XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    5.8

Advantages

  • VA matrix with good native contrast and decent blacks

  • Support for Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – a vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (approx. 94% DCI-P3)

  • Decent colours after SDR mode calibration

  • Support for popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, clear remote with a numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast of the VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Support for HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap television)

  • Good readability of fonts – works well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with a numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • No real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g. Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – lack of chroma 4:4:4, strong dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky construction, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and sound switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing are practically non-existent

  • Very weak sound, virtually no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Absence of any smoothness-enhancing features makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface works slowly, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance does not reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it is simply a copy of last year's model with a different label. And there is some truth to that, as the main new feature, or rather the only noticeable difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. Credit must be given to Xiaomi, as this addition really does make a difference – it is not a solution for professional gamers, but a nod towards those looking for a smoother image during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple yet clever idea that distinguishes it in the “super-budget” segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, excitement quickly dwindles. Even though the year has changed on the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 have remained – the system can still experience strange stutters, and the occasional errors can be quite irritating. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing, which worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many limitations in the design that the competition at a similar price point is already attempting to mask. In terms of picture quality, we will not deceive you either. A brightness level of 200–300 nits does not stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, with simpler streaming content, one can manage to watch something, but with high-budget productions, it is immediately evident why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us almost every time. And here we get to the crux of the matter. The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really require very little. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it works quite well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games due to the 120 Hz mode, they may even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average picture quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it’s really just the price. This is a model that is primarily meant to be cheap, and it accomplishes that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget model at 60 Hz", Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which, when connected to a console, really improves the experience and makes everything quite responsive. But... there’s the catch. The biggest issue with this television is its brightness, or rather the lack of it. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and unclear, despite having a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is essentially just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary punch, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically lag behind other cheap screens. The question is whether you will get along with the Titan OS system, which is currently a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard at the competition. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs aplenty, the Philips PUS7000 is in for a really tough battle. If you value a known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget model like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the use of a VA panel. It is responsible for quite a decent contrast, which in our measurements oscillated around 5000:1 – 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with a fairly deep black – something that is difficult to find in competitive models with an IPS panel without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added a feature for global dimming of the entire panel. It sounds good, but… we advise you to turn it off immediately. Why? Because the screen begins to behave very strangely in darker scenes – sometimes it dims so much that practically nothing is visible, while at other times it brightens so much that the already dark blue black turns into a bright blue. At that moment, we felt as if the television was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this feature, the contrast looks really solid. It is definitely not on the level of advanced televisions with local dimming, but in its price range, it will comfortably satisfy most users – especially if you are not watching in a completely dark room, but have at least a little light in the background, which effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue black".

The model PUS7000 tested by us in the size of 55 inches has been equipped with a VA panel. This is of great importance for the quality of black, as in such budget constructions we will not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. All the work thus rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at the level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewing than in the case of competing televisions with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, which means that dark parts of the image do not appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. It is worth adding, however, that with the lights completely off, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it is advisable to consider watching the television with light, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips televisions, which optically increases contrast through a glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we will not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series, such as the PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

If you are hoping for a cinema-grade HDR effect in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, you better cool your expectations quickly. This television is simply too dim to fully showcase the capabilities of contemporary films or series designed for the highest image quality. Our measurements showed brightness in the range of 200–300 nits, which is more akin to SDR content than ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that while most films may look fine, they certainly won't evoke that "wow" effect that other televisions are known for. Fortunately, not everything is lost – we must credit the PFS LED filter used here, which is a solution similar to the quantum dot technology found in QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colours in the vast majority of materials.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. The screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to properly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it is better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as discussed below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers enhancing colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode took us by surprise – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as Hollywood standard resembled more of a shop window display. The white balance was shifted towards blue, leading to significant colour mistakes and burnt-out scenes in SDR content. It was slightly better, though still not perfect, in HDR materials. There were also issues there – the colour saturation and the entire palette consistently drifted towards cooler tones, resulting in an image that had more of an artificial, cold tint instead of a cinematic character. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should showcase this television, we got an effect far from expectations.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw came to light. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and overly low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one may get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find quite a few functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Although Xiaomi is not a brand associated with top-tier televisions, it must be acknowledged that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left plenty of calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR image gained a completely new look. Colours stopped drifting towards blue tones, whites took on a more natural quality, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was somewhat different with HDR materials. Here, it was immediately evident what we had already mentioned – clipping in bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration helped only partly, as the limitations of the panel itself played a role. However, it must be emphasized that for SDR, the television had transformed beyond recognition and in a decidedly positive direction.

After professional calibration, it is evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not at all a given. The effects should be evaluated in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the picture looks really good. Most colour errors have fallen below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions usually begin to be visible to the naked eye in measurements. Films, series, sports, and regular television look natural, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be clearly stated that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for reasonable HDR, and calibration changes very little in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: the colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions to expand the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most apparent in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The television really handles colour blending well, and in most scenes, it's difficult to spot any imperfections. This is most evident in the bright segments of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect; the image is then smooth and natural. Darker scenes present slightly worse, where characteristic banding can be noticed. Fortunately, this is not a flaw that stands out prominently, and for most viewers, it will remain practically unnoticed.

In terms of colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It is hard to have any significant reservations here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means that on a bright background, there are no troubling bands or jumps between shades. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, at that point, quite strong 'stepping' of colours is visible. Instead of smooth transitions, we get clear cut-offs between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite irritating and distract from the film itself, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the strengths of this model. One might expect that since the television was not designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would focus on a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower-quality images. Unfortunately – and here we are also faced with significant disappointment. On the positive side, we can note reasonably good upscaling, which handles HD materials and boosts them up to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, this is where the list of advantages ends. The television does not offer any features that improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we get a raw image, exactly as we deliver from an external source. On a large screen, such a lack of support makes lower-quality materials simply look bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older materials, it happens that part of the image gets cut off, which only amplifies the impression that Xiaomi still has a lot of ground to make up in this category.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at low settings. However, it has a drawback: if applied too aggressively, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. Therefore, it would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find a happy medium between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower-resolution materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for nearly all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If it feels too soft for someone, the sharpness slider in the menu can always be adjusted to achieve a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur ():

The fluidity of motion in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that arises from the hybrid matrix used here. At its native 4K resolution, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch films and series. It is precisely with them in mind that the manufacturer has added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – opting for greater fluidity or leaving more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

In this respect, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that is actually the norm, and it is hard to expect anything more. However, the worst part is that the television does not have any features to improve motion smoothness. There is a lack of any supporting systems, both in films and in sports. We must come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw". This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion can appear choppy or unclear. We do not have the option to enable any smoothers that would reduce this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Exactly – since Xiaomi has included the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature, one might expect that they would follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens this enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be admitted, is a great addition in a budget design), we only have a rather odd player panel. It's hard to call it a full-fledged "game bar" – it’s more of a simple overlay on the TV Menu with limited capabilities. And that would be about it. There’s a lack of ALLM, so the TV won’t automatically switch to game mode. There’s no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame sync. We also won’t find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are becoming increasingly standard on consoles. In short: besides the Game Boost 120 Hz, which actually allows for a more enjoyable experience at 1080p or 1440p, the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing that could particularly attract gamers.

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming television, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While it is true that we won’t find support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has ensured several important features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience on consoles. The most important of these are the VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from tearing and keeps it consistent even during sudden drops in frame rate while gaming. In contrast, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the television to the lowest latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be summoned on screen at any time. It allows for a quick preview of the current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

9.5/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
12 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
25 ms
12 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and definitely not its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – in those, the television goes below 10 ms, which can easily be described as an outstanding result, and more than sufficient even for the more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – the input lag then rises to around 25 ms. While these may not be the best figures on the market, they are perfectly acceptable for casual gaming or firing up a console in the evening. Especially since in most cases, it's still worthwhile to enable the 120 Hz mode, which is the most advantageous for gamers.

Another advantage for gamers is the very low input lag of around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so small that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's difficult to notice at all. Playing remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with significantly more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
25ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no point beating around the bush – it's very bad. While the 120 Hz mode can still be used in games at lower resolutions, for daily work the television is completely unsuitable. There's a lack of full support for chroma 4:4:4, meaning fonts are blurred and sometimes even rainbow-like. Additionally, there's significant dithering, causing the image to appear uneven – some pixels shine brighter, others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially coloured and on a dark background) becomes hard to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it’s hard to talk about any comfort here. In this category, we give the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a score of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there’s really no point in dwelling on this further.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming possibilities are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles chroma subsampling 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble rendering fonts cleanly.

Viewing angles

3/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
70%

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 uses a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. When looking at the screen from the side, we quickly notice a loss of quality – colours noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that does not change the fact that this is clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the living room, we need to reckon with this limitation.

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which is directly due to the use of a VA type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just a slight shift to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image to become noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin coating that manages to dull reflections somewhat, so the colours do not lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just remember that it is not an extremely bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In a typical, moderately sunlit living room, it is sufficient, but if you have large windows and plenty of sunshine coming in, it might simply be difficult without blinds or curtains.

In a sunlit room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all due to the fact that the panel is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin coating of the screen does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not so prominent on the panel, but it is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be rather unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Philips PUS7000

TV features

6.1/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

SmartTV - Google TV

The biggest advantage of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It is what gives the television a second life – you can run practically any application on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and lesser-known programmes from the Google Play Store. We are not limited to what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is the case with other budget televisions. Additionally, we have AirPlay, voice search via Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did encounter a few minor hiccups – for example, streaming from a laptop did not always want to work – but despite these shortcomings, Google TV is a huge plus in this setup.

Classic TV Functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be termed a 'senior-friendly' television. The large remote control with a numerical keypad and a considerable number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface facilitate the use of classic television functions. We will not find many advanced features such as USB recording or the PiP function, but the presence of an analogue headphone jack output can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression of a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System Stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered irritating system lags, problems with Miracast, and issues when switching audio sources. There were even instances where it was necessary to reset the television by disconnecting it from the power supply. This simply shows that although Google TV offers huge possibilities, the stability in such a budget-friendly construct can still be quite problematic.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still quite a new operating system and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. Everything functions sluggishly and at times, clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth/RF. This means that we need to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we still could not activate the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting images from Apple devices using the AirPlay function went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very limited application library. The selection is significantly smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programmes is nearly unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 could be a good choice for those who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic programme guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which makes it much easier to operate after dark, and has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting feature is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home cinema systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Apps

9.6/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a real enigma. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can struggle with basic things like Polish characters. Files with letters such as ą, ł, ć or ś in their names often refuse to open or are displayed incorrectly. This looks strange, as we seemingly have codec support, yet the television simply gets lost on simple matters related to the alphabet. Fortunately, this is not a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV we can simply install another player, e.g. VLC. Then the issue with Polish characters disappears completely, and using multimedia becomes hassle-free.

The built-in media player works quite efficiently and handles most popular video formats without significant issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a hard drive or USB stick should not feel constrained. The only drawback concerns the photo browser - not everything functioned correctly, and some files, especially at selected resolutions, did not open at all.

Sound

5/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with really decent sound, considering it is a super budget television. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has let us down across the board. The sound resembles the sensation of the equipment playing from underwater: flat, devoid of any bass or depth. The only upside remains the wide support for audio formats, such as Dolby Atmos or DTS:X, but in practice, it changes very little. If you are considering this television, you must immediately factor in a soundbar, as without it the audio experience will be quite disappointing.

The sound quality is distinctly budget-level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programmes, but when it comes to films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. It's hard to expect anything more at this price, so if better experiences are important to us, it's worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even via the headphone output.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC