TCL C655 Pro vs SHARP JP7765E

Direct comparison

JP7

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.5

6.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    6.0

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.3

    3.9

  • Gaming on console

    7.8

    6.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    5.0

  • Watching in bright light

    5.8

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    7.0

    5.2

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.6

    6.0

Advantages

  • High brightness

  • Deep blacks and contrast - Local Dimming technology

  • Google TV support with access to a variety of streaming apps

  • Features for gamers, such as ALLM, VRR, and Game Bar

  • Adaptive refresh rate 4K@60hz, 2K@120Hz, 1080p@120Hz

  • Very low input lag, even in Dolby Vision mode (13 ms)

  • Good black and contrast – mini-LED backlighting with a VA panel

  • High brightness – will cope in bright living rooms

  • Google TV system – unlimited base of applications and smart features

  • Very good file player – reads almost everything

  • Mini-jack output – rare and useful headphone jack

  • Extremely loud – up to 90 dB (ideal for seniors)

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • No content recording feature on USB and no picture-in-picture (PiP) option

  • Poor viewing angles due to the VA panel – the picture loses quality when viewed from the side

  • Huge smearing and only a 60Hz panel

  • Poor local dimming algorithms for mini-LED

  • Narrow viewing angles (a natural characteristic of VA panels)

  • Lack of VRR and HGiG – features for gamers

  • Strange sound – there is a "hole" in the dialogues

Our verdict

TCL C655 PRO is an upgrade of the basic model from this series, and although the name may suggest only minor differences, the addition of "PRO" truly signifies much more. The biggest change, compared to its less advanced sibling, is the picture quality. The manufacturer has opted for the implementation of local dimming technology, which significantly improves black levels and contrast. The television is able to offer us a more refined image. As a result, TCL C655 PRO clearly outshines the more basic version in this regard. The applied QLED panel further enhances the coverage of a wide colour range, offering vibrant and saturated colours, which excel in both films and dynamic content, such as games. In the context of gaming, just like the basic version, TCL C655 PRO offers a host of useful features for gamers – including ALLM, VRR, and Game Bar – which greatly enhance the gaming experience. The television can also adjust the screen refresh rate to a lower resolution, meaning that despite supporting 4K at 60 Hz, in Full HD or 2K, one can enjoy smoother images at 120 Hz. In daily use, the Google TV operating system works excellently. The intuitive interface, personalised recommendations, and broad access to streaming applications, such as Netflix, YouTube, or Disney+, make the television enjoyable to use. This makes it easy to overlook the lack of recording functionality and picture-in-picture (PiP), which is not a major issue given the rich offering of applications. If we are willing to make that slight price difference, we definitely recommend TCL C655 in the PRO version.

Sharp JP7765 is yet another offering in the market that attempts to prove that Mini-LED technology doesn’t have to cost a fortune. The low price comes hand in hand with an exceptionally high brightness – a peak of 1000 nits in HDR is a result that simply impresses in this price range. Although the proprietary processor doesn’t always manage the backlighting perfectly in demanding scenes, support for Dolby Vision effectively saves the situation. Thanks to dynamic metadata, the picture becomes plastic, deep, and simply attractive to the eye. Adding to this the Google TV system, extreme volume, and the now-rare jack headphone socket, we get a device that is a brilliant option for seniors or less demanding viewers transitioning from a regular, cheap LCD. In such a scenario, the Sharp JP7 presents itself as a really decent and cost-effective choice. However, it must be stated clearly: contrary to marketing slogans, this is not equipment for everyone. Gamers or sports fans will definitely not find themselves here. The biggest drawback of the JP7765 model is the slow, 60-hertz panel and significant motion blur, which essentially disqualifies this television for watching dynamic matches or playing fast-paced titles. The picture loses sharpness during rapid movements to such an extent that for a football or racing fan, it may be an unacceptable barrier.

So, for whom is the Sharp JP7765? It is a sensible choice for budget-conscious individuals who do not have high demands regarding motion fluidity but value a “kick” of brightness. By choosing the Sharp JP7, you will definitely make a better deal than purchasing basic (non-dimming) televisions from the competition. Rivals typically offer ordinary LCD panels for a similar price, which cannot compete with the capabilities of even such a basic Mini-LED model as the JP7. Ultimately, it comes down to a simple arrangement: you accept lower motion fluidity in exchange for powerful brightness, which is hard to find from other manufacturers at this price.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.1/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 84 (12 x 7)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review TCL C655 Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

56,000:1

Review TCL C655 Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

15,850:1

Review TCL C655 Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

11,350:1

Review TCL C655 Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

7,100:1

Review TCL C655 Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

64,100:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

18,250:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

46,350:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The TCL 655 PRO television, equipped with a VA panel, delivers solid contrast; however, the key role in enhancing image quality is played by local dimming technology. The tested 55-inch variant features 84 backlight zones, which significantly improve contrast compared to the model without the "PRO" designation, and this effect is distinctly visible in the first three tested scenes. It is worth noting that larger versions of this television naturally have more zones, which translates to even better contrast. Of course, as with any LCD television, certain imperfections remain – particularly noticeable in the tested scenes 4 and 5, where smaller bright elements lose a lot of quality. Nevertheless, considering the price of the device, the TCL 655 PRO makes a strong impression and stands out well in the black and contrast category.

When it comes to the most important aspects of Mini-LEDs, namely contrast and black levels, the Sharp JP7 in the tested 55-inch size uses a VA panel. Combined with backlighting divided into 160 zones (in a 10x16 arrangement), this promises truly solid performance. Measurements on static film screens can be quite shocking, with the measured contrast reaching five-digit values, even hitting levels of up to 50,000:1. On paper, this is a result that would not be out of place for much more expensive models, and black levels under such conditions look very attractive.

Unfortunately, a television is purchased for watching films rather than admiring static screens, and here the magic somewhat fades. When something more begins to happen on the screen – especially in complicated, dark scenes with a lot of small bright elements – the backlighting system in the JP7 starts to literally go haywire. The zones can "dance" before the viewer's eyes, turning on and off in a way that can be simply irritating and distracting from the action. It is evident that Sharp has significant room for improvement in terms of managing local dimming. The hardware potential in the form of Mini-LEDs is large, but the controlling algorithms clearly struggle to tame them.

HDR effect quality

5.2/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.0%, Bt.2020: 74.0%
DCI P3: 94.0%, Bt.2020: 70.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C655 Pro Brightness measurement

Result

566 nit

Review TCL C655 Pro Brightness measurement

Result

299 nit

Review TCL C655 Pro Brightness measurement

Result

387 nit

Review TCL C655 Pro Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review TCL C655 Pro Brightness measurement

Result

666 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

1014 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

606 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

180 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

605 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SHARP JP7765E

TCL C655 Pro

In the HDR effect quality category, the television TCL 655 PRO demonstrates decent capabilities, achieving a peak brightness of 550 nits. This allows for enjoyment of the HDR effects, which is particularly evident in scenes such as the first from the film Life of Pi or the last frame from The Meg. Nevertheless, the limited number of dimming zones causes some issues. While in bright scenes the television performs better than its lower model, in more demanding scenes, such as the second and fourth scenes from Sicario 2, it struggles. The dimming algorithm aims to achieve deep blacks, but at the cost of brightness – resulting in a drop in brightness of even half during those moments. In these more challenging scenes with small elements, it is hard to find any praise, and the HDR effect resembles more of an SDR. Regardless, the colour gamut coverage deserves commendation, which, like in the version without the PRO suffix, is at a very good level.

So how does the brightness of the Sharp JP7 fare in the most demanding titles? Honestly, at first, we were quite surprised. The television is capable of achieving over 1000 nits of brightness, which is an outstanding and rare result for a device costing just under 2000 PLN (for 55 inches). Watching bright, full-screen scenes, one might feel they are dealing with really good equipment. Unfortunately, though, we have to return to the problem we mentioned earlier regarding local dimming management. When small bright areas appear on a dark background (as in the test scenes from the films Life of Pi or Sicario 2), it is evident how poorly the JP7 handles zones. The television dims them almost to the maximum, crushing the entire HDR effect, which in such moments resembles a flat SDR image (less than 200 nits). This instability means that in demanding, contrast-heavy films, the image on the JP7 unfortunately loses its appeal.

As a consolation, it is worth noting that the panel has the potential for good colour display. It features a PFS (phosphor) filter, which allows for a solid 94% coverage of the DCI-P3 palette. The manufacturer calls its product a “QLED,” even though it is primarily based on the aforementioned PFS filter. Given the recent market battles of manufacturers over what may or may not be called QLED, we leave the question of the correctness of this naming to your assessment. However, it remains a fact that the potential for reproducing saturated colours in this panel is simply good.

Factory color reproduction

3.8/10

4/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Each of our television tests is conducted in film mode, which usually offers the best colour reproduction. Nonetheless, even this mode is not free from issues, as we noted in the model TCL 655 PRO.

In the case of HD content, the white balance distinctly shifts towards red, and this effect becomes particularly noticeable in a scene from Star Wars, where the white elements of the scenery take on a pink hue. For 4K HDR material, the situation is better, but there is a noticeable tendency to excessively emphasise the colour blue. As a result, the picture may appear artificially sharp, which proves to be uncomfortable for the eye over a longer period. The brightness characteristics also leave much to be desired. The Gamma graph indicates serious difficulties with excessive brightening, causing the overall presentation to appear washed out. Additionally, the EOTF curve reveals significant problems with reproducing very small elements – they are overly dimmed, as we detailed in the paragraph concerning HDR effects.

When it comes to out-of-the-box colours, the Sharp JP7 was tested in Film mode, which traditionally offers the most consistent image compared to the yellowed “Eco” mode or the glaring blue of the “Dynamic” mode. Although this is the best choice among the available settings, the results are still far from ideal. The white balance clearly lacked red and blue components, causing many scenes to take on an unnatural greenish tint. Another issue was the gamma – during full-screen scenes, the television provides excessive brightness, which completely diminishes its cinematic character. All of this resulted in colour reproduction errors, especially in shades of grey, which exceeded a value of Delta E 10. For reference: errors above 2-3 are already visible to the human eye, so we are dealing with a significant distortion of reality here.

In HDR mode, the situation is reversed, but not any better. Here, the blue colour dominates the white balance, which gives the image an unnatural, almost “retail” sharpness, reminiscent of aggressive demonstration modes. Furthermore, measurements of the EOTF curve emphasise the retail character of the image. The graph clearly shows that the television generates an image significantly brighter than the standards predict, resulting in an artificially boosted and unrealistic final effect. The Sharp JP7 is evidently trying to appear stronger than it actually is, but it does so at the cost of fidelity to the content.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

6.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibrating the television TCL 655 PRO, a noticeable improvement in white balance is evident, where the tendency for the screen to have an excessive pink hue has been completely eliminated, which was previously visible in the factory mode. The image has taken on more natural tones, especially in white and light elements, positively affecting the overall perception of the picture. Regarding brightness characteristics, the Gamma chart has also improved – the screen is no longer overly bright, which previously made the image appear washed out. However, there are still some issues with the EOTF curve, which are difficult to eliminate due to the design of the television and its limited number of backlight zones. These limitations prevent achieving perfect results in this regard. Nevertheless, despite this minor flaw, the overall effect after calibration is truly outstanding, providing high picture quality and very good colour reproduction.

We subjected the JP7 to our standard calibration procedure and really... the television gained a new lease of life thanks to it, particularly with SDR content (YouTube, classic television, series, or older films). As a result of our precise adjustment of the white balance and stabilisation of the gamma, colour errors fell to a value of below 3. This is a level at which the human eye has difficulty detecting distortions. In this scenario, the Sharp JP7 delivers an image with truly excellent colour precision, which is a significant advantage in this price class. However, content with HDR turned out to be much more problematic. Here, despite our efforts and interventions in the settings, the television simply would not cooperate. In the JP7 menu, we don't find any option that would allow for real control over brightness management (EOTF). Although a significant portion of the colour errors was reduced, the image still remained unnaturally oversaturated. It's a bit of a shame, as the potential of the mini-LED backlit panel is great, but the software presents a clear barrier here.

The conclusion is simple: when watching less demanding content (SDR) on the JP7, you can expect an image that is more than satisfactory, but in HDR, you must come to terms with a certain degree of "artificiality" that cannot be circumvented even with professional equipment.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

4.8/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The tonal transitions are really quite good and would deserve a high rating (8), however, the score has been clearly lowered for another reason - the image is artificially sharpened despite the "sharpness" setting being at 0. As a result, the image is unpleasant to look at.

When it comes to image clarity, posterisation on the Sharp JP7 fortunately does not detract too much from the content being viewed. In most scenes, it's difficult to notice annoying bands or the so-called "stepping" of colours, which often spoil the viewing experience during scenes with smooth colours. Of course, one shouldn't expect miracles here as, in some extremely demanding scenes, a trained eye may spot errors in tonal transitions. However, this is not a level that would realistically distract during a film. Well, unless you have good eyesight and are looking for artefacts on the screen – then you might find something.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

3.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The TCL 655 PRO television performs quite well with tonal transitions in lower quality materials. The "Gradual Smoothing" function at a low setting effectively smooths out tonal transitions, but this comes at the expense of losing some important details, such as the texture of objects. One positive aspect is that it does not negatively affect film grain, which helps maintain the natural appearance of the image.

In the context of digital processing, the television adds artificial sharpness. This may appeal to users who prefer a more vivid image. However, those who like a softer, subtler look may find this a drawback. Additionally, a downside is the cropping of the image due to overscan, which limits the field of view and trims the edges of the frame. This can be problematic in certain scenes - for example, news tickers.

In the case of lower quality materials and how the Sharp JP7 handles them, the situation is ambiguous. Let's start with the upscaling itself – here we have no major objections. The process of scaling the image to a higher resolution is correct; the picture remains readable and sharp, without the overscan effect, meaning no cropped edges. Of course, it is not at the level of top models, and at times one can notice slight jaggedness on the contours, but in this price range, the effect is fully acceptable.

However, the actual digital image processing performs significantly worse, which, apart from the upscaling, effectively does not exist. In the JP7 menu, we will not find any option that would effectively smooth out unwanted tonal transitions or reduce noise in the image. As a result, the signal reaches the panel in a very raw form, which, with heavily compressed materials (e.g. from YouTube), leads to visible posterisation. Either it is a flaw in the software or a very strange design decision, because in earlier Sharp models this function was available and, crucially, worked with noticeable effect. Here, we are left to deal with whatever the source provides us, without any digital support from the image processor.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.9/10

2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
-
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur ():

The TCL C655 PRO television is equipped with a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz, making it best suited for watching films. Additionally, the "Flicker Reduction" feature allows users to adjust the smoothness of the image, giving them the choice between a smoother motion and a cinematic, frame-by-frame effect. Moreover, the television performs well with lower resolution materials, such as Full HD and 2K, offering a refresh rate of 120 Hz, which will certainly appeal to gamers who can enjoy a smoother picture at the expense of lower resolution.

The motion fluidity on the Sharp JP7 is quite mediocre, and the reason is simple: the television uses a 60Hz panel. This instantly makes it difficult to recommend for watching sports or serious gaming, where higher refresh rates are already the standard. The only real plus is the presence of a smoothness feature, which we can control in films using a slider called De-judder. Lower settings provide a more raw, "cinematic" (framey) image, while higher settings add artificial smoothness. We suggest setting it somewhere in the middle of the scale, that is in the range of 3-5 – this is the best compromise to avoid the soap opera effect while also eliminating the tiring stuttering of the image. Interestingly, in the menu, we also find a "motion blur removal" slider, which usually indicates the presence of a 120Hz panel. However, with the JP7, it does not enhance the image at all and serves rather as a dummy – it is meant to look good in the settings, but technically it has no right to operate on this panel.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The TCL C655 PRO television offers an almost perfect set of features for gamers, supporting all the key technologies that significantly enhance the gaming experience. The ALLM feature automatically switches the television to low latency mode, resulting in improved responsiveness and minimal signal delay – particularly important in dynamic titles. VRR synchronises the screen refresh rate with the number of frames generated by the console, eliminating screen tearing and thus guaranteeing smoother gameplay.

