Philips PUS7009 (VA) vs TCL P7K / P79K

Direct comparison

P7K / P79K

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Android TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

5.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.9

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.4

    5.5

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.0

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    7.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    2.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    4.6

  • Utility functions

    6.3

    7.0

  • Apps

    6.2

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.6

    6.2

Advantages

  • Good native contrast - better than the IPS panel variant

  • The dynamic tone mapping feature enhances image quality in demanding scenes

  • Okay for casual gamers - VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Supports all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS

  • Great blacks and high contrast

  • Support for 120 Hz in gaming (at lower resolutions)

  • Very low responsiveness (input lag), great for fast-paced gaming

  • Modern features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM

  • Efficient Google TV system with a vast app base

  • Very well-functioning Google Assistant in Polish

  • Easy screen mirroring from your phone (support for AirPlay)

  • Attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness (250 nits)

  • Poorly developed operating system - TitanOS

  • No support for Dolby Vision

  • Worse viewing angles than the variants 43' and 55'

  • Low brightness, which makes the HDR effect weak and the image poorly visible in sunlight

  • The image loses quality and colour when viewed from an angle

  • Not suitable as a computer monitor due to very poor text readability

  • Strong dithering phenomenon (highly digital image)

Our verdict

Philips PUS7009 with a VA panel is a television that is best suited for casual users who primarily use it for watching TV, browsing photos, or using basic applications. Thanks to the VA panel, it offers significantly better contrast and deeper blacks than the IPS version, making it a better choice for watching films in darker rooms. Features such as ALLM, VRR, and Game Bar provide satisfactory compatibility with consoles, making it a solid option for less demanding gamers. In terms of image quality, Philips PUS7009 with a VA panel offers better black levels than the IPS variant, but it is still not without its drawbacks. Low brightness and lack of Dolby Vision support mean that the television does not perform well with more demanding HDR scenes. Philips' proprietary operating system, TitanOS, still leaves much to be desired. While it offers access to basic applications, its limitations and lack of intuitiveness can be frustrating for more advanced users. At this price point, it is worth considering other models (list below) that will better meet the requirements for image quality and multimedia features.

The time has come to gather all observations. The TCL P7K / P79K is a television that cleverly juggles compromises, offering much more in its price range than we could have expected. Its undeniable asset is the VA panel, guaranteeing deep blacks and high contrast, and the surprisingly rich package for gamers (with VRR and support for 120 Hz at lower resolutions) makes it a phenomenal proposition for console owners. The whole is tied together by the functional Google TV system. Of course, the low peak brightness means that HDR content lacks spectacular bursts, and the TV's performance in sunlit rooms is limited. And although, at its relatively low price, the P7K / P79K is quite a decent option, its biggest rival turns out to be… its more refined sibling, the P8K. Often, FOR a small additional payment, we get a device of a higher class – with a native 4K 144 Hz panel, significantly better audio system, and generally higher quality of operation, which is reflected in its much higher rating on our portal. Therefore, the final verdict must be as follows: if your budget is absolutely non-negotiable, the P7K / P79K will be a good and cost-effective choice. However, if you can afford to add a small amount, the P8K model will offer significantly more and will ultimately be a more satisfying investment.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 3 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.4/10

5.2/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

4,000:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

6,500:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

2,700:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

2,800:1

Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail
Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail
Review TCL P7K / P79K Contrast and black detail

Philips PUS7009 in the 50' variant uses a VA panel, which offers better contrast and deeper blacks compared to the variant with an IPS panel, albeit with some limitations. Due to its price, this model does not feature local dimming technology, which affects the quality of blacks in challenging scenes. For example, in the film The Revenant, one can notice that the blacks take on a navy hue, which does not allow for full immersion in the film's atmosphere. Nevertheless, compared to the IPS version, the difference is noticeable in favour of the VA panel, which performs significantly better in reproducing darker scenes, providing a more satisfying picture in poorly lit rooms.

In the discussion about image quality, the conversation almost always begins with the issue of black depth and contrast, which are parameters that define the plasticity and realism of the observed world. Here, the TCL P7k/P79k immediately lays its strongest asset on the table – a VA panel. Its construction is what makes the native relation between the brightest and darkest parts of the image more than satisfactory, especially in the context of the price segment that this model represents. In the majority of scenes, the black achieved has a noble depth, which allows for building an engaging spectacle for the viewer. To illustrate the scale, it is worth mentioning that competing constructions based on IPS panels often offer results that are even four times, and sometimes five times, lower, which in direct comparison represents a chasm. Of course, when entering the territory of models oriented towards affordability, we must be aware of certain compromises. Therefore, we will not find an advanced local dimming system in the discussed television, which could further enhance the sense of contrast. However, the absence of this feature is fully understandable and constitutes a logical consequence of positioning the product in the market – this technology in TCL's portfolio for 2025 has been reserved for higher positioned, more prestigious series marked with the letter "C".

HDR effect quality

3.4/10

4.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 75.0%, Bt.2020: 55.0%
DCI P3: 86.3%, Bt.2020: 65.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

229 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

210 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

234 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

240 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

206 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Review TCL P7K / P79K Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) HDR effect quality
Review TCL P7K / P79K HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

TCL P7K / P79K

HDR luminance

Philips PUS7009 (VA)

HDR luminance

In terms of HDR effect quality, Philips PUS7009 performs very poorly. A brightness level of 250 nits does not allow one to enjoy HDR effects, and the image resembles more of a standard SDR. There is no question of dynamic effects or vivid light bursts. The coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is only 75%, which is definitely insufficient. The lack of full colour coverage means that the colours are not as vibrant as they should be, resulting in a flat and unconvincing image. There are no aspects for which this model could be praised in the context of HDR.

When turning to the assessment of HDR performance, we must be clear and without marketing embellishments: the P7K/P79K is not, and was never intended to be, a master in this field. The maximum peak brightness that this panel can generate hovers around a mere 300 nits. This represents a threshold, a kind of thin red line between what can be considered a barely satisfactory HDR signal and what is, in fact, not much different from standard dynamic range (SDR), unfortunately leaning towards the latter. Synthetic tests found brutal confirmation in reality – our measurements taken during movie screenings showed that luminance in key bright portions of the scenes rarely exceeded the ceiling of 200-250 nits. Thus, this is not a television that would allow content realised in a wide tonal range to spread its wings, and this must be openly admitted.

Unfortunately, the issue of colour reproduction is presented with equal restraint. Although the manufacturer positions this model within the "QLED" family, thanks to the use of a PFS LED filter, the results do not match the heightened expectations. The coverage of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut reaches only 86%. In the context of the market, this is at best an average result, as most devices that employ additional layers to expand the colour spectrum easily achieve values at a minimum level of 90-92%.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

5.9/10

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Factory color reproduction
Review TCL P7K / P79K Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Factory color reproduction
Review TCL P7K / P79K Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The television was tested in movie mode, which – despite its name – does not provide accurate image display. The white balