The Sony Bravia 2 II is a television that performs best in simple, everyday use. And we suspect many people will choose it mainly because of Google TV. The system provides access to a huge number of apps and streaming services, and it also includes Chromecast, AirPlay and convenient voice search. The set itself may not run as quickly as more expensive Sony models, but in terms of features there is little to complain about. Importantly, for ordinary viewing the picture quality is quite decent. The Bravia 2 II handles SDR material particularly well, meaning regular TV, YouTube and much of older films and series. The factory Cinema mode is already fairly well tuned, colours look natural and, without much fiddling with the settings, you can simply start watching. And in our view this is where the Bravia 2 II shows its best side, as a simple Smart TV for everyday use rather than a television that aims to impress with the panel's capabilities.
However, you should remember that the word "Bravia" on the casing does not automatically mean excellent picture quality. The Bravia 2 II uses an IPS panel with very low contrast, and that is its biggest problem. During the day this is not such a big issue, but switch the lights off in the evening and the blacks start to look more like dark grey. Of course, in return you get good viewing angles, so if the TV sits in a large living room and is watched by several people from different positions, IPS has its advantage. But that comes at the cost of weak blacks. This is also not a television made with HDR impact or more demanding gamers in mind. About 300 nits of brightness and a narrow colour gamut mean HDR material does not show much more than what we see in SDR. The 60 Hz panel and the lack of broader gaming features also clearly show that gaming is not a priority for this model.
And it wouldn't really be a big problem, because we expected exactly that from an entry-level Sony model. However, the biggest issue for the Bravia 2 II is its price. For similar money you can easily find competing TVs, especially from Korean and Chinese brands, that already offer much more, from 120 Hz panels to Mini-LED backlighting with local dimming. So the Bravia 2 II is not a bad television in itself. It's simply too expensive for what it offers. If its price were noticeably lower, as a simple TV for everyday viewing it would make much more sense.
Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals mainly for one thing: Ambilight. The light that follows the picture and spreads across the wall can change the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening the screen seems to extend beyond its borders and watching simply gains extra charm. For some it will be a pleasant extra, for others a sufficient reason to choose Philips again. The picture itself is very comparable to what models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H offer when using the same type of panel. So you get deep, perfect blacks on which bright elements make a strong impression. The OLED811 can deliver powerful HDR and, importantly, after calibration the picture itself is close to the reference. There is no big advantage over the competition, but there is also no feeling that by choosing Philips for Ambilight you are sacrificing image quality.
There are also a few good changes for gamers compared with last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset we finally have four HDMI 2.1 ports, so connecting several devices, for example consoles, a PC and a soundbar, no longer requires choosing which device will get the full capabilities of the port. Gaming itself is very enjoyable — the television responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates, and from a PC allows gaming in 4K at 165 Hz. It’s a pity that the new processor’s capabilities were not put to equally good use when processing lower-quality sources. The biggest concern, however, is the operating system. Titan OS replaced the popular Google TV and although it has clearly developed over the past year, it is still hard to call the change a positive one. The system runs more smoothly, has more useful features, and the app library already contains most popular streaming services. Nevertheless, the selection of apps is still much smaller than with Google or the competition, and in our view that remains the OLED811’s biggest drawback. People who use less popular services may particularly feel this difference.
Is it worth buying? Yes, if Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture and gaming capabilities the OLED811 has as much to offer as its rivals, but Ambilight gives it something others do not. So Philips both gives and takes. It adds a unique viewing atmosphere but limits freedom of app choice. If the apps you use are available, that compromise may be worth making.