Support for Dolby Vision in gaming mode allows for more detailed colour and contrast reproduction in games that support this format, while the Game Bar provides quick access to essential settings such as response time and latency level. Unfortunately, the model does not support 4K resolution at 120 Hz, which may disappoint the most demanding gamers. However, for those willing to forgo 4K, support for Full HD and 2K at 120 Hz delivers exceptionally smooth visuals, presenting an attractive alternative for enthusiasts of higher refresh rates.

As we mentioned earlier, the 60Hz panel is not a feature that will attract gamers to the Sharp JP7. Perhaps for the casual player, whose console still generates most titles at 60 frames per second, there might be something interesting? When it comes to specific additions, we find here:

  • ALLM Mode: Automatically switches the television to low latency game mode (input lag).

  • Game Menu: Which is hard to call a full-fledged “Game Bar,” as the functionality here is minimal. Aside from enabling ALLM, there’s only a game-specific motion smoother which we recommend avoiding as it introduces very noticeable artifacts and worsens responsiveness.

  • Dolby Vision Gaming: For Microsoft consoles.

Unfortunately, the list of shortcomings is significantly longer and more painful than the positives. The biggest disappointment is the lack of support for 120Hz, even when reducing the resolution to Full HD. The presence of 120Hz would allow for performance modes to be activated in many games on PS5 or Xbox Series X. Another shortcoming is VRR, which means that during frame drops, we are exposed to screen tearing. The lack of proper implementation of the HGiG standard is also very problematic. This results in the fact that during HDR calibration in the console menu, it is very easy to "overshoot" the brightness settings. As a result, instead of clear details in the highlights, we end up with an unnaturally over-bright image with cut-off details. Sharp JP7 is a proposition solely for very casual gamers.

Input lag

10/10

9.3/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
13 ms
1080p120
9 ms
29 ms
2160p60
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120 DV

The TCL C655 PRO television offers exceptional response times across all supported resolutions and refresh rates. Notably, it supports Dolby Vision with a response time of 13 ms, which is rarely seen in the competition. As a result, gamers can enjoy outstanding responsiveness even when using advanced HDR effects, significantly enhancing the gaming experience.

The issue of input lag in the Sharp JP7 is quite intriguing. In all 60Hz modes, the television achieves a result of just 13 ms. This is truly an excellent outcome that makes the lag practically imperceptible during gameplay. In this respect, Sharp has risen to the occasion, and even in dynamic titles, the controls remain responsive.

However, during testing, we encountered a certain technical puzzle. Using our professional Murideo generator, we were able to induce and measure input lag at 120Hz refresh rate in Full HD resolution. This sounds promising, but in reality, it is merely a "paper" curiosity, as standard external devices such as consoles or computers were unable to force the Sharp to operate in such a mode. Although professional diagnostic tools see some hidden potential here, for the end user, the JP7 remains just a 60Hz screen.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Collaboration with a PC on the TCL C655 Pro television is quite good, especially thanks to support for 4:4:4 chroma, which ensures good readability of fonts. This is a significant advantage if the television is to serve as a monitor for office work, where precision in text display is crucial. Additionally, the low input lag provides smooth operation, which will be appreciated by both gamers and users who require quick responses to mouse or keyboard movements.

One minor flaw that can be noticed is the fact that in vertical lines, there is sometimes a drop of one pixel. This can make letters appear slightly interrupted, which in certain situations may somewhat reduce work comfort, although generally, this issue should not be very bothersome for less demanding users. The television does not support 120Hz at its maximum resolution, hence a lower rating compared to higher models. However, TCL has ensured that users can enjoy smooth gameplay at 120Hz at lower resolutions such as 2K and FullHD.

The Sharp JP7 performs moderately as a monitor. Although the readability of standard fonts on a white or black background is adequate, the sharpness clearly decreases with darker and thinner text, making it difficult to work with text for extended periods. This panel is sufficient for occasional browsing of news in a web browser; however, we strongly advise against using it as a permanent screen for PC gaming. Besides the rigid limitation to 60Hz, the television does not support any form of frame synchronization (no G-Sync or FreeSync), which, combined with the significant motion blur of the display, results in a poor user experience in dynamic scenarios.

Viewing angles

2.7/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
77%

The viewing angles on the TCL C655 PRO, as is typical for VA panels, are quite limited. Compared to IPS panels, which maintain image quality regardless of the viewing angle, the VA panel in this model quickly loses contrast and colour saturation, even with a slight deviation from the axis. Watching at an angle causes blacks to appear greyer, while colours lose their depth and intensity. For this reason, the television is better suited for rooms where viewing takes place mainly straight on. It is not a television that is an ideal choice for large spaces where viewers may be seated at various angles.

The Sharp JP7 features a VA panel, which automatically means narrow viewing angles. It's a classic compromise: we get quite good black levels and contrast, but at the expense of image degradation when viewed from the side. At an angle, colours clearly fade and lose their saturation, so the JP7 is definitely a device for watching "head-on" rather than from the corner of the sofa.

Daytime performance

5.8/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

SHARP JP7765E: 708 cd/m2

TCL C655 Pro: 519 cd/m2

TCL C655 PRO offers quite decent brightness, reaching around 520 nits, which makes using the television during the day comfortable. Such brightness allows for good visibility of the image even in rooms with more sunlight. Although the television performs well in such conditions, the satin finish of the screen has only average capabilities to suppress reflections. In very bright environments, reflections may appear, which somewhat degrade the visibility of the image, particularly in scenes with lower contrast.

The satin coating of the matrix applied in the Sharp JP7 quite effectively dampens reflections, although it is far from being fully matte. However, the real "gamechanger" in bright rooms is the brightness of the device itself in SDR content. An average result of 700 nits and peaks around 1000 nits are outstanding in the segment up to 2000 PLN. Thanks to such high luminance, the television will easily cope even in well-lit living rooms. One just has to be careful of direct reflections, for example from a window opposite, as the satin used here will not eliminate them completely, but at this brightness level, the image will remain readable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
v8-R75PT01-LF1V195
UKN4.250714.091
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM
MT5896 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TCL C655 Pro

SHARP JP7765E

TV features

7/10

5.2/10

  • HDMI inputs
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C655 Pro TV features
Review TCL C655 Pro TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features

The TCL C655 PRO television operates on Google TV, which is an extension of the popular Android TV. Google TV offers personalised content recommendations based on viewed materials and user preferences, providing easy access to films, series, and applications. With its clear interface, navigation is straightforward, and access to the most popular streaming applications, such as Netflix, YouTube, Prime Video, and Disney+, allows for enjoyment of a wide range of content. The system also supports integration with the Google ecosystem, enabling control of the television using voice commands with Google Assistant and synchronisation with other smart home devices.

TCL C655 PRO offers additional features that enhance user comfort, such as support for Apple AirPlay, allowing for quick content streaming from Apple devices directly to the television screen. Furthermore, the ability to connect peripherals via Bluetooth – e.g. keyboards, mice, or headphones – makes usage even more convenient. Unfortunately, this model does not have the function to record content on USB or the picture-in-picture (PiP) option, which may be a disappointment for those accustomed to these conveniences in traditional television. Nevertheless, the TCL C655 PRO offers many modern solutions that facilitate everyday entertainment.

The design of the TCL C655 PRO television looks modern, with elegant and slim metal frames that add solidity and aesthetic appeal to the device. Overall, it looks very good and will certainly fit into most interiors. Although the frames are minimalist, the television itself is not among the thinnest on the market, especially in comparison to Korean competitors who often offer even slimmer designs.

Smart TV Features - Google TV

The main advantage of the Sharp JP7 is the Google TV system, which currently offers the widest access to applications on the market. The library is nearly limitless – from all popular streaming services to niche VOD solutions or media players. The system provides great freedom of personalisation and access to the latest versions of popular platforms. Included in the package is a Bluetooth remote, which allows the use of the built-in voice assistant without having to aim at the television. The only significant shortcoming in the multimedia sphere that we encountered is the lack of support for AirPlay. Users of Apple devices, such as iPhone or iPad, will not be able to stream content directly and wirelessly to the screen of this Sharp.

Classic Features and Connections

In terms of traditional television functions, the Sharp JP7 does not offer anything beyond the market standard. It lacks options for recording programmes to external storage (PVR) and a dual tuner, which excludes the use of picture-in-picture (PiP) functionality. The television only provides basic solutions, such as teletext and the ability to wirelessly connect accessories via Bluetooth. Gemini message content

As for the connections, the Sharp JP7 offers 4 HDMI ports, which the manufacturer proudly describes as standard 2.1. However, let's be clear: this is purely a marketing ploy because in practice, these ports only offer the full functionality of standard 2.0 due to the limitations of the television. On the plus side, the presence of a classic mini-jack headphone output allows for connecting older audio systems or speakers without the need for adapters or the HDMI eARC standard. This is a rather rare and very practical addition these days.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.3/10

9.4/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Thanks to the built-in player, the television is capable of playing most file formats found on external storage, making it a versatile tool for consuming multimedia. However, there may be certain limitations in handling some formats, which can be cumbersome for more demanding users. Fortunately, the Google TV system allows for the installation of other media players from Google Play, which helps to eliminate compatibility issues. This way, users have the opportunity to choose applications that best meet their needs, significantly enhancing the functionality of the television.

When it comes to multimedia handling from external sources, the Sharp JP7 performs simply exceptionally. The built-in player is a true surprise, as it managed to cope with practically every file format we provided. It even handled the HEIC format (mainly used on Apple devices) without any problems, which most televisions struggle with. Here, Sharp displayed images without the slightest hesitation. Of course, a huge advantage is the presence of the Google TV system, which allows the installation of external applications, such as VLC or Kodi, in case of any issues. However, in our opinion, this would be an unnecessary step as the factory player is refined and versatile enough to satisfy even the most demanding users.

Sound

6.6/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound on the TCL C655 PRO television is quite good, thanks to the 2x15W audio system supported by a 20W subwoofer branded by Onkyo. This results in a fuller sound and deeper bass, positively affecting the overall audio quality. However, one should not get overly enthusiastic – the television cannot replace a dedicated soundbar, especially for more demanding users looking for cinema-quality audio.

The sound emerging from the JP7765E model can be described as unusual, and even – looking at our measurements – quite peculiar. What stands out immediately is the immense volume scale. The television can reach levels of nearly 90 decibels (89 dBC on the chart), which is an almost record-breaking achievement in this class. Such strong "shrillness" will certainly appeal to seniors or individuals who need a device with very high audibility.

However, a glance at the frequency chart explains why the sound appears so "strange". The characteristic is extremely uneven: we have a solid boost in the lower registers (around 200 Hz) and in the high tones, but the mid-range – where most information about the human voice lies (between 500 Hz and 1.5 kHz) – experiences a huge drop. This makes the sound quality unnatural and can seem "recessed" during crucial moments of dialogues.

On the positive side, support for the Dolby Atmos format is noteworthy. However, it must be honestly admitted that to truly feel the potential of this system, it will be essential to connect at least a decent soundbar. The JP7's built-in speakers, despite being very loud, cannot deliver the cinematic depth and precision that this standard demands.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

89dBC (Max)

75dBC