Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) vs Philips OLED811

Direct comparison

The Frame Pro / LS03HW

Info

OLED801 / OLED811

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

8.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    8.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.5

    8.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.9

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.5

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.3

    7.7

  • Sound quality

    6.4

    7.6

Advantages

  • Wall picture styling: interchangeable frames

  • Generous accessory package: wall mount and Wiralles One Connect included

  • Art Store - the best art scans on the market

  • Matte screen finish - no reflections

  • High brightness of 850 to 900 nits

  • Wide colour gamut (QLED)

  • Many gaming features: VRR, ALLM, refresh rate up to 240 Hz, Game Motion Plus

  • Smooth and clear motion: relatively low motion blur for a VA panel

  • Tizen operating system, rich in modern features

  • Three-sided Ambilight that creates a great atmosphere for viewing

  • Perfect blacks and excellent contrast from the OLED panel

  • Powerful HDR effect. Brightness around 1500 nits

  • Very good viewing angles

  • Excellent motion clarity (no smearing)

  • Supports 4K at 165 Hz

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Extensive gaming features

  • Support for multiple audio/video formats: (Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HDR10+, DTS)

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor black levels for a screen from the "Neo QLED" family (edge-lit backlight)

  • Art Store requires a monthly subscription (you can get around this by uploading your own photos 😉)

  • Poor viewing angles (they could be better for a stronger picture-on-the-wall effect)

  • High input lag when using the Wireless One Connect module

  • Smaller app library on Titan OS than on Google TV or most competitors

  • Infrared remote that needs to be pointed at the TV (sometimes responds slowly)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Visible posterization (mainly in bright scenes)

  • Underused image-processing capabilities of the Pentonic 800

Our verdict

The Frame Pro 2026 makes sense primarily when the TV is meant to look good in the living room and not be another large black slab on the wall. And here Samsung still does something that most manufacturers cannot reproduce as well. Flush mounting, interchangeable bezels, Art Mode, a matte finish and the wireless One Connect make it so that, when properly hung, The Frame Pro can actually look more like a piece of décor than AV equipment. In our view, it is the best-executed TV of this kind on the market. Importantly, you do not simply pay for the looks at the expense of everyday use. The Frame Pro is bright, the matte finish deals very well with reflections, so it performs really well in a well-lit living room. Colours are vivid, motion handling is very good, and there are surprisingly many gaming features for a TV that is, first and foremost, supposed to "look better".

More questions arise when you consider the "Pro" suffix and its classification as a Neo QLED screen. You might expect a big jump in picture quality compared with the regular The Frame, but in practice it is not that large. The TV uses Mini-LED backlighting and local dimming, but the dimming zones are located at the edges of the screen. That is a completely different approach from more advanced Mini-LED models, where the backlight works across the whole surface of the panel. In bright, colourful scenes this is not a major problem. It gets worse in the evening, especially in films with many dark shots. Then you can see that black levels and backlight control are noticeably weaker than in the best Mini-LED TVs. This is where it becomes most apparent that "Pro" does not, in this case, mean top-tier picture quality.

An interesting alternative is the Samsung S99H. It has a very design-led character, but in terms of picture it already goes much further. Of course it also costs significantly more, so it is not a direct replacement but rather an option for someone who wants to combine both worlds without major compromises. So is it worth buying The Frame Pro 2026? In our view yes, but only if you know what you are paying for. The greatest strengths of this TV are its looks, Art Mode, very good performance in a bright living room and the wireless One Connect. If that is what you are after, The Frame Pro is a very interesting proposition. However, if the main argument for paying extra is markedly better picture quality, we are less convinced. It is simply a better, more refined The Frame, not a full-fledged rival to the best Mini-LEDs.

Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals mainly for one thing: Ambilight. The light that follows the picture and spreads across the wall can change the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening the screen seems to extend beyond its borders and watching simply gains extra charm. For some it will be a pleasant extra, for others a sufficient reason to choose Philips again. The picture itself is very comparable to what models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H offer when using the same type of panel. So you get deep, perfect blacks on which bright elements make a strong impression. The OLED811 can deliver powerful HDR and, importantly, after calibration the picture itself is close to the reference. There is no big advantage over the competition, but there is also no feeling that by choosing Philips for Ambilight you are sacrificing image quality.

There are also a few good changes for gamers compared with last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset we finally have four HDMI 2.1 ports, so connecting several devices, for example consoles, a PC and a soundbar, no longer requires choosing which device will get the full capabilities of the port. Gaming itself is very enjoyable — the television responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates, and from a PC allows gaming in 4K at 165 Hz. It’s a pity that the new processor’s capabilities were not put to equally good use when processing lower-quality sources. The biggest concern, however, is the operating system. Titan OS replaced the popular Google TV and although it has clearly developed over the past year, it is still hard to call the change a positive one. The system runs more smoothly, has more useful features, and the app library already contains most popular streaming services. Nevertheless, the selection of apps is still much smaller than with Google or the competition, and in our view that remains the OLED811’s biggest drawback. People who use less popular services may particularly feel this difference.

Is it worth buying? Yes, if Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture and gaming capabilities the OLED811 has as much to offer as its rivals, but Ambilight gives it something others do not. So Philips both gives and takes. It adds a unique viewing atmosphere but limits freedom of app choice. If the apps you use are available, that compromise may be worth making.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
USB-C, Micro-HDMI
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Swivel
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, Wall bracket, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 24 (1 x 24)

Contrast:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,250:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Frame Pro formally belongs to the Neo QLED family, so it features a Mini-LED backlight. But it’s not the same kind of Mini-LED we know from most TVs in this series. Instead of a large number of zones placed behind the screen, this set has only a single row of zones along the edge. In practice it’s an edge-lit design that simply uses smaller LEDs. And unfortunately this becomes quite apparent in blacks. There is simply too little local dimming for the TV to cope well with more demanding scenes. In our measurements contrast most often fell in the range of 3000–5000:1, so it’s hard to speak of the kind of contrast typical of more sophisticated Mini-LED designs.

This is most visible when individual bright elements appear against a dark background. A larger portion of the picture lights up with them, which makes the blacks noticeably shallower, even navy blue. A scene from Sicario 2 illustrates this well. With the zones placed like this, the TV simply doesn’t have the precision to render it any other way. The Frame Pro uses Mini-LED, but its black performance is much closer to simpler designs. It’s a shame, because this was precisely the aspect we complained about most last year.

Black and contrast are categories where the Philips OLED811 showcases all the benefits of OLED technology. Each pixel lights independently and can be switched off completely, so black is simply black. There’s no grey glow or haloing around bright objects. During evening viewings this produces a great effect: stars in the night sky, city lights and text on dark backgrounds remain clearly separated from a perfectly black surround.

It’s therefore hard to expect any improvement here over other OLEDs, because in terms of black depth and contrast the result is already exemplary. The OLED811 doesn’t need local dimming or a compromise between the brightness of a small object and the black around it. Even a single bright point can sit next to a completely switched-off pixel, giving the image outstanding depth.

It’s in scenes with extensive black that the advantage over Mini LED TVs becomes clear. Even the most sophisticated local-dimming systems control larger areas of the image, so in demanding shots they can create a glow around bright elements or dim them to preserve a dark background. The Philips OLED811 doesn’t suffer from this problem.

HDR effect quality

6/10

7.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.0%, Bt.2020: 71.8%
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 74.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

834 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

536 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

545 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

460 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

668 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1225 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1310 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1443 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1368 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

626 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED811

Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW)

Luminance of RGB colors

One thing you cannot deny The Frame Pro is: brightness. At peak we measured around 850–900 nits, so the TV already has enough power to show many HDR scenes really impressively. Bright, full‑screen shots and more colourful frames perform best here. In such scenes The Frame Pro can make a good impression because the image is bright, punchy and has the effect we expect from HDR. In our measurements some scenes reached over 800 nits, and even in more challenging segments the TV maintained a quite respectable brightness level.

The problem starts when HDR depends on small bright elements shown on a dark background. Individual lamps, stars or highlights can be bright, but very often the black level across a larger part of the image also rises. As a result the bright point itself may look good, but the whole frame loses a lot of quality. Therefore The Frame Pro shows HDR best in scenes that are simply full‑screen. If a film or TV series has plenty of such shots, the effect can be really pleasant. In darker material the limitations of local dimming are much more noticeable.

Colours

The Frame Pro should be praised for its colour gamut coverage. The TV uses quantum dots, the solution known as QLED, which allows it to reproduce very well saturated colours. In our measurements coverage of the most important film gamut DCI‑P3 was around 94.5%, while the more demanding BT.2020 was about 72%.

These are very solid results that in most scenes allow for pleasant, saturated colours. Of course these figures are not as spectacular as in the latest screens using RGB backlighting, but The Frame Pro makes up for that with something else: colour stability. Regardless of the scene, colour saturation remains fairly consistent and there are no situations where the TV loses colour badly in more demanding shots.

Philips OLED811 uses a new generation of WOLED EX panels, also found in models such as the LG C6 and Samsung S90H. After calibration we measured around 1500 nits, which is a very good result for an OLED TV. You can see this clearly in films and series. All kinds of bright flashes have the right intensity, especially when they appear against a dark background. In such scenes the OLED811 can deliver truly impressive HDR. Of course, that does not mean you will see that level of brightness in every shot. When the screen is filled with a large amount of white or a wide explosion, brightness falls to around 600 nits. That is still a good result, but those scenes no longer have the same punch as small, bright elements on a dark background. This is a known limitation of OLEDs and the OLED811 is no exception.

Colours

Aside from HDR brightness, colours also matter and here Philips performs very well. It covers almost the entire DCI-P3 gamut, which contains most of the colours used in HDR films and series. You get saturated reds and lush greens, and when watching it’s hard to find major faults in that respect. It looks a little worse with the much wider BT.2020 gamut, whose most saturated shades are already out of reach for this panel. There is also the issue of the white subpixel that the WOLED panel uses to boost brightness. With very bright colours you can see a certain washout: the colour is bright but loses some of its intensity. It is precisely in such situations that QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display have the advantage. However, in most films and series this is not something that will immediately stand out.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In SDR material The Frame Pro in Filmmaker mode performs quite well, though it falls a little short of perfect. The white balance is relatively even, but as brightness increases the blue component drops, so the brighter parts of the image can have a slightly warmer tint. A bigger difference is visible in the gamma, that is the handling of the screen's brightness. For most of the range it runs below our reference point, which means the TV slightly brightens midtones. As a result the image can appear a little brighter and less contrasty than it should. The colour errors themselves are not huge, but they are noticeable enough that calibration could still bring considerable improvement.

In HDR content the white balance looks similar — for a large part of the range it is fairly even, with larger deviations appearing only at higher brightness. The EOTF curve is more interesting. The Frame Pro sticks reasonably close to the reference values in the brighter part of the image, but clearly brightens the darkest sections. This is mainly due to the design of the TV's backlight. That also affects colours. With less saturated hues the errors remain moderate, but as saturation increases they become much larger. In Colour Checker measurements a large portion of samples already show high error values. The factory HDR can therefore be regarded as decent, but it is certainly not an image we would call very faithful.

Film mode on the Philips OLED811 is sensibly set up straight out of the box. Most colour errors remain small, both in SDR and HDR, so you can sit down to watch without adjusting the settings first. There are no major inaccuracies that would immediately distract from the film. It falls a little short of perfection, though. The white balance shows a slight lack of red compared with green, so whites and greys can have a faint greenish tint. It is not a strong colour cast, but measurements clearly show it. There are also minor brightness deviations in SDR: some parts of the image are slightly brightened, and the darkest shades are not always reproduced evenly. In HDR the TV sticks much closer to the reference, although in places it gently lifts detail from the shadows. These are generally areas that could be improved. The factory film mode provides a good starting point, and calibration will reveal how much more can be gained from it.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

9.3/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration the biggest improvement is visible above all in SDR content. We managed to even out the white balance, but the more important change was the gamma correction, which before calibration had the greatest influence on the image character. After the adjustments the gamma curve is now very close to the reference, so the picture is not as bright in the midtones and simply looks more natural. Colour errors have also been significantly reduced, so the effect of calibration in SDR is clearly visible.

With HDR the situation is somewhat more complex. White balance has been improved and over part of the range the TV stays much closer to the reference, but deviations still appear at higher brightness levels. The same applies to colour reproduction: some errors can be corrected, but not all stem from the settings alone. This highlights the limitations of the TV's design and the way its backlight and local dimming affect HDR images. Therefore, with The Frame Pro calibration makes the biggest difference to everyday viewing. Regular TV, YouTube and films and series in SDR (mainly those from the cheaper tiers of streaming services) can look noticeably better afterwards.

After calibration the Philips OLED811 produces an image very close to the reference. We managed to correct the white balance and eliminate the slight tint visible in the factory settings. Errors in the Color Checker measurements for SDR and HDR fell to around 1 to 2, and many samples are even below 1. That's a level at which differences from the reference image are hard to spot with the naked eye. We also improved the gamma, and only in the brightest whites is there a slight brightening remaining. In HDR the EOTF curve also tracks the reference closely, although the TV still tends to gently boost the brightness of small elements, such as stars or on-screen text. This gives the picture a little extra sparkle that shouldn't be there, but otherwise there's little to fault. It was already good out of the box, and after calibration we managed to refine most of the remaining shortcomings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, The Frame Pro performs really well. In most content there is no obvious banding or unpleasant transitions between similar shades, and gradients look smooth and natural. Even in more demanding scenes with fog or dark transitions, issues are very rare. This is definitely one of the model's stronger points.

Compared with Philips' previous OLEDs the smoothness of tonal transitions has clearly improved. The biggest difference is visible in dark parts of the picture, which can cause WOLED panels a lot of trouble. On the OLED811 they have been smoothed very well, with tones transitioning smoothly from one to another without visible banding or contouring. That's a big plus, especially when viewing dark scenes.

Unfortunately, it's not as good in brighter scenes. That's where we have the biggest reservations: instead of a gentle transition between tones, in places you can see distinct boundaries, known as posterisation. It can be quite noticeable, and it's a shame that the improvement seen in dark scenes did not extend to the brighter parts of the image to a similar degree.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

6.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The Frame Pro uses the NQ4 AI Gen3 processor, so in terms of image processing it behaves very similarly to other newer Samsung TVs. Upscaling works really well – lower-resolution content is appropriately sharpened and the picture remains clear without excessive edge enhancement. With regular broadcast TV or lower-quality YouTube material this can provide a noticeable improvement, although viewers watching even older material, e.g. from VHS tapes, may notice a slight cropping of the image on the left side (overscan).

It's a bit different when improving more highly compressed footage by reducing noise and artefacts such as posterization. The "Noise reduction" function can improve poor material, but fairly quickly it begins to alter the picture and remove fine details and grain. Therefore it's best to use it sparingly and mainly when the source truly requires it.

OLED811 handles lower-quality material reasonably well, though it falls well short of perfection. The "Banding reduction" function helps to smooth tonal transitions and on the low setting gives a fairly good result. It does not remove bands between shades as effectively as similar solutions from some competitors, but at least it does not introduce new artefacts in the process. This is a sensible setting for everyday viewing. There is still some dissatisfaction, however, because the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset used here can, in other manufacturers' implementations, cope with the effects of heavy compression more effectively even at similarly low settings. Much therefore depends on how a given manufacturer makes use of its capabilities. We have a few more comments about the upscaling to 4K. There is a lot of detail, but the overall image looks rather soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which robs the picture of a bit of sharpness and clarity. This can be partly corrected with the sharpness slider in the menu, though that will merely accentuate outlines rather than recover detail. On the plus side, there is no overscan; even with an SD signal the TV does not crop the edges of the picture.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
70%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

The Frame Pro comes with a 144 Hz panel, and when connected to a PC it also supports 240 Hz at Full HD resolution. That feature is primarily aimed at PC gamers, but the TV also performs very well at the standard 120 Hz refresh rate used for watching sport or gaming on consoles. A key advantage is the low level of motion blur. For a VA panel, The Frame Pro does very well in this respect. You don't see the strong, dark trailing smears behind moving objects that we often encounter on TVs with this type of panel. As a result, fast-paced sport and dynamic games remain clear in motion. Of course there's also motion smoothing with adjustable smoothness, so for films and sports broadcasts we can tailor the motion character to our preferences. You'll find our recommended settings in the photo.

In terms of motion handling the OLED811 performs excellently. At 120 Hz, which is useful for console gaming and watching sport, the picture stays clear and moving objects do not leave noticeable smears. The fast response of OLED pixels helps here; this is clear in the UFO test, even on dark backgrounds. There are also motion smoothing controls. For films you can adjust the level of smoothing to suit your taste, ranging from preserving a cinematic character to much smoother motion. A separate blur reduction setting is useful for fast-paced material such as sports broadcasts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Functionally for gamers The Frame Pro has a great deal to offer. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, VRR, ALLM and a properly implemented HGiG. When connected to a PC you can also use 144 Hz at 4K, and even 240 Hz when dropping to Full HD. Samsung also includes its standard suite of gaming extras. There is an expanded Game Bar that lets you quickly view and change the most important settings, and Game Motion Plus, which can improve the smoothness of games running at 30 or 60 frames per second. On top of that there is the Gaming Hub and the option to play in the cloud without needing to connect a console. The only real omission is Dolby Vision Gaming, which Samsung does not support. Apart from that, The Frame Pro offers virtually everything you can expect from a well-equipped gaming TV today.

OLED811 has almost everything you could expect from a TV for gaming. It supports 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K, and when connected to a PC it can reach 165 Hz. It also has VRR, which helps prevent screen tearing when frame rates fluctuate, and ALLM, which automatically switches to game mode. So you don't have to dig into the settings every time you power up your console.

Another plus is that HGiG works correctly, so once HDR is set on the console the TV doesn't apply its own changes to image brightness. There's also a Game Bar to check signal parameters and quickly change settings useful while gaming. The list even includes Dolby Vision for gaming, but there is a significant catch, which you can read about below.

Input lag

10/10

8.8/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
14 ms
1080p120
7 ms
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
157 ms
2160p120 DV
57 ms

On The Frame Pro, input lag depends mainly on where you plug in your console or PC. We measured it with a direct connection to the Micro HDMI 2.1 port on the back of the TV, because that is the setup we'd recommend for gaming. In that case the results are very good, about 13 ms at 60 Hz and 7 ms at 120 Hz.

A much worse picture appears when the console is connected to the wireless One Connect module. In our case the module sat about 2.5 metres from the TV, next to the sofa and with no major obstructions in between. Despite that, the delay increased to roughly 60–70 ms at 60 Hz and 30–40 ms at 120 Hz. And you can really feel that difference. So if you want to play on The Frame Pro, it's best to plug the console directly into the TV.

Input lag Wireless One Connect (approx. 2.5 m from the TV)

SDR

HDR

1080p 60 Hz: 61

2160p 60 Hz HDR: 71

1080p 120 Hz: 39

2160p 120 Hz HDR: 32

2160p 60 Hz: 63

2160p 120 Hz: 32

The OLED811 responds instantly. We measured 14 ms at 60 Hz and just 5 ms at 120 Hz, both in Full HD and 4K. Those are excellent results that let you comfortably play even fast online titles. Unfortunately, when Dolby Vision is enabled the situation changes dramatically: at 60 Hz latency rises to 157 ms, and at 120 Hz it is 57 ms. The first figure in particular already means a clearly noticeable delay between input on the controller and the on-screen response. For gaming, it’s definitely better to stick with HDR10.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RGWB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The Frame Pro performs well when connected to a PC. It supports full 4:4:4, 144 Hz at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD. It also works with both NVIDIA's G-Sync and AMD's FreeSync. However, it's not ideal for working with text. From a normal viewing distance everything looks fine, but up close you can see minor artefacts around fonts and slightly less clean edges. This doesn't matter much for gaming or watching content, but it can be noticeable when doing office work.

The Philips OLED811 works very well with a PC. The manufacturer has finally managed to implement 4:4:4 chroma correctly, even at maximum resolution and refresh rate. As a result, small text and coloured edges are legible, without blurring or rainbow artefacts caused by loss of colour information. Dark text on dark backgrounds also performs well, which is something TVs can struggle with. There are still minor imperfections related to the RGWB subpixel layout. Fonts are not as sharp as on a conventional RGB monitor, and white letters can show faint red outlines up close. From a normal viewing distance you hardly notice it, though sitting close to the screen at a desk makes it easier to spot.

The most fun, however, comes from gaming on a PC. The combination of 4K at 165 Hz, functional G-Sync and input lag of around 5 ms makes the OLED811 excellent for that. If you have a PC that can take advantage of such a refresh rate, it’s definitely worth connecting it to the Philips.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

7.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
72%
32%

The Frame Pro’s viewing angles are mediocre at best, if not poor. The TV uses a conventional VA panel, and at wider angles the image loses quality fairly quickly. Brightness falls first and foremost, but colour saturation also noticeably fades, making the picture look more washed out. That’s a bit more of a shame with The Frame Pro than with a regular television. It’s a model that is often intended to hang on a wall and also serve as a piece of art, so better viewing angles would be genuinely welcome here.

The viewing angles on the OLED811 are excellent and among the best on the market. Even sitting well off to the side, you still see an image with deep blacks and well-saturated colours. This is a big advantage over LCD screens, as you don't have to sit directly in front to enjoy good picture quality.

QD-OLED panels do even better, keeping colours truer at angles. On the Philips, at greater off‑axis angles white shifts slightly towards greenish hues, but the effect is so small that it is hard to find it bothersome during viewing. We'd even say that, in this respect, we've come across the best WOLED panel unit we've tested so far.

Daytime performance

6.5/10

6/10

Panel finish
Matte
Glare
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED811: 392 cd/m2

Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW): 587 cd/m2

During the day The Frame Pro performs quite well. SDR brightness stays around 600 nits, so even in a more brightly lit room the picture remains clear. The biggest advantage, however, is the matte screen coating, which diffuses reflections very effectively and means lamps or windows are far less visible on the screen. We did notice, though, that on this year’s model the coating affects the image a little more. With more light blacks appear slightly lifted and colours lose some of their depth. It’s still a very good option for a bright living room, but in that respect the screen is not entirely without compromises.

OLED811 copes with daytime viewing, though in a very bright living room it has its limitations. Maximum SDR brightness reaches around 600 nits, comparable to the LG C6 or the Samsung S90H, which use the same panel. That’s noticeably more than entry-level OLEDs and will be more than enough for most people. However, bear in mind this brightness is not sustained across the whole screen; it falls with large areas of white, and our average measurement was about 392 nits.

A bigger problem can be direct reflections from windows or lamps. The glossy coating suppresses them reasonably well, but they are still clearly visible on the screen, especially in dark scenes. It doesn’t diffuse them as effectively as matte screens, so placing the TV opposite a large window is not the best idea. On the plus side, blacks remain very good even during the day. In a typical living room the Philips will cope without major issues, but with strong sunlight falling directly on the screen you will want blinds.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
1204
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED811 TV Panel details

Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW)

Philips OLED811

TV features

7.7/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    USB-C, Micro-HDMI
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Tizen and Smart TV features

The Smart TV features are, of course, handled by Tizen. The system runs smoothly and offers a very large selection of streaming apps. It also supports AirPlay, Miracast and voice search in Polish. In this respect The Frame Pro is not particularly different from other new Samsung models. We simply get the manufacturer's extensive, well-functioning system.

Art Mode and Art Store

The Art Mode is naturally much more interesting, as it is one of the most important features of the entire The Frame series. When switched off the TV can display artworks, photographs or graphics instead of a black screen, and can quite convincingly mimic a traditional framed picture on the wall. Samsung provides access to the Art Store, where the selection of works is really large and the materials themselves are prepared to a very high quality. The problem is that full access requires a subscription, and in our view that is a significant downside for a TV whose main selling point is this very feature. Fortunately we are not tied to the Art Store. You can upload your own photos or graphics, so nothing prevents you from finding a high-resolution artwork yourself and displaying it on the screen. The automation of this mode is also very well designed. The Frame Pro not only has an ambient light sensor, which can adapt the appearance of the displayed image to the room, but also a presence sensor. The TV can therefore detect when someone is in the room and automatically start Art Mode.

Classic features

As for classic TV features, The Frame Pro offers a fairly basic set of conveniences. It has DVB-T/T2, DVB-S/S2 and DVB-C tuners, teletext, an audio-only mode and the ability to use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speakers at the same time. However, it lacks the ability to record programmes to USB, PiP and a more advanced remote, for example one with a numeric keypad. The remote operates via radio, so you do not have to point it at the screen.

Smart features: Titan OS

It's the Smart TV system that is the most controversial change in the OLED811. Philips dropped the user-favorite Google TV in favor of its own Titan OS. For many people this may be hard to accept, although Titan has been getting better every year and runs noticeably smoother. We have working AirPlay, screen mirroring from a computer, and voice search in Polish. System responsiveness has improved too, though minor delays still occur when navigating menus. We suspect the infrared remote is partly to blame, as it doesn't always register commands immediately. The biggest limitation compared with Google TV remains a smaller app selection. That doesn't mean it's empty — you'll find Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, and Apple TV was recently added to the library. If you mainly use popular services, Titan should be enough, but it's worth checking availability of lesser-known apps before buying (list at the bottom 😉).

Ambilight

Ambilight is still one of the best reasons to consider a Philips. On the OLED811 it's three-sided — LEDs at the top and along the sides of the chassis light the wall with colors matched to what's happening on screen. In the evening it creates a great effect and can change the mood of the whole room, which is why we awarded extra points for this feature. You don't have to use dynamic picture tracking though. If you prefer calmer viewing conditions, you can set a steady white light. That's a nice option for evening sessions when you don't want to sit in front of a bright screen in a completely dark room.

Classic features

For regular TV watching the OLED811 performs well, although there is no USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP). You can connect Bluetooth headphones and use them at the same time as the TV speakers. What bothers us most is the aforementioned infrared control. The remote itself is really interestingly designed: it has backlighting and a hybrid keyboard with a numeric section. It's a shame you have to aim it at the TV like with old remotes. For equipment at this level we'd prefer to just press buttons without wondering which way we're holding the remote. Hopefully Philips will fix that in future models.

Apps

9.3/10

7.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The Frame Pro handles playback of files from USB storage well. Most common video, audio and photo formats work correctly, so you’re unlikely to need to connect a laptop just to play a film or browse photos. What we miss most is support for HEIC, the format commonly used for photos taken on iPhones. So Apple users will therefore have to convert such photos beforehand to a supported format or simply stream them to the TV via AirPlay. Other than that, the player works very well.

The USB player in the OLED811 handles most of the audio and video formats we test, so it's perfectly adequate for watching a film or playing music from a USB stick. However, our main reservations are about photos, specifically its oddly selective handling of their resolutions. The TV opened 8, 16 and 32MP files but couldn't cope with the rest. It's not that the photos are simply too large. The player can display a higher-resolution image yet refuse to open a smaller one. When browsing holiday snaps this can be simply irritating, because some of them will need to be converted on a computer first... or you could just mirror your screen remotely...😉

Sound

6.4/10

7.6/10

  • Maximum volume
    89dB
    93dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The Frame Pro's sound is adequate and has changed little from last year's model. The TV handles dialogue particularly well, with voices clear and easy to hear. However, it lacks stronger bass, so films and music don't have much depth. Therefore, if better sound matters, it's worth considering a soundbar when buying The Frame Pro. Models from the S series are particularly well suited, as their slim design complements the TV's appearance. Finally, it's worth noting that The Frame Pro supports Dolby Atmos, so with a compatible soundbar or AV receiver you can enjoy surround sound. It does not support DTS, which is worth bearing in mind when playing films from your own library, for example Blu-ray discs.

There have been a few concrete changes to the audio compared with last year’s OLED820. The rear subwoofer is gone, and the 4.1 speaker layout has been replaced by a 2.2 configuration. Despite these changes, the OLED811 still sounds good and fairly balanced. It can play louder, and the sound even seems a little fuller than a year ago. However, the bass has suffered. Although the sound has some weight, the low end lacks the depth of its predecessor. It’s easiest to hear this in films and music, when you’re waiting for a bigger punch. Still, this is well above average for built‑in TV speakers. If you want deeper bass and clearer spatial effects, it’s worth considering a soundbar or a system with an AV receiver. Philips gives plenty of freedom here: it supports both Dolby Atmos and DTS, and can pass Dolby TrueHD tracks over HDMI eARC to compatible equipment. So there are options if we decide to expand the audio setup in future.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

89dBC (Max)

75dBC

93dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy