Samsung U8000F (VA) vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

U8000F / U8092F

Info

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.9

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    6.3

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    7.0

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    6.5

Advantages

  • Decent black and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Great for working with text - excellent font display

  • Basic functions for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

  • Very good contrast and black levels: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Fairly high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional gaming modes: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide selection of apps

  • Supports multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles than the IPS matrix version (Obvious obviousness 😉)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Worse appearance than its predecessor

  • The matrix has significant smearing

  • Strongly visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor bugs in the system

  • Great chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. The biggest advantage of this variant is certainly the quality of black levels. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is enormous – the image gains depth, contrast looks significantly better, and evening film sessions no longer feel like watching content through a grey filter. For a budget segment device, this is truly a nice surprise. The reliable Tizen system is also a plus, as it not only runs smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and a voice assistant (via the app). The PC mode and console connection function flawlessly – fonts are clear and readable. Additionally, it includes basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t transform this television into an e-sports machine – are completely sufficient for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel has its limitations. Viewing angles are not its strongest point – when watching from the side, it’s easy to notice a drop in quality. Nonetheless, it's hard to see this as a serious flaw – because something has to give. Better black levels always come at the cost of slightly less flexibility in positioning. When it comes to HDR, we have rather a symbolic approach – brightness is too low to speak of a true "wow" effect, and the colour palette is limited. But let’s face the truth – that’s not the reason one buys such a television. So if you are planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the variant with a VA panel. It’s still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than one might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price bracket, that’s quite a lot.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. Indeed, in many respects, it is a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good blacks and brightness that competes with more expensive models. In fact, it is identical to the slightly pricier C6K model that we have already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features that make it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the overall impression is tarnished by the performance of the panel used. The television struggles with noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) causes the image to often appear unnatural and artificial – as if it were being overly sharpened. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS is not its flaws, but its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or slightly less) as the fully-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete construction without those annoying errors. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition – if its price drops drastically. For the moment, a significantly safer and better option remains paying a (often nominal) premium for the C6K model. One could cynically state that the letter "S" in the name indeed stands for "Slim." Only it does not refer to an exceptionally slim chassis, but to how much this model has been "trimmed" in terms of features compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

It is worth noting that the test concerns variants with a VA panel, which perform considerably better in terms of black levels and contrast than the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (although it is not a top result among VA panels), the tested scenes looked significantly better – without noticeable greyness or the typical washed-out shadows associated with IPS panels. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, we are not dealing with a construction equipped with local dimming, so it is difficult to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we are talking about an exceptionally budget television that performs quite solidly within its category.

Let’s move on to what tigers like the most, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) results from drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black and contrast. In a direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model barely falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we have a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. Interestingly – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones (in the same size) in the C6KS as in the more expensive counterpart we tested! Black levels perform very well. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major flaws that often plague budget constructions without local dimming. Of course, we can’t cheat physics. It’s important to consider that in very demanding scenes (e.g. bright text on a black background), we may occasionally notice undesirable effects, such as blooming (the halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – generally, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

3.1/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

HDR luminance

Samsung U8000F (VA)

HDR luminance

While the U8000F with a VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there is no longer any reason to be enthusiastic about brightness – especially in HDR scenes. The television achieves a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too low to speak of any impressive light effects. Bright elements appear pale, and scenes that should sparkle look rather flat. We observed an interesting situation during the test of a scene from the film Sicario 2 – the screen became noticeably darker, as if the television was trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to enhance contrast, but in practice, the effect makes very little difference, other than the fact that we see less on the screen. Furthermore, there is the issue of colours – the U8000F does not support a wide colour gamut, so one cannot count on the vibrant, saturated hues known from better models. The HDR image here resembles slightly brightened SDR and... perhaps that is even a good thing. With this model, it is not worth expecting a cinematic experience – it is better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

And what about HDR? Here, the C6KS performs quite well and – as has become a recurring theme of this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must keep in mind the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible blacks. This is quite a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, "true black" more than additional micro-details, the display of which could cause the screen to appear greyed out. This is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It is also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the slogan of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colours are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide colour gamut reaches as much as 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

5/10

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode it offers out of the box – the Filmmaker Mode. This profile is theoretically meant to provide a neutral, cinematic image devoid of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – primarily in HD or SD resolution – the television performed surprisingly decently right out of the box. The only noticeable flaw was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, this did not significantly affect the viewing experience. Considering the television's segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation is much weaker in HDR mode. While the white balance was still acceptable, the colour inaccuracies were very apparent. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself appeared unnatural – the colours were shifted, sometimes too cool, other times simply dull and lifeless. The main problem lies in the hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide colour gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically incapable of reproducing the colours that the HDR standard anticipates. Unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option in the menu labelled as Filmmaker Mode. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of colour reproduction, the lack of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers an almost identical picture characteristic to the aforementioned Filmmaker in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. Therefore, if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colours – the answer is no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7.5/10

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered quite a decent image in SDR for its price class. However, we managed to enhance it slightly – we reduced a subtle purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the television still tends to overly brighten the brightest details – the gamma chart shows a clear inflection that cannot be completely corrected.

In HDR mode, however, it is noticeably weaker. It is hard to speak of any significant improvement here – despite attempts to adjust the settings, the image still presents considerable colour inaccuracies. A Delta E exceeding 7 signifies noticeable deviations that could not be effectively reduced. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the construction itself – the U8000F simply was not designed for serious HDR. In everyday viewing in SDR, it performs quite well, but when it comes to HDR content... it's best not to have overly high expectations.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the C69KS's tendency to distort colours has been effectively limited, resulting in a very good final effect. After calibration, we will no longer see excessive warming of scenes in SDR or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it is worth noting the brightness characteristics. In SDR content, it is hard to have any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programmes, or materials from YouTube. It is significantly more challenging to evaluate the television's performance in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behaviour, but its practical variant reveals certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times, it can dim the entire scene. Thus, calibration brought clear benefits in terms of colour quality, but certain limitations resulting from the local dimming operation and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be overlooked, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

4.8/10

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions

One of the significant elements affecting the perception of the image is the way in which the television handles tonal transitions – that is, the blending of colours and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, it performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe visible banding or disturbances in the colour gradients. The image retains a natural character, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately is often the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright areas, but they are practically unnoticeable and do not affect everyday use of the television.

Looking solely at the fluidity of tonal transitions, the C69KS offers no real cause for complaint. The colour gradation is executed correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. So you may be surprised by the low rating in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final rating is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same position in the lineup. This year's model has been equipped with a feature to improve the fluidity of tone transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Indeed, the television still utilizes quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but nonetheless – it can confidently be said that it works effectively. However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slightly cutting the image when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must reckon with the fact that the image may appear slightly "cut off".

The C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a considerable amount of detail is retained, and the algorithm adds a slight "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. The performance in smoothing tonal transitions is less impressive. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a rather raw state. With older material, this can be quite tiring, as the lack of additional processing highlights any imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so it's clear right from the start that one shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply the standard in this class – adequate for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks. The television offers a single motion smoothing slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction," which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in films. Higher settings produce a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help retain the film's original character with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is "Clear Motion LED," which is the BFI mode – inserting black frames between image frames to improve motion clarity. In practice, however, the screen flickers heavily when this feature is activated and should rather be considered an experiment than something that genuinely enhances gaming comfort.

C69KS offers a simplified motion enhancement panel in films, allowing the adjustment of effect intensity with a slider. This makes it easy to match fluidity to personal preferences. The ability to use higher refresh rates is also a plus – although the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p enables 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, however, in practice, the image at these settings exhibits significant motion blur. The effect is so pronounced that the overall presentation appears merely average and loses its appeal for everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which may still be sufficient for less demanding users. It includes an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the television automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response times. There is also a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce the "tearing" effect – as long as we stay within this range.

Unfortunately, that’s about it for the advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher-end Samsung models from the 2025 line. In theory, the television also supports the HGiG feature, which should adjust HDR imagery to the creators' intentions. Unfortunately – despite the fact that this feature appears in brochures and promotional materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

If we overlook the smudging and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything one can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a well-functioning HGiG. The television can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on a console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings while gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a really successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
9 ms
1080p120
2160p60
11 ms
9 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
9 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
9 ms
2160p120 DV

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. One can confidently say that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to large delays between what we do on the pad and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, making reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
11ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Compatibility with PC
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Compatibility with PC

Working on a computer using this television is a true pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and despite being a VA panel, the text readability is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, it should be noted that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange as VRR operated without problems when it came to consoles.

Aside from the aforementioned possibility of working at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor — the darkest ones have a distinct, rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that working on the computer for an extended period can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

3.7/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
80%

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA matrices. It is a compromise that we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good straight on, but any significant deviation causes rapid drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

3.8/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Good
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Very Good
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin finish of the Samsung U8092F matrix, it handles glare quite well. The screen does not act like a mirror, and the colours – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain relatively saturated, even in slightly brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating itself won't work wonders. The television is simply too dark to effectively penetrate very difficult lighting conditions. If we place it facing a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must consider that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

The C6KS performs really well as a television viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits allows it to easily cut through more challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, the satin finish effectively suppresses reflections. As a result, the television proves to be surprisingly solid during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
1064
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

TV features

5.3/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home integration, and various add-ons, including exclusive Samsung applications. Features such as AirPlay and Chromecast are also available, allowing us to easily connect our phone to the television and share multimedia.

Unfortunately, since this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not choose to include a solar remote control. In the box, we find a classic infrared remote control that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for typical "television" add-ons – there is no recording feature or PiP (picture-in-picture) mode. On the positive side, the HDMI eARC works well, allowing easy control of devices like a decoder or soundbar with the bundled remote – and it indeed works seamlessly.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It's an environment that offers a lot — ideal for those who prioritise a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and the voice assistant work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply comfortable.

The support for traditional television looks somewhat weaker. Users who are counting on advanced "television" features may feel overlooked. Aside from the efficiently functioning Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles the playback of files quite seamlessly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but this is simply not found in any Samsung model.

Certain reservations can be made regarding the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, while other extensions such as SRT or SUB unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it is worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future through a television operating system update.

The system player really performs well and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hitch occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g. HEIC) – here TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, e.g. VLC. This way, you can quickly fill in the gaps of the factory player and run virtually any material, customising the TV to your liking.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

5.7/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

U8092F does not pretend to have home cinema on board. We receive a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds decent, but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, this audio setup is entirely sufficient. We were positively surprised that it managed to play a film with the built-in Dolby Atmos (JOC) codec – although of course, we are not talking about true surround sound here.

The TCL C6KS performs practically identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same speaker set branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth keeping the proper perspective. This bass is quite decent compared to other televisions, but a home cinema system or even a basic soundbar will still offer a significantly fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS will be suitable for regular television viewing, but if someone is looking for a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be the natural choice.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data