Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

BRAVIA 3 / K-(XX)S3

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.2

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.3

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.3

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.4

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    3.5

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    6.5

    5.8

Advantages

  • Significantly better contrast and deeper blacks than in the IPS variant

  • Higher screen brightness, which improves viewing comfort during the day

  • More uniform panel, fewer problems with vignetting and lightening

  • Smooth tonal transitions, especially in bright scenes

  • Wide colour palette coverage (over 91% DCI-P3)

  • Effective upscaling of lower quality materials

  • Support for Dolby Vision, which partially enhances the experience in HDR content

  • Google TV system with a large library of applications

  • Two remotes included – a classic and a minimalist one

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast of the VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Support for HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap television)

  • Good readability of fonts – works well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with a numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • Much worse viewing angles than in the version with an IPS panel

  • Collaboration with PC clearly weaker: worse font readability and noticeable dithering

  • Occasional stuttering of the Google TV system

  • No USB recording function

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Absence of any smoothness-enhancing features makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface works slowly, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

Our verdict

Sony Bravia 3 in the VA panel variant is a television that, in terms of character, remains the same budget model, but the change in panel type makes watching films and series significantly more enjoyable. The higher contrast and deeper blacks finally allow for evening viewing without the impression that the screen is drowning in shades of grey. This is a considerable advantage over the IPS version, even if it comes at the expense of much worse viewing angles. In practice, it comes down to choice – if we primarily watch from a sofa positioned directly in front, the VA panel offers a decidedly better effect. The rest of the picture remains largely the same. The PFS filter still provides pleasantly saturated colours, and the upscaling is at a good level, resulting in SDR content looking clean and aesthetic. The Google TV system, although it doesn’t always run perfectly smoothly, remains a huge asset – access to a wide library of apps and streaming platforms is something that competitors in this price range do not always offer in such a polished form. At the same time, the Bravia 3 with VA does not solve all the issues of its predecessor. The HDR brightness of around 350 nits still does not allow for a true high dynamic range effect, and the lack of local dimming means that fine details can still be overexposed. Additionally, there is no USB recording, which was present in the predecessor. So, who is the Bravia 3 in the VA version for? It is for those who want to enter the world of Sony televisions at a lower cost and care about decent quality in films and series, primarily watching lower quality content. It is not a proposal for gamers or for someone expecting cinematic HDR effects. Similar to the IPS version, it is hard to speak of a bargain – even if it is the “cheapest Sony of 2025,” it remains more expensive than competitors who can offer Mini-LEDs with clearly better contrast and brightness at the same price. Therefore, it is worth considering this model primarily when we come across an attractive promotion.

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it’s really just the price. This is a model that is primarily meant to be cheap, and it accomplishes that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget model at 60 Hz", Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which, when connected to a console, really improves the experience and makes everything quite responsive. But... there’s the catch. The biggest issue with this television is its brightness, or rather the lack of it. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and unclear, despite having a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is essentially just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary punch, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically lag behind other cheap screens. The question is whether you will get along with the Titan OS system, which is currently a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard at the competition. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs aplenty, the Philips PUS7000 is in for a really tough battle. If you value a known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Average
Stand type
stand-type-
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Base adjustment
Fixed
Accessories
Two remote controls, Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.7/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,250:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,050:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,000:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The biggest difference in the 50-inch variant is the way the Bravia 3 handles contrast. Although the television is not equipped with a local dimming system, the very change of the matrix type to VA provides a noticeable effect. The contrast is definitely higher than in the other sizes based on IPS panels, and the black no longer resembles faded shades of grey or navy. As a result, much more detail is visible in the darker parts of the image, making evening viewing simply more enjoyable. It's still not on the level of the more expensive Sony models, but the difference compared to the other variants of the Bravia 3 is clear and easily noticeable after just a short viewing session.

The model PUS7000 tested by us in the size of 55 inches has been equipped with a VA panel. This is of great importance for the quality of black, as in such budget constructions we will not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. All the work thus rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at the level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewing than in the case of competing televisions with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, which means that dark parts of the image do not appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. It is worth adding, however, that with the lights completely off, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it is advisable to consider watching the television with light, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips televisions, which optically increases contrast through a glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we will not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series, such as the PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

4.9/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.9%, Bt.2020: 67.3%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

319 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

360 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

393 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

365 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

395 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA)

Interestingly, the 50-inch version of the Bravia 3 performs slightly better in terms of brightness than its larger variants. In measurements, it achieved around 370 nits, which still does not compete with top-tier televisions, but is sufficient to suggest a semblance of HDR effect. For some users, this level will be acceptable, while others will view it as typical for SDR content, where striking highlights or strong contrasts are not expected. It must be clearly stated that the Bravia 3 is not a television for those looking to extract the maximum quality from the most challenging film materials.

This does not mean, however, that everything performs averagely. Sony has equipped this model with an additional PFS filter, which works similarly to solutions used in QLED televisions. As a result, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut has increased to over 91 percent. In everyday use, this means more vivid, saturated colours and also a more pleasing image texture. Even though it lacks strong lighting effects, films and series can look significantly more appealing than with its predecessor, the X75WL.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. The screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to properly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it is better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as discussed below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers enhancing colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

5.8/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Sony Bravia 3 was primarily tested in film mode, which immediately proved to be the best choice among the factory settings. It is not an ideal picture, but compared to the eco mode that the television offers right out of the box, the difference is clear and it is a positive one. In film mode, one can notice a certain issue: the image appears too warm, which results from the lack of blue in the white balance. Nevertheless, in SDR content, the final effect can still be regarded as quite decent and satisfying for everyday viewing. Much more serious errors occur in HDR materials. The Color Checker analysis showed significant deviations, and poor brightness management, combined with limited colour gamut coverage, further exposes the shortcomings of the image in this mode. All of this means that HDR in the Bravia 3 edition is unconvincing and can spoil the impression left by a quite decent SDR content setup. Fortunately, this is not a hopeless situation. Various errors can be mitigated to some extent, and some can even be completely corrected through professional calibration. Therefore, we decided to check how the television would perform after such adjustments.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw came to light. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and overly low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one may get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find quite a few functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Calibration allowed us to extract significantly more from the ChooseTV 3 than we could have expected at first. Firstly, it was possible to address the lack of blue, which had previously caused a noticeable warming of the image. After a slight adjustment to the white balance, most of the errors in the Color Checker measurements for SDR content practically disappeared. The shades of white became more natural, and the brightness management in gamma stabilised to a nearly perfect level, not exceeding the threshold of human eye perception. Therefore, it can confidently be said that in SDR content, after a few adjustments in settings, the ChooseTV 3 performs really brilliantly. Much worse, although still definitely better than before calibration, are the HDR contents. The white balance was brought into order, but the limitations of the IPS panel are insurmountable. The lack of local dimming means that even the smallest elements can be overexposed, which is immediately noticeable. Colour-wise, the effect is also improved, although far from ideal – many errors still exceed the threshold of four, or even five delta E units, meaning they remain visible to the human eye. It was already clear earlier that the ChooseTV 3 is not a television designed to impress with HDR quality. Nonetheless, it is pleasing to note that in SDR content, after calibration, the image can look truly excellent, and in this category, the television positively surprised us.

After professional calibration, it is evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not at all a given. The effects should be evaluated in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the picture looks really good. Most colour errors have fallen below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions usually begin to be visible to the naked eye in measurements. Films, series, sports, and regular television look natural, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be clearly stated that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for reasonable HDR, and calibration changes very little in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: the colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions to expand the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most apparent in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.1/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of the fluidity of tonal transitions, the experience with the Bravia 3 featuring a VA panel is very similar to what we observed in the IPS variant; however, there is one significant factor here – screen uniformity. The VA panel performs significantly better in maintaining image consistency, which immediately translates into a higher rating. This was most easily noticeable in scenes from the film Green Knight. In the IPS version, strong brightening and vignetting practically prevented a proper assessment of the gradation itself, whereas in the 50-inch variant, this issue has been greatly reduced. As for the tonal transitions themselves, the television performs really well. In bright parts of the image, we did not notice any serious errors – the colours blend smoothly without creating artificial contours. In darker scenes, there are also no major issues with colour gradation, and thanks to the more uniform backlighting, the image is considerably more pleasant to view than in the version with the IPS panel. Therefore, it can be said that this is one of those categories in which the Bravia 3 in the 50-inch version performs surprisingly well.

In terms of colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It is hard to have any significant reservations here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means that on a bright background, there are no troubling bands or jumps between shades. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, at that point, quite strong 'stepping' of colours is visible. Instead of smooth transitions, we get clear cut-offs between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite irritating and distract from the film itself, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Bravia 3 brings something more than just a shared name to the Sony television family. It stands out primarily for its ability to enhance the quality of inferior materials thanks to the processor used. Of course, we won't find the advanced XR chip known from more expensive models here, but nevertheless, it's worth noting that the image at lower resolutions looked surprisingly good. The upscaling worked effectively, and most parts of the screen were free from the typical excessive edge tearing characteristic of budget constructions. The feature enhancing the smoothness of tonal transitions is also noteworthy. In the high setting, it performs really well, effectively masking gradation imperfections without significant loss of detail. It does happen, however, that the algorithm overly smooths elements that should remain sharp – for example, faces – but overall, the effect is beneficial. The best results were achieved precisely at the highest setting, and this option could be recommended to those watching lower-quality content.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at low settings. However, it has a drawback: if applied too aggressively, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. Therefore, it would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find a happy medium between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower-resolution materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for nearly all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If it feels too soft for someone, the sharpness slider in the menu can always be adjusted to achieve a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.8/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
26%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

The fluidity of motion has never been a strong point of televisions equipped with 60 Hz panels, and the Bravia 3 is no exception. Nevertheless, Sony has added something that may appeal to those more sensitive to the way images are displayed. This refers to the proprietary motion smoother, Motion Flow, which offers users a considerable amount of adjustment options. With it, one can make the image smoother, even theatrical, or stick to a more cinematic style with the characteristic judder that many associate with a filmic atmosphere. These functions work with content shot at lower frame rates, such as films and series recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second, which is the kind of material we encounter daily. It is precisely at this point that the motion smoother turns out to be one of the most important features in everyday use of the television, and here the Bravia 3 performs quite well.

In this respect, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that is actually the norm, and it is hard to expect anything more. However, the worst part is that the television does not have any features to improve motion smoothness. There is a lack of any supporting systems, both in films and in sports. We must come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw". This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion can appear choppy or unclear. We do not have the option to enable any smoothers that would reduce this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Bravia 3 is not a device for e-sports enthusiasts or fans of late-night marathons with a controller in hand. The lack of 120 Hz refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 ports puts an end to that discussion before it can even begin. This is a television for casual gamers who, after work, will fire up FIFA or racing games, not for someone who measures every frame in a spreadsheet. Nevertheless, Sony has included a few nice extras so that it isn't all so bare. ALLM works as it should, automatically switching the television to game mode (low latency). There's even a simple Game Bar, which is clear and straightforward. However, the biggest curiosity here is the PlayStation Portal app. Thanks to it, you can launch games from the PS5 wirelessly and see them immediately on the television screen. It sounds great, but it only takes a few minutes to feel significant delays. In our opinion, it is more of a showcase of capabilities than something you can use on a daily basis. If someone really wants to play, it is better to connect the console with an HDMI cable and forget about wireless issues.

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming television, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While it is true that we won’t find support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has ensured several important features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience on consoles. The most important of these are the VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from tearing and keeps it consistent even during sudden drops in frame rate while gaming. In contrast, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the television to the lowest latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be summoned on screen at any time. It allows for a quick preview of the current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
12 ms
1080p120
2160p60
12 ms
12 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV

Here, the Bravia 3 showcases its best side. Latencies drop below 12 milliseconds in almost every resolution and mode, so the response to controller movements is instantaneous and there is no feeling of delay. The impression is that the console and the television are speaking the same language, without unnecessary stops and hesitations. The Dolby Vision Gaming mode deserves special attention. In its predecessor, the X75WL model, using this feature was simply a torment – input lag could reach over 100 milliseconds, which effectively took away the enjoyment of gaming. In the Bravia 3, this problem has been completely eliminated.

Another advantage for gamers is the very low input lag of around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so small that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's difficult to notice at all. Playing remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with significantly more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

3.5/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
12ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Collaboration with a computer in the case of Bravia 3 with a VA panel does not perform as well as in the version with an IPS panel. The fonts are clearly less sharp and harder to read, which is immediately noticeable when working with text. Additionally, there is the surprising issue of dithering, which we did not notice in the IPS variant. This is quite an unusual situation, but definitely worth noting, as it may bother those planning to use the television as a monitor. As for PC gaming, there is also not much cause for enthusiasm here. The lack of support for frame synchronization with graphics cards or higher refresh rates makes the screen quite unattractive in this role. Therefore, if someone is seriously considering connecting the Bravia 3 to a computer, the better choice would be the version with an IPS panel, which performs significantly better in this regard.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming possibilities are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles chroma subsampling 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble rendering fonts cleanly.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
70%

The viewing angles in the Bravia 3 with a VA panel are noticeably weaker than in the version with an IPS panel. It is enough to sit slightly to the side for the image to begin to lose its saturation and clarity, and the black starts to take on a lighter shade. This is the natural price one has to pay for the significantly better contrast and deeper black, which are a clear advantage in this variant.

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which is directly due to the use of a VA type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just a slight shift to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image to become noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA): 397 cd/m2

The performance of the Bravia 3 in the VA variant during the day is a mix of pros and cons. The manufacturer has also applied a satin coating here, but compared to IPS, it struggles more with direct reflections. When sharp light hits the screen, reflections can be more pronounced and may interfere with viewing. On the other hand, the television makes up for this with higher brightness. In typical daylight conditions, the image is more readable and clearer than in the version with the IPS panel. As a result, in everyday use, the Bravia 3 in the VA edition can perform even better, provided it is not placed in a heavily sunlit location.

In a sunlit room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all due to the fact that the panel is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin coating of the screen does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not so prominent on the panel, but it is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be rather unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
6120600301
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

TV features

6.1/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

Smart TV Features

The greatest advantage of the Bravia 3 in everyday use is the presence of the Google TV system. It is thanks to this that we have access to one of the largest libraries of applications and streaming services, so regardless of whether someone mainly uses Netflix, Disney+ or smaller platforms, everything is within easy reach. The Google voice assistant also worked very well, responding to our commands quite "smartly". The Google TV system should theoretically operate very smoothly, as Sony has been implementing it better than many cheaper competitors for years. Unfortunately, in the case of the Bravia 3, it is not as great as we would expect. During tests, we noticed slight stutters in the interface, and some functions, such as screen mirroring, simply refused to work. One might get the impression that the processor in this model sometimes struggles to cope with the demanding system, and not everything works as smoothly as we would hope.

Classic Features

Even in the cheapest series, Sony manages to remind us of its experience with various users. The set includes two remote controls. The first is modern and minimalist, with a small number of buttons, which works great for using applications and Google TV functions. The second is a classic remote with a more extensive set of buttons and a numerical keypad, which will be especially appreciated by older individuals accustomed to traditional solutions. This is a nice gesture towards different user groups, and it must be said that Sony has solved this very practically. It is a pity, however, that compared to the X75WL model, the ability to record content from television tuners to USB memory has disappeared. The manufacturer has completely abandoned this feature, so anyone attached to it will unfortunately not find it in the Bravia 3.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still quite a new operating system and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. Everything functions sluggishly and at times, clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth/RF. This means that we need to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we still could not activate the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting images from Apple devices using the AirPlay function went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very limited application library. The selection is significantly smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programmes is nearly unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 could be a good choice for those who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic programme guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which makes it much easier to operate after dark, and has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting feature is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home cinema systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Apps

9.6/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.6/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Here Sony has done a really good job. The built-in player works quickly and doesn't "grumble" when launching different formats. We didn't have to reach for external applications like VLC, as the television handled even files that can cause quite a few issues on other models – such as HEIC photos from Apple devices. It's a little thing, but one that shows the manufacturer wanted the user to feel complete convenience. By plugging in a film on a USB drive or holiday photos on an external hard drive, you can simply connect them and watch right away on the big screen. No fuss, no installing additional software, no searching for workarounds. It's truly a rarity in televisions, and we must admit that in this aspect the Bravia 3 really surprised us pleasantly.

The built-in media player works quite efficiently and handles most popular video formats without significant issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a hard drive or USB stick should not feel constrained. The only drawback concerns the photo browser - not everything functioned correctly, and some files, especially at selected resolutions, did not open at all.

Sound

6.5/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    88dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Bravia 3 plays in quite a flat manner, but makes up for it with volume. It's perfect for watching classic television, as the dialogues are clear and the mid-tones are well audible. Older users, who primarily care about speech intelligibility, will particularly appreciate this type of characteristic. However, if someone expects something more from the sound, such as stronger bass or a wider soundstage, it is still worth reaching for a soundbar. The television supports modern codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, so an external sound system can easily utilise their potential. This ensures that with relatively little expenditure, one can achieve a much fuller and more engaging sound.

The sound quality is distinctly budget-level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programmes, but when it comes to films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. It's hard to expect anything more at this price, so if better experiences are important to us, it's worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even via the headphone output.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC