Samsung QN990F vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA (wide viewing angle)

Resolution: 7680x4320

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.7

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.6

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    9.2

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.9

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    5.2

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    7.5

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.3

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    5.8

Advantages

  • Amazing Design

  • Wireless module Wiraless One Connect

  • Excellent black

  • High brightness

  • Matte display very effectively reduces reflections

  • Good viewing angles

  • The fastest TV in the world - refresh rate 4K@240Hz and 8K@120Hz excellent for sports

  • Many features for gamers: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Gamebar

  • Very fast and intuitive operating system Tizen OS

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast of the VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Support for HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap television)

  • Good readability of fonts – works well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with a numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very high price

  • Local dimming algorithms could be improved

  • Lack of Dolby Vision and DTS:X

  • High input lag when wirelessly connected to Wiraless One Connect

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Absence of any smoothness-enhancing features makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface works slowly, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

Our verdict

The Samsung QN990F is a television that makes a huge impression from the very first moment. It's probably one of the most attractive models on the market – ultra-slim, with an almost invisible frame and a base that gives the impression that the screen is levitating above the table. In addition, there's the futuristic Wiraless One Connect module, this time in a wireless version, which helps to reduce the number of cables in the living room and adds a modern character to the whole setup. But it doesn't end with the design. The QN990F also boasts powerful specifications. The Mini-LED with over a thousand dimming zones can generate contrast that at times rivals OLEDs. "Additionally, there is very high HDR brightness and a new matte panel that effectively eliminates reflections. And when we add great motion fluidity with a refresh rate reaching up to 240 Hz in 4K, we have a set of features that truly impress. Samsung hasn't forgotten about gamers either – we have Game Bar, VRR, ALLM, as well as five HDMI 2.1 ports and phenomenal input lag of 10–15 ms (when connected via micro HDMI).

And this is where we get to the crux of the matter. Because while the QN990F impresses on paper and in many tests, in practice some solutions still require refinement. The wireless One Connect module raises the input lag to unacceptable levels for gamers, the Mini-LED can struggle in difficult scenes with a lot of detail, and the lack of Dolby Vision or DTS:X serves as a reminder that Samsung is stubbornly forging its own path, sometimes at the expense of the user. Despite this, the QN990F is a television that indicates the direction of industry development. It is not a model for everyone – but for those who love gadgets, technological innovations, and want a screen in their living room that looks like it came from the future. However, if someone is looking exclusively for the best picture quality, even in Samsung's portfolio there are models that perform significantly better – perhaps without 8K, but with more refined contrast and colours. Because 8K still remains a technology that looks firmly to the future and the QN990F shows what televisions of tomorrow could look like. But are we – the viewers – already ready to pay such a high price for this vision and accept the compromises that come with it?

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it’s really just the price. This is a model that is primarily meant to be cheap, and it accomplishes that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget model at 60 Hz", Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which, when connected to a console, really improves the experience and makes everything quite responsive. But... there’s the catch. The biggest issue with this television is its brightness, or rather the lack of it. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and unclear, despite having a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is essentially just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary punch, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically lag behind other cheap screens. The question is whether you will get along with the Titan OS system, which is currently a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard at the competition. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs aplenty, the Philips PUS7000 is in for a really tough battle. If you value a known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Average
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1344 (28 x 48)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

89,250:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

28,200:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

12,100:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,050:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

QN990F is the highest representative of the Neo QLED series, so it must include Mini-LED technology. The 65-inch model we tested features a VA panel and an impressive 1344 local dimming zones, which already looks really impressive on paper. In practice, this can achieve a contrast effect close to ideal. In less demanding scenes, such as in the film Oblivion, the QN990F performed on par with OLED televisions – the blacks were virtually infinite, and the picture looked stunning. However, it wasn't always so rosy. Or perhaps black and white? Like every Mini-LED, the QN990F has its limitations, and in more challenging sequences, it can leave mixed impressions. In areas where a huge amount of fine detail appears on the screen, the algorithms controlling the zones simply get confused. The contrast dropped, and a noticeable halo effect appeared around bright elements. Additionally, in films recorded in the 21:9 (2.35:1) format, we noticed that the QN990F was unable to perfectly dim the truly black letterbox bars, leaving a silver/blue glow on them. One could say that Samsung in this model focused more on detail visibility than on achieving perfect black depth. On one hand, this yields very good results in several scenes, on the other – in a television of this class, we expected the local dimming feature to be even better refined. The final effect is simply "okay," and at this price point, we would expect something more than a satisfactory outcome.

The model PUS7000 tested by us in the size of 55 inches has been equipped with a VA panel. This is of great importance for the quality of black, as in such budget constructions we will not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. All the work thus rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at the level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewing than in the case of competing televisions with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, which means that dark parts of the image do not appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. It is worth adding, however, that with the lights completely off, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it is advisable to consider watching the television with light, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips televisions, which optically increases contrast through a glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we will not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series, such as the PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

6.6/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.1%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

802 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

689 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

1076 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

735 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

Samsung QN990F

The Samsung QN990F belongs to the bright televisions category, and this is immediately evident in tests. In measurements, it achieved around 1300 nits, which in practice allows for enjoying films as their creators intended. Bright scenes have the right intensity, lights shine, and the experience is truly cinematic. In standard test patterns, sequences number 1, 3, and 5 performed best – there, brightness maintained around 800-1000 nits, and the image looked very natural. In more challenging segments, it could drop to around 600 nits, but even so, the level remained sufficient for details to be clearly visible. However, it should be added that in highly contrasting shots, the halo effect returns – the same one we mentioned regarding black levels. Bright elements can leave a halo on dark backgrounds, and this stands out immediately. Since we are dealing with a QLED, the colour palette is expanded, and the colours appear striking. The problem is that with such a flagship model, we expected better numbers. 91% DCI-P3 coverage and about 67% BT.2020 are results that can be considered solid, but not outstanding. This gives a vibrant and appealing image, yet the competition in this and lower price tiers can showcase even more.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. The screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to properly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it is better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as discussed below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers enhancing colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN990F in Filmmaker mode, which is the best available right out of the box. Right from the start, we noticed several significant errors. The biggest issue concerned white balance. Due to too little blue, and also improper ratios between red and blue, the image – especially in scenes with a lot of white – appeared too yellow, and at times even orange. On the Color Checker palette, these errors didn't look dramatic as they hovered around a value of 4, but in everyday viewing, especially with strong whites, they were most noticeable. We also observed issues with brightness management – the television struggled to maintain detail in the smallest parts of the image, mainly due to the way it controls the backlighting zones. Fortunately, Samsung offers a lot of room for adjustment when it comes to calibration settings. We know that with the right calibration, much more can be extracted from this screen.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw came to light. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and overly low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one may get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find quite a few functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After completing the calibration, we managed to bring the white balance back to order and eliminate the previous shortcomings in the shades of blue. As a result, the image no longer looked as if it had a slightly yellowish filter applied – the whites are purer, and the overall presentation is much more natural. We also managed, to some extent, to tame the brightness characteristics in HDR content. The television now handles detail retention in blacks significantly better and does not lose them to the same degree as before. However, when we look at the EOTF curve and the way the QN990F reproduces brightness in films, it is evident that it still tends to accentuate details in dark areas more strongly. This is a characteristic feature of Mini-LED technology and, more specifically, the way it is managed by the QN990F, which is practically impossible to completely eliminate. Despite this, after calibration, the image appears much more natural, mainly due to the correct exposure of white light. The final effect is definitely more pleasant to perceive and closer to what we expect from a flagship television.

After professional calibration, it is evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not at all a given. The effects should be evaluated in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the picture looks really good. Most colour errors have fallen below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions usually begin to be visible to the naked eye in measurements. Films, series, sports, and regular television look natural, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be clearly stated that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for reasonable HDR, and calibration changes very little in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: the colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions to expand the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most apparent in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.2/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of fluidity in tonal transitions, the QN990F demonstrates class. It's one of the best results we've seen so far. In most scenes, there is no question of visible colour banding or typical stepping – transitions are smooth and natural, and the image appears incredibly coherent. Of course, as with virtually any television, in very dark scenes, some issues with gradation can be spotted. Banding can be noticeable there, but this is a typical phenomenon and should not affect the assessment of the QN990F itself. Against the competition, it looks truly very good, and the viewing experience is simply excellent, with the assurance that nothing will distract us from the image.

In terms of colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It is hard to have any significant reservations here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means that on a bright background, there are no troubling bands or jumps between shades. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, at that point, quite strong 'stepping' of colours is visible. Instead of smooth transitions, we get clear cut-offs between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite irritating and distract from the film itself, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The biggest praise for the QN990F should be given for its upscaling. The processor responsible for "lifting" classic television to 8K resolution does quite well. While watching material in 576p signal, we had no illusions that we would suddenly see a miracle in advertising style, where the image magically transforms into crystal-clear 8K. Nevertheless, the end result was surprisingly good; the image looked clean and sharp. It’s just a shame that the television, like most Samsung models, has an overscan issue, slightly cropping the edges of the screen from the left side.

When it comes to image processing, Samsung offers a feature called "noise reduction," which in theory should improve tonal transitions in older materials, where they are usually more visible. Unfortunately, we felt quite disappointed here. The feature performs poorly – it does not handle unwanted stripes and can introduce its own artifacts. On the plus side, the television does not remove film grain when using this feature, but in practice, that is a poor consolation since the noise reduction itself proves to be virtually useless.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at low settings. However, it has a drawback: if applied too aggressively, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. Therefore, it would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find a happy medium between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower-resolution materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for nearly all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If it feels too soft for someone, the sharpness slider in the menu can always be adjusted to achieve a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
240Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
76%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K@240Hz):

Blur ():

QN990F can comfortably be called one of the fastest televisions in the world. In 4K mode, it is capable of displaying images at a frequency of up to 240 Hz, which until now has been more associated with gaming monitors than with televisions in the living room. However, in everyday viewing, what matters more is how it handles the 8K signal at 120 Hz – and here it performs very well too. Motion remains smooth, and the television manages without a hitch even with the most demanding content. Additionally, there is the motion smoother, i.e. "Picture Clarity". Thanks to it, one can adjust the image to their own preferences – leaving a slightly cinematic judder or switching to maximum fluidity, which works exceptionally well, for example, in sports broadcasts.

In this respect, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that is actually the norm, and it is hard to expect anything more. However, the worst part is that the television does not have any features to improve motion smoothness. There is a lack of any supporting systems, both in films and in sports. We must come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw". This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion can appear choppy or unclear. We do not have the option to enable any smoothers that would reduce this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It must be said outright – the QN990F is one of those televisions that practically scream that they were designed with gamers in mind. Samsung has been developing its gaming solutions for years, but here we have a truly comprehensive set. Sure, it lacks Dolby Vision support in games, which is a downside that will always come up in discussions. However, aside from that, the list of features is impressively extensive. To begin with, we have the Game Bar – a handy menu that allows you to quickly check and change gaming-related settings. You can see, for example, the enabled VRR, frame rate, or aspect ratio settings. It’s like a little “dashboard,” making it unnecessary to dig deep into the menu to make adjustments. Speaking of VRR: yes, variable refresh rate is present here and works flawlessly. And there's ALLM, which automatically switches the television to game mode as soon as the console is powered on. These may seem like small details, but together they make using the QN990F simply comfortable and hassle-free.

However, the most impressive aspect is the number of ports. Four wireless HDMI 2.1 ports are already great news, as there is no need to choose whether to connect the console, the amplifier, or perhaps even a PC. There’s ample space for everything here. And if we add another micro HDMI (which we recommend connecting directly to the console), hidden in the casing, we practically have five inputs in full 2.1 standard. Let’s also add support for high refresh rates – 120 Hz at 8K and even 240 Hz at 4K – and we get a television that not only keeps up with the new consoles but also feels ready for consoles that are not yet available.

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming television, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While it is true that we won’t find support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has ensured several important features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience on consoles. The most important of these are the VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from tearing and keeps it consistent even during sudden drops in frame rate while gaming. In contrast, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the television to the lowest latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be summoned on screen at any time. It allows for a quick preview of the current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
12 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120
10 ms
4320p60
17 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

If we look at the table with the input lag results, the QN990F performs phenomenally – within 10–15 ms, which is practically at the level of gaming monitors. However, there are a few "buts." First and foremost, the measurements taken on the additional micro HDMI, which Samsung cleverly hid in the television's casing, show the full capabilities. At that point, the image responds instantaneously and gaming is pure pleasure. The problem starts when we connect the console to the wireless One Connect module. Here, the input lag jumps – the measuring device showed values higher by even 20 ms for the first 1–2 seconds before the delays stabilised at around 40 ms. This is a level that can be felt in faster games. Interestingly, the module was positioned next to it, at a distance of 2–3 meters, so the signal did not have any difficult conditions. It's not hard to imagine that if we hide it, for example, behind a sofa at a distance of 6–10 meters, the input lag could exceed even 100-150 ms. And those are values that are already completely unacceptable for gaming.

The input lag measurements for Wireless One Connect from a distance of 2-3m are as follows:

SDR

Input lag

HDR

Input lag

1080p60

39 ms

1080p120

25 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p120

26 ms

2160p120

26 ms

4320p60

43 ms

4320p60

43 ms

Another advantage for gamers is the very low input lag of around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so small that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's difficult to notice at all. Playing remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with significantly more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

7.9/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
10ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
240Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN990F can impress when we connect a computer to it for gaming. The panel, with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz, support for G-Sync, and a really decent input lag, makes the television function like a giant gaming monitor. For gaming, this is a dream set-up, and the responsiveness is at a level that is virtually unheard of in regular televisions.

Unfortunately, the situation is significantly poorer when it comes to ordinary PC work. It's a shame because the 8K resolution theoretically has immense potential – you can even place a 65-inch screen on your desk and sit close to it, benefiting from the enormous pixel density. However, in practice, the magic dissipates. Despite proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, which should guarantee sharp fonts, the readability on the QN990F is not ideal. The letters have slight edge issues, and longer work with text simply isn't comfortable. It's a pity, as gamers have a lot to offer here, and the capabilities in games are excellent. However, this television is rather unsuitable for everyday office work.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming possibilities are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles chroma subsampling 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble rendering fonts cleanly.

Viewing angles

6.5/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
57%
70%

Samsung has employed a coating in the QN990F that widens the viewing angles, and it does indeed fulfill its purpose. We have the impression that this year it works a bit less effectively than in last year’s models, but nonetheless, the effect is still impressive. For a VA panel, the angles are really very good – to the extent that they can be compared to what is offered by televisions with IPS panels. This means that even when watching from the side, we do not noticeably lose either contrast or colours.

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which is directly due to the use of a VA type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just a slight shift to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image to become noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

5.2/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

Samsung QN990F: 363 cd/m2

One of the biggest innovations in this year's Neo QLED 8K TVs is the matte screens. Yes, you read that correctly – Samsung has applied a matte finish to its flagship model, and we must admit that the effect is truly impressive. Reflections practically disappear, the screen doesn't turn into a mirror, and watching in a bright living room suddenly becomes much more enjoyable. Of course, there’s no rose without thorns. The matte finish makes blacks appear a bit faded during the day, and colours lose some of their richness. It’s a compromise – either we battle reflections or we retain maximum colour depth.

When it comes to brightness, the QN990F is not a record breaker. In TV mode, it achieves around 370–400 nits, which is fine for everyday television viewing, but may prove insufficient in very bright, sunlit rooms to completely "pierce" through the incoming light.

In a sunlit room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all due to the fact that the panel is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin coating of the screen does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not so prominent on the panel, but it is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be rather unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
T-RSPFDEUC-0090-1050.6 E2500007, BT-S
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

Samsung QN990F

Philips PUS7000

TV features

7.5/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

Classic Features and Connections

Although the QN990F looks like a television from the future, if someone simply wants to watch regular television – it can be done, and quite comfortably too. It comes with several practical additions, such as PiP, which allows for watching two sources simultaneously. Mentioning Bluetooth is hardly necessary, as it has become a standard. However, particular attention should be given to the whole idea of wireless operation. The One Connect module can be placed in a different location than the television itself, which is a significant convenience for those who frequently switch devices. Of course, it still needs to be plugged in, so it's not completely cable-free, but it's hard not to view this as a demonstration of Samsung's capabilities – a glimpse of how televisions of the future might look.

Smart TV System: Tizen

When it comes to the operating system, Samsung has opted for its proprietary Tizen, which, despite being a closed ecosystem, operates extremely smoothly. It is one of the fastest, if not the fastest, operating systems in televisions, and it is also very intuitive. All the classic smart features are present: AirPlay, screen mirroring, voice search in multiple languages, and quick access to the most important streaming applications. While a few niche programmes may be missing, the vast majority of users will find everything they need here.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still quite a new operating system and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. Everything functions sluggishly and at times, clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth/RF. This means that we need to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we still could not activate the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting images from Apple devices using the AirPlay function went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very limited application library. The selection is significantly smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programmes is nearly unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 could be a good choice for those who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic programme guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which makes it much easier to operate after dark, and has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting feature is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home cinema systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Apps

9.3/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

QN990F handles playback of files from USB practically flawlessly. Films, music, photos – most popular formats work without the slightest problems and there is no need to fiddle with additional players or devices. It is only with rarely encountered photo formats that limitations may arise. It is a pity that despite the manufacturer's declarations, there is a lack of proper support for HEIC files. The television sees them in the media browser, but in practice, it cannot open them.

The built-in media player works quite efficiently and handles most popular video formats without significant issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a hard drive or USB stick should not feel constrained. The only drawback concerns the photo browser - not everything functioned correctly, and some files, especially at selected resolutions, did not open at all.

Sound

7.9/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

QN990F can play really pleasantly. Considering such a slim design, the sound is surprisingly clear and detailed, so one can be satisfied for everyday movie watching or gaming. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung's ultra-thin TVs, there is a lack of bass – and you can feel it immediately. Action scenes or stronger effects do not have the depth that a decent soundbar or home theatre system would provide. On the positive side, however, it deserves credit for supporting Dolby Atmos. This is currently the most popular spatial audio codec in films and gives a much greater sense of immersion in the action. Unfortunately, as always with Samsung, support for DTS:X is missing. This format is indeed appearing less frequently in new productions, but it is still valued by fans of physical Blu-ray media.

The sound quality is distinctly budget-level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programmes, but when it comes to films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. It's hard to expect anything more at this price, so if better experiences are important to us, it's worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even via the headphone output.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC