Samsung Q7F vs LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

Direct compare

QNED85A / QNED86A / QNED87A / A6A / A6B / A6C

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.7

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.6

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.3

    7.2

  • Gaming on console

    6.3

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    8.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.9

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    6.6

    8.4

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    6.0

Advantages

  • Solid native contrast (VA Panel)

  • Vivid colours thanks to QLED filter

  • Low input lag (around 10ms)

  • Advanced and smooth Tizen operating system

  • Compact sleek design with Type-C charging

  • 120 Hz panel, good for sports and gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Great for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG etc.)

  • Complete set of HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Good compatibility with PC (excellent font readability)

  • Bright picture (around 700 nits in HDR), performs well in moderately bright rooms

  • Good viewing angles (IPS)

  • Support for Dolby Vision

  • User-friendly webOS operating system with Magic Remote and voice assistant

  • Ability to record programmes to USB

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness (only 250 nits in HDR)

  • Lack of many features for gamers including VRR and HGiG – the manufacturer promised something, but in the end, those features are simply not available

  • Lack of many classic "television" features e.g. recording to USB or PIP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Average quality of digital image processing

  • Very poor black levels and contrast due to the IPS panel

  • Lack of the advertised 144 Hz in PC mode

  • Aggressive "light bands" when local dimming is enabled (edge local dimming ruins evening movie sessions)

  • Confusion in model designations and versions – even televisions with the same name in different stores can have different stands (central or two feet) or frame colours, which can be very misleading when purchasing.

Our verdict

The Samsung Q7F is the manufacturer's cheapest model from the QLED line, and it must be admitted that a few advantages can easily be specified here. After calibration, the colours look really good, and the additional QLED filter makes the hues more saturated than in typical budget LCD televisions. Additionally, it features a VA panel that offers quite decent native contrast. It is certainly not at the level of top-tier models, but it performs adequately for everyday viewing. However, the biggest plus is the Tizen system, which is Samsung's flagship offering. It operates smoothly, is feature-rich, provides access to a multitude of applications and add-ons, and at the same time allows for straightforward connection of the television to the SmartThings ecosystem and control of other devices in the home. And basically, this is where the list of advantages ends, as the longer you use the Q7F, the more apparent it becomes that this is a product that is significantly underdeveloped. It's not just about the panel itself with its low brightness and mediocre picture quality in HDR films, but also about the lack of features that typically worked flawlessly in Samsung models. The manufacturer claims the presence of VRR and HGiG, but in practice, they offer no benefit, making it difficult to recommend this television even to casual gamers. It also does not perform particularly well for regular television as the digital image processing is at best average, and the tone transition enhancement feature, which usually worked excellently in Samsung models, hardly functions here. The Q7F is a piece of equipment that can only be recommended to those looking for a television with two phrases on the box: “QLED” and “good Smart TV”. Everyone else receives a rather bland product that falls significantly short of competing even with other more budget-friendly options. It’s a pity because usually, the word "QLED" in Samsung meant something more than just an ordinary television.

QNED86A6A is a television that truly does an excellent job in its price range when it comes to sports, gaming, and everyday TV viewing. The 120 Hz panel ensures smooth images and sharp motion, which both sports fans and gamers will appreciate. It also features low input lag along with a complete set of gaming functions such as HGiG, VRR, and ALLM. The television works just as well with a computer as it does with a console, so whether in the office or on a desk in the 43” version, it serves excellently as a work monitor. Another strong point is the webOS system. This is a fast, stable, and application-rich operating system that, paired with the Magic remote, offers very convenient operation. The new version of the remote is slimmer and fits better in the hand, while the on-screen cursor is a solution that many competitors lack. Additionally, there are classic features – USB recording, Bluetooth for headphones, and a full HDMI 2.1 set with eARC and Dolby Atmos support. This makes the televisions from the QNED85 series some of the most "multimedia" televisions in their class. However, there’s no point in mincing words; this model also has its significant flaws. Its biggest flaw is undoubtedly the contrast, or rather, the lack thereof. The IPS panel combined with edge-lit "mini-LED" is simply a very bad idea. The screen is just not suitable for watching movies in a dark living room. The blacks are bluish-grey, and local dimming can generate light strips reminiscent of lasers, which effectively spoil the desire to watch. This is not a choice that can be wholeheartedly recommended for home cinema. The second problem may not be directly related to the television itself but rather to its sales. It concerns the chaos in naming and discrepancies in derivative versions. The same model, even with the same marking, can have a different bezel colour or stand depending on the store. This can truly be frustrating for the buyer and evoke a sense of confusion. To summarise briefly: LG QNED86A6A is a great television for sports, gaming, and everyday television, with a user-friendly system and substantial functionality. But if you are looking for a screen strictly for movies or series and require deep blacks, it would be better to look towards televisions that can truly be called Mini-LEDs with full confidence.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Height adjustment
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

4.7/10

3.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,850:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,300:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,050:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,850:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Samsung Q7F in the tested size of 55 inches has a VA panel, which immediately translates to decent native contrast. Values around 3000:1 may not be record-breaking, as we know that panels with more than double the contrast are currently being produced, but it still performs much better than IPS or ADS panels, where black quickly fades into shades of grey or navy blue. Unfortunately, we do not find typical local dimming zones here, but the manufacturer has included something akin to global dimming – that is, dimming the entire screen in relation to the content. The effect? In most scenes, black appears rather solid, although during night viewing sessions, we will still see that it more closely resembles dark navy or grey than true pitch black. Overall, it's okay, but without fireworks – it's not spectacular, but it's also not a disaster.

Although the manufacturer describes the QNED86A as a Mini-LED television, there is no multi-zone local dimming system here like those found in more expensive models. In practice, we are dealing with traditional edge lighting, which only allows for dimming horizontal bands of the screen from top to bottom. Combined with a low-contrast IPS/ADS panel, the effect simply falls short. If we decide to leave local dimming on, a problem arises – the television can illuminate selected portions in such a way that it looks like "flying lasers" cutting across the screen. This is very distracting, and it is difficult to speak of truly cinematic experiences under such conditions. Therefore, in our opinion, it is better to turn this feature off. However, one must reckon with the fact that the contrast then drops to around 1500:1, but at least the picture does not irritate with artificial flashes.

HDR effect quality

3.7/10

6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.4%, Bt.2020: 69.2%
DCI P3: 95.4%, Bt.2020: 73.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

215 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

225 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

267 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

113 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

690 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

512 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

HDR luminance

Samsung Q7F

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q7F is not one of the brighter televisions, and this has a direct impact on the quality of HDR films. The peak brightness of the panel is just around 250 nits, which is definitely too low to speak of true cinematic experiences. In practice, the image in HDR content does not differ significantly from classic SDR, making it difficult to talk about any "wow effect" that usually accompanies us when watching such films. During tests of film scenes, the image simply looked dark, and the brightness almost always hovered around the aforementioned 250 nits. The worst performances were with shots that included small, intensely shining elements – the global dimming technique used reacted very aggressively in these cases, dimming the entire screen to maintain the effect of black. However, it is worth noting the presence of the QLED coating that expands the colour palette. For a budget QLED model, the Q7F performs quite decently here: the coverage of the DCI-P3 palette is about 93%, and BT.2020 reaches 70%. This means that, despite the low brightness, the colours can still look quite vivid and attractive.

Against a backdrop of contrast and black, the brightness of the QNED86A and the overall HDR effect perform much better. This is a television that can achieve around 700 nits under the best conditions, so in terms of luminance alone, there is nothing to be ashamed of. As a result, scenes with strong lights, explosions, flashes, or bright parts of the landscape look clear and can make an impression. Interestingly, even in more challenging moments with small, contrasting elements on the screen, the television manages well with their backlighting, and the details are quite visible. The problem arises when there are many dark tones. The lack of effective local dimming causes the black to practically disappear, and instead, we get a grey haze spreading across the entire screen. This kills the sense of depth and makes the image look flat, as if it lacks a cinematic character. In bright animations or colourful family films, this will not be a problem, as vibrant colours and bright light dominate. But in horrors or productions set in darkness, these limitations are very strongly felt. As a comfort, it is worth adding that the QNED86A is actually a QLED television with a PFS LED filter, which gives it very good coverage of a wide colour gamut. Both the DCI-P3 palette and the broader BT.2020 perform really well here. This makes the colours in HDR films saturated, juicy, and with the appropriate depth – even if the black itself disappoints, the colours can save the viewing experience and make the image look attractive.

Factory color reproduction

5/10

5.6/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The factory colour accuracy of the Samsung Q7F is certainly not one of its strong points. In Filmmaker mode, which theoretically should be the closest to neutral, the issue with white balance immediately stands out. There is too much red on the screen, while blue is lacking. The consequences of this are very easy to notice – white, instead of being neutral, takes on warm, almost slightly orange tones. In the long run, this makes the entire image look somewhat unnatural, and bright areas of the scene may seem unrealistic. The problems become even more evident in HDR content. The graphs show that the television has significant errors in the Color Checker palette, which translates to visible inaccuracies in the actual image. Practically, this means that the colours are not presented as they should be. The Q7F also heavily manipulates brightness; darker elements are overly boosted, losing their cinematic quality, while bright parts may appear dimmed. As a result, the image seems flattened, and contrast, instead of helping to bring out details, only highlights its own limitations. This is particularly frustrating in HDR material, where every detail matters. In scenes where there should be a subtle play of light and shadow, the Q7F either oversteps by brightening too much or conversely – suppresses elements that should draw the eye. This causes the image to lose its depth, and instead of cinematic realism, we have a rather simplified effect.

We primarily tested the QNED86A in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to provide the most faithful picture. Unfortunately, right out of the box, there were quite a few shortcomings. The most noticeable was the poorly tuned white balance – there was a lack of blue, causing the overall image to take on a slightly yellowish, and at times even orange hue. An even bigger problem turned out to be the way the television manages brightness. Due to its technical limitations – specifically, local dimming that only works along the edges of the screen – the QNED86A tends to oversaturate entire scenes. This is where the flattening effect we mentioned earlier comes from. Instead of clear depth and contrast, we get something akin to “boosted brightness,” which can strain the eyes over time.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.6/10

7.6/10

After professional calibration, we managed to bring the Q7F into order – at least in terms of SDR content. The picture in this mode looks really good: the white balance has been set correctly, the colours appear natural, and errors in the colour palette have dropped to levels that are practically invisible to the eye. Gamma behaves exemplary, and the only minor drawback is a slight lightening of smaller elements, which results from the lack of local dimming. For everyday watching of television or films in standard quality, the Q7F performs surprisingly well.

It was significantly harder to tame HDR content. Despite adjusting the white balance, the television still heavily manipulates brightness, causing scenes to sometimes look unnatural – what should be subtly darker can be overly brightened, and bright areas of the picture can occasionally appear dimmed. The end result is better than in factory settings, but it is evident that the structural limitations of the Q7F do not allow for the full potential of HDR materials to be fully realised.

What has been saved in the QNED86A6A is undoubtedly the colours. After calibration, the white balance was set with great precision, ensuring that deviations on the Colour Checker palette mostly did not exceed the visibility threshold for the human eye. In other words – the hues finally looked natural, without the strange yellow or orange tones that previously spoiled the perception. Unfortunately, even the best calibration cannot circumvent the structural limitations. The already very modest number of local dimming zones and their unfortunate placement mean that the analysis of the EOTF curve in films still showed clear over-brightening of scenes. The picture tended to flatten, lacking cinematic depth. Fortunately, this effect is not so noticeable in older productions or in SDR content. There, the calibration truly makes a difference and allows one to harness the QNED so that the image can be appealing. However, the specifics of this construction – especially the issues with contrast – cannot be completely bypassed.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

8.9/10

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Q7F is really quite good. The gradients are smooth, without strong stair-stepping or artificial divisions that can be quite noticeable in cheaper televisions. Even in more challenging scenes, such as the one from The Revenant or the red shot with the actor swimming in water, the image maintained quality and simply looked good. If someone were to look very closely, they might notice slight imperfections in extremely demanding moments, but they are subtle enough that most people won't even notice them. For this price range, the Q7F performs surprisingly solidly in terms of gradation, and it's hard to find anything significant to criticise.

The colour blending is one of the stronger points of the QNED86A. During everyday viewing, the image is presented very smoothly, without noticeable "steps" or sudden transitions between colours. The television handles colour merging in a quite natural way, so with most material, it is difficult to spot issues with gradation. Any imperfections only appear under extreme conditions – for example, in the darkest parts of films, where even much more expensive televisions can encounter problems. There you might notice slight banding or characteristic stripes, but these are marginal situations that should not interfere during normal usage. Overall, the QNED86A performs quite well in this category and has nothing to be ashamed of in comparison to the competition.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

4.5/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Upscaling and digital image processing on the Q7F is a bit of a sine wave. On one hand, we have really nice upscaling – weaker sources look better than one might expect. The image becomes clearer, sharper, and even older films or terrestrial television perform adequately. Samsung has been strong in this area for years, and the Q7F confirms that. On the other hand… there are some issues. The television has a problem with overscan – part of the image is simply cut off, and it doesn't look very elegant. Additionally, we were let down by a feature called "noise reduction", which should improve the smoothness of tonal transitions in weaker materials. In other Samsungs, it works relatively well, but here it makes practically no difference – the banding in gradients is still there. It's a bit of a shame, as one could have expected more from a model that is aimed at users looking for a display for SDR content.

If someone is worried about potential "steps" when blending colours, there is a simple way in the QNED86A to address this. Just activate the feature called Smooth Gradation and set it to a medium level. Then the television really smooths out all those unwanted transitions quite well – especially in older productions – and it does so in a way that film grain doesn't disappear, nor do strange artefacts appear. In other words, it can be used without concern.

The upscaling itself also performs quite well. Of course, there are no miracles here – with lower quality sources, you can notice characteristic ringing. Fortunately, there is a sharpness slider in the menu, and if someone prefers a more "soft" image, it can be quickly adjusted to personal taste.

Blur and motion smoothness

5.5/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
62%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Ghosting and motion smoothness in the Q7F are probably the most budget-friendly elements of this television. The 60 Hz panel makes itself known, with noticeable ghosting, especially in dynamic scenes, and it's rather difficult to regard this model as equipment designed for watching sports or playing fast-paced games. In tests with the little green man, a long trail was left behind, similarly to how a ball in a football match would leave streaks.

On the plus side, the presence of motion smoothing must be acknowledged. In films, it actually makes a difference – especially since most material is recorded at 24 frames per second. Here we can decide whether we prefer a more "cinematic" image, with slight judder typical of cinema, or a smoother, more "television" approach. This part works quite well and helps to improve the viewing experience for series and films.

The QNED86A is equipped with a panel boasting a refresh rate of 120 Hz, so it can be said from the outset that it is suitable for both sports and gaming. And indeed, it is – the image appears smooth, and motion blur is not particularly intrusive. IPS panels have always had some issues with this, and here too, slight blurring can sometimes be noticed, especially in very dynamic scenes, but it is not something that ruins the viewing of a match or a fast-paced game. For cinema and sports fans, LG has included the traditional TruMotion smoothness enhancer. In the menu, we have two sliders – one for movies (De-Judder) and the other for sports (De-Blur). The first adds missing frames and can be adjusted to modify the character of motion – from raw, cinematic to a smoother, more ‘theatrical’ look. The second improves sharpness during dynamic actions, so it's worth turning it up a bit if you watch a lot of sports.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.3/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Features for gamers in the Samsung Q7F is a topic that evokes quite a lot of mixed feelings. On the one hand – no sensible person expected miracles here, as it is after all a 60 Hz television and it was clear from the start that it would not be a device for squeezing the maximum out of a console or PC. On the other hand, since the manufacturer promised specific solutions in promotional materials, it is natural that we wanted to see them in practice. At the outset, it’s quite decent. The automatic game mode (ALLM) works, so there’s no need to manually fiddle with the settings; the console automatically switches the television to low-latency mode. Additionally, we have the Game Bar, which looks impressive and allows you to check a few basic parameters without leaving the game. And this is where the good news ends.

The biggest problem with the Q7F is VRR, or rather its absence. Yes, an appropriate icon appears in the menu, and you can even see it in the Game Bar, but throughout the entire test, the feature remained inactive and could not be enabled in any way. The situation with HGiG is even more painful; this option was indeed available at the beginning, but after a software update, it completely vanished, which is simply unprofessional. Therefore, the Q7F is only suited for the absolute basics. Of course, you can turn on the console, play some calmer titles, and enjoy low input lag, but if someone is counting on more advanced features that the manufacturer promised, they will be disappointed. This is not a television to buy with gaming in mind, and it's better to be aware of that before making a purchase.

In terms of gaming, the LG QNED86A6A is a complete tool. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, which means that whether you connect a PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, or a powerful PC, everything will run in full 4K at 120 Hz with support for all functions. This is a significant advantage, as some competitors still only offer two such ports, which can be troublesome with multiple devices. It also includes VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing, as well as ALLM, which automatically activates game mode when the console is turned on. Dolby Vision Gaming is also included, along with proper implementation of the HGiG format, so titles that support these formats look more vivid and detailed. On top of all this, there is the Game Optimizer – a sort of control centre for gamers. From this interface, you can view picture parameters in real-time, quickly change modes, activate additional features, or adjust image settings to your personal preferences. The LG QNED86A6A essentially has everything one could expect from a modern gaming television.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
15 ms
1080p120
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
2160p120 DV
6 ms

Input lag on the Samsung Q7F is really good for a television with a 60 Hz panel. Measurements showed values below 12 ms, which means that for regular gaming on a console, this model is more than sufficient. Of course, it is not on the level of high-end 120 Hz screens, which can go as low as 6–7 ms, but in everyday practice, it is hard to talk about noticeable delay. In this respect, the Q7F does not fall behind its competitors in its segment and can easily be considered a safe choice for casual or sports gaming. At least in this regard.

There is really nothing to complain about here. The QNED86A6A achieves excellent results – around 5 ms with 120 Hz content and roughly 15 ms with 60 Hz. These values will easily satisfy both console gamers and those who connect a PC to the television. The response to movements is instantaneous, so you can forget about delays between the image and the action on the controller.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

8/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

Collaboration with a PC on the Q7F is decent, although it is not a television that will satisfy the most demanding users. Fonts are displayed clearly and sharply, so it is perfectly fine to work on it – especially for daily office tasks or browsing the internet. With thin letters, one can notice slight shadowing, but it is not something that interferes with normal use. In a smaller size, the Q7F can indeed work as a computer screen, although one must remember its limitations. The lack of variable refresh rate means we cannot use G-Sync or FreeSync, and 60 Hz practically closes the door to more demanding PC gaming. For work and light usage, it will be okay, but for serious gaming, it is definitely better to look for something higher in Samsung's offering.

LG QNED86A, thanks to the use of an IPS matrix, a full RGB subpixel layout, and correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, makes fonts look fantastic on the QNED86A6A. The text is sharp, clear, and legible, making the television ideal for office work. This is important, as this year the model also debuts in a 43" size, and such a variant can easily land on a desk and serve as a large monitor. Of course, some users who opt for the 43" version will be gamers, and here too there are no reasons for complaints. The television supports 4K at 120 Hz, so gameplay is smooth and enjoyable. It's a bit of a shame that there is no higher refresh rate mode like the 144Hz declared by the manufacturer, as PC gamers would surely appreciate that. Despite this, the QNED86A6A performs really well as a monitor for gaming and work.

Viewing angles

3.5/10

6.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
61%

The viewing angles on the Q7F are simply poor – typical for a VA panel. Just sitting slightly to the side immediately shows that the image loses quality. Colours fade, contrast clearly drops, and blacks start to resemble grey more than anything deep. This is a television that is definitely best viewed head-on, and any wider viewing angle comes with compromises.

QNED86A6A performs very well in this regard. The IPS panel used here ensures that the image maintains its brightness and colour saturation even when viewed from an angle. There is none of the fading effect often seen in cheaper TVs with VA panels. Of course – there is no point comparing this to the level offered by organic panels, where colours and contrast remain perfect from almost every angle. But as far as LCD TVs go, this is definitely one of the better results and is more than sufficient for watching films or sports together on the sofa with a larger group.

TV efficiency during daytime

3.9/10

5.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A: 462 cd/m2

Samsung Q7F: 237 cd/m2

The performance of the Q7F during the day unfortunately does not impress. Due to its low brightness, the screen quickly capitulates in very sunny rooms. It is therefore hard to recommend it to those who plan to watch television in a bright living room with large windows. In moderately lit rooms, it still performs adequately, but in bright light, the picture loses clarity. Additionally, the fact that the panel does not always effectively handle glare means reflections can be distracting during the day. This is more of a screen for evening viewing rather than for daily sessions in full sunlight.

QNED86A6A is not a champion of brightness, but it manages adequately. Thanks to the moderately high brightness of the panel and quite decent reflection handling, the television will perform well in typical, moderately lit living rooms. The image remains clear, and the colours do not lose their intensity in daylight. However, let's not fool ourselves; this is not a screen that will cope in extremely bright conditions, where sunlight streams through large windows and floods the room.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-RSLFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
33.20.74
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Samsung Q7F

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

TV features

6.6/10

8.4/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV – Tizen System

Here Q7F shows its strongest side. Samsung has been developing the Tizen system for years, and it is evident that we are dealing with a mature, well-refined platform. Everything runs smoothly, the menu does not lag even when switching between heavier applications, and installing additional programmes from the library is quick and hassle-free. In addition, there is full support for AirPlay, integration with voice assistants, as well as a wide range of add-ons – from cooperation with devices in the SmartThings ecosystem to the ability to control Philips Hue smart lighting or other smart gadgets. Samsung strongly focuses on advanced networking features, and this is evident – in terms of Smart TV, the Q7F has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, and on the contrary, it can embarrass more expensive competitors.

Classic Features

On the side of classic, “television” solutions, it is clear that the manufacturer has bet everything on the smart card. We will not find any USB recording or PiP mode here, which used to be standard features. It is evident that the Q7F is meant to be primarily a multimedia centre, rather than a device for those accustomed to more traditional solutions. Fortunately, several practical additions are not lacking – we have Bluetooth for pairing headphones or speakers, and the option to change the font size in the menu, which will be appreciated by users with weaker eyesight.

Smart Features: webOS

QNED86A6A operates on the well-known webOS – a system that has been a strong point of LG televisions for years. Everything runs quickly and stably, applications launch without significant delays, although the interface can occasionally feel a bit overwhelmed by advertisements. Fortunately, on a day-to-day basis, convenience outweighs these shortcomings. A significant advantage is the Magic Remote control, which allows you to operate the cursor like a mouse – it's one of those solutions that you quickly get used to and find it hard to give up later. In the new version, the remote is slimmer, as it has been stripped of the numeric keypad. Some will appreciate the simplicity, while others will miss the classic set of buttons; it's more a matter of habit.

Classic Features

We also find a few features on board that may not always be obvious in 2025. There is the ability to record programmes from the built-in DVB-T2 tuners to USB, so you can easily return to a match or series at any time. In the evening, Bluetooth headphone support will come in handy – especially if someone in the house falls asleep quicker than we do. Additionally, there is a full set of HDMI 2.1 ports with eARC support and audio formats such as Dolby Digital and Dolby Atmos.

Playing files from USB

9/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

In the Q7F we have a built-in file player, and as is usually the case with Samsung televisions, it works quite well – most popular films or music will play without fuss. For basic use, it is sufficient, and there is no real need to reach for external solutions like connecting a laptop. It is worse if someone wants to upload photos – here it can lag, especially with Apple's HEIC or PNG, which are visible in the player menu but do not necessarily want to work.

The built-in media player in the QNED86A6A performs quite well with the most popular audio and video formats. During testing, we had no issues playing MP4, MKV, or MP3 files; everything played smoothly and without stutters. The television also handled most images, although we encountered a typical barrier for many manufacturers – lack of full support for the HEIC format from Apple. So if you use an iPhone daily and store photos in this standard, you will need to convert them beforehand or, better yet, transfer them using AirPlay. Other than that, it’s hard to find fault as, for a built-in solution, it's really decent.

Apps

8.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

5.8/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    80dB
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The Samsung Q7F comes with a 20 W speaker system and… well, let’s not kid ourselves, it’s nothing revolutionary. The television itself sounds quite decent, meaning we can clearly hear series, news, or daily programmes; dialogues do not get lost, but there’s a significant lack of depth and sound space. There is virtually no bass; it thuds somewhat, but it resembles more of a box being tapped rather than true low tones. Music comes across flat, and films don't make any significant impression – we won’t feel like we're in a cinema. It’s sound from the ‘acceptable’ category, just enough to have something built-in, but if someone is counting on a stronger experience, they will inevitably reach for a soundbar sooner or later. And to be honest – even the simplest model will make a considerable difference, and Samsung has quite a few in their offering.

In terms of sound quality, the QNED86A6A performs quite decently, but there's no denying that it isn't at a level that would impress home cinema enthusiasts. The sound is clear and distinct, with dialogues easy to hear, but overall it sounds rather flat and definitely lacks solid low tones. For everyday television viewing, streaming services, or news, this level is acceptable; however, if you plan to watch movies or play games more often, even a basic soundbar will make a significant difference.

Acoustic Measurements

80dBC (Max)

75dBC

84dBC (Max)

75dBC