TCL C69K / Q6C vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

C69K / Q6C / C6K

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.1

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.6

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.3

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    8.4

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.4

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    7.0

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.5

    6.2

Advantages

  • Very good contrast and black: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Good motion smoothness: High refresh rate of 144Hz

  • Decent panel brightness

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HDMI 2.1, HGiG

  • Additional mode for PC gamers: 240Hz

  • GoogleTV system with a wide selection of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Very attractive price

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS matrix)

  • Very low input lag (approx. 10-12 ms)

  • Fluid webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with pointer

  • Better colour gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp fonts, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colours after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient upscaling of older content

  • Noticeable low-end blend in sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Management of backlighting could be more precise

  • Minor, occasional errors in the system

  • Slight ghosting visible in dynamic scenes

  • Great chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

  • Poor black level and low contrast

  • Low brightness (approximately 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Matrix refresh rate of only 60 Hz

  • USB player without support for HEIC files and very large images (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

The TCL C69K / Q6C is a TV that perfectly targets gamers and movie fans on a reasonable budget. Its biggest strength is the combination of a VA panel with Mini-LED backlighting. Simply put, contrast is high and blacks are deep, making evening movie sessions look truly impressive. Add to that a 144 Hz refresh rate, which does wonders not only for sports but especially for gaming. And for gamers, it’s a full package: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, and even a 240 Hz option for PC. Throw in Dolby Vision, which gives movies a cinematic touch, and you get a picture that’s just pleasing to the eye. On the software side, it runs Google TV with the Gemini AI assistant, so there’s no shortage of apps. The sound system holds up well too — Dolby Atmos and DTS support are nice additions, complemented by branded Onkyo speakers. Of course, it’s not perfect. The local dimming system can sometimes struggle in complex scenes, slightly lifting black levels. And those Polish translations in the menu... let’s just say they could use some work. Still, the C69K / Q6C makes a very strong case for itself. Considering the price, it’s one of the most interesting all-around TVs for both movies and gaming. Definitely worth watching out for during sales — and hoping for TCL’s usual post-launch firmware improvements.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed at all over the past few years. Apart from the new operating system, refreshed remote control, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design we have known for years. Thanks to the nanostructure filter, the television can display better, cleaner colours than standard budget televisions, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay for very poor blacks and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during night screenings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not just from brands like TCL or Hisense, but... from LG itself. The model we previously tested, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider colour gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model makes no sense – unless your priority is solely wide viewing angles, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for that (at the cost of tragic blacks and higher expenditure) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

113,750:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

17,350:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

16,300:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

9,850:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

4,850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Contrast and black detail

The heart of the image in TCL C69K / Q6C is the VA panel (specifically HVA from TCL CSOT), which offers a solid native contrast of around 6000–7000:1, even before local dimming is activated. However, the true strength of this model lies in the Mini-LED backlighting with the ability to dim individual zones. In the 55-inch unit we tested, we counted around 180 of them (this value increases with the diagonal size). For this price segment, the contrast is indeed very impressive. In less complex film scenes, for example in segments from "Oblivion," it presents excellently, and shots immersed in black are very striking. Nevertheless, the characteristics of Mini-LED technology mean that we do not always avoid issues – in more demanding frames with many bright details, halo effects or excessive dimming of certain elements may occur (regardless of the selected local dimming settings). All in all, contrast is undoubtedly a strong point of the C69K / Q6C.

The NanoCell series, including the model NANO81 we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who is somewhat familiar with screen technology, this means one thing: significant problems with black levels and contrast. Our measurements are merciless in this regard. A result of 800:1 is, to put it bluntly, a tragic outcome. In practice, this means that what should appear on the screen as deep black looks like a dark grey patch at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will be downright torturous – the image will lose all its depth and appear flat. If you do decide on this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: do not watch it in complete darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it is best to leave a gentle light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install LED strips behind the television. Such backlighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grey on the screen seem a little darker. Nevertheless, the start of the test for cinematic experiences looks bleak.

HDR effect quality

4.9/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.7%, Bt.2020: 71.4%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

610 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

425 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

148 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

HDR luminance

TCL C69K / Q6C

HDR luminance

In terms of brightness, TCL C69K / Q6C is a moderate model. In optimal film conditions, it shows its full potential, achieving a maximum of around 600 nits. In scenes with large, intense light sources, the HDR effect can be truly satisfying, providing a cinematic shimmer. However, it should be noted that when managing backlight zones, there are situations where parts of the image become dimmed, and sometimes they are barely visible. This suggests that there is still a lack of proper optimisation of the algorithms; however, considering the technical parameters in this price range, the design itself still presents very well.

If you are counting on HDR in the NANO81A to bring tears to your eyes, I must disappoint you. This television is simply too dark to truly show what this format is all about. With a brightness of only 250 nits, HDR exists here mainly on paper. In practice, during viewing, it is very difficult to distinguish whether we are watching high dynamic range content or regular SDR – it simply lacks that ‘punch’ of light in the bright parts of the image. However, to give credit where it’s due, we do have a glimmer of hope here – and quite a clear one at that. It concerns the colour gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it is not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. This is a really solid result that places this model significantly higher than typical budget options based on standard white LEDs without any filters. Of course, it still falls short of the level of quantum dot (QLED) TVs or advanced panels with PFS filters, but for this price point, the colours are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It's just a shame that this low brightness prevents them from fully ‘spreading their wings’ with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

5/10

5.3/10

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Factory color reproduction
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Factory color reproduction
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Filmmaker mode, which has made its debut in this year's TCL televisions (including the C69K / Q6C), is definitely the best choice "to start with." This is the mode we recommend for daily film and series viewings. Unfortunately, as is often the case, best does not mean perfect. In SDR material, the image proved to be too warm, with a pronounced red tint in the white balance. We had the opposite impression with HDR content – here the image became cooler than it should, due to an excess of blue. Additionally, there is the characteristic of brightness, which at times resulted in overexposure. In practice, this translated into quite noticeable errors in colour tests, which is difficult to accept in a mode branded as "from the creators."

For every film fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. Its aim is to display images as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements". Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left something to be desired. The main issue turned out to be the white balance. Measurements showed a distinct deficiency of blue colour, which in practice meant that many scenes had a slightly yellowish, even "yellowed" tint. The white was not perfectly pure, which detracted from the freshness of the image. Additionally, brightness management was also not ideal – the factory-set gamma was too low. The picture often appeared oversaturated, as if overly lifted from the shadows, which caused it to lose naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price category, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration possibilities of this model are enormous, which is a big plus for those who enjoy "digging" in the menu. We decided to approach the topic in our own way and see how much we could squeeze out of this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7.5/10

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Color reproduction after calibration

Through white balance correction, we were able to significantly reduce the tendency of C69K / Q6C to distort colours, which yielded a very good final result. After calibration, the issue of excessive warming of scenes in SDR and excessive cooling of the image in HDR disappeared. However, it is worth analysing the brightness characteristics more closely. While in SDR content it is hard to have major objections – the image looks really good, especially in older films, TV programmes or on YouTube – it performs significantly worse in the case of HDR content. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests that everything is fine, yet in practice (EOTF in films) the limitations of the design itself become apparent. This model has a tendency to excessively brighten small parts of the frame, only to overly dim the entire scene in other situations. The effect of calibration is therefore undeniable, and in terms of colour reproduction, C69K / Q6C gains a lot. Unfortunately, certain limitations arising from local dimming management simply cannot be bypassed.

After calibration, the NANO81A is a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools even in such an affordable model deserves a big plus. We managed to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colours natural, vibrant, and simply "true". In SDR content (that is, regular television, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks worlds better – it is clear, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It is clear that this panel has significant potential, which is simply wasted by poor presets out of the box. However, we do have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it concerns brightness management in HDR mode. LG's algorithm in this model is constructed very conservatively. The television intentionally dims the HDR picture to avoid overexposing the already weak blacks of the IPS panel. The programmers faced a choice: either to provide more light and accept that the blacks would become light grey or to reduce the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Nevertheless, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is significantly better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

9.3/10

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions

In the model C69K / Q6C, tonal transitions (between colours) are very smooth, and it is difficult to notice any banding. The image appears natural, and any minor imperfections are only visible on bright test screens, and that requires very careful scrutiny. In everyday viewing, the effect is simply outstanding. It can be confidently stated that in this category, C69K / Q6C performs exceptionally well.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element in which the NANO81A truly shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically noted no occurrences of banding, that is, the annoying "steps" visible where one colour should transition smoothly into another. Everything appears incredibly natural and smooth. This is particularly evident in the bright scenes from the film Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artefacts. However, what is even more impressive is how the television handles the extremely difficult, dark, and misty shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and serve up ugly patches instead of smooth mist, the NANO81A holds its ground, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is the fact that with darker shades, you will notice more of the weak blacks of this television rather than any issues with colour blending.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of image scaling, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. Lower quality content appears acceptable, and thanks to the lack of overscan issues, the image is displayed in full without any cropping. However, one should not expect miracles – very low-quality materials will not gain a second life here, as the image processor has its limitations.

Thin lines and details exhibit characteristic tearing, which reveals the absence of more advanced image enhancement algorithms. It is also a pity that the C69K / Q6C lacks a tone transition smoothing feature. As a result, in older films or video materials, banding of colours can be visible and may become distracting during prolonged viewing.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels mercilessly bring to light all the "dirt" and imperfections of lower-resolution content. However, with the LG NANO81A, the situation is quite different. This is truly a solid performer when it comes to handling content that is far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A significant advantage is the gradation reduction feature that you will find in the settings. It is extraordinarily effective in combating colour banding, which is a lifesaver when watching materials with a low bitrate, for instance, from some streaming services or older files from the web. However, it is worth maintaining a certain level of caution. Since we are dealing with a less powerful chip than in LG's top models, setting this option too aggressively may sometimes result in minor artefacts or slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimenting with this feature - in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.3/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

The use of a 144 Hz panel in TCL C69K / Q6C is a significant advantage in this price range. It represents an important step forward compared to its predecessor (C655 PRO), which only offered 60 Hz in 4K. The difference is particularly noticeable when watching sports or playing games – the ball, players, or dynamic action in games are displayed more clearly and without loss of detail. Another interesting feature is the panel's ability to work at 240 Hz (which the manufacturer does not officially mention) – we will return to this topic in relation to the PC gaming mode. TCL has also added a feature for movie fans: “Motion Clarity”. This allows users to adjust the picture to their preferences using two simple sliders. We can either keep the visible film frame or opt for very smooth, "

When it comes to motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a hard time. The television is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz. If you are looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast action games, you may feel a bit disappointed. With such a low native refresh rate, fast objects on the screen will always be a little blurred.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

TCL C69K / Q6C is a television that can confidently be described as equipment created with gamers in mind. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, VRR support, automatic game mode (ALLM), and Dolby Vision Gaming. Additionally, there is a practical Game Bar, which is a panel with the most important settings conveniently at hand – useful when we want to change something quickly during gameplay (e.g. screen aspect ratio: Yes, it can be done!). The wide range of VRR, reaching up to 240 Hz, is particularly noteworthy. However, this option is mainly for PC gamers who will operate below the native 4K resolution. In that case, the television can spread its wings and show additional smoothness, especially in fast-paced e-sports titles. For consoles, we stick to the classic limit of 120 Hz, but even so, the capabilities are truly extensive. The only downside is a slight ghosting that can occasionally be seen in dynamic scenes. Other than that, C69K / Q6C offers everything that gamers expect from a television.

NANO81A is unfortunately not hardware designed for e-sports. The lack of support for a 120 Hz signal is a fact that users planning to purchase this model simply have to come to terms with. Nevertheless, LG's engineers have made an effort to maximise the potential of this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience. Firstly, the television supports VRR technology (within the range of 48-60 Hz) and ALLM. As a result, the image remains stable and does not "tear", and the device automatically switches to low-latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from a console. Managing these settings is extremely simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay, which allows for quick viewing of parameters without leaving the game. A very significant advantage is the support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles because it enables the television to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown-out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which is unfortunately a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.7/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
13 ms
1080p120
10 ms
2160p60
18 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
12 ms
2160p120
11 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

In terms of input lag, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. With 120 Hz content, the delay is about 10 ms, and at times even less. This is a level at which the response is practically instantaneous and difficult to find any objections. For 60 Hz material, the result is around 18 ms – still a very good result, entirely sufficient for comfortable gaming.

In terms of response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is around 12 ms. This result is at a very low level, which for a gamer means one thing – the delay between moving the stick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically imperceptible. The television excels in fast-paced titles, where every millisecond counts, and in this regard, it does not lag behind significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
11ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Compatibility with PC
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Compatibility with PC

As a monitor for a computer, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. At its native resolution, we achieve 4K at 144 Hz, and by lowering the resolution, it can reach even 240 Hz. The television also works with Nvidia and AMD graphics cards, supporting both G-Sync and FreeSync. It is also difficult to find any complaints for office work. Thanks to the support for chroma 4:4:4, the fonts are sharp and legible, and any minor imperfections are so small that they remain unnoticed in everyday use.

Nano81A is truly a solid monitor for working with text. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper Chroma 4:4:4 implementation, fonts are very clear and sharp – practically everyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We noticed just one minor detail that we picked up with our laboratory meticulousness: the vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than the horizontal ones. However, this phenomenon is so minimal that we did not decide to deduct points for it. The scores only went down when it came to features typical for PC gamers – the lack of G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz will be a significant downside for those looking for a screen for dynamic computer games.

Viewing angles

3/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
66%

On the TCL C69K / Q6C, the viewing angles are typical for a VA panel. Sitting directly in front, the image looks very good, but any shift to the side results in a noticeable drop in colour saturation and brightness. The difference is particularly evident in colourful scenes – the hues become washed out, and the contrast loses its depth. Compared to IPS panels, this is clearly a weaker performance, although it is compensated by better blacks and higher native contrast.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the categories of black levels and contrast. Thanks to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles here are simply very good. It is in this section that the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality, even when viewed from a sharp angle. This makes the NANO81A a great option for those who have a wide furniture arrangement in their living room or often watch matches and films with larger groups.

Daytime performance

6.4/10

4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Daytime performance
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Daytime performance
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Daytime performance
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

TCL C69K / Q6C: 532 cd/m2

In bright lighting conditions, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The panel offers decent brightness (in SDR content, it reaches around 550 nits), which allows for comfortable TV viewing in an average-lit living room, and even on days when strong light comes through the windows. This means that daytime viewing does not require complete darkening of the room. Another positive aspect is that the screen coating does a fair job of suppressing reflections, so the television does not become a "mirror" even in bright light. However, it is not at the level of top models with more advanced anti-reflective coatings – in very challenging conditions (e.g., with large windows), reflections will be noticeable.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness of around 250 nits, it is difficult to recommend it wholeheartedly for very bright, strongly sunlit living rooms – in such conditions, the picture will simply lack punch. Nevertheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin panel used here does a decent job of suppressing reflections. Thanks to this, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won’t see every detail of your surroundings reflected on the screen. So if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing is certainly possible, but this model simply wasn’t designed to "fight" full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
V8-T653T01-LF1V531.002396
33.21.62
Image processor
MT5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

TCL C69K / Q6C

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

7/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features

Multimedia Features: Google TV

The Google TV system is undoubtedly the strongest user aspect of TCL C69K / Q6C. It gives the television its character and provides an advantage over many competitors. We receive a full package of services: from support for popular streaming applications, through support for screen mirroring, to AirPlay (so that iPhone users feel at home). Additionally, there is the Google Assistant, recently updated to Gemini AI, which not only answers questions but also efficiently executes simple commands (e.g., changing channels or searching for content in VOD). The system itself operates quite responsively. However, one cannot overlook a certain downside: the awkward translations in the Polish menu can elicit a smile but sometimes require a moment's thought to decipher their meaning.

Classic Features

In terms of classic television functions, the TCL C69K / Q6C fares rather average. We will not find USB recording or PiP mode here, which may be disappointing for some users. However, the manufacturer has not forgotten the basics: teletext television and a clear EPG are available, which still matter to certain users. In daily use, the support for external audio devices via Bluetooth is also useful. It’s a simple way to connect, for example, a speaker or headphones, which can be a practical solution for seniors. Beyond that, however, it's hard to find elements that would distinguish C69K / Q6C from its rivals – it is simply a solid but standard package of basic functions.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the biggest advantages of the NANO81A model is its "brain", which is the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025 here, which in terms of fluidity and user experience is on par with the more expensive models of this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating through the menu is pure pleasure – there are no annoying stutters, which often occur with budget competitors. All of this is thanks to the unique remote with a pointer function (cursor), which has undergone a visual makeover this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism – the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It fits perfectly in the hand, but this change also has a downside. The physical numeric keypad has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will be no problem at all. However, older household members, attached to entering channel numbers by heart, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of functions that we would call "classic", the NANO81A sticks to a tried-and-true standard. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but in everyday television tasks, it performs flawlessly. The handling of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including even the old faithful Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connection of a game controller or wireless headphones and speakers. It is simply a television that "works" – it is stable, predictable, and does not cause unnecessary complications during daily use.

Apps

9.6/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.9/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in TCL C69K / Q6C performs really well – practically all popular file formats work without major issues. There are indeed minor exceptions, particularly with less common codecs or unusual video file configurations, but in everyday use, this is rarely noticeable. The biggest advantage, however, is that the television runs on Google TV, which provides complete freedom in choosing additional software. If someone encounters a file that the standard player does not support, it's enough to install an alternative – such as VLC – and the problem disappears.

Many users still use their own USB drives to display movies or photos on a large screen. In this regard, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most film libraries will work "straight out of the box". However, one must bear in mind the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are limited to what the manufacturer has prepared for us. There is no possibility to install alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player cannot handle something, not much can be done about it. During testing, we encountered a few specific limitations. Firstly, support for HEIC files is lacking. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from a USB drive, the television simply won't see them – it's worth changing the file format to JPG on the phone immediately. We also noticed that the player has difficulties processing very large image files. Photos with a resolution of 20–28 Mpix may fail to load or cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, everyday multimedia handling is smooth.

Sound

6.5/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

In terms of audio, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The manufacturer has been boasting about its collaboration with the Onkyo brand for several years, and it indeed translates into sound quality. The sound is pleasant, with clear mids and a fairly clean top end, and overall it feels well-balanced. Of course, it cannot replace a full-fledged soundbar, especially regarding bass depth, but for built-in speakers in a television of this price range – it is really very good.

In terms of audio, the LG NANO81A pleasantly surprises compared to its higher-end sibling, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, NanoCell sounds a bit better, which is likely due to its slightly thicker casing. The greater volume allows for the extraction of any hints of low tones – the bass may not be powerful, but it is more clearly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one should not expect miracles. It is still a standard 2.0 speaker configuration with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristics remain similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are adequate, making dialogues in films and news programmes clear. Although this slight improvement in the lower registers is pleasing, for true home cinema or listening to music, it is still worth considering purchasing at least a basic soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC