TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" vs SONY BRAVIA 3

Direct compare

C7K / Q7C / MQLED85K / C79K / C71K / QM7K

Info

BRAVIA 3 / K-(XX)S3

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.4

6.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.2

    5.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.9

    5.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    5.7

  • Gaming on console

    8.7

    6.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.4

    4.9

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.7

    6.5

Advantages

  • Very good black - VA panel with a large number of Mini-LED zones

  • High brightness in HDR - over 1000 nits

  • Great for gamers - HDMI 2.1, low input lag, VRR, ALLM, etc.

  • Good motion smoothness - 144Hz panel

  • Supports multiple HDR formats: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision

  • Google TV operating system with access to a vast application base

  • Pleasant sound from built-in speakers (6.2.2) Bang & Olufsen

  • Google TV system – a vast library of apps and services

  • IPS panel with good viewing angles

  • Enhanced colours – (91% DCI-P3 colour gamut)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • Good upscaling – lower quality materials look surprisingly good

  • Excellent input lag and ALLM mode

  • Very good PC compatibility – supports 4:4:4 chroma, excellent font readability

  • Two remote controls included – modern minimalist and classic with a numeric keypad

  • Very good built-in media player – supports a wide range of files, even less common ones like HEIC

  • Thin bezels and modern design – a significant step forward compared to X75WL

  • Supports Dolby Atmos and DTS:X

Disadvantages

No like
  • Google TV can work with minor stutters

  • No USB recording and PiP function

  • Tragic black - IPS matrix without local dimming

  • Limited brightness (approx. 350 nits), the image in HDR mode is not very appealing

  • Issues with backlight uniformity

  • The Google TV system can stutter

  • Lack of recording function from built-in tuners to USB memory

Our verdict

There are televisions that come in for testing and at first glance seem like just another "average" model. The TCL C7K looks just that way – without grand claims of revolution, without ambitions to dethrone OLEDs. Yet after spending a few days with this model, it's hard not to conclude that it's actually a well-made product. Its greatest strengths? Very good picture quality at a reasonable price. MiniLED combined with QLED filtering provides vibrant colours, high brightness, and contrast that really impresses in this class. Motion in sports or gaming looks smooth, and the presence of HDMI 2.1 and 144 Hz refresh rate makes gaming on this model a pure delight. Additionally, there's the Google TV system – it offers a vast range of possibilities: from voice control to AirPlay support, and access to all the most important applications.

Are there any drawbacks? Certainly. MiniLED still has its limitations, and in the most challenging cinematic scenes, compromises in dimming can be noticed. Google TV also doesn't always run perfectly smoothly. However, these are rather minor issues that don't overshadow the overall picture – which is indeed very positive. It's also worth highlighting the difference between versions. The 50-inch version we tested can surprise, but the 55–85 inch models perform significantly better – they have more lighting zones, even higher contrast quality, and better sound. So if you're considering purchasing the C7K, it's definitely worth opting for a larger size.

Sony Bravia 3 is a television that brings several important improvements over its predecessor, while remaining true to its core. The biggest change is the design – slim bezels and sturdy metal legs give it a modern appearance that fits much better in a living room than the X75WL. Improved colours thanks to the PFS filter and really good upscaling should also be noted. It is particularly in lower quality content, especially in classic SDR, that the Bravia 3 shows its best side – colours look pleasing, the image is clear, and thanks to the IPS panel, viewing angles are at a very good level. It is perfectly suited for the role of a “classic” television receiver, where the convenience of watching from different spots in the room and decent quality of everyday content matter. A huge advantage remains the Google TV system. During our tests, there were times when the interface did not always work as smoothly as we would have liked, and some features could freeze. However, despite these imperfections, the presence of Google TV is a significant plus – access to thousands of applications and a full streaming library compensates for minor shortcomings. Unfortunately, what was weak in the X75WL remains weak here as well. The IPS panel has very low contrast and does not offer local dimming, making watching films in a dark room quickly lose its appeal – black resembles grey and effectively detracts from the enjoyment of the viewing experience. Additionally, the option to record content to USB, which was available in its predecessor, has been dropped. It is hard not to notice this and not add it to the list of downsides.

So who is the Bravia 3 for? Primarily for those looking to enter the world of Sony televisions at a potentially low price and who also appreciate the Google TV system. However, it is not the most attractive option in its class – competitors in this budget can offer models with Mini-LED backlighting, whose images perform several times better in terms of contrast and HDR. Therefore, the Bravia 3 is worth keeping in mind, but mainly when a solid discount is available. At regular price, it will be very difficult to stand out against its more cost-effective rivals.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel colour
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Two remote controls, Stand

Contrast and black detail

8.1/10

2.2/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1008 (42 x 24)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

256,000:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

59,850:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

22,200:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

11,400:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,150:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,150:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Contrast and black detail

The results of black and contrast tests in models ranging from 55 to 85 inches are very similar, which is why in the main part of the evaluation we refer to the 65-inch version. It is a natural phenomenon that larger sizes mean a greater number of local dimming zones, and in the case of 65 inches, we counted over 1000. The effect is very good – the contrast is at a high level and performs definitely better than in the smallest, 50-inch variant. Typical MiniLED limitations are still visible, such as the halo effect or slightly too aggressive dimming of the image, however, here they are less noticeable than in the smaller model.

For comparison, it is worth recalling that the 50-inch TCL C7K, despite surprising with the use of as many as 336 dimming zones, had difficulties managing the backlight in more complex scenes – overexposures or loss of detail occurred. In larger sizes, this problem does not completely disappear, but thanks to the greater number of zones, its impact on the perception of the image is less bothersome.

The Bravia 3 in most variants, including the 65-inch model we tested, uses an IPS panel and unfortunately, this is not the best news for those who value depth of image and true velvety blacks. This technology has its advantages, as it offers decent viewing angles, but these come at the cost of very low contrast, which is particularly noticeable during evening viewings when we expect the screen to go dark where it should. However, this is not the end of the list of problems. Our unit also exhibited noticeable unevenness in blacks, which exacerbates the effect of their shallowness. For example, in a scene with a helicopter, the blooming in the corners of the screen and pronounced vignetting are clearly visible.

It's hard not to think that even a simple local dimming system could have salvaged the situation and added a touch of drama to the image, which is lacking here. Unfortunately, Sony has decided against such a solution, and as a result, we have a repeat of last year's issues. The Bravia 3 is therefore not a television that will charm you with cinema-like black depth. At night, instead of intense blacks, we are likely to see a grey pretending to be darkness, which may disappoint more demanding viewers.

HDR effect quality

6.2/10

4.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 94.0%, Bt.2020: 73.5%
DCI P3: 91.3%, Bt.2020: 69.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

1108 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

405 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

865 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

290 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

848 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Brightness measurement

Result

316 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Brightness measurement

Result

327 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Brightness measurement

Result

369 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Brightness measurement

Result

236 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Brightness measurement

Result

379 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" HDR effect quality
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" HDR effect quality
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" HDR effect quality
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" HDR effect quality
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

SONY BRAVIA 3

HDR luminance

TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85"

HDR luminance

In terms of brightness, the models ranging from 55 to 85 inches in the C7K series are truly impressive. Under the best testing conditions, the 65-inch screen reached over 1200 nits, which in practice means that the brightest scenes can shine with almost cinematic brilliance. These are not just dry numbers from measurements – during viewings, the white skies, explosions or reflections of light on water looked extraordinarily striking, often giving the impression that the television exceeded its price class. This is particularly effective in scenes with large areas of brightness, where the screen is filled with intense light – such as in sunlit shots or during dynamic action sequences. Viewers seeking strong HDR will definitely be satisfied.

However, scenes that require precise control of the backlighting – with small points of light on a dark background – prove to be more challenging. Here, the C7K, despite having over a thousand zones, still dims the brightness to maintain deep blacks. The effect is that in films like Sicario 2 or Life of Pi, some details, like a distant lantern or single reflections, can be less distinct or blend into the surroundings. This is a compromise inherent in MiniLED technology – it provides excellent image depth and blacks at a level that ordinary LCDs do not offer, but this comes at the cost of limited visibility of the finest lights.

Bravia 3 does not hide the fact that it belongs to the group of televisions that are rather modest in terms of brightness. Our measurements showed around 370 nits, which is a value teetering on the edge of where one can still speak of any HDR effect. For some, this is an acceptable level, while for others it is rather typical for SDR content, where spectacular highlights or vivid contrasts are not expected. The impression is that this is not a television for those focused on the highest image quality in demanding cinematic content. However, this does not mean that we cannot find any advantages here. Compared to its predecessor, the X75WL, Bravia 3 has gained an additional PFS filter, which works similarly to solutions known from QLED technology. Thanks to this, the DCI-P3 colour palette has been significantly widened and reaches over 91 percent, which in practice results in more saturated colours and a more pleasing image texture. As a result, even everyday content looks somewhat livelier, and films and series can surprise with vibrant visuals, despite limitations in brightness itself.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.8/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Factory color reproduction
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Factory color reproduction
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the long-awaited Filmmaker mode, which until now could be found in most competing brands. This is great news, as this mode is considered the one that most accurately represents the original vision of the creators and is often recommended by enthusiasts of good picture quality. Unfortunately – as is often the case – the mere presence of it does not guarantee perfection. The Filmmaker mode in the TCL C7K is not without its flaws. One can point out the incorrect white balance, particularly the slight dominance of blue, which resulted in cool, somewhat greyish skin tones. But that was not the biggest issue. The main complaint was excessive brightness exposure, which was clearly visible on gamma and EOTF charts. The image was simply too bright, at times even overexposed, which affected not only the texture of the scenes but also the overall viewing experience. Some details were simply lost, and the entire image looked like someone had slightly overdone the brightness slider. As always, we decided to see what could be squeezed out of it after calibration. And that’s where it started to get really interesting…

Sony Bravia 3 was primarily tested in film mode, which immediately proved to be the best choice among the factory settings. It is not a perfect picture, but compared to the eco mode that the television offers right out of the box, the difference is clear and positive. In film mode, one can notice a certain problem: the image appears too warm, which results from a lack of blue colour in the white balance. Despite this, in SDR content, the final effect can still be considered quite decent and satisfactory for everyday viewing. Much more serious errors occur in HDR materials. The Color Checker analysis showed considerable deviations, and poor brightness management, combined with limited colour gamut coverage, further exposes the shortcomings of the image in this mode. All of this makes HDR on the Bravia 3 appear unconvincing and can spoil the impression left by the quite decent SDR content setting. Fortunately, this is not an insurmountable situation. Various errors can be somewhat mitigated, and some can even be fully corrected through professional calibration. Therefore, we decided to check how the television would perform after such adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7.5/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Color reproduction after calibration
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Color reproduction after calibration
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, the TCL C7K presented itself in a really good light, especially when it comes to SDR content. We managed to precisely tune the white balance, colour gamut, and brightness characteristics so that the colour errors on the ColorChecker palette fell below a value of 2. For the uninitiated – this is nearly a perfect result, indicating that the image closely resembles what the creators intended. Unfortunately, it looked worse with 4K HDR content. While we slightly managed to calm the white balance and correct its previous errors, it still shows that the TV has some “MiniLED traits”, particularly in brightness management. When we checked how the C7K copes with the EOTF curve on real film scenes, rather than just synthetic test patterns, it turned out that the screen still tends to slightly brighten the entire image. This affects the overall impression – the black loses some depth, and the image becomes less contrasty than it should be. Despite these minor shortcomings in HDR content, the overall reception of materials – especially in SDR – is truly very good. After calibration, the C7K is capable of displaying an image that can successfully compete with much more expensive models. Good colour tuning, natural skin tones, and pleasant brightness ensure that movie sessions and everyday content viewing are more than satisfactory.

The calibration allowed us to extract significantly more from the Bravia 3 than we could have expected at the beginning. Firstly, it managed to compensate for the deficiency of blue, which had previously caused a noticeable warming of the image. After a slight adjustment to the white balance, most of the errors in the Color Checker measurements for SDR content virtually disappeared. The white tones became more natural, and the brightness management in gamma stabilised to an almost ideal level, not exceeding the threshold of human perception. Thus, it can be confidently stated that in SDR content, after a few adjustments to the settings, the Bravia 3 performs remarkably well. Significantly worse, although still definitely better than before calibration, are HDR contents. The white balance was brought into order, however, the limitations of the IPS panel are insurmountable. The lack of local dimming means that even the smallest elements can be overexposed, which immediately stands out. Colour-wise, the effect is also improved, though far from perfect – many errors still exceed the threshold of four or even five delta E units, meaning they remain visible to the human eye. It was already clear earlier that the Bravia 3 is not a television designed to impress with HDR quality. Nevertheless, it is gratifying that in SDR content, after calibration, the image can look truly excellent, and in this category, the television pleasantly surprised us.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.6/10

8/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Smoothness of tonal transitions

TCL C7K performs very well with colour gradation – in most of the tested scenes, the tonal transitions were smooth, and the colours blended together without visible outlines or the artificial effect of “blobs”. In everyday use, it is difficult to find fault with anything – the picture looks natural, without irritating transitions or digital artefacts. Certain limitations only appear in very dark tones – particularly in a heavily muted grey palette, where the television may struggle to reproduce an ideal gradation. But this is absolutely understandable, as even many significantly more expensive models in this range simply falter. Fortunately, these situations are rare and do not significantly affect the overall impression.

In terms of the fluidity of tonal transitions, the Bravia 3 performs really well. In brighter scenes, we did not notice any significant errors – the screen handles the blending of colours almost flawlessly and does not create artificial contours that can spoil the viewing experience. Similarly, in darker segments, there are no major issues with colour gradation, although another problem arises here. Strong brightening and uneven backlighting of the panel in dark scenes make it difficult to assess the gradation itself clearly, as the effect is spoiled by the unevenness of the image. However, when we focus solely on the blending of colours, the result should be considered very good.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The TCL C7K features a function that, according to the manufacturer, is designed to smooth out unwanted colour transitions – a sort of rescue for less successful tonal shifts. It's called "Gradual Smoothing" and... well, it sounds ambitious, but in practice, it works very poorly. Regardless of whether we set it to low or high, the difference is minimal. What's worse, the function can cut out elements from the image that should remain. Fortunately, the film grain remains untouched, so at least it doesn't smooth everything indiscriminately, but still – it's better to simply turn this option off.

When it comes to scaling lower resolution content, it’s much better. SD and HD materials look quite decent, although at times we had the impression that the image was losing sharpness and becoming too soft – as if something was detracting from its clarity. Fortunately, with very low sources (e.g. 576p), there was no overscan effect, meaning the image was not artificially cropped – everything fit on the screen as it should.

Bravia 3 brings something more to the Sony TV family than just a shared name. It stands out primarily for its ability to enhance the quality of weaker materials thanks to the processor used. Of course, we won’t find the advanced XR chip known from more expensive models here, but even so, it must be admitted that the image in lower resolutions looked surprisingly good. The scaling worked effectively, and most parts of the screen were free from the typical excessive edge tearing found in budget constructions.

Attention should also be paid to the function that improves the smoothness of tonal transitions. In the high setting, it works really well, effectively masking gradation imperfections without significant detail loss. It does happen, however, that the algorithm overly smooths elements that should remain sharp – for example, faces – but overall, the effect is beneficial. The best results were achieved precisely at the highest setting, and this option could be recommended to those watching lower quality content.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.1/10

5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 120Hz
No
Brightness drop with BFI
31%
22%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

Smużenie ():

The TCL C7K handles motion smoothness really very well. The matrix used in it offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which in itself suggests that this television is something more than a regular "60 Hz" panel. What's more – if we connect the C7K to a computer and set the resolution to Full HD. But we will write more about this in the section for gamers and cooperation with PCs. Returning to everyday use – both sports and films look very good here. Thanks to the fast panel and well-functioning motion smoother, the C7K is great for watching matches, as well as for film screenings. In the menu, we find two sliders – blur reduction and flicker reduction – which allow you to adjust the smoothness effect to your own preferences. At lower settings, we get a more cinematic effect, with a slight choppy motion. At higher settings – the image becomes more theatrical, overly smooth. Everyone can set it to their liking.

The fluidity of motion has never been a strong point of televisions equipped with 60 Hz panels, and the Bravia 3 is no exception. Nevertheless, Sony has added something that may appeal to those more sensitive to the way images are displayed. We are talking about the proprietary motion smoother, Motion Flow, which offers users a considerable range of adjustment options. Thanks to it, one can make the image smoother, even theatrical, or stick to a more cinematic style with the characteristic judder that many simply associate with the filmic atmosphere. These functions work with content at lower frame rates, such as films and series recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second, which are the materials we encounter on a daily basis. It is here that the motion smoother proves to be one of the most important features in everyday use of the television, and this is where the Bravia 3 performs quite well.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The TCL C7K is a television that on paper appears to be the dream equipment for gamers – and most importantly, it also holds up in practice. To start with the good news: there are two full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, so we can easily connect both a console and a computer, making full use of their capabilities. The panel itself supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which provides a significant advantage in fast-paced games. Additionally, it comes with a complete set of gaming features: VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), and support for Dolby Vision in games. There is also an HGiG mode that allows for an HDR effect in line with the creators' intentions. GameBar, which is an information bar for gamers. It works quickly, looks clear (like a Nintendo console👌), and shows the most important information: the current frame rate, VRR status, and even HDR parameters.

Bravia 3 is not equipment for e-sports enthusiasts or fans of night marathons with a controller in hand. The lack of 120 Hz refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 ports closes the topic before it even has a chance to develop. This is a television for casual gamers who will play FIFA or racing games after work, not for someone who measures every frame in a spreadsheet. Nevertheless, Sony has added a few nice extras to ensure it’s not too sparse. ALLM works as it should, automatically switching the television to game mode (low latency). There’s even a simple Game Bar, which is clear. However, the biggest novelty here is the PlayStation Portal app. Thanks to it, you can launch PS5 games wirelessly and view them immediately on the television screen. It sounds great, but just a few minutes is enough to feel significant lag. In our opinion, it’s more of a showcase of capabilities than something that can be used every day. If someone really wants to play, it’s better to connect the console via HDMI cable and forget about wireless issues.

Input lag

9.6/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
12 ms
1080p120
12 ms
2160p60
18 ms
12 ms
2160p120
12 ms

HDR

2160p60
18 ms
11 ms
2160p120
12 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
18 ms
11 ms
2160p120 DV
12 ms

When it comes to delays, the C7K gives no reason to complain. In games at 120 Hz, the input lag is around 10 ms, meaning the television responds really quickly. Interestingly, even in Dolby Vision mode, the result is very similar, which is not always the standard. Well done, TCL. At 60 Hz, the lag obviously increases a bit, but that's completely normal and applies to practically every television with a 120 Hz refresh rate or higher. The most important thing is that everything still runs smoothly and there is no sense that something is not responding to our actions.

Here, the Bravia 3 shows its best side. Latencies drop below 12 milliseconds in almost every resolution and mode, so the response to controller movements is instantaneous and there is no feeling of delay. It feels as though the console and the television are speaking the same language, without unnecessary pauses or hesitations. The Dolby Vision Gaming mode is particularly noteworthy. In its predecessor, the X75WL model, using this feature was simply a pain – input lag could exceed 100 milliseconds, which effectively spoiled the enjoyment of gaming. In the Bravia 3, this issue has been completely eliminated.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Compatibility with PC
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 Compatibility with PC

If we intend to connect the C7K to a computer – especially for gaming – there is really a lot to play for. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, which sounds great in itself, but if we lower the resolution, the TV can display even 280 Hz. In e-sports, where every fraction of a second counts, that really makes a difference. Added to this is support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so no matter what graphics card we have – the image will be smooth, without any stutters or tearing.

However, if we plan to place the C7K on a desk and use it like a monitor, it’s a bit less "rosy". True, it supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts should be sharp, but with very dark letters, there is a slight blurring and dimming of edges. This is not something that immediately jumps out at you during gaming or watching, but when working with text – it can be distracting. In everyday use – rather without concern, but if we plan to place 50 inches a metre from our face, it's worth keeping this in mind.

The applied IPS matrix, combined with properly functioning support for chroma 4:4:4, ensures that the readability of fonts is at an excellent level. Letters appear sharp, regardless of the background colour or the content itself, so working with documents or browsing websites does not strain the eyes. In this role, the television easily deserves a very good, if not outstanding, rating, as there are not many models in this budget that perform as well. Of course, if we look at the Bravia 3 from a PC gamer’s perspective, the picture is not quite so rosy. We won't find G-SYNC or Free Sync frame synchronization with graphics cards, nor high refresh rates, so the television is not the best choice for fast-paced computer games. However, it performs excellently as a monitor for work, whether in a home office or a student room, and in this respect, it is truly hard to criticise.

Viewing angles

3/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
75%

There are no surprises here – the C7K has classic viewing angles for a VA panel. That is: sitting directly opposite – it’s great. The colours look good, the contrast is strong, everything is in place. But just shifting slightly to the side and it starts to get worse – the picture loses saturation, the black becomes greyish and the overall impression diminishes somewhat. So if we are planning to watch together with several people or have a sofa that takes up half the living room – it’s worth seating everyone more centrally. You can watch from the side, but don’t expect miracles – it’s simply a characteristic of the VA panel.

Thanks to the use of an IPS matrix, colours do not lose intensity as quickly as in the case of screens based on VA panels. Even when watching television with a larger group, when some people sit at an angle, the image remains clear and does not appear washed out. Of course, it is not at the level offered by organic OLED matrices, where the image looks identical from almost any position, but for an LCD television, the viewing angles in the Bravia 3 are among the better ones. This provides a sense of comfort and freedom, especially in larger living rooms or during family viewings, where it is difficult for everyone to find a spot directly in front of the screen.

TV efficiency during daytime

6.4/10

4.9/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Good
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV efficiency during daytime
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV efficiency during daytime
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV efficiency during daytime
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV efficiency during daytime

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

SONY BRAVIA 3: 337 cd/m2

TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85": 529 cd/m2

Fortunately, the TCL C7K performs quite well in a bright room. The applied matrix has a satin finish that effectively suppresses reflections, meaning we don't have to worry about reflections from lamps or windows even on sunny days. Importantly, the colours maintain their intensity and do not wash out, as can happen with weaker matte panels. As for the brightness itself, the average for content like YouTube or regular television reaches just below 500 nits. This is not a record-breaking result – for example, the MQLED85 (C765) performs better in this regard. However, it should work without major issues for everyday viewing during the day, as long as we do not plan to place it opposite a south-facing window without curtains.

Bravia 3 performs quite decently in the face of daylight. The satin coating on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and the colours do not lose their intensity when stronger external light hits the screen. As a result, in typical home conditions, with blinds open or in a living room with a larger window, the image maintains its clarity. However, it must be remembered that this is not a high-brightness television. Bravia 3 has no chance of competing with brighter models, so in very sunny rooms, there are moments when the screen simply does not stand out against intense light. In normal conditions, it will cope without problems, but in more challenging scenarios, one should not expect miracles.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V8.0012T01-LF1V531.002396
6120600301
Image processor
MT5896 2,5GB RAM
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV details about the matrix
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV details about the matrix
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV details about the matrix
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV details about the matrix

TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85"

SONY BRAVIA 3

TV features

7.3/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 TV features

SmartTV: GoogleTV

The greatest strength of the TCL C7K in everyday use is undoubtedly the Google TV system. Thanks to it, we have access to an almost endless library of apps, including some more niche ones that are often unavailable on other platforms. The built-in Google Assistant understands Polish, so we can easily ask what is on TV, what the weather is like, and even issue a few voice commands to control the television. The presence of Chromecast and AirPlay is also a plus, as they work seamlessly and make life easier.

User Features

However, the classic features leave something to be desired. Here we will find the basics – teletext, EPG, or the option to connect headphones – but that's about it. There is a lack of USB recording functionality or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, which can still be found with some competitors. It is also worth noting that Google TV in the TCL version can sometimes have oddly translated parts of the menu or minor errors in the interface. These are not things that interfere with everyday use, but those sensitive to details may notice them.

Smart TV Features

The biggest advantage of the Bravia 3 in everyday use is the presence of the Google TV system. Thanks to it, we have access to one of the largest libraries of apps and streaming services, so regardless of whether someone mainly uses Netflix, Disney+ or smaller platforms, everything is within reach. The Google voice assistant also worked very well, managing to respond to our commands quite "cleverly". In theory, the Google TV system should operate very smoothly, as Sony has been implementing it better than many cheaper competitors for years. Unfortunately, in the case of the Bravia 3, it is not as great as we might have hoped. During testing, we noticed slight stutters in the interface, and some functions, such as screen mirroring, simply refused to work. One might get the impression that the processor in this model sometimes struggles to handle the demanding system, and not everything works as smoothly as we would expect.

Classic Features

Even in the cheapest series, Sony can remind us of its experience with various users. The set includes two remote controls. The first is modern and minimalist, with a small number of buttons, which works excellently for using apps and Google TV functions. The second is a classic remote with a richer set of keys and a numeric keypad, which will be especially appreciated by older people accustomed to traditional solutions. This is a nice nod towards different user groups, and it must be acknowledged that Sony has solved this very practically. It's a pity, however, that the ability to record content from TV tuners to USB memory has disappeared compared to the X75WL model. The manufacturer has completely eliminated this function, so if someone was attached to it, they will unfortunately not find it in the Bravia 3.

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

9.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player on the TCL C7K performs really very well. It supports most of the most popular audio and video formats, so if we want to quickly throw something on from a USB drive and play it, there shouldn't be any problem. Of course, as is often the case, you can find some minor shortcomings – not every exotic codec will work (Apple's HEIC), not all subtitles will be perfectly synchronised (txt.). However, the biggest advantage of this television comes to the rescue, which is Google TV. With access to the Google Play store, we can easily install an alternative player, such as VLC, and then no files will be daunting.

Here Sony has really done a great job. The built-in player works quickly and doesn’t “complain” when launching various formats. We didn’t have to reach for external applications like VLC, as the television handled even files that can cause quite a few problems on other models – such as HEIC photos from Apple devices. It's a small detail, but one that shows the manufacturer wanted the user to have a complete sense of convenience. By plugging a film onto a USB drive or holiday photos onto an external hard drive, you can simply connect them and start watching on the big screen right away. No fuss, no installing additional software, no searching for workarounds. This is truly a rarity in televisions, and it must be admitted that in this aspect, the Bravia 3 really pleasantly surprised us.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7.7/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

In the larger versions of the C7K (from 55 inches upwards), the sound is even more impressive than in the smallest 50-inch variant. This is due to the greater number of built-in speakers and additional channels that allow for a fuller, more spacious sound. The bass becomes more pronounced, dialogues gain clarity, and the film effects can really fill the room.

It is worth mentioning the collaboration between TCL and the Bang & Olufsen brand, which appeared in the 2025 models. Even if we do not have a hundred percent certainty that original transducers from the Danish company are inside, the final effect surprises very positively. For a television without an additional soundbar, the larger C7K models deliver sound that can be enjoyed even during longer film screenings.

Bravia 3 plays in a rather flat manner, but makes up for it with loudness. It is perfectly suited for watching classic television, as the dialogues are clear and the mid tones are easily heard. This type of characteristic will be particularly appreciated by older users who primarily value speech intelligibility. However, if someone expects something more from the sound, like stronger bass or a wider soundstage, it is still worth reaching for a soundbar. The television supports modern codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, so an external sound system can easily take advantage of their potential. This assures that with a relatively modest expense, one can achieve a much fuller and more engaging sound.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

88dBC (Max)

75dBC