Samsung U8000F (VA) vs Samsung S85H

Direct comparison

U8000F / U8092F

Info

S85H

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”65”77”83”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

7.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    8.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.9

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    9.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    5.1

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    7.3

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    7.2

Advantages

  • Decent black and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Great for working with text - excellent font display

  • Basic functions for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast: OLED

  • Decent HDR brightness of up to around 800 nits

  • High image fidelity after calibration

  • Very smooth motion, 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of gaming features: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth

  • Extensive, smooth-running Tizen system

  • Feature-rich solar-powered remote

  • Support for Dolby Atmos immersive sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles than the IPS matrix version (Obvious obviousness 😉)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Worse appearance than its predecessor

  • Worse reflection suppression than its predecessor, a characteristic of the new OLED SE panel

  • Average SDR brightness; best suited to rooms with controlled lighting

  • No DTS:X support, a drawback mainly for owners of Blu-ray collections

  • No Dolby Vision; not essential, but would be welcome 🙂

Our verdict

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. The biggest advantage of this variant is certainly the quality of black levels. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is enormous – the image gains depth, contrast looks significantly better, and evening film sessions no longer feel like watching content through a grey filter. For a budget segment device, this is truly a nice surprise. The reliable Tizen system is also a plus, as it not only runs smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and a voice assistant (via the app). The PC mode and console connection function flawlessly – fonts are clear and readable. Additionally, it includes basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t transform this television into an e-sports machine – are completely sufficient for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel has its limitations. Viewing angles are not its strongest point – when watching from the side, it’s easy to notice a drop in quality. Nonetheless, it's hard to see this as a serious flaw – because something has to give. Better black levels always come at the cost of slightly less flexibility in positioning. When it comes to HDR, we have rather a symbolic approach – brightness is too low to speak of a true "wow" effect, and the colour palette is limited. But let’s face the truth – that’s not the reason one buys such a television. So if you are planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the variant with a VA panel. It’s still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than one might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price bracket, that’s quite a lot.

Samsung S85H is a very successful continuation of the S85 series and a television that still fulfils its primary role well – to be an affordable entry into the world of OLEDs. The biggest change compared with the predecessor is the use of the new OLED SE panel from LG Display, but the overall character of the model has remained practically unchanged. Its greatest strengths remain perfect blacks, very high contrast and a picture that can look particularly superb in the evening. Add to that good colour reproduction and the ability to achieve very high fidelity to the director’s vision. The S85H also performs very well as a versatile all-round TV. Gamers get four HDMI 2.1 ports, 120 Hz, VRR, very low input lag and Game Motion Plus, so there is little to criticise here. Tizen runs quickly and smoothly, and the whole system clearly targets users who mainly use Netflix, YouTube and other streaming services today, while treating traditional broadcast TV as an add-on. The new OLED SE panel is not without drawbacks. This is most noticeable when watching during the day, as it is worse at suppressing reflections than earlier organic panels. Its brightness is also not high enough for the S85H to feel particularly at home in a very brightly sunlit living room. It is still a TV that shows its strengths best in the evening or in a room with at least partial control of ambient light. And that is probably the best way to approach the S85H. It is not an OLED designed to break brightness records or compete with the most expensive panels. Its aim is simply to offer what people like most about the technology, but at a lower price. Perfect blacks, a very good picture for films, excellent gaming capabilities and a user-friendly smart system make the S85H one of the easiest ways to get into OLED without spending a fortune.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

It is worth noting that the test concerns variants with a VA panel, which perform considerably better in terms of black levels and contrast than the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (although it is not a top result among VA panels), the tested scenes looked significantly better – without noticeable greyness or the typical washed-out shadows associated with IPS panels. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, we are not dealing with a construction equipped with local dimming, so it is difficult to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we are talking about an exceptionally budget television that performs quite solidly within its category.

Changing the panel to the new WOLED SE from LG Display practically changed nothing in terms of black levels and contrast. And it was hard to expect any major improvement here, since we're still talking about OLED, a technology that can switch off each pixel individually. In practice, that means perfect blacks and tremendous image depth, particularly in darker scenes. Black bars are truly black, there is no halo around bright elements, and contrast remains virtually infinite. Even very expensive Mini-LEDs with thousands of local dimming zones still cannot offer the same precision as the S85H. And that's its biggest advantage. The S85H may be Samsung's cheapest OLED, but when it comes to blacks it delivers exactly the same as far more expensive models that use organic panels.

HDR effect quality

3.1/10

6.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

733 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

744 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

755 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85H

Samsung U8000F (VA)

Luminance of RGB colors

While the U8000F with a VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there is no longer any reason to be enthusiastic about brightness – especially in HDR scenes. The television achieves a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too low to speak of any impressive light effects. Bright elements appear pale, and scenes that should sparkle look rather flat. We observed an interesting situation during the test of a scene from the film Sicario 2 – the screen became noticeably darker, as if the television was trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to enhance contrast, but in practice, the effect makes very little difference, other than the fact that we see less on the screen. Furthermore, there is the issue of colours – the U8000F does not support a wide colour gamut, so one cannot count on the vibrant, saturated hues known from better models. The HDR image here resembles slightly brightened SDR and... perhaps that is even a good thing. With this model, it is not worth expecting a cinematic experience – it is better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

Interestingly, the new WOLED SE panel has brought a slight improvement in brightness to the S85 series. In the same movie scenes last year's model stayed closer to around 700 nits, while the S85H can reach roughly 800 nits. This isn't a change that completely transforms HDR perception, but that extra brightness is noticeable, especially with pinpoint highlights, specular reflections and stronger special effects. Around 800 nits is already a very good result for an entry-level OLED and in most films it's enough for HDR to have the proper impact. Bright elements can stand out clearly against perfect black, and it's still that contrast that does most of the work. You do need to bear in mind a typical limitation of organic panel technology. When a very bright scene covers a large part of the screen, brightness can drop by almost half. That's the effect of the panel's protection mechanisms, which limit its power with large bright areas.

Colours

The S85H can deliver very pleasing, saturated colours and in most HDR films it looks really good in that respect. We measured around 95% DCI-P3 coverage, so the palette most commonly used in movies is reproduced to a very high degree. Skin tones, greens and stronger reds still have the right intensity, and in normal viewing it's hard to fault them. Only when you look wider at BT.2020 do the limitations of the new OLED SE panel become apparent. Coverage was about 70%, a little less than previous-generation WOLEDs and noticeably less than QD-OLED panels. In films this is not a big loss, because most productions rarely use such highly saturated colours. You're more likely to notice it in games, where creators often opt for more intense colours.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

7/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode it offers out of the box – the Filmmaker Mode. This profile is theoretically meant to provide a neutral, cinematic image devoid of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – primarily in HD or SD resolution – the television performed surprisingly decently right out of the box. The only noticeable flaw was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, this did not significantly affect the viewing experience. Considering the television's segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation is much weaker in HDR mode. While the white balance was still acceptable, the colour inaccuracies were very apparent. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself appeared unnatural – the colours were shifted, sometimes too cool, other times simply dull and lifeless. The main problem lies in the hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide colour gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically incapable of reproducing the colours that the HDR standard anticipates. Unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

For colour evaluation we naturally chose Filmmaker mode, and in SDR our S85H sample was very well set up from the factory. The largest deviation is in the white balance, where, as brightness rises, there is a slight lack of blue. In practice this means whites and greys have a subtly warmer tint than they should. However, this is not a major fault and during normal viewing it is unlikely to be very noticeable. Gamma also stays close to the reference value, so the image is neither overly bright nor unnecessarily dim. The S85H’s SDR picture quality is therefore very good straight out of the box. A few more imperfections appear in HDR. Here the white balance drifts more with increasing brightness, blue starts to dominate and the red component is clearly lacking. This also translates into larger errors for some colours. They do not yet amount to shifts that completely change the character of the image, but in direct comparison with a reference the difference is easier to spot. Overall, Filmmaker mode is a very good starting point before professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered quite a decent image in SDR for its price class. However, we managed to enhance it slightly – we reduced a subtle purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the television still tends to overly brighten the brightest details – the gamma chart shows a clear inflection that cannot be completely corrected.

In HDR mode, however, it is noticeably weaker. It is hard to speak of any significant improvement here – despite attempts to adjust the settings, the image still presents considerable colour inaccuracies. A Delta E exceeding 7 signifies noticeable deviations that could not be effectively reduced. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the construction itself – the U8000F simply was not designed for serious HDR. In everyday viewing in SDR, it performs quite well, but when it comes to HDR content... it's best not to have overly high expectations.

Calibration yields very good results on the S85H. First and foremost, it was possible to set the white balance almost perfectly, which removes the slightly too warm character of the image that was previously visible in SDR. Colour reproduction itself also improves markedly, with most errors falling to a very low level and in everyday viewing it is hard to speak of any noticeable inaccuracies. You can also make significant improvements in HDR, although some issues remain due to the TV's inherent characteristics. The S85H does not always hold the brightness curve perfectly; the darkest parts are slightly lifted, and as you approach the panel's limits small deviations are visible in the brightest areas. Added to this is the limited coverage of the wider BT.2020 gamut, which of course cannot be overcome by any calibration. Despite this, the end result is very good and, after calibration, the S85H can produce a really well-tuned, natural image.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

One of the significant elements affecting the perception of the image is the way in which the television handles tonal transitions – that is, the blending of colours and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, it performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe visible banding or disturbances in the colour gradients. The image retains a natural character, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately is often the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright areas, but they are practically unnoticeable and do not affect everyday use of the television.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is definitely not a strong suit of the S85H compared with other OLEDs. It is most visible in bright gradients, where fairly obvious banding appears between successive shades. Instead of a perfectly smooth transition you can see distinct colour bands and, unfortunately, you do not have to hunt for them. Moving gradients fare even worse. When tonal transitions move the imperfections become more apparent and the picture looks simply average in this respect. It is not perfect on dark gradients either. You can also notice irregularities there, so the issue is not limited to the brightest areas of the image. Of course, in a typical film you will not see this all the time, but scenes with large areas of similar colour, such as sky, fog, sunset or a dark background, can reveal the panel's limitations. Compared with older WOLEDs there is still some improvement, but looking at the TVs we have tested this year the S85H is average in this regard, much like its rival the LG B6 that uses the same panel. And this is one of those traits where the difference compared with last year's QD-OLED panel becomes very clear. QD-OLEDs handle the smooth blending of successive shades much better and, in terms of gradation, clearly outperform the WOLED SE panel used here.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same position in the lineup. This year's model has been equipped with a feature to improve the fluidity of tone transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Indeed, the television still utilizes quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but nonetheless – it can confidently be said that it works effectively. However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slightly cutting the image when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must reckon with the fact that the image may appear slightly "cut off".

Samsung has fitted the S85H with the same proprietary AI NQ4 Gen2 processor used in last year’s S85F and, in terms of digital image processing, it performs quite well. Upscaling is one of the model’s stronger points. Lower-resolution material is well sharpened, edges look natural, and the picture does not feel overly artificial. One caveat is a typical Samsung trait: at very low resolutions you cannot completely disable overscan, so the TV may slightly crop the left edge of the image. The "noise reduction" function also works very well, smoothing weaker tonal transitions. The processor can effectively remove posterisation and other imperfections visible in lower-quality material. However, you need to be careful with the strength of this function, because Samsung can be quite aggressive here. When it is activated, small image details, such as the texture of skin or clothing, can start to disappear along with the unwanted artefacts.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

Blur (4K@60Hz):

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so it's clear right from the start that one shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply the standard in this class – adequate for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks. The television offers a single motion smoothing slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction," which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in films. Higher settings produce a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help retain the film's original character with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is "Clear Motion LED," which is the BFI mode – inserting black frames between image frames to improve motion clarity. In practice, however, the screen flickers heavily when this feature is activated and should rather be considered an experiment than something that genuinely enhances gaming comfort.

The S85H uses an OLED panel, so it performs excellently for motion blur. Pixels respond virtually instantly, so moving objects do not leave the characteristic trailing seen on some LCD TVs. This is especially noticeable in sport and fast-paced games, where the picture remains very clean even during rapid motion. The panel itself runs at 120 Hz. That is more than sufficient for films, TV series, sport and console gaming. It is a pity Samsung did not include a higher refresh rate aimed at PC gamers, as more and more TVs now offer 144 or even 165 Hz at 4K. However, that does not affect motion handling in films or sport.

You also have a classic motion-smoothing feature with two settings, blur reduction and judder reduction. So you can decide whether films should retain their cinematic 24 frames per second or whether you prefer to smooth them a little. The S85H gives plenty of freedom here, and the interpolation works well and, with sensible settings, does not generate too many artefacts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5.3/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which may still be sufficient for less demanding users. It includes an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the television automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response times. There is also a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce the "tearing" effect – as long as we stay within this range.

Unfortunately, that’s about it for the advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher-end Samsung models from the 2025 line. In theory, the television also supports the HGiG feature, which should adjust HDR imagery to the creators' intentions. Unfortunately – despite the fact that this feature appears in brochures and promotional materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

The Samsung S85H is very well prepared for gaming, essentially regardless of whether you connect a console or a PC. The manufacturer hasn't skimped on ports and all four HDMI ports support full HDMI 2.1. That means you can use 4K at 120 Hz, VRR and ALLM without worrying which input your console is plugged into. With multiple devices that matters a lot, because you don't have to choose between a console, a PC or a soundbar connected via eARC. The feature set itself is very comprehensive. The S85H supports VRR, FreeSync and automatic game mode switching, and Samsung also offers its extensive Game Bar where you can quickly check key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. The only notable omission is Dolby Vision, which will matter mainly to Xbox owners. This, incidentally, is typical of Samsung TVs. Game Motion Plus performs very well, and it's one of the features that have set Samsung TVs apart for years. It smooths motion in games running at 30 or 60 fps, but does so without as much increase in input lag as a conventional motion interpolator. In practice, with slower-paced games, racing titles or action games this can really improve the perceived motion, especially if you're sensitive to low frame rates.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
10 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
11 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. One can confidently say that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to large delays between what we do on the pad and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

The Samsung S85H also performs very well in terms of input lag. At 120 Hz we measured input lag below 5 ms, a level at which the TV's response to controls is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the delay is, of course, higher, but still very low, around 10 ms, so in this respect the S85H gives little cause for complaint.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
11ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Working on a computer using this television is a true pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and despite being a VA panel, the text readability is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, it should be noted that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange as VRR operated without problems when it came to consoles.

Samsung S85H will also work very well as a large computer monitor. Font legibility is good and, from the typical viewing distance for such a large screen, text looks really good. You just need to remember the four-subpixel layout of the WOLED panel, because from very close up the edges of letters are not quite as perfectly sharp as on a conventional RGB monitor. However, this is a characteristic of OLED technology itself and, in normal TV use, it should not be an issue.

The S85H also has plenty to offer PC gamers. You get 120 Hz, G-Sync support, very low input lag and, of course, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time. The only thing missing for complete satisfaction is the ability to run the panel at a higher refresh rate. More and more TVs already support 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, so an extra mode like that would be welcome here.

Viewing angles

3.7/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
34%

Viewing angles are one of the major advantages of the S85H and OLED panels in general. Even when viewed well off to the side, the image still retains good contrast, brightness and colour saturation. In this respect the S85H performs decidedly better than practically any LCD or Mini-LED TV available today. Only QD-OLED panels actually do better, as they can keep colours even more consistent at wide viewing angles. However, those are found only in higher-end models.

Daytime performance

3.8/10

5.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Average
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S85H: 350 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin finish of the Samsung U8092F matrix, it handles glare quite well. The screen does not act like a mirror, and the colours – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain relatively saturated, even in slightly brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating itself won't work wonders. The television is simply too dark to effectively penetrate very difficult lighting conditions. If we place it facing a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must consider that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

The Samsung S85H is a moderately bright TV. In our measurements the average SDR brightness was around 350 nits, so that should be sufficient for ordinary daytime viewing, provided the TV is not in a very sunlit living room. In a moderately lit room the picture remains readable, but with large windows and light shining directly on the screen the S85H's capabilities start to fall short. We have a few more criticisms of the WOLED SE panel itself. A change in the panel's construction compared with the previous generation has affected how the screen handles reflections, and unfortunately it is not a change for the better. Reflections are more noticeable than on earlier WOLED panels. LG Display tried to partly mask this effect with a more satin screen finish that scatters light, but that does not completely solve the issue. With a strong light source the reflection becomes quite large and a characteristic greyish halo appears around it. Photos clearly show that such a reflection can occupy a large part of the image and greatly affect how it is perceived. So the S85H does not really change the situation compared with cheaper OLEDs when it comes to daytime viewing. It is best suited to evening use or to a room where you have at least partial control over the lighting. It is still comfortable to use during the day, but it is definitely not a television designed for a very bright living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
1064
1204
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85H TV Panel details

TV features

5.3/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home integration, and various add-ons, including exclusive Samsung applications. Features such as AirPlay and Chromecast are also available, allowing us to easily connect our phone to the television and share multimedia.

Unfortunately, since this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not choose to include a solar remote control. In the box, we find a classic infrared remote control that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for typical "television" add-ons – there is no recording feature or PiP (picture-in-picture) mode. On the positive side, the HDMI eARC works well, allowing easy control of devices like a decoder or soundbar with the bundled remote – and it indeed works seamlessly.

Tizen

Samsung S85H runs on Tizen and, in terms of online features, there is little to criticise. The system is fast and responsive, and the selection of apps is one of the largest on the market. Besides the main streaming platforms you will also find many less popular services, so it’s unlikely you’ll be left without something you really need. Samsung is also developing SmartThings features, integration with other devices and an increasing number of AI-based solutions. There are really lots of possibilities here and some users will probably never explore half of them. A big plus is the promised seven years of system updates. For a television, which we usually keep much longer than a phone or computer, that matters. Tizen should therefore receive new features and fixes for a long time rather than being abandoned after two or three years. The S85H does not, in fact, feel like a cheaper model. We essentially get the same extensive ecosystem that Samsung offers in its more expensive TVs.

Classic features

Samsung’s approach to classic television features looks completely different. It’s clear that for several years the manufacturer has been placing increasing emphasis on "modern" services at the expense of traditional ones. The S85H is therefore not a TV that will particularly appeal to people who are used to extensive control over conventional broadcasting. The supplied remote illustrates this well. It is small, minimalist and has only the most necessary buttons, but lacks a traditional numeric keypad. That works well for streaming, but for those who frequently watch broadcast TV without a set-top box it may not be to everyone’s taste. It’s simply a consequence of the direction Samsung is taking its televisions...

Apps

8.7/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles the playback of files quite seamlessly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but this is simply not found in any Samsung model.

Certain reservations can be made regarding the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, while other extensions such as SRT or SUB unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it is worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future through a television operating system update.

The Samsung S85H's USB file player works quickly and without major problems. The TV handles both videos and photos well, and with the latter we had no issues with unusual resolutions or high megapixel counts. Subtitle support is also a plus, with Polish characters displaying correctly and no additional settings required. The only real shortcoming was lack of support for the HEIC format, which is often used by Apple devices. Apart from that, the built-in player performs very well and will be more than sufficient for most people for everyday use with a USB stick or external USB drive.

Sound

5.7/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    86dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

U8092F does not pretend to have home cinema on board. We receive a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds decent, but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, this audio setup is entirely sufficient. We were positively surprised that it managed to play a film with the built-in Dolby Atmos (JOC) codec – although of course, we are not talking about true surround sound here.

In terms of sound, the S85H hasn't really changed from its predecessor. It still has a fairly basic 2.0 setup with a total power of 20 W, which sounds decent and, for such a slim TV, can even add a touch of bass. It's perfectly adequate for everyday TV viewing, but it's not at the level of pricier models, which can sound fuller and more 'spatial'. With that kind of picture, it really calls for at least adding a soundbar. All the more so as the S85H supports Dolby Atmos and Samsung's proprietary Q-Symphony, which allows a compatible Samsung soundbar to work with the TV's speakers rather than completely replace them. If you want to get more out of this setup for films, an external sound system is the most sensible addition.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

86dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy