Philips PUS8209 vs Samsung Q6F (IPS)

Direct comparison

PUS8209

Q6F

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

5.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.4

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    4.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    6.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    1.8

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    5.9

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    5.8

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Three-sided Ambilight system – a unique backlighting of the wall behind the television that enhances immersion during viewing

  • Low input lag – around 13 ms

  • Includes basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Support for Polish characters and subtitle personalisation – the built-in player allows changing the colour and size of the font

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS – a wide range of supported audio codecs

  • Tizen System: Works quickly, does not lag and

  • Large application library (Netflix, YouTube, HBO, Disney)

  • IPS matrix provides a good image even when you are not sitting directly in front of it

  • Great font readability – good as a large monitor for working with text

  • Basic features for gamers: VRR and ALLM

  • Very low input lag

  • User-friendly remote for seniors: Classic layout with numeric buttons

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Titan OS operating system – limited number of applications

  • Poor brightness (280 nits) – issues with viewing in bright surroundings

  • Poor viewing angles – typical for VA panels,

  • Issues with font rendering

  • A brightness of 250 nits is too low to notice any difference in HDR mode

  • The low contrast of the IPS panel spoils evening film screenings

  • An average brightness of 150 nits during the day makes it hard to see anything in a sunny room

  • No optical output

  • Infrared remote control (requires aiming at the screen)

Our verdict

The Philips PUS8209 is a model that stands out primarily for its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided wall lighting behind the television dynamically adjusts to the picture, adding an extraordinary atmosphere when watching films or playing games. This solution, for which Philips is renowned, makes a difference and could be a great choice for those looking for something more unconventional in everyday use. In terms of picture quality, the television performs quite well, especially in this price range. The VA panel provides solid contrast and decent blacks, which works particularly well in the evening in dimly lit rooms. Watching films in such conditions is genuinely enjoyable, although the screen brightness (280 nits) leaves much to be desired – in bright rooms, the image can appear washed out, and HDR content does not make a significant impression. When it comes to gaming, the PUS8209 also has some advantages. Support for VRR, ALLM, and a low input lag of 13 ms ensures that gameplay is smooth and responsive. Of course, this is not equipment for advanced gamers, but for those who occasionally pick up a controller, it should suffice. The biggest downside is the Titan OS operating system. Many popular applications are lacking, and the interface does not always function as smoothly as one would wish. The remote control, which requires aiming at the television, can be irritating, especially in situations where quick operation is expected. In summary: the Philips PUS8209 is a television that will perform well for basic applications. Ambilight adds uniqueness and enhances the atmosphere during viewing. In everyday use or occasional gaming, it manages, but its limitations – particularly in screen brightness and operating system – may be problematic for more demanding users. If one is looking for simple equipment with an unusual visual addition, this model is worth considering.

Samsung Q6F is a television that is difficult to evaluate through the lens of typical QLED models. We must remember that we are dealing with a budget-friendly proposal aimed at a very specific audience. If you are looking for an inexpensive device with the logo of a well-known manufacturer that simply needs to function, display multimedia, and offer classic remote control functionality with buttons – the Q6F might be an interesting option for you. It is a great choice for a senior citizen or someone who needs a large screen "on the cheap" for everyday television, where the IPS matrix and its good viewing angles truly make a difference. However, we must say this bluntly: the biggest complaint about this model is its very low brightness and poor black levels. These are two foundations on which image quality is built, and here they are simply very fragile. This is definitely not a television on which we would recommend watching HDR content – here, that format exists practically only in name. Although the Q6F has a QLED filter and belongs to the Quantum Dot family, utilising the full potential of this technology is practically impossible, as the device is technically unsuitable for such content. We know that it tempts with its very low price and may appeal to many people who do not have high demands. However, you need to know that the label "QLED" suggesting a premium product is in this case far from what Samsung has accustomed us to in recent years. This is a ticket to the world of Samsung, but in a very basic version.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.6/10

1.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,200:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,200:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,000:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Philips PUS8209 pleasantly surprised us in terms of contrast, which is truly solid for its price range. Thanks to the use of a VA panel, a contrast level of 8000:1 has been achieved, which is considered an excellent result in this price category. In tests using scenes from the film Oblivion, the television performed well, providing visible light separation. Three independent light sources in the test scene were portrayed without significant issues. Similarly, in the case of the film Sicario 2, where the blacks, although not perfect, appear decent enough to allow for the distinction of details in the darker parts of the image. The lack of local dimming technology is noticeable, however, the manufacturer has implemented a "global dimming" function. This mechanism enables the television to automatically darken or brighten the entire screen depending on the content, which somewhat improves the perception of contrast. Philips PUS8209 offers solid contrast and decent results in tests. Although it lacks the precision of local dimming, its capabilities at this price are satisfactory and will meet the needs of most users.

It is here that it is clearly visible where the manufacturer decided to cut costs. The IPS matrix used, despite being supported by QLED technology, highlights issues with a lack of depth in the image. Results at the level of 1000:1 speak for themselves – the black in this model unfortunately resembles grey. One can try to mitigate the situation by turning on the light in the room, preferably placing it directly behind the television, which allows us to somewhat trick our eyesight. However, no matter what is said, the contrast in the Q6F with the IPS panel is simply weak and this will be noticeable in dark scenes.

HDR effect quality

3.8/10

3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.4%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 87.7%, Bt.2020: 65.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

231 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

274 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

93 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

256 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung Q6F (IPS)

Philips PUS8209

Unfortunately, this is where the problems begin. A maximum brightness of 280 nits is definitely too low to feel the true effect of HDR. In practice, the image resembles standard SDR more, so it’s hard to speak of deeper visual experiences. On the positive side, the colour gamut coverage is commendable – 91.4% DCI-P3 is a score that will be sufficient for most films. It must also be said that the image is stable and there are no issues with sudden changes in brightness or colours. Overall, HDR on this television is more of a formality than an actual added value. If we are looking for genuine HDR thrills, this model may not meet expectations.

The Samsung Q6F is, unfortunately, a very dark model. Its peak brightness in HDR does not exceed 250 nits, which is a value that is decidedly too low to even talk about any effect of “high dynamic range,” or HDR. In practice, it’s better to stick to content in SDR format, which simply looks more predictable on this television. Another problem is the global dimming technique – in scenes with a lot of black, the television drastically dims the entire panel to artificially improve the black levels. This causes the image to become even darker, and the brightness can drop below 100 nits. The only consolation is supposed to be the QLED technology, but even here it is average. The layer of quantum dots used is not of the highest quality, as the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette does not exceed 90%. As a result, the colours in HDR content may simply appear under-saturated.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Philips PUS8209 offers many picture modes, but the best of them, without a doubt, is the Filmmaker mode. Despite its proud name, it has its clear problems. In the case of HD content, the white balance is characterised by a strong dominance of red, which causes the picture to be significantly warmer than it should be in reality. The brightness characteristic (gamma), although correct in the mid-tones, has serious issues at the beginning and end of the curve. Drops in the shadows cause a loss of detail in the dark areas, and blowouts in the bright areas make some elements look unnatural.

For high-quality 4K HDR content, the situation reverses. In this case, blue dominates, leading to an artificial enhancement effect, reminiscent of unnatural retail settings. Such an image looks unattractive and inconsistent with the creators' intentions. An additional problem is the EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in HDR materials. It deviates significantly from the reference chart, causing the image to appear too dark, robbing the depth and detail of HDR content.

Against this backdrop, errors in the Color Checker test and deviations in colour palette reproduction are exceptionally large, which further negatively impacts the overall image quality. The Filmmaker mode, although the best among the available options, requires substantial corrections to fully convey the director's vision.

We tested the television in Filmmaker mode, which showed us two completely different facets of this model. Looking at SDR content, we were genuinely shocked at how good this television looks straight out of the box. It was really difficult to find fault with anything here. Despite a slight 'muddiness' in the white balance or somewhat brightened details in the blacks (which directly stem from the design of the IPS panel), the colour errors hovered around a level of '2'. This result is not only surprisingly good but downright amazing, considering the price of this device.

On the other hand, what the Q6F displayed in terms of colours after switching to HDR mode was a very unpleasant surprise. The errors in colour reproduction and palette were so enormous that our charts literally ran out of scale. Of course, since Samsung even in such an affordable model offers very extensive calibration options, we decided to approach the issue professionally and see what could be done during calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.3/10

6.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the white balance for HD and 4K content has significantly improved. Although we have not achieved a perfectly flat characteristic, the effect is definitely better than before. The picture on the television no longer appears artificially warm or excessively cold, which significantly enhances the naturalness of the displayed content. The brightness characteristic (gamma) has also been adjusted – the biggest issues at the beginning and end of the graph have been mitigated. The EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in 4K HDR material, has been stabilised, eliminating problems with excessive dimming of the image. In the colour palette test, some imperfections can still be noticed due to average coverage of the wide colour gamut, which is a limitation of the equipment itself. Nevertheless, the final effect is clearly better than before calibration – the image looks more natural and approaches the expectations of the Filmmaker mode.

After our calibration, the colours in SDR mode looked even better – the result is truly surprising, as colour errors at the '1' level are something generally seen in devices costing several thousand pounds. In this regard, the Q6F is really an excellent screen for everyday television, less demanding series or films. Unfortunately, our intervention in the HDR mode did not bring a noticeable improvement. The television, due to its poor blacks and low coverage of a wide colour gamut, still has significant issues with proper colour saturation, especially reds. This is an example of a device where HDR exists mainly as a label on the box – for everyday use, we definitely recommend watching content in SDR format.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

9/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The Philips PUS8209 presents a decent gradient in bright scenes, where tonal transitions are smooth enough not to be noticeable. Unfortunately, in darker scenes, such as red water, the television clearly struggles. Issues with blending shades and a lack of precision in reproducing subtle colour differences are very apparent here.

Samsung Q6F handles the phenomenon of posterisation very well. In most scenes, the colour transitions are smooth and there are no noticeable problematic "steps" when blending colours. Only in very extreme moments, particularly in scenes with brightness close to pure grey, can light banding be detected. However, to be honest, we personally found the issue of slight clouding (uneven backlighting) and the poor contrast of the IPS panel to be more bothersome than the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The television offers a "Distortion Reduction" feature that effectively improves the gradation of tonal transitions, especially when set to the minimum level. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost – the feature simultaneously smooths out details such as the texture of materials. On the positive side, it is worth noting that the operation of this option does not negatively affect film grain, which remains intact.

As for image scaling (upscaling), the television generates a plastic, soft image that generally looks pleasant. However, in the background, one can sometimes notice issues with aliasing on certain elements, such as branches or fine details, which can lower the quality of reception. Despite these minor imperfections, the overall experience of scaling is satisfactory.

Q6F performs very well in upscaling lower-resolution content to native 4K. The scaling here is surprisingly good, even for such an inexpensive television from the QLED series. The only downside is the situation where we are watching very low-resolution materials, such as 576p (typical for old DVD players) – in which case the image may be slightly cropped. This is due to the fact that the television does not allow the Overscan function to be turned off, which is a typical issue with Samsung devices.

The situation is completely different when it comes to digital processing, specifically the attempt to smooth the image of unwanted artifacts. Here the television completely fails. Although there is a function in the menu called "Noise Reduction," it yields no visible results regardless of the slider setting. The only thing it manages to do is introduce undesired errors in the image. Despite its presence in the system, we definitely do not recommend using it.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

The 60 Hz panel in the Philips PUS8209 is mainly suitable for watching films, but there is still a sense of something missing. The television does not offer any motion smoother that would allow users to adjust the fluidity of the picture to their individual preferences, which can be disappointing for some users.

The 60 Hz panel in the Samsung Q6F is standard for this price range, making it rather average for dynamic sports or gaming. However, when it comes to films, the television performs quite well thanks to the motion smoothing feature. The "Motion Reduction" option allows you to adjust the smoothness of movement to your own preferences – from maintaining a cinematic character to complete fluidity.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

5.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

The Philips PUS8209 offers basic features useful for gamers, such as variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), and a Game Bar that makes managing settings easier.

Unfortunately, due to the 60 Hz panel, the television will not meet the expectations of more demanding gamers who are counting on higher smoothness and image precision. Additionally, this model does not support any HDR mode dedicated to gaming, such as HGiG or Dolby Vision, which further limits its capabilities in this regard.

We're not going to beat around the bush – the Q6F is not a television designed for gamers. Although it features additions like ALLM (automatic low latency mode) and VRR frame synchronisation for consoles, the list of advantages basically ends there. Aside from these basics, the television offers nothing more that would satisfy those who spend a lot of time in front of a console. It’s a great shame that such a useful tool as Game Bar, which allows for quick control of game parameters in Samsung's higher models, is missing here. In terms of gaming, this model is absolutely basic and is only suitable for "casual" gamers.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
11 ms
1080p120
2160p60
13 ms
11 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
11 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The input lag in the Philips PUS8209 is one of its strongest points. With a value of around 13 ms, the television provides a very quick response time, which should please most gamers, both casual and more advanced. This result allows for comfortable gameplay even in dynamic games.

As a consolation for the modest list of features for gamers, it is worth adding that the Q6F has absolutely no issues with input lag. The response to controller movements is instantaneous, and the television does not introduce any additional delays regardless of the resolution we are currently playing in. In this respect, the control is very precise and comfortable, which is a significant advantage in this class of hardware.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

On paper, cooperation with a PC seems promising, especially thanks to support for chroma 4:4:4, which should ensure good font readability and detail reproduction. In practice, however, the television has significant issues with displaying text, particularly on dark backgrounds, where the so-called pixelation is clearly visible, negatively affecting work comfort.

Additionally, the lack of support for technologies such as G-Sync means that the smoothness of gameplay when connected to a PC leaves much to be desired, making this model less attractive for users looking for a television for gaming on a computer.

Although the Q6F is not a screen specifically designed for PC gaming, it deserves praise for how well it handles text rendering. As a monitor for text work, browsing the web, or daily news reading, the television performs exceptionally well. The readability of the text is at a very high level, thanks to the proper implementation of the Chroma 4:4:4 signal and the use of an IPS panel. If you are looking for an affordable, large screen for office work, the Q6F performs really solidly in this regard. Especially since Samsung offers very good integration with the Windows system and built-in Microsoft Office tools.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

5.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
87%
78%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8209 are poor, which is typical for a VA panel. When viewing at an angle, the brightness of the image drops significantly, and the colours lose their depth, which can greatly affect viewing comfort, especially in larger groups or in an unusual setting of the television in relation to the viewer.

The viewing angles are one of the stronger points of the Q6F model, which is directly due to the use of an IPS panel. They are significantly better than those in TVs based on VA panels. This means that the image viewed at an angle remains clear and does not become "washed out" or faded. However, it is worth noting that while the colours look really good, the drop in brightness at wider angles is quite noticeable. Nevertheless, this is a solid performance for people who do not always sit perfectly in front of the screen.

Daytime performance

4.4/10

1.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Average
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung Q6F (IPS): 125 cd/m2

Philips PUS8209: 277 cd/m2

The Philips PUS8209 is equipped with a satin matrix coating, which only moderately reduces reflections, which may be insufficient in brightly lit rooms. However, the biggest problem is the low brightness level of 280 nits. In practice, this means that watching content during the day, especially in strong sunlight, can be a challenge, as the picture appears too dark to ensure comfortable use.

What more can I say – apart from the satin finish of the panel, which does a fairly mediocre job of reducing reflections, the Q6F is such a dark device that it’s not suitable even for moderately lit rooms. A brightness level of 150 nits is simply astronomically low by today’s standards. With such a result, any larger light source in the room will make the image difficult to read. This is definitely not a model for a sunlit living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
QLED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.147.081
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1110.7
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS8209 TV Panel details
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV Panel details

TV features

4.7/10

5.9/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS8209 TV features
Review Philips PUS8209 TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features

The Philips PUS8209 uses the Titan OS operating system, which, while simple to use, remains limited in terms of functionality. The number of available applications is small compared to more developed ecosystems such as Google TV, which can be disappointing for users accustomed to broader capabilities. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay restricts compatibility with Apple devices, reducing the flexibility of the television for content streaming. Although the remote control is interesting, it requires aiming at the screen, which may not appeal to everyone.

The absence of more advanced features, such as PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or programme recording, further limits the device's capabilities in everyday use.

The Philips PUS8209 is a television that draws attention with its interesting solution in the form of a three-sided Ambilight system, which is a dynamic backlighting of the wall behind the television that adapts its colours and intensity to the content displayed on the screen. This effect creates an impression of greater depth of image and enhances immersion, especially in dimly lit rooms. Unfortunately, its potential is limited by the Titan OS operating system, which leaves much to be desired. The limited number of applications and lack of support for popular features such as AirPlay can be a significant drawback for more demanding users. Although Ambilight distinguishes this model from the competition, shortcomings in the operating system greatly affect the overall functionality of the television.

It is really nice that in Samsung televisions – even the most budget-friendly ones – the Tizen system simply "doesn't lag". The speed of operation, although not at the level of the most expensive models, is definitely better than in the case of Google TV at a similar price. Thanks to Tizen, we have access to a truly vast library of applications, AirPlay, and other Smart TV features.

It is worth adding that the remote control included with the Q6F is an older, yet somewhat modernised version of the classic Samsung infrared controller, equipped with a full numeric keypad. Although it operates via infrared, it has many buttons, which might appeal to older users watching traditional television – it simply makes channel switching easier. We will also find a clear EPG interface, teletext, and support for Bluetooth headphones. It sounds a bit like the fulfilment of a senior's dream, and there is some truth in that.

However, we must note a serious lack regarding connections: in this model, we will not find an optical output for audio devices. Only the HDMI eARC connection is available, which can be a significant hassle if we have an external audio system.

Apps

6.7/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Philips PUS8209 performs well in everyday use. It handles Polish characters in subtitles without any issues and allows for the adjustment of colour and font size, which significantly enhances the comfort of using this feature. More demanding users may notice some shortcomings in the supported file formats; however, for most applications in daily use, this player should be completely sufficient.

When it comes to multimedia support from external media, the Samsung Q6F performs exceptionally well, especially considering that it is a closed system. The television has no issues with most popular video, audio, or photo formats (EVEN HEIC!). The media player operates stably and quickly loads content from USB drives or network servers. It is a solid device for browsing your own film archives or home photo galleries.

Sound

5/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound in the Philips PUS8209 can be described as average, typical for televisions in this price range. The speakers with a power of 2x10 W do not offer exceptional quality or depth; however, they are sufficient for everyday television viewing. On the positive side, it is worth noting the wide range of supported audio codecs, such as Dolby Atmos and DTS, which can significantly enhance audio quality when combined with external sound systems, such as soundbars or home cinema sets.

When it comes to sound, the Samsung Q6F plays... well, flat. However, at the same time, the sound is clear and loud enough that it is perfectly suitable for listening to the news or regular television. The voices of the presenters are understandable and do not fade into the background. However, if someone cares about even decent experiences when watching films, we definitely recommend purchasing a soundbar. Even the cheapest model from the Korean manufacturer's range will make a huge difference here and save the situation.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

0dBC (Max)

75dBC