complained about the weaker contrast? Now it's time for a comeback. It is in terms of viewing angles that the IPS matrix shows its superiority and reason for existence. If you have a spacious living room and family members watch television from different spots – for example, from an armchair in the corner or over the dining table – this variant will be a home run. Unlike VA panels, here the image retains its properties even at a large angle. Colors remain vibrant and do not change hues when viewed from the side. This makes the QNED80A in this version a great choice for watching games with friends or cartoons with kids, where not everyone has the luxury of sitting perfectly in front of the screen.

The viewing angles are pretty typical for a VA panel — in other words, just average and for some probably even poor. The Bravia 3 II looks best when you’re sitting directly in front of the screen. As you move to the side, colors start to lose saturation and blacks become increasingly gray. Unfortunately, that’s the price you pay for this panel’s high native contrast. Watching with two or three people shouldn’t be much of an issue, but if the couch is wide, people sitting at its far edges will see a noticeably worse picture.

Daytime performance

4.7/10

5.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2): 447 cd/m2

LG QNED80A6A (IPS): 310 cd/m2

QNED80A is not a "light monster," so in full, direct sunlight, the image may appear a bit washed out. It is not equipment dedicated to combating sharp sunlight hitting directly on the screen. However, it has an ace up its sleeve that significantly improves user comfort: the panel coating. Instead of a cheap, glossy finish, LG has used a satin texture here. It works very effectively, "softening" reflections from the surroundings. So we don't see our perfect reflection in the screen like in a mirror, which can be incredibly irritating in darker scenes. So it might be insufficient for extremely bright rooms, but in standard, moderate home conditions, the QNED80A will perform perfectly.

During the day the Bravia 3 II performs quite decently, although a lot depends on where you place the TV. The satin coating handles reflections reasonably well; it doesn't act like a mirror, but strong light sources, especially a window opposite the screen, can interfere with viewing. The VA panel is an advantage here, helping blacks retain fairly good depth in daylight so the image doesn't immediately turn gray or become washed out. The set can also reach about 450 nits of brightness and can maintain that level regardless of how many bright elements are on screen. That will be more than enough for a typical living room, and during the day the picture remains easy to see. If, however, the TV is to be placed in a very bright room with large windows and a lot of direct light, you can find models with a noticeably more effective coating and greater brightness headroom.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
33.21.62
6140200730
Image processor
PENTONIC 800 4GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV Panel details
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV Panel details
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV Panel details
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV Panel details

LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

TV features

6.8/10

7.9/10

  • System
    WebOS
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

WebOS Platform and Support

One of the biggest advantages of the QNED80A model is its "brain," meaning the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS for the year 2025, which in terms of smoothness and usability is on par with more expensive models. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure. All this is thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer function (cursor), which underwent a visual overhaul this year. The manufacturer opted for minimalism—the new "Magic" is significantly smaller and more ergonomic. It fits perfectly in hand, but this change also has a downside. The physical number pad has disappeared from the casing. For the younger generations, who are accustomed to streaming, this is not an issue, but older family members who are used to entering channel numbers from memory will have to change their habits.

Everyday Use and Add-ons

In terms of functions that we would call "classic," the QNED80A sticks to a proven standard. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic features, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television craftsmanship. The operation of classic television, including Teletext, is correct and problem-free. Wireless communication also deserves praise—the Bluetooth module works reliably, allowing for quick connections to a game console controller or wireless speakers. This is a TV that simply "works"—steadily, predictably, and without unnecessary complications.

Smart TV Features: Google TV

The Bravia 3 II runs on Google TV and, in terms of capabilities, it’s one of the more feature-rich systems currently found in TVs. First and foremost, it offers access to a very large number of apps, so in addition to the most popular streaming platforms you’ll also find many less obvious services without much trouble. Sony also supports AirPlay and Chromecast, making it very convenient to cast content from a smartphone. Voice search also performs well, backed by Gemini, which handles commands in multiple languages and can genuinely make using the TV easier. However, during our tests we ran into one problem: the Bravia 3 II would not correctly receive a picture from a Windows 11 PC via Miracast. So if you want to use the TV as a secondary display for a computer, the safest solution is still a connection via HDMI.

Classic TV features

Sony also hasn’t forgotten users who still primarily use regular broadcast TV. The Bravia 3 II supports recording programs to USB, including the ability to schedule recordings via PVR, which is rare these days, especially in cheaper models. There is also teletext and a clear channel guide, so in terms of basic TV functions we really lacked nothing here, perhaps except for picture-in-picture (PiP). It’s notable that the set includes two remote controls. The first is modern and simplified (the non-backlit version), while the second is a classic design with a full numeric keypad. And although it may look a bit old-fashioned, viewers who watch a lot of traditional TV may actually find it more convenient, for example when entering channel numbers.

Apps

9.1/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Many of us still enjoy watching movies or photos from our own USB drives. Here, the QNED80A performs quite decently, supporting a wide range of video and audio codecs. Most movie libraries will start "right off the bat." However, it is important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are stuck with what the manufacturer has prepared for us – there is no option to install alternative players (e.g., the popular VLC) if we encounter a read error. What kind of errors might we encounter? First and foremost, the lack of support for HEIC files. So, if you take pictures with your iPhone and want to display them on a large screen straight from the flash drive – the TV won't see them. It's worth changing the photo save format on your phone to JPG right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulties processing very large graphic files. Photos with resolutions around 20-28 Mpix might not load or could cause errors. Aside from these exceptions – the playback is trouble-free.

The Bravia 3 II's built-in player works really well, and during our tests it handled most popular video and audio formats without any problems. There’s really nothing that would force us to install an extra player or use an external device. The only exception might be videos with subtitles saved in .txt format, which the TV does not support, but let’s be honest, at that point that would be nitpicking.

Sound

6/10

6.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

When it comes to sound, the QNED80A fits into the market standard for the mid-range. Here we have a classic 2.0 setup with a power of 20 watts. We won't hide it – you can't fool physics. The sound lacks low tones (bass) and that specific depth that builds the atmosphere in action movies or while listening to music. However, the TV has one significant advantage that users of traditional television, such as series and news programs, will appreciate. It's the reproduction of speech. Dialogues are surprisingly clear and natural. The sound is not "bass-heavy" or artificially boosted, which prevents ear fatigue and allows understanding every word of the narrator without the need to increase the volume.

In terms of sound, the Bravia 3 II performs adequately, but there’s not much more to say. The speakers handle dialogue and regular TV well, but they clearly lack lower frequencies. Bass drops off quickly, so with music, action movies, or games the sound is fairly light and lacks punch. That’s not unusual for TVs in this class, but if you want a more impactful sound a soundbar is highly recommended. Supported audio formats are much better. The Bravia 3 II handles practically everything you might need, including Dolby TrueHD, DTS-HD Master Audio, and DTS:X, formats increasingly skipped by other manufacturers. The TV can also pass them through to an external audio setup. The exception is Dolby Atmos encoded in Dolby TrueHD, which the built-in speakers cannot reproduce directly, but when using a suitable soundbar or AV receiver this shouldn’t be a significant problem.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy