Samsung U8000F (IPS) vs LG UA75006LA (VA)

Direct comparison

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

6.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.9

    6.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.8

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.2

    5.0

  • Gaming on console

    6.5

    6.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    5.4

  • Watching in bright light

    3.4

    4.6

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    6.0

Advantages

  • Extensive Smart system: Tizen

  • Good viewing angles (IPS Matrix)

  • Great for working with text - displays fonts excellently

  • Low input lag

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • High native contrast (VA Panel), better black levels, less "flattened" image in evening screenings

  • Correct upscaling and decent tonal transition gradation

  • webOS system with a rich app base and support for AirPlay

  • Ability to record to USB from built-in tuners

  • Low input lag (below 10 ms)

  • Friendly for the "casual gamer": ALLM, VRR (48–60 Hz), Game Bar, HGiG

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Very poor black and contrast (IPS Matrix)

  • Inferior appearance to its predecessor

  • Infrared remote control

  • Limited colour gamut coverage (approx. 80% DCI-P3), rather symbolic HDR

  • No dynamic HDR formats (Dolby Vision, HDR10+)

  • Typical off-axis viewing issues for VA panels

  • Quite a plastic housing and no Magic remote included in the package

Our verdict

The U8000F is a very basic television that may find its buyers among those looking for the cheapest Samsung 4K with Smart TV. And that is precisely its task. Thanks to the Tizen system, this model offers quite a lot in terms of smart features – the number of apps and possibilities may catch the attention of those who want a reasonably intelligent device at the lowest possible price. As for picture quality – it is average, which is not surprising in this class. Nevertheless, there are a few positives: fairly good viewing angles work well for traditional TV watching from different parts of the room, and the basic features for gamers (such as VRR and ALLM) may suffice for typical "Sunday" gamers. The PC mode also deserves a mention – the television handles font display very well, so it can also serve as a budget monitor. Of course, this is not a model that can be recommended to everyone "sight unseen." But if someone is looking for a cheap Samsung with 4K resolution and a solid Smart system, that is exactly what the U8000F offers.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel is a television designed for everyday viewing of television, YouTube, or streaming platforms, where SDR content still dominates. It performs very well in this role – it has decent digital image processing, respectable upscaling, and quite coherent tonal transitions. The biggest advantage remains the webOS system, full of applications and features, such as USB recording, AirPlay support, and screen mirroring. For many people, this is enough to consider it a “television for daily use.” It will also perform reasonably well as a screen for the occasional gamer – although it only has a 60 Hz panel, it features ALLM, VRR in the 48–60 Hz range, and a convenient Game Bar, which are usually reserved for more expensive models. Downsides? Primarily the viewing angles – as is the case with VA, the image quickly loses quality from the side. There are also no dynamic HDR formats, and the limited colour palette means that cinematic “HDR effects” are minimal. On the other hand, it is an affordable television that is likely to see appealing discounts, so if someone doesn’t want to spend a fortune and accepts its limitations, they get a solid “basic model” with a good system. It’s just a shame the manufacturer didn’t include a Magic remote in the package.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

1.1/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

650:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,350:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,800:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Samsung U8000F, more specifically model U8092F in the 55-inch version, is equipped with an IPS panel. Let's be honest – this is not the best choice when it comes to properly displaying black levels and contrast. The results in this category are simply weak. The contrast is abysmal, and watching dark scenes with any kind of "cinematic" effect is nearly impossible. Additionally, the fact that the television lacks local dimming does not help, making it difficult to achieve better results. The only thing worth praising is the fairly decent uniformity of the panel – but that's more of a minor consolation. Overall, it's not good. If you value deep blacks and reasonable contrast, it is definitely better to opt for the variant with a VA panel, which performs significantly better in this particular series.

This is where the greatest advantage of the VA panel version begins. A contrast ratio of around 6000:1 means that during evening viewing, the image gains depth, and darker scenes in films look natural and do not wash out to grey. It is clear that the blacks are much better than in the IPS panel version, and it is this difference that defines the character of the television. Of course, one must remember that the UA7500 lacks local dimming, so one shouldn't expect miracles. The darkest scenes cannot compete with more expensive televisions, but at least the contrast is stable and sufficient for evening screenings to be convincing.

HDR effect quality

3/10

4.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 81.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 79.4%, Bt.2020: 59.2%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

191 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

224 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

79 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

234 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

300 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

263 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

366 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

218 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

351 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG UA75006LA (VA)

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

Better does not mean good – and that is exactly how to summarise the capabilities of U8092F when it comes to displaying bright movie scenes in HDR mode. The brightness of the panel is just under 250 nits, which is definitely too little to enjoy any light effects. An interesting situation was observed during the measurement of the fourth scene from the film Sicario 2 – the television clearly dimmed the entire screen in an attempt to achieve better black levels (which remain weak anyway). One might even suggest that the device is using some form of 'global dimming', but unfortunately – the results are still very poor. To make matters worse, the television does not support a wide colour gamut – the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 80%, so one cannot expect truly vibrant colours. The HDR image here looks more like a slightly brightened SDR, and it is this form that we would suggest sticking to when it comes to this television.

The LG UA7500 with a VA panel holds brightness at around 350 nits, which does not make a significant impression by today's standards. It is hard to speak of a true HDR experience here – most content looks more like classic SDR with a slight attempt at boosting the highlights. The advantage is that regardless of the tested scene, the effect remained relatively stable. However, we noticed that in very extreme scenes with a lot of fine details, the television can gently dim the image to achieve better black levels, but this comes at the expense of visibility of bright effects. It is also worth noting that the UA7500 is not equipped with any additional technologies for expanding colours. It is neither a QLED panel nor PFS LED, which is why the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is only 80%, making many HDR films appear flat and not conveying the full diversity of colours.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

5.6/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung U8000F has been tested in the best possible picture mode built into the television, namely Filmmaker Mode. This mode should – at least in theory – offer a cinematic, reference picture without unnecessary enhancements. In the case of SDR content (mainly HD/SD), the television, out of the box, showed itself surprisingly well. Errors in white balance hovered around a value of 3, which is roughly on the edge of perceptibility. The only complaint could be about brightness management – the gamma graph showed a slight tendency to lighten or darken certain sections, but even so, the overall performance is quite good for this price segment.

Unfortunately, it looks much worse in HDR mode. Although the white balance was not terrible, the television had significant colour errors – particularly evident in the Color Checker graph, where almost every sample hit outside the target point. The picture in HDR simply looks unnatural, and the colours can be shifted, dull, or too cool. This largely stems from the fact that the U8000F does not support a wide colour gamut (DCI-P3). The television is physically unable to display correct colours in the HDR standard – and unfortunately, this is felt in every more demanding material.

The Filmmaker mode on the LG UA7500 performs better than one might expect from such a budget television, but let’s not get carried away with praise. The image is put together quite sensibly and does not irritate at first glance, however, its weaknesses quickly become apparent. This is most evident in scenes with bright points – background lamps or reflections of light on the skin are distinctly exaggerated. The faces of the characters often look unnatural, as if they have been 'overexposed'. Added to this is the default gamma characteristic, which brightens the smallest details and causes the image to lose subtlety in darker areas. Nevertheless, it is a fact that for its price range, the UA7500 in factory mode provides a fairly decent starting point. However, it is clear that without additional adjustment, it will not be possible to avoid these problems, which is why – as with other televisions – we decided to see what could be achieved after calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Although the U8000F already offered a fairly well-balanced image in SDR straight out of the box, we were able to refine it a bit further. We managed to eliminate a slight purple tint and adjust the gamma to a more sensible level. However, the television still has a tendency to overexpose the smallest and brightest parts of the image – the gamma chart shows a characteristic 'dip' that is difficult to completely straighten out.

Unfortunately, the situation is worse in HDR. It's hard to speak of any significant improvement here – the television is simply not designed for HDR content. We tried to correct the image in the advanced settings, but despite our efforts, the colour errors remained substantial – a delta E above 7 indicates very noticeable deviations. It's a bit disappointing, but that's the nature of budget construction. In SDR, the U8000F performs reasonably well, whereas HDR is just not its league.

The biggest improvement we noticed was when calibrating the mode intended for everyday SDR content. We managed to smooth out the white balance in an acceptable way and tackle the problem of excessive brightening of fine details due to the gamma curve. As a result, the image gained the consistency and naturalness that was missing in the factory settings. After such adjustments, we can confidently state that for everyday television content, programmes, or materials from YouTube, the LG UA7500 performs very well – especially after professional calibration. The situation is somewhat different for HDR content. Here, calibration allowed us to tame the white balance and slightly improve the brightness management; however, the limitations of the construction are immediately apparent. The lack of additional filters to widen the colour palette results in the most vivid colours appearing flat, and the image does not display the intensity we would expect from good HDR. So in SDR, the UA7500 performs quite well, but in HDR – despite corrections – it remains far behind, and this is a characteristic that one must accept when choosing this television.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

8.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Another important aspect to consider when assessing image quality is the smoothness of tonal transitions – that is, how well the television handles the blending of colours and shades. And here the Samsung U8092F performs... almost perfectly. On the test patterns, there are no noticeable stepping transitions, no issues with colour gradients, and the whole picture is not artificially sharpened, which unfortunately happens with many televisions in this class. The image appears natural and very clear. We noticed minimal issues with the brightest scenes, but that is more nitpicking, which only a very trained eye will catch.

The colour transitions in most scenes were smooth and hard for the average viewer to notice. However, the VA matrix variant provided something more – in the darker parts of the image, one could see significantly more shades, as the higher contrast allowed them to be brought out better. As a result, the image did not appear flattened and looked more natural. The transitions between colours themselves generally looked quite good and did not distract from the content.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – namely the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same spot in the range.

This year's model has been equipped with a feature that enhances the fluidity of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the television still uses fairly strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but despite that – it can be confidently said that it works effectively.

However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must reckon with the fact that the image may appear slightly "choppy".

LG UA7500 with a VA panel performed really well in this category. Image scaling from Full HD or even SD materials was surprisingly smooth. The picture looked smooth, edges were not overly jagged, and the television retained a considerable amount of detail, meaning that even older films did not lose their character. It particularly excelled with faces – there were no artificial contours or 'mask' effects, which often occur in cheaper models. The way the television handled tonal transitions in lower quality materials is also noteworthy. Thanks to digital processing, colours did not bleed into each other, and gradients appeared natural and smooth. There was no excessive smoothing of the image or loss of cinematic grain. This makes the UA7500 great for everyday content – from terrestrial television, through sports, to YouTube, where we often watch materials in various resolutions.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

4/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
48%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so it's clear from the outset that we shouldn't expect miracles. It's simply the standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing but without any fireworks.

The television offers a single motion smoothing slider – a function called “Motion Blur Reduction”, which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in films. Higher settings provide a more “theatrical” and smoothed effect, while lower settings maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is “LED Clear Motion”, which is a BFI mode – that inserts black frames between frames of the image to improve motion clarity. However, in practice, the screen flickers quite a bit when this feature is activated, and it should be regarded more as an experiment than something that genuinely enhances the comfort of gaming.

The LG UA7500 is a television with a 60 Hz panel, so it's difficult to expect much admiration in this category. It's more of a screen intended for everyday content or an evening film viewing rather than for following dynamic sporting events or playing action games. It's clear that the manufacturer targeted this model specifically at that group of consumers – and it performs correctly in that regard. We have the TruMotion feature available, which is a motion smoother. It's simple, with only one slider, but it can introduce a noticeable difference. At the lower settings, the image appears more raw and cinematic, whereas at higher values, the motion becomes smoother and more pleasing to the eye.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5.3/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which can still prove sufficient for less demanding users. We have an automatic game mode here – upon launching a game on the console, the television automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response time. We also find a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range from 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce a tearing effect on the image – provided, of course, that we stay within this range.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung televisions from the 2025 model year due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the crucial gaming feature HGiG.

And unfortunately, that’s about it in terms of advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the television also supports the HGiG feature, which should adjust HDR image to the creators' intentions. Unfortunately – despite the fact that this feature appears in promotional brochures and retail materials – its configuration on the Xbox console has proven to be... impossible in practice.

The LG UA7500 is a television that can be confidently recommended to "casual" gamers. It lacks a 120 Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 ports, so it cannot fully utilise the potential of modern consoles. However, the manufacturer has included several features that can enhance the gaming experience. Notably, the Game Bar stands out – a very well-designed panel where you can quickly preview and change the most important settings. From this interface, we have access to features like ALLM mode (automatic switching to game mode) and frame synchronization, which is VRR. The VRR range is limited – it works from 48 to 60 Hz – but the mere presence of this feature in such an affordable television makes a positive impression.

Additionally, it supports HGiG, which is the HDR calibration mode for gaming. It sounds good, but based on our testing experiences, we already know that for the UA7500, this option doesn't make much sense. The television doesn't handle HDR very well, so paradoxically, we achieved better results with this mode disabled. This is another indication that the UA7500 is more of a screen for occasional gamers who value simplicity and convenience rather than for those seeking the full experience from the latest consoles.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
10 ms
1080p120
2160p60
12 ms
10 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
10 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of resolution or mode – the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. One can confidently say that playing on this television will not cause frustration due to large delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

A delay of below 10 ms is a result that more expensive models could easily envy. This ensures that games run exceptionally responsively, with every action on the controller immediately visible on the screen. This is one of the strongest points of this television, particularly for those who enjoy firing up a console from time to time.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

5.4/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
12ms
10ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Working on a computer with this television is an absolute pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and thanks to the layout of the sub-pixels in the IPS panel, the readability of fonts – regardless of colour or size – is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, primarily due to its low input lag. However, one must take into account that the G-Sync function does not work on this model, which is odd as VRR functioned without any issues when it came to the console.

The LG UA7500 with a VA panel performs somewhat weaker in this regard. The fonts are not as crystal clear as with IPS, and after prolonged use, the difference in readability can be felt. Support for 4:4:4 chroma is of course available, so colours appear correct, but overall it does not provide such a comfortable effect. In everyday use, the differences may not be significant, but for work with text and graphics, IPS proves to be a much better choice. The VA version is more suited as a versatile television with the option to connect a PC, rather than a fully-fledged office tool.

Viewing angles

7/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
34%
76%

The viewing angles on the Samsung U8092F are very good – as one would expect from an IPS panel. The image does not lose much in terms of brightness or colour saturation, even with a greater deviation from the axis. Of course, this is not at the level of organic screens – but it is more than sufficient to comfortably watch the image at an angle, for example, from the side of the sofa.

The VA panel version presents a completely different approach. Straight on, the screen looks significantly better – the contrast is higher, blacks are deeper, and the colours are more saturated than in IPS. The problem arises when we move away from the axis. Just sitting a little off to the side causes the colours to start losing their intensity, and the image becomes noticeably paler. Black quickly turns to grey, and the whole loses its original character. Therefore, the UA7500 in the VA version works best in a typically "cinematic" setup – with a sofa or armchair positioned directly in front of the screen. In that case, the television can provide a much better experience than IPS, but when watching with a larger group from different places in the room, the limited viewing angles become its biggest disadvantage.

Daytime performance

3.4/10

4.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG UA75006LA (VA): 302 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (IPS): 218 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin coating of the Samsung U8092F panel, it handles reflection suppression quite well. The screen does not function like a mirror, and the colours – considering the capabilities of this class of device – remain reasonably saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone cannot perform miracles. The television is simply too dim to effectively cut through very challenging lighting conditions. If we place it opposite a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must reckon with the fact that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel performed slightly better when it comes to watching in a bright room. The applied coating handles reflection suppression moderately – it does not eliminate them entirely, but it softens them enough to watch television during the day without significant discomfort. A plus is that the television maintains quite decent colour saturation, so the image does not appear washed out even with incoming light. The brightness itself is also a bit higher than in the IPS variant, reaching around 300 nits, making the screen slightly more resistant to challenging lighting conditions. Of course, this is not a level that will ensure comfort in very sunlit living rooms, but it manages well in typical home conditions.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
White LED
Software version during testing
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1064.4, E2500007, BT-S
33.20.81
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV Panel details
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV Panel details

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

LG UA75006LA (VA)

TV features

5.3/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home support, and various add-ons, including exclusive Samsung applications. There are also features such as AirPlay and Chromecast, which allow us to easily connect our phone to the television and stream multimedia.

Unfortunately, as this is the cheapest series from Samsung in 2025, the manufacturer has not decided to include a solar remote. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote, which visually resembles the newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for the typical "television" add-ons – the recording function and PiP (picture-in-picture) mode are missing. However, HDMI eARC works in its favour, allowing easy control of devices such as a decoder or soundbar with the remote included – and it truly works seamlessly.

Smart Features: WebOS

A big advantage of the LG UA7500 is the application of the webOS system. We gain access to a rich library of applications, support for AirPlay, screen mirroring and many additional features that allow for really convenient use of the television. Therefore, it is easy to connect a smartphone, watch something from streaming services, or use music applications. However, a downside is that webOS remains quite a "heavy" system and does not operate as smoothly on the UA7500 as it does on more expensive models. The situation is not aided by the fact that the manufacturer has not provided us here with a Magic remote with a cursor, which significantly speeds up navigation. We get a regular infrared remote, lacking that "magic" wand. Of course, it can be purchased separately, but considering the cost, it is often better to pay a bit more for a higher LG model that already includes such a remote.

Classic Features

In more traditional usage, the LG UA7500 also does not disappoint. The remote is equipped with a numeric keypad and a substantial number of buttons, which will certainly be appreciated by users accustomed to older solutions. Additionally, there is the ability to record programmes to USB from built-in tuners and a quite readable EPG interface, which makes planning a television viewing session easier. A downside remains the fact that the remote always requires aiming at the screen – but we believe that most more traditional users will be able to forgive it, viewing it as a familiar and reliable tool.

Apps

9.3/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
No

Samsung U8092F handles file playback quite seamlessly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but that is simply not found in any Samsung model.

Some reservations can be made regarding the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, while other extensions like SRT or SUB unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it's worth knowing. Perhaps it is an issue to be addressed in the future with an update to the television's operating system.

The media player on the UA7500 works fine – films or music start up without major issues, and this should be sufficient for most people. However, one thing caught our attention: the television does not play all photo formats. In practice, this means that if we upload photos straight from a smartphone to a USB drive, some may simply not open. It's a small detail, but it's worth keeping in mind. Fortunately, you can always use wireless screen sharing to display photos on the screen in another way.

Sound

5.7/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

U8092F does not pretend to have a home cinema on board. We receive a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds adequate, but without much excitement, although it does have a slight bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is entirely sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it managed to play a film with the built-in Dolby Atmos (JOC) codec – though of course, we are not talking about real surround sound.

In terms of sound, the LG UA7500 does not impress with powerful bass or the highest volume, but it plays surprisingly well. Our impression was that it performs better than most of the cheapest budget televisions and does quite well in everyday use. It will be just right for news, programmes, or series.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC