XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs TCL C69K / Q6C

Direct comparison

C69K / Q6C / C6K

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

7.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    6.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    6.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    6.3

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    6.4

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    6.5

Advantages

  • VA matrix with good native contrast and decent blacks

  • Support for Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – a vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (approx. 94% DCI-P3)

  • Decent colours after SDR mode calibration

  • Support for popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, clear remote with a numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Very good contrast and black: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Good motion smoothness: High refresh rate of 144Hz

  • Decent panel brightness

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HDMI 2.1, HGiG

  • Additional mode for PC gamers: 240Hz

  • GoogleTV system with a wide selection of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • No real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g. Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – lack of chroma 4:4:4, strong dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky construction, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and sound switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing are practically non-existent

  • Very weak sound, virtually no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Management of backlighting could be more precise

  • Minor, occasional errors in the system

  • Slight ghosting visible in dynamic scenes

  • Great chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance does not reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it is simply a copy of last year's model with a different label. And there is some truth to that, as the main new feature, or rather the only noticeable difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. Credit must be given to Xiaomi, as this addition really does make a difference – it is not a solution for professional gamers, but a nod towards those looking for a smoother image during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple yet clever idea that distinguishes it in the “super-budget” segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, excitement quickly dwindles. Even though the year has changed on the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 have remained – the system can still experience strange stutters, and the occasional errors can be quite irritating. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing, which worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many limitations in the design that the competition at a similar price point is already attempting to mask. In terms of picture quality, we will not deceive you either. A brightness level of 200–300 nits does not stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, with simpler streaming content, one can manage to watch something, but with high-budget productions, it is immediately evident why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us almost every time. And here we get to the crux of the matter. The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really require very little. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it works quite well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games due to the 120 Hz mode, they may even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average picture quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

The TCL C69K / Q6C is a TV that perfectly targets gamers and movie fans on a reasonable budget. Its biggest strength is the combination of a VA panel with Mini-LED backlighting. Simply put, contrast is high and blacks are deep, making evening movie sessions look truly impressive. Add to that a 144 Hz refresh rate, which does wonders not only for sports but especially for gaming. And for gamers, it’s a full package: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, and even a 240 Hz option for PC. Throw in Dolby Vision, which gives movies a cinematic touch, and you get a picture that’s just pleasing to the eye. On the software side, it runs Google TV with the Gemini AI assistant, so there’s no shortage of apps. The sound system holds up well too — Dolby Atmos and DTS support are nice additions, complemented by branded Onkyo speakers. Of course, it’s not perfect. The local dimming system can sometimes struggle in complex scenes, slightly lifting black levels. And those Polish translations in the menu... let’s just say they could use some work. Still, the C69K / Q6C makes a very strong case for itself. Considering the price, it’s one of the most interesting all-around TVs for both movies and gaming. Definitely worth watching out for during sales — and hoping for TCL’s usual post-launch firmware improvements.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

113,750:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

17,350:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

16,300:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

9,850:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

4,850:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget model like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the use of a VA panel. It is responsible for quite a decent contrast, which in our measurements oscillated around 5000:1 – 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with a fairly deep black – something that is difficult to find in competitive models with an IPS panel without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added a feature for global dimming of the entire panel. It sounds good, but… we advise you to turn it off immediately. Why? Because the screen begins to behave very strangely in darker scenes – sometimes it dims so much that practically nothing is visible, while at other times it brightens so much that the already dark blue black turns into a bright blue. At that moment, we felt as if the television was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this feature, the contrast looks really solid. It is definitely not on the level of advanced televisions with local dimming, but in its price range, it will comfortably satisfy most users – especially if you are not watching in a completely dark room, but have at least a little light in the background, which effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue black".

The heart of the image in TCL C69K / Q6C is the VA panel (specifically HVA from TCL CSOT), which offers a solid native contrast of around 6000–7000:1, even before local dimming is activated. However, the true strength of this model lies in the Mini-LED backlighting with the ability to dim individual zones. In the 55-inch unit we tested, we counted around 180 of them (this value increases with the diagonal size). For this price segment, the contrast is indeed very impressive. In less complex film scenes, for example in segments from "Oblivion," it presents excellently, and shots immersed in black are very striking. Nevertheless, the characteristics of Mini-LED technology mean that we do not always avoid issues – in more demanding frames with many bright details, halo effects or excessive dimming of certain elements may occur (regardless of the selected local dimming settings). All in all, contrast is undoubtedly a strong point of the C69K / Q6C.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 92.7%, Bt.2020: 71.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

610 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

425 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

148 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C69K / Q6C

HDR luminance

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

HDR luminance

If you are hoping for a cinema-grade HDR effect in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, you better cool your expectations quickly. This television is simply too dim to fully showcase the capabilities of contemporary films or series designed for the highest image quality. Our measurements showed brightness in the range of 200–300 nits, which is more akin to SDR content than ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that while most films may look fine, they certainly won't evoke that "wow" effect that other televisions are known for. Fortunately, not everything is lost – we must credit the PFS LED filter used here, which is a solution similar to the quantum dot technology found in QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colours in the vast majority of materials.

In terms of brightness, TCL C69K / Q6C is a moderate model. In optimal film conditions, it shows its full potential, achieving a maximum of around 600 nits. In scenes with large, intense light sources, the HDR effect can be truly satisfying, providing a cinematic shimmer. However, it should be noted that when managing backlight zones, there are situations where parts of the image become dimmed, and sometimes they are barely visible. This suggests that there is still a lack of proper optimisation of the algorithms; however, considering the technical parameters in this price range, the design itself still presents very well.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

5/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode took us by surprise – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as Hollywood standard resembled more of a shop window display. The white balance was shifted towards blue, leading to significant colour mistakes and burnt-out scenes in SDR content. It was slightly better, though still not perfect, in HDR materials. There were also issues there – the colour saturation and the entire palette consistently drifted towards cooler tones, resulting in an image that had more of an artificial, cold tint instead of a cinematic character. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should showcase this television, we got an effect far from expectations.

The Filmmaker mode, which has made its debut in this year's TCL televisions (including the C69K / Q6C), is definitely the best choice "to start with." This is the mode we recommend for daily film and series viewings. Unfortunately, as is often the case, best does not mean perfect. In SDR material, the image proved to be too warm, with a pronounced red tint in the white balance. We had the opposite impression with HDR content – here the image became cooler than it should, due to an excess of blue. Additionally, there is the characteristic of brightness, which at times resulted in overexposure. In practice, this translated into quite noticeable errors in colour tests, which is difficult to accept in a mode branded as "from the creators."

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7.5/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Color reproduction after calibration
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Color reproduction after calibration

Although Xiaomi is not a brand associated with top-tier televisions, it must be acknowledged that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left plenty of calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR image gained a completely new look. Colours stopped drifting towards blue tones, whites took on a more natural quality, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was somewhat different with HDR materials. Here, it was immediately evident what we had already mentioned – clipping in bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration helped only partly, as the limitations of the panel itself played a role. However, it must be emphasized that for SDR, the television had transformed beyond recognition and in a decidedly positive direction.

Through white balance correction, we were able to significantly reduce the tendency of C69K / Q6C to distort colours, which yielded a very good final result. After calibration, the issue of excessive warming of scenes in SDR and excessive cooling of the image in HDR disappeared. However, it is worth analysing the brightness characteristics more closely. While in SDR content it is hard to have major objections – the image looks really good, especially in older films, TV programmes or on YouTube – it performs significantly worse in the case of HDR content. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests that everything is fine, yet in practice (EOTF in films) the limitations of the design itself become apparent. This model has a tendency to excessively brighten small parts of the frame, only to overly dim the entire scene in other situations. The effect of calibration is therefore undeniable, and in terms of colour reproduction, C69K / Q6C gains a lot. Unfortunately, certain limitations arising from local dimming management simply cannot be bypassed.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

9.5/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions

The television really handles colour blending well, and in most scenes, it's difficult to spot any imperfections. This is most evident in the bright segments of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect; the image is then smooth and natural. Darker scenes present slightly worse, where characteristic banding can be noticed. Fortunately, this is not a flaw that stands out prominently, and for most viewers, it will remain practically unnoticed.

In the model C69K / Q6C, tonal transitions (between colours) are very smooth, and it is difficult to notice any banding. The image appears natural, and any minor imperfections are only visible on bright test screens, and that requires very careful scrutiny. In everyday viewing, the effect is simply outstanding. It can be confidently stated that in this category, C69K / Q6C performs exceptionally well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
No

Smooth transition function

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the strengths of this model. One might expect that since the television was not designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would focus on a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower-quality images. Unfortunately – and here we are also faced with significant disappointment. On the positive side, we can note reasonably good upscaling, which handles HD materials and boosts them up to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, this is where the list of advantages ends. The television does not offer any features that improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we get a raw image, exactly as we deliver from an external source. On a large screen, such a lack of support makes lower-quality materials simply look bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older materials, it happens that part of the image gets cut off, which only amplifies the impression that Xiaomi still has a lot of ground to make up in this category.

In terms of image scaling, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. Lower quality content appears acceptable, and thanks to the lack of overscan issues, the image is displayed in full without any cropping. However, one should not expect miracles – very low-quality materials will not gain a second life here, as the image processor has its limitations.

Thin lines and details exhibit characteristic tearing, which reveals the absence of more advanced image enhancement algorithms. It is also a pity that the C69K / Q6C lacks a tone transition smoothing feature. As a result, in older films or video materials, banding of colours can be visible and may become distracting during prolonged viewing.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

7.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur ():

The fluidity of motion in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that arises from the hybrid matrix used here. At its native 4K resolution, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch films and series. It is precisely with them in mind that the manufacturer has added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – opting for greater fluidity or leaving more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

The use of a 144 Hz panel in TCL C69K / Q6C is a significant advantage in this price range. It represents an important step forward compared to its predecessor (C655 PRO), which only offered 60 Hz in 4K. The difference is particularly noticeable when watching sports or playing games – the ball, players, or dynamic action in games are displayed more clearly and without loss of detail. Another interesting feature is the panel's ability to work at 240 Hz (which the manufacturer does not officially mention) – we will return to this topic in relation to the PC gaming mode. TCL has also added a feature for movie fans: “Motion Clarity”. This allows users to adjust the picture to their preferences using two simple sliders. We can either keep the visible film frame or opt for very smooth, "

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Exactly – since Xiaomi has included the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature, one might expect that they would follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens this enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be admitted, is a great addition in a budget design), we only have a rather odd player panel. It's hard to call it a full-fledged "game bar" – it’s more of a simple overlay on the TV Menu with limited capabilities. And that would be about it. There’s a lack of ALLM, so the TV won’t automatically switch to game mode. There’s no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame sync. We also won’t find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are becoming increasingly standard on consoles. In short: besides the Game Boost 120 Hz, which actually allows for a more enjoyable experience at 1080p or 1440p, the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing that could particularly attract gamers.

TCL C69K / Q6C is a television that can confidently be described as equipment created with gamers in mind. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, VRR support, automatic game mode (ALLM), and Dolby Vision Gaming. Additionally, there is a practical Game Bar, which is a panel with the most important settings conveniently at hand – useful when we want to change something quickly during gameplay (e.g. screen aspect ratio: Yes, it can be done!). The wide range of VRR, reaching up to 240 Hz, is particularly noteworthy. However, this option is mainly for PC gamers who will operate below the native 4K resolution. In that case, the television can spread its wings and show additional smoothness, especially in fast-paced e-sports titles. For consoles, we stick to the classic limit of 120 Hz, but even so, the capabilities are truly extensive. The only downside is a slight ghosting that can occasionally be seen in dynamic scenes. Other than that, C69K / Q6C offers everything that gamers expect from a television.

Input lag

9.5/10

9.7/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
18 ms
1080p120
8 ms
10 ms
2160p60
25 ms
18 ms
2160p120
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
17 ms
2160p120
11 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

The input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and definitely not its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – in those, the television goes below 10 ms, which can easily be described as an outstanding result, and more than sufficient even for the more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – the input lag then rises to around 25 ms. While these may not be the best figures on the market, they are perfectly acceptable for casual gaming or firing up a console in the evening. Especially since in most cases, it's still worthwhile to enable the 120 Hz mode, which is the most advantageous for gamers.

In terms of input lag, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. With 120 Hz content, the delay is about 10 ms, and at times even less. This is a level at which the response is practically instantaneous and difficult to find any objections. For 60 Hz material, the result is around 18 ms – still a very good result, entirely sufficient for comfortable gaming.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
25ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Compatibility with PC
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Compatibility with PC

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no point beating around the bush – it's very bad. While the 120 Hz mode can still be used in games at lower resolutions, for daily work the television is completely unsuitable. There's a lack of full support for chroma 4:4:4, meaning fonts are blurred and sometimes even rainbow-like. Additionally, there's significant dithering, causing the image to appear uneven – some pixels shine brighter, others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially coloured and on a dark background) becomes hard to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it’s hard to talk about any comfort here. In this category, we give the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a score of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there’s really no point in dwelling on this further.

As a monitor for a computer, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. At its native resolution, we achieve 4K at 144 Hz, and by lowering the resolution, it can reach even 240 Hz. The television also works with Nvidia and AMD graphics cards, supporting both G-Sync and FreeSync. It is also difficult to find any complaints for office work. Thanks to the support for chroma 4:4:4, the fonts are sharp and legible, and any minor imperfections are so small that they remain unnoticed in everyday use.

Viewing angles

3/10

3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
78%

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 uses a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. When looking at the screen from the side, we quickly notice a loss of quality – colours noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that does not change the fact that this is clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the living room, we need to reckon with this limitation.

On the TCL C69K / Q6C, the viewing angles are typical for a VA panel. Sitting directly in front, the image looks very good, but any shift to the side results in a noticeable drop in colour saturation and brightness. The difference is particularly evident in colourful scenes – the hues become washed out, and the contrast loses its depth. Compared to IPS panels, this is clearly a weaker performance, although it is compensated by better blacks and higher native contrast.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

6.4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Daytime performance
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Daytime performance
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Daytime performance
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL C69K / Q6C: 532 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin coating that manages to dull reflections somewhat, so the colours do not lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just remember that it is not an extremely bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In a typical, moderately sunlit living room, it is sufficient, but if you have large windows and plenty of sunshine coming in, it might simply be difficult without blinds or curtains.

In bright lighting conditions, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The panel offers decent brightness (in SDR content, it reaches around 550 nits), which allows for comfortable TV viewing in an average-lit living room, and even on days when strong light comes through the windows. This means that daytime viewing does not require complete darkening of the room. Another positive aspect is that the screen coating does a fair job of suppressing reflections, so the television does not become a "mirror" even in bright light. However, it is not at the level of top models with more advanced anti-reflective coatings – in very challenging conditions (e.g., with large windows), reflections will be noticeable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
V8-T653T01-LF1V531.002396
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz
MT5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

TCL C69K / Q6C

TV features

6.1/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features

SmartTV - Google TV

The biggest advantage of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It is what gives the television a second life – you can run practically any application on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and lesser-known programmes from the Google Play Store. We are not limited to what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is the case with other budget televisions. Additionally, we have AirPlay, voice search via Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did encounter a few minor hiccups – for example, streaming from a laptop did not always want to work – but despite these shortcomings, Google TV is a huge plus in this setup.

Classic TV Functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be termed a 'senior-friendly' television. The large remote control with a numerical keypad and a considerable number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface facilitate the use of classic television functions. We will not find many advanced features such as USB recording or the PiP function, but the presence of an analogue headphone jack output can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression of a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System Stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered irritating system lags, problems with Miracast, and issues when switching audio sources. There were even instances where it was necessary to reset the television by disconnecting it from the power supply. This simply shows that although Google TV offers huge possibilities, the stability in such a budget-friendly construct can still be quite problematic.

Multimedia Features: Google TV

The Google TV system is undoubtedly the strongest user aspect of TCL C69K / Q6C. It gives the television its character and provides an advantage over many competitors. We receive a full package of services: from support for popular streaming applications, through support for screen mirroring, to AirPlay (so that iPhone users feel at home). Additionally, there is the Google Assistant, recently updated to Gemini AI, which not only answers questions but also efficiently executes simple commands (e.g., changing channels or searching for content in VOD). The system itself operates quite responsively. However, one cannot overlook a certain downside: the awkward translations in the Polish menu can elicit a smile but sometimes require a moment's thought to decipher their meaning.

Classic Features

In terms of classic television functions, the TCL C69K / Q6C fares rather average. We will not find USB recording or PiP mode here, which may be disappointing for some users. However, the manufacturer has not forgotten the basics: teletext television and a clear EPG are available, which still matter to certain users. In daily use, the support for external audio devices via Bluetooth is also useful. It’s a simple way to connect, for example, a speaker or headphones, which can be a practical solution for seniors. Beyond that, however, it's hard to find elements that would distinguish C69K / Q6C from its rivals – it is simply a solid but standard package of basic functions.

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a real enigma. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can struggle with basic things like Polish characters. Files with letters such as ą, ł, ć or ś in their names often refuse to open or are displayed incorrectly. This looks strange, as we seemingly have codec support, yet the television simply gets lost on simple matters related to the alphabet. Fortunately, this is not a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV we can simply install another player, e.g. VLC. Then the issue with Polish characters disappears completely, and using multimedia becomes hassle-free.

The built-in media player in TCL C69K / Q6C performs really well – practically all popular file formats work without major issues. There are indeed minor exceptions, particularly with less common codecs or unusual video file configurations, but in everyday use, this is rarely noticeable. The biggest advantage, however, is that the television runs on Google TV, which provides complete freedom in choosing additional software. If someone encounters a file that the standard player does not support, it's enough to install an alternative – such as VLC – and the problem disappears.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

5/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with really decent sound, considering it is a super budget television. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has let us down across the board. The sound resembles the sensation of the equipment playing from underwater: flat, devoid of any bass or depth. The only upside remains the wide support for audio formats, such as Dolby Atmos or DTS:X, but in practice, it changes very little. If you are considering this television, you must immediately factor in a soundbar, as without it the audio experience will be quite disappointing.

In terms of audio, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The manufacturer has been boasting about its collaboration with the Onkyo brand for several years, and it indeed translates into sound quality. The sound is pleasant, with clear mids and a fairly clean top end, and overall it feels well-balanced. Of course, it cannot replace a full-fledged soundbar, especially regarding bass depth, but for built-in speakers in a television of this price range – it is really very good.

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data