The Samsung S85F in the tested version with a WOLED panel is a television that must be judged primarily in light of its price. True to organic technology, it offers perfect, almost ideal blacks and infinite contrast in cinematic conditions. This feature alone will impress the majority of buyers, especially those upgrading from any LCD television. However, it cannot be denied that in a direct comparison with the 55-inch QD-OLED variant, the WOLED version shows some weaknesses. It is slightly darker, particularly in bright full-screen scenes, and offers noticeably poorer viewing angles. Nonetheless, the other advantages remain intact. Motion fluidity is at a high level—the 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action films excellently. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will enjoy a full set of benefits: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In everyday use, the Tizen system assisted us—closed, yet extremely polished. It responds quickly, offers a rich selection of apps, and features like AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find anything more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F in the WOLED variant is not a perfect television and yields to its sibling with the QD-OLED panel. However, its biggest weapon is its absurdly low price. The purchase cost is downright laughable in relation to the capabilities offered. It is still a great and, above all, inexpensive OLED that will be one of the best and most cost-effective televisions on the market for a vast array of users.
Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines in many ways what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel means we are at an absolute peak in terms of picture quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode creates effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we are watching films in a sunlit living room or gaming at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.
However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel mingles with a certain feeling of inadequacy when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions or posterisation in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we were hoping for a significantly greater quality leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness thus becomes the biggest problem of this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not even about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant picture generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins in the audio department, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the pricier 950 model in favour of a different design. We thus face a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we must pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.