Sharp FQ8 vs XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Direct compare

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.4

5.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.2

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.2

    5.1

  • Gaming on console

    7.4

    6.2

  • TV as a computer monitor

    3.0

    1.0

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    3.8

  • Utility functions

    6.5

    6.5

  • Apps

    10.0

    10.0

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    6.0

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Smooth tonal transitions

  • 120 Hz panel

  • Advanced features for gamers

  • Low input lag

  • Harman/Kardon signature audio

  • Advanced Google TV operating system

  • Voice control in Polish

  • Good image processing

  • High native contrast

  • Attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision IQ does not work properly

  • Average panel response time

  • Poor font readability when connected to PC

  • Low brightness

  • Poor font readability

  • The system can lag

Our verdict

Sharp FQ8 is a television that offers many advantages that distinguish it in its price class. First and foremost, it is equipped with the Google TV operating system, which provides access to a vast number of applications and a user-friendly interface. The matrix with a refresh rate of 120 Hz ensures high fluidity of the image, and combined with low input lag, makes this model a good choice for gamers. The high native contrast means that blacks are deep and vivid. The television also achieves a decent brightness level of 450 nits, allowing for comfortable viewing of HDR content, especially as it supports advanced formats such as Dolby Vision. The television also offers wide color gamut coverage, thanks to the implementation of quantum dots (Quantum Dot/QLED). On the other hand, Sharp FQ8 has a few drawbacks. The lack of control over dynamic tone mapping in HDR mode may be an issue for more demanding users. Although Dolby Vision IQ is present in this model, it's hard to speak of its positive performance here. Additionally, the matrix response time is average, which can affect the clarity of dynamic scenes, and poor viewing angles mean that watching from the side significantly reduces image quality. Nevertheless, Sharp FQ8 is a great television that combines affordable quality and smooth image at a good price. Although it is not without flaws, it can satisfy most users who are looking for a reasonably priced television with a 120 Hz matrix and a pleasant audio system.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is an affordable QLED model that works well as a basic television in the home. The Google TV operating system deserves attention. Thanks to it, one can easily use apps like Netflix and YouTube. The interface is clear and user-friendly, and the ability to search by voice in Polish allows for quick access to content of interest. The picture on the A Pro 2025 is sufficient for everyday television watching or film viewing. Smooth tonal transitions and the enhancement of older materials make even lower resolution content look good. However, the screen brightness may disappoint in very sunny rooms – here the television performs mediocrely, but it fares much better in a dimly lit room. The television is rather suitable for occasional gaming. Low input lag ensures quick response, which is important for dynamic games. However, the 60 Hz panel and lack of more advanced features may not appeal to gamers seeking perfect image fluidity. On the other hand, A Pro 2025 may be sufficient for those who play from time to time. Not everything works perfectly. When connecting the television to a computer, the fonts are difficult to read, which can hinder text work. The Google TV system itself can be a bit slow, which sometimes complicates the quick switching of applications. Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a simple and functional television that is suitable for daily television viewing and using apps. It has its flaws, such as average brightness and font readability issues, but at this price, it offers quite a lot. It is a good choice for those looking for budget equipment for basic uses.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

6.2/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,200:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,700:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,100:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Sharp FQ8, thanks to its VA panel, offers a very high native contrast ratio, achieving an impressive score of 8100:1 in tests with cinematic test patterns. It is worth noting that this result stands out very positively against competing models and is very rarely encountered. This means that the image gains an appropriate depth in scenes with distinct differences between light and dark elements, which is particularly important when assessing contrast and black quality, as these are key criteria in image analysis. The Sharp FQ8 panel uses direct backlighting (Direct LED), however, it does not support local dimming. In this price category, this is understandable, although it affects the depth of black and clarity in darker scenes like that from the film Sicario 2, which can be seen below.

Xiaomi A Pro is equipped with a VA matrix, which inherently offers significantly better black depth and colour intensity compared to IPS panels, especially in dimly lit conditions. Based on the conducted tests, the contrast measurement tool indicated a maximum value of around 6000:1. This is a solid result, ensuring good separation of image elements in darker scenes. An example can be the film Oblivion, where the television performed excellently in separating light and dark areas, enhancing the visual effects. Unfortunately, the television does not support local dimming technology, which is an obvious fact in this price range. This becomes particularly evident in more challenging scenes, such as those from the film Sicario 2. In such moments, the black loses intensity and starts to resemble a rather navy shade. The lack of dynamic dimming of image segments causes details that should be deeply darkened to remain slightly illuminated.

HDR effect quality

5.3/10

3.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 74.6%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 70.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

384 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

399 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

465 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

461 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

463 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

243 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

213 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Sharp FQ8

Sharp FQ8 can achieve a maximum brightness exceeding 450 nits, which is a satisfactory result. Although it may seem that this value is not impressive, it still places it among the top televisions in this price range. In our opinion, this is also a value from which we will feel the richness of the image and the operation of any metadata, which cannot be said about darker devices. The television supports the advanced HDR format known as Dolby Vision. It is also equipped with DOLBY Vision IQ technology, which stands out for its ability to automatically adjust brightness and image colours based on the lighting conditions in the room. Unfortunately, it has been poorly implemented, resulting in significant inaccuracies such as artificial brightening of the image. Therefore, we do not recommend using this technology in this model. Additionally, the colour gamut coverage is around 94% thanks to the use of quantum dot technology, enabling vibrant and realistic colours. This set of features ensures that the image is not only intense but also full of details.

In the HDR category, the television Xiaomi A Pro is, to put it plainly, lacking. Under ideal conditions, it offers brightness at around 250 nits. This is a poor result; however, in this price range, many competing models offer similar or lower values. Such brightness is too low to fully realise the potential of HDR content. In practice, this means that the image does not gain the appropriate depth and intensity expected from high-quality HDR. These values are more characteristic of standard dynamic range (SDR), which means that the true HDR effect remains beyond the reach of this model, and scenes that should stand out with spectacular brightness and contrast seem flat and lacklustre. However, for its price, the television offers good coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut at 92%, thanks to the use of quantum dot technology (specifically PFS LED). This results in vibrant and saturated colours, which will appeal particularly to gamers and film enthusiasts who appreciate richer shades and better colour reproduction compared to traditional televisions without this technology.

Factory color reproduction

4.2/10

5.1/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The colour reproduction test in Sharp FQ8 was conducted in film mode, which out of the box offers the best visual capabilities, providing viewers with a colour experience closest to reality. Nevertheless, it cannot be described as exceptional, as there are still some shortcomings that affect the overall picture quality. Colour reproduction in Sharp FQ8 for HD content demonstrates significant issues with white balance. On the graph, the red line clearly rises, indicating excessive dominance of the red colour. This is also confirmed by tests using colour samples, which show that many colours deviate towards red. For example, in a scene from a film featuring a child, the image is very warm and unnaturally red. Similar difficulties occur with 4K HDR content, where there is also noticeable excessive presence of the red colour. It is worth noting this, especially for those who value faithful colour reproduction.

Regarding contrast for SDR, at the beginning of the gamma graph there is a strange characteristic, suggesting issues with reproduction. Subsequently, the entire line is below the reference line, indicating that the television does not achieve appropriate brightness and contrast values in standard content. Meanwhile, the EOTF curve for 4K HDR shows significant discrepancies. Such fluctuations indicate difficulties in maintaining consistent brightness reproduction, leading to unpleasant visual effects when viewing HDR content.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 television has been tested in movie mode, which offers the best colour reproduction straight out of the box. However, it is worth noting that it is not free from flaws. Analysing the white balance, it can be observed that the values for green are in the negative. This phenomenon leads to some distortions in the shades of white, and with pure white, the graph shows clear deviations. The over-contrasted image results in inappropriate tonal transitions in red, negatively affecting the quality of colour display. Generally, in the image below, it can be seen that the overall scenery before calibration acquires pink hues. Additionally, when analysing gamma contrast, the graph is significantly below the 2.4 value, suggesting that the television overly emphasises dark tones, and the brighter areas of the image may be less vivid. Furthermore, the EOTF curve shows a strong peak at the beginning, which can lead to a loss of detail in bright scenes and an unpleasant feeling of over-drawing. These aspects indicate a need for further calibration to achieve a more balanced colour reproduction and improve the overall image quality. Users who expect precise colour reproduction may be forced to take measures to adjust the television settings to achieve more realistic and natural visual results. In the xiaomi tv a pro 2025, the factory colour settings in Xiaomi are average and may require calibration. After proper colour adjustment, the image gains a natural and vibrant colour palette, much closer to cinematic standards. It is worth adding that the issue of inaccurate colour reproduction is typical for many televisions in this class, meaning it is not a flaw unique to the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV. For those who value perfect colour reproduction, professional calibration will prove to be a key element that enhances the overall image quality.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

7/10

After calibration, for SDR content, the white balance on Sharp FQ8 has been significantly improved, and all lines have come much closer to the reference line. Of course, they are not perfectly straight, but it's hard to expect better results from a television in this price range; they are really very good. Improving white balance means that colours are more natural and accurately reproduced, which positively impacts the overall visual experience. In terms of gamma, the strange jump at the beginning of the graph has not been eliminated, however, after this error, the entire line is much closer to the expected effect.

For HDR content, the white balance is somewhat worse compared to SDR content, but it is still significantly better than before calibration. It is worth noting that the improvement in white balance in HDR contributes to a more consistent and pleasant perception of colours, even though there may still be shortcomings. Regarding the EOTF graph and the associated contrast, our specialists noted that the lack of control over dynamic tone mapping settings hindered the achievement of significant improvement in this area. This leads to uneven brightness representation.

Despite the shortcomings resulting from the inability to adjust settings for dynamic tone mapping, Sharp FQ8 has gained a new perspective after proper calibrations. The improved white balance and better colour reproduction in SDR mode make the image more natural and pleasing to the eye. Although there are still areas for improvement, especially in HDR content, the television offers satisfying visual experiences, making it a noteworthy choice in its price range.

Now it's time to check how the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 television has performed after calibration. The biggest beneficiary of this process is the white balance. After the calibration was conducted, all previous errors were corrected in both HD and 4K content, and most errors no longer fall significantly outside the value of "2". This means a much more balanced and natural colour representation, which certainly affects the viewing comfort. In terms of gamma, the drop was significantly reduced, resulting in a more consistent tonal representation across various scenes. Nevertheless, the EOTF curve has not been significantly improved due to a lack of effective control over dynamic tone mapping. This limitation means that there are still some issues with detail reproduction in bright scenes, which may affect the perception of certain materials. However, despite these minor shortcomings, the overall shape of the image is definitely better after calibration. The television has gained in quality, and the improved white balance along with reduced gamma issues allows users to enjoy a more realistic and pleasant visual experience. Further adjustment of settings may enhance image quality even more, but even now the television demonstrates its capabilities, meeting the expectations of many users.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.8/10

9.3/10

When it comes to the fluidity of tonal transitions, Sharp FQ8 television performs excellently, presenting very nice transitions in all the tested movie scenes. Colours blend harmoniously, which significantly impacts the picture quality. The only aspect that can be pointed out is a slightly noticeable gradation towards black and in the scene with a colourful sunset against the mountains. However, these minor imperfections do not detract from the overall positive visual experience that the television offers.

During the fluidity tests of tonal transitions on the Xiaomi A Pro 2025, the gradation proved to be close to perfect. In most of the test sequences, there were no noticeable issues. Only in the scene with red water did very cosmetic imperfections appear, which, however, have little impact on the overall image quality. Both colourful and grey gradients were reproduced with almost perfect precision, making this television model a very good choice for those who pay attention to this particular feature of a TV.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

6.9/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

The "10-bit colour reproduction" feature in Sharp FQ8 performs reasonably well, as we can see in the image with bulbs that shows slight connections between grey shades. For the best results, it is recommended to set medium, which does not reveal issues with grain smoothing or blurring of essential image elements. Alternatively, the "low" setting also proves to be safer and delivers positive effects.

As for upscaling, the Sharp FQ8 television plays back video without overscan, allowing for full use of the screen. The branches shown in the image are noticeably jagged, while the edges of the trousers appear without clear jaggedness, positively affecting the overall image quality. Additionally, the television offers an AI Super Resolution feature, which artificially sharpens jagged elements, enhancing their clarity.

How does the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 television cope with tonal transitions, especially with lower-quality materials? Thanks to advanced digital processing, the colour contour removal function works surprisingly well. We recommend setting this option to "Medium" – the television significantly improves the fluidity of tonal transitions while avoiding excessive smoothing of other image elements, such as film grain.

In the case of the tested image featuring a model and numerous branches in the background, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 showcased its capabilities in terms of digital processing. Adding artificial sharpness to this scene made the details of the model more pronounced, and her hair appeared more detailed. However, delicate contours appeared around the branches in the background, which were a result of digital interference. Although this enhances the overall impression of detail, excessive sharpness can make some elements of the image seem unnaturally emphasised.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.2/10

4.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Sharp FQ8 is equipped with a 120 Hz panel, with the possibility of achieving 144 Hz on PC, which in theory should translate to smooth motion rendering. The television offers functions for improving the smoothness of films and reducing motion blur, which is important for more dynamic content. However, the lack of Black Frame Insertion (BFI) technology combined with an average response time of the panel does not yield positive results. The effect is slight blurring of moving objects, and this may be more noticeable when watching sports or during intense gaming.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers a motion smoothing feature called "Motion Smoothing," which primarily works in films. It can be adjusted to prefer either a more cinematic, film-like effect with visible frames, or a smoother, theatre-like image. This function should satisfy those who intend to watch mainly films on it. However, gamers and sports fans may feel disappointed. The 60 Hz refresh rate panel, typical in this price range, does not impress. Our "Ufo" test revealed some motion blur. Those expecting better sharpness of moving objects may be slightly let down.

Console compatibility and gaming features

7.1/10

3.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Warning Tak (wysoki input lag)
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

Sharp FQ8 offers several significant features dedicated to gamers that can enhance the gameplay experience. First and foremost, the television is equipped with HDMI 2.1, which comes with certain advantages. ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode) switches the television to a mode with minimal input lag when a gaming device is detected. VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) reduces screen stutter by adjusting the refresh rate to the number of frames generated by the console or computer, providing smoother experiences, especially in dynamic games. Additionally, the television supports G-Sync technology, which synchronises the image with the graphics card, eliminating stuttering and screen tearing. Despite these advantages, FQ8 also has some limitations. The lack of support for HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) means that the television does not optimise dynamic range for HDR games. The Dolby Vision mode, although theoretically offering better image quality in games supporting this format, suffers from very high input lag.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers several features useful for gamers, including Game Bar, which is different from the typical "dashboards" with interfaces found in other manufacturers' products. Thanks to this, users can quickly access game-related settings, which is convenient during intense sessions. The TV also supports Automatic Low Latency Mode (ALLM), meaning it automatically switches to a mode optimised for gaming, reducing signal latency. Unfortunately, it lacks support for HDMI 2.1, limiting its capabilities for connecting the latest gaming consoles that may require higher bandwidth. Additionally, the TV does not support features such as VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) or G-Sync, which are increasingly desired by gamers, as they allow for smoother visuals and eliminate tearing. For these reasons, although Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has some features for gamers, in this price range, better options can be found that offer more advanced solutions dedicated to gamers.

Input lag

9.1/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
15 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
16 ms
15 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
128 ms
2160p120 DV
20 ms

Generally, the input lag in Sharp FQ8 is very good, achieving below 16 ms for each tested resolution, making the television suitable for gaming, providing smooth and quick response. However, when Dolby Vision mode is enabled and the refresh rate is 60 Hz, the input lag increases sharply. This significantly worsens responsiveness, which can be particularly troublesome in dynamic games where precision and speed of reaction are crucial.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 achieves remarkable results, regardless of the resolution or HDR mode. With measurements at just 15 ms, this television ranks among the top in terms of responsiveness.

Compatibility with PC

3/10

1/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Poor
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
17ms
105ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The cooperation of the television Sharp FQ8 with the PC unfortunately leaves a lot to be desired, despite the low input lag. The main problems arise from the lack of full support for chroma 4:4:4 at a resolution of 4K and 120 Hz, which results in blurry text and details in computer graphics. Additionally, the applied subpixel arrangement of BGR, instead of standard RGB, makes fonts less readable and can appear fuzzy.

In the category of cooperation with PC, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs very poorly. The fonts are of low quality, and their display on the screen is often problematic. Dithering is ubiquitous; when the fonts are enlarged on a dark background, they are displayed in three colours, which is definitely glaring and can significantly hinder comfortable use of the device. Such problems can be a significant downside for users who plan to use the television as a computer monitor.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

2.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
84%
81%

The viewing angles on the Sharp FQ8 are quite poor, which is a result of the use of a VA panel. When watching from a wider angle, the television significantly loses brightness, and colours quickly lose their saturation. As a result, the image becomes washed out, and details less clear, which can be problematic if you plan to watch television with a larger group or from different positions in the room.

In the category of viewing angles, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 with a VA panel performs quite poorly. Although you can enjoy better blacks when viewed head-on, from side perspectives, the image loses quality. Our specialists noticed during the testing of the television that sitting a metre away from the device, the image on the right side appeared brightened and desaturated. However, moving a bit to the side improves everything, which demonstrates the significant difference in image reception depending on the viewing angle. All of this means that the experience of watching in a larger group may be less satisfying.

TV efficiency during daytime

5.4/10

3.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

XIAOMI A PRO 2025: 249 cd/m2

Sharp FQ8: 440 cd/m2

Sharp FQ8 performs quite well in daytime lighting conditions. The panel reaches a brightness level of 440 nits, which, combined with the satin screen coating, results in satisfactory visibility even in bright light. Importantly, the television does not have issues displaying the colour black during the day, which ensures that darker scenes remain readable and do not lose depth, despite the bright surroundings.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 presents itself as average. The panel coating is satin, which may help reduce reflections, but the suppression of glare is average. The brightness of the television is only 250 nits, which is a relatively low result compared to other models on the market. As a result, on sunny days or in brightly lit rooms, the picture quality may suffer, and details may be difficult to perceive.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
v1.17
RTM5.220609.003.1850
Image processor
mt5889
M7632 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Sharp FQ8

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

TV features

6.5/10

6.5/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Google TV
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    RF
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

Sharp FQ8 is equipped with a modern Google TV system that provides access to a wide range of applications, such as Netflix, YouTube, Prime Video and Disney+. Additionally, the television supports voice control in Polish, making navigation and quick access to content easier. The FQ8 also offers the ability to connect multiple devices, such as keyboards, mice, Bluetooth headphones, and other accessories.

Despite these advantages, the television has certain limitations. The lack of television recording features and picture-in-picture (PiP) support may be a downside for those using these options. Additionally, Apple device users may feel the lack of compatibility with AirPlay, making it difficult to easily stream content from an iPhone or iPad to the television.

In terms of functionality, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 stands out with the Google TV system, which is one of its biggest advantages. This allows users access to a wide range of apps and streaming services, greatly enhancing the convenience of using the television. The Google TV system also offers a voice assistant that simplifies navigation and allows for quick content searches without the need to browse through menus. One of the key benefits of this system is the ability to download virtually unlimited applications from the Google Play Store, enabling users to personalise the television according to their individual needs. Users can install streaming apps, games, and various tools, making the television a multimedia entertainment hub. However, it is worth noting that this model does not have recording functions or AirPlay, which may be disappointing for some users. Additionally, there are quite significant lags in the operating system, affecting user experience. On the plus side, it is also possible to pair other peripheral devices via Bluetooth, and the remote control does not require aiming at the screen, which significantly improves usability. Despite some shortcomings, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has the potential to satisfy the needs of users looking for a modern television.

Playing files from USB

9.4/10

6.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Thanks to the Google TV system, Sharp FQ8 offers great flexibility in playing files from USB. Users can install various applications for image and sound playback, such as VLC or MX Player, which enables the television to handle most popular file formats with ease. Whether it's movies, music, or photos, support for multiple formats ensures comfortable and hassle-free use of multimedia from external storage devices.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers a decent built-in media player that meets basic user expectations. However, the television has its drawbacks and sometimes encounters issues with playing certain file formats, which can be frustrating. Fortunately, with access to the Google Play Store, users can easily download alternative players that better meet their needs. In our test of the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2025, we demonstrated that its compatibility with applications is high, and additional media playback apps work flawlessly. It is also worth noting that the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2025 is equipped with the Android TV platform, allowing access to a wide range of applications and streaming services. Installing alternative media players improves the overall functionality of the device and eliminates compatibility issues with formats. As a result, the Xiaomi A Pro becomes a more versatile television that can meet the diverse expectations of users, even those with higher demands when it comes to media playback.

Apps

10/10

10/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi

Sound

6/10

6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    6/10
    6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    Yes

The sound assessment of the Sharp FQ8 is of course subjective, yet there are a few aspects worth highlighting. The television is equipped with a soundbar directed straight towards the user, branded by Harman/Kardon. Although it is not a full-fledged soundbar or home theatre system, the speaker arrangement clearly enhances the audio experience, delivering a clearer and more direct sound, which will certainly be a beneficial solution for everyday television viewing. It is also worth noting that the television was capable of achieving very high volume levels, which will definitely assist those who have some sort of hearing difficulty. The only remark we encountered was related to the sound processing by Dolby, which caused quite noticeable sound distortions and artificial clipping.

When it comes to sound, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is impressively positive, especially considering its price. The sound quality is truly solid, and the audio does not deviate from what one would expect in this class. Additionally, the television supports DTS audio formats, which are often lacking in much more expensive TVs. It is worth noting that this assessment is subjective and may vary depending on individual preferences.