Philips PUS8079 vs TCL P7L / P79L

Direct comparison

P7L / P79L

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

4.6

6.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    5.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.9

    6.0

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    5.7

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    7.3

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    2.6

    5.2

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    7.0

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.1

    6.2

Advantages

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Excellent smoothness of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS audio

  • Good contrast thanks to the VA panel

  • Rich colours: QLED (PFS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Supports audio formats Dolby Atmos and DTS:X

  • Extensive gaming features: VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

  • 120 Hz support at lower resolutions

  • Google TV with a wide selection of apps

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low display brightness

  • No Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of applications

  • Low brightness

  • Poor viewing angles

  • Average sound quality

Our verdict

Philips PUS8079 is currently the cheapest model from the manufacturer, featuring multicolour Ambilight backlighting, which has a significant fan base. Operating with a small budget for the device, this will certainly be an advantage and a considerable added value. However, by opting for such a budget, we must also reckon with certain compromises that will be inherent in all televisions of this class. This television is primarily dedicated to those who mostly watch television during the day. Why? Primarily, the main reason is the contrast results, which, for a VA panel, were extremely low, as well as the television's luminance, hovering around 200 nits. Such brightness suggests that it will not be suitable for materials with a broad colour palette, namely streaming platforms at the highest packages. However, it is also worth noting the positives of the television, as it would be unfair not to point them out. This refers mainly to the fairly high tonal fidelity in materials significantly exceeding the television's capabilities and smooth gradation. The latter is the strongest point of the tested television, as it is practically hard to find fault with it, and if one were to try, it would be nitpicking. If we occasionally connect a console, we can expect low input lag, allowing for comfortable Sunday gaming. The contentious issue is the operating system itself. It is incredibly simple and sufficient for those who only need YouTube or Netflix, although in every other case, it may prove inadequate. So who is Philips PUS8079 for? Primarily for those looking for something that distinguishes a unit in this price range. And that something is certainly Ambilight.

TCL P7L is a successful budget television that shows you can get more than just a screen for basic viewing for a modest sum. It does not match pricier Mini LED or OLED models, but in its class it has a lot to offer. The VA panel delivers decent blacks and contrast, so during an evening session the picture does not look as flat as on many cheap IPS models. After calibration the colours are also good. For watching films and series it is a solid base, and Google TV provides access to a wide range of apps and streaming services. The biggest surprise is its gaming capabilities. The P7L responds quickly to controller input, supports VRR and switches automatically to game mode. There is even Dolby Vision Gaming and a Game Bar with settings at your fingertips. What is more, reducing the resolution to 1080p or 1440p allows you to play at 120 Hz. In 4K you are limited to 60 Hz, so you must choose between greater detail and smoother motion, but it is good that at this price you have that choice. TCL also handles lower-quality sources well. Lower-resolution material looks acceptable, and the tonal transition smoothing actually helps reduce visible banding between shades. The way it presents HDR is also commendable. The TV sensibly adapts content to its capabilities and tries to preserve highlight detail instead of turning it into blown-out whites. Dolby Vision helps here too, often delivering noticeably better results than HDR10. That does not mean the HDR effect itself is awe-inspiring. The biggest limitation of the P7L is brightness. Small highlights and reflections do not have the punch you see on more expensive screens, even if their detail remains visible. For the same reason the TV is less well suited to a very sunlit living room. It performs much better in a moderately lit room. So the P7L has its limitations, but it is hard to deny its strong value for money. It is suitable for everyday viewing, does not restrict you in app choice and offers surprising freedom in games. If you are looking for an inexpensive television and can accept its flaws, the TCL P7L is a model worth considering.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

4.3/10

6.1/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review TCL P7L / P79L Contrast and black detail

Result

7,550:1

Review TCL P7L / P79L Contrast and black detail

Result

7,350:1

Review TCL P7L / P79L Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review TCL P7L / P79L Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review TCL P7L / P79L Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The Philips PUS8079 television features a VA panel. It is worth noting that the size we tested is 43", as this manufacturer often changes the panel depending on the size. Although this type of panel should provide at least good blacks, since we are dealing with a very budget-friendly unit, the results are rather predictable. Results at around 2300:1 are among the lowest for this type of panel. More advanced units achieve results that are 2-3 times better in this regard. However, the current state of affairs should not overly surprise us, as we are dealing with a device that is very, very budget-friendly. We should also mention that in this case we have direct backlighting (Direct), whose only advantage is the uniformity of the backlight. Unfortunately, it has not been divided into any zones, which is not surprising given the low class of the device. On the positive side, light separation was noted in the test with the film "Oblivion".

The TCL P7L can surprise with quite respectable black levels, mainly thanks to its VA panel. The panel itself offers contrast of around 4500:1, which is clearly better than in typical IPS screens. The TV also uses global backlight control, so in darker scenes it can push black levels even lower, and in our measurements it achieved results that exceeded the panel's own capabilities.

However, this is not the local dimming found on Mini LED TVs. The P7L cannot dim small parts of the image independently, so when a bright element appears on screen the entire backlight has to operate at a similar level. In more demanding scenes the difference compared with models that use zoned dimming becomes apparent quite quickly, and in a completely dark room blacks can tend towards navy tones. Despite these limitations, we assess the P7L's overall contrast positively, especially given the segment it occupies.

HDR effect quality

2.9/10

4.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 91.6%, Bt.2020: 70.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review TCL P7L / P79L Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review TCL P7L / P79L Brightness measurement

Result

300 nit

Review TCL P7L / P79L Brightness measurement

Result

368 nit

Review TCL P7L / P79L Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Review TCL P7L / P79L Brightness measurement

Result

347 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL P7L / P79L

Philips PUS8079

The maximum brightness in content with a wide tonal range at a level of 202 nits is extremely low and, in practice, does not allow for watching films and series on streaming platforms in the highest quality. It is worth mentioning that in this case, the use of the HDR format equipped with dynamic metadata will not help either. Why won't it help? Because the only such format implemented in the television is HDR10+, which is extremely unpopular, and films recorded in this format are scarce. It is also worth noting that PUS8079 utilises WLED backlighting, which unfortunately is not the best solution, resulting in a coverage of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut of only 80%. The result of this situation is significantly less intense colours in HDR content.

The biggest limitation of the TCL P7L in HDR is simply brightness. The TV does not have much luminance headroom, so strong highlights, the sun or small light sources can't clearly 'pop' out of the picture. As a result, even well-produced HDR material looks fairly restrained and, in terms of dynamics, is closer to good SDR than to what brighter models show. That does not mean the P7L completely fails at HDR. The issue is primarily a lack of backlight power.

Looking at colours, the situation is a little better. The TV covers around 91% of the DCI-P3 gamut and about 68% of the wide BT.2020 colour space, so for this price class the colour range is quite respectable. TCL markets this model as QLED, although the nature of the solution used is closer to backlighting that uses a PFS phosphor than to a classic quantum-dot layer. What matters most to the viewer, however, is the effect: more saturated colours are on offer.

Factory color reproduction

1.8/10

5.4/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision was "Film". Admittedly, it was the best among the pre-defined modes, although it had significant discrepancies between what the film's author wanted to convey and what the tested television displayed. Both in SDR and HDR materials (though to a lesser extent in the latter), the white balance, which is the most fundamental element responsible for image purity, turned out to be somewhat of a repeat of the vivid mode, with the blue tint known from displays on shop shelves. Moving directly to SDR materials and what is responsible for contrast, namely gamma, we see that it is significantly reduced. This leads to cutting down on an already limited contrast range and brightening the entire image. In the EOTF curve, which is responsible for the increase in brightness pace in HDR materials, we observe a sharp drop below the reference line, which, given the limited light output of the television, had a significant impact on the perception of these contents, which were even darker. We will not separate the assessments of the colours themselves, as in both cases they achieved astronomical deltaE values, being simply completely different from what they should be.

In Film mode the TCL P7L performs quite respectably without major changes to the settings, particularly with ordinary SDR material. White balance is relatively even, though as brightness increases there is a slight rise in red and blue and a touch too little green. This does not, however, produce a strongly visible tint and most colours remain close to their reference points. The Colour Checker confirms this, with a large portion of errors falling below the level that should be particularly noticeable during normal viewing. We have more reservations about the gamma response. In the darkest parts of the image the TV runs it noticeably above the reference value, so some shadow detail can be a little too subdued. The characteristic then calms down and across much of the range it is close to the intended behaviour. As a result SDR generally looks natural, but in dark scenes the P7L can lose some subtlety.

In HDR the factory calibration is less precise. As brightness increases the excess of blue becomes more pronounced, which can make the image look cooler than it should. The number of larger colour deviations also grows, particularly in brighter hues. As for the EOTF curve itself, it is handled fairly conservatively, with the TV showing the image darker than the reference across much of the range. For such an inexpensive model, the factory Film mode settings are not bad.

Color reproduction after calibration

4.8/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Fortunately, Philips implements advanced image correction tools in all its televisions. SDR materials benefited the most here, and the enormous deltaE errors were significantly corrected, both white balance and gamma underwent considerable reshaping. Although one cannot speak of a reference image here, it is definitely better, and films or series can be watched without causing headaches, and above all, eye strain. Naturally, HDR materials, due to the very low luminance of the television, could not be corrected to the same extent as those with a standard colour palette; however, the EOTF curve and white balance were roughly straightened out. Unfortunately, that was all we managed to squeeze out of our unit, although it should be noted that each unit is different and has completely different errors, smaller or larger.

After calibration the TCL P7L can deliver a genuinely pleasant picture, especially with conventional SDR material. We managed to even out the white balance very well, and the gamma curve now tracks close to the target value of 2.4. This is also reflected in the colour measurements: most errors have fallen noticeably, and in everyday viewing it is hard to point to any obvious inaccuracies. Films, series, YouTube and ordinary broadcast TV therefore look more natural, without unnecessary warmth or a cool tint. For a model in this price bracket the SDR performance is really very good.

With HDR the situation becomes more complicated. Calibration helped improve the white balance and tidy up some deviations, but here the panel's limitations become increasingly apparent. The P7L has relatively low brightness and cannot maintain adequate luminance for more saturated colours, so some errors remain even after careful tuning. In other words, settings can improve the way the TV interprets the signal, but they cannot overcome its physical limits. That is why calibration makes most sense for this model primarily in SDR.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

It seems that the fluidity of tonal transitions will be the greatest advantage of the tested television. Practically in each of the scenes, they were at a very satisfactory level. The only moments where it is insufficient are in dark scenes, but even in these areas, it is quite good, and the overall experience can still be rated very positively, especially considering the price of the tested device. An issue not related to the fluidity of tonal transitions, but clearly visible in the pictures, is the noticeable backlight bleed in the corners. This is a matter of the technology itself, but it is worth bearing in mind that these cheaper units may be more prone to a visible effect.

The smoothness of tonal transitions on the TCL P7L is quite good, but not in every scene. In brighter scenes the television performs very well, because changes between successive shades are gentle, and on the sky, bright walls or subtle gradients it's hard to spot anything that would noticeably disrupt viewing. It becomes worse in the darker areas of the image. It is there that visible joins between colours and successive grey levels appear more often. In dark scenes you can therefore notice characteristic banding or more pronounced 'steps' where the transition should be smoother. It's not an issue all the time, but with weaker source material or scenes with lots of mid-tones it can stand out.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

We will return once more to the issue of tonal transitions but in the context of the overall improvement of image quality. As we can observe in the photograph on the left side, the enhancement function for gradation works brilliantly. Moreover, it offers several settings, and each of them, even the lowest one, provides beneficial effects, and what’s more, it does not soften the effect of film grain. We will reiterate that this function is the greatest advantage of the tested television.

Next, we will take a look at image scaling. Here, the tested television performed worse. We can primarily notice severely jagged fine details and a characteristic white halo around the figures. One must not forget about the considerable artificial sharpening of the image.

In this respect the TCL P7L performs surprisingly well, especially for such an inexpensive TV. The banding-reduction feature, which in many budget models does little or nothing, actually manages to improve the picture here. It does not remove all banding entirely, but it can noticeably reduce posterisation and make more challenging gradients look more natural. At this price point that’s a genuinely pleasant surprise. Upscaling itself also performs well. Lower-resolution material is scaled correctly, without over-sharpening or adding artificial outlines around objects. Of course the P7L won’t turn a very poor source into a 4K-quality image, but for regular TV the result is simply solid. For a model in this class there is little to criticise.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.2/10

5.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

This paragraph, unlike the others, will be extremely short. The reason for this state of affairs is the lack of implementation of even the most basic motion smoothing function, which was to be expected, considering the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, which in itself will not have the best sharpness under the sun. This type of panel is primarily associated with high contrast, which goes hand in hand with quite slow response times, as we can clearly read from the matrix analysis results. As you can see, from the photos taken in quick motion, the image is typically blurred for this type of panel. Although it will not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports, keeping in mind the less than optimal sharpness in motion. It is worth mentioning that movies will be characterised by judder, as the television does not have any, even the simplest, motion smoother.

The TCL P7L uses a panel with a native 60 Hz refresh rate at 4K resolution, and that's how it should be regarded in everyday use. When watching films the TV mainly offers frame interpolation, so it can smooth motion and reduce the characteristic judder, but it does not deliver the fluidity typical of true 120 Hz panels.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

6.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8079 offers only the most basic support for gaming in the form of ALLM, VRR, and a Game Bar. The most important information is that thanks to the implementation of the feature responsible for dynamic frequency changing, the picture is actually quite smooth for this price range and does not suffer from tearing.

A slightly greater nod towards gamers is the introduction of the Game Bar, allowing for real-time editing of settings. This means we won't have to exit the game to make any changes to the picture. Importantly, it has not been stripped of options known from higher models. Thus, we will find features such as shadow enhancement for better visibility in dark areas and a colour filter for players with visual impairments.

For such an inexpensive TV, the P7L has quite a lot to offer gamers. It has ALLM, VRR, Dolby Vision for gaming, and TCL also includes its Game Bar, which lets you quickly check the key information or change some settings without leaving the game. Not everything is perfect, though, because HGiG doesn’t work here as it should, but at this price point it’s hard to complain about the feature set. The most interesting part starts when you give up 4K. At that resolution the TV runs at up to 60 Hz, but at 1440p and 1080p it can display at 120 Hz. And that’s not just a line in the specs. In fast-paced games that support that frame rate you can really notice the improvement in smoothness, so if you value smoother motion more than maximum image detail, that mode can make a lot of sense. Of course, that doesn’t turn the P7L into a proper 120 Hz TV. Even so, those extra modes are exactly what make the P7L perform very well for gaming.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
13 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV

The results of input lag measurements in the Philips PUS8079 are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will certainly appreciate the efforts of the manufacturer, which ensure that a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR has only 13 ms of latency, which is practically unnoticeable even in online games.

In terms of latency the TCL P7L performs very well. With a 60 Hz signal the input lag is about 13 ms, regardless of whether you’re playing in SDR, HDR or Dolby Vision. That’s already a level at which the delay should be practically imperceptible during normal gameplay. It gets even better when you switch the TV to 120 Hz mode at a lower resolution. Then the input lag falls to about 9 ms, which nicely complements the modes described earlier. For gamers, that’s another argument that, despite the P7L’s budget nature, it is fairly well prepared in this respect.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
14ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

After connecting the television to the computer and wishing to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 14 ms, which is practically unnoticeable on the mouse-screen-eye line. Unfortunately, the readability of the fonts is at a very low level, which practically excludes the use of Philips PUS8079 as a monitor. Why? If you take a closer look at the picture of the grey text, you will notice the phenomenon of so-called dithering. It is clearly visible that not all subpixels are illuminated on the adjacent pixels, while all should be active during the display of grey. Therefore, the text will be unbearably blurry and will effectively hinder work.

The TCL P7L is probably not the first choice for office work. The TV correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so text itself remains fairly sharp, but the BGR subpixel layout causes some issues with its appearance. On the vertical edges of letters you can notice small artefacts and characteristic "dots" that can be distracting when sitting close to the screen. For occasional browsing or working with documents this isn't a major problem, but as a monitor for daily text work the P7L performs rather averagely.

It looks much better for PC gaming. Low input lag, support for G-Sync and VRR mean the TV works well with the graphics card, and at lower resolutions you can also make use of 120 Hz. In 4K we're still limited to 60 Hz, but if the computer is intended mainly for gaming the P7L makes much more sense in that role than as a typical work monitor.

Viewing angles

3.8/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
41%
84%

The biggest and most common flaw of VA panels is their viewing angles. This particularly applies to units without angle coatings, which would make a significant difference in this regard. Interestingly, the tested hero performed considerably better than, for instance, the PML9009 we recently evaluated. Nevertheless, even a slight deviation from the axis leads to a strong degradation of colours and a drop in contrast.

Viewing angles on the TCL P7L are rather poor, which is typical for a VA panel. It is precisely because of that panel that the TV offers higher contrast and better blacks, but the price for that is a noticeable fall in image quality when you view the screen from the side. You only have to move a little off axis for colours to start losing saturation and for blacks to turn greyer. For that reason the P7L performs best when you are sitting as directly in front of the screen as possible. On a larger sofa and when watching with several people, the seats at the sides will be noticeably less comfortable.

Daytime performance

2.6/10

5.2/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Poor
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

TCL P7L / P79L: 364 cd/m2

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

In our test sequence, there was also an opportunity to check the performance of the television during daytime viewing. Moreover, we suggest such an operational scenario, considering the insufficient contrast. However, returning to the point: the application of the satin coating yielded poor results, which, combined with the low luminance of the television across all models, effectively disqualifies it for viewing in a sunny room.

By day the TCL P7L copes quite well, although much depends on the TV’s position relative to windows. The screen’s satin coating disperses reflections fairly effectively, so under normal living-room lighting the picture stays readable and doesn’t immediately turn into a mirror. Black levels also look good, and in daylight the blacks don’t lose too much depth. The limitation, however, is brightness. Around 360 nits is enough for normal viewing in a moderately bright room, but with strong sunlight falling directly on the screen the P7L starts to lose out to its surroundings. It will therefore be fine for a typical living room, but if the TV is to sit opposite a large window or you mainly watch in a very bright room, it’s worth bearing that in mind.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
v8-0008t01-lf1v534.002065
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS8079 TV Panel details
Review TCL P7L / P79L TV Panel details

Philips PUS8079

TCL P7L / P79L

TV features

4.7/10

7/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Poor
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS8079 TV features
Review Philips PUS8079 TV features
Review TCL P7L / P79L TV features
Review TCL P7L / P79L TV features
Review TCL P7L / P79L TV features
Review TCL P7L / P79L TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    No
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

It is impossible not to mention the biggest distinguishing feature of the manufacturer's televisions first. We are of course talking about the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which placed on the rear casing of the device projects colours adapted to what is happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater experience of immersion. The operating system responsible for the television's functionality is Philips's proprietary system charmingly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed and limited in terms of application resources than in the case of televisions from this manufacturer based on the GoogleTV system. Besides the lack of significant applications, its closed nature is also manifested in another way. We will not be able to perform basic tasks such as programming recordings or recording to USB. Those using devices from Apple may also feel disappointed by the lack of AirPlay functionality, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is the option to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the television's menu. It is worth mentioning that the possibility to connect headphones exists, but only wired ones. If we plug them in, we can also play sound from the television's speakers. It should also be added that the television is controlled via IR, not Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient in these times.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts", especially when we are aware users needing and using many streaming platforms. This is rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, namely Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

Smart TV

The TCL P7L runs on Google TV and that is definitely one of this model’s stronger points. The system provides access to virtually all popular streaming apps, and it also supports AirPlay, casting from other devices and voice search, including Polish. The interface itself performs decently, it isn’t as fast as on more expensive sets, but for everyday use it shouldn’t be particularly irritating.

TV features

When it comes to more traditional features the P7L is clearly a simpler television. It lacks recording to USB, scheduling recordings and picture-in-picture, so people used to those extras on older TVs may miss them. What remains are the basics: such as teletext, an audio-only mode, Bluetooth headphone support and the option to play audio simultaneously through the TV speakers and headphones. The remote uses radio signals, so you don’t have to point it directly at the screen, which is simply handy in everyday use.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.7/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
Yes
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
No
12 Mpix
No
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8079 offers quite a wide range of capabilities, but it also has its limitations. It plays virtually all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, the issues lie in the absence of the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate and support for .sub files, which are quite popular. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, which is used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it cannot be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no possibility of expanding the functionalities, which means we are left with what the manufacturer has prepared.

The built-in media player in the TCL P7L performs quite well. The TV handles most common video and subtitle formats and also easily plays 4K content encoded with newer codecs. It's perfectly adequate for occasional viewing of videos from a USB flash drive or external drive, and in that respect there's little to complain about. What proved most annoying, however, was displaying photos. The P7L did not always open higher-resolution files correctly and behaved somewhat selectively: some large photos worked, others did not. So if you plan to frequently browse photos on the TV straight from a camera or phone, it's worth bearing in mind.

Sound

5.1/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The best thing that can be said about the sound system in Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. There is practically a lack of midtones and bass. However, the high tones stand out in an unpleasant way. Interestingly, it features a complete set of the most important audio codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio. As a result, connecting our home theatre system will be just a formality.

The sound on the TCL P7L is fairly conventional for a budget TV. The speakers can get quite loud and dialogue is clear, but they lack depth and, above all, bass. For regular TV, YouTube or news that setup is more than adequate, but in films and music you’ll quickly notice the sound is rather flat and thin. On the plus side, it supports a wide range of formats, including Dolby Atmos and DTS. However, the TV itself can’t turn those into a full surround effect, so if you want a more powerful sound, especially in the low end, a soundbar is definitely the better option.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

89dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy