Samsung U8000F (IPS) vs Philips OLED820

Direct compare

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3810x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.4

8.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.9

    8.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.8

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.8

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.3

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    3.4

    5.7

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    6.8

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    7.7

Advantages

  • Extensive Smart system: Tizen

  • Good viewing angles (IPS Matrix)

  • Great for working with text - displays fonts excellently

  • Low input lag

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Ideal contrast and black thanks to the WOLED panel

  • High HDR brightness (up to 1300 nits) and wide coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette (99%)

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Great motion smoothness, no motion blur, refresh rate up to 144 Hz

  • Full support for gamers: HDMI 2.1 (2 ports), VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Dolby Vision in games, low input lag

  • Ambilight that has a real impact on the perception of the image and distinguishes the television from the competition

  • GoogleTV system with a vast application base and excellent voice assistant

  • Extras including: Backlit remote control and swivel stand

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X audio formats

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Very poor black and contrast (IPS Matrix)

  • Inferior appearance to its predecessor

  • Infrared remote control

  • Only two HDMI 2.1 ports (with 2 consoles and a soundbar we are forced to "juggle" with the cables)

  • Lack of many classic "TV" functions, e.g. recording to USB or PiP mode, infrared remote may be irritating

  • Slight issues with colour blending (much better than last year but far from the competition)

  • Problems with font readability when working with PC (lack of full support for Chroma 4:4:4)

Our verdict

The U8000F is a very basic television that may find its buyers among those looking for the cheapest Samsung 4K with Smart TV. And that is precisely its task. Thanks to the Tizen system, this model offers quite a lot in terms of smart features – the number of apps and possibilities may catch the attention of those who want a reasonably intelligent device at the lowest possible price. As for picture quality – it is average, which is not surprising in this class. Nevertheless, there are a few positives: fairly good viewing angles work well for traditional TV watching from different parts of the room, and the basic features for gamers (such as VRR and ALLM) may suffice for typical "Sunday" gamers. The PC mode also deserves a mention – the television handles font display very well, so it can also serve as a budget monitor. Of course, this is not a model that can be recommended to everyone "sight unseen." But if someone is looking for a cheap Samsung with 4K resolution and a solid Smart system, that is exactly what the U8000F offers.

Philips OLED820 is a very successful and significant step forward compared to last year's model, the OLED 819. For many people, the main reason for purchase will, of course, be Ambilight: the multi-coloured lighting system that distinguishes Philips televisions from the competition. It's not hard to see why, as it made a huge impression on us as well. It's not just an impressive gadget, but a real addition that can transform the experience of the content being viewed and add depth to it. However, Ambilight should not overshadow what the OLED820 offers as a screen. We have almost infinite contrast, high brightness in HDR films, and excellent colour reproduction, which improves even further after slight tweaking or professional calibration. This set guarantees one of the best images that can currently be found on the market, and on top of that, we are aware that the television offers something unique and unattainable anywhere else. It is also a device that performs well in gaming. The 144 Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 ports open up access to the full potential of next-generation consoles, and the low input lag ensures that gameplay is exceptionally responsive. The operating system – Google TV – also deserves praise. It is a much better solution than the proprietary Titan OS found in lower models of Philips, such as the OLED770. This is a serious argument for paying extra for this model. A larger library of applications, a more efficient voice assistant, and fewer system errors translate into a distinctly better daily experience. Of course, the Philips OLED 820 is not free from minor flaws – there are some shortcomings in the software, and certain functions could be better refined. Nevertheless, the overall presentation is very solid. Perhaps the OLED820 is not a revolutionary television, but it is a very successful and well-balanced proposition in Philips's offering. It combines excellent image quality, a full set of functions for gamers, and a unique addition in the form of Ambilight. If you are looking for a solid OLED in the mid-range that, aside from good image quality, offers something distinctive and simultaneously exceptional, the OLED820 should be high on your shopping list.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Black
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

1.1/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

650:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Samsung U8000F, more specifically model U8092F in the 55-inch version, is equipped with an IPS panel. Let's be honest – this is not the best choice when it comes to properly displaying black levels and contrast. The results in this category are simply weak. The contrast is abysmal, and watching dark scenes with any kind of "cinematic" effect is nearly impossible. Additionally, the fact that the television lacks local dimming does not help, making it difficult to achieve better results. The only thing worth praising is the fairly decent uniformity of the panel – but that's more of a minor consolation. Overall, it's not good. If you value deep blacks and reasonable contrast, it is definitely better to opt for the variant with a VA panel, which performs significantly better in this particular series.

Contrast and black are the domain of OLEDs, and the Philips OLED820 is no exception. The applied WOLED panel from LG Display functions just like in the LG C5 models or the Samsung S90F, providing exactly what we expect – perfect black and infinite contrast. Whether we are watching challenging scenes full of intricate details or simpler shots immersed in uniform black, the television always performs flawlessly. It separates light from darkness with surgical precision, creating an extraordinary sense of depth in the image. And while one can debate various technologies, in this category, OLED simply reigns supreme, and the Philips OLED820 only confirms this rule.

HDR effect quality

3/10

7.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 81.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 76.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

191 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

224 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

79 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

234 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1035 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1235 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1356 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1315 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

521 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED820

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Better does not mean good – and that is exactly how to summarise the capabilities of U8092F when it comes to displaying bright movie scenes in HDR mode. The brightness of the panel is just under 250 nits, which is definitely too little to enjoy any light effects. An interesting situation was observed during the measurement of the fourth scene from the film Sicario 2 – the television clearly dimmed the entire screen in an attempt to achieve better black levels (which remain weak anyway). One might even suggest that the device is using some form of 'global dimming', but unfortunately – the results are still very poor. To make matters worse, the television does not support a wide colour gamut – the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 80%, so one cannot expect truly vibrant colours. The HDR image here looks more like a slightly brightened SDR, and it is this form that we would suggest sticking to when it comes to this television.

When it comes to HDR quality, the Philips OLED820 uses the same class of WOLED panel found in its biggest rivals – the LG C5 and Samsung S90F. This means we can expect really solid results. This year, mid-range OLED panels can exceed the threshold of a thousand nits, and the tested model reaches around 1300 nits in some films. This is an outstanding result, allowing the director's vision to be conveyed with immense precision, as this is the brightness range in which contemporary productions are mastered. Of course, there are situations where even the OLED820 has to compromise. Full-screen scenes filled with white, like those in the film The Meg, can drop brightness to 400–500 nits, which clearly weakens the effect. This is a characteristic of OLED technology that has yet to be fully eliminated. Despite this limitation, it is hard not to appreciate the HDR in this model – high luminance and a wide DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage of 99% make the image simply look fantastic.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

6.7/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung U8000F has been tested in the best possible picture mode built into the television, namely Filmmaker Mode. This mode should – at least in theory – offer a cinematic, reference picture without unnecessary enhancements. In the case of SDR content (mainly HD/SD), the television, out of the box, showed itself surprisingly well. Errors in white balance hovered around a value of 3, which is roughly on the edge of perceptibility. The only complaint could be about brightness management – the gamma graph showed a slight tendency to lighten or darken certain sections, but even so, the overall performance is quite good for this price segment.

Unfortunately, it looks much worse in HDR mode. Although the white balance was not terrible, the television had significant colour errors – particularly evident in the Color Checker graph, where almost every sample hit outside the target point. The picture in HDR simply looks unnatural, and the colours can be shifted, dull, or too cool. This largely stems from the fact that the U8000F does not support a wide colour gamut (DCI-P3). The television is physically unable to display correct colours in the HDR standard – and unfortunately, this is felt in every more demanding material.

The colour reproduction in the factory settings really surprised us, and positively so. The Philips OLED820, switched to Filmmaker mode, immediately showed that it was quite well tuned in terms of colour. The white balance was relatively accurate, though there was a slight deficiency in the blue hue, which occasionally gave the image a slightly yellowish tint. However, this is not a flaw that particularly detracts from everyday viewing. A bigger issue arose with the brightness characteristics. The gamma curve clearly deviated from the ideal, with the line below the expected values, causing the image to be excessively brightened, and the colours looked as if they were covered with a light milky filter. This effect was also noticeable in tests using the Colour Checker pattern, where more pronounced errors appeared.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

9.3/10

Although the U8000F already offered a fairly well-balanced image in SDR straight out of the box, we were able to refine it a bit further. We managed to eliminate a slight purple tint and adjust the gamma to a more sensible level. However, the television still has a tendency to overexpose the smallest and brightest parts of the image – the gamma chart shows a characteristic 'dip' that is difficult to completely straighten out.

Unfortunately, the situation is worse in HDR. It's hard to speak of any significant improvement here – the television is simply not designed for HDR content. We tried to correct the image in the advanced settings, but despite our efforts, the colour errors remained substantial – a delta E above 7 indicates very noticeable deviations. It's a bit disappointing, but that's the nature of budget construction. In SDR, the U8000F performs reasonably well, whereas HDR is just not its league.

After calibration, both the Filmmaker mode and the gaming mode gained a lot. A slight adjustment of the white balance and an improvement in brightness characteristics produced excellent results in SDR content – the image looked almost perfect, natural, and very close to reference. In the case of HDR materials, the situation was similar, the colours were presented wonderfully, and it was hard to find anything to criticise. However, we noticed a certain feature, which we already pointed out when comparing scenes from the film Billy Lynn. The analysis of the EOTF curve showed that the television has a slight tendency to dim details in the blacks, so the darkest parts are not always displayed exactly as intended by the director. Nevertheless, the effect after calibration is stunning, and the OLED820 is emerging as one of the more interesting screens in its class. It just needs a little pampering, and there really is nothing to worry about.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

6.5/10

Another important aspect to consider when assessing image quality is the smoothness of tonal transitions – that is, how well the television handles the blending of colours and shades. And here the Samsung U8092F performs... almost perfectly. On the test patterns, there are no noticeable stepping transitions, no issues with colour gradients, and the whole picture is not artificially sharpened, which unfortunately happens with many televisions in this class. The image appears natural and very clear. We noticed minimal issues with the brightest scenes, but that is more nitpicking, which only a very trained eye will catch.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is unfortunately the Achilles' heel of the Philips OLED820. During testing, we noticed slight issues with colour blending – both in bright and darker scenes, one can perceive distinctive banding that detracts from the naturalness of the image. It must be acknowledged that compared to last year's OLED 819 model, there is a significant improvement, but nevertheless, the competition performs better in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – namely the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same spot in the range.

This year's model has been equipped with a feature that enhances the fluidity of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the television still uses fairly strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but despite that – it can be confidently said that it works effectively.

However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must reckon with the fact that the image may appear slightly "choppy".

Fortunately, the earlier effects of the mentioned posterisation can be quite effectively mitigated. The "distortion reduction" function set to a medium level deals with unwanted colour banding, improving the smoothness of tonal transitions. It does happen that it works a bit too aggressively and also smooths out some details – such as minor skin imperfections of the actors – but nevertheless, it can be considered worth using without substantial compromises. The upscaling in the OLED820 also performs quite well. The test image with the model is exceptionally soft, sometimes even too much so, although this can be rectified by slightly boosting the sharpness in the picture menu – this is really a matter of individual preference. The absence of overscan issues with very low-resolution content is also commendable, meaning we don't have to worry that the image will be unnecessarily cropped.

Blur and motion smoothness

6/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
48%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so it's clear from the outset that we shouldn't expect miracles. It's simply the standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing but without any fireworks.

The television offers a single motion smoothing slider – a function called “Motion Blur Reduction”, which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in films. Higher settings provide a more “theatrical” and smoothed effect, while lower settings maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is “LED Clear Motion”, which is a BFI mode – that inserts black frames between frames of the image to improve motion clarity. However, in practice, the screen flickers quite a bit when this feature is activated, and it should be regarded more as an experiment than something that genuinely enhances the comfort of gaming.

The fluidity of motion is an area where OLEDs always shine, and the Philips OLED820 confirms this rule. The panel itself offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which primarily benefits PC gamers, but even with standard television sources or consoles, where it operates at 120 Hz, the motion is fast, sharp and simultaneously smooth, without signs of blurring. This is thanks to the remarkable response time between pixels, which maintains image clarity in every dynamic scene. The manufacturer has also added its own smoother called "Motion Style". In the menu, we find two sliders – the first, responsible for fluidity, allows adjustments to the number of artificially added frames in films. This way, we can choose a raw, cinematic character with a distinctly visible film frame or a more theatrical image with smooth motion. The second slider is for motion blur reduction, particularly useful in sports broadcasts. Here, we definitely recommend setting it to the maximum value, as the effect is truly excellent.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

The Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which may still prove sufficient for less demanding users. It includes an automatic game mode – upon launching a game on the console, the television automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response times. We also find a VRR feature, meaning variable refresh rate, which operates within a range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce the effect of screen tearing – provided, of course, we stay within this range.

Unfortunately, that is about it when it comes to advantages. Add-ons like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung's 2025 line. In theory, the television also supports the HGiG function, which should adjust HDR images to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – despite this feature appearing in brochures and retail materials – its configuration on the Xbox console has proven to be... impossible in practice.

The Philips OLED820 is one of the most complete televisions for gamers. On board, we find practically everything one could expect: two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps (it's a shame there aren't four), variable refresh rate VRR, automatic game mode ALLM, support for Dolby Vision in games, and a good implementation of the HGiG mode. The television handles lower resolutions at 120 Hz with ease, so one can count on considerable flexibility when choosing different picture modes on the console. Philips also includes a Game Bar – a panel that allows changing picture modes, adding a crosshair, or previewing parameters. Although it looks rather clunky and is less polished than that of the competition, it does its job. In practice, therefore, the OLED820, in addition to a full set of four HDMI 2.1 ports, offers nearly everything a gamer could need.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
13 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of resolution or mode – the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. One can confidently say that playing on this television will not cause frustration due to large delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

The input lag on the Philips OLED820 is truly at a reference level. Measurements showed values below 5 ms, placing it among the absolute top televisions available on the market. Even the Dolby Vision mode does not pose any problems in this regard, which is quite a rare phenomenon. In practice, this means lightning-fast response to every movement, no noticeable delays, and complete comfort in dynamic games. In short, superb results that will delight even the most demanding gamers.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWBG
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

Working on a computer with this television is an absolute pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and thanks to the layout of the sub-pixels in the IPS panel, the readability of fonts – regardless of colour or size – is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, primarily due to its low input lag. However, one must take into account that the G-Sync function does not work on this model, which is odd as VRR functioned without any issues when it came to the console.

Cooperation with a PC in the case of the Philips OLED820 varies depending on the application. For gaming, it performs exceptionally well: a high refresh rate of 144 Hz combined with G-Sync support provides the smoothness and responsiveness that other televisions can envy. The situation is less favourable when it comes to text work. The lack of proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4 causes fonts on coloured backgrounds to appear slightly blurred, which significantly reduces work comfort. Therefore, it's hard to recommend the OLED820 as a screen for office work with text or numbers. It's a shame the manufacturer hasn't learned from last year's models and this flaw continues to be repeated.

Viewing angles

7/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
34%
34%

The viewing angles on the Samsung U8092F are very good – as one would expect from an IPS panel. The image does not lose much in terms of brightness or colour saturation, even with a greater deviation from the axis. Of course, this is not at the level of organic screens – but it is more than sufficient to comfortably watch the image at an angle, for example, from the side of the sofa.

The viewing angles in the Philips OLED820 are another advantage that should please you. OLEDs have always been characterised by almost perfect angles, so regardless of where we look from, the image remains clear and legible. Indeed, the classic WOLED matrix does not compare to technologies like MLA OLED or QD-OLED, but it's still hard to find fault here. The angles are simply excellent.

TV efficiency during daytime

3.4/10

5.7/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED820: 345 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (IPS): 218 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin coating of the Samsung U8092F panel, it handles reflection suppression quite well. The screen does not function like a mirror, and the colours – considering the capabilities of this class of device – remain reasonably saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone cannot perform miracles. The television is simply too dim to effectively cut through very challenging lighting conditions. If we place it opposite a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must reckon with the fact that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
Software version during testing
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1064.4, E2500007, BT-S
TPM231WW_R.201.100.146.207
Image processor
MT5896 3GB

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

5.3/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home support, and various add-ons, including exclusive Samsung applications. There are also features such as AirPlay and Chromecast, which allow us to easily connect our phone to the television and stream multimedia.

Unfortunately, as this is the cheapest series from Samsung in 2025, the manufacturer has not decided to include a solar remote. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote, which visually resembles the newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for the typical "television" add-ons – the recording function and PiP (picture-in-picture) mode are missing. However, HDMI eARC works in its favour, allowing easy control of devices such as a decoder or soundbar with the remote included – and it truly works seamlessly.

GoogleTV on OLED820

Philips OLED820 runs on the Google TV system, which immediately places it among televisions that truly offer user freedom. It’s a fantastic platform that needs no introduction – it boasts almost an endless number of applications, from popular VOD services to niche programmes or games. Google TV also allows you to personalise the home screen, tailoring content to our preferences, so the television actually “learns” our viewing style. A significant advantage is also the voice assistant from Google – fast, natural, and effective. It can understand even less obvious questions, and in practice, it works much better than many competitors. Unfortunately, there was a hiccup – the screen mirroring feature simply did not work during testing. This can be considered a minor issue, but in 2025, such things simply shouldn’t happen.

Classic Features of OLED820

When it comes to classic additions, the OLED820 does not try to play conservative notes. On one hand, we get a backlit remote control with a numerical keypad that is quite well organised and easy to use. On the other hand – you have to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared, which is more reminiscent of equipment from a decade ago than a modern television. It also lacks some features that are often found in competitors – there is no USB recording from tuners or a PIP mode. A nice touch among the classic solutions is the analogue mini-jack headphone input. This is rare today and could prove useful – whether for a senior with an additional headphone station or for someone who would like to connect older speakers.

AmbilightTV OLED820

One cannot overlook Ambilight, which is a hallmark of Philips. This solution impacts not only the appearance of the television but also the reception of content. The illumination system can be set up in various ways, from a multi-coloured mode that dynamically tracks the image to calmer, static backlighting. We definitely recommend the latter option, as the gentle light behind the screen makes the content being watched, combined with the OLED matrix, look even deeper and more engaging. It’s a simple yet very effective addition that has given Philips televisions character for years.

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles file playback quite seamlessly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but that is simply not found in any Samsung model.

Some reservations can be made regarding the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, while other extensions like SRT or SUB unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it's worth knowing. Perhaps it is an issue to be addressed in the future with an update to the television's operating system.

The Philips OLED820 has a built-in file player with USB, which at first glance looks quite clunky, but in practice works surprisingly well. One could even say that it is one of the best built-in players available in televisions. It handles practically every type of file: photos, videos or music, with a few minor exceptions that most of the competition does not support either. And if someone still feels like something is missing, there is always the option of installing the VLC application from the Google Play library, and the problem disappears.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

5.7/10

7.7/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

U8092F does not pretend to have a home cinema on board. We receive a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds adequate, but without much excitement, although it does have a slight bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is entirely sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it managed to play a film with the built-in Dolby Atmos (JOC) codec – though of course, we are not talking about real surround sound.

The Philips OLED 820 features a built-in 4.1 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. At the back of the casing is a subwoofer, which is responsible for quite solid and deep bass. The classic speakers responsible for the rest of the range are located at the bottom of the television, which means that the sound does not always spread in the way we would want. However, the overall sound can be considered acceptable – series, television programmes, or occasional music listening are satisfactory, with a slight bass support. This should be sufficient for daily use, although we still recommend purchasing even an inexpensive soundbar, which will significantly improve the user experience.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC