TCL A300W NXTVision vs LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Direct compare

A300W / A300W PRO / NXTVision

Info

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.5

7.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.3

    6.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    6.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.9

    6.9

  • Gaming on console

    8.2

    8.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.2

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.7

    6.2

  • Utility functions

    7.0

    8.2

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    6.9

Advantages

  • Frames styled like a picture in the set

  • Mount included

  • VA panel with decent contrast

  • Support for all popular HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Great for gamers: VRR, G-Sync, ALLM, low input lag

  • High refresh rate - 144Hz

  • Free "picture mode"

  • Support for DTS:X and Dolby Atmos

  • GoogleTV operating system with the largest app base

  • Quite good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (around 1400 nits)

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and full set of gaming features (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and clear fonts,

  • WebOS with a rich assortment of apps and voice control

  • Magic Remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - it will work great for older content such as antenna TV or YouTube

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Motion blur issues

  • No recording function on USB or PiP

  • Inferior image quality in "art mode" compared to Samsung The Frame

  • Colours and blacks fade significantly under sunlight

  • No VESA standard

  • Software bugs

  • The local dimming algorithms require refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not offer a significant improvement over HDR10

Our verdict

At first glance, it is clear that the TCL A300 NXTVision aims to be more than just an ordinary television. It offers an image display mode that – unlike its competitors from Korea, Samsung The Frame – is completely free. Additionally, just like its rivals, it comes with freebies. In the packaging, besides the television, we find extra frames mimicking light wood and a flat wall mount, allowing the television to actually resemble a gallery piece. In terms of everyday use, the standout feature is the Google TV system – extensive, quick, and offering access to a vast number of applications. And if we feel like stepping out of the digital museum and jumping straight into the world of gaming, the A300 can surprise us. Two HDMI 2.1 ports, 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and very low input lag ensure that even demanding gamers can feel at home here. Well... perhaps except for those who are sensitive to motion blur – as this remains one of the major issues with this model. There are also downsides. Although the image mode is free – and that is worth appreciating – the quality of the available graphics is clearly lacking compared to what Samsung offers in its paid ART Store. The displayed images resemble photos rather than realistic reproductions of artworks. Unfortunately, the A300 – like the rival Hisense S7NQ – performs poorly here and additionally has certain software issues. The brightness of the television itself also leaves much to be desired – it is the darkest television of the entire "frame trio," which translates to average experiences during the day and limited HDR effect. Nevertheless, the TCL A300 NXTVision is quite a reasonable alternative to Samsung The Frame or S7NQ – especially if we are looking for a cheaper solution without additional fees for access to the "gallery" mode and with an operating system that does not limit us in terms of the number of applications. However, it is essential to remember that this is a proposition with a significant amount of compromises. If we want to save a bit and do not expect top-notch picture quality, then the A300 could be a hit in the picture stakes. Otherwise, it is worth taking a look at its competition.

The LG QNED93A is a television that, at first glance, appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get quite a lot: a significantly larger number of dimming zones, 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which remains one of the most convenient control systems. The QNED93A shines particularly in gaming applications. Four full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports allow for connecting consoles and PCs without any restrictions, and the low input lag remains consistent at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC users, an additional advantage is the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. Therefore, it can be confidently said that in terms of gaming features, the QNED93A holds its own against the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has long been regarded as one of the most user-friendly in everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows for controlling the television like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness can also be considered a plus. At its peak, it managed to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is sufficient for the picture to remain vibrant in brighter rooms, and for special effects in films or games to look convincing. The image processor handles scaling of older content well – television or films in lower resolution appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be denied that the biggest problem with the QNED93A lies in the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of black, the screen can dim significantly, causing many details to simply disappear. The effect is such that contrast appears better at first glance, but at the cost of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which usually improves certain aspects of screens, yet in this case, it makes little difference. The differences between dynamic and static metadata literally have to be searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware itself, with its number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting, provides grounds for a better result. So, who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that works excellently as a home entertainment centre, especially if you're considering gaming on a console or PC. In everyday television viewing and films in well-lit conditions, it also delivers a lot of satisfaction due to its high brightness and decent image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and full HDR utilisation, this model does not match its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been refined as well as in their OLED televisions.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
stand-type-
Central
Bezel colour
White
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, Changeable frames
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.5/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Contrast:

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Contrast and black detail

Result

5,450:1

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Contrast and black detail

Result

4,000:1

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Contrast and black detail

Result

3,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Contrast and black detail
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

The TCL A300, also known as NXTVision, uses a VA panel, so right from the start, one could expect decent contrast. On our test charts, the television indeed showed typical results for this type of panel – in the best case, the contrast reached around 5000:1, which is not a bad result for this segment.

However, it should be noted that the model is not equipped with any local dimming technology, which unfortunately is noticeable in practice. The black levels, though quite deep at times, often lean towards navy blue or grey – especially in darker scenes. In short: for a television without local dimming, it's not bad, but it cannot be compared to models that already have this feature on board.

We examined the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, equipped with a high-contrast VA panel. However, in the case of Mini-LED televisions, it is not just the panel itself, but primarily the number and operation of local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted as many as 308 zones, which already looks impressive from the start. For comparison, last year's QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only about 160. The difference is enormous and shows that LG has made a serious step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but practice quickly cools the enthusiasm. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed be impressive – bright elements are clearly separated from blacks, and in many scenes, the depth of the image truly pleases the eye. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in the backlighting design, the results are not much better than in last year's model. The algorithms controlling the dimming can be too aggressive. This is especially noticeable in darker sequences, where the screen dims to such an extent that subtle details disappear from view. Many viewers will appreciate the deeper blacks, but it is hard not to notice that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic are scenes with many small, bright elements. It is then that the typical halo effects, meaning glowing outlines, characteristic of LCD with local dimming zones appear around them. This phenomenon does not completely ruin the experience, but it reminds us that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we have the impression that the manufacturer did not pay enough attention to optimising the new model in terms of blacks and contrast.

HDR effect quality

5/10

5.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 94.2%, Bt.2020: 71.0%
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Brightness measurement

Result

357 nit

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Brightness measurement

Result

348 nit

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Brightness measurement

Result

338 nit

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Brightness measurement

Result

350 nit

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Brightness measurement

Result

389 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review TCL A300W NXTVision HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review TCL A300W NXTVision HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review TCL A300W NXTVision HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review TCL A300W NXTVision HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

HDR luminance

TCL A300W NXTVision

HDR luminance

When it comes to brightness, the TCL A300W is definitely the darkest television among all frame-style models, such as Samsung The Frame or Hisense CanvasTV – and unfortunately, this is immediately noticeable. In our measurements, the peak luminance reached a mere 400 nits, and on test film patterns, this value dropped to 350 nits. This is definitely too little to experience the true “magic” of bright HDR effects. As a consolation – the television is equipped with a PFS LED coating (which is something like QLED), providing very good coverage of a wide colour gamut, both DCI-P3 and BT.2020. In addition, it has full support for all popular HDR formats – HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, and Dolby Vision – which somewhat compensates for the lack of brightness and helps improve the overall perception of content in this quality.

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A has not directly translated to noticeably better contrast, it is hard to deny one thing about this model – it is brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real film scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with white or bright lights, the screen could maintain high luminance, which created a truly decent amazing HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the television could showcase true class, that is in scenes requiring precision, all the magic dissipates. The dimming algorithms, which we mentioned earlier, operate so aggressively that small bright objects – such as distant lights, stars, or the moon – can almost completely disappear. A glance at the test scenes from the film Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) shows how subtle details are dimmed to the limits of their visibility. It's a pity, as a greater number of zones could theoretically have led to significantly better results. Fortunately, there are also strengths. The QNED93A performs well in terms of colour gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colours in films appear vivid and full, and the picture does not lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. Therefore, one could say that the HDR in this model is solid, although the underdeveloped local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

Factory color reproduction

5.9/10

6/10

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

TCL A300 offers several picture modes, but without a doubt, the best is the movie mode. Unfortunately, although it is the best option available, it is not free from errors. In both HD and HDR content, the image has a noticeably too warm hue - it leans slightly towards pink, which is particularly noticeable in scenes with snow. Instead of pure white, we get a pinkish tint that spoils the natural perception of colours.

The management of brightness is also not very good. In the case of older HD material, the image often seems too dark - which is confirmed by the inflated gamma value. Conversely, with HDR content, the effect is the opposite - the image is overly bright, which we observed in scenes from the film Pan. Such a lack of consistency also affects the accuracy of colour reproduction - a test with the ColorChecker showed that many samples clearly deviate from the reference values.

Fortunately, TCL allows for manual adjustment of settings, so we decided to check how the television would perform after our professional calibration. The effects of this adjustment are described below.

In filmmaker mode, the colour reproduction on the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although there were some reservations. In SDR content, the white balance was shifted towards warmer tones, which gave the screen a slight yellowish tint overall. The gamma, in turn, led to a slight brightness increase, making the image appear somewhat less natural, especially in scenes requiring precise shading (this is clearly visible in the comparison photo). This is not a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the image deviates from the aesthetics intended by the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation was somewhat different. The white balance, in this case, was quite good, ensuring that the whites neither leaned towards pink nor unwanted green hues. However, managing brightness turned out to be an issue. An analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments, the television could be noticeably too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some detail and lowering the realism of the scenes. This spoiled the reception of HDR effects, which were theoretically supposed to make the biggest impression. For this reason, we decided to carry out calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8/10

7.8/10

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL A300W NXTVision Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration

After our professional calibration, the TCL A300 has literally received a new lease of life. The image has stopped being too warm, and the colours finally look as they should – which was confirmed by the ColorChecker test, where the colour samples finally started to hit their marks, at least to some reasonable extent. It was also possible to partially correct the brightness management – the image is now more balanced and less "wobbly" between different types of content. Of course, certain limitations cannot be overcome – a slightly noticeable blooming effect is still present, but that is a characteristic of the technology and not something that can be eliminated even after professional settings.

Generally speaking: after calibration, the A300 performs significantly better and gains a completely new quality.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode on the QNED93A has improved primarily in areas that matter most on a daily basis. We managed to correct the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which is what we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality films. As a result, the colours look natural and pleasant, making the overall experience much more comfortable. We also made adjustments in HDR mode, but here the biggest issue turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG offers some flexibility in the settings, the television still manages brightness on its own terms. It is evident that the local dimming algorithms are not fully refined and can ruin the viewing experience by darkening parts of the image at inappropriate times. Nevertheless, it is worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for everyday viewing.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.6/10

8/10

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL A300W NXTVision Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL A300W NXTVision Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL A300W NXTVision Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions

TCL A300 NXTVision is another frame-style television that handles transitions of tones really well. It's hard to find distinct bands or sharp transitions between shades of the same colour – the overall appearance is natural and smooth.

However, it must be admitted that among the three tested models (The Frame and S7NQ), TCL performs the worst in this category. In darker and lighter scenes, slight imperfections can be noticed. Nonetheless, looking at it as a whole, for a television in this price range – it presents itself really solidly. It may not be the best of the bunch, but it maintains a very good level.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is truly impressive. In most scenes, there are no artificial colour separations or banding effects visible. The dark shots are particularly surprising in a positive way – it is precisely in these that many televisions struggle, yet here the image remains smooth and coherent. In brighter segments, one can note subtle colour blending, however, they are not pronounced enough to significantly distract the viewer. During testing, we encountered a clear issue with DSE, or the so-called "dirty screen" effect. On our unit, the phenomenon was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners visibly darkened, giving the impression of vignetting. This may be a flaw of the test unit, but during intense viewing, we found it hard to overlook.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review TCL A300W NXTVision Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

TCL A300 handles tonal transitions in high-quality films very well, but the question arises – how does it perform with weaker material? The television is equipped with a tonal transition smoothing function, but its effectiveness can be described in one word: "random." In one scene it could work and improve the gradation, but when turned off… the effect remains the same. There is a lack of consistency and predictability.

Image scaling is also not one of A300's strong points. On the test chart, the main character actually looked better than on the raw signal, but with thin lines – such as fonts or background details – there was noticeable jaggedness and aliasing. On the positive side, the television does not crop the image and has no problems with overscan, but the overall quality of scaling is rather average.

The LG QNED93A proves to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor handles scaling extremely well, which means even older films or terrestrial television benefit from increased sharpness and detail. During the screening of "The Godfather," it is clearly visible how upscaling retrieves additional details from the image – the faces of the characters and the texture of their clothing appear much clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function for reducing unwanted colour banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the "Medium" setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without excessively interfering with the image. As a result, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen does not appear artificially smooth. It is possible that in some scenes slight colour banding can still be observed, but in practice, the effect is more beneficial than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

Blur and motion smoothness

6.4/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
56%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

The TCL A300 is equipped with a 144 Hz panel, which should immediately satisfy practically everyone – both gamers and sports fans. The motion is smooth and the image is clear even during fast-paced scenes. Additionally, the television offers motion enhancement functionality called "Motion," where we find two sliders on a 10-point scale. These allow you to adjust the effect to your own preferences – from a classic, cinematic look with visible frames to a very smooth (though somewhat unnatural) image reminiscent of soap opera effects. This way, everyone can find a setting that suits them.

The LG QNED93A is equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly making their way into televisions can be viewed positively. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this respect, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the picture using the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion character with visible frames and a complete smoothing with theatrical motion.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

TCL A300 is a television designed not only to transport us to a digital art museum but also to a full-fledged gaming world. Here, we find practically everything one could expect from gaming equipment: two full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, 144 Hz refresh rate, VRR support, and ALLM.

The proper implementation of the HGIG mode also deserves praise – something that competitor Hisense sometimes struggles with. The television easily handles lower resolutions (e.g., Full HD) while maintaining high refresh rates, which older console or PC owners will appreciate.

In addition, there is an attractive and clear GameBar that facilitates quick access to settings for gamers. The A300 is really well-prepared for top-level gaming – it's just a shame that issues with smearing slightly tarnish its overall image as a gaming device.

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been prepared with gamers in mind. Right from the outset, we get a complete set – all four HDMI ports operate in standard 2.1, so regardless of whether we connect a console, PC or amplifier, we can be assured of full compatibility. This is important, as many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing hinders the entire equipment from having maximum capabilities. There is also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which automatically switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console is turned on, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This ensures the picture doesn't stutter or jerk, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is sufficient for consoles, in the case of PCs, the QNED93A allows for even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, and this makes a difference, especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in gaming – the television supports the HGiG mode, which are guidelines to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as the game developers intended. To top it off, we get Game Bar – a special information bar that appears on the screen, showing parameters in real-time. You can monitor the frame rate, active VRR functions, or the level of input lag. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts but for anyone who wants to quickly check what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

Input lag

9.7/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
16 ms
1080p120
9 ms
7 ms
2160p60
18 ms
16 ms
2160p120
9 ms
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
18 ms
15 ms
2160p120
9 ms
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
23 ms
21 ms
2160p120 DV
12 ms
7 ms

In terms of input lag, the TCL A300 performs really well. Values below 10 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz are something many gamers dream of – such low lag is practically unnoticeable, both during everyday gaming and in more demanding e-sports titles. One might criticise the result of 23 ms in Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, but it is still a sufficiently low value that it's hard to have serious objections. In this category, the A300 really excels.

The LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of when it comes to latency. The television responds instantly to our actions, as seen in the initial tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, which means almost immediate response – shots, passes, or precise movements of the joystick are instantly reflected on the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result rises slightly to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the bounds of full comfort. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for games, which in the QNED93A works with the Xbox Series X console. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a detriment, but in practice, it is still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, the gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

Compatibility with PC

8.2/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
11ms
7ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review TCL A300W NXTVision Compatibility with PC
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Compatibility with PC

If we plan to use the TCL A300 as a monitor for a computer, we may be pleasantly surprised. The television performs really well in this role. It is equipped with a 144 Hz panel, supports G-Sync, and, as we have already mentioned, offers very low input lag, so gaming on it with a connected PC is a pure pleasure.

Working with text is also possible, though with some limitations. The TCL A300 has slight issues displaying dark fonts and thin lines – this stems from the subpixel structure, which in everyday use can be somewhat bothersome, although it looks better in photos than in reality.

The television supports chroma 4:4:4, but only up to 120 Hz. Therefore, we have indicated that this feature is available, but with a limitation – if we care about perfectly readable fonts, it is advisable to stick to a refresh rate of 120 Hz. At 144 Hz, the sharpness of the text may suffer slightly.

A new feature of this year's model is the full support for 144 Hz refresh rates, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, as well as with AMD products, where it operates with FreeSync Premium Pro. As a result, gameplay is smooth, without stuttering or tearing, and the panel itself performs very well in dynamic esports titles and demanding AAA productions.

Equally important is the clarity of the image for daily work. The television supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and applications are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a small detail – against a dark background with bright letters, subtle horizontal stripes may appear, resulting from the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the convenience of using the television on a daily basis, but perfectionists might notice it after prolonged exposure to text. But we don’t think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen with text sitting less than 1 meter away from it 😉.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

2.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
79%
78%

The viewing angles on the TCL A300 NXTVision are – let's be honest – mediocre. The television is equipped with a VA panel, which inherently has rather limited angles and unfortunately this is evident here. The video below speaks for itself – even a slight deviation from the axis results in a noticeable drop in contrast and colour saturation. It's a shame that this is yet another frame-style television that has done absolutely nothing about it. After all, we don't always have the opportunity to sit perfectly straight on – especially if the device is also intended to serve a decorative function in the living room.

QNED93A uses a VA panel, which means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at an angle of about 45 degrees, brightness drops by as much as 80%, and colours begin to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast that VA panels offer. There is no additional coating to enhance angles here, as in some more expensive models, which is why the QNED93A performs best when viewed head-on. If you are planning a large family screening where some viewers will sit more to the side, you must take into account that the picture will not be as attractive as it is in the centre of the screen.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.7/10

6.2/10

Matrix coating
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Poor
Good
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV efficiency during daytime
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV efficiency during daytime
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV efficiency during daytime
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV efficiency during daytime

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

TCL A300W NXTVision: 388 cd/m2

The TCL A300 NXTVision is equipped with a matte panel very similar to the one found in one of its Chinese competitors – the Hisense S7NQ model. Such a surface handles reflections fairly well, although it must be said that it performs worse than Samsung's The Frame, which offers a significantly higher level in this regard. As is often the case with matte displays, blacks lose their depth during the day and appear more gray than black – and this is no different here. Unfortunately, the fact that the A300 is the darkest television of the three tested does not help either. As a result, it has a real problem standing out in brightly lit rooms.

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix, which handles glare suppression moderately well. It is certainly not on the level of matte screens, but it does not have the mirror-like surface feel of models with a glossy finish. As a result, reflections are not overly distracting, and the colours maintain their intensity even when light from a window strikes the screen. The brightness also scores positively. The average level in HDR mode hovers around 550–600 nits. This means that the television performs well in well-lit rooms, allowing viewers to enjoy a film even during the day, with the blinds only partially drawn. In the role of a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A performs quite well.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
TVM6.0.1_549fe6714_240813
33.20.74
Image processor
mt5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV details about the matrix
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV details about the matrix

TCL A300W NXTVision

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

TV features

7/10

8.2/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review TCL A300W NXTVision TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features

The TCL A300 is a television styled to resemble a painting, which can successfully masquerade as a work of art during everyday use, hanging on the wall. It is equipped with a special image display mode, additional frames in a light wood tone, and a flat wall mount that allows the television to be hung like a true picture – flush against the wall.

A significant advantage of the image mode is that it is completely free. We have access to dozens of works from which we can choose the one to be displayed in standby mode – instead of a black screen, the picture we selected remains on the wall. The quality of the graphic reproductions is decent, but it must be admitted that it clearly falls short of that from the Samsung ART Store. Although access to images there is paid, the quality of the scans is significantly better – you can see the texture of the paint, the canvas, and the details. In the TCL A300, it resembles high-quality photographs more than realistic reproductions of artworks. Additionally, the implementation of the image mode in the system leaves much to be desired. For example – if we set the brightness in image mode to 10%, that same value automatically transfers to the normal viewing mode, where we could comfortably set the brightness to 50% or even 100%. This works in the opposite direction too – when we set the brightness to 100% in normal mode, switching to gallery mode displays the images with that same maximum brightness, shining too intensely and losing the entire effect of a “picture on the wall.” These are minor but annoying errors that can ruin the experience of what was intended to be visually subtle and elegant.

Moving on to more classic features – the A300 runs on the Google TV system, which currently offers by far the largest selection of applications (the full list available below). The well-functioning voice assistant with support for the Polish language is also a major plus. As standard – as in most TCL televisions – the USB recording function or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode is missing.

Smart Features

The QNED93A runs on webOS, which is one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It comes with AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is quite clear and mostly fast, although in the tested unit, there were instances where the response to pressing the remote control required a moment of "thought". However, it's hard to consider this a serious issue – webOS still remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates that will enhance it even more.

Classic Features

In this model, LG has not included the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the television itself performs excellently as a screen for everyday viewing of channels from the antenna. The EPG interface is readable, the television offers a TV guide, and we have the ability to record programmes from the built-in tuners directly onto a USB stick. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We only missed the PiP feature, which in 2025 is offered by just two manufacturers.

Magic Remote

The Magic remote is still the biggest difference compared to competitors. In 2025, it underwent a slight facelift – it has fewer buttons and resembles the minimalist remotes from Samsung. However, the cursor remains key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It's incredibly simple, yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is much faster, and it's difficult to then switch back to traditional buttons.

Playing files from USB

8.9/10

8.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player in the TCL A300 works as it should – most popular video and photo files play without any issues. There is a lack of support for the HEIC format from Apple (which is quite common in many televisions), but most users still use AirPlay, so this shouldn't be a major problem. If someone is not satisfied with the default player, the Google TV system offers considerable options – it's easy to install an alternative app that better suits our tastes. Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that the factory solution is entirely sufficient for everyday use.

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats without any issues, so it is quite sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor oversights. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which is Apple's photo format. The manufacturer claims that the television should be able to open them, but in practice, we were unable to confirm this. The second issue concerned text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, the other more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it's hard to consider this a real limitation in everyday use.

Apps

9.6/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

6/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

When it comes to sound, the TCL A300W – like its competitors – plays quite... flat, after all, we are talking about a super flat television. For everyday watching of news or series, this level is entirely sufficient, but during film screenings, we may clearly miss depth and space. On the plus side, it is worth noting that the television supports both Dolby Atmos and the increasingly rare DTS:X – which offers more options when connecting an external audio system. It is also worth mentioning that the A300 PRO model has been equipped with a dedicated, flat soundbar. And not just any soundbar – it performs better than most of the televisions we have tested.

The LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for built-in speakers in a television. The sound quality is fairly clear, and at medium volume levels, vocals and dialogues come across clearly. The bass, as is often the case in relatively slim designs, is not the strongest, but its presence can be heard and is entirely sufficient for everyday viewing of series. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and does not lead to strong distortions, although during more demanding cinematic scenes, it's evident that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as decent and not off-putting. It certainly won't compete with a soundbar, but it won't ruin your film experience either.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC