LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design that we have known for years. Thanks to the nanofilter, the TV is capable of displaying better, cleaner colors than standard budget TVs, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay a very weak black level and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during nighttime viewings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not only from brands like TCL or Hisense but... at LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider color gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless wide viewing angles are your only priority, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the cost of tragic blacks and a higher expenditure) is simply too high.
Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines what we can expect from a home entertainment center in many aspects. The use of groundbreaking Tandem OLED technology means that when it comes to picture quality, we are reaching absolute heights here. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that, at times, take your breath away. Whether we are watching movies in a sunlit living room or playing games at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.
However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with some disappointment when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips strongly promoted the use of a "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, the reality turned out to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we expected a much greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool head, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It's not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" fight within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant image generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins at the starting gate in terms of audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the more expensive 950 model in favor of a different design. Thus, we encounter a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips TV" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.