LG OLED C4 vs Samsung Q7F

Direct compare

Check the best price offer:

LG OLED C4
$896

Check the best price offer:

Samsung Q7F
$377

C45 / C41

Info

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”83”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.2

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.2

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    5.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.6

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    9.3

    6.3

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    5.7

    3.9

  • Utility functions

    8.9

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.1

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    7.5

    5.8

Advantages

  • High efficiency in HDR materials

  • Very good color representation after calibration

  • Image fidelity with directorial vision

  • Excellent compatibility with consoles and PCs - low input lag, a multitude of conveniences

  • Advanced motion smoothing system

  • Solid native contrast (VA Panel)

  • Vivid colors thanks to the QLED filter

  • Low input lag (around 10MS)

  • Advanced and smooth Tizen operating system

  • Small sleek pilot with Type-C charging

Disadvantages

No like
  • Sometimes visible tonal transitions

  • Very low brightness (only 250 nits in HDR)

  • Lack of many features for gamers, including VRR and HGiG – the manufacturer promised something, but ultimately these features are simply not there

  • Lack of many classic "TV" features, e.g., USB recording or PIP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Average quality of digital image processing

Our verdict

The LG C4 stands out in its price range, likely offering little competition for many users. With its versatile features, it is perfect for movie and series enthusiasts, as well as gamers. The advanced WebOS system, paired with a remote that functions like a mouse, ensures an excellent user experience, making it a compelling choice for long-term brand loyalty. The OLED panel, built on over a decade of expertise, continues to impress with its ability to deliver a dynamic and immersive viewing experience. The brightness performance on HDR content is exceptional, with a deep and vibrant image. The dynamic tone mapping function is particularly noteworthy, making HDR10 content nearly as stunning as Dolby Vision.

Additionally, LG's televisions are well-suited for calibration, offering flexibility for home users with basic settings and professionals using 3D LUTs. For gaming enthusiasts, the LG C4 is a top choice, like most of the manufacturer’s OLED models. Thanks to HDMI 2.1 support and features like VRR, ALLM, FreeSync, and G-Sync, the gaming experience is incredibly smooth. The panel’s 144Hz refresh rate and advanced motion smoothing make it ideal for high-performance sports broadcasts. Overall, it’s hard to fault the LG OLED C4, as it offers exceptional features at a competitive price.

Samsung Q7F is the cheapest model from the manufacturer in the QLED line, and it must be admitted that several advantages can easily be pointed out. After calibration, the colors look really good, and the additional QLED filter makes the hues more saturated than in typical budget LCD TVs. In addition, there is a VA panel that offers quite decent native contrast. It is certainly not at the level of top constructions, but it does fine for everyday viewing. The biggest plus, however, is the Tizen system, which is Samsung's flagship card. It runs smoothly, is well-developed, provides access to a plethora of applications and add-ons, and at the same time allows you to easily connect the TV to the SmartThings ecosystem and control other devices in the home. And this is basically where the list of pros ends, because the longer you use the Q7F, the more it becomes clear that it is a heavily unfinished product. It is not just about the panel itself with its low brightness and mediocre picture quality in HDR films, but also about the lack of features that usually worked flawlessly in Samsung TVs. The manufacturer claims the presence of VRR and HGiG, but in practice, they are of no use, which makes it difficult to recommend the TV even to casual gamers. It also doesn't perform very well for regular television, as the digital image processing is at best average, and the tonal transition improvement feature, which usually performed excellently in Samsung TVs, here practically does not work. The Q7F is a product that can only be recommended to those looking for a TV with two phrases on the box: “QLED” and “good Smart TV”. The rest receive a rather bland product that lacks a lot to compete even with other more budget-friendly offerings. It is a shame because usually the word "QLED" in Samsung meant something more than just an ordinary TV.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Stand type
stand-type-Silver
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

4.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,850:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,300:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The LG OLED C4, as the name implies, utilises an organic matrix developed in-house, making it one of the most recognisable series on the market. With over 10 years of experience producing self-emissive panels, LG has continually refined its designs, and the 2024 models are the pinnacle of this progress. An OLED screen ensures flawless contrast and black levels, immersing viewers in the director’s vision. OLED technology stands out for its lack of traditional backlighting, instead relying on current flowing through organic pixels. This design allows for precise image control, eliminating issues like dimming of fine details or halo/blooming effects.

In our test scenes, two standout features were immediately apparent: perfect light separation and an abundance of detail in "The Revenant." Crucially, the C4 displayed the distinct green tint some televisions attempt to correct, without issues. The LG OLED C4 excels in delivering exceptional contrast, resulting in incredible depth and richness. Test results confirm that the black levels are flawless, particularly in high-contrast scenes. Ultimately, the LG C4 offers an unmatched contrast ratio, delivering a visually stunning experience whether watching movies or gaming.

The Samsung Q7F in the tested size of 55 inches has a VA panel, which immediately translates to decent native contrast. Values around 3000:1 may not be record-breaking, as we know that VA panels are currently being produced with more than double the contrast, but it still performs much better than IPS or ADS panels, where blacks quickly fade into shades of gray or navy blue. Unfortunately, we won't find typical local dimming zones here, but the manufacturer has added something resembling global dimming – meaning the whole screen darkens in relation to the content. The effect? In most scenes, blacks look quite solid, although during night screenings, we can still see that they resemble dark navy blue or gray rather than true pitch black. Overall, it's okay, but without fireworks – it's not spectacular, but it's also not a disaster.

HDR effect quality

6.8/10

3.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 75.0%
DCI P3: 92.4%, Bt.2020: 69.2%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

796 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

772 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

869 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

604 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

215 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

225 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

267 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

113 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung Q7F

HDR luminance

LG OLED C4

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

The HDR performance of the LG OLED C4 is impressive, firmly placing it in the higher tier. Most films exceed 700 nits, delivering a highly realistic image. While none surpass the 1,000-nit mark, the combination of these results with the TV’s infinite contrast and perfect blacks significantly enhances the visual experience. The final scene, with a full-screen flash of sunlight, is slightly less bright than the others but still maintains a solid level of brightness. Another highlight is the excellent DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage, which ensures incredibly vibrant colours. The HDR technology in the LG OLED C4 delivers exceptional colour and detail reproduction. The dynamic tone mapping feature optimises brightness levels, ensuring ideal light reproduction in every scene, even in the most demanding high-dynamic films.

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q7F is not one of the bright televisions, and this directly affects the quality of HDR movies. The peak brightness of the panel is only about 250 nits, which is definitely too low to speak of true cinematic experiences. In practice, the image in HDR content does not differ significantly from classic SDR, making it hard to talk about any "wow effect" that usually accompanies us while watching such films. During testing movie scenes, the image simply looked dim, and brightness almost invariably hovered around the mentioned 250 nits. The worst performance was observed in shots with small, intensely glowing elements – the applied global dimming technique reacted very aggressively, dimming the entire screen to maintain the black effect. On the plus side, it is worth noting the presence of a QLED coating that expands the color palette. As a budget QLED model, the Q7F performs quite decently here: its DCI-P3 color coverage is about 93%, and BT.2020 reaches 70%. This means that colors, despite the low brightness, can look quite vivid and attractive.

Factory color reproduction

8.1/10

5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode on the tested television was "Filmmaker," which served as the basis for all evaluations. In terms of colour reproduction, this mode performed reasonably well; however, certain flaws significantly detracted from the overall viewing experience. The most fundamental issue was the white balance, which exhibited a noticeable dominance of red, skewing the image characteristics. This resulted in a pronounced yellow tint to whites and a general shift of all colours towards warmer tones.

The gamma, an equally crucial—if not more important—aspect, was notably lowered, leading to a marked reduction in contrast. Additionally, the television frequently lost detail at the start of the gamma curve. These issues were most apparent in SDR content.

When examining HDR materials, the same yellowing effect in the white balance was observed, as seen with SDR content. However, the EOTF curve, which replaces the gamma curve for HDR, was near perfect and left little room for criticism.

The factory color reproduction in the Samsung Q7F definitely isn't one of its strong points. In Filmmaker mode, which theoretically should be closest to neutral, the white balance issue is immediately noticeable. There's too much red on the screen, while blue is noticeably lacking. The effects of this are very easy to see – white, instead of being neutral, takes on warm, almost slightly orange tones. Over time, this makes the entire image look somewhat unnatural, and bright areas of the scene can seem unrealistic. The problems become even more apparent in HDR content. The graphs show that the TV has significant errors in the Color Checker palette, which translates to visible inaccuracies in the real image. In practice, this means that colors are not presented as they should be. The Q7F also heavily manipulates brightness; darker elements are overly boosted, causing them to lose their cinematic feel, while bright parts can appear dimmed. As a result, the image seems flattened, and instead of helping to bring out details, contrast only highlights its own limitations. This is particularly frustrating in HDR materials, as every detail matters there. In scenes where a subtle play of light and shadow should be felt, the Q7F either overdoes the brightening or, conversely, suppresses elements that were meant to draw the eye. This causes the image to lose its depth, and instead of cinematic realism, we get more of a simplification effect.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.5/10

7.6/10

As mentioned, LG televisions come with advanced tools to facilitate an accurate calibration process. By utilising these tools, we meticulously adjusted the image to align with the director’s original vision. Without overstating, the results were outstanding. Both SDR and HDR content now achieve a level of visual fidelity that reflects how films are intended to be seen.

Examining the colour accuracy on the "ColourChecker" palette reveals impressive results, with almost all colour errors falling below a delta of "1," aside from two minor exceptions. Post-calibration, the LG OLED C4 demonstrated a marked improvement in colour reproduction, particularly in SDR and HDR modes. Testing the TV after calibration highlighted its capacity for delivering exceptionally accurate colours, underlining the high calibre of this model. The LG C41LA offers a stunningly precise colour palette, sure to satisfy even the most discerning viewers.

After professional calibration, we managed to bring the Q7F in order – at least in terms of SDR content. The picture in this mode looks really good: the white balance has been set correctly, the colors appear natural, and errors in the color palette have dropped to values that are practically invisible to the eye. The gamma behaves excellently, and the only minor drawback is a slight brightening of smaller elements, which results from the lack of local dimming. For everyday TV watching or standard quality films, the Q7F performs surprisingly well.

It was much more difficult to tame HDR content. Despite adjusting the white balance, the television continues to manipulate brightness significantly, causing scenes to sometimes look unnatural – what was meant to be subtly darker can end up being overly brightened, and bright parts of the image sometimes appear dull. The final effect is better than in the factory settings, but it is evident that the design limitations of the Q7F do not allow for fully utilizing the potential of HDR materials.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

9/10

The fluidity of tonal transitions in LG TVs has long been a delicate issue, as the manufacturer, despite excelling in many areas, has consistently faced challenges in this aspect. However, the tested TV performed notably well in this regard. Issues were primarily confined to darker scenes, particularly the final two, where imperfections were more apparent. Interestingly, this model delivered better results in tonal transitions than LG's flagship model, the G4, showcasing a commendable improvement in this area.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Q7F is really impressive. The gradients are smooth, without strong steps or artificial divisions that can be quite noticeable in cheaper televisions. Even in more challenging scenes, like the one from The Revenant or the red shot of the actor flowing in water, the image held its level and simply looked good. If someone examines it very closely, they might notice slight imperfections in extremely demanding moments, but they are subtle enough that most people won't even notice them. For this price range, the Q7F handles gradation surprisingly well, and it's hard to find anything serious to criticize.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

4.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Let us revisit the function responsible for smooth gradation and consider its role in improving lower-quality materials. The default smoothing of tonal transitions, while decent, can be further enhanced. The feature includes a slider for adjusting its strength, and we recommend selecting the first option. This setting strikes a balance, offering excellent results without compromising important details through unnecessary blurring.

The image scaling on the LG C4 is commendable, though not entirely without flaws. By default, the image appears slightly sharper, though not to an intrusive degree. While jagged edges on elements like trees are occasionally visible, this issue is relatively minor compared to similar offerings from other manufacturers.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Q7F is a bit of a sine wave. On one hand, we have really nice upscaling – weaker sources look better than one might expect. The image becomes clearer, sharper, and even older movies or terrestrial TV hold up well. Samsung has been strong in this area for years, and the Q7F confirms that. On the other hand… things start to get tricky. The TV has a problem with overscan – part of the image is simply cut off, and it looks rather unrefined. Additionally, we were let down by a feature called "noise reduction," which should improve the smoothness of tonal transitions in weaker materials. In other Samsungs, it works relatively well, but here it practically makes no difference – the banding in gradients remains. It's a bit disappointing because we could have expected more from a model that is aimed at users looking for a display for SDR content.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

5.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

The LG G4 supports a maximum refresh rate of 144 Hz, achievable only when connected to a high-performance PC. Otherwise, the television operates at a maximum of 120 Hz, the recommended setting for viewing sports or content with fast-paced motion. For those prioritising smooth image quality, LG has included a versatile motion smoothing feature called "TrueMotion." This function is split into two adjustable sliders: De-Blur, which sharpens moving images, and De-Judder, which reduces jitter. Both sliders offer a range of settings from 0 to 10, enabling users to fine-tune the motion smoothness to their preference.

The LG OLED C4 boasts an impressive average response time of less than 1 millisecond, as confirmed by our measurements. This results in exceptional image clarity, far surpassing LCD televisions, which often have response times of several milliseconds. This clarity is evident in tests like the "UFO Test," where no trailing blur is visible behind moving objects.

Motion blur and motion fluidity in the Q7F is probably the most budget-conscious element of this TV. The 60 Hz panel is noticeable, with blur being quite evident, especially in dynamic scenes, and it's rather difficult to consider this model as equipment designed for watching sports or playing fast-paced games. In tests with the little green man, there was a long tail, and the ball in a football match would leave trails behind it.

On the plus side, the presence of motion smoothing is commendable. It really makes a difference in movies - especially since most materials are recorded at 24 frames. Here we can decide for ourselves whether we prefer a more "cinematic" image, with the slight jerkiness characteristic of cinema, or a smoother, more "television-like" one. This actually works quite well and helps improve the viewing comfort for series or movies.

Console compatibility and gaming features

10/10

3.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    40 - 144Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The LG C4, like nearly all OLED televisions from the manufacturer, excels in its compatibility with consoles and PCs. With the inclusion of four full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports supporting 48 Gbps, the TV incorporates a range of features to enhance the gaming experience. Notably, it offers simultaneous support for FreeSync and G-Sync, making it an ideal choice for gamers using AMD or Nvidia graphics cards. For those seeking the best possible gaming quality, the integration of HDR Dolby Vision and HGIG mode is particularly impressive. HDR Dolby Vision operates with remarkably low input lag across all settings, ensuring smooth and responsive gameplay.

A standout feature in LG's televisions is the GameBar, which allows users to adjust settings in real-time without leaving the game. This includes options for customising the image for viewers with visual impairments, a thoughtful addition. Additionally, enabling VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) does not result in a loss of contrast—a benefit of the OLED panel's self-emissive technology, eliminating the need for conventional backlighting. While some slight flickering of grey tones may occur, this is a characteristic of VRR technology across all manufacturers.

In summary: The LG C4, like the brand's other OLED models equipped with high-refresh-rate panels and HDMI 2.1, provides a seamless and immersive gaming experience. For gamers demanding top-tier performance, this TV is an outstanding choice.

Features for gamers in the Samsung Q7F is a topic that evokes quite a bit of mixed emotions. On one hand – no sensible person expected miracles here, after all, it's a 60 Hz television, and it was clear from the beginning that it wouldn't be a device to extract the maximum from a console or PC. On the other hand, since the manufacturer promised specific solutions in promotional materials, it's natural that we wanted to see them in practice. At the start, it's quite decent. The automatic game mode (ALLM) works, so there's no need to manually fiddle with the settings; the console switches the TV to low latency mode by itself. Additionally, we have the Game Bar, which looks impressive and allows you to check a few basic parameters without leaving the game. And this is where the good news ends.

The biggest problem with the Q7F is VRR, or rather its absence. Indeed, a relevant icon appears in the menu, and you can even see it in the Game Bar, but throughout the entire test, the function remained dead and could not be activated in any way. The issue with HGiG is even more painful; this option was actually available at the beginning, but after a software update, it disappeared completely, which is simply unprofessional. Therefore, the Q7F is only suitable for absolute basics. Sure, you can turn on the console, play more mellow titles, and enjoy low input lag, but if someone is counting on more advanced features that the manufacturer promised, they will be disappointed. This is not a television intended for gaming, and it's better to be aware of this before purchasing.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
13 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

The latency time of the LG C4 is exceptionally low across all scenarios, making it a standout choice for even the most dedicated gamers. At demanding settings of 4K 120 Hz with HDR, the input lag is an astonishingly low 5 ms, ensuring an incredibly responsive gaming experience. Notably, this low latency remains consistent even when Dolby Vision HDR is enabled—a feature that competitors often struggle to maintain without increasing delay.

This consistency and performance firmly position the LG C4 as a top-tier option for gamers seeking high-quality visuals and minimal lag. It undoubtedly earns the highest rating and strong recommendation for gaming enthusiasts.

The input lag on the Samsung Q7F is really good for a 60 Hz display. Measurements showed values below 12 ms, which means that for regular gaming on a console, this model is more than sufficient. Of course, it doesn’t match the top-level 120 Hz screens that can go below 6–7 ms, but in everyday use, it's hard to talk about noticeable delay. In this regard, the Q7F does not lag behind the competition in its segment and can easily be considered a safe choice for casual or sports gaming. At least in this respect.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
5ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

When paired with a PC, the LG C4 delivers excellent performance, largely due to its impressively low latency of 13.5 ms, ensuring a near-instantaneous response between the mouse, eye, and screen. This makes it an ideal choice for tasks requiring precision and speed.

One of the most crucial aspects of using a TV as a monitor is text readability, and in this regard, the LG C4 excels. The text appears sharp and clear, although enabling the passthrough option in the settings is necessary to optimise font sharpness.

The RWBG pixel layout is another advantage, as it does not significantly affect the clarity of fonts or letters—a notable improvement compared to Samsung's QD-OLED panels. Whether using Windows or macOS, the LG C4 ensures a smooth and satisfying user experience for work or general PC use.

Cooperation with a PC on the Q7F is decent, although it's not a TV that will satisfy the most demanding users. The fonts are displayed clearly and sharply, so you can comfortably work on it – especially for everyday office tasks or browsing the internet. With thin letters, you can notice slight shading, but it's not something that interferes with normal use. In a smaller size, the Q7F can actually work as a computer screen, although you have to keep its limitations in mind. The lack of variable refresh rate means that we won't benefit from G-Sync or FreeSync, and 60 Hz effectively closes the door to more demanding PC gaming. For work and light use, it will be okay, but for serious gaming, it's definitely better to look for something higher up in Samsung's offering.

Viewing angles

7.5/10

3.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
25%
78%

One of the undeniable strengths of OLED panels is their exceptional performance for group viewing, allowing for consistent image quality from a range of viewing angles. The LG C4 upholds excellent contrast, colour saturation, and fidelity, ensuring a satisfying experience for viewers in different seating positions.

While it lacks the enhancements provided by MLA (Micro-Lens Array) technology, the C4 still delivers impressive results that most owners are likely to find highly satisfactory. However, at sharper angles, a slight greenish tint can sometimes be observed. This is a known characteristic of LG’s WRGB panels without micro-lens technology and, unfortunately, is an inherent limitation that cannot be mitigated.

The viewing angles on the Q7F are simply poor – typical for VA panels. Just sitting slightly to the side and it's immediately clear that the picture loses quality. Colors fade, contrast significantly drops, and blacks begin to resemble more of a gray than anything deep. This is a television that is definitely best viewed straight on, and any larger viewing angle comes with compromises.

TV efficiency during daytime

5.7/10

3.9/10

Matrix coating
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung Q7F: 237 cd/m2

LG OLED C4: 367 cd/m2

The maximum brightness of the LG C4 in SDR content reaches 367 nits, which is an impressive result for an OLED television and ensures comfortable viewing, even during the day. Two notable aspects enhance the experience. First, the glossy coating on the panel effectively contains light reflections, preventing them from spreading across the screen and disrupting the image.

Secondly, the brightness of the screen at 100% white fill measures approximately 220 nits, a significant improvement over earlier OLED models, which often struggled to achieve even half this level. This enhancement provides an excellent viewing experience, particularly for bright and vibrant content such as winter sports broadcasts.

The performance of the Q7F during the day unfortunately does not impress. Due to low brightness, the screen quickly succumbs in very sunlit rooms. Therefore, it is difficult to recommend it to those who plan to watch television in a bright living room with large windows. In moderately lit rooms, it still manages, but in bright light, the picture loses clarity. Additionally, the fact that the panel does not always effectively handle reflections means that during the day, glare can be problematic. This is more of a screen for evening viewing than for daily sessions in full sunlight.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
QLED
Software version during testing
03.11.05
T-RSLFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

LG OLED C4

Samsung Q7F

TV features

8.9/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

LG has used its well-established proprietary WebOS system, a staple in its televisions for many years. This system provides access to virtually all major applications, with only a few notable exceptions, such as CDA or KODI. Additionally, the modern web browser and the remote control with a built-in mouse make streaming services easily accessible, even when specific apps are unavailable. One of WebOS's standout features is its ability to operate using a cursor that appears when the remote control is moved, offering great convenience when entering queries or passwords.

WebOS also includes screen mirroring, AirPlay, and Bluetooth headphone connectivity. For users with hearing impairments, it’s worth noting that WebOS allows the simultaneous use of headphones and the TV speaker, providing added flexibility. For sports fans, the system has a handy alert feature that notifies users of an upcoming match, ensuring they never miss a game.

Another highlight is the home panel, which enables users to control all smart devices connected to their home network. For example, a completed washing cycle will trigger a notification in the upper right corner of the screen.

In conclusion, while WebOS may not be as widely known or feature-rich as Android TV, it offers stable, fast performance and supports the majority of functions that users need. It is a solid and reliable option for those seeking a simple, effective, and user-friendly operating system for their television.

Smart TV – Tizen system

Here Q7F shows its strongest side. Samsung has been developing the Tizen system for years, and it is evident that we are dealing with a mature, refined platform. Everything works smoothly, the menu does not lag even when switching between heavier applications, and installing additional programs from the library is quick and hassle-free. Additionally, there is full support for AirPlay, integration with voice assistants, as well as a wide range of add-ons – from collaboration with devices in the SmartThings ecosystem to the ability to control Philips Hue smart lighting or other smart gadgets. Samsung strongly focuses on advanced network features, and it shows – in terms of Smart TV, Q7F has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, and on the contrary, it can put more expensive competitor models to shame.

Classic Features

On the side of classic "TV" solutions, it is clear that the manufacturer has put everything on the smart card. We will not find USB recording or PiP mode here, features that used to be standard. It is evident that Q7F is primarily intended to be a media center, not a device for users accustomed to more traditional solutions. Fortunately, there are several practical additions – we have Bluetooth for pairing headphones or speakers and the option to change the font size in the menu, which will be appreciated by users with weaker eyesight.

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
No
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
No
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default file player on the LG C4 handles various photo resolutions without issue, making it a reliable option for viewing images. It supports nearly all popular video formats, including Dolby Vision, ensuring compatibility with high-quality content. However, the television does not support H.266 VVC codec, which is relatively rare at this stage, so this limitation is not a significant drawback.

A notable omission is the lack of support for subtitles in the .txt format, which could be inconvenient for users who prefer using text-based subtitle files. In terms of photo formats, the C4 supports only three: JPEG, PNG, and HEIC (the latter being particularly useful for Apple phone users). While this is somewhat limited, it covers the most common formats for everyday use.

The TV excels in audio file compatibility, with no issues playing a wide range of audio formats, ensuring seamless music and sound playback without any compatibility warnings.

In the Q7F, we have a built-in file player, and as is usually the case with Samsung TVs, it works quite well – most popular movies or music play without any fuss. For basic use, it’s sufficient, and there’s usually no need to reach for external solutions like connecting a laptop. It’s worse if someone wants to upload photos – it can stumble here, especially with Apple’s HEIC or PNG, which are visible in the player menu but don’t necessarily want to work.

Apps

9.1/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

7.5/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    80dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The LG C4 audio system is well-tuned, providing strong bass and balanced mid and high tones. It stands out as one of the better-sounding televisions in its price range. However, most buyers will likely already have a dedicated audio setup. The presence of DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Atmos codecs enhances the overall experience, offering high-quality sound for those who rely on the TV's built-in speakers.

The Samsung Q7F comes with a 20 W speaker system and… well, there’s no point in sugarcoating it; it’s not really impressive. The TV itself sounds quite decent, meaning we can clearly hear series, news, or daily programs, and the dialogues are not lost, but there is a lot lacking in depth and sound space. There is practically no bass; something thuds, but it resembles more of a knock on a box than true low tones. Music sounds flat, and movies also don't make any significant impression – we won’t feel like we're in a cinema. It’s a sound in the category of “acceptable,” just enough to have something built-in, but if someone is counting on stronger experiences, they will sooner or later reach for a soundbar anyway. And to be honest – even the simplest model will make a significant difference here, and Samsung has quite a few of those in their offering.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

80dBC (Max)

75dBC