Samsung Q8F vs Samsung S85H

Direct comparison

S85H

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”65”77”83”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.3

7.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.3

    8.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.1

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    7.2

    9.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.6

    5.1

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    7.2

Advantages

  • Solid contrast thanks to the VA panel

  • Quite good brightness in SDR and HDR (up to around 500 nits)

  • Satin finish handles reflections well

  • Tizen operating system – fast, intuitive, with a rich selection of applications

  • Solar remote with USB-C charging

  • Integration with the SmartThings ecosystem

  • Excellent input lag

  • Good font readability when working with a PC, suitable as a monitor for text tasks

  • Adjustable stand on multiple planes

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast: OLED

  • Decent HDR brightness of up to around 800 nits

  • High image fidelity after calibration

  • Very smooth motion, 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of gaming features: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth

  • Extensive, smooth-running Tizen system

  • Feature-rich solar-powered remote

  • Support for Dolby Atmos immersive sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Severely limited features for gamers (

  • No USB recording or PiP functionality

  • Average digital image processing

  • Worse reflection suppression than its predecessor, a characteristic of the new OLED SE panel

  • Average SDR brightness; best suited to rooms with controlled lighting

  • No DTS:X support, a drawback mainly for owners of Blu-ray collections

  • No Dolby Vision; not essential, but would be welcome 🙂

Our verdict

Samsung Q8F is quite a successful continuation of the Q67D model. It offers similar image quality in HDR content, and with a brightness of around 500 nits, it can create an effect that is hard to call average. The support for the HDR10+ format also helps, as it has been realistically competing with Dolby Vision for some time and delivers comparable experiences in many productions. The contrast is another positive aspect – for a VA panel, it performs solidly and allows for enjoyable blacks in films and series. However, the greatest advantage of the Q8F remains the operating system. Tizen operates quickly, provides access to many applications, and works well with the SmartThings ecosystem, allowing the television to easily integrate into a larger network of home devices. Interestingly, the Q8F also has a niche application – thanks to its very good font readability, it performs excellently as a screen for working with text. Additionally, there is an adjustable stand that allows the television to be set on practically any desk or narrower TV cabinet. The biggest drawback, in our opinion, is not the image quality itself – as it is difficult to expect miracles in this price range – but rather what has happened to the gaming features. Options such as VRR and HGiG have disappeared with updates, which were available even in simpler constructions in previous generations. Indeed! The manufacturer even boasts about the availability of these features in its catalogue. This makes it difficult to recommend the Q8F to anyone today who plans to connect a console and expects full support for new technologies. Thus, the Q8F is a television that can be appealing – primarily for its design, above-average image quality, and efficient Tizen system. But at the same time, one can see a step backward compared to its predecessor. Let us hope that Samsung will manage to quickly rectify these shortcomings, as otherwise even such a successful 'everyday' television may leave some users with a sense of dissatisfaction.

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

Samsung S85H is a very successful continuation of the S85 series and a television that still fulfils its primary role well – to be an affordable entry into the world of OLEDs. The biggest change compared with the predecessor is the use of the new OLED SE panel from LG Display, but the overall character of the model has remained practically unchanged. Its greatest strengths remain perfect blacks, very high contrast and a picture that can look particularly superb in the evening. Add to that good colour reproduction and the ability to achieve very high fidelity to the director’s vision. The S85H also performs very well as a versatile all-round TV. Gamers get four HDMI 2.1 ports, 120 Hz, VRR, very low input lag and Game Motion Plus, so there is little to criticise here. Tizen runs quickly and smoothly, and the whole system clearly targets users who mainly use Netflix, YouTube and other streaming services today, while treating traditional broadcast TV as an add-on. The new OLED SE panel is not without drawbacks. This is most noticeable when watching during the day, as it is worse at suppressing reflections than earlier organic panels. Its brightness is also not high enough for the S85H to feel particularly at home in a very brightly sunlit living room. It is still a TV that shows its strengths best in the evening or in a room with at least partial control of ambient light. And that is probably the best way to approach the S85H. It is not an OLED designed to break brightness records or compete with the most expensive panels. Its aim is simply to offer what people like most about the technology, but at a lower price. Perfect blacks, a very good picture for films, excellent gaming capabilities and a user-friendly smart system make the S85H one of the easiest ways to get into OLED without spending a fortune.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Base adjustment
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.5/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,650:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

4,100:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Samsung Q8F uses a VA LCD panel, which immediately puts it in a good position when it comes to contrast. By nature, such panels offer deeper blacks than IPS displays, and this effect is indeed noticeable here. In the test patterns, the contrast maintained itself in the range of around 4000:1 to even 6000:1, which in practice results in a surprisingly engaging image, especially in a slightly dimmed living room. Of course, it does not reach the level of LCD screens with local dimming, let alone OLED — sometimes the black can shift to a shade of blue, making the overall image appear flattened. However, Samsung employs a simple trick: so-called global dimming, which dims the entire screen when a lot of dark areas appear. The effect can be impressive, but it comes at the cost of losing some detail, which may not appeal to everyone. Despite this, the Q8F still presents itself significantly better than televisions with IPS panels, offering solid contrast and blacks that can draw you into the cinematic atmosphere.

Changing the panel to the new WOLED SE from LG Display practically changed nothing in terms of black levels and contrast. And it was hard to expect any major improvement here, since we're still talking about OLED, a technology that can switch off each pixel individually. In practice, that means perfect blacks and tremendous image depth, particularly in darker scenes. Black bars are truly black, there is no halo around bright elements, and contrast remains virtually infinite. Even very expensive Mini-LEDs with thousands of local dimming zones still cannot offer the same precision as the S85H. And that's its biggest advantage. The S85H may be Samsung's cheapest OLED, but when it comes to blacks it delivers exactly the same as far more expensive models that use organic panels.

HDR effect quality

5.2/10

6.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.7%, Bt.2020: 66.2%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

473 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

417 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

457 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

210 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

471 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

733 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

744 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

755 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85H

Samsung Q8F

Luminance of RGB colors

In terms of brightness, the Samsung Q8F performs surprisingly well for a television without local dimming. In measurements, it reaches up to 500 nits, which in practice means that most movie and series scenes look pleasing, and it cannot be accused of lacking the 'HDR effect'. In films such as Life of Pi or The Meg, the screen was able to burst with brightness and deliver a light effect at a satisfying level. It struggles more in difficult moments — during dark scenes with individual bright points. The global dimming used causes the television to dim the image to maintain deep blacks, but at the expense of detail brightness. This is clearly visible in the scene from Sicario 2, where the helicopter lights dropped to around 200 nits. This is a conscious design decision that gives the impression of deeper blacks, but somewhat takes away the brightness from individual elements, and one must simply keep this in mind. In terms of colour reproduction, the Q8F uses quantum dot technology, which widens the colour gamut. A coverage of the DCI-P3 palette at 91% can be considered a decent result, although it is not a record-breaking figure compared to other QLEDs.

Interestingly, the new WOLED SE panel has brought a slight improvement in brightness to the S85 series. In the same movie scenes last year's model stayed closer to around 700 nits, while the S85H can reach roughly 800 nits. This isn't a change that completely transforms HDR perception, but that extra brightness is noticeable, especially with pinpoint highlights, specular reflections and stronger special effects. Around 800 nits is already a very good result for an entry-level OLED and in most films it's enough for HDR to have the proper impact. Bright elements can stand out clearly against perfect black, and it's still that contrast that does most of the work. You do need to bear in mind a typical limitation of organic panel technology. When a very bright scene covers a large part of the screen, brightness can drop by almost half. That's the effect of the panel's protection mechanisms, which limit its power with large bright areas.

Colours

The S85H can deliver very pleasing, saturated colours and in most HDR films it looks really good in that respect. We measured around 95% DCI-P3 coverage, so the palette most commonly used in movies is reproduced to a very high degree. Skin tones, greens and stronger reds still have the right intensity, and in normal viewing it's hard to fault them. Only when you look wider at BT.2020 do the limitations of the new OLED SE panel become apparent. Coverage was about 70%, a little less than previous-generation WOLEDs and noticeably less than QD-OLED panels. In films this is not a big loss, because most productions rarely use such highly saturated colours. You're more likely to notice it in games, where creators often opt for more intense colours.

Factory color reproduction

4.6/10

7/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We decided to check out the Filmmaker mode, as it provided us with the best image straight out of the box. However, this does not mean it was perfect. The white balance had too much blue and red, resulting in the white taking on a slight mauve-pink hue. Such an imbalance affected the visibility of practically all colours, as can be seen in the comparison photo below. The brightness characteristics in SDR content were quite well adjusted, though in HDR material we noticed that the television did not always manage its global dimming effectively — at times the screen was too dim, while at other moments it could suddenly brighten. Fortunately, issues related to colours can be effectively corrected with calibration tools, so we decided to get to work.

For colour evaluation we naturally chose Filmmaker mode, and in SDR our S85H sample was very well set up from the factory. The largest deviation is in the white balance, where, as brightness rises, there is a slight lack of blue. In practice this means whites and greys have a subtly warmer tint than they should. However, this is not a major fault and during normal viewing it is unlikely to be very noticeable. Gamma also stays close to the reference value, so the image is neither overly bright nor unnecessarily dim. The S85H’s SDR picture quality is therefore very good straight out of the box. A few more imperfections appear in HDR. Here the white balance drifts more with increasing brightness, blue starts to dominate and the red component is clearly lacking. This also translates into larger errors for some colours. They do not yet amount to shifts that completely change the character of the image, but in direct comparison with a reference the difference is easier to spot. Overall, Filmmaker mode is a very good starting point before professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we managed to correct the white balance to near perfection. Older SDR content looks fantastic — most errors fall within a value range of 2, which is well below the threshold of perceivability for the human eye. In HDR, we also brought the white balance to an acceptable level, but another issue arises here. So why are there still relatively large errors in colour reproduction? This mainly stems from the limited colour palette and the way the television manages brightness. The global dimming technique used does not give the user control in the settings, so when analysing the EOTF curve in HDR films, it is apparent that the Q8F can modify luminance independently. This can be regarded as a certain limitation, but despite this, the picture after calibration is still much more pleasant to view than in the factory version.

Calibration yields very good results on the S85H. First and foremost, it was possible to set the white balance almost perfectly, which removes the slightly too warm character of the image that was previously visible in SDR. Colour reproduction itself also improves markedly, with most errors falling to a very low level and in everyday viewing it is hard to speak of any noticeable inaccuracies. You can also make significant improvements in HDR, although some issues remain due to the TV's inherent characteristics. The S85H does not always hold the brightness curve perfectly; the darkest parts are slightly lifted, and as you approach the panel's limits small deviations are visible in the brightest areas. Added to this is the limited coverage of the wider BT.2020 gamut, which of course cannot be overcome by any calibration. Despite this, the end result is very good and, after calibration, the S85H can produce a really well-tuned, natural image.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Q8F performs really very well. The television beautifully blends colours, both in bright patches of sky and in darker scenes, where it is easy to spot visible "steps" in colours. Admittedly, there are occasional errors, but you have to look closely to catch them. In practice, when watching films or series, the image appears cohesive and does not distract with any artefacts. Therefore, the rating in this category had to be high. 😉

The smoothness of tonal transitions is definitely not a strong suit of the S85H compared with other OLEDs. It is most visible in bright gradients, where fairly obvious banding appears between successive shades. Instead of a perfectly smooth transition you can see distinct colour bands and, unfortunately, you do not have to hunt for them. Moving gradients fare even worse. When tonal transitions move the imperfections become more apparent and the picture looks simply average in this respect. It is not perfect on dark gradients either. You can also notice irregularities there, so the issue is not limited to the brightest areas of the image. Of course, in a typical film you will not see this all the time, but scenes with large areas of similar colour, such as sky, fog, sunset or a dark background, can reveal the panel's limitations. Compared with older WOLEDs there is still some improvement, but looking at the TVs we have tested this year the S85H is average in this regard, much like its rival the LG B6 that uses the same panel. And this is one of those traits where the difference compared with last year's QD-OLED panel becomes very clear. QD-OLEDs handle the smooth blending of successive shades much better and, in terms of gradation, clearly outperform the WOLED SE panel used here.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Let’s check how the Q8F performs with older content, which often has poor quality. Let's start with the positives: the upscaling, or raising the image to a higher resolution, works really well. The television handles both traditional television and YouTube material quite competently, without giving the impression that we are dealing with something completely unattractive. It performs less well with very low resolutions, such as 576p — the image can be cropped, and unfortunately, the overscan issue cannot be turned off. Moreover, the digital processing itself appears less effective. The noise reduction feature, instead of eliminating unwanted disturbances, smooths out almost everything: film grain (which is desirable for many viewers) disappears along with the texture of the image, and the faces of the actors start to resemble characters from cheap Turkish soap operas. Therefore, it’s hard to consider this option useful — it’s best to leave it completely turned off. Perhaps Samsung will refine the operation of this function in future updates, but for now, it’s difficult to view it as anything other than an unnecessary addition.

Samsung has fitted the S85H with the same proprietary AI NQ4 Gen2 processor used in last year’s S85F and, in terms of digital image processing, it performs quite well. Upscaling is one of the model’s stronger points. Lower-resolution material is well sharpened, edges look natural, and the picture does not feel overly artificial. One caveat is a typical Samsung trait: at very low resolutions you cannot completely disable overscan, so the TV may slightly crop the left edge of the image. The "noise reduction" function also works very well, smoothing weaker tonal transitions. The processor can effectively remove posterisation and other imperfections visible in lower-quality material. However, you need to be careful with the strength of this function, because Samsung can be quite aggressive here. When it is activated, small image details, such as the texture of skin or clothing, can start to disappear along with the unwanted artefacts.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@60Hz):

Due to the applied 60 Hz matrix, it is difficult to call the Q8F a television designed for gaming or watching sports. The panel is not particularly fast, which makes motion blur noticeably visible. If you were hoping for spectacular, even 'stadium-like' experiences during broadcasts, you may feel slightly disappointed. Fortunately, in the case of films and series, Samsung has not abandoned the motion blur reduction feature. This is nothing but a motion smoother that allows you to improve the fluidity of productions recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second. This way, you can decide for yourself whether you prefer a smoother, 'television' image or to maintain a cinematic character. It all depends on the viewer's preferences, and the ability to adjust this parameter is undoubtedly a plus.

The S85H uses an OLED panel, so it performs excellently for motion blur. Pixels respond virtually instantly, so moving objects do not leave the characteristic trailing seen on some LCD TVs. This is especially noticeable in sport and fast-paced games, where the picture remains very clean even during rapid motion. The panel itself runs at 120 Hz. That is more than sufficient for films, TV series, sport and console gaming. It is a pity Samsung did not include a higher refresh rate aimed at PC gamers, as more and more TVs now offer 144 or even 165 Hz at 4K. However, that does not affect motion handling in films or sport.

You also have a classic motion-smoothing feature with two settings, blur reduction and judder reduction. So you can decide whether films should retain their cinematic 24 frames per second or whether you prefer to smooth them a little. The S85H gives plenty of freedom here, and the interpolation works well and, with sensible settings, does not generate too many artefacts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

It is not entirely clear what Samsung has meddled with this year regarding its televisions, but the Q8F is not free from all the confusion surrounding updates and shortcomings. While its older cousin, the Q67D, could still be recommended to casual gamers with a clear conscience, it is difficult to find a reason to do so here. Apart from the automatic game mode and the attractively designed Game Bar, we receive practically nothing that could attract gaming enthusiasts. The lack of proper HGiG implementation is a significant issue, especially since after the 1126 update, the feature simply disappeared. The situation regarding VRR is even worse. Although it is listed in the manufacturer's brochures and appears in the Game Bar, we were unable to activate it. The Xbox Series X console did not allow activation at all, and the option remained greyed out and inactive. It is hard to praise such a television even to casual gamers, which is a pity, as Samsung had a strong bargaining chip in the gaming segment for years.

The Samsung S85H is very well prepared for gaming, essentially regardless of whether you connect a console or a PC. The manufacturer hasn't skimped on ports and all four HDMI ports support full HDMI 2.1. That means you can use 4K at 120 Hz, VRR and ALLM without worrying which input your console is plugged into. With multiple devices that matters a lot, because you don't have to choose between a console, a PC or a soundbar connected via eARC. The feature set itself is very comprehensive. The S85H supports VRR, FreeSync and automatic game mode switching, and Samsung also offers its extensive Game Bar where you can quickly check key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. The only notable omission is Dolby Vision, which will matter mainly to Xbox owners. This, incidentally, is typical of Samsung TVs. Game Motion Plus performs very well, and it's one of the features that have set Samsung TVs apart for years. It smooths motion in games running at 30 or 60 fps, but does so without as much increase in input lag as a conventional motion interpolator. In practice, with slower-paced games, racing titles or action games this can really improve the perceived motion, especially if you're sensitive to low frame rates.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
10 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
14 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Fortunately, in terms of gaming, Samsung did not attempt to 'enhance' anything and the input lag remained at an excellent level. Results hovering around 10–15 ms mean that delays are practically imperceptible. The controls are instant, and the responses from the console or computer appear on the screen with no noticeable delay. In this respect, the Q8F performs excellently and it is difficult to fault it in any way.

The Samsung S85H also performs very well in terms of input lag. At 120 Hz we measured input lag below 5 ms, a level at which the TV's response to controls is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the delay is, of course, higher, but still very low, around 10 ms, so in this respect the S85H gives little cause for complaint.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
14ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Although gaming on the Q8F is not particularly attractive — there are no modes with lower resolution and higher refresh rates, and it also has issues with VRR (G-Sync) as well as a limitation of the panel to 60 Hz — it performs excellently as a work monitor. The readability of the fonts is very high, so working with text or Excel spreadsheets is a pure pleasure. In this regard, the Q8F can be a real alternative to a large office monitor.

Samsung S85H will also work very well as a large computer monitor. Font legibility is good and, from the typical viewing distance for such a large screen, text looks really good. You just need to remember the four-subpixel layout of the WOLED panel, because from very close up the edges of letters are not quite as perfectly sharp as on a conventional RGB monitor. However, this is a characteristic of OLED technology itself and, in normal TV use, it should not be an issue.

The S85H also has plenty to offer PC gamers. You get 120 Hz, G-Sync support, very low input lag and, of course, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time. The only thing missing for complete satisfaction is the ability to run the panel at a higher refresh rate. More and more TVs already support 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, so an extra mode like that would be welcome here.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
79%
34%

The viewing angles on the Q8F can be described as average, which is due to the use of a VA panel. When watching the television straight on, the picture looks very good, but just moving slightly to the side causes it to start fading and losing contrast. Colours gradually lose their saturation, and black takes on a shade of grey. This is a typical limitation of this type of panel, and one cannot expect miracles here. Compared to IPS panels, the difference is clear — although they are weaker in contrast, they hold colour better at an angle. The Q8F will perform best in a classic setup, where viewers are seated centrally in front of the screen. If you plan to watch with a larger group, with people spread out across the living room, the effect may not be as satisfying.

Viewing angles are one of the major advantages of the S85H and OLED panels in general. Even when viewed well off to the side, the image still retains good contrast, brightness and colour saturation. In this respect the S85H performs decidedly better than practically any LCD or Mini-LED TV available today. Only QD-OLED panels actually do better, as they can keep colours even more consistent at wide viewing angles. However, those are found only in higher-end models.

Daytime performance

5.6/10

5.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S85H: 350 cd/m2

Samsung Q8F: 430 cd/m2

The Q8F performs quite well during the day. Its brightness hovers around 450 nits, which proves to be a sufficient level for moderately bright living rooms. It is not a television that will win a battle against sunlight streaming directly through the window, but under typical home conditions, the picture remains clear and appealing. A significant advantage is the satin finish of the panel, which effectively reduces reflections and helps maintain colour saturation even when the room is bright. As a result, watching series during the day or evening sports broadcasts with the lights on poses no problems. The Q8F does not aspire to be a cinema television in full sunlight, but as an everyday screen in normal home conditions, it performs really well.

The Samsung S85H is a moderately bright TV. In our measurements the average SDR brightness was around 350 nits, so that should be sufficient for ordinary daytime viewing, provided the TV is not in a very sunlit living room. In a moderately lit room the picture remains readable, but with large windows and light shining directly on the screen the S85H's capabilities start to fall short. We have a few more criticisms of the WOLED SE panel itself. A change in the panel's construction compared with the previous generation has affected how the screen handles reflections, and unfortunately it is not a change for the better. Reflections are more noticeable than on earlier WOLED panels. LG Display tried to partly mask this effect with a more satin screen finish that scatters light, but that does not completely solve the issue. With a strong light source the reflection becomes quite large and a characteristic greyish halo appears around it. Photos clearly show that such a reflection can occupy a large part of the image and greatly affect how it is perceived. So the S85H does not really change the situation compared with cheaper OLEDs when it comes to daytime viewing. It is best suited to evening use or to a room where you have at least partial control over the lighting. It is still comfortable to use during the day, but it is definitely not a television designed for a very bright living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
T-RSLFDEUC-0090-1126.0, E2540300, BT-S
1204
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung Q8F TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85H TV Panel details

Samsung Q8F

Samsung S85H

TV features

7.3/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV Features: Tizen

In terms of smart features, the Q8F does not lag behind what Samsung has accustomed us to. On board, we have the Tizen system – fast, intuitive, and well integrated with other devices. AirPlay, screen mirroring, and simple voice commands work seamlessly, so the basics are checked off perfectly. Additionally, there is SmartThings, an app that turns the television into the centre of a home ecosystem. You can connect a washing machine, vacuum cleaner, light bulbs, or speakers and control everything from one place, including the television. There is also no shortage of apps within Tizen for watching films or series – Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, and Prime Video are readily available. However, it is worth noting that Tizen is a closed system, so anyone hoping to install less popular programmes may be disappointed.

Traditional Television

Traditional television fares worse. The Q8F will simply act as a screen here – it will display the image, but we won't find additional functions such as USB recording or PiP mode. The remote is small and strongly minimalist. It looks modern and can be charged with solar batteries on the back cover or via USB-C, but it must be recognized that it may not appeal to everyone – particularly older users may miss traditional buttons. However, it must be noted honestly that Samsung has been consistently steering its televisions (as has the competition, which copies some of their ideas) towards the smart home, rather than towards equipment "for grandparents." Considering the tremendous popularity of the brand, it can be assumed that most users, even the older ones, have already got used to the fact that the era of remotes with a full array of rubber buttons is slowly coming to an end.

Tizen

Samsung S85H runs on Tizen and, in terms of online features, there is little to criticise. The system is fast and responsive, and the selection of apps is one of the largest on the market. Besides the main streaming platforms you will also find many less popular services, so it’s unlikely you’ll be left without something you really need. Samsung is also developing SmartThings features, integration with other devices and an increasing number of AI-based solutions. There are really lots of possibilities here and some users will probably never explore half of them. A big plus is the promised seven years of system updates. For a television, which we usually keep much longer than a phone or computer, that matters. Tizen should therefore receive new features and fixes for a long time rather than being abandoned after two or three years. The S85H does not, in fact, feel like a cheaper model. We essentially get the same extensive ecosystem that Samsung offers in its more expensive TVs.

Classic features

Samsung’s approach to classic television features looks completely different. It’s clear that for several years the manufacturer has been placing increasing emphasis on "modern" services at the expense of traditional ones. The S85H is therefore not a TV that will particularly appeal to people who are used to extensive control over conventional broadcasting. The supplied remote illustrates this well. It is small, minimalist and has only the most necessary buttons, but lacks a traditional numeric keypad. That works well for streaming, but for those who frequently watch broadcast TV without a set-top box it may not be to everyone’s taste. It’s simply a consequence of the direction Samsung is taking its televisions...

Apps

9.3/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung Q8F handles playing files from USB quite efficiently. It supports virtually all popular video formats as well as photos, so you can easily load a holiday video or a family album. There are occasional exceptions with less common photo formats, but the most important JPEG works perfectly, which will be crucial for the majority of users. It's just a pity that Tizen does not allow for the installation of alternative players, such as VLC. Even then, less popular formats would not pose any problem.

The Samsung S85H's USB file player works quickly and without major problems. The TV handles both videos and photos well, and with the latter we had no issues with unusual resolutions or high megapixel counts. Subtitle support is also a plus, with Polish characters displaying correctly and no additional settings required. The only real shortcoming was lack of support for the HEIC format, which is often used by Apple devices. Apart from that, the built-in player performs very well and will be more than sufficient for most people for everyday use with a USB stick or external USB drive.

Sound

6/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    86dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound on the Q8F can be described as acceptable. A slightly defined bass can be heard, but it is really minimal – the slim design of the television simply does not provide space for the pair of 2 × 10 W speakers to spread their wings. This is a typical scenario for most televisions: if someone cares about truly cinematic experiences, it is worth considering a soundbar. Samsung has a really wide range in this category across various budgets, so it's easy to find something suitable. The television itself will work for watching classic TV and series from time to time, but for greater sound excitement, one should not expect much.

In terms of sound, the S85H hasn't really changed from its predecessor. It still has a fairly basic 2.0 setup with a total power of 20 W, which sounds decent and, for such a slim TV, can even add a touch of bass. It's perfectly adequate for everyday TV viewing, but it's not at the level of pricier models, which can sound fuller and more 'spatial'. With that kind of picture, it really calls for at least adding a soundbar. All the more so as the S85H supports Dolby Atmos and Samsung's proprietary Q-Symphony, which allows a compatible Samsung soundbar to work with the TV's speakers rather than completely replace them. If you want to get more out of this setup for films, an external sound system is the most sensible addition.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

86dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy