Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F vs Philips MLED920 / MLED910

Direct compare

QN70F / QN74F / QN77F

Info

MLED920 / MLED910

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.1

6.5

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.6

    6.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    6.9

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.2

    4.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.3

    5.5

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    5.5

  • Apps

    8.7

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    6.4

    6.2

Advantages

  • Nice black and contrast

  • Above average panel brightness

  • High refresh rate of 144Hz

  • Many features for gamers: ALLM, VRR, Game Bar etc.

  • Low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Advanced and smooth Tizen operating system

  • Super slim design

  • Deep black and high contrast thanks to mini-LED backlighting

  • HDR brightness reaching 700–800 nits in real film scenes

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Ambilight – an element that adds atmosphere, especially in the evening

  • A wide range of supported audio formats: DTS:X, Dolby Atmos, Dolby True HD 7.1

  • 144 Hz panel with support for VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Loud sound (up to 88 dB)

  • Illuminated remote control

Disadvantages

No like
  • No USB recording feature

  • No DTS format

  • Issues with the HGIG function (for gamers)

  • Symbolic local dimming (Is this really MINI-LED?)

  • Titan OS is quite underdeveloped – there are significant bugs and missing features in the applications

  • Few user functions

  • Hybrid infrared remote control

  • Issues with the fluidity of tonal transitions in dark scenes

  • The television is not suitable (other than for gaming) for use with a PC – strong dithering and poor readability of fonts, especially coloured ones and on dark backgrounds

Our verdict

Samsung QN70F is quite a decent television from the mid-range segment. Its strongest point is definitely the smoothness of the picture – thanks to the 144 Hz panel, low input lag, and a plethora of gaming features, we have here a recipe for an almost perfect gaming screen. It also performs well for sports fans – the picture is fast, clear, and there are no tears. In terms of picture quality – it’s really not bad at all. The VA panel provides good blacks, brightness is above average, and colours look great after calibration. Samsung advertises the QN70F as Neo QLED, meaning Mini LED, and in a sense, you can view it that way – but only partially. The backlighting is edge-lit, so it is far from being a full-fledged Mini LED with local dimming. It’s a shame, as marketing has its influence, and the user may feel somewhat misled. Additionally, there are minor shortcomings – no USB recording, no DTS support. But despite everything, the QN70F leaves a really good impression. It may not be a “true” Mini LED, but for its price, it is a solid piece of television – especially for gamers and those who enjoy fast, dynamic content.

The Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year's model PML9000, but it is not a repetition of the past. It is clear that the manufacturer has done their homework – primarily, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year could significantly ruin the viewing experience. Now, blacks and contrast look much better, and with Dolby Vision present here, even HDR content appears quite decent. The picture can sometimes shine where it should, without straining the eyes during difficult scenes. Undoubtedly, the biggest asset of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a completely new atmosphere – the screen seems to extend beyond its borders, and the entire room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that not only cinema enthusiasts will appreciate but also gamers, who, alongside the lights, receive a full set of features typical for modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. However. Indeed, there is a significant however – here we reach the most difficult part of this verdict – it is still a dual-purpose device. On one hand, we have a strong picture and a unique Ambilight feature, while on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a considerable hindrance, full of bugs and deficiencies, which cause the television to lag behind the competition. On top of that, the price is not low at all given the offered capabilities. Therefore, it is difficult to recommend it unambiguously to everyone. However, if you are looking for the brightest Philips screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of gamer features, and basic applications – the MLED920 will be quite a suitable choice.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel colour
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.2/10

7.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 20 (1 x 20)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 144 (12 x 12)

Contrast:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

9,200:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,700:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,300:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

298,900:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

38,500:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

23,950:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

The QN70F is equipped with a VA panel that offers a high native contrast – this is already a good starting point for black levels, especially during evening viewing. However, its capabilities do not theoretically end there. The television is branded as Neo QLED, which indicates the presence of Mini LED technology and a local dimming system. And indeed – the QN70F has this function. The problem is that we are not talking about classic local dimming with LEDs positioned directly behind the panel. Instead, edge lighting has been implemented with an overall dimming mechanism known as global dimming. The effect of this is that instead of selective brightness control in individual zones, the entire screen is slightly dimmed when a dark scene appears. In practice, this means that the contrast is average compared to Mini LED models that offer true local dimming. The black levels are not bad – thanks to the VA panel itself – but one cannot speak of precise light control like that provided by advanced systems with multiple zones. This raises the question: is the QN70F series really a Mini LED television, or just a marketing variation on the Q70 series? Looking at the technical aspects – it is hard to consider this model a full-fledged representative of this technology. But in everyday use, the black levels appear decent and for many people may be fully satisfactory.

The Philips MLED920 in the 55-inch version that we had the opportunity to test features a VA panel with high contrast. The panel itself is one thing, but the true distinguishing feature of this model is the mini-LED backlighting. This largely determines how black levels and contrast appear – and it must be said that Philips has made a significant leap forward compared to the models from 2024, where the local dimming algorithms were simply mediocre. The new version is much improved, and the contrast presented by the MLED920 can truly surprise positively. At times, it resembles the level known from the best LCD televisions on the market – blacks can be deep, the picture gains a sense of three-dimensionality, and watching films in a dark room makes a great impression. Of course, as with any mini-LED television, this is not a picture completely free of compromises. With a large amount of fine details on the screen, local dimming algorithms can sometimes get confused – at times dimming details more than we would like, and at other times brightening the background, resulting in slight, light blue halos around objects (the so-called halo effect). Despite these imperfections, we must emphasise that black levels and contrast are truly a strong point of the Philips MLED920 and definitely one of the reasons why it should be considered in the mid-range category.

HDR effect quality

5.6/10

5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG, HDR10+
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.7%, Bt.2020: 75.7%
DCI P3: 89.9%, Bt.2020: 65.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

619 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

422 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

483 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

722 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

775 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

131 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

HDR luminance

Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F

HDR luminance

The QN70F is a television that can pleasantly surprise when it comes to brightness. In ideal testing conditions, it reaches up to 800 nits, which – for this price range – is a really solid figure. Of course, this result comes from measurement charts, so we decided to check how it performs in practice, with real films. Here, the television somewhat tempers its capabilities. In most tested scenes – for example, in "The Meg" – the actual HDR brightness hovered around 500 nits. This is still a decent result, allowing for enjoyment of HDR effects, although it is far from perfect. On the other hand, we have a QLED screen with a layer of quantum dots, which means very good colour reproduction capabilities. The colours are vibrant and saturated. The QN70F covers about 94% of the DCI-P3 colour space, and in the wider BT.2020 palette, it exceeds 75%, so in this respect, there is nothing to be ashamed of.

Philips MLED920 in our measurements in static tests even reached around 900 nits, which is really a solid result for a mid-range model. In practice, this translates to a lot of satisfaction during viewing sessions – in scenes rich in bright light, such as the first, third or fifth test slide, the screen managed to generate about 700 nits, which is sufficient to feel the true "HDR effect." However, it cannot be denied that the limited number of dimming zones and the compromises typical of mini-LEDs in more demanding scenes reveal their nature. In sequences with small light sources – like the moon or a scene from the film Sicario 2 – the television clearly prioritises maintaining deeper blacks at the expense of the brightness of these small elements. For most viewers, this is still a reasonable compromise, as the dark background looks significantly better, though it is important to be aware that the details themselves may not impress with their intensity. There is also a certain sense of dissatisfaction regarding the colours. Although the applied PFS filter (the equivalent of quantum dots known from QLEDs) does its job and the colours appear quite vivid, the coverage of the DCI-P3 palette reaches “only” 90%. In everyday viewing, this will be sufficient, but in extremely colourful productions – like the latest Disney animations – one can notice that some tones are not as vibrant as they could be in other setups.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

5/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN70F in its best default picture mode, which is Filmmaker Mode. I must admit that in this particular test unit, the factory settings performed quite well. The image was calm, natural, and despite minor deviations – pleasant to watch. The biggest flaw was a slight dominance of red in the white balance, which caused a slight pinkish hue across the entire scene. However, this was not a glaring defect – rather subtle and only noticeable when directly compared to a properly calibrated screen. A somewhat larger issue arose in the brightness characteristic. The television tends to underestimate the brightness of parts of the image that should be displayed more brightly. As a result, some details can appear slightly muted – not so much lost completely, but not resonating as clearly as they should. Nonetheless, as far as televisions in this category and in these settings are concerned – we consider the result a good starting point for further calibration.

