TCL C8L / QM8L vs SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

Direct comparison

C8L / QM8L

Info

BRAVIA 3 II / XR35M2

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.3

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    6.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.5

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.2

    6.7

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    8.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    7.2

  • Watching in bright light

    10.0

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    8.3

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    8.1

    6.8

Advantages

  • Very good black levels: Mini-LED backlighting

  • High peak brightness: results reaching nearly 5000 nits

  • Excellent daytime performance: the powerful backlight easily cuts through reflections on the panel

  • Very good colours: new SQD quantum dots

  • Pentonic 800 processor: a noticeable quality leap in upscaling and the performance of digital features

  • Four full HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Excellent specs for gamers: exceptionally low input lag (below 10 ms), refresh rates up to 288 Hz with VRR, and support for HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Google TV: the system runs quickly and allows installation of a large number of apps

  • Good sound: audio branded by premium Bang & Olufsen

  • Very good motion handling and exceptionally low motion blur for a 120Hz LCD TV

  • 4 × HDMI 2.1 48 Gb/s, finally!

  • Plenty of gaming features: VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Wide colour gamut, QLED (PFS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • Google TV with a wide range of apps and features

  • Broad audio format support: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Record programmes to USB

  • Two remote controls included

Disadvantages

No like
  • Not faithful to the creator's intent: the TV tends to boost brightness

  • Slight smearing

  • High price for what it offers; for only slightly more you can buy the much better BRAVIA 5 model

  • No local dimming

  • No proper HGiG support

  • Average processing of lower-quality source material

Our verdict

TCL C8L is undoubtedly one of the most intriguing Mini-LED televisions that has entered our laboratory this year. This model stands out primarily due to its excellent price-to-performance ratio. TCL has already accustomed us to aggressive pricing for its screens, but in the case of the C8 series, the manufacturer has managed to push the boundaries even further. For the amount that often only allows the purchase of mid-range models or two such models like C8K in the competitive market, here we receive equipment and specifications equal to top models. The new image processor, four full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for extreme refresh rates, and powerful peak brightness thanks to a vast number of dimming zones are arguments that are hard to overlook.

However, analysing the whole picture, one must honestly summarise the character of this television. The C8L is equipment designed more for displaying “spectacular” images rather than rigorously faithful ones. What do we mean by this? The software and algorithms managing the Mini-LED backlight zones have been tuned to favour visual appeal – the image is meant to be bright, contrasty, and striking in saturation. And what does this mean? The television has a tendency to autonomously interpret images instead of adhering to certain studio standards. For most users looking for “greater” emotions in films or games, this effect will likely be an advantage. On the other hand, purists and fans of perfectly natural images (such as us 😉) may find this behaviour too aggressive and not in line with the director's intent. Hence, we leave the final assessment on this matter to you.

Generally speaking, despite this specificity, the TCL C8L is a television that we can, and indeed must, wholeheartedly recommend. It is primarily a premium-class product, doing literally everything right... to a fault. Certain imperfections we would simply treat as features of this device rather than flaws – mainly due to the technological limitations that all Mini-LED televisions from any manufacturer on the market have accustomed us to. Ultimately, the software refinement has brought a lot to the new model, resulting in a mature, confident, and nearly complete piece of equipment.

The Sony Bravia 3 II is a TV that quickly reveals the idea the manufacturer had for this model. It's meant above all to be a sensible Bravia for gaming, and in that respect the changes are substantial. After all, Sony has fixed one of the biggest annoyances of its TVs, the presence of only two full-featured HDMI 2.1 ports. Here there are four, and that alone makes the Bravia 3 II a much more convenient choice for anyone who wants to connect a lot of gaming kit. Fortunately it doesn't stop at gaming. The 120 Hz panel performs very well for motion, motion blur is minimal, and the motion-smoothing systems work surprisingly effectively, at times even better than on Sony's top TVs. Sport is therefore another use where the Bravia 3 II feels right at home. On top of that there's Google TV with its full suite of apps and features, so in practical terms this is simply the Sony we've known for years.

The biggest problem with this model, however, is not the TV itself but its current price. The Bravia 3 II is today dangerously close in price to the Bravia 5, and when the extra cost for the higher model is only a few percent, choosing the lower series begins to lose its appeal. The Bravia 5 already offers full Mini-LED backlighting with local dimming, which is exactly what the Bravia 3 II most lacks for evening viewing and in HDR. That's why we view this model through the lens of price. The Bravia 3 II itself is a genuinely successful lower-mid-range TV and with the right pricing could easily be one of the more interesting choices for a gamer or a sports fan. However, if the gap to the Bravia 5 remains small, it will be hard to recommend it with full conviction.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Two remote controls, Stand

Contrast and black detail

8/10

5.6/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 2040 (34 x 60)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

156,600:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

59,250:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

17,400:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

23,650:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

9,250:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,400:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The C8L model certainly cannot be denied one thing: an impressive specification. In the 65-inch variant we tested: the manufacturer packed in as many as 2040 independent local dimming zones (this number, of course, increases or decreases with the screen diagonal). Such a dense packing of light points has a direct impact on the depth of black. The contrast measured by us in film scenes reached impressive five- and six-digit values to one, which is a remarkable result in the LCD world. Is the algorithm perfect? Not entirely. On small, bright elements displayed against a dark background, the trained eye can still discern a slight halo effect and moments when the zones come to life, which is a natural feature of Mini-LED technology. Interestingly, in our test scene with a helicopter, the background was noticeably brighter than on competing screens. Unfortunately, TCL manipulates the brightness curve in a specific way, artificially boosting certain plans, over which we do not have full control from the device's menu. This is an evident weakness of this model that needs to be taken into account. That said, the black levels on this model will be more than satisfactory for most viewers.

The Bravia 3 II uses a VA panel, a solution that by nature delivers significantly better contrast than IPS or ADS panels. In our sample the native contrast ratio was around 5000:1, which is a pretty good result for a TV without local dimming. In practice that means blacks can look genuinely decent in a lightly lit room. Dark parts of the picture don't immediately go grey, and night scenes have noticeably more depth than on many IPS‑panel TVs. However, the poorer black level quality becomes apparent when you turn the lights off. The Bravia 3 II has no local dimming system, so the entire backlight behaves similarly regardless of what’s happening in a particular part of the image. In a dark room it's easy to see that blacks are no longer truly black but start to take on a dark navy cast. It's not a level that severely ruins the film-viewing experience, but during an evening viewing the difference compared with a Mini-LED TV, and even more so with an OLED TV, becomes very clear.

HDR effect quality

7.3/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 97.4%, Bt.2020: 90.3%
DCI P3: 94.2%, Bt.2020: 73.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1637 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

701 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1428 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

405 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1728 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

408 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

430 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

457 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

455 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

TCL C8L / QM8L

In terms of HDR, the TCL C8L turns out to be a hellishly bright television – quite literally. On a synthetic test pattern sized at 5%, our measurement equipment indicated a result exceeding 4500 nits. This is a truly astronomical result, considering that reference monitors used by directors, which we often refer to in our materials, typically operate around 4000 nits. Does this mean that the C8L breaks barriers and climbs to the technological peak of Mini-LED? Not quite. Dry synthetic tests are one thing, while real cinematic images are another. In real, varied scenes, the C8L peaks at around 1600 nits. This is still a very good result, ensuring a very high level of HDR dynamics, but it is also clearly lower than what the manufacturer boasts in the specifications. The problems begin with very small bursts of light – at that point, brightness can drastically drop to around 600 nits. The algorithm tries at all costs to maintain deep blacks and minimise the halo effect, but this comes at the expense of HDR impact. This is perfect evidence that laboratory test patterns rarely align with what we ultimately see on the screen.

However, huge praise is due for colour reproduction, thanks to the new generation of SQD (Super Quantum Dot) quantum dots. The DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage reaches 97%, but the truly jaw-dropping measurements come from the extremely demanding BT.2020 space. The C8L achieves an impressive 90% in this space, placing it alongside today's top screens equipped with RGB backlighting. Importantly, unlike some screens with Micro/Mini RGB backlighting, this effect is stable regardless of the scene displayed. Of course, it’s worth remembering that content mastered for such a wide gamut in films or series is still rare. However, the very fact that the panel has such a "colour reserve" deserves tremendous admiration.

Bravia 3 II is certainly not a TV that tries to impress with brightness. In our measurements it reached about 450 nits, so it falls well short of the brightest models on the market. That does not mean HDR is just a paper feature. Compared with ordinary SDR material, the brightest elements of the image can already come through noticeably, and reflections, highlights and stronger exposures have a bit more energy and stand out better from the rest of the scene. This is most obvious in simpler shots where the screen displays many bright elements. Then the Bravia 3 II can give a hint of a higher dynamic-range picture. The problem only begins with more demanding content, where much greater brightness headroom is required. There the TV quickly shows its limitations and instead of powerful, striking HDR we get only a competently rendered picture.

Colours

Bravia 3 II uses a QLED-type panel, although technically it does not use a classic quantum dot layer. Instead Sony has used a solution based on PFS phosphor, which performs a very similar role: it allows more saturated reds and greens and thus enables a much wider colour gamut. In measurements DCI-P3 coverage was around 94%, and the very wide BT.2020 around 74.4%. These are good results for this class of hardware, which mean the Bravia 3 II has no problem reproducing sufficiently saturated colours in HDR content. Colours do not look washed out, and more intense hues can look genuinely attractive.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

6.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the TCL C8L in the best factory mode available in the TV’s menu for image fidelity. That’s of course Filmmaker Mode, which only arrived in this brand’s software relatively recently (a year ago in the "K" series). It allows the average user to achieve quite decent colour reproduction straight out of the box, though it is certainly not perfectly tuned. Looking at the unit’s out-of-the-box white balance — in both SDR and HDR material — the red component was clearly lacking, which made the image noticeably cooler and slightly shift towards blue‑green tints. The issue of brightness management also looks ambiguous, as we mentioned earlier. While the gamma linearity in SDR content is really good and stays steadily at the reference value of 2.4, the situation in HDR is much worse. Tracking the EOTF curve clearly shows the TV has a noticeably boosted brightness across the entire range, so the final image can be excessively bright and inconsistent with the creators’ intent, and this is in a mode that by definition should avoid that. Of course, as with every sample in our lab, we subjected this one to professional calibration, and you can find the results below.

In Professional mode the Bravia 3 II already delivers a fairly good level of colour reproduction straight out of the box. In SDR the most noticeable issue is a slightly low gamma, which makes the midtones a little brighter. White balance isn't perfect either; as brightness increases the blue and red components become slightly lacking, so whites can at times take on a marginally warmer, faintly greenish tint. These are not faults that immediately catch the eye when watching a film. Average error values hover around 3, so the factory setting can be regarded as quite good. The situation is similar in HDR. Here too there is a slight lack of the blue component, so the image is marginally warmer than the reference, but the difference is not large enough to significantly interfere with normal viewing.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

8/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

As you can see, the results of a professional calibration of the TCL C8L are truly promising, thanks to the comprehensive calibration controls the manufacturer has provided in the menu. Above all, we managed to fully correct the white balance, eliminating the red deficiency, so the image finally stopped drifting into unwanted cool tones. After that adjustment, the errors in the ColorChecker test fell to near-reference values, consistently sitting below a Delta E threshold of 2, i.e. below the visibility threshold for the human eye.

If test patterns look so perfect, you may ask us why the final score in this category is lower. The answer lies in the brightness management described earlier. Although the menu includes sliders that let you precisely straighten the EOTF curve on synthetic signals, when faced with real film material (I recommend enabling the EOTF filter when watching films), it becomes clear that the TV, in most scenarios, still responds to HDR metadata in its own way. As a result, the picture can be slightly over-bright and not faithful to the filmmakers' intent, and it is precisely for this lack of consistency with real films that we had to take a few points off the C8L's score.

After calibration, there is particularly a lot to be gained from SDR content. The white balance was set almost perfectly, the gamma practically matches the reference value, and the average colour errors fell from around 3 to about 1. That is already a level at which differences from the reference image are, in practice, very difficult to detect. The Bravia 3 II therefore shows that, despite its position in Sony’s lineup, it has quite a lot of potential for precise picture calibration. Improvements are also visible in HDR, although here it is no longer possible to avoid all the limitations of the TV itself. After evening out the colours, it is easier to notice that the EOTF curve in film content runs slightly below the reference value in places, so the Bravia 3 II gently darkens part of the image. This is not an ideal solution from a reference point of view, but in this particular TV it also has its benefits. With no local dimming and average black levels, this behaviour slightly reduces the visibility of the backlight in darker scenes and helps maintain a stronger impression of contrast. So you could say Sony partly masks the limitations of the panel this way, instead of trying at all costs to stick to the reference luminance.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

We judge the tonal transitions in the C8L to be almost exemplary. The well-tuned panel and accompanying algorithms mean the TV handles posterization, the ugly, stepped separation of individual shades, very well. Subtle, minimal errors and slight inconsistencies in tone gradation are noticeable only in extremely dark, demanding scenes. Overall, however, when watching good-quality content at native resolution, the transitions between colours are exceptionally smooth and natural-looking.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. In most of the scenes we watched it was hard to notice any problems with blending individual shades. Gradients remain smooth both in bright parts of the image, such as skies or sunsets, and in much more challenging, dark scenes. The only thing that may stand out in our photos, especially in the darkest scenes, is the unevenness of the backlight itself. This, however, is not related to colour gradation. It is rather a consequence of using a backlight without local dimming.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

6/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

This year the C8 series and the higher-end models have probably received the biggest and most eagerly awaited upgrade in TCL’s history, and it concerns digital picture processing. The C8L is the entry-level model in the manufacturer's line-up that has been equipped with the latest flagship chip MediaTek Pentonic 800 (listed in the menu as MT9655). It is thanks to its computing power that the feature called "Gradual Smoothing" finally works as it should. The algorithm effectively removes unwanted posterization (ugly tonal transitions / colour banding) from the image, doing so intelligently enough that it does not degrade the sharpness of other details.

The processor also handles upscaling lower-resolution content to 4K very well. Although assessing this element can be largely academic, because the differences between today’s TVs in this class are very subtle. The most important takeaway is that TCL finally has nothing to be ashamed of compared with the competition.

The Bravia 3 II is Sony's first TV to use the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, and there are a few changes in image processing. Starting with the basics. The upscaling itself is adequate. The TV can sensibly pull up lower-resolution material and does not have a strong tendency to over-emphasise jagged edges or other source imperfections. With regular broadcast TV or weaker streaming material the picture therefore remains quite pleasing. We have more reservations about the digital image processing. In this model Sony has replaced the well-known "Smooth Gradation" function with a new setting called "Digital Noise Reduction". Its role is essentially very similar: it is supposed to smooth unpleasant tonal transitions and artefacts resulting from heavy signal compression. Unfortunately, this function performs noticeably worse than before. At the "High" setting (the only one that had any visible effect) the TV can smooth away too many elements of the image at once, causing film grain to disappear and the texture of objects or even skin to start looking unnatural. Worse still, the effect is not particularly stable. When a scene contains more motion, the function's effect clearly weakens and at times it looks as if the TV stops intervening in the picture altogether. For everyday viewing we therefore would not recommend using it at a high level. It can help on a static shot, but the price is often an excessive loss of detail.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.7/10

8.2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
32%
25%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Blur ():

The TCL C8L is equipped with a fast panel with a native refresh rate of 144 Hz. This specification will be most appreciated by demanding PC gamers, while most users, who rely on consoles or TV broadcasts, will make use of a stable 120 Hz. It is at 120 Hz that the motion-processing algorithms take care of image processing (in films, series and sports). In the TV menu you'll find a "Motion Clarity" tab that allows you to tailor the motion smoothing to your own preferences. The algorithms cope well with both cinematic productions at 24 or 30 frames per second and with fast-paced sports broadcasts at 50 or 60 frames per second, ensuring appropriate smoothness.

Motion handling is definitely one of the Bravia 3 II's strongest points. The TV uses a 120Hz VA panel, a solution that, by nature, despite the high refresh rate, does not always cope well with motion blur. Here, however, Sony has managed to keep that problem very well under control. Fast-moving objects remain crisp, and the characteristic trails and blurring are reduced to a very low level, if not to zero. It is one of the least motion-blur-prone LCD TVs we have tested. Interestingly, in this respect the Bravia 3 II can even outperform the much more expensive True RGB flagship series, the Bravia 9 II.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

8.1/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 288Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gamers – and especially for owners of powerful PCs and several consoles simultaneously – the TCL C8L is a true monster. It is the first model in this manufacturer's lineup to feature as many as four full HDMI 2.1 ports with a maximum bandwidth of 48 Gbps. This is directly attributable to the use of the new Pentonic 800 processor, which we discussed earlier. Additionally, the television seamlessly supports practically every gaming feature. We have an automatic game mode (ALLM) that reduces latency to minimal levels, and full frame synchronization (VRR) operating in an impressive range of up to 288 Hz. There's also talk of standards such as G-Sync or FreeSync from Nvidia and AMD. When it comes to display standards, there are no compromises either: the C8L offers complete support for HDR formats in games, including gaming Dolby Vision and the HGiG profile. We can conveniently manage all of these features from a very readable player bar (Game Bar), which we can personalise to our own preferences. From a purely gaming perspective, there's really nothing to fault the C8L on – well, maybe aside from the previously mentioned slight blurring. But other than that? It's a no-nonsense machine for gamers.

Sony Bravia 3 II is a very good TV for gamers, although not everything has been implemented exactly as we would like. The biggest change concerns the connectors. For the first time in a Sony TV we get as many as four full HDMI 2.1 ports with 48 Gb/s bandwidth, thanks to the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset. That removes one of the issues that has plagued this manufacturer’s TVs for years. We can connect several devices at once and on each input use the device’s full capabilities, for example VRR or ALLM. There is also a simple Game Bar that lets you view key signal parameters and change a few useful settings, such as black level, when you want to improve visibility in darker parts of a game. However, there are two limitations worth knowing. The first is the lack of support for 1440p at 120 Hz. That will not be a problem for everyone, but people using that resolution on a console or PC, for example to get higher frame rates in certain games, will have to choose 1080p. We have more reservations about HGiG support. Sony does not allow you to disable the TV’s tone mapping on the Bravia 3 II, so the screen is always processing HDR content even when you would prefer to leave that task to the console. This is most obvious during HDR setup — the checkerboard pattern does not disappear at the point that corresponds to the TV’s actual capabilities. That does not mean HDR in games will look bad. You just need to approach the setup a little differently and, instead of relying on the pattern, manually set the peak brightness to around 450 nits. The issue can be worked around, but you should know about it before you start setting up the console.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
8 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120 DV
8 ms
8 ms

In our laboratory tests we measured Input Lag of below 10 ms. For a gamer this means a completely imperceptible delay. Importantly, this result can be improved further by forcing the PC to use a refresh rate above 120 Hz. A big plus is the Dolby Vision Game mode; latency there is just as low as in standard SDR and HDR10 modes.

In terms of input lag, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. With a 120 Hz signal the input lag is around 8 ms, while at 60 Hz it rises to about 14 ms, so in both cases the response to controls is very quick and during normal gameplay it would be hard to notice any delay. It's also worth noting the TV's behaviour in Dolby Vision Gaming mode on the Xbox. In that mode input lag remains practically the same, and until recently Sony often had a noticeable problem with this.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

7.2/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The TCL C8L is very well suited to use as a large-format monitor. The TV supports refresh rates up to 288 Hz at Full HD resolution, which will be appreciated by fans of e-sports titles and by owners of less powerful graphics cards in AAA games. The TV also works seamlessly with frame synchronisation systems AMD FreeSync and NVIDIA G-Sync. Importantly for text work, the C8L renders most fonts correctly and legibly. Up close you can notice minor errors in the rendering of letter edges and a slight grain around them, but the issue largely disappears (or rather becomes less noticeable) when you sit at a normal, recommended distance from the screen.

Interaction with a computer is generally good, although again not without a few reservations. The Bravia 3 II properly supports 4:4:4 chroma subsampling, so in typical use text and the system interface look sharp and legible. However, grey fonts are noticeable, with their vertical edges often markedly brighter than the horizontal ones. On a larger screen this is not particularly bothersome, but if someone is considering the smaller variant of the Bravia 3 II as a monitor for working with text, it is worth bearing in mind.

What bothers us more, however, is the lack of additional modes with higher refresh rates. It's not even about 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, but rather the ability to achieve smoother motion at Full HD. This solution is appearing increasingly in competitors' TVs (DLG 240Hz), while Sony still does not offer it, even in its pricier models. For most users, 4K at 120 Hz will of course be entirely sufficient, especially for consoles, but people who also use the TV as a gaming monitor for a PC may feel somewhat disappointed.

Viewing angles

4.5/10

3.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
74%
72%

TCL C8L uses a VA-type panel, which by nature is not known for wide viewing angles. In this case, however, the manufacturer used a proprietary WHVA 2.0 panel from TCL CSOT. Therefore the viewing angles are decidedly better than in average VA panels, which is undoubtedly a plus. Colours and contrast do not degrade as drastically when moving slightly off-axis as is the case with most LCD screens. Overall, it is still at a lower level than IPS panels, and even more so OLED screens, but for a VA LCD panel the improvement is fairly noticeable.

Viewing angles are fairly typical for a VA panel, simply average and, for some, probably poor. The Bravia 3 II looks best when you sit directly in front of the screen. As you move to the side, colours start to lose saturation and blacks become increasingly grey. Unfortunately, that is the price you pay for this panel's high native contrast. Watching with two or three people should not be much of a problem, but on a wide sofa those sitting at the far ends will notice a clearly worse picture.

Daytime performance

10/10

5.8/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2): 447 cd/m2

TCL C8L / QM8L : 1651 cd/m2

The TCL C8L is one of the brightest TVs we’ve tested so far. As you can see from the brightness chart (or rather, you might not) its peak brightness reaches an astronomical 5,000 nits (exactly 4,862). Although that falls to around 600 nits with a full-screen white field, the TV’s overall daytime performance means you can confidently call it practically ideal for very bright, sunlit living rooms. While the glossy panel used here does not suppress reflections as aggressively as matte screens, the screen’s sheer output can cut through most unwanted reflections coming from windows or other artificial light sources such as lamps.

In daytime the Bravia 3 II performs quite respectably, although a lot depends on where you place the TV. The applied satin coating handles reflections adequately; it doesn't act like a mirror, but strong light sources, especially a window opposite the screen, can be distracting while watching. On the plus side, the VA panel means blacks retain quite good depth in daylight and the picture doesn't immediately go grey or become heavily washed out. The brightness of around 450 nits, which the Bravia 3 II can maintain regardless of how many bright elements are on the screen, also helps. For a typical living room this will be more than sufficient and the picture remains clear during the day. However, if the TV is to be placed in a very bright room with large windows and a lot of direct light, you can find models with a noticeably more effective coating and greater brightness reserve.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED Super QLED (SQD)
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V8-0015T01-LF1V080.000644
6140200730
Image processor
mt9655 2,5GB RAM
PENTONIC 800 4GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C8L / QM8L TV Panel details
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV Panel details

TCL C8L / QM8L

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

TV features

8.3/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Very good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV: Google TV

On the internet you can still come across older opinions about the TCL brand where users complained about sluggish performance or occasional freezes of the Google TV interface. In the case of the C8L model, however, there is a significant step forward. Thanks to the new processor and certain stability fixes, Google TV's responsiveness and speed are at a very high level. We can easily compare this system's level of polish with closed systems such as Tizen or webOS found in rival flagship models. The set comes with a full suite of features, led by the updated Gemini voice system.

Television features

On strictly TV matters the C8L simply does its job reliably as a television 😉. You'll find the usual standard features, such as a Bluetooth module for quick pairing of wireless headphones and the still-present teletext for use with the built-in tuners. It is, however, clearly designed primarily for modern streaming platforms. This is evident from the minimalist, modern remote control, which, unlike the cheaper C7L, does not feature a traditional numeric keypad.

Smart TV features: Google TV

The Bravia 3 II runs on Google TV and, in terms of capabilities, is one of the more feature-rich systems currently found in TVs. First and foremost there is access to a very large number of apps, so in addition to the most popular streaming platforms you can also find plenty of less obvious services without much trouble. Sony also supports AirPlay and Chromecast, making it very convenient to cast content from a smartphone. Voice search also performs well, powered by Gemini, which handles commands in multiple languages and can genuinely make using the TV easier. However, during our tests we encountered one problem: the Bravia 3 II would not correctly receive a display from a Windows 11 PC over Miracast. So if you plan to use the television as an external screen for a computer, the most reliable solution remains a connection via HDMI.

Traditional television features

Sony has not forgotten those who still primarily use regular broadcast television. The Bravia 3 II supports recording programmes to USB with the ability to schedule them via PVR, which is rare today, especially in cheaper models. There is also teletext and a clear channel guide, so in terms of basic TV functions we weren't really missing anything, except perhaps picture-in-picture (PiP). A curious touch is that two remote controls are included. The first is modern and simplified (non-backlit version), while the second is a classic design with a full numeric keypad. Although it may seem a little old-fashioned, viewers who watch a lot of traditional television might actually find it more convenient, for example when entering channel numbers.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.4/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in USB media player handles our everyday tests with no problems. It's good to see that the TV natively and smoothly opens even less common image formats, such as Apple's HEIC. We did encounter a few formats that the built-in app couldn't cope with, but with Google TV that's no obstacle. A major advantage of this platform is the ability to install any third-party player (for example VLC) directly from the Google Play store, which often completely solves file compatibility issues.

The built-in player in the Bravia 3 II works really well and during our tests had no trouble with most popular video and audio formats. It's hard to point to anything that would force us to install an additional player or use an external device. The only exception might be films with subtitles saved in .txt format, which the TV does not support, but let's be honest, at this stage that would be nitpicking.

Sound

8.1/10

6.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    78dB
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

It might seem that in terms of sound the TCL C8L will perform exactly the same as last year's C8K. After all, it again features a Bang & Olufsen audio system in a 6.2.2 configuration, with the same power and the same system features, namely Beosonic technology. Nothing could be further from the truth. The new generation sounded noticeably better in our listening tests. Why is that? To be honest, from a purely hardware point of view we don't know, but it's clear on the graphs from our measurements. Perhaps TCL has simply managed to improve the speakers' behaviour with a firmware update and better speaker tuning.

But as we always say, they are still the TV's speakers. We believe anyone who wants to fully enjoy this TV's potential will still have to buy a good soundbar or a home cinema system. The C8L offers full support for audio codecs such as Dolby Atmos and the niche DTS. Only by connecting an external audio setup will you be able to squeeze real, spatial sound from films or games and complete what you see on this TV.

In terms of sound the Bravia 3 II performs adequately, but it's hard to say much more about it. The speakers handle dialogue and regular television well, but they noticeably lack low-frequency response. The bass quickly loses energy, so with music, action films or games the sound feels rather light and lacks punch. That's of course nothing unusual for TVs in this class, but if you want a more impressive sound a soundbar is a highly recommended addition.

The supported audio formats are a much better story. The Bravia 3 II handles practically everything we might need, including Dolby TrueHD, DTS-HD Master Audio and DTS:X, formats increasingly ignored by other manufacturers. The TV can also pass them through to an external audio setup. The exception is Dolby Atmos encoded in Dolby TrueHD, which the built-in speakers cannot play back directly, but with a suitable soundbar or AV receiver this should not be a major issue.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

78dBC (Max)

75dBC

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy