TCL C7K / QM7K vs Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA)

Direct comparison

C7K / Q7C / MQLED85K / C79K / C71K / QM7K

Info

BRAVIA 3 / K-(XX)S3

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 50”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.2

6.2

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    6.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.5

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.6

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    6.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    3.5

  • Watching in bright light

    6.1

    5.4

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    6.1

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.0

    6.5

Advantages

  • Very good black - VA panel with a large number of Mini-LED zones

  • High brightness in HDR - over 1000 nits

  • Excellent for gamers - HDMI 2.1, low input lag, VRR, ALLM, etc.

  • Good motion smoothness - 144Hz panel

  • Supports multiple HDR formats: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision

  • Google TV operating system with access to a vast array of applications

  • Pleasant sound from built-in speakers

  • Significantly better contrast and deeper blacks than in the IPS variant

  • Higher screen brightness, which improves viewing comfort during the day

  • More uniform panel, fewer problems with vignetting and lightening

  • Smooth tonal transitions, especially in bright scenes

  • Wide colour palette coverage (over 91% DCI-P3)

  • Effective upscaling of lower quality materials

  • Support for Dolby Vision, which partially enhances the experience in HDR content

  • Google TV system with a large library of applications

  • Two remotes included – a classic and a minimalist one

Disadvantages

No like
  • Google TV can operate with minor stutters

  • No USB recording and PiP functionality

  • Much worse viewing angles than in the version with an IPS panel

  • Collaboration with PC clearly weaker: worse font readability and noticeable dithering

  • Occasional stuttering of the Google TV system

  • No USB recording function

Our verdict

There are televisions that come for testing, and you immediately think: “oh, just another average one, probably like many others.” And basically… that’s true. The TCL C7K doesn’t try to dethrone OLEDs, nor does it shout from the box “revolution!” Yet, after a few days of testing, it’s hard not to think: “wow, this is really good equipment.” And that’s exactly what the C7K is. The biggest asset of the C7K is its decent picture at a reasonable price – MiniLED and quantum dots do their job here. The colours are vibrant, the brightness satisfactory, the contrast impressive, and with the right settings, you can truly enjoy viewing in the best quality. The second strong point is the smoothness of motion – both in sports and games. Support for HDMI 2.1, variable refresh rates, 144 Hz, and a whole host of other features make gaming on this TV a pure joy. Then there’s Google TV, which – despite some minor shortcomings – provides access to nearly an endless library of applications. Voice control, quick access to YouTube, Netflix, AirPlay support – it has everything you need for everyday use. Are there downsides? Of course. The Google TV system can have moments of “hesitation,” and MiniLED – being MiniLED – can stumble on very complex film scenes. But these are details. After all, the C7K is a mid-range model – and in this class, it performs simply excellently. So if you are looking for a reasonably priced, modern television with Google TV that looks good, works well, and plays quite decently without ruining your budget – the TCL C7K definitely deserves your attention.

Sony Bravia 3 in the VA panel variant is a television that, in terms of character, remains the same budget model, but the change in panel type makes watching films and series significantly more enjoyable. The higher contrast and deeper blacks finally allow for evening viewing without the impression that the screen is drowning in shades of grey. This is a considerable advantage over the IPS version, even if it comes at the expense of much worse viewing angles. In practice, it comes down to choice – if we primarily watch from a sofa positioned directly in front, the VA panel offers a decidedly better effect. The rest of the picture remains largely the same. The PFS filter still provides pleasantly saturated colours, and the upscaling is at a good level, resulting in SDR content looking clean and aesthetic. The Google TV system, although it doesn’t always run perfectly smoothly, remains a huge asset – access to a wide library of apps and streaming platforms is something that competitors in this price range do not always offer in such a polished form. At the same time, the Bravia 3 with VA does not solve all the issues of its predecessor. The HDR brightness of around 350 nits still does not allow for a true high dynamic range effect, and the lack of local dimming means that fine details can still be overexposed. Additionally, there is no USB recording, which was present in the predecessor. So, who is the Bravia 3 in the VA version for? It is for those who want to enter the world of Sony televisions at a lower cost and care about decent quality in films and series, primarily watching lower quality content. It is not a proposal for gamers or for someone expecting cinematic HDR effects. Similar to the IPS version, it is hard to speak of a bargain – even if it is the “cheapest Sony of 2025,” it remains more expensive than competitors who can offer Mini-LEDs with clearly better contrast and brightness at the same price. Therefore, it is worth considering this model primarily when we come across an attractive promotion.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
stand-type-
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Two remote controls, Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.1/10

5.7/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 336 (14 x 24)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Contrast and black detail

Result

161,000:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Contrast and black detail

Result

18,750:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Contrast and black detail

Result

13,150:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,250:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,050:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Contrast and black detail
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Contrast and black detail
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

The 50-inch TCL C7K that we tested surprised us right from the start – it’s the smallest model in the series, yet it comes equipped with a VA panel with MiniLED backlighting and – attention – as many as 336 dimming zones. For comparison: many significantly larger televisions from higher tiers would be eager to boast such a number. Here we have it in the 50-inch version. Sounds promising, doesn’t it? So how does this translate into real movie-watching experiences? In the vast majority of tested scenes – very well. The contrast was high enough that it reached even six-digit values in measurements, which practically means very deep blacks and well-separated highlights. In scenes from films like The Revenant or Oblivion, the effect was impressive, matching the best LCD screens in this class.

However, not everything went perfectly. Despite the impressive number of zones, managing them was not always exemplary. In more complex scenes, where small light sources or a high level of detail appeared, the television had issues with the so-called halo effect (a glowing halo around bright objects) or overly aggressive dimming of the image. In such situations, contrast could either collapse due to overexposure of certain zones or, conversely – details in bright areas disappeared because the zones suppressed the light too much. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that in the vast majority of scenes, the contrast was more than satisfactory. And taking into account the size of the television and the price, the final effect will satisfy not just average users.

The biggest difference in the 50-inch variant is the way the Bravia 3 handles contrast. Although the television is not equipped with a local dimming system, the very change of the matrix type to VA provides a noticeable effect. The contrast is definitely higher than in the other sizes based on IPS panels, and the black no longer resembles faded shades of grey or navy. As a result, much more detail is visible in the darker parts of the image, making evening viewing simply more enjoyable. It's still not on the level of the more expensive Sony models, but the difference compared to the other variants of the Bravia 3 is clear and easily noticeable after just a short viewing session.

HDR effect quality

5.4/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.1%, Bt.2020: 72.9%
DCI P3: 91.9%, Bt.2020: 67.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Brightness measurement

Result

1051 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Brightness measurement

Result

185 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Brightness measurement

Result

454 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Brightness measurement

Result

200 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Brightness measurement

Result

836 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

319 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

360 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

393 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

365 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

395 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review TCL C7K / QM7K HDR effect quality
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review TCL C7K / QM7K HDR effect quality
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K HDR effect quality
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) HDR effect quality

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review TCL C7K / QM7K HDR effect quality
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA)

HDR luminance

TCL C7K / QM7K

HDR luminance

TCL C7K is one of the brightest MiniLED televisions in its price range. Under the best testing conditions, the screen managed to achieve over 1200 nits, resulting in impressive, at times almost blindingly bright scenes. And most importantly – this is not just a theory based on measurements. In practice, the brightest parts of films can shine with true cinematic grandeur. Fans of home HDR cinema should be truly satisfied.

The impression is excellent, especially in scenes with large areas of brightness – a white sky, explosions, sun reflections, or magical sunsets can surprise with an intensity of light that is rarely seen in this price range.

However, it gets a bit worse when more challenging scenarios appear on the screen, as described when discussing contrast – that is, images full of details, with small, bright elements on a dark background. In such cases, the C7K often decides to preserve black levels at the expense of brightness. An example? Scenes from the films Sicario 2 or Life of Pi, where small light sources (like a distant lantern) can become less visible, and details in the lights are simply dimmed or blend into the background.

For many viewers, this may be an acceptable compromise – as we achieve deep black levels and a pleasing plasticity of the image. Nevertheless, it is worth being aware that the visibility of small details in bright areas is not this model's strongest suit. It is simply a technological limitation that still exists – even with over 300 zones.

Interestingly, the 50-inch version of the Bravia 3 performs slightly better in terms of brightness than its larger variants. In measurements, it achieved around 370 nits, which still does not compete with top-tier televisions, but is sufficient to suggest a semblance of HDR effect. For some users, this level will be acceptable, while others will view it as typical for SDR content, where striking highlights or strong contrasts are not expected. It must be clearly stated that the Bravia 3 is not a television for those looking to extract the maximum quality from the most challenging film materials.

This does not mean, however, that everything performs averagely. Sony has equipped this model with an additional PFS filter, which works similarly to solutions used in QLED televisions. As a result, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut has increased to over 91 percent. In everyday use, this means more vivid, saturated colours and also a more pleasing image texture. Even though it lacks strong lighting effects, films and series can look significantly more appealing than with its predecessor, the X75WL.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.8/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Factory color reproduction
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Factory color reproduction
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the long-awaited Filmmaker mode, which until now has been found in most competing brands. This is great news, as this mode is considered to be the truest to the original vision of the creators and is often recommended by enthusiasts of good picture quality. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the mere presence of this mode does not guarantee perfection. The Filmmaker mode in the TCL C7K is not without its flaws. There can be criticism of the incorrect white balance, particularly a slight dominance of blue, which resulted in cool, somewhat greyish skin tones. But that was not the biggest issue. The main complaint was the excessive brightness exposure, which is clearly visible on the gamma and EOTF graphs. The image was simply too bright, at times even blown out, which affected not only the texture of scenes but also the overall viewing experience. Some details were simply lost, and the entire image looked as if someone had slightly overcooked the brightness slider. As always, we decided to check what could be extracted from this after calibration. And that’s where it started to get really interesting…

Sony Bravia 3 was primarily tested in film mode, which immediately proved to be the best choice among the factory settings. It is not an ideal picture, but compared to the eco mode that the television offers right out of the box, the difference is clear and it is a positive one. In film mode, one can notice a certain issue: the image appears too warm, which results from the lack of blue in the white balance. Nevertheless, in SDR content, the final effect can still be regarded as quite decent and satisfying for everyday viewing. Much more serious errors occur in HDR materials. The Color Checker analysis showed significant deviations, and poor brightness management, combined with limited colour gamut coverage, further exposes the shortcomings of the image in this mode. All of this means that HDR in the Bravia 3 edition is unconvincing and can spoil the impression left by a quite decent SDR content setup. Fortunately, this is not a hopeless situation. Various errors can be mitigated to some extent, and some can even be completely corrected through professional calibration. Therefore, we decided to check how the television would perform after such adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7.5/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Color reproduction after calibration
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Color reproduction after calibration
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, the TCL C7K showcased itself in a really good light, especially when it comes to SDR content. We managed to precisely tune the white balance, colour gamut, and brightness characteristics to the point that colour errors on the ColorChecker palette dropped below a value of 2. For the uninitiated – this is nearly a perfect result, which means that the image is very close to what the creators intended. Unfortunately, the situation was worse with 4K HDR content. Although we managed to gently stabilize the white balance and correct its previous errors, it was still evident that the television has certain "MiniLED traits," especially in brightness management. When we checked how the C7K handled the EOTF curve on actual film scenes, rather than just on synthetic test patterns, it turned out that the screen still tends to slightly brighten the entire image. This impacts the overall experience – blacks lose some depth, and the image becomes less contrasty than it should be. Despite these minor shortcomings in HDR content, the overall reception of materials – especially in SDR – is truly very good. After calibration, the C7K can display an image that can compete successfully with much more expensive models. Good colour tuning, natural skin tones, and pleasant brightness make movie sessions and everyday viewing of content more than satisfactory.

Calibration allowed us to extract significantly more from the ChooseTV 3 than we could have expected at first. Firstly, it was possible to address the lack of blue, which had previously caused a noticeable warming of the image. After a slight adjustment to the white balance, most of the errors in the Color Checker measurements for SDR content practically disappeared. The shades of white became more natural, and the brightness management in gamma stabilised to a nearly perfect level, not exceeding the threshold of human eye perception. Therefore, it can confidently be said that in SDR content, after a few adjustments in settings, the ChooseTV 3 performs really brilliantly. Much worse, although still definitely better than before calibration, are the HDR contents. The white balance was brought into order, but the limitations of the IPS panel are insurmountable. The lack of local dimming means that even the smallest elements can be overexposed, which is immediately noticeable. Colour-wise, the effect is also improved, although far from ideal – many errors still exceed the threshold of four, or even five delta E units, meaning they remain visible to the human eye. It was already clear earlier that the ChooseTV 3 is not a television designed to impress with HDR quality. Nonetheless, it is pleasing to note that in SDR content, after calibration, the image can look truly excellent, and in this category, the television positively surprised us.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.6/10

9.1/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions

The TCL C7K handles colour gradation very well – in most of the tested scenes, tonal transitions were smooth, and colours blended together without visible outlines or the artificial "blot" effect. In everyday use, it's hard to find anything to criticise – the picture looks natural, without annoying transitions or digital artifacts. Certain limitations only arise in very dark tones – particularly in a heavily muted grey palette, where the television may struggle to reproduce the ideal gradation. But this is absolutely understandable, as even many significantly more expensive models in this regard simply falter. Fortunately, these situations are rare and do not significantly impact the overall impression.

In terms of the fluidity of tonal transitions, the experience with the Bravia 3 featuring a VA panel is very similar to what we observed in the IPS variant; however, there is one significant factor here – screen uniformity. The VA panel performs significantly better in maintaining image consistency, which immediately translates into a higher rating. This was most easily noticeable in scenes from the film Green Knight. In the IPS version, strong brightening and vignetting practically prevented a proper assessment of the gradation itself, whereas in the 50-inch variant, this issue has been greatly reduced. As for the tonal transitions themselves, the television performs really well. In bright parts of the image, we did not notice any serious errors – the colours blend smoothly without creating artificial contours. In darker scenes, there are also no major issues with colour gradation, and thanks to the more uniform backlighting, the image is considerably more pleasant to view than in the version with the IPS panel. Therefore, it can be said that this is one of those categories in which the Bravia 3 in the 50-inch version performs surprisingly well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review TCL C7K / QM7K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

TCL C7K is equipped with a feature that, according to the manufacturer, is meant to smooth out unwanted colour transitions – a sort of rescue for less successful tonal shifts. It is called "Gradual Smoothing" and… well, it sounds ambitious, but in practice it works very poorly. Regardless of whether we set it to a low or high level, the difference is minimal. Worst of all, the feature can cut out elements from the picture that should be there. Fortunately, film grain remains untouched, so at least it doesn’t smooth everything indiscriminately, but still – it’s better to simply turn this option off.

When it comes to scaling lower resolution content, it is somewhat better. SD and HD materials look quite decent, although at times we had the impression that the image loses sharpness and becomes too soft – as if something took away its definition. Fortunately, with very low sources (e.g. 576p), there was no overscan effect, meaning the picture was not artificially cropped – everything fit on the screen as it should.

Bravia 3 brings something more than just a shared name to the Sony television family. It stands out primarily for its ability to enhance the quality of inferior materials thanks to the processor used. Of course, we won't find the advanced XR chip known from more expensive models here, but nevertheless, it's worth noting that the image at lower resolutions looked surprisingly good. The upscaling worked effectively, and most parts of the screen were free from the typical excessive edge tearing characteristic of budget constructions. The feature enhancing the smoothness of tonal transitions is also noteworthy. In the high setting, it performs really well, effectively masking gradation imperfections without significant loss of detail. It does happen, however, that the algorithm overly smooths elements that should remain sharp – for example, faces – but overall, the effect is beneficial. The best results were achieved precisely at the highest setting, and this option could be recommended to those watching lower-quality content.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.1/10

4.8/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 120Hz
No
Brightness drop with BFI
24%
26%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K 144Hz):

Blur ():

The TCL C7K handles motion fluidity really very well. The matrix used in it offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which in itself suggests that this television is more than just a regular "60 Hz" panel. Furthermore – if we connect the C7K to a computer and set the resolution to Full HD. But we'll write more about this in the paragraph about gamers and PC collaboration. Returning to everyday use – both sports and films look very good here. Thanks to the fast panel and well-functioning motion smoothing, the C7K is great for watching matches, but also for movie screenings. In the menu, we find two sliders – motion blur reduction and flicker reduction – which allow us to adjust the fluidity effect to our own preferences. At lower settings, we get a more cinematic effect, with slight stuttering motion. At higher settings – the picture becomes more theatrical, fluid to the point of excess. Everyone has their own preferences – anyone can set it to their liking.

The fluidity of motion has never been a strong point of televisions equipped with 60 Hz panels, and the Bravia 3 is no exception. Nevertheless, Sony has added something that may appeal to those more sensitive to the way images are displayed. This refers to the proprietary motion smoother, Motion Flow, which offers users a considerable amount of adjustment options. With it, one can make the image smoother, even theatrical, or stick to a more cinematic style with the characteristic judder that many associate with a filmic atmosphere. These functions work with content shot at lower frame rates, such as films and series recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second, which is the kind of material we encounter daily. It is precisely at this point that the motion smoother turns out to be one of the most important features in everyday use of the television, and here the Bravia 3 performs quite well.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The TCL C7K is a television that on paper appears to be the dream equipment for gamers – and most importantly, it holds up in practice too. To start with good news: there are two full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, so we can easily connect both a console and a computer, taking advantage of all their capabilities. The panel itself supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which gives a significant advantage in dynamic games. There is also a complete set of gaming features: VRR (variable refresh rate), ALLM (automatic low-latency mode), and support for Dolby Vision in games. There is also the HGiG mode, which allows for HDR effects consistent with the creators' intentions. GameBar, an information bar for gamers. It works quickly, looks clear (like a Nintendo console👌), and shows what matters most: the current frame rate, VRR status, and even HDR parameters.

Bravia 3 is not a device for e-sports enthusiasts or fans of late-night marathons with a controller in hand. The lack of 120 Hz refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 ports puts an end to that discussion before it can even begin. This is a television for casual gamers who, after work, will fire up FIFA or racing games, not for someone who measures every frame in a spreadsheet. Nevertheless, Sony has included a few nice extras so that it isn't all so bare. ALLM works as it should, automatically switching the television to game mode (low latency). There's even a simple Game Bar, which is clear and straightforward. However, the biggest curiosity here is the PlayStation Portal app. Thanks to it, you can launch games from the PS5 wirelessly and see them immediately on the television screen. It sounds great, but it only takes a few minutes to feel significant delays. In our opinion, it is more of a showcase of capabilities than something you can use on a daily basis. If someone really wants to play, it is better to connect the console with an HDMI cable and forget about wireless issues.

Input lag

9.7/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
19 ms
12 ms
1080p120
11 ms
2160p60
19 ms
12 ms
2160p120
11 ms

HDR

2160p60
19 ms
11 ms
2160p120
10 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
19 ms
12 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

When it comes to delays, the C7K gives no reason for complaints. In games at 120 Hz, input lag is around 10 ms, which means the television responds really quickly. And interestingly – even in Dolby Vision mode, the result is very similar, which is not always the standard. Good job, TCL. At 60 Hz, the lag does increase a bit, but that's completely normal and affects virtually every television with a refresh rate of 120Hz and above. The most important thing is that everything still runs smoothly and there’s no feeling that something is not responding to our actions.

Here, the Bravia 3 showcases its best side. Latencies drop below 12 milliseconds in almost every resolution and mode, so the response to controller movements is instantaneous and there is no feeling of delay. The impression is that the console and the television are speaking the same language, without unnecessary stops and hesitations. The Dolby Vision Gaming mode deserves special attention. In its predecessor, the X75WL model, using this feature was simply a torment – input lag could reach over 100 milliseconds, which effectively took away the enjoyment of gaming. In the Bravia 3, this problem has been completely eliminated.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

3.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
11ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Compatibility with PC
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Compatibility with PC

If we are going to connect the C7K to a computer – especially for gaming – there is definitely a lot to play for. We have 4K at 144 Hz, which already sounds great, but if we lower the resolution, the television can even display up to 280 Hz. In e-sports, where every fraction of a second counts, this really makes a difference. On top of that, there is support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so regardless of which graphics card we have – the image will be smooth, without any stuttering or tearing.

However, if we plan to place the C7K on a desk and use it like a monitor, it’s a bit less "rosy." Yes, it supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts should be sharp, but with very dark letters, there is slight blurriness and dimming of the edges. This is not something that immediately stands out during gaming or watching, but when working with text – it can be distracting. In everyday use – it’s probably nothing to worry about, but if we plan to place a 50-inch screen a meter from our face, it’s worth keeping this in mind.

Collaboration with a computer in the case of Bravia 3 with a VA panel does not perform as well as in the version with an IPS panel. The fonts are clearly less sharp and harder to read, which is immediately noticeable when working with text. Additionally, there is the surprising issue of dithering, which we did not notice in the IPS variant. This is quite an unusual situation, but definitely worth noting, as it may bother those planning to use the television as a monitor. As for PC gaming, there is also not much cause for enthusiasm here. The lack of support for frame synchronization with graphics cards or higher refresh rates makes the screen quite unattractive in this role. Therefore, if someone is seriously considering connecting the Bravia 3 to a computer, the better choice would be the version with an IPS panel, which performs significantly better in this regard.

Viewing angles

3/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
75%
73%

There are no surprises here – the C7K has classic viewing angles for a VA panel. That is: sitting directly in front – it’s excellent. The colours look good, the contrast is strong, everything is in place. But just shifting slightly to the side and it starts to get worse – the image loses saturation, blacks turn grey, and the overall impression diminishes a bit. So, if we plan to watch together with a few people or have a sofa that takes up half the living room – it’s worth seating everyone a bit more centrally. You can watch from the side, but don’t expect miracles – it’s simply a characteristic of VA panels.

The viewing angles in the Bravia 3 with a VA panel are noticeably weaker than in the version with an IPS panel. It is enough to sit slightly to the side for the image to begin to lose its saturation and clarity, and the black starts to take on a lighter shade. This is the natural price one has to pay for the significantly better contrast and deeper black, which are a clear advantage in this variant.

Daytime performance

6.1/10

5.4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Daytime performance
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Daytime performance
Review TCL C7K / QM7K Daytime performance
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA): 397 cd/m2

TCL C7K / QM7K: 475 cd/m2

Fortunately, the TCL C7K performs quite well in bright rooms. The applied panel has a satin finish that effectively suppresses reflections, which means we don't have to worry about lamp or window reflections even on sunny days. Importantly, the colours maintain their intensity and do not wash out, as can happen with weaker matte panels. In terms of brightness, the average for content like YouTube or regular television is slightly below 500 nits. This is not a record-breaking result – for example, the MQLED85 (C765) performs better in this regard. However, for everyday viewing during the day, it should work without major issues, provided we do not plan to place it opposite a south-facing window without curtains.

The performance of the Bravia 3 in the VA variant during the day is a mix of pros and cons. The manufacturer has also applied a satin coating here, but compared to IPS, it struggles more with direct reflections. When sharp light hits the screen, reflections can be more pronounced and may interfere with viewing. On the other hand, the television makes up for this with higher brightness. In typical daylight conditions, the image is more readable and clearer than in the version with the IPS panel. As a result, in everyday use, the Bravia 3 in the VA edition can perform even better, provided it is not placed in a heavily sunlit location.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V8.0012T01-LF1V531.002396
6120600301
Image processor
MT5896 2,5GB RAM
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV Panel details
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV Panel details

TV features

7.3/10

6.1/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features

SmartTV: GoogleTV

The greatest strength of the TCL C7K in everyday use is undoubtedly the Google TV system. Thanks to it, we have access to an almost endless library of applications, including some more niche ones that are often unavailable on other platforms. The built-in Google Assistant understands Polish, so we can easily ask what’s on TV, what the weather is like, and even issue a few voice commands to control the television. The presence of Chromecast and AirPlay, which work smoothly and make life easier, is also a plus.

User Functions

On the downside, the classic features are somewhat lacking. Of course, we have the basics – teletext, EPG, and the ability to connect headphones – but that’s about it. There is no USB recording feature or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, which can still be found among competitors. It’s also worth remembering that Google TV in the TCL edition can sometimes have strangely translated parts of the menu or minor errors in the interface. These are not things that interfere with daily use, but those sensitive to details may notice them.

Smart TV Features

The greatest advantage of the Bravia 3 in everyday use is the presence of the Google TV system. It is thanks to this that we have access to one of the largest libraries of applications and streaming services, so regardless of whether someone mainly uses Netflix, Disney+ or smaller platforms, everything is within easy reach. The Google voice assistant also worked very well, responding to our commands quite "smartly". The Google TV system should theoretically operate very smoothly, as Sony has been implementing it better than many cheaper competitors for years. Unfortunately, in the case of the Bravia 3, it is not as great as we would expect. During tests, we noticed slight stutters in the interface, and some functions, such as screen mirroring, simply refused to work. One might get the impression that the processor in this model sometimes struggles to cope with the demanding system, and not everything works as smoothly as we would hope.

Classic Features

Even in the cheapest series, Sony manages to remind us of its experience with various users. The set includes two remote controls. The first is modern and minimalist, with a small number of buttons, which works great for using applications and Google TV functions. The second is a classic remote with a more extensive set of buttons and a numerical keypad, which will be especially appreciated by older individuals accustomed to traditional solutions. This is a nice gesture towards different user groups, and it must be said that Sony has solved this very practically. It is a pity, however, that compared to the X75WL model, the ability to record content from television tuners to USB memory has disappeared. The manufacturer has completely abandoned this feature, so anyone attached to it will unfortunately not find it in the Bravia 3.

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

9.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in file player in the TCL C7K performs really very well. It supports most of the most popular audio and video formats, so if we want to quickly plug something in from a USB drive and play it – there should be no problem. Of course, as is usually the case, we can find some minor shortcomings – not every exotic codec will work (Apple's HEIC), not all subtitles will be perfectly synchronised (txt.). However, the biggest advantage of this television comes to the rescue, namely Google TV. Thanks to access to the Google Play store, we can easily install an alternative player, e.g. VLC, and then no files will be a concern for us.

Here Sony has done a really good job. The built-in player works quickly and doesn't "grumble" when launching different formats. We didn't have to reach for external applications like VLC, as the television handled even files that can cause quite a few issues on other models – such as HEIC photos from Apple devices. It's a little thing, but one that shows the manufacturer wanted the user to feel complete convenience. By plugging in a film on a USB drive or holiday photos on an external hard drive, you can simply connect them and watch right away on the big screen. No fuss, no installing additional software, no searching for workarounds. It's truly a rarity in televisions, and we must admit that in this aspect the Bravia 3 really surprised us pleasantly.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    76dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

To be honest, we didn’t expect much from the sound of the 50-inch version of the C7K model. Typically, in such sizes, it’s hard to get anything more than thin, flat sound. But here – a pleasant surprise. The audio proved to be really enjoyable, with good clarity and even a slightly discernible bass. This is probably related to TCL's new collaboration with the Bang & Olufsen brand, which is a novelty for 2025. Whether the C7K actually uses the original transducers from the Danish premium brand – we cannot confirm. But the end result still deserves a thumbs up. For a television without a soundbar – it sounds quite pleasant.

Bravia 3 plays in quite a flat manner, but makes up for it with volume. It's perfect for watching classic television, as the dialogues are clear and the mid-tones are well audible. Older users, who primarily care about speech intelligibility, will particularly appreciate this type of characteristic. However, if someone expects something more from the sound, such as stronger bass or a wider soundstage, it is still worth reaching for a soundbar. The television supports modern codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, so an external sound system can easily utilise their potential. This ensures that with relatively little expenditure, one can achieve a much fuller and more engaging sound.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

76dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data