TCL C9K vs Philips OLED820

Direct compare

C9K

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3810x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.7

8.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.4

    8.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.0

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    5.7

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    6.8

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    7.7

Advantages

  • Very good contrast and black levels

  • Very high brightness

  • Support for all HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Fast 144Hz panel - for gaming and sports enthusiasts

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, low input lag, etc.

  • GoogleTV operating system with a wide range of applications

  • Excellent sound branded by Bang & Olufsen

  • Improved viewing angles thanks to WHVA panel

  • Ideal contrast and black thanks to the WOLED panel

  • High HDR brightness (up to 1300 nits) and wide coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette (99%)

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Great motion smoothness, no motion blur, refresh rate up to 144 Hz

  • Full support for gamers: HDMI 2.1 (2 ports), VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Dolby Vision in games, low input lag

  • Ambilight that has a real impact on the perception of the image and distinguishes the television from the competition

  • GoogleTV system with a vast application base and excellent voice assistant

  • Extras including: Backlit remote control and swivel stand

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X audio formats

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming needs improvement

  • Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and PiP

  • No smaller variants, e.g. 55"

  • Only two HDMI 2.1 ports (with 2 consoles and a soundbar we are forced to "juggle" with the cables)

  • Lack of many classic "TV" functions, e.g. recording to USB or PiP mode, infrared remote may be irritating

  • Slight issues with colour blending (much better than last year but far from the competition)

  • Problems with font readability when working with PC (lack of full support for Chroma 4:4:4)

Our verdict

TCL C9K is a television that on paper looks like a showcase of the manufacturer's strength – thousands of Mini-LED zones, a WHVA panel, audio system from Bang & Olufsen, full support for HDR formats, gaming at 144 Hz, and even 288 Hz at lower resolutions. It is clear that TCL wanted to include absolutely everything it had best. And indeed – in many aspects, the C9K is capable of impressing. The brightness is enormous, HDR in large scenes can be stunning, motion fluidity and capabilities for gamers are at a top level, and the sound – considering it is built into the television – sounds really good. This is a device that can easily be regarded as a home entertainment hub. But there is also a downside. Managing brightness simply falters despite the incredible technical specifications – finer details often get lost in shadows or are blown out. And although synthetic tests of contrast and brightness perform excellently, the effect during everyday viewing of films and series is no longer so impressive.

In short: the C9K is a television full of contrasts – literally and metaphorically. It can deliver experiences similar to top screens, but it is still evident that TCL needs to work on software and optimisation. If someone is looking for a screen for gaming, sports, or spectacular blockbusters – they will be delighted. However, if they expect perfect representation of the director's vision and think they have managed to purchase an absolutely top model at half the price of the competition, they will unfortunately be disappointed. It's a shame, because the technological potential here is truly enormous – it just lacked a bit of common sense in its utilisation.

Philips OLED820 is a very successful and significant step forward compared to last year's model, the OLED 819. For many people, the main reason for purchase will, of course, be Ambilight: the multi-coloured lighting system that distinguishes Philips televisions from the competition. It's not hard to see why, as it made a huge impression on us as well. It's not just an impressive gadget, but a real addition that can transform the experience of the content being viewed and add depth to it. However, Ambilight should not overshadow what the OLED820 offers as a screen. We have almost infinite contrast, high brightness in HDR films, and excellent colour reproduction, which improves even further after slight tweaking or professional calibration. This set guarantees one of the best images that can currently be found on the market, and on top of that, we are aware that the television offers something unique and unattainable anywhere else. It is also a device that performs well in gaming. The 144 Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 ports open up access to the full potential of next-generation consoles, and the low input lag ensures that gameplay is exceptionally responsive. The operating system – Google TV – also deserves praise. It is a much better solution than the proprietary Titan OS found in lower models of Philips, such as the OLED770. This is a serious argument for paying extra for this model. A larger library of applications, a more efficient voice assistant, and fewer system errors translate into a distinctly better daily experience. Of course, the Philips OLED 820 is not free from minor flaws – there are some shortcomings in the software, and certain functions could be better refined. Nevertheless, the overall presentation is very solid. Perhaps the OLED820 is not a revolutionary television, but it is a very successful and well-balanced proposition in Philips's offering. It combines excellent image quality, a full set of functions for gamers, and a unique addition in the form of Ambilight. If you are looking for a solid OLED in the mid-range that, aside from good image quality, offers something distinctive and simultaneously exceptional, the OLED820 should be high on your shopping list.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Silver
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

8.1/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 3024 (42 x 72)

Contrast:

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

459,000:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

72,750:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

30,350:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

9,800:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

12,200:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

What immediately distinguishes the C9K from the C8K model is the number of backlight zones. In the 65-inch version, we counted… over 3000! One has to admit – it's a true display of TCL's strength, cramming literally everything they had at hand into this television. On paper, it makes a huge impression and indeed – in less demanding movie scenes, the blacks look fantastic. The level is absolutely top-notch, and the separation of lights from dark parts of the image can be impressive. The problem is that this impressive specification does not always translate into practice. In our tests, we noticed situations where the C9K, despite having a greater number of zones, could fall into contrast traps and performed… worse than the C8K. For instance, it struggles to perfectly dim the true black bars in 21:9 format films (those with black bars at the top and bottom). Sounds strange? Unfortunately, it's the result of a lack of optimisation – the hardware is 'packed' with technology, but the algorithms do not always keep up with making use of that potential.

Don't get us wrong – black levels are a strong point of the C9K and in many scenes, it looks simply fantastic. In synthetic measurements, the contrast performs remarkably well, coming close to the levels of the best televisions on the market. But in real cinematic usage, these numbers do not always correlate with a better experience than with its cheaper cousin. And that is perhaps the greatest disappointment – because the potential was huge.

Contrast and black are the domain of OLEDs, and the Philips OLED820 is no exception. The applied WOLED panel from LG Display functions just like in the LG C5 models or the Samsung S90F, providing exactly what we expect – perfect black and infinite contrast. Whether we are watching challenging scenes full of intricate details or simpler shots immersed in uniform black, the television always performs flawlessly. It separates light from darkness with surgical precision, creating an extraordinary sense of depth in the image. And while one can debate various technologies, in this category, OLED simply reigns supreme, and the Philips OLED820 only confirms this rule.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

7.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 96.5%, Bt.2020: 80.5%
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 76.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1425 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

531 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1277 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

331 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1424 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1035 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1235 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1356 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1315 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

521 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED820

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

TCL C9K

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

As we mentioned with black and contrast – the C9K makes a huge impression in synthetic tests. Our measurements showed that on a screen 10% filled with white, the television is capable of squeezing out... 4000 nits of brightness! It sounds cosmic, but – and here unfortunately the pattern repeats – the numbers say one thing, and practice another. In real film scenes, the situation looks different. In the best case, when the light effects occupy a large part of the image and the local dimming algorithm doesn't have to think too hard about what to do with thousands of zones – the result is really quite good. At that point, the C9K can reach about 1500 nits, which provides a pleasant, intense flash and can indeed make a positive impression.

The problem begins with smaller elements – such as stars in the sky, the moon, or individual reflections. That's when the proverbial cat comes out of the bag: the algorithms are not yet refined, and brightness drops even to 400–500 nits. This is a huge difference compared to the potential of 4000 nits that we saw in laboratory tests. Why does this happen? Most likely, the television tries to protect the black and minimise the halo effect around bright objects. Unfortunately, this comes at the cost of details – some of the intricate details simply disappear, and the scene loses its nature.

When it comes to HDR quality, the Philips OLED820 uses the same class of WOLED panel found in its biggest rivals – the LG C5 and Samsung S90F. This means we can expect really solid results. This year, mid-range OLED panels can exceed the threshold of a thousand nits, and the tested model reaches around 1300 nits in some films. This is an outstanding result, allowing the director's vision to be conveyed with immense precision, as this is the brightness range in which contemporary productions are mastered. Of course, there are situations where even the OLED820 has to compromise. Full-screen scenes filled with white, like those in the film The Meg, can drop brightness to 400–500 nits, which clearly weakens the effect. This is a characteristic of OLED technology that has yet to be fully eliminated. Despite this limitation, it is hard not to appreciate the HDR in this model – high luminance and a wide DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage of 99% make the image simply look fantastic.

Factory color reproduction

4.5/10

6.7/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

For colour tests, we once again reached for the Filmmaker mode – a new feature in TCL televisions for 2025. And although the direction itself is a step in the right direction, the execution leaves much to be desired. The white balance in SDR content turned out to be too warm – there was an excess of red. Conversely, in HDR, it swung in the opposite direction: the image became excessively blue. The Colour Checker test revealed quite a few colour inaccuracies that were noticeable to the naked eye. An even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned above – managing brightness. Regardless of whether we were watching SDR or HDR content, the image had a tendency to blow out the entire scene, giving it an unnatural, almost grotesque character. Therefore, it is hard to call this a 'director’s mode' – because the director surely has never seen such an image.

The colour reproduction in the factory settings really surprised us, and positively so. The Philips OLED820, switched to Filmmaker mode, immediately showed that it was quite well tuned in terms of colour. The white balance was relatively accurate, though there was a slight deficiency in the blue hue, which occasionally gave the image a slightly yellowish tint. However, this is not a flaw that particularly detracts from everyday viewing. A bigger issue arose with the brightness characteristics. The gamma curve clearly deviated from the ideal, with the line below the expected values, causing the image to be excessively brightened, and the colours looked as if they were covered with a light milky filter. This effect was also noticeable in tests using the Colour Checker pattern, where more pronounced errors appeared.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.3/10

After calibration, we finally managed to tame the white balance – and it immediately translated into a more natural image. Colours finally started to look as they should, and the overall presentation was incomparably better than with the factory settings. In other words – it’s worth taking a moment to improve this, as the gain is really significant. The gamma responsible for managing brightness was also brought under control in SDR content, and the effect was more than satisfactory. Unfortunately, when we switched on the HDR material, the situation quickly became complicated. No matter how we set the local dimming, the television had a tendency to do what it pleased with the image – either overexposing the whole picture or dimming the darkest parts too much. Just like we saw in the scene from the film Billy Lynn. Colour-wise, the improvement after calibration makes a great impression, but managing brightness in HDR remains the Achilles' heel of the C9K and constitutes a technological limitation.

After calibration, both the Filmmaker mode and the gaming mode gained a lot. A slight adjustment of the white balance and an improvement in brightness characteristics produced excellent results in SDR content – the image looked almost perfect, natural, and very close to reference. In the case of HDR materials, the situation was similar, the colours were presented wonderfully, and it was hard to find anything to criticise. However, we noticed a certain feature, which we already pointed out when comparing scenes from the film Billy Lynn. The analysis of the EOTF curve showed that the television has a slight tendency to dim details in the blacks, so the darkest parts are not always displayed exactly as intended by the director. Nevertheless, the effect after calibration is stunning, and the OLED820 is emerging as one of the more interesting screens in its class. It just needs a little pampering, and there really is nothing to worry about.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.7/10

6.5/10

In terms of the fluidity of tonal transitions, TCL C9K performs really well. In more challenging movie scenes, there is no typical banding of colours that can break immersion, even in more expensive televisions. Perhaps slight issues can be noticed in the brightest parts – for instance, in scenes from the film Kingstone – but these are nuances. For the vast majority of viewers, especially with 4K content, the colour gradation will appear smooth and practically unnoticeable.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is unfortunately the Achilles' heel of the Philips OLED820. During testing, we noticed slight issues with colour blending – both in bright and darker scenes, one can perceive distinctive banding that detracts from the naturalness of the image. It must be acknowledged that compared to last year's OLED 819 model, there is a significant improvement, but nevertheless, the competition performs better in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

The digital image processing in TCL C9K is rather mediocre. The tone transition smoothing feature is supposedly present, but activating it hardly makes any difference – colour banding is still visible, and it can inadvertently highlight elements we would prefer to hide, such as textures of objects. Fortunately, it does not remove film grain, but that's scant consolation considering the effects are still poor. Thus, it's hard to recommend using this option.

On the other hand, image scaling performs significantly better. Lower quality materials look quite decent – characters and backgrounds are represented clearly, although of course, with sources like 576p, the limitations of the physics cannot be disguised. Sometimes, there's characteristic aliasing of objects, but that's due to the source itself, not the algorithm. A plus for the fact that there are no overscan issues – the image is neither artificially cropped nor enlarged.

Fortunately, the earlier effects of the mentioned posterisation can be quite effectively mitigated. The "distortion reduction" function set to a medium level deals with unwanted colour banding, improving the smoothness of tonal transitions. It does happen that it works a bit too aggressively and also smooths out some details – such as minor skin imperfections of the actors – but nevertheless, it can be considered worth using without substantial compromises. The upscaling in the OLED820 also performs quite well. The test image with the model is exceptionally soft, sometimes even too much so, although this can be rectified by slightly boosting the sharpness in the picture menu – this is really a matter of individual preference. The absence of overscan issues with very low-resolution content is also commendable, meaning we don't have to worry that the image will be unnecessarily cropped.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
51%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Smużenie (1080p@288Hz):

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

Similar to the C8K, the C9K is also a really fast television – both figuratively and literally. On board, we have a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, and at lower resolutions, the panel can even ramp up to 288 Hz. Such speed translates into practice – while watching sports or playing games, the picture looks very smooth and clear. Additionally, in films, we get an extra motion smoothing feature called Motion Clarity, which allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences – from the cinematic "stuttering" of frames to nearly theatrical smoothness.

The fluidity of motion is an area where OLEDs always shine, and the Philips OLED820 confirms this rule. The panel itself offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which primarily benefits PC gamers, but even with standard television sources or consoles, where it operates at 120 Hz, the motion is fast, sharp and simultaneously smooth, without signs of blurring. This is thanks to the remarkable response time between pixels, which maintains image clarity in every dynamic scene. The manufacturer has also added its own smoother called "Motion Style". In the menu, we find two sliders – the first, responsible for fluidity, allows adjustments to the number of artificially added frames in films. This way, we can choose a raw, cinematic character with a distinctly visible film frame or a more theatrical image with smooth motion. The second slider is for motion blur reduction, particularly useful in sports broadcasts. Here, we definitely recommend setting it to the maximum value, as the effect is truly excellent.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 288Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gaming, the TCL C9K is a complete tool. Here we have two (out of four) HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps, so all the key technologies work: VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). Additionally, the manufacturer has included a really intuitive Game Bar, which allows you to quickly check the most important parameters and adjust settings without rummaging through the menu. Also worth noting is TCL's policy – the television does not shy away from any HDR formats, even in game mode. Whether it's HGiG or Dolby Vision for the Xbox Series S/X console – everything works as it should, giving the player a wide range of freedom.

The Philips OLED820 is one of the most complete televisions for gamers. On board, we find practically everything one could expect: two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps (it's a shame there aren't four), variable refresh rate VRR, automatic game mode ALLM, support for Dolby Vision in games, and a good implementation of the HGiG mode. The television handles lower resolutions at 120 Hz with ease, so one can count on considerable flexibility when choosing different picture modes on the console. Philips also includes a Game Bar – a panel that allows changing picture modes, adding a crosshair, or previewing parameters. Although it looks rather clunky and is less polished than that of the competition, it does its job. In practice, therefore, the OLED820, in addition to a full set of four HDMI 2.1 ports, offers nearly everything a gamer could need.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
13 ms
1080p120
7 ms
5 ms
2160p60
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms
5 ms

In terms of input lag, the TCL C9K performs exceptionally well. With 120 Hz content, the delay reaches only 7 ms, placing it among the very best televisions available on the market. Naturally, with 60 Hz materials, the input lag increases to around 15–16 ms, but in practice, this has little impact on the final responsiveness of the screen to our actions on the pad.

The input lag on the Philips OLED820 is truly at a reference level. Measurements showed values below 5 ms, placing it among the absolute top televisions available on the market. Even the Dolby Vision mode does not pose any problems in this regard, which is quite a rare phenomenon. In practice, this means lightning-fast response to every movement, no noticeable delays, and complete comfort in dynamic games. In short, superb results that will delight even the most demanding gamers.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
7ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RWBG
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

When it comes to office work, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – thanks to its 4:4:4 chroma support, the readability of fonts is at a good level, so writing or working with documents should not be a problem. One might notice slight issues with dimming horizontal lines, but in everyday use, it's hard to call this a real flaw. However, the greatest potential of the C9K reveals itself in PC gaming. Here, the television showcases its full capabilities – it can switch to lower resolutions, such as Full HD, and display images at up to 288 Hz. Additionally, it supports both G-Sync and FreeSync, so image synchronisation with the graphics card works flawlessly. It's difficult to have any major reservations about this set – it's truly a top-tier screen for computer gaming.

Cooperation with a PC in the case of the Philips OLED820 varies depending on the application. For gaming, it performs exceptionally well: a high refresh rate of 144 Hz combined with G-Sync support provides the smoothness and responsiveness that other televisions can envy. The situation is less favourable when it comes to text work. The lack of proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4 causes fonts on coloured backgrounds to appear slightly blurred, which significantly reduces work comfort. Therefore, it's hard to recommend the OLED820 as a screen for office work with text or numbers. It's a shame the manufacturer hasn't learned from last year's models and this flaw continues to be repeated.

Viewing angles

4.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
75%
34%

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the WHVA panel, which is designed to provide better viewing angles than standard VA panels. And indeed – progress is visible. Looking at the screen from the side, the image is clearer and colours do not degrade as quickly as in previous models. However, this does not mean that we are dealing with the level of top-end coatings or solutions known from IPS panels, and certainly not from OLEDs. The picture remains readable, but brightness clearly decreases. This is definitely a step forward compared to earlier TCL models, but not yet a complete revolution.

The viewing angles in the Philips OLED820 are another advantage that should please you. OLEDs have always been characterised by almost perfect angles, so regardless of where we look from, the image remains clear and legible. Indeed, the classic WOLED matrix does not compare to technologies like MLA OLED or QD-OLED, but it's still hard to find fault here. The angles are simply excellent.

TV efficiency during daytime

7/10

5.7/10

Matrix coating
Glare
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED820: 345 cd/m2

TCL C9K: 642 cd/m2

The new WHVA matrix coating has its strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, it handles smaller reflections quite well, while on the other hand, with stronger light sources, it is evident that the suppression of reflections is not at the highest level. Fortunately, the coating does not ruin what is most important: the blacks and colour saturation. This is a definite plus because in many competing models, compromises in this area are more painful. Additionally, there is very high brightness – in SDR content, the C9K can achieve an average of 650 nits in SDR materials. This is a result that is more than sufficient for watching television or films in more challenging lighting conditions, even on a sunny day.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
V8-0012T01-LF1V538.002459
TPM231WW_R.201.100.146.207
Image processor
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM
MT5896 3GB

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

7.7/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV Features

In terms of basic TV functions, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – it has everything that most users expect. The EPG guide operates smoothly, teletext is available, and pairing Bluetooth headphones, a mouse or a keyboard is trouble-free. However, it should be noted that in the Google TV system – as in other TCL models – there is a lack of more advanced options, such as recording programmes or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode. Some might find this insufficient, especially if they have used such features on competitors' devices. It is also worth mentioning that we only have one USB port available – sufficient to connect a drive with films or a USB stick, but if someone plans to use multiple drives, they might find this lacking.

Smart Features

While in terms of classic solutions the TCL C9K does not stand out, it showcases its full potential in the realm of smart features. The Google TV system is currently the most popular platform, and it is easy to see why – the app library is huge. Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, HBO Max, Amazon Prime Video – all are readily available. Only those who are very attached to more closed ecosystems, such as Apple Music, will feel the absence. A significant advantage is the built-in voice assistant – it works quickly, understands natural commands, and allows convenient control of the television: from changing channels to opening applications, searching for content, or checking the weather. This is precisely where the TCL C9K demonstrates that a smart TV is more than just an "internet-enabled television" – it is a tool that genuinely enhances everyday use of the equipment.

GoogleTV on OLED820

Philips OLED820 runs on the Google TV system, which immediately places it among televisions that truly offer user freedom. It’s a fantastic platform that needs no introduction – it boasts almost an endless number of applications, from popular VOD services to niche programmes or games. Google TV also allows you to personalise the home screen, tailoring content to our preferences, so the television actually “learns” our viewing style. A significant advantage is also the voice assistant from Google – fast, natural, and effective. It can understand even less obvious questions, and in practice, it works much better than many competitors. Unfortunately, there was a hiccup – the screen mirroring feature simply did not work during testing. This can be considered a minor issue, but in 2025, such things simply shouldn’t happen.

Classic Features of OLED820

When it comes to classic additions, the OLED820 does not try to play conservative notes. On one hand, we get a backlit remote control with a numerical keypad that is quite well organised and easy to use. On the other hand – you have to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared, which is more reminiscent of equipment from a decade ago than a modern television. It also lacks some features that are often found in competitors – there is no USB recording from tuners or a PIP mode. A nice touch among the classic solutions is the analogue mini-jack headphone input. This is rare today and could prove useful – whether for a senior with an additional headphone station or for someone who would like to connect older speakers.

AmbilightTV OLED820

One cannot overlook Ambilight, which is a hallmark of Philips. This solution impacts not only the appearance of the television but also the reception of content. The illumination system can be set up in various ways, from a multi-coloured mode that dynamically tracks the image to calmer, static backlighting. We definitely recommend the latter option, as the gentle light behind the screen makes the content being watched, combined with the OLED matrix, look even deeper and more engaging. It’s a simple yet very effective addition that has given Philips televisions character for years.

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The C9K handled most of the materials we put on the pendrive without any issues – from films in MKV format, through older AVI files, to audio tracks in DTS and FLAC. The only drawback remains the lack of support for photos in HEIC format from Apple devices, but this is a common issue among all manufacturers. However, the most important thing is that if someone is missing support for some exotic format, they can always turn to an alternative player available in the Google Play store. And this is where the advantage of the Google TV system becomes apparent – the ease with which one can expand the functionality of the television with additional applications.

The Philips OLED820 has a built-in file player with USB, which at first glance looks quite clunky, but in practice works surprisingly well. One could even say that it is one of the best built-in players available in televisions. It handles practically every type of file: photos, videos or music, with a few minor exceptions that most of the competition does not support either. And if someone still feels like something is missing, there is always the option of installing the VLC application from the Google Play library, and the problem disappears.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7.9/10

7.7/10

  • Maximum volume
    77dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound in the TCL C9K is handled by the same set as in the C8K model – prepared in cooperation with Bang & Olufsen. It is a 4.2.2 configuration with a total power of 90 W, consisting of eight speakers positioned to create a fuller sense of space. And it must be admitted – the effect is impressive. Dialogues are clear, the highs and mids sound clean, and the bass does not get lost even during louder sessions. Of course, this will not replace a dedicated soundbar or home cinema system, but for built-in speakers – there is truly something to listen to.

*During tests of maximum volume, we noticed an unusual behaviour of the audio system. When the slider is set to 100%, the television reaches about 76–78 dB, but it can be heard that it is trying to generate greater power, after which the sound level is immediately corrected to the mentioned value. On the other hand, when we lower the volume to, for example, 70%, it initially drops as expected, but after a while it slowly rises back to the same level of 76 dB. This effect gives the impression of an aggressive limiter at work, which, regardless of the slider position, always brings the volume down to one level. We checked this behaviour several times, and in every case the result was identical – no additional “smart” volume adjustment or AI functions were active during this.

The Philips OLED 820 features a built-in 4.1 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. At the back of the casing is a subwoofer, which is responsible for quite solid and deep bass. The classic speakers responsible for the rest of the range are located at the bottom of the television, which means that the sound does not always spread in the way we would want. However, the overall sound can be considered acceptable – series, television programmes, or occasional music listening are satisfactory, with a slight bass support. This should be sufficient for daily use, although we still recommend purchasing even an inexpensive soundbar, which will significantly improve the user experience.

Acoustic Measurements

77dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC