LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design that we have known for years. Thanks to the nanofilter, the TV is capable of displaying better, cleaner colors than standard budget TVs, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay a very weak black level and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during nighttime viewings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not only from brands like TCL or Hisense but... at LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider color gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless wide viewing angles are your only priority, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the cost of tragic blacks and a higher expenditure) is simply too high.
LG MRGB85 is a TV that feels most at home in the hands of gamers and people attached to the webOS ecosystem. In that respect it’s hard to fault. It offers a lot of advantages for gamers thanks to a very high refresh rate panel. On top of that there’s a smooth webOS experience that stands out on the market mainly because of the convenient Magic remote and a full set of features for traditional TV. The problem starts when you look at overall picture quality and compare it to the price the manufacturer asks for this model. The MRGB85 launches at a level that, to put it mildly, is hard to call attractive compared with competing models. For similar money you can find TVs with much more sophisticated backlighting and, above all, better black-level control. The biggest controversy, however, is the naming and the way LG positions this model. MRGB85 does use a three-color backlight, but it’s placed at the edge of the screen. It’s therefore hard to call this a full-fledged RGB Mini-LED in the sense commonly used for TVs that employ a large number of independently controlled zones behind the panel. In practice the local dimming limitations are very noticeable and in dark scenes they significantly impair the viewing experience. That doesn’t mean the MRGB85 is a bad TV. It handles everyday content well, offers decent colors, good brightness and a very broad feature set. SDR material can look really good, and Dolby Vision partly helps hide weaker brightness management in HDR. Still, it’s difficult to shake the impression that the model’s biggest problem isn’t the hardware itself but its price and overly ambitious positioning in the market. If someone is mainly looking for a gaming TV, values the convenience of webOS and finds a big discount, the MRGB85 can make sense. At the current price it takes a back seat, because the competition today simply offers more in terms of picture quality.