Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

Info

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.8

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.1

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.5

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    8.7

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.0

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    7.4

    7.0

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.3

    6.5

Advantages

  • Excellent performance with consoles and computers

  • Colour reproduction after calibration

  • Very good performance in sports - advanced motion smoothing system

  • Smooth and trouble-free operation of the Tizen system

  • Very good tonal transition quality in this budget

  • Very good contrast and black levels: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Fairly high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional gaming modes: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide selection of apps

  • Supports multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Possible noticeable light leaks

  • Dolby Vision support not available

  • The matrix has significant smearing

  • Strongly visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor bugs in the system

  • Great chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

Samsung Q70D performed in the test just as it should for its category – very well. The strongest points of the television are undoubtedly its efficiency when using a console and the colour reproduction after undergoing the calibration process. The former will certainly not allow gamers to remain indifferent to the range of benefits that Samsung Q70D can offer, and there are indeed many, including this almost exclusive feature for the manufacturer’s units – the ability to smooth out gameplay while maintaining a reasonable input lag, which allows titles running at 30 fps to perform like those at native 60 frames per second. In the context of gaming, one cannot forget the well-implemented HGIG mode, which, when correctly set up, is on par with games using Dolby Vision. One should also not overlook the ease of pairing the television with the Canal+ decoder, which is not such an obvious advantage, but we know that many people struggle with this issue. Staying on the topic of television, it must be acknowledged that the Samsung Q70D offers very good brightness in SDR materials for its price range, making daytime viewing more than comfortable. A downside for the tested television has to be the lack of Dolby Vision, which would have greatly enhanced the maximum brightness of the Samsung Q70D. One should also not overlook the construction flaws of the device, which may (though not necessarily) lead to light bleed, which can be noticed in dark conditions on less bright scenes. What cannot be taken away from Samsung Q70D is the fact that it features one of the better motion smoothing technologies in its price range, which works excellently in the context of sports events or fast-paced action scenes. The system that operates the television runs very smoothly, and the only complaint one might have is the lack of the Tidal app. In summary, the Samsung Q70D is a good continuation of the manufacturer's seventh series, which year after year gains – both in quality and popularity.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. Indeed, in many respects, it is a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good blacks and brightness that competes with more expensive models. In fact, it is identical to the slightly pricier C6K model that we have already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features that make it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the overall impression is tarnished by the performance of the panel used. The television struggles with noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) causes the image to often appear unnatural and artificial – as if it were being overly sharpened. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS is not its flaws, but its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or slightly less) as the fully-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete construction without those annoying errors. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition – if its price drops drastically. For the moment, a significantly safer and better option remains paying a (often nominal) premium for the C6K model. One could cynically state that the letter "S" in the name indeed stands for "Slim." Only it does not refer to an exceptionally slim chassis, but to how much this model has been "trimmed" in terms of features compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.4/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

2,450:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

2,800:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Samsung Q70D and its related models, such as Q77D and Q74D, utilise a VA panel, which in itself should provide decent contrast. Typically, it is several times higher than in IPS/ADS screens that are not equipped with an advanced local dimming system. The contrast results, as you can see, are quite varied, which is caused by the non-uniformity of the panel. Therefore, at times we can achieve good contrast, whereas at other times it is significantly degraded, but generally fairly consistent, not counting light leakage. Let’s take a look at the film scenes we prepared from the films "Oblivion" and "Revenant". As we can see, in the first one, the lights are well separated from each other, which is a positive phenomenon, as visibility of details in the whites in further tests should be equally good. What stands out the most here is the unusual over-sharpening of smoke visible under the light and the navy black in the background. In the frame from the second film, the first thing that stands out is the uneven backlighting of our scene. It was quite significant and heavily affected the perceived image. Nevertheless, the details in the film were well visible.

Let’s move on to what tigers like the most, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) results from drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black and contrast. In a direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model barely falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we have a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. Interestingly – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones (in the same size) in the C6KS as in the more expensive counterpart we tested! Black levels perform very well. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major flaws that often plague budget constructions without local dimming. Of course, we can’t cheat physics. It’s important to consider that in very demanding scenes (e.g. bright text on a black background), we may occasionally notice undesirable effects, such as blooming (the halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – generally, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

5.5/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.2%, Bt.2020: 68.7%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

433 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

461 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

477 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

475 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

490 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

HDR luminance

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

The brightness that the Samsung Q70D can offer is at a fairly average level, although it cannot be said that the HDR effect will be unnoticeable. Any brightness above 400 nits allows for a clear distinction between SDR and HDR materials. As was the case in the paragraph about contrast and black levels, this time we can observe that the first scene, featuring a bright sun and a dark foreground, possesses the lowest luminance among the measured ones. The result, which can be considered very good for this price range and class of display, is the latter. In a scene where we see a large light source filling a significant part of the frame, the brightness of the television is at its highest, reaching nearly 500 nits. It is worth noting the quite low coverage of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut, which occasionally results in noticeable gaps in the colour palette. Additionally, users can enjoy rich colours and high precision in shade reproduction, making movie screenings a special experience. It is also worth noting that the Q70D Samsung panel performs excellently in eliminating blur during dynamic action scenes, which enhances the viewing comfort of sports broadcasts or games.

And what about HDR? Here, the C6KS performs quite well and – as has become a recurring theme of this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must keep in mind the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible blacks. This is quite a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, "true black" more than additional micro-details, the display of which could cause the screen to appear greyed out. This is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It is also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the slogan of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colours are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide colour gamut reaches as much as 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

6.1/10

5/10

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode on the Samsung Q70D is "Filmmaker," and it was this mode that we used during all our tests. Before calibration, it had several flaws that effectively prevented it from conveying the director's intentions. In both SDR and HDR materials, the white balance was dominated by red and green. As a result, there was a characteristic yellow tint on the image, causing white to appear yellowed and resulting in skin tones that were noticeably too warm. The lowered gamma in standard colour gamut materials resulted in a significant drop in contrast, which was already not the highest. This caused detail in the blacks to be accentuated but also led to overexposure in brighter scenes. The EOTF curve, in this case, proved to be much better and only brightened those scenes with relatively low luminance. This was perfectly evident in the section where we measured the television's maximum brightness in HDR materials. At that point, the frame from the film "Billy Lynn" was unnaturally bright and lacking in depth.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option in the menu labelled as Filmmaker Mode. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of colour reproduction, the lack of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers an almost identical picture characteristic to the aforementioned Filmmaker in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. Therefore, if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colours – the answer is no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.1/10

7.5/10

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration

Fortunately, Samsung provides a wide range of calibration tools in all its televisions, including 2-point and 20-point grey scale adjustment as well as advanced CMS. This allowed us to significantly improve the quality of SDR and HDR content. The vast majority of errors have been corrected, and the image that the Samsung Q70D now generates is definitely closer to the reference. Higher deltaE errors in wide dynamic range content are primarily due to the display's insufficient luminance.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the C69KS's tendency to distort colours has been effectively limited, resulting in a very good final effect. After calibration, we will no longer see excessive warming of scenes in SDR or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it is worth noting the brightness characteristics. In SDR content, it is hard to have any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programmes, or materials from YouTube. It is significantly more challenging to evaluate the television's performance in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behaviour, but its practical variant reveals certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times, it can dim the entire scene. Thus, calibration brought clear benefits in terms of colour quality, but certain limitations resulting from the local dimming operation and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be overlooked, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

4.8/10

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions

Considering how important lighting is in films and series, the overlapping structures and the fluidity of tonal transitions constitute an extremely significant element in assessing the quality of the image. The colour grading in the tested television stands at a fairly decent level. It cannot be said to be outstanding, but it is also not bad. We assess it as adequate. Brighter scenes perform best here, showing the least amount of stuttering. In scenes recorded in darker settings, slight deficiencies in grading can already be noticed, although this is not an issue that would cause discomfort while watching. This may be disrupted by the bleed of the backlighting, which is clearly visible in the last image.

Looking solely at the fluidity of tonal transitions, the C69KS offers no real cause for complaint. The colour gradation is executed correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. So you may be surprised by the low rating in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final rating is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The function responsible for improving gradation has been named "Noise Reduction" in the menu. As we have confirmed, it is worth enabling, as it has a positive effect on tonal transitions. More importantly, it does not negatively affect the film grain or the fine details, which the competition sometimes "blesses" us with.

The image scaling on Samsung Q70D should be rated as average. The manufacturer does not intend to artificially sharpen the image, but rather to leave it naturally softened.

The C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a considerable amount of detail is retained, and the algorithm adds a slight "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. The performance in smoothing tonal transitions is less impressive. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a rather raw state. With older material, this can be quite tiring, as the lack of additional processing highlights any imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.4/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
30%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Samsung Q70D is the first model in the manufacturer's portfolio featuring a 120Hz panel. Consequently, its motion smoothing functions are more advanced than those in lower-tier models. Within the menu, we find three functions responsible for improving smoothness: "Motion Blur Reduction," "Judder Reduction," and "Clear Motion (LED)." We will discuss the third one later. The first function is responsible for sharpness in motion, while the second adjusts the level of smoothing. The smoother in Samsung Q70D performs satisfactorily, and each setting brings noticeable changes. Therefore, those who dislike the characteristic juddering in films or are avid sports viewers will be able to achieve a personalised level of smoothing. In the picture, we present a setting with slight smoothing, without the soap opera effect.

The panel used in Samsung Q70D features a fairly good response time for this type of display. Of course, it won't be as sharp as a proverbial razor, but at this price, it is a recommendable choice for all kinds of sports.

C69KS offers a simplified motion enhancement panel in films, allowing the adjustment of effect intensity with a slider. This makes it easy to match fluidity to personal preferences. The ability to use higher refresh rates is also a plus – although the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p enables 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, however, in practice, the image at these settings exhibits significant motion blur. The effect is so pronounced that the overall presentation appears merely average and loses its appeal for everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.5/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The tested television is equipped with four HDMI 2.1 ports. Interestingly, all of them have a bandwidth of 40 Gbps; however, during the conducted tests, we did not find any negative effects related to this state of affairs. Moreover, and more importantly, Samsung Q70D supports all functions resulting from the aforementioned standard. This news will surely please all gamers, as it means that whether using a console or a PC, we can count on the highest possible comfort during gameplay. Given the typical absence of HDR Dolby Vision for this manufacturer, it is significant that the HGIG mode has been correctly implemented and there is no issue with setting the calibration checkerboard. We particularly note that Samsung, as the only manufacturer, allows gameplay with the smoothener turned on, without significant degradation. This means that titles running at 30 fps will be perceived like those with native 60 frames per second.

Samsung, as one of the first manufacturers, introduced the Game Bar to its televisions, which it has consistently refined since then. It contains all the necessary information regarding gameplay parameters that we can change "on the fly".

To summarise: Samsung Q70D performs excellently both with a console and a computer. All functions worked perfectly and there were no issues with them. The ability to enable the smoothener without a significant increase in input lag is a true game changer.

If we overlook the smudging and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything one can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a well-functioning HGiG. The television can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on a console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings while gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a really successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
9 ms
1080p120
7 ms
2160p60
13 ms
9 ms
2160p120
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
9 ms
2160p120
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
9 ms
2160p120 DV

The latency results in Samsung Q70D are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will certainly appreciate the manufacturer's efforts, which allow for a game running in 4K 120 Hz with HDR to have a mere 7 ms latency, which is virtually unnoticeable even in online games. It is worth adding that the lag with the smoothness enhancer switched on increases by about twice, which still means very comfortable gaming in this case.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, making reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

8/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Compatibility with PC
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Compatibility with PC

After connecting the television to the computer and wanting to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 13 ms, which is practically unnoticeable along the mouse-screen-eye line. Thanks to the correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, the readability of fonts is at a high level, so one can confidently connect the Samsung Q70D to the computer as a monitor and anticipate comfortable work with text.

The subpixel arrangement is BGR, which does not negatively impact the use of the television as a monitor. However, since operating systems are not adapted to such a subpixel format, this may cause slightly less clear outlines. Nevertheless, this is practically negligible and only a handful of people may notice it.

Aside from the aforementioned possibility of working at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor — the darkest ones have a distinct, rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that working on the computer for an extended period can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
71%
80%

Due to the VA panel, the performance of the Samsung Q70D in terms of viewing angles is its Achilles' heel. Even a slight shift from the axis results in a significant loss of contrast and a substantial degradation of colours.

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA matrices. It is a compromise that we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good straight on, but any significant deviation causes rapid drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D: 449 cd/m2

The satin finish of the panel in the Q70D allows for quite good performance in a strongly sunlit room. It is worth noting that the reflections do not extend beyond their source, thus not spilling over onto the rest of the panel. We also commend the maximum brightness of the television in SDR materials, which is 450 nits, allowing for comfortable content consumption during the day.

The C6KS performs really well as a television viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits allows it to easily cut through more challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, the satin finish effectively suppresses reflections. As a result, the television proves to be surprisingly solid during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-NKM2DDEUC-1053.2
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

7.4/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    No
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

The operation of the Samsung Q70D is powered by the proprietary Tizen system. It is quite a well-known software, as the manufacturer has been developing it in its televisions for a really long time. Its main advantage is smooth performance and the absence of significant stutters, which we can confirm through conducted tests. The greatest downside, however, is its closed nature. Although the app store is quite extensive, we are still at the mercy of the manufacturer. Therefore, we will not be able to install missing items, even from a pendrive. A perfect example of this is this year's discontinuation of support for the Tidal app. On the other hand, a benefit, especially for users of Apple equipment, is the implementation of AirPlay, which allows for easy mirroring of content from a device to the television. Fortunately, Samsung has also provided the option to connect a keyboard and mouse for much quicker navigation through the television's menu. It is worth mentioning that the manufacturer has luckily included a remote that connects via Bluetooth this year, which often did not occur in the past. The Tizen system has one more advantage. It integrates very well with external devices such as the NC+ decoder or soundbars. The connection process is very quick and does not require any special skills.

In summary: The Tizen system is very smoothly functioning software, which is certainly a strong advantage of the television. Although more advanced users may complain about the lack of at least KODI, the rest will be satisfied.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It's an environment that offers a lot — ideal for those who prioritise a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and the voice assistant work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply comfortable.

The support for traditional television looks somewhat weaker. Users who are counting on advanced "television" features may feel overlooked. Aside from the efficiently functioning Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player Samsung Q70D is one of its major advantages. It handled almost all video and audio files prepared for the testing process excellently. The only exceptions in this regard are, of course, the Dolby Vision format (which is not surprising) and less popular codecs. Additionally, credit should be given for the support of Polish characters and the ability to change font colours. However, it performs worse with photo formats, as it only supports JPEG among the popular ones. There is definitely a lack of formats such as PNG or Apple's HEIC.

The system player really performs well and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hitch occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g. HEIC) – here TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, e.g. VLC. This way, you can quickly fill in the gaps of the factory player and run virtually any material, customising the TV to your liking.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

6.3/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The built-in audio system Samsung Q70D, due to its slim design, is not among the most outstanding. The overall sound is fairly balanced, although we wouldn't advise increasing the volume above 2/4 of the scale. However, if we have a home cinema system, a number of codecs await us, notably featuring the most important ones, namely DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Atmos.

The TCL C6KS performs practically identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same speaker set branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth keeping the proper perspective. This bass is quite decent compared to other televisions, but a home cinema system or even a basic soundbar will still offer a significantly fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS will be suitable for regular television viewing, but if someone is looking for a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be the natural choice.