Samsung QN900F vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

NeoQLED 8K / QN900F

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.8

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.3

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.3

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.4

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    9.1

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    7.1

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    8.2

    6.2

Advantages

  • Good black

  • Very high brightness - up to 2000 nits in HDR

  • Great motion smoothness - 4k@165hz with low motion blur

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, Game-bar, low input lag

  • Decent viewing angles

  • High usability efficiency in difficult lighting conditions: Matte screen + high brightness

  • Pleasant and very fast operating system: Tizen

  • Pleasant sound from built-in speakers

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS matrix)

  • Very low input lag (approx. 10-12 ms)

  • Fluid webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with pointer

  • Better colour gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp fonts, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colours after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient upscaling of older content

  • Noticeable low-end blend in sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • The algorithms for local dimming could have been better refined.

  • There is no recording support from the built-in tuners.

  • No DTS:X (home cinema).

  • Poor black level and low contrast

  • Low brightness (approximately 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Matrix refresh rate of only 60 Hz

  • USB player without support for HEIC files and very large images (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

The Samsung QN900F is a television that can make a tremendous impression. The greatest strength of this model is the combination of Mini-LED backlighting with a matte panel. This not only gives us decent blacks but, above all, incredible brightness and excellent readability in all conditions. During the day, in a brightly lit living room, it is probably the best-performing television in this year's Samsung offerings. Gamers will also find plenty to enjoy here – despite being an 8K screen, it can operate at a frequency of up to 165 Hz in 4K. Additionally, it comes with a full HDMI 2.1 package, VRR and ALLM features, and low input lag, so the QN900F is suitable for both next-generation consoles and PCs. The design also deserves great praise – when hung on the wall, with a thick metal frame, this model resembles a more luxurious version of the iconic The Frame. Combined with the matte panel and Art Store mode, it can indeed be treated as equipment that not only plays and lights up but also decorates the living room.

However, not everything is perfect. Despite its impressive specifications, local dimming management does not always perform as well as one might hope. Given the large number of zones, Samsung could refine its control over blacks and HDR effects – it is evident that the potential is immense, but it does not always translate into top-tier picture quality. Moreover, it is important to remember that 8K resolution is still more of a novelty than a genuine necessity, and the price of this model makes it easy to start looking for cheaper alternatives, including within Samsung's own offerings. Despite these reservations, the QN900F is a television that can undoubtedly impress. Its strength lies not in the 8K itself but in how it presents the image, how it looks, and the enjoyment it brings during use.

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed at all over the past few years. Apart from the new operating system, refreshed remote control, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design we have known for years. Thanks to the nanostructure filter, the television can display better, cleaner colours than standard budget televisions, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay for very poor blacks and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during night screenings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not just from brands like TCL or Hisense, but... from LG itself. The model we previously tested, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider colour gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model makes no sense – unless your priority is solely wide viewing angles, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for that (at the cost of tragic blacks and higher expenditure) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.2/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1056 (24 x 44)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

126,000:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

41,650:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

49,800:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,250:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The QN900F is equipped with a VA panel, which in itself provides decent contrast, but that is not where its greatest strength lies. This is a mini-LED television, so we are dealing with local dimming technology, allowing specific zones of the image to be darkened. In the 65-inch variant, we counted as many as 1056 zones, which translated into really solid results. In the best possible scenario, the QN900F achieved a contrast ratio exceeding 100,000:1, which is absolutely impressive – at that moment, the black level was truly reminiscent of OLED. However, it must be remembered that it is not an OLED and has its classic mini-LED quirks. Since the television must decide which zone to brighten and which to darken, there are moments when the algorithm is not entirely sure what to do. This was the case, for example, in one of our test scenes, where the QN900F chose brightness over black depth, resulting in a significant drop in contrast to a level of 2300:1. Yes, the elements on screen were brighter, but around them, a characteristic glow (halo effect) was visible – the black then resembled a navy blue more. Generally, the black level on the QN900F is really very good – but not so good as to compare it with televisions featuring an organic panel.

The NanoCell series, including the model NANO81 we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who is somewhat familiar with screen technology, this means one thing: significant problems with black levels and contrast. Our measurements are merciless in this regard. A result of 800:1 is, to put it bluntly, a tragic outcome. In practice, this means that what should appear on the screen as deep black looks like a dark grey patch at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will be downright torturous – the image will lose all its depth and appear flat. If you do decide on this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: do not watch it in complete darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it is best to leave a gentle light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install LED strips behind the television. Such backlighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grey on the screen seem a little darker. Nevertheless, the start of the test for cinematic experiences looks bleak.

HDR effect quality

6.4/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.6%, Bt.2020: 66.0%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

1200 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

609 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

850 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

214 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

1415 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Samsung QN900F

QN900F is truly a bright television – it can generate nearly 2000 nits, a figure that remains unattainable for most models available on the market. But the mere ability to achieve such brightness is not everything – it also matters whether the television can make good use of it. And here, it is not always perfect. Our tests on cinematic test patterns showed that in scenes such as those from Life of Pi or The Meg, the QN900F can truly shine – literally and metaphorically. In such moments, its greatest advantage, which is brightness, makes a huge impression. However, in more demanding scenes, challenges arise – similar to when assessing contrast. When smaller, bright elements appear on screen, the television often struggles with the decision: should it highlight them at the expense of black levels, or perhaps maintain deep blacks while toning down brightness. The result is situations where, for example, in the film Sicario 2, brightness dropped to just 200 nits, making details barely visible. Dimming algorithms could definitely be better for a television of this class.

If you are counting on HDR in the NANO81A to bring tears to your eyes, I must disappoint you. This television is simply too dark to truly show what this format is all about. With a brightness of only 250 nits, HDR exists here mainly on paper. In practice, during viewing, it is very difficult to distinguish whether we are watching high dynamic range content or regular SDR – it simply lacks that ‘punch’ of light in the bright parts of the image. However, to give credit where it’s due, we do have a glimmer of hope here – and quite a clear one at that. It concerns the colour gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it is not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. This is a really solid result that places this model significantly higher than typical budget options based on standard white LEDs without any filters. Of course, it still falls short of the level of quantum dot (QLED) TVs or advanced panels with PFS filters, but for this price point, the colours are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It's just a shame that this low brightness prevents them from fully ‘spreading their wings’ with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Testing the QN900F in Filmmaker mode, the characteristic features of the image were quickly noticeable, even though this mode is designed to reflect the director’s vision. The white balance was not perfect – the television displayed distinct deficiencies in the blue colour. This made the entire scene take on a warmer tone, as if someone had applied a subtle filter in shades of yellow and orange. In films where bright shots dominate – for example, scenes in the snow or in strong daylight – this gave the impression of slight warmth that did not always convey the director's intent. The second noticeable element was the management of brightness. The QN900F could sometimes brighten the image more than necessary. It looked as though the exposure had been slightly 'pulled up', causing the scene to lose its naturalness. Shadows were sometimes too shallow, and the contrast slightly weakened. These are not disqualifying errors, but for a television in this price range, it is evident that Filmmaker mode has not been perfected one hundred percent. This is particularly noticeable when we compare its image with what was seen after the screen calibration.

For every film fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. Its aim is to display images as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements". Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left something to be desired. The main issue turned out to be the white balance. Measurements showed a distinct deficiency of blue colour, which in practice meant that many scenes had a slightly yellowish, even "yellowed" tint. The white was not perfectly pure, which detracted from the freshness of the image. Additionally, brightness management was also not ideal – the factory-set gamma was too low. The picture often appeared oversaturated, as if overly lifted from the shadows, which caused it to lose naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price category, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration possibilities of this model are enormous, which is a big plus for those who enjoy "digging" in the menu. We decided to approach the topic in our own way and see how much we could squeeze out of this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.7/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we managed to eliminate errors in white balance and adjust them to a level that can be considered acceptable. It is not perfect, but it is definitely better than the factory settings. Most colour errors now lie within the deltaE 2–3 range, so in practice, they should not be noticeable during everyday viewing. However, the most significant improvement is evident in how the television manages brightness in SDR content. Shadows and details are no longer flattened, which gives the image depth and naturalness. As for 4K HDR material – colours themselves are no longer an issue, but some imperfections of Mini-LED technology can still be observed. The QN900F tends to dim the smallest bright elements too much, causing them to sometimes disappear from view. However, it should be noted that this is a much better solution than boosting the entire screen, which would spoil the contrast. This is more of a characteristic of this technology than a typical flaw, but it is worth keeping in mind. The effects of calibration are truly very good.

After calibration, the NANO81A is a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools even in such an affordable model deserves a big plus. We managed to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colours natural, vibrant, and simply "true". In SDR content (that is, regular television, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks worlds better – it is clear, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It is clear that this panel has significant potential, which is simply wasted by poor presets out of the box. However, we do have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it concerns brightness management in HDR mode. LG's algorithm in this model is constructed very conservatively. The television intentionally dims the HDR picture to avoid overexposing the already weak blacks of the IPS panel. The programmers faced a choice: either to provide more light and accept that the blacks would become light grey or to reduce the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Nevertheless, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is significantly better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.3/10

9.3/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

QN900F performs really very well in terms of gradation. The tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without clear contours or banding. Interestingly, it is one of the few televisions that handles dark transitions better than light ones – we only noticed slight imperfections in heavily brightened scenes like that from the film Kingsman. In most cases, the picture simply looks very good and we have nothing to complain about.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element in which the NANO81A truly shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically noted no occurrences of banding, that is, the annoying "steps" visible where one colour should transition smoothly into another. Everything appears incredibly natural and smooth. This is particularly evident in the bright scenes from the film Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artefacts. However, what is even more impressive is how the television handles the extremely difficult, dark, and misty shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and serve up ugly patches instead of smooth mist, the NANO81A holds its ground, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is the fact that with darker shades, you will notice more of the weak blacks of this television rather than any issues with colour blending.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

If we want to eliminate jarring tonal transitions that can be irritating, for example, while watching YouTube, we can use a feature called noise reduction. It works really effectively – it removes issues with colour blending when we set it to Standard level. However, as with most Samsung televisions, this does involve some compromises. Although we did not notice this feature significantly affecting the structure of objects in the image, it unfortunately reacts quite aggressively to film grain. Most people will likely appreciate this effect – the noise is simply removed – but if someone is looking for an image as close as possible to reference settings, we definitely recommend turning this option off.

When it comes to scaling, or dealing with very low-quality content, the QN900F performs really well. On the test card with the model, the image appeared clear, with only slight aliasing that shouldn't bother most viewers. However, it is worth mentioning one issue – the television sometimes has problems with so-called overscan, which can cause older content to be slightly cropped. This might manifest, for example, in subtitles disappearing from the bottom of the screen.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels mercilessly bring to light all the "dirt" and imperfections of lower-resolution content. However, with the LG NANO81A, the situation is quite different. This is truly a solid performer when it comes to handling content that is far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A significant advantage is the gradation reduction feature that you will find in the settings. It is extraordinarily effective in combating colour banding, which is a lifesaver when watching materials with a low bitrate, for instance, from some streaming services or older files from the web. However, it is worth maintaining a certain level of caution. Since we are dealing with a less powerful chip than in LG's top models, setting this option too aggressively may sometimes result in minor artefacts or slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimenting with this feature - in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
74%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Blur ():

There really is nothing to complain about here – the QN900F looks very good in terms of motion. With a 165 Hz panel in 4K, it can confidently be said that this television is suitable for both watching sports and gaming. The motion enhancer plays a key role here. It works brilliantly – not only during sports broadcasts, where it can eliminate blurring and image shaking, but also in games, where the animation becomes clearer and smoother. And of course, if someone likes to experiment with films – they also have that option. At lower settings, a slight graininess and cinematic character can be seen, while at higher settings, it takes on a soap opera effect. In other words, everyone can adjust the picture to their preferences, and the television has the power to handle it.

When it comes to motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a hard time. The television is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz. If you are looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast action games, you may feel a bit disappointed. With such a low native refresh rate, fast objects on the screen will always be a little blurred.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

It really is nice here. The QN900F offers a full set of features that we would expect from a top-end gaming television – we have VRR, ALLM, Game Bar, and also cloud gaming applications. However, the biggest standout is the proprietary motion smoother, which also works in games and – importantly – does not introduce noticeable lag. This is something we won't find with its other competitors. Unfortunately, there is also something concerning. This year, Samsung has evidently messed something up with its televisions. During the testing of the QN900F before its update, it had the HGIG feature, which allowed for perfect adjustment of HDR settings for the console. However, according to our procedures, we always update the equipment to the latest version – in order to give the manufacturer a chance to fix any shortcomings. And here… it turned out the opposite.After the update, the HGIG feature disappeared from the menu, making the correct configuration of the console for HDR practically impossible. It was supposed to be complete – 165Hz, four HDMI 2.1 ports, a full gaming package… but unfortunately, it turned out to be a small blunder. What a shame.

NANO81A is unfortunately not hardware designed for e-sports. The lack of support for a 120 Hz signal is a fact that users planning to purchase this model simply have to come to terms with. Nevertheless, LG's engineers have made an effort to maximise the potential of this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience. Firstly, the television supports VRR technology (within the range of 48-60 Hz) and ALLM. As a result, the image remains stable and does not "tear", and the device automatically switches to low-latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from a console. Managing these settings is extremely simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay, which allows for quick viewing of parameters without leaving the game. A very significant advantage is the support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles because it enables the television to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown-out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which is unfortunately a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
13 ms
1080p120
12 ms
2160p60
14 ms
12 ms
2160p120
11 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms
4320p60
18 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

In terms of input lag, the QN900F presents a class of its own. Regardless of the set resolution or refresh rate, the response time remains instantaneous. It's one of those televisions where it's genuinely difficult to perceive any delay. Gamers can rely on complete responsiveness and the assurance that every action from the controller will be immediately mirrored on the screen. In this category, it is simply the highest tier.

In terms of response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is around 12 ms. This result is at a very low level, which for a gamer means one thing – the delay between moving the stick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically imperceptible. The television excels in fast-paced titles, where every millisecond counts, and in this regard, it does not lag behind significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
18ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
165Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN900F is an 8K television, so even in a larger size, it can be treated as a legitimate work monitor – of course, provided that someone can actually fit such a colossus on their desk. The device supports 4:4:4 chroma, so overall font readability is good, though we noticed some issues with the thinnest lines. This may stem from the fact that at a native 8K resolution, some texts are simply so microscopic that the television is not necessarily ideally suited for it. It sounds a bit absurd, but how else can we explain it? 😉

On the other hand, the QN900F can be a great choice for PC gamers. It supports G-Sync technology, and at a 4K resolution, it offers refresh rates of up to 165 Hz. So if you have a very powerful computer, the QN900F will allow it to spread its wings and showcase its gaming prowess in all its glory.

Nano81A is truly a solid monitor for working with text. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper Chroma 4:4:4 implementation, fonts are very clear and sharp – practically everyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We noticed just one minor detail that we picked up with our laboratory meticulousness: the vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than the horizontal ones. However, this phenomenon is so minimal that we did not decide to deduct points for it. The scores only went down when it came to features typical for PC gamers – the lack of G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz will be a significant downside for those looking for a screen for dynamic computer games.

Viewing angles

5/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
66%

The viewing angles on the QN900F are really quite good, but we have the impression that the 'Ultra Viewing Angle' coating that Samsung heavily advertises performs worse than last year. Yes – the effect is still much better than in most LCD TVs with VA panels, but it still falls short of OLEDs or good IPS panels. The image holds up decently when viewed from the side, and the colours don't fade as quickly as in standard VAs, however, we expected something more, especially since previous generations from Samsung have performed better. Perhaps the additional matte coating that has appeared in this year's 8K series is having an effect on this.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the categories of black levels and contrast. Thanks to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles here are simply very good. It is in this section that the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality, even when viewed from a sharp angle. This makes the NANO81A a great option for those who have a wide furniture arrangement in their living room or often watch matches and films with larger groups.

Daytime performance

7.1/10

4/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

Samsung QN900F: 723 cd/m2

One of the innovations in 8K from Samsung is the matte display. This year, the Koreans have been gradually "mattifying" their televisions, and it must be said that the QN900F is at the very top of the game in this regard – reflections are suppressed better than in any other model on the market. In practice, this means that even in a brightly lit living room, the picture remains clear, and reflections nearly disappear from the screen. Of course, such a coating also comes at a cost. Colours lose some intensity, and black does not appear as deep under strong light as on shiny screens. But this is more of a detail than a real problem, as the richness of colours and depth of black are most important in the evening, with the lights turned off – and then this effect completely disappears.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness of around 250 nits, it is difficult to recommend it wholeheartedly for very bright, strongly sunlit living rooms – in such conditions, the picture will simply lack punch. Nevertheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin panel used here does a decent job of suppressing reflections. Thanks to this, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won’t see every detail of your surroundings reflected on the screen. So if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing is certainly possible, but this model simply wasn’t designed to "fight" full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
T-OSCPFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN900F TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN900F TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

Samsung QN900F

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

7.2/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features

Television Features

QN900F really has a lot to offer. In addition to standard connections and tuners, it also boasts many typical television features. There is teletext, a clear EPG, and even a PiP function, which is rare these days. The QN900F easily supports other devices using the solar remote included in the package, which somewhat compensates for the lack of recording from the built-in antenna tuners.

Smart TV

When it comes to smart features, Samsung, as always, provides plenty – there is a vast number of applications (though not all), and the Tizen on the QN900F ran very smoothly. It is also hard to find a better television for connecting external devices – AirPlay, Miracast, Chromecast – everything works flawlessly. A curiosity is the Art Gallery mode, which - similar to The Frame - allows you to display artworks on the turned-off screen. Thanks to its relatively thick, robust frame, the effect is quite impressive – on the wall, it looks like a digital painting and can certainly make an impression on someone. Therefore, the QN900F can be whimsically dubbed The Frame Super Extra Pro 😉

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the biggest advantages of the NANO81A model is its "brain", which is the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025 here, which in terms of fluidity and user experience is on par with the more expensive models of this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating through the menu is pure pleasure – there are no annoying stutters, which often occur with budget competitors. All of this is thanks to the unique remote with a pointer function (cursor), which has undergone a visual makeover this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism – the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It fits perfectly in the hand, but this change also has a downside. The physical numeric keypad has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will be no problem at all. However, older household members, attached to entering channel numbers by heart, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of functions that we would call "classic", the NANO81A sticks to a tried-and-true standard. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but in everyday television tasks, it performs flawlessly. The handling of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including even the old faithful Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connection of a game controller or wireless headphones and speakers. It is simply a television that "works" – it is stable, predictable, and does not cause unnecessary complications during daily use.

Apps

9.3/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the QN900F works really well. During testing, we did not notice any major problems with handling various audio and video formats – you can verify this yourself in our file listing. The only puzzling issue arose with subtitles – only those saved in .txt format worked for us, despite Samsung's information that the television should support significantly more extensions. What could be the reason for this? It's hard to say. It is possible that this is just a temporary bug that will be fixed in one of the upcoming updates.

Many users still use their own USB drives to display movies or photos on a large screen. In this regard, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most film libraries will work "straight out of the box". However, one must bear in mind the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are limited to what the manufacturer has prepared for us. There is no possibility to install alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player cannot handle something, not much can be done about it. During testing, we encountered a few specific limitations. Firstly, support for HEIC files is lacking. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from a USB drive, the television simply won't see them – it's worth changing the file format to JPG on the phone immediately. We also noticed that the player has difficulties processing very large image files. Photos with a resolution of 20–28 Mpix may fail to load or cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, everyday multimedia handling is smooth.

Sound

8.2/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The QN900F performs really well – as befits a premium television. The bass is quite strong, but slightly muted. We wouldn't compare it to top audio systems, but for built-in speakers, it does the job. The high tones are also a plus – quite clear and distinct, which is particularly useful when watching films with a lot of dialogue. Unfortunately, Samsung still does not support the DTS:X format in its televisions. This means that if we want to hear sound recorded in this standard, we need to connect an external home cinema through an amplifier – the television simply won't play it on its own.

In terms of audio, the LG NANO81A pleasantly surprises compared to its higher-end sibling, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, NanoCell sounds a bit better, which is likely due to its slightly thicker casing. The greater volume allows for the extraction of any hints of low tones – the bass may not be powerful, but it is more clearly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one should not expect miracles. It is still a standard 2.0 speaker configuration with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristics remain similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are adequate, making dialogues in films and news programmes clear. Although this slight improvement in the lower registers is pleasing, for true home cinema or listening to music, it is still worth considering purchasing at least a basic soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC