Samsung QN990F vs Philips OLED950

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA (wide viewing angle)

Resolution: 7680x4320

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    8.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.7

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.6

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.2

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.9

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    5.2

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    7.5

    6.5

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    8.2

Advantages

  • Amazing Design

  • Wireless module Wiraless One Connect

  • Excellent black

  • High brightness

  • Matte display very effectively reduces reflections

  • Good viewing angles

  • The fastest TV in the world - refresh rate 4K@240Hz and 8K@120Hz excellent for sports

  • Many features for gamers: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Gamebar

  • Very fast and intuitive operating system Tizen OS

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test screens (Tandem OLED panel)

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent gaming features: support for 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of apps

  • Backlit remote, charged via USB-C connector

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very high price

  • Local dimming algorithms could be improved

  • Lack of Dolby Vision and DTS:X

  • High input lag when wirelessly connected to Wiraless One Connect

  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterisation

Our verdict

The Samsung QN990F is a television that makes a huge impression from the very first moment. It's probably one of the most attractive models on the market – ultra-slim, with an almost invisible frame and a base that gives the impression that the screen is levitating above the table. In addition, there's the futuristic Wiraless One Connect module, this time in a wireless version, which helps to reduce the number of cables in the living room and adds a modern character to the whole setup. But it doesn't end with the design. The QN990F also boasts powerful specifications. The Mini-LED with over a thousand dimming zones can generate contrast that at times rivals OLEDs. "Additionally, there is very high HDR brightness and a new matte panel that effectively eliminates reflections. And when we add great motion fluidity with a refresh rate reaching up to 240 Hz in 4K, we have a set of features that truly impress. Samsung hasn't forgotten about gamers either – we have Game Bar, VRR, ALLM, as well as five HDMI 2.1 ports and phenomenal input lag of 10–15 ms (when connected via micro HDMI).

And this is where we get to the crux of the matter. Because while the QN990F impresses on paper and in many tests, in practice some solutions still require refinement. The wireless One Connect module raises the input lag to unacceptable levels for gamers, the Mini-LED can struggle in difficult scenes with a lot of detail, and the lack of Dolby Vision or DTS:X serves as a reminder that Samsung is stubbornly forging its own path, sometimes at the expense of the user. Despite this, the QN990F is a television that indicates the direction of industry development. It is not a model for everyone – but for those who love gadgets, technological innovations, and want a screen in their living room that looks like it came from the future. However, if someone is looking exclusively for the best picture quality, even in Samsung's portfolio there are models that perform significantly better – perhaps without 8K, but with more refined contrast and colours. Because 8K still remains a technology that looks firmly to the future and the QN990F shows what televisions of tomorrow could look like. But are we – the viewers – already ready to pay such a high price for this vision and accept the compromises that come with it?

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines in many ways what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel means we are at an absolute peak in terms of picture quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode creates effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we are watching films in a sunlit living room or gaming at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel mingles with a certain feeling of inadequacy when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions or posterisation in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we were hoping for a significantly greater quality leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness thus becomes the biggest problem of this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not even about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant picture generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins in the audio department, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the pricier 950 model in favour of a different design. We thus face a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we must pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1344 (28 x 48)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

89,250:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

28,200:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

12,100:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,050:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

QN990F is the highest representative of the Neo QLED series, so it must include Mini-LED technology. The 65-inch model we tested features a VA panel and an impressive 1344 local dimming zones, which already looks really impressive on paper. In practice, this can achieve a contrast effect close to ideal. In less demanding scenes, such as in the film Oblivion, the QN990F performed on par with OLED televisions – the blacks were virtually infinite, and the picture looked stunning. However, it wasn't always so rosy. Or perhaps black and white? Like every Mini-LED, the QN990F has its limitations, and in more challenging sequences, it can leave mixed impressions. In areas where a huge amount of fine detail appears on the screen, the algorithms controlling the zones simply get confused. The contrast dropped, and a noticeable halo effect appeared around bright elements. Additionally, in films recorded in the 21:9 (2.35:1) format, we noticed that the QN990F was unable to perfectly dim the truly black letterbox bars, leaving a silver/blue glow on them. One could say that Samsung in this model focused more on detail visibility than on achieving perfect black depth. On one hand, this yields very good results in several scenes, on the other – in a television of this class, we expected the local dimming feature to be even better refined. The final effect is simply "okay," and at this price point, we would expect something more than a satisfactory outcome.

There is not much to elaborate on here. As with every OLED television, the black and contrast quality in the Philips OLED950 is simply perfect. Regardless of the film scene being watched, night shots, or materials in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without any halos or brightening. This is one of the greatest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED televisions. There is no game of local dimming algorithms or compromises here. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a feature of our test sample, more related to the character of image reproduction than to the black quality itself. In this regard, everything here is at the highest level.

HDR effect quality

6.6/10

8.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.1%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

802 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

689 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

1076 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

735 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED950

Samsung QN990F

Luminance of RGB colors

The Samsung QN990F belongs to the bright televisions category, and this is immediately evident in tests. In measurements, it achieved around 1300 nits, which in practice allows for enjoying films as their creators intended. Bright scenes have the right intensity, lights shine, and the experience is truly cinematic. In standard test patterns, sequences number 1, 3, and 5 performed best – there, brightness maintained around 800-1000 nits, and the image looked very natural. In more challenging segments, it could drop to around 600 nits, but even so, the level remained sufficient for details to be clearly visible. However, it should be added that in highly contrasting shots, the halo effect returns – the same one we mentioned regarding black levels. Bright elements can leave a halo on dark backgrounds, and this stands out immediately. Since we are dealing with a QLED, the colour palette is expanded, and the colours appear striking. The problem is that with such a flagship model, we expected better numbers. 91% DCI-P3 coverage and about 67% BT.2020 are results that can be considered solid, but not outstanding. This gives a vibrant and appealing image, yet the competition in this and lower price tiers can showcase even more.

The OLED950 is a phenomenal television for consuming content in HDR format, primarily thanks to the innovative Tandem OLED panel. With this technology, the screen can generate astronomical brightness levels, reaching over 2000 nits in film scenes (on test patterns). This is an exceptional result that places the OLED950 among the world’s top displays available on the market. However, it is important to note a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, brightness can drop by as much as half. It is worth emphasising, though, that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for the HDR image to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of bright scenes.

The use of the Tandem OLED panel has also brought tangible benefits in terms of colour reproduction, improving elements that traditional WOLED panels struggled with compared to their QD-OLED competition. For the OLED950, the colour gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 colour space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high standards of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world use. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colours look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

5.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN990F in Filmmaker mode, which is the best available right out of the box. Right from the start, we noticed several significant errors. The biggest issue concerned white balance. Due to too little blue, and also improper ratios between red and blue, the image – especially in scenes with a lot of white – appeared too yellow, and at times even orange. On the Color Checker palette, these errors didn't look dramatic as they hovered around a value of 4, but in everyday viewing, especially with strong whites, they were most noticeable. We also observed issues with brightness management – the television struggled to maintain detail in the smallest parts of the image, mainly due to the way it controls the backlighting zones. Fortunately, Samsung offers a lot of room for adjustment when it comes to calibration settings. We know that with the right calibration, much more can be extracted from this screen.

We tested the OLED950 model in Film mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice it proved not to be free from flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge was not the white balance itself – although it did show a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish hue. The main issue lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. The analysis of the gamma graph and the EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively exposes brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology allows. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, which is why – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

9.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After completing the calibration, we managed to bring the white balance back to order and eliminate the previous shortcomings in the shades of blue. As a result, the image no longer looked as if it had a slightly yellowish filter applied – the whites are purer, and the overall presentation is much more natural. We also managed, to some extent, to tame the brightness characteristics in HDR content. The television now handles detail retention in blacks significantly better and does not lose them to the same degree as before. However, when we look at the EOTF curve and the way the QN990F reproduces brightness in films, it is evident that it still tends to accentuate details in dark areas more strongly. This is a characteristic feature of Mini-LED technology and, more specifically, the way it is managed by the QN990F, which is practically impossible to completely eliminate. Despite this, after calibration, the image appears much more natural, mainly due to the correct exposure of white light. The final effect is definitely more pleasant to perceive and closer to what we expect from a flagship television.

As can be seen, the OLED950, after a professional calibration process, transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display that, without a shadow of a doubt, can be placed alongside the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in the Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the colour palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering image quality of the highest order.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.2/10

7.1/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of fluidity in tonal transitions, the QN990F demonstrates class. It's one of the best results we've seen so far. In most scenes, there is no question of visible colour banding or typical stepping – transitions are smooth and natural, and the image appears incredibly coherent. Of course, as with virtually any television, in very dark scenes, some issues with gradation can be spotted. Banding can be noticeable there, but this is a typical phenomenon and should not affect the assessment of the QN990F itself. Against the competition, it looks truly very good, and the viewing experience is simply excellent, with the assurance that nothing will distract us from the image.

If we were to point out the weaker aspect of the OLED950 model in comparison to market competitors like the G5 and S95F, it would be the digital signal processing – just like with most televisions from this manufacturer. Although the processor used here is termed “dual,” our practical tests did not reveal significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are, in fact, symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, particularly dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterisation. However, it must be clearly stated that this is a “flaw” that the average viewer will very rarely notice during normal usage, and the overall perception remains at a high level.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The biggest praise for the QN990F should be given for its upscaling. The processor responsible for "lifting" classic television to 8K resolution does quite well. While watching material in 576p signal, we had no illusions that we would suddenly see a miracle in advertising style, where the image magically transforms into crystal-clear 8K. Nevertheless, the end result was surprisingly good; the image looked clean and sharp. It’s just a shame that the television, like most Samsung models, has an overscan issue, slightly cropping the edges of the screen from the left side.

When it comes to image processing, Samsung offers a feature called "noise reduction," which in theory should improve tonal transitions in older materials, where they are usually more visible. Unfortunately, we felt quite disappointed here. The feature performs poorly – it does not handle unwanted stripes and can introduce its own artifacts. On the plus side, the television does not remove film grain when using this feature, but in practice, that is a poor consolation since the noise reduction itself proves to be virtually useless.

Upscaling

In terms of the image upscaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Low-resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. This kind of presentation will certainly appeal to many people. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can lightly enhance them with the appropriate slider in the television's menu. It's really hard to find fault in this aspect. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no issue with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The function for smoothing tonal transitions performs somewhat worse. In the settings, we find an option called "Distortion Reduction." This allows for three levels of adjustment of the processor's interference. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out actors' skin details. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It definitely removes too much detail from the faces and background elements, and can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth experimenting with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preference. It may seem that the Medium option is the best compromise here.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
240Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
76%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K@240Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

QN990F can comfortably be called one of the fastest televisions in the world. In 4K mode, it is capable of displaying images at a frequency of up to 240 Hz, which until now has been more associated with gaming monitors than with televisions in the living room. However, in everyday viewing, what matters more is how it handles the 8K signal at 120 Hz – and here it performs very well too. Motion remains smooth, and the television manages without a hitch even with the most demanding content. Additionally, there is the motion smoother, i.e. "Picture Clarity". Thanks to it, one can adjust the image to their own preferences – leaving a slightly cinematic judder or switching to maximum fluidity, which works exceptionally well, for example, in sports broadcasts.

The motion reproduction in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the panel shows no blurring at all. This allows us to enjoy perfect sharpness in practically any conditions. Much of this is thanks not only to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It must be said outright – the QN990F is one of those televisions that practically scream that they were designed with gamers in mind. Samsung has been developing its gaming solutions for years, but here we have a truly comprehensive set. Sure, it lacks Dolby Vision support in games, which is a downside that will always come up in discussions. However, aside from that, the list of features is impressively extensive. To begin with, we have the Game Bar – a handy menu that allows you to quickly check and change gaming-related settings. You can see, for example, the enabled VRR, frame rate, or aspect ratio settings. It’s like a little “dashboard,” making it unnecessary to dig deep into the menu to make adjustments. Speaking of VRR: yes, variable refresh rate is present here and works flawlessly. And there's ALLM, which automatically switches the television to game mode as soon as the console is powered on. These may seem like small details, but together they make using the QN990F simply comfortable and hassle-free.

However, the most impressive aspect is the number of ports. Four wireless HDMI 2.1 ports are already great news, as there is no need to choose whether to connect the console, the amplifier, or perhaps even a PC. There’s ample space for everything here. And if we add another micro HDMI (which we recommend connecting directly to the console), hidden in the casing, we practically have five inputs in full 2.1 standard. Let’s also add support for high refresh rates – 120 Hz at 8K and even 240 Hz at 4K – and we get a television that not only keeps up with the new consoles but also feels ready for consoles that are not yet available.

The OLED950 is nearly the perfect television for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere created by the Ambilight system during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the robust hardware support. You will find literally everything you should expect from a modern gaming display. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the automatic ALLM game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal without difficulty, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most visually appealing on the market, it fully accomplishes its purpose. It displays all the important signal parameters and offers useful extras. Gamers can take advantage of the minimap zoom feature or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. The contrast range adjustment also proves to be useful, as it allows you to brighten shadows and gain better visibility of enemies hidden in dark corners of the map.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
12 ms
1080p120
9 ms
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms
5 ms
4320p60
17 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

If we look at the table with the input lag results, the QN990F performs phenomenally – within 10–15 ms, which is practically at the level of gaming monitors. However, there are a few "buts." First and foremost, the measurements taken on the additional micro HDMI, which Samsung cleverly hid in the television's casing, show the full capabilities. At that point, the image responds instantaneously and gaming is pure pleasure. The problem starts when we connect the console to the wireless One Connect module. Here, the input lag jumps – the measuring device showed values higher by even 20 ms for the first 1–2 seconds before the delays stabilised at around 40 ms. This is a level that can be felt in faster games. Interestingly, the module was positioned next to it, at a distance of 2–3 meters, so the signal did not have any difficult conditions. It's not hard to imagine that if we hide it, for example, behind a sofa at a distance of 6–10 meters, the input lag could exceed even 100-150 ms. And those are values that are already completely unacceptable for gaming.

The input lag measurements for Wireless One Connect from a distance of 2-3m are as follows:

SDR

Input lag

HDR

Input lag

1080p60

39 ms

1080p120

25 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p120

26 ms

2160p120

26 ms

4320p60

43 ms

4320p60

43 ms

As we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated almost reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via the controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

Compatibility with PC

7.9/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Average
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
10ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BWRG
Max refresh rate
240Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN990F can impress when we connect a computer to it for gaming. The panel, with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz, support for G-Sync, and a really decent input lag, makes the television function like a giant gaming monitor. For gaming, this is a dream set-up, and the responsiveness is at a level that is virtually unheard of in regular televisions.

Unfortunately, the situation is significantly poorer when it comes to ordinary PC work. It's a shame because the 8K resolution theoretically has immense potential – you can even place a 65-inch screen on your desk and sit close to it, benefiting from the enormous pixel density. However, in practice, the magic dissipates. Despite proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, which should guarantee sharp fonts, the readability on the QN990F is not ideal. The letters have slight edge issues, and longer work with text simply isn't comfortable. It's a pity, as gamers have a lot to offer here, and the capabilities in games are excellent. However, this television is rather unsuitable for everyday office work.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It performs excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. Here we have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low input lag. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we look at the readability of the fonts. We are not just referring to the unusual subpixel arrangement of WOLED panels (BWRG), which causes a specific colouration of the text edges in all TVs of this type. The tested model has trouble properly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colourful text on another colourful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artefacts. It's a bit of a shame, although we must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as an office monitor, you may feel disappointed.

Viewing angles

6.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
57%
29%

Samsung has employed a coating in the QN990F that widens the viewing angles, and it does indeed fulfill its purpose. We have the impression that this year it works a bit less effectively than in last year’s models, but nonetheless, the effect is still impressive. For a VA panel, the angles are really very good – to the extent that they can be compared to what is offered by televisions with IPS panels. This means that even when watching from the side, we do not noticeably lose either contrast or colours.

As is fitting for organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where on the sofa we are looking at the screen. The only reservation arises when directly comparing the Tandem OLED matrix used here with the competition's solutions. In comparison with last year's LG panels equipped with MLA filters or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they generally still maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it is hard to consider this a disadvantage.

Daytime performance

5.2/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Matte
Glare
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

Samsung QN990F: 363 cd/m2

One of the biggest innovations in this year's Neo QLED 8K TVs is the matte screens. Yes, you read that correctly – Samsung has applied a matte finish to its flagship model, and we must admit that the effect is truly impressive. Reflections practically disappear, the screen doesn't turn into a mirror, and watching in a bright living room suddenly becomes much more enjoyable. Of course, there’s no rose without thorns. The matte finish makes blacks appear a bit faded during the day, and colours lose some of their richness. It’s a compromise – either we battle reflections or we retain maximum colour depth.

When it comes to brightness, the QN990F is not a record breaker. In TV mode, it achieves around 370–400 nits, which is fine for everyday television viewing, but may prove insufficient in very bright, sunlit rooms to completely "pierce" through the incoming light.

The OLED950 model will perform well in very bright rooms without any concerns. A key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. The performance is impressive for OLED technology. It can confidently be stated that in this respect, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant advantage of the tested device.

However, there is a certain drawback that can be described as a Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has applied a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It is worth bearing this in mind when planning the position of the television in relation to windows, as reflections may be noticeable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
T-RSPFDEUC-0090-1050.6 E2500007, BT-S
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details

TV features

7.5/10

6.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features

Classic Features and Connections

Although the QN990F looks like a television from the future, if someone simply wants to watch regular television – it can be done, and quite comfortably too. It comes with several practical additions, such as PiP, which allows for watching two sources simultaneously. Mentioning Bluetooth is hardly necessary, as it has become a standard. However, particular attention should be given to the whole idea of wireless operation. The One Connect module can be placed in a different location than the television itself, which is a significant convenience for those who frequently switch devices. Of course, it still needs to be plugged in, so it's not completely cable-free, but it's hard not to view this as a demonstration of Samsung's capabilities – a glimpse of how televisions of the future might look.

Smart TV System: Tizen

When it comes to the operating system, Samsung has opted for its proprietary Tizen, which, despite being a closed ecosystem, operates extremely smoothly. It is one of the fastest, if not the fastest, operating systems in televisions, and it is also very intuitive. All the classic smart features are present: AirPlay, screen mirroring, voice search in multiple languages, and quick access to the most important streaming applications. While a few niche programmes may be missing, the vast majority of users will find everything they need here.

Smart Features

The biggest plus of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favour of TitanOS, but here we are fortunately still provided with a full Android-based environment. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, we have once again been unable to launch Windows Miracast in the editorial office, despite the manufacturer's claim that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics", the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most objections arise regarding the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed with backlighting, "hybrid" switching between typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charging via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly wanes when it turns out that you need to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

QN990F handles playback of files from USB practically flawlessly. Films, music, photos – most popular formats work without the slightest problems and there is no need to fiddle with additional players or devices. It is only with rarely encountered photo formats that limitations may arise. It is a pity that despite the manufacturer's declarations, there is a lack of proper support for HEIC files. The television sees them in the media browser, but in practice, it cannot open them.

The factory file player in the OLED950 model works simply brilliantly. During our tests, the device handled virtually every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks or photos, the television played them without issue. It is difficult to find weak points in the handling of the most popular standards. However, if someone still feels something is lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not solely dependent on default solutions. At any time, we can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This gives us the assurance that the television can handle literally any file from our home library.

Sound

7.9/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    85dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

QN990F can play really pleasantly. Considering such a slim design, the sound is surprisingly clear and detailed, so one can be satisfied for everyday movie watching or gaming. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung's ultra-thin TVs, there is a lack of bass – and you can feel it immediately. Action scenes or stronger effects do not have the depth that a decent soundbar or home theatre system would provide. On the positive side, however, it deserves credit for supporting Dolby Atmos. This is currently the most popular spatial audio codec in films and gives a much greater sense of immersion in the action. Unfortunately, as always with Samsung, support for DTS:X is missing. This format is indeed appearing less frequently in new productions, but it is still valued by fans of physical Blu-ray media.

The 2.1 speaker setup used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a really solid dose of proper sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the enclosure, the sound is deep and has a definite impact. This element is often missing in cheaper designs, where bass is virtually non-existent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That television, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you are big fans of Ambilight, and you deal with sound through an external home cinema or soundbar anyway.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video