Samsung S85F (WOLED) vs Philips OLED950

Direct comparison

S85F / FAU / FAE

Info

OLED950 / OLED+

Available screen sizes: 65”77”83”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.8

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.9

    8.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.6

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.0

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    5.3

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    6.5

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.2

    8.2

Advantages

  • Revolutionary black and contrast

  • Great picture in SDR and HDR content after calibration

  • Very good motion fluidity – 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps

  • Advanced and smoothly operating Tizen system

  • Solar Remote with multiple capabilities

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test screens (Tandem OLED panel)

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent gaming features: support for 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of apps

  • Backlit remote, charged via USB-C connector

Disadvantages

No like
  • No USB recording function and PiP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Poorer viewing angles, colour gamut coverage, and lower brightness compared to the variant with a QD-OLED panel

  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterisation

Our verdict

The Samsung S85F in the tested version with a WOLED panel is a television that must be judged primarily in light of its price. True to organic technology, it offers perfect, almost ideal blacks and infinite contrast in cinematic conditions. This feature alone will impress the majority of buyers, especially those upgrading from any LCD television. However, it cannot be denied that in a direct comparison with the 55-inch QD-OLED variant, the WOLED version shows some weaknesses. It is slightly darker, particularly in bright full-screen scenes, and offers noticeably poorer viewing angles. Nonetheless, the other advantages remain intact. Motion fluidity is at a high level—the 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action films excellently. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will enjoy a full set of benefits: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In everyday use, the Tizen system assisted us—closed, yet extremely polished. It responds quickly, offers a rich selection of apps, and features like AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find anything more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F in the WOLED variant is not a perfect television and yields to its sibling with the QD-OLED panel. However, its biggest weapon is its absurdly low price. The purchase cost is downright laughable in relation to the capabilities offered. It is still a great and, above all, inexpensive OLED that will be one of the best and most cost-effective televisions on the market for a vast array of users.

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines in many ways what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel means we are at an absolute peak in terms of picture quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode creates effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we are watching films in a sunlit living room or gaming at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel mingles with a certain feeling of inadequacy when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions or posterisation in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we were hoping for a significantly greater quality leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness thus becomes the biggest problem of this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not even about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant picture generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins in the audio department, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the pricier 950 model in favour of a different design. We thus face a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we must pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Base adjustment
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

10/10

Contrast:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

When it comes to blacks and contrast, we must be honest – this is the area where the differences between QD-OLED and WOLED panels are virtually non-existent under typical cinematic conditions. We confirm with full responsibility: the Samsung S85F equipped with a WOLED panel achieves amazing and unparalleled results in this respect. Regardless of the scene being watched – whether it's a dynamic action movie or a dark thriller – we receive infinite contrast and perfect black that we expect from any OLED television. These are results that can impress even the most discerning cinephiles. It is worth emphasizing that such deep, absolute black can only be offered by televisions with organic panels. In cinematic conditions, as we see in our measurements, the level of black luminance is zero. So, if you dream of a screen that can "switch off" the light in a scene just as effectively as an independent cinema in a dark room, we are pleased to state that the S85F, also in the WOLED variant, is one of those televisions.

There is not much to elaborate on here. As with every OLED television, the black and contrast quality in the Philips OLED950 is simply perfect. Regardless of the film scene being watched, night shots, or materials in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without any halos or brightening. This is one of the greatest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED televisions. There is no game of local dimming algorithms or compromises here. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a feature of our test sample, more related to the character of image reproduction than to the black quality itself. In this regard, everything here is at the highest level.

HDR effect quality

5.9/10

8.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 97.0%, Bt.2020: 70.7%
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

672 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

673 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

670 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

276 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED950

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

Luminance of RGB colors

Luminance of RGB colors

For the majority of the time, let's say in 90% of film scenes, viewers will see virtually no difference between the versions of the S85F. When small, but very bright light points appear on the screen – a lantern in a dark alley, an explosion, the sun breaking through the clouds – this WOLED panel (similar to the smaller S85F) performs exceptionally well. Our measurements indicated a peak brightness of around 750 nits. We can state with full confidence: this is a great result that guarantees fantastic HDR effects. The problem arises in a very specific, uncomfortable situation for any OLED. We're talking about the moment when the entire screen must light up at full power brightly. Examples include a scene with a white background, a skiing scene, or our test sequences (5) from the film The Meg. And here, unfortunately, the results diverge significantly to the detriment of the variant with the WOLED panel. Our measurement equipment was able to register a maximum brightness of around 250 to 300 nits in such conditions. To be clear: the same model with a QD-OLED panel in the same test is nearly twice as bright. The second matter: colours. And here, we also have to be honest – QD-OLED has a structural advantage. Why? It's simple. QD-OLED generates colours from three components (red, green, and blue) and does not require an additional white subpixel. The WOLED panel we are testing here uses that white subpixel mainly to boost overall brightness. The effect is that QD-OLED is able to show a slightly wider colour palette and the colours are somewhat "purer". But to be clear: it's not that the colours on this WOLED panel are bad! On the contrary, they are really very good. The coverage of the DCI-P3 film palette at 97% and 71% for the broader BT.2020 palette is still high-end. We just need to honestly admit that this few percentage points of advantage in colour coverage lies with QD-OLED technology and may be noticeable in very specific moments.

The OLED950 is a phenomenal television for consuming content in HDR format, primarily thanks to the innovative Tandem OLED panel. With this technology, the screen can generate astronomical brightness levels, reaching over 2000 nits in film scenes (on test patterns). This is an exceptional result that places the OLED950 among the world’s top displays available on the market. However, it is important to note a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, brightness can drop by as much as half. It is worth emphasising, though, that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for the HDR image to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of bright scenes.

The use of the Tandem OLED panel has also brought tangible benefits in terms of colour reproduction, improving elements that traditional WOLED panels struggled with compared to their QD-OLED competition. For the OLED950, the colour gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 colour space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high standards of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world use. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colours look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

When it comes to factory colour reproduction, our test sample in SDR mode suffered from a slight deficit of red and yellow colours. This resulted in a faint yellowish tint visible in shades of white. However, this is not the biggest problem with the S85F. As with the variant with a QD-OLED panel, the main issue with this model is the way it presents HDR content. When we look at the EOTF curve chart, it is easy to see that the television has quite significant problems with strong image clipping. Such behaviour causes the final image in many scenes to become very unnatural.

We tested the OLED950 model in Film mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice it proved not to be free from flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge was not the white balance itself – although it did show a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish hue. The main issue lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. The analysis of the gamma graph and the EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively exposes brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology allows. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, which is why – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

9/10

9.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After conducting calibration in Filmmaker mode, we managed to eliminate most of the unwanted effects. In SDR content, the television performs excellently, with its colour reproduction errors not exceeding a value of 2, which is an outstanding result. HDR content looks slightly worse, though still very good. Although we were able to eliminate the significant unnaturalness of the image caused by the excessively high EOTF curve, the most discerning observers may notice that it is not perfectly aligned. It runs slightly below the reference curve, which would suggest that the S85F has minor difficulties in showcasing all the details in the image. We must emphasise here that it is very unlikely that the average viewer will notice any shortcomings in the image. The final effect after calibration is evaluated as exemplary.

As can be seen, the OLED950, after a professional calibration process, transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display that, without a shadow of a doubt, can be placed alongside the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in the Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the colour palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering image quality of the highest order.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.3/10

7.1/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Another drawback of the S85F version with the WOLED panel, noticeable compared to the QD-OLED variant, is the quality of the fluidity of tonal transitions. In very bright moments, it is evident that the colour blending is not perfect, and sometimes it can be spotted with the naked eye. Although the overall quality of gradients is still good, certain issues with the panel produced by LG Displays are apparent, which are not as noticeable in competing panels (QD-OLED).

If we were to point out the weaker aspect of the OLED950 model in comparison to market competitors like the G5 and S95F, it would be the digital signal processing – just like with most televisions from this manufacturer. Although the processor used here is termed “dual,” our practical tests did not reveal significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are, in fact, symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, particularly dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterisation. However, it must be clearly stated that this is a “flaw” that the average viewer will very rarely notice during normal usage, and the overall perception remains at a high level.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The processing of tonal transitions (gradients) in the S85F is at a high level. The television effectively handles posterisation (the "banding" effect of colours), even with heavily compressed content, e.g., from streaming services. However, using this feature requires a certain compromise. We noticed that the noise reduction algorithm is quite aggressive – even at the lowest setting, it can eliminate natural film grain, which for many viewers is part of the film's aesthetics. The "Standard" setting seems to be a happy medium, not causing a noticeable loss of important details, which is why we can recommend it. However, we advise against using the "High" level, which, in addition to noise, also removes desirable details such as texture or structure of objects on the screen.

The upscaling process of lower resolution content works very well in the S85F. The image is sharpened and clear. The only minor imperfection we managed to observe is occasional, subtle aliasing on the edges. The television still exhibits characteristics typical of this manufacturer, namely active "overscan" (slight image enlargement). It is worth keeping this in mind, especially when watching older content, as it may result in minimal clipping of the original frame.

Upscaling

In terms of the image upscaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Low-resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. This kind of presentation will certainly appeal to many people. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can lightly enhance them with the appropriate slider in the television's menu. It's really hard to find fault in this aspect. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no issue with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The function for smoothing tonal transitions performs somewhat worse. In the settings, we find an option called "Distortion Reduction." This allows for three levels of adjustment of the processor's interference. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out actors' skin details. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It definitely removes too much detail from the faces and background elements, and can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth experimenting with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preference. It may seem that the Medium option is the best compromise here.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

S85F is a model with impressive speed. The use of a 120 Hz OLED panel ensures that dynamic scenes, both in games and during sports broadcasts, meet expectations: smoothly, sharply, and without loss of clarity. A key role here is played by the instant response time of the pixels, which is a natural advantage of OLED technology. Frame transitions are instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. Moving objects, such as a ball on the pitch or a car in a chase scene, are clear and devoid of the characteristic motion blur associated with LCD panels (the so-called "ghosting").

The motion reproduction in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the panel shows no blurring at all. This allows us to enjoy perfect sharpness in practically any conditions. Much of this is thanks not only to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.2/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The 85F has practically everything on board to become the dream screen for gaming. It features four full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, support for VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). Additionally, there's a super-detailed Game Bar, which clearly displays all the key parameters. However, the real gem is the Game Motion Plus feature. This motion smoother dedicated to games makes animations more pleasant to the eye while only slightly increasing input lag. This is a rare and well-working combination, for which Samsung deserves great applause.

Now for the moment where we have to complain a bit. The lack of Dolby Vision in Samsung TVs is already a standard, so there's no point in holding out hope (unless something changes in the future). Unfortunately, it's much harder to explain the disappearance of support for HGiG after one of the software updates. HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) is a key mode that allows for precise brightness representation in HDR games, according to the creators' intent. Without it, HDR calibration on consoles becomes less precise, potentially leaving us with images that are too dark in the shadows or excessively blown out in the bright areas. Perhaps Samsung will fix this in the next update – we have high hopes for that. Because if HGiG returns, the S85F will become nearly the perfect TV for gamers.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung TVs from the 2025 model year due to the release of software version 1131, which has restored the HGiG feature essential for gamers.

The OLED950 is nearly the perfect television for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere created by the Ambilight system during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the robust hardware support. You will find literally everything you should expect from a modern gaming display. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the automatic ALLM game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal without difficulty, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most visually appealing on the market, it fully accomplishes its purpose. It displays all the important signal parameters and offers useful extras. Gamers can take advantage of the minimap zoom feature or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. The contrast range adjustment also proves to be useful, as it allows you to brighten shadows and gain better visibility of enemies hidden in dark corners of the map.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
12 ms
1080p120
5 ms
5 ms
2160p60
10 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

In this category, the S85F shows its true colours. The values measured by us – 5 ms for 120 Hz content and around 10 ms for 60 Hz – are results that can be described in one word in the world of televisions: phenomenal. This means that the response to a player's movements is practically instantaneous. Pressing a button on the pad results in action on the screen without any noticeable delay. In dynamic games, where a fraction of a second determines victory or defeat, such values make a huge difference. There is no question of a nervous "waiting" for the image to catch up with our commands. The S85F provides a sense of complete control – and that's how it should be in equipment aspiring to be the perfect screen for gamers.

As we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated almost reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via the controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
BWRG
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

And what about connecting to a computer? We rush to answer: the S85F performs excellently in this regard. The combination of lightning-fast input lag and a 120 Hz panel is the recipe for successful gaming on a PC. Both fast-paced shooters and calmer RPG titles benefit from the instant response and fluidity of animation, which can immerse you for long hours. Of course, it’s not perfect. We must mention the specific construction of the WOLED panel. It consists of four subpixels (WRGB), which is a different structure from the classic RGB known from monitors. As a result, if we sit very close to the screen, we may notice that the fonts are not as perfectly sharp as we would like them to be. However, this is not a major issue and shouldn't interfere with everyday use. Especially since the television correctly supports a 4:4:4 chroma signal.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It performs excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. Here we have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low input lag. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we look at the readability of the fonts. We are not just referring to the unusual subpixel arrangement of WOLED panels (BWRG), which causes a specific colouration of the text edges in all TVs of this type. The tested model has trouble properly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colourful text on another colourful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artefacts. It's a bit of a shame, although we must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as an office monitor, you may feel disappointed.

Viewing angles

7.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
29%

As befits OLED technology, the viewing angles on the S85F are very good. The image retains its properties even when viewed from the side, which is a clear advantage over most LCD televisions. However, we must note that this is not the level known from QD-OLED panels. In the case of the tested WOLED panel, with a significant deviation from the screen axis, a slight decrease in brightness and a subtle change in white tones can be observed. QD-OLED remains unparalleled in this respect, offering an almost perfect picture regardless of the angle from which we view it.

As is fitting for organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where on the sofa we are looking at the screen. The only reservation arises when directly comparing the Tandem OLED matrix used here with the competition's solutions. In comparison with last year's LG panels equipped with MLA filters or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they generally still maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it is hard to consider this a disadvantage.

Daytime performance

5.3/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

Samsung S85F (WOLED): 305 cd/m2

We must state clearly that working in a brightly lit room is not the strong point of the S85F. We are dealing with a rather moderately bright OLED panel here. Our measurements indicated that the average screen brightness in "TV" mode hovers around 300 nits. For some users, this may be a value that is too low, particularly in rooms with a lot of daylight. Of course, this television would be perfect for moderately bright living rooms. However, it is not a model we would recommend for exceptionally bright, heavily sunlit interiors. This problem is exacerbated by the anti-reflective coating applied. We noticed that it does not suppress reflections from the surroundings as effectively as the version with the QD-OLED panel, especially when direct sunlight hits the screen.

The OLED950 model will perform well in very bright rooms without any concerns. A key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. The performance is impressive for OLED technology. It can confidently be stated that in this respect, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant advantage of the tested device.

However, there is a certain drawback that can be described as a Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has applied a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It is worth bearing this in mind when planning the position of the television in relation to windows, as reflections may be noticeable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details

TV features

7.3/10

6.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features

Features of the Classic S85F Television

The S85F was not really designed with fans of traditional television in mind. We won’t find the PiP feature here (which is somewhat surprising, as Samsung usually offers it) nor the ability to record programmes onto USB from the built-in tuners. Fortunately, the basics are there – teletext and a clear channel guide – so this is perfectly sufficient for everyday viewing. The included remote, although simple at first glance and lacking a number pad, allows control of multiple devices. This way, when connecting a Canal+ decoder, you won't need to have two remotes on the table – one from the television will suffice.

SmartTV S85F: Tizen

The smart part is a completely different story. Tizen is one of the most advanced operating systems in televisions. It operates smoothly and supports all popular internet features – from screen mirroring, to AirPlay, to voice search. The strongest point of Tizen is its integration with the SmartThings app, which can serve as a control centre for the entire home. Of course, like any closed system, Tizen has its limitations – for example, it has a smaller library of applications than GoogleTV. However, looking at the current list of available applications, it is hard to point out anything that might actually be missing.

Smart Features

The biggest plus of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favour of TitanOS, but here we are fortunately still provided with a full Android-based environment. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, we have once again been unable to launch Windows Miracast in the editorial office, despite the manufacturer's claim that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics", the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most objections arise regarding the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed with backlighting, "hybrid" switching between typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charging via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly wanes when it turns out that you need to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S85F performs excellently – practically everything you put on a pendrive or hard drive will be played without the slightest problem. Small shortcomings occur only in the support of some less popular photo formats, but for the vast majority of you, this will be more than sufficient. Therefore, it can be confidently said that the built-in player is more than solid for home use.

The factory file player in the OLED950 model works simply brilliantly. During our tests, the device handled virtually every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks or photos, the television played them without issue. It is difficult to find weak points in the handling of the most popular standards. However, if someone still feels something is lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not solely dependent on default solutions. At any time, we can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This gives us the assurance that the television can handle literally any file from our home library.

Sound

7.2/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    80dB
    85dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The built-in speakers with 20 W power on paper may not seem impressive, but in practice, the S85F can surprise. It sounds really pleasant, and at times you can even catch a hint of bass, which is not a given in this class of speakers. The television does not support the DTS format, which has unfortunately become the standard for most manufacturers by 2025. A nice surprise, however, is the support for Dolby Atmos. Of course, to talk about "spatial" sound with two speakers placed at the bottom of the casing would be a slight exaggeration, but it is good that Samsung offers such a feature in this model at all.

The 2.1 speaker setup used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a really solid dose of proper sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the enclosure, the sound is deep and has a definite impact. This element is often missing in cheaper designs, where bass is virtually non-existent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That television, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you are big fans of Ambilight, and you deal with sound through an external home cinema or soundbar anyway.

Sound Quality Test