Philips PUS8079 vs LG UT8100 (IPS)

Direct compare

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

4.6

6.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    5.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.9

    5.4

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    5.7

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    2.6

    4.6

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    8.3

  • Apps

    7.0

    9.7

  • Sound quality

    5.1

    6.0

Advantages

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Excellent smoothness of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS audio

  • Good viewing angles

  • Intuitive WebOS system with broad access to applications

  • Magic Remote

  • Suitable for occasional gaming - low input lag, ALLM, HGiG

  • USB recording function from built-in tuners

  • Smooth image scaling – good reproduction of lower resolution materials

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low display brightness

  • No Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of applications

  • Average brightness - 350 nits

  • Tragic contrast

  • No Dolby Vision

Our verdict

Philips PUS8079 is currently the cheapest model from the manufacturer, featuring multicolour Ambilight backlighting, which has a significant fan base. Operating with a small budget for the device, this will certainly be an advantage and a considerable added value. However, by opting for such a budget, we must also reckon with certain compromises that will be inherent in all televisions of this class. This television is primarily dedicated to those who mostly watch television during the day. Why? Primarily, the main reason is the contrast results, which, for a VA panel, were extremely low, as well as the television's luminance, hovering around 200 nits. Such brightness suggests that it will not be suitable for materials with a broad colour palette, namely streaming platforms at the highest packages. However, it is also worth noting the positives of the television, as it would be unfair not to point them out. This refers mainly to the fairly high tonal fidelity in materials significantly exceeding the television's capabilities and smooth gradation. The latter is the strongest point of the tested television, as it is practically hard to find fault with it, and if one were to try, it would be nitpicking. If we occasionally connect a console, we can expect low input lag, allowing for comfortable Sunday gaming. The contentious issue is the operating system itself. It is incredibly simple and sufficient for those who only need YouTube or Netflix, although in every other case, it may prove inadequate. So who is Philips PUS8079 for? Primarily for those looking for something that distinguishes a unit in this price range. And that something is certainly Ambilight.

LG UT8100 is a model that does not try to pretend to be more than it is. Simple, functional, and performs well for everyday use. Its greatest asset is the WebOS system – intuitive, fast, and rich in applications. With such a background, using Netflix or YouTube is hassle-free, and navigating the menu is a matter of moments. The Magic Remote adds even more convenience, as it works somewhat like a mouse – just point at the screen and click what we want. Voice control in Polish? It works flawlessly and we can confidently say that it is the best when it comes to our native language. One of the more interesting features is the ability to record to USB. It may seem like a small thing, but it can be useful if we don't always have time to watch programmes live. Surprisingly, the television also handles scaling lower-quality content quite well – standard television channels look decent. It is also suitable for gaming, although rather for those who are not avid gamers. Thanks to the low input lag and ALLM and HGiG features, gaming is smooth, and the image is responsive enough. Sure, the 60 Hz panel doesn’t allow for miracles, but it is certainly sufficient for occasional sessions. Of course, UT8100 is not for demanding cinephiles. The lack of Dolby Vision and HDR10+ means that HDR content does not look as good as it could. Brightness and contrast are also rather average, which is particularly noticeable in the evenings, in dark scenes – blacks are not deep, causing details to easily get lost. LG UT8100 is a solid television for those looking for simple equipment for everyday use. It has a user-friendly system, a functional remote, and several useful options like recording to USB. If we do not care about the highest picture quality and are looking for something to watch television on, this model performs quite well.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

4.3/10

1.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,100:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS8079 television features a VA panel. It is worth noting that the size we tested is 43", as this manufacturer often changes the panel depending on the size. Although this type of panel should provide at least good blacks, since we are dealing with a very budget-friendly unit, the results are rather predictable. Results at around 2300:1 are among the lowest for this type of panel. More advanced units achieve results that are 2-3 times better in this regard. However, the current state of affairs should not overly surprise us, as we are dealing with a device that is very, very budget-friendly. We should also mention that in this case we have direct backlighting (Direct), whose only advantage is the uniformity of the backlight. Unfortunately, it has not been divided into any zones, which is not surprising given the low class of the device. On the positive side, light separation was noted in the test with the film "Oblivion".

The LG UT8100 television is equipped with an IPS panel, which unfortunately cannot provide satisfactory contrast and black levels. In the tested scenes, such as from the film Sicario 2, the black appears more like silvery ash than deep tar. The lack of local dimming causes details in the dark areas of the image to merge, and the screen looks quite dull in poorly lit rooms. For users seeking deep blacks and vivid contrast, the IPS panel in this model will be disappointing. In this category, the television performs very poorly.

HDR effect quality

2.7/10

3.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 82.0%, Bt.2020: 60.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

285 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

238 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

319 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

HDR luminance chart:

LG UT8100 (IPS)

Philips PUS8079

The maximum brightness in content with a wide tonal range at a level of 202 nits is extremely low and, in practice, does not allow for watching films and series on streaming platforms in the highest quality. It is worth mentioning that in this case, the use of the HDR format equipped with dynamic metadata will not help either. Why won't it help? Because the only such format implemented in the television is HDR10+, which is extremely unpopular, and films recorded in this format are scarce. It is also worth noting that PUS8079 utilises WLED backlighting, which unfortunately is not the best solution, resulting in a coverage of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut of only 80%. The result of this situation is significantly less intense colours in HDR content.

Unfortunately, the LG UT8100 television does not meet expectations in the HDR effect category. With a peak brightness of only 300 nits on the luminance chart, it is well below the required value to fully enjoy the HDR effects. In practice, the image resembles SDR quality more than true HDR, which is particularly evident in demanding high-contrast scenes. The coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette is only 82%, further limiting the ability to present vibrant and rich colours. Instead of impressive visual experiences, we receive a muted and lacklustre image. For those looking for a television to fully utilise HDR content, the LG UT8100 model proves to be quite disappointing.

Factory color reproduction

1.8/10

5.5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision was "Film". Admittedly, it was the best among the pre-defined modes, although it had significant discrepancies between what the film's author wanted to convey and what the tested television displayed. Both in SDR and HDR materials (though to a lesser extent in the latter), the white balance, which is the most fundamental element responsible for image purity, turned out to be somewhat of a repeat of the vivid mode, with the blue tint known from displays on shop shelves. Moving directly to SDR materials and what is responsible for contrast, namely gamma, we see that it is significantly reduced. This leads to cutting down on an already limited contrast range and brightening the entire image. In the EOTF curve, which is responsible for the increase in brightness pace in HDR materials, we observe a sharp drop below the reference line, which, given the limited light output of the television, had a significant impact on the perception of these contents, which were even darker. We will not separate the assessments of the colours themselves, as in both cases they achieved astronomical deltaE values, being simply completely different from what they should be.

The Filmmaker Mode in LG UT8100, although theoretically the best for watching films, has significant flaws. The biggest problem is the white balance – drops in blue colour cause a noticeable yellowing of the image, evident in both HD and 4K content. These errors are confirmed by the measurement results in the Colour Checker test, which indicate significant deviations in colour reproduction.

Regarding brightness characteristics, both HD and 4K content feature a substantial tonal boost. The gamma curve in both cases remains significantly below the reference value of 2.4, leading to excessive brightening of darker elements of the image. A similar issue is noticeable in the EOTF curve – for 4K content, the television struggles with properly managing brightness, which results in problems with screen brightness. This means that the factory settings of this model require significant adjustments to achieve better image quality.

Color reproduction after calibration

4.8/10

8/10

Fortunately, Philips implements advanced image correction tools in all its televisions. SDR materials benefited the most here, and the enormous deltaE errors were significantly corrected, both white balance and gamma underwent considerable reshaping. Although one cannot speak of a reference image here, it is definitely better, and films or series can be watched without causing headaches, and above all, eye strain. Naturally, HDR materials, due to the very low luminance of the television, could not be corrected to the same extent as those with a standard colour palette; however, the EOTF curve and white balance were roughly straightened out. Unfortunately, that was all we managed to squeeze out of our unit, although it should be noted that each unit is different and has completely different errors, smaller or larger.

After calibrating the Filmmaker Mode, the gamma has been aligned to practically ideal, reference values, which has significantly improved the overall tonal characteristics of HD content. 4K HDR content also looks better, although certain issues are still visible at the extreme ends of the graph, where the curve deviates from perfection. The EOTF curve performs worse, as the television has difficulty maintaining appropriate brightness values. As a result, the image in some scenes may be overly bright or slightly dimmed, which is due to the very design of the device. Nevertheless, the calibration has brought considerable improvement, especially for HD content, where tonal balance and colour reproduction are now at a much higher level.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

9/10

It seems that the fluidity of tonal transitions will be the greatest advantage of the tested television. Practically in each of the scenes, they were at a very satisfactory level. The only moments where it is insufficient are in dark scenes, but even in these areas, it is quite good, and the overall experience can still be rated very positively, especially considering the price of the tested device. An issue not related to the fluidity of tonal transitions, but clearly visible in the pictures, is the noticeable backlight bleed in the corners. This is a matter of the technology itself, but it is worth bearing in mind that these cheaper units may be more prone to a visible effect.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in LG UT8100 is at a very high level. The colour gradation is almost perfect, and the transitions between shades are smooth and free of visible seams. This is definitely one of the model's stronger points. Unfortunately, the unevenness of the panel's backlighting draws attention, which can be noticeable in more homogeneous scenes, especially in the darker parts of the image. Although the gradation itself looks great, the unevenness of the panel slightly detracts from the overall impression of quality.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

7.3/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

We will return once more to the issue of tonal transitions but in the context of the overall improvement of image quality. As we can observe in the photograph on the left side, the enhancement function for gradation works brilliantly. Moreover, it offers several settings, and each of them, even the lowest one, provides beneficial effects, and what’s more, it does not soften the effect of film grain. We will reiterate that this function is the greatest advantage of the tested television.

Next, we will take a look at image scaling. Here, the tested television performed worse. We can primarily notice severely jagged fine details and a characteristic white halo around the figures. One must not forget about the considerable artificial sharpening of the image.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is also correct, although the effect depends on the settings. The update has improved the performance of the smooth gradation function, smoothing transitions better than before, but it has introduced minor issues with detail loss, e.g. on textures.

The image scaling on LG UT8100 performs very well. The image looks decent, without significant issues with edge aliasing. Details are preserved at a satisfactory level, which makes lower resolution materials look truly solid on this television. This allows users to enjoy watching older content without noticeable flaws in quality.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.2/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

This paragraph, unlike the others, will be extremely short. The reason for this state of affairs is the lack of implementation of even the most basic motion smoothing function, which was to be expected, considering the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, which in itself will not have the best sharpness under the sun. This type of panel is primarily associated with high contrast, which goes hand in hand with quite slow response times, as we can clearly read from the matrix analysis results. As you can see, from the photos taken in quick motion, the image is typically blurred for this type of panel. Although it will not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports, keeping in mind the less than optimal sharpness in motion. It is worth mentioning that movies will be characterised by judder, as the television does not have any, even the simplest, motion smoother.

LG UT8100, equipped with a 60 Hz panel, is particularly suited for those watching films. The television offers the TruMotion system with de-judder effect adjustment, allowing you to customise the smoothness of the image – from more choppy to exceptionally smooth, resembling a soap opera effect, depending on the user's preferences.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8079 offers only the most basic support for gaming in the form of ALLM, VRR, and a Game Bar. The most important information is that thanks to the implementation of the feature responsible for dynamic frequency changing, the picture is actually quite smooth for this price range and does not suffer from tearing.

A slightly greater nod towards gamers is the introduction of the Game Bar, allowing for real-time editing of settings. This means we won't have to exit the game to make any changes to the picture. Importantly, it has not been stripped of options known from higher models. Thus, we will find features such as shadow enhancement for better visibility in dark areas and a colour filter for players with visual impairments.

LG UT8100 offers basic features for gamers, such as ALLM and Game Bar, which makes access to settings easier. The television also supports HGiG, which improves image quality in HDR games. Unfortunately, the lack of support for Dolby Vision and VRR limits the capabilities of the device, as does the 60 Hz panel, which excludes support for 120 Hz resolution. This model is more suitable for less demanding gaming applications.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
10 ms
1080p120
2160p60
14 ms
10 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
10 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The results of input lag measurements in the Philips PUS8079 are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will certainly appreciate the efforts of the manufacturer, which ensure that a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR has only 13 ms of latency, which is practically unnoticeable even in online games.

LG UT8100 achieves an impressively low input lag of 10 ms, which is an excellent result, especially for gamers. As a result, this television provides quick response times and smooth experiences during gameplay, even in fast-paced games.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
14ms
10ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

After connecting the television to the computer and wishing to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 14 ms, which is practically unnoticeable on the mouse-screen-eye line. Unfortunately, the readability of the fonts is at a very low level, which practically excludes the use of Philips PUS8079 as a monitor. Why? If you take a closer look at the picture of the grey text, you will notice the phenomenon of so-called dithering. It is clearly visible that not all subpixels are illuminated on the adjacent pixels, while all should be active during the display of grey. Therefore, the text will be unbearably blurry and will effectively hinder work.

LG UT8100 will serve well as a work monitor thanks to support for chroma 4:4:4, which ensures very good legibility of text, regardless of the background. In terms of gaming, the television offers a 60 Hz panel and low input lag, making it suitable for less demanding applications. Unfortunately, the lack of support for features such as G-Sync limits its capabilities in more advanced gaming scenarios.

Viewing angles

3.8/10

6.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
41%
64%

The biggest and most common flaw of VA panels is their viewing angles. This particularly applies to units without angle coatings, which would make a significant difference in this regard. Interestingly, the tested hero performed considerably better than, for instance, the PML9009 we recently evaluated. Nevertheless, even a slight deviation from the axis leads to a strong degradation of colours and a drop in contrast.

Thanks to the use of an IPS matrix, LG UT8100 offers quite good viewing angles. The picture remains sharp and doesn't lose too much quality, even when viewed from the side. Colours are well-preserved, and brightness and contrast decrease in a noticeable but moderate degree. This is particularly important in rooms where viewers sit at different angles to the screen. In this category, the television performs solidly, standing out compared to models with VA matrices.

TV efficiency during daytime

2.6/10

4.6/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Słabe
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG UT8100 (IPS): 345 cd/m2

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

In our test sequence, there was also an opportunity to check the performance of the television during daytime viewing. Moreover, we suggest such an operational scenario, considering the insufficient contrast. However, returning to the point: the application of the satin coating yielded poor results, which, combined with the low luminance of the television across all models, effectively disqualifies it for viewing in a sunny room.

LG UT8100 has been equipped with a satin coating on the panel, which performs moderately well in reducing reflections. A brightness level of 350 cd/m² is sufficient in moderate lighting conditions, such as a typical living room. However, in very bright rooms, the television may struggle to maintain image readability, particularly on sunny days. It will perform best in settings where the lighting can be partially controlled.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
23.20.65
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS8079

LG UT8100 (IPS)

TV features

5/10

8.3/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    WebOS
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

It is impossible not to mention the biggest distinguishing feature of the manufacturer's televisions first. We are of course talking about the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which placed on the rear casing of the device projects colours adapted to what is happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater experience of immersion. The operating system responsible for the television's functionality is Philips's proprietary system charmingly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed and limited in terms of application resources than in the case of televisions from this manufacturer based on the GoogleTV system. Besides the lack of significant applications, its closed nature is also manifested in another way. We will not be able to perform basic tasks such as programming recordings or recording to USB. Those using devices from Apple may also feel disappointed by the lack of AirPlay functionality, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is the option to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the television's menu. It is worth mentioning that the possibility to connect headphones exists, but only wired ones. If we plug them in, we can also play sound from the television's speakers. It should also be added that the television is controlled via IR, not Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient in these times.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts", especially when we are aware users needing and using many streaming platforms. This is rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, namely Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

LG UT8100 operates on the WebOS system, which stands out for its intuitiveness and richness of features. The Magic Remote, with support for voice commands in Polish, further facilitates navigation. The television offers access to virtually all popular applications, such as Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video, making it an excellent multimedia centre.

In terms of user functions, the television meets most expectations. Here we find all the necessary TV tuners and the ability to record to USB, allowing for the saving of favourite programmes. It is easy to connect a keyboard, headphones or other devices via Bluetooth. Unfortunately, the lack of PiP (picture in picture) functionality may be a slight disappointment, although at this price, it is not a surprise.

Everyday use of LG UT8100 is pure pleasure – the simplicity of operation and versatility of features make it work excellently both as a home television and as a multimedia device.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
No
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8079 offers quite a wide range of capabilities, but it also has its limitations. It plays virtually all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, the issues lie in the absence of the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate and support for .sub files, which are quite popular. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, which is used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it cannot be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no possibility of expanding the functionalities, which means we are left with what the manufacturer has prepared.

LG UT8100 handles the playback of most popular video and audio formats, making it a versatile multimedia device. Although it lacks support for Apple's HEIC photo format, it still offers satisfactory functionality in this regard. Special praise should be given to the support for Polish characters in subtitles and the ability to change the font colour, allowing users to customise the displayed text to their own preferences. In this category, the television performs really well.

Apps

7/10

9.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi

Sound

5.1/10

6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.1/10
    6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    No

The best thing that can be said about the sound system in Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. There is practically a lack of midtones and bass. However, the high tones stand out in an unpleasant way. Interestingly, it features a complete set of the most important audio codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio. As a result, connecting our home theatre system will be just a formality.

The sound in LG UT8100 is basic and does not stand out in any particular way. It is sufficient for everyday TV watching, but for more demanding content, such as films or concerts, it may lack depth and dynamism. If we care about better sound quality, it will be necessary to connect an external audio system, such as a soundbar or home cinema. The built-in speakers serve their purpose, but they will not impress more discerning users.