Sharp FQ8 vs Philips MLED920 / MLED910

Direct comparison

MLED920 / MLED910

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.4

6.5

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.2

    6.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.2

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    7.4

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    3.0

    4.0

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    5.5

  • Utility functions

    6.5

    5.5

  • Apps

    9.6

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    6.2

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Smooth tonal transitions

  • 120 Hz panel

  • Advanced features for gamers

  • Low input lag

  • Harman/Kardon signature audio

  • Deep black and high contrast thanks to mini-LED backlighting

  • HDR brightness reaching 700–800 nits in real film scenes

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Ambilight – an element that adds atmosphere, especially in the evening

  • A wide range of supported audio formats: DTS:X, Dolby Atmos, Dolby True HD 7.1

  • 144 Hz panel with support for VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Loud sound (up to 88 dB)

  • Illuminated remote control

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision IQ does not work properly

  • Average panel response time

  • Poor font readability when connected to PC

  • Titan OS is quite underdeveloped – there are significant bugs and missing features in the applications

  • Few user functions

  • Hybrid infrared remote control

  • Issues with the fluidity of tonal transitions in dark scenes

  • The television is not suitable (other than for gaming) for use with a PC – strong dithering and poor readability of fonts, especially coloured ones and on dark backgrounds

Our verdict

Sharp FQ8 is a television that offers many advantages that distinguish it in its price class. First and foremost, it is equipped with the Google TV operating system, which provides access to a vast number of applications and a user-friendly interface. The matrix with a refresh rate of 120 Hz ensures high fluidity of the image, and combined with low input lag, makes this model a good choice for gamers. The high native contrast means that blacks are deep and vivid. The television also achieves a decent brightness level of 450 nits, allowing for comfortable viewing of HDR content, especially as it supports advanced formats such as Dolby Vision. The television also offers wide color gamut coverage, thanks to the implementation of quantum dots (Quantum Dot/QLED). On the other hand, Sharp FQ8 has a few drawbacks. The lack of control over dynamic tone mapping in HDR mode may be an issue for more demanding users. Although Dolby Vision IQ is present in this model, it's hard to speak of its positive performance here. Additionally, the matrix response time is average, which can affect the clarity of dynamic scenes, and poor viewing angles mean that watching from the side significantly reduces image quality. Nevertheless, Sharp FQ8 is a great television that combines affordable quality and smooth image at a good price. Although it is not without flaws, it can satisfy most users who are looking for a reasonably priced television with a 120 Hz matrix and a pleasant audio system.

The Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year's model PML9000, but it is not a repetition of the past. It is clear that the manufacturer has done their homework – primarily, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year could significantly ruin the viewing experience. Now, blacks and contrast look much better, and with Dolby Vision present here, even HDR content appears quite decent. The picture can sometimes shine where it should, without straining the eyes during difficult scenes. Undoubtedly, the biggest asset of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a completely new atmosphere – the screen seems to extend beyond its borders, and the entire room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that not only cinema enthusiasts will appreciate but also gamers, who, alongside the lights, receive a full set of features typical for modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. However. Indeed, there is a significant however – here we reach the most difficult part of this verdict – it is still a dual-purpose device. On one hand, we have a strong picture and a unique Ambilight feature, while on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a considerable hindrance, full of bugs and deficiencies, which cause the television to lag behind the competition. On top of that, the price is not low at all given the offered capabilities. Therefore, it is difficult to recommend it unambiguously to everyone. However, if you are looking for the brightest Philips screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of gamer features, and basic applications – the MLED920 will be quite a suitable choice.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.2/10

7.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 144 (12 x 12)

Contrast:

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,200:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,700:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,100:1

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

298,900:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

38,500:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

23,950:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail
Review Sharp FQ8 Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Sharp FQ8, thanks to its VA panel, offers a very high native contrast ratio, achieving an impressive score of 8100:1 in tests with cinematic test patterns. It is worth noting that this result stands out very positively against competing models and is very rarely encountered. This means that the image gains an appropriate depth in scenes with distinct differences between light and dark elements, which is particularly important when assessing contrast and black quality, as these are key criteria in image analysis. The Sharp FQ8 panel uses direct backlighting (Direct LED), however, it does not support local dimming. In this price category, this is understandable, although it affects the depth of black and clarity in darker scenes like that from the film Sicario 2, which can be seen below.

The Philips MLED920 in the 55-inch version that we had the opportunity to test features a VA panel with high contrast. The panel itself is one thing, but the true distinguishing feature of this model is the mini-LED backlighting. This largely determines how black levels and contrast appear – and it must be said that Philips has made a significant leap forward compared to the models from 2024, where the local dimming algorithms were simply mediocre. The new version is much improved, and the contrast presented by the MLED920 can truly surprise positively. At times, it resembles the level known from the best LCD televisions on the market – blacks can be deep, the picture gains a sense of three-dimensionality, and watching films in a dark room makes a great impression. Of course, as with any mini-LED television, this is not a picture completely free of compromises. With a large amount of fine details on the screen, local dimming algorithms can sometimes get confused – at times dimming details more than we would like, and at other times brightening the background, resulting in slight, light blue halos around objects (the so-called halo effect). Despite these imperfections, we must emphasise that black levels and contrast are truly a strong point of the Philips MLED920 and definitely one of the reasons why it should be considered in the mid-range category.

HDR effect quality

5.3/10

5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 74.6%
DCI P3: 89.9%, Bt.2020: 65.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

384 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

399 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

465 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

461 nit

Review Sharp FQ8 Brightness measurement

Result

463 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

722 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

775 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

131 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Sharp FQ8 HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Sharp FQ8 HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Sharp FQ8 HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Sharp FQ8 HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

HDR luminance

Sharp FQ8

HDR luminance

Sharp FQ8 can achieve a maximum brightness exceeding 450 nits, which is a satisfactory result. Although it may seem that this value is not impressive, it still places it among the top televisions in this price range. In our opinion, this is also a value from which we will feel the richness of the image and the operation of any metadata, which cannot be said about darker devices. The television supports the advanced HDR format known as Dolby Vision. It is also equipped with DOLBY Vision IQ technology, which stands out for its ability to automatically adjust brightness and image colours based on the lighting conditions in the room. Unfortunately, it has been poorly implemented, resulting in significant inaccuracies such as artificial brightening of the image. Therefore, we do not recommend using this technology in this model. Additionally, the colour gamut coverage is around 94% thanks to the use of quantum dot technology, enabling vibrant and realistic colours. This set of features ensures that the image is not only intense but also full of details.

Philips MLED920 in our measurements in static tests even reached around 900 nits, which is really a solid result for a mid-range model. In practice, this translates to a lot of satisfaction during viewing sessions – in scenes rich in bright light, such as the first, third or fifth test slide, the screen managed to generate about 700 nits, which is sufficient to feel the true "HDR effect." However, it cannot be denied that the limited number of dimming zones and the compromises typical of mini-LEDs in more demanding scenes reveal their nature. In sequences with small light sources – like the moon or a scene from the film Sicario 2 – the television clearly prioritises maintaining deeper blacks at the expense of the brightness of these small elements. For most viewers, this is still a reasonable compromise, as the dark background looks significantly better, though it is important to be aware that the details themselves may not impress with their intensity. There is also a certain sense of dissatisfaction regarding the colours. Although the applied PFS filter (the equivalent of quantum dots known from QLEDs) does its job and the colours appear quite vivid, the coverage of the DCI-P3 palette reaches “only” 90%. In everyday viewing, this will be sufficient, but in extremely colourful productions – like the latest Disney animations – one can notice that some tones are not as vibrant as they could be in other setups.

Factory color reproduction

4.2/10

5/10

Review Sharp FQ8 Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Sharp FQ8 Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The colour reproduction test in Sharp FQ8 was conducted in film mode, which out of the box offers the best visual capabilities, providing viewers with a colour experience closest to reality. Nevertheless, it cannot be described as exceptional, as there are still some shortcomings that affect the overall picture quality. Colour reproduction in Sharp FQ8 for HD content demonstrates significant issues with white balance. On the graph, the red line clearly rises, indicating excessive dominance of the red colour. This is also confirmed by tests using colour samples, which show that many colours deviate towards red. For example, in a scene from a film featuring a child, the image is very warm and unnaturally red. Similar difficulties occur with 4K HDR content, where there is also noticeable excessive presence of the red colour. It is worth noting this, especially for those who value faithful colour reproduction.

Regarding contrast for SDR, at the beginning of the gamma graph there is a strange characteristic, suggesting issues with reproduction. Subsequently, the entire line is below the reference line, indicating that the television does not achieve appropriate brightness and contrast values in standard content. Meanwhile, the EOTF curve for 4K HDR shows significant discrepancies. Such fluctuations indicate difficulties in maintaining consistent brightness reproduction, leading to unpleasant visual effects when viewing HDR content.

Like every Philips television we tested, we primarily assessed the MLED920 in Filmmaker mode – this is meant to be the "most honest" mode, designed for films and to faithfully convey the intentions of the creators. Indeed, in terms of colour reproduction, it performs the best among all the modes available on the television, but it is not without flaws. The first thing that catches the eye is the white balance. The image has a slight tendency towards purple-pink tones, which gives it a somewhat unnatural character. An even bigger problem, however, turned out to be what we mentioned earlier – image blooming. Just looking at the gamma or EOTF charts reveals that the line significantly deviates from the norm, dropping below a value of 1.8. In practice, this means "bleeding" of the brightest whites, where the image becomes almost milky. Fortunately, most of these issues can be corrected – the MLED920 responds well to calibration, and with a few adjustments, one can significantly improve the viewing experience.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

7.5/10

Review Sharp FQ8 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Sharp FQ8 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, for SDR content, the white balance on Sharp FQ8 has been significantly improved, and all lines have come much closer to the reference line. Of course, they are not perfectly straight, but it's hard to expect better results from a television in this price range; they are really very good. Improving white balance means that colours are more natural and accurately reproduced, which positively impacts the overall visual experience. In terms of gamma, the strange jump at the beginning of the graph has not been eliminated, however, after this error, the entire line is much closer to the expected effect.

For HDR content, the white balance is somewhat worse compared to SDR content, but it is still significantly better than before calibration. It is worth noting that the improvement in white balance in HDR contributes to a more consistent and pleasant perception of colours, even though there may still be shortcomings. Regarding the EOTF graph and the associated contrast, our specialists noted that the lack of control over dynamic tone mapping settings hindered the achievement of significant improvement in this area. This leads to uneven brightness representation.

Despite the shortcomings resulting from the inability to adjust settings for dynamic tone mapping, Sharp FQ8 has gained a new perspective after proper calibrations. The improved white balance and better colour reproduction in SDR mode make the image more natural and pleasing to the eye. Although there are still areas for improvement, especially in HDR content, the television offers satisfying visual experiences, making it a noteworthy choice in its price range.

After calibration, we managed to largely tame the white balance – to the extent that the average viewer will not be able to detect distortions in colours. The characteristic pink-purple haze that previously disrupted the naturalness of the image has also disappeared. The colour palette has been organised, and the colours appear more coherent and neutral. The gamma in SDR content post-calibration looks really good – there is no longer any mention of the previous 'bleeding' effect in bright scenes. The image has become more contrasty and devoid of that milkiness which had previously greatly harmed the viewing experience. In the case of HDR content, the improvement is also noticeable, although here it is still evident that the television is going 'its own way'. The EOTF curve cannot be fully shaped, as Philips simply does not offer the tools to allow precise control over this parameter in its settings. In many films, the television still exposes the image 'in its own way'. Despite these limitations, the calibration has delivered quite a bit of good – most of the colour distortions have been minimised, and the overall balance of the image has significantly improved. However, it must be noted that certain barriers stem from the very design of the hardware and simply cannot be overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.8/10

6.5/10

Review Sharp FQ8 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sharp FQ8 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sharp FQ8 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Sharp FQ8 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions

When it comes to the fluidity of tonal transitions, Sharp FQ8 television performs excellently, presenting very nice transitions in all the tested movie scenes. Colours blend harmoniously, which significantly impacts the picture quality. The only aspect that can be pointed out is a slightly noticeable gradation towards black and in the scene with a colourful sunset against the mountains. However, these minor imperfections do not detract from the overall positive visual experience that the television offers.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Philips MLED920 is not its strongest point. In our tests, we quickly noticed that the television has noticeable issues in darker scenes – examples include segments from the film The Green Knight or test grey palettes. There, the characteristic banding of colours and too sharp transitions between shades can be quite evident, particularly in productions that maintain a darker aesthetic. Fortunately, the situation is better in brighter scenes – there, the image appears smooth and without significant artefacts.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Sharp FQ8 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Sharp FQ8 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The "10-bit colour reproduction" feature in Sharp FQ8 performs reasonably well, as we can see in the image with bulbs that shows slight connections between grey shades. For the best results, it is recommended to set medium, which does not reveal issues with grain smoothing or blurring of essential image elements. Alternatively, the "low" setting also proves to be safer and delivers positive effects.

As for upscaling, the Sharp FQ8 television plays back video without overscan, allowing for full use of the screen. The branches shown in the image are noticeably jagged, while the edges of the trousers appear without clear jaggedness, positively affecting the overall image quality. Additionally, the television offers an AI Super Resolution feature, which artificially sharpens jagged elements, enhancing their clarity.

The manufacturer has equipped this model with several features that improve signal quality, and although we usually approach such "enhancements" with caution, here they prove to be really helpful. The key option is called "distortion reduction" – it works best at a medium level, as on one hand it effectively smooths out unwanted stair-stepping and colour banding, while on the other it does not excessively cut out details, allowing the image to still look natural.

Things are a bit worse with upscaling. Lower quality materials – such as the test video with the model – appeared soft and lacking in sharpness. Indeed, it can be partially corrected with the sharpness slider in the menu, but the effect remains far from what competitors in a similar price range offer. Philips therefore still needs to work on this element, as compared to the successful improvement of tonal transitions, the upscaling simply falls short.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.2/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Sharp FQ8 is equipped with a 120 Hz panel, with the possibility of achieving 144 Hz on PC, which in theory should translate to smooth motion rendering. The television offers functions for improving the smoothness of films and reducing motion blur, which is important for more dynamic content. However, the lack of Black Frame Insertion (BFI) technology combined with an average response time of the panel does not yield positive results. The effect is slight blurring of moving objects, and this may be more noticeable when watching sports or during intense gaming.

The Philips MLED920 features a 144 Hz panel, which immediately suggests that we shouldn't complain about motion smoothness. And indeed – the motion blur is relatively low for a VA panel, and although slight issues can sometimes be noticed on darker backgrounds, they are not something that would stand out to most people during regular viewing.

Another significant advantage is the presence of a motion smoother called “Motion Style.” It allows you to adjust the sensation of smoothness to your own preferences – if someone prefers a more “theatrical,” almost television-like image, they can increase the sliders, whereas if they prefer to maintain the natural “jumps” of cinematic frames, it’s enough to set lower values. This way, everyone can find their golden mean.

Console compatibility and gaming features

7.1/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Warning Yes, high input lag
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

Sharp FQ8 offers several significant features dedicated to gamers that can enhance the gameplay experience. First and foremost, the television is equipped with HDMI 2.1, which comes with certain advantages. ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode) switches the television to a mode with minimal input lag when a gaming device is detected. VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) reduces screen stutter by adjusting the refresh rate to the number of frames generated by the console or computer, providing smoother experiences, especially in dynamic games. Additionally, the television supports G-Sync technology, which synchronises the image with the graphics card, eliminating stuttering and screen tearing. Despite these advantages, FQ8 also has some limitations. The lack of support for HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) means that the television does not optimise dynamic range for HDR games. The Dolby Vision mode, although theoretically offering better image quality in games supporting this format, suffers from very high input lag.

For gamers, the Philips MLED920 is truly a complete tool. The manufacturer has taken care of everything that is considered standard in televisions designed for consoles and PCs today. It features ALLM, so the console automatically switches the screen to game mode, alongside VRR and a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which guarantees smooth gameplay even in fast-paced titles. All key HDR formats are supported – including HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming for Xbox – which means that regardless of what you are playing and on which console, the television will be able to extract the maximum potential from the image. The Game Bar also proves useful in daily gaming – a relatively simple implementation by Philips, but a functional panel where you can quickly check image parameters, enable VRR or adjust settings without leaving the game. It may not be as comprehensive as the competition, but it performs its task flawlessly. And finally, something that sets Philips apart from the competition – Ambilight. The three-sided LED backlighting can create a huge impression in games, especially in the evening. It's also a way to slightly 'extend' the screen and enhance the feeling of immersion. And as colourful LEDs have recently become almost a mandatory element of a gamer’s room, the MLED920 fits into this trend perfectly.

Input lag

9.1/10

9.6/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
18 ms
1080p120
8 ms
9 ms
2160p60
16 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
128 ms
35 ms
2160p120 DV
20 ms
9 ms

Generally, the input lag in Sharp FQ8 is very good, achieving below 16 ms for each tested resolution, making the television suitable for gaming, providing smooth and quick response. However, when Dolby Vision mode is enabled and the refresh rate is 60 Hz, the input lag increases sharply. This significantly worsens responsiveness, which can be particularly troublesome in dynamic games where precision and speed of reaction are crucial.

The input lag on the Philips MLED920 is really very good – in 120 Hz mode, we measured values below 10 ms, which places this model among the absolute top tier of LCD televisions in terms of responsiveness. Even at 60 Hz, a result of around 18 ms is fully acceptable and will not interfere with any type of gameplay. A notable exception is the Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, where the lag can increase to as much as 35 ms. This is a result that might be slightly jarring for esports players, but we must honestly admit – for most so-called "casual gamers", it will be absolutely imperceptible. Especially since we are talking about values that still allow for comfortable gaming without significant compromises.

Compatibility with PC

3/10

4/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Poor
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
17ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review Sharp FQ8 Compatibility with PC
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Compatibility with PC

The cooperation of the television Sharp FQ8 with the PC unfortunately leaves a lot to be desired, despite the low input lag. The main problems arise from the lack of full support for chroma 4:4:4 at a resolution of 4K and 120 Hz, which results in blurry text and details in computer graphics. Additionally, the applied subpixel arrangement of BGR, instead of standard RGB, makes fonts less readable and can appear fuzzy.

When it comes to working with a PC, the Philips MLED920 evokes quite mixed feelings. On one hand, it looks impressive on paper – we have 144 Hz, G-Sync, and FreeSync support, so in terms of gaming on a PC, the television does not disappoint. Anyone looking for a large screen for computer gaming gets a solid package of features here. However, when we try to use it as a typical monitor for everyday work, its limitations quickly become apparent. The fonts do not present themselves well – there is noticeable strong dithering, coloured letters can be jagged, and in the case of very dark text, there are even strange anomalies, as if the panel is losing thin lines and struggling to reproduce them correctly. In short: Yes for PC gaming. For any work and reading text: a definite no.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
84%
68%

The viewing angles on the Sharp FQ8 are quite poor, which is a result of the use of a VA panel. When watching from a wider angle, the television significantly loses brightness, and colours quickly lose their saturation. As a result, the image becomes washed out, and details less clear, which can be problematic if you plan to watch television with a larger group or from different positions in the room.

The viewing angles in the MLED920 are classic for a VA panel – even a slight deviation from the centre causes the image to start losing colours, contrast diminishes, and the overall picture becomes quite flat and unappealing. There are no miracles here. So, if you're watching films with a larger group and everyone is sitting slightly off to the side, this will be somewhat noticeable. On the other hand, something for something: thanks to this panel, the MLED920 can display a much deeper black than televisions with IPS panels.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

5.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Sharp FQ8 Daytime performance
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Daytime performance
Review Sharp FQ8 Daytime performance
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips MLED920 / MLED910: 421 cd/m2

Sharp FQ8: 440 cd/m2

Sharp FQ8 performs quite well in daytime lighting conditions. The panel reaches a brightness level of 440 nits, which, combined with the satin screen coating, results in satisfactory visibility even in bright light. Importantly, the television does not have issues displaying the colour black during the day, which ensures that darker scenes remain readable and do not lose depth, despite the bright surroundings.

The Philips MLED920 performs quite well in everyday use. The applied satin coating on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and in most moderately sunlit living rooms, it handles unwanted glare adequately. However, it should be noted that this is not a television that dazzles with brightness – the average value in SDR hovers around 450 nits. In very bright rooms, especially with large south-facing windows, the screen does not always manage to cut through the intense daylight. In such situations, it is worth supporting it with at least light curtains, so that viewing comfort is not significantly compromised.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
v1.17
TPN258E_V058.002.179.041
Image processor
mt5889

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Sharp FQ8

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

TV features

6.5/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Sharp FQ8 TV features
Review Sharp FQ8 TV features
Review Sharp FQ8 TV features
Review Sharp FQ8 TV features
Review Sharp FQ8 TV features
Review Sharp FQ8 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features

Sharp FQ8 is equipped with a modern Google TV system that provides access to a wide range of applications, such as Netflix, YouTube, Prime Video and Disney+. Additionally, the television supports voice control in Polish, making navigation and quick access to content easier. The FQ8 also offers the ability to connect multiple devices, such as keyboards, mice, Bluetooth headphones, and other accessories.

Despite these advantages, the television has certain limitations. The lack of television recording features and picture-in-picture (PiP) support may be a downside for those using these options. Additionally, Apple device users may feel the lack of compatibility with AirPlay, making it difficult to easily stream content from an iPhone or iPad to the television.

Smart TV – Titan OS

Philips MLED920 uses the proprietary Titan OS, which is just starting its journey in the television market and unfortunately, this is evident at every turn. On one hand, we have basic functions – such as AirPlay support or the ability to mirror from a smartphone, but on the other hand, its limitations quickly become apparent. Screen mirroring only works with a phone, but not with a laptop. Voice search? Yes, but it is only supported by Amazon Alexa and only in the languages supported by this assistant. The system operates reasonably quickly, but from time to time it can "fail" and gives the impression of being something underdeveloped that is still evolving.

Classic TV Features

Titan OS also does not spoil users with classic television features. Apart from the hybrid remote control with a numeric keypad – which is indeed backlit and cleverly designed in two modes, it unfortunately works on infrared – there is nothing here that could truly distinguish the MLED920 from its competitors. There's a lack of USB recording or PiP functionality, and such features could be useful in this class. Among the unusual additions, however, there is an analogue output in the form of a jack that allows you to connect headphones or older speakers. It’s a small nod to users who still use older equipment.

Ambilight TV

What certainly draws attention away from the shortcomings of Titan OS is the unique, three-sided Ambilight system. Here Philips still plays in its own league and can impress those who have not encountered this addition before. The colourful backlighting that reacts to the content on the screen gives the viewing experience a unique atmosphere and is something that the competition does not offer in a similar form. It is the Ambilight that is supposed to make other issues – both system and functional – take a back seat.

Playing files from USB

9.4/10

8.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Thanks to the Google TV system, Sharp FQ8 offers great flexibility in playing files from USB. Users can install various applications for image and sound playback, such as VLC or MX Player, which enables the television to handle most popular file formats with ease. Whether it's movies, music, or photos, support for multiple formats ensures comfortable and hassle-free use of multimedia from external storage devices.

The built-in player in the Philips MLED920 works quite well and manages most popular audio and video files without major issues – exactly as you can see in our test table. Therefore, there are no concerns about typical movie or music formats. We can only criticise its rather selective support for photo formats and some resolutions.

Apps

9.6/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    91dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound assessment of the Sharp FQ8 is of course subjective, yet there are a few aspects worth highlighting. The television is equipped with a soundbar directed straight towards the user, branded by Harman/Kardon. Although it is not a full-fledged soundbar or home theatre system, the speaker arrangement clearly enhances the audio experience, delivering a clearer and more direct sound, which will certainly be a beneficial solution for everyday television viewing. It is also worth noting that the television was capable of achieving very high volume levels, which will definitely assist those who have some sort of hearing difficulty. The only remark we encountered was related to the sound processing by Dolby, which caused quite noticeable sound distortions and artificial clipping.

The sound on the Philips MLED920 is unlikely to be the element that impresses you the most. It sounds rather flat, lacking depth and clearer bass, which means that films or concerts do not have that additional layer of immersion that a better audio system can provide. However, it must be acknowledged that the volume is at a really respectable level – the television can reach up to 88 decibels. A significant advantage of the MLED920 is not so much the sound quality itself, but the handling of audio formats. Philips has ensured compatibility with practically all the major standards, including Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Dolby TrueHD 7.1. As a result, if someone decides to connect an external soundbar or amplifier, they will encounter no limitations and will be able to enjoy the full cinema sound experience.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

88dBC (Max)

75dBC