Like every Philips television we tested, we primarily assessed the MLED920 in Filmmaker mode – this is meant to be the "most honest" mode, designed for films and to faithfully convey the intentions of the creators. Indeed, in terms of colour reproduction, it performs the best among all the modes available on the television, but it is not without flaws. The first thing that catches the eye is the white balance. The image has a slight tendency towards purple-pink tones, which gives it a somewhat unnatural character. An even bigger problem, however, turned out to be what we mentioned earlier – image blooming. Just looking at the gamma or EOTF charts reveals that the line significantly deviates from the norm, dropping below a value of 1.8. In practice, this means "bleeding" of the brightest whites, where the image becomes almost milky. Fortunately, most of these issues can be corrected – the MLED920 responds well to calibration, and with a few adjustments, one can significantly improve the viewing experience.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7.5/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, the QN70F shows that it can offer a truly high level of colour reproduction. The white balance was nearly perfectly aligned, and the values in the Color Checker test dropped below level 3 – meaning below the threshold at which the average eye can perceive differences. The image looks natural, and the colours are faithfully rendered, without excessive saturation or the coolness known from factory settings. It must be admitted that Samsung provides very extensive calibration options – not only for enthusiasts but also for professionals. The QN70F takes advantage of this potential and, after proper adjustment, can come close to significantly more expensive models in terms of colour accuracy. The only thing that can still be nitpicked is the brightness characteristic. There is still a tendency to lighten the smallest areas of the image – particularly those that should remain darker. However, this is a design feature of this model, not a calibration error. Despite this, the final effect definitely deserves recognition.

After calibration, we managed to largely tame the white balance – to the extent that the average viewer will not be able to detect distortions in colours. The characteristic pink-purple haze that previously disrupted the naturalness of the image has also disappeared. The colour palette has been organised, and the colours appear more coherent and neutral. The gamma in SDR content post-calibration looks really good – there is no longer any mention of the previous 'bleeding' effect in bright scenes. The image has become more contrasty and devoid of that milkiness which had previously greatly harmed the viewing experience. In the case of HDR content, the improvement is also noticeable, although here it is still evident that the television is going 'its own way'. The EOTF curve cannot be fully shaped, as Philips simply does not offer the tools to allow precise control over this parameter in its settings. In many films, the television still exposes the image 'in its own way'. Despite these limitations, the calibration has delivered quite a bit of good – most of the colour distortions have been minimised, and the overall balance of the image has significantly improved. However, it must be noted that certain barriers stem from the very design of the hardware and simply cannot be overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

6.5/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of the fluidity of tonal transitions, the QN70F performs really well. Gradients are smooth, and colours blend into each other without obvious thresholds or banding. Even in more difficult movie scenes – particularly those that are very dark – any possible imperfections are minimal and you really have to make an effort to notice them. In regular viewing, most users should not encounter any issues with colour merging. The image looks clean and coherent, without artificial smoothing or distortions. This is another aspect in which the QN70F pleasantly surprises.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Philips MLED920 is not its strongest point. In our tests, we quickly noticed that the television has noticeable issues in darker scenes – examples include segments from the film The Green Knight or test grey palettes. There, the characteristic banding of colours and too sharp transitions between shades can be quite evident, particularly in productions that maintain a darker aesthetic. Fortunately, the situation is better in brighter scenes – there, the image appears smooth and without significant artefacts.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Samsung QN70F offers a distortion reduction feature that enhances the smoothness of tonal transitions. In "Standard" mode, it works quite well – it smooths out problematic transitions without significantly interfering with the structure of the image. Film grain is somewhat reduced, but details such as texture and skin structure remain visible. The "High" mode is much more aggressive. The smoothing is stronger, but it comes at the cost of a noticeable loss of detail. Therefore, in practice, we recommend sticking with the "Standard" setting or completely turning this function off. The improvement in gradation may be less spectacular, but the image retains more naturalness.

When it comes to scaling low-quality content, the QN70F performs very well. Tests with lower resolution images were really very good. Despite slight edge ringing, everything looks clean and clear, even if the original content was very poor. It’s just a pity that the television has an issue with overscan, which cannot be completely turned off. As a result, images with very low resolution may be slightly cropped, which is mainly noticeable on subtitles or interfaces.

The manufacturer has equipped this model with several features that improve signal quality, and although we usually approach such "enhancements" with caution, here they prove to be really helpful. The key option is called "distortion reduction" – it works best at a medium level, as on one hand it effectively smooths out unwanted stair-stepping and colour banding, while on the other it does not excessively cut out details, allowing the image to still look natural.

Things are a bit worse with upscaling. Lower quality materials – such as the test video with the model – appeared soft and lacking in sharpness. Indeed, it can be partially corrected with the sharpness slider in the menu, but the effect remains far from what competitors in a similar price range offer. Philips therefore still needs to work on this element, as compared to the successful improvement of tonal transitions, the upscaling simply falls short.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.5/10

7.8/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
63%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie (4K 144Hz):

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

The QN70F is a television with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which in itself places it among the top when it comes to image fluidity. Whether we are watching dynamic sports broadcasts or playing on a console – the picture looks very good. There is no sense of stuttering, choppiness, or the typical "tearing" associated with weaker models during fast motion. Samsung also allows you to adjust the fluidity to your own preferences. In the picture clarity settings, we find options such as blur reduction and judder reduction – each of which we can adjust independently. This is especially useful when watching content with a lower frame rate and wanting to give it a smoother, more theatrical character – or conversely, to maintain the natural cinematic "feel" of 24 frames.

The Philips MLED920 features a 144 Hz panel, which immediately suggests that we shouldn't complain about motion smoothness. And indeed – the motion blur is relatively low for a VA panel, and although slight issues can sometimes be noticed on darker backgrounds, they are not something that would stand out to most people during regular viewing.

Another significant advantage is the presence of a motion smoother called “Motion Style.” It allows you to adjust the sensation of smoothness to your own preferences – if someone prefers a more “theatrical,” almost television-like image, they can increase the sliders, whereas if they prefer to maintain the natural “jumps” of cinematic frames, it’s enough to set lower values. This way, everyone can find their golden mean.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.2/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Samsung QN70F is truly a solid choice for gamers. Here, we find as many as four HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps, meaning full support for gaming in 4K at a refresh rate of 144 Hz. Additionally, it includes all the essential features we expect today: automatic game mode (ALLM), variable refresh rate (VRR), and a very well-designed, intuitive Game Bar showing information about mode, resolution, and frame rate.

Also noteworthy is the Game Motion Plus feature, which allows artificial frames to be added to games running at 60 fps or less. This works surprisingly well and in many titles – particularly those where consoles struggle to maintain a stable framerate – it improves the fluidity of gameplay without significant delay.

Unfortunately, there are some drawbacks. The lack of support for Dolby Vision mode is not surprising – it’s a standard with Samsung. However, the absence of the HGiG feature is much more disappointing. Worse still, it was removed with a software update, which may leave users who previously relied on it quite puzzled. Without HGiG, it is impossible to manually set the maximum HDR brightness from the console, resulting in some games appearing slightly washed out – especially if the television misinterprets the tonal range. Why Samsung, a brand that has set standards for gaming features for years, decided to take such a step is hard to say. At the time of writing this review, the tested television was running on software version 1110 – and frankly, if you care about full support for gamers, it’s better to hold off on updates for the time being.

For gamers, the Philips MLED920 is truly a complete tool. The manufacturer has taken care of everything that is considered standard in televisions designed for consoles and PCs today. It features ALLM, so the console automatically switches the screen to game mode, alongside VRR and a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which guarantees smooth gameplay even in fast-paced titles. All key HDR formats are supported – including HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming for Xbox – which means that regardless of what you are playing and on which console, the television will be able to extract the maximum potential from the image. The Game Bar also proves useful in daily gaming – a relatively simple implementation by Philips, but a functional panel where you can quickly check image parameters, enable VRR or adjust settings without leaving the game. It may not be as comprehensive as the competition, but it performs its task flawlessly. And finally, something that sets Philips apart from the competition – Ambilight. The three-sided LED backlighting can create a huge impression in games, especially in the evening. It's also a way to slightly 'extend' the screen and enhance the feeling of immersion. And as colourful LEDs have recently become almost a mandatory element of a gamer’s room, the MLED920 fits into this trend perfectly.

Input lag

10/10

9.6/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
18 ms
1080p120
8 ms
9 ms
2160p60
14 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
35 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

QN70F does not disappoint in terms of response time either. For 120 Hz materials, the input lag hovers around 8 ms, which can be considered a very good result – especially in the context of online competition or dynamic action games. The screen responds to the movements of the controller almost instantaneously, with no noticeable delay. As a result, the gameplay is smooth and comfortable, even in more demanding titles. In this category, Samsung still maintains a high standard, and it is hard to find anything that could raise objections.

The input lag on the Philips MLED920 is really very good – in 120 Hz mode, we measured values below 10 ms, which places this model among the absolute top tier of LCD televisions in terms of responsiveness. Even at 60 Hz, a result of around 18 ms is fully acceptable and will not interfere with any type of gameplay. A notable exception is the Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, where the lag can increase to as much as 35 ms. This is a result that might be slightly jarring for esports players, but we must honestly admit – for most so-called "casual gamers", it will be absolutely imperceptible. Especially since we are talking about values that still allow for comfortable gaming without significant compromises.

Compatibility with PC

8.2/10

4/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
9ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Compatibility with PC
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Compatibility with PC

Let's start with the best aspect of connecting the QN70F to a computer – gaming. A refresh rate of 144 Hz, support for G-Sync compatible VRR, and very low input lag create the perfect recipe for an almost ideal screen for PC gamers. In this role, the QN70F truly does not disappoint – games look smooth, responsiveness is at a very high level, and everything runs stably.

However, the performance regarding text work is somewhat lacking. At a resolution of 4K and a refresh rate of 144 Hz, there is a noticeable blurriness in the font contours – text may appear slightly smeared, with a slight “layering” of the contours. This is not a problem that undermines the usability of the QN70F as a monitor, but individuals planning to do office work or text editing on this screen should keep this in mind.

When it comes to working with a PC, the Philips MLED920 evokes quite mixed feelings. On one hand, it looks impressive on paper – we have 144 Hz, G-Sync, and FreeSync support, so in terms of gaming on a PC, the television does not disappoint. Anyone looking for a large screen for computer gaming gets a solid package of features here. However, when we try to use it as a typical monitor for everyday work, its limitations quickly become apparent. The fonts do not present themselves well – there is noticeable strong dithering, coloured letters can be jagged, and in the case of very dark text, there are even strange anomalies, as if the panel is losing thin lines and struggling to reproduce them correctly. In short: Yes for PC gaming. For any work and reading text: a definite no.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
74%
68%

As for the VA panel, the viewing angles on the QN70F are typical – meaning rather average. The image quickly loses contrast and saturation when we start looking at the screen from a greater angle. Compared to IPS panels, it performs significantly worse. On the other hand – thanks to this panel, we gain better blacks and higher contrast when viewing straight on, which will be more important for many users than wide visibility from the sides.

The viewing angles in the MLED920 are classic for a VA panel – even a slight deviation from the centre causes the image to start losing colours, contrast diminishes, and the overall picture becomes quite flat and unappealing. There are no miracles here. So, if you're watching films with a larger group and everyone is sitting slightly off to the side, this will be somewhat noticeable. On the other hand, something for something: thanks to this panel, the MLED920 can display a much deeper black than televisions with IPS panels.

TV efficiency during daytime

6.3/10

5.5/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV efficiency during daytime
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV efficiency during daytime
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV efficiency during daytime
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV efficiency during daytime

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips MLED920 / MLED910: 421 cd/m2

Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F: 492 cd/m2

The QN70F handles a bright living room without any issues. The screen has a satin finish that effectively suppresses reflections, so there's no need to immediately draw the curtains to see anything. Even when there's plenty of light in the room – for example, with a window to the side – the picture still looks clear and vibrant. The brightness is also at a solid level. In SDR mode, the television averages around 500 nits, which is more than sufficient for daytime viewing. While it may not reach the levels of top models, in practice – for everyday television watching, sports, or YouTube – it performs very well.

The Philips MLED920 performs quite well in everyday use. The applied satin coating on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and in most moderately sunlit living rooms, it handles unwanted glare adequately. However, it should be noted that this is not a television that dazzles with brightness – the average value in SDR hovers around 450 nits. In very bright rooms, especially with large south-facing windows, the screen does not always manage to cut through the intense daylight. In such situations, it is worth supporting it with at least light curtains, so that viewing comfort is not significantly compromised.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
1110
TPN258E_V058.002.179.041
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV details about the matrix
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV details about the matrix

Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

TV features

7.2/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features

Television Features

The QN70F doesn't forget classic features that still matter to many users. On board, we find, among other things, picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, enabled by the presence of two tuners, teletext, and a "Sound Only" mode – perfect if we want to use the television like a radio. We can easily pair it with headphones or a soundbar via Bluetooth, and the remote control – despite the absence of a numeric keypad – works reliably, allowing us to operate other devices and additionally does not require us to aim at the screen. However, it should be noted that like all new Samsung models, we will not find USB recording functionality here. This is a system limitation that the brand clearly adheres to consistently.

Smart TV QN70F – Tizen

The Tizen system, developed by Samsung for years, is one of the most refined Smart TV interfaces. It is fast, intuitive, and feature-rich. The QN70F supports voice search (also in Polish), wireless screen mirroring from a phone (both via AirPlay and Miracast), as well as integration with watches and other devices in the Samsung ecosystem. All of this is connected by the SmartThings app, which allows you to control hardware, automate tasks, and connect devices in one network. (Not only Samsung brand devices). However, it is not perfect. Tizen is a closed system, so the selection of apps can be somewhat limited – especially in comparison to Google TV. All the major streaming services are in place, but if you use less popular services, it's worth checking before purchasing if they are available in the Samsung store.

Smart TV – Titan OS

Philips MLED920 uses the proprietary Titan OS, which is just starting its journey in the television market and unfortunately, this is evident at every turn. On one hand, we have basic functions – such as AirPlay support or the ability to mirror from a smartphone, but on the other hand, its limitations quickly become apparent. Screen mirroring only works with a phone, but not with a laptop. Voice search? Yes, but it is only supported by Amazon Alexa and only in the languages supported by this assistant. The system operates reasonably quickly, but from time to time it can "fail" and gives the impression of being something underdeveloped that is still evolving.

Classic TV Features

Titan OS also does not spoil users with classic television features. Apart from the hybrid remote control with a numeric keypad – which is indeed backlit and cleverly designed in two modes, it unfortunately works on infrared – there is nothing here that could truly distinguish the MLED920 from its competitors. There's a lack of USB recording or PiP functionality, and such features could be useful in this class. Among the unusual additions, however, there is an analogue output in the form of a jack that allows you to connect headphones or older speakers. It’s a small nod to users who still use older equipment.

Ambilight TV

What certainly draws attention away from the shortcomings of Titan OS is the unique, three-sided Ambilight system. Here Philips still plays in its own league and can impress those who have not encountered this addition before. The colourful backlighting that reacts to the content on the screen gives the viewing experience a unique atmosphere and is something that the competition does not offer in a similar form. It is the Ambilight that is supposed to make other issues – both system and functional – take a back seat.

Playing files from USB

9/10

8.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung QN70F performs well with media playback – it easily runs photos, music, and videos in the most commonly used formats. During tests, it effortlessly opened JPG files, MP4, and subtitles in TXT format, so for most people, this will simply be sufficient. However, there were instances where a few files – despite having the correct extensions – would not play. It may be an issue with a specific version of the system, and the problem might disappear after future updates.

The built-in player in the Philips MLED920 works quite well and manages most popular audio and video files without major issues – exactly as you can see in our test table. Therefore, there are no concerns about typical movie or music formats. We can only criticise its rather selective support for photo formats and some resolutions.

Apps

8.7/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.4/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The Samsung QN70F performs quite mediocrely in terms of sound, which shouldn't come as a surprise considering the exceptionally slim design of the television. The built-in speakers will manage perfectly well during everyday viewing of news or simpler content, but it's hard to talk about any depth or spaciousness of sound here. It's simply a compromise one has to accept when choosing an elegant and thin design over a bulkier casing with a better audio system.

The sound on the Philips MLED920 is unlikely to be the element that impresses you the most. It sounds rather flat, lacking depth and clearer bass, which means that films or concerts do not have that additional layer of immersion that a better audio system can provide. However, it must be acknowledged that the volume is at a really respectable level – the television can reach up to 88 decibels. A significant advantage of the MLED920 is not so much the sound quality itself, but the handling of audio formats. Philips has ensured compatibility with practically all the major standards, including Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Dolby TrueHD 7.1. As a result, if someone decides to connect an external soundbar or amplifier, they will encounter no limitations and will be able to enjoy the full cinema sound experience.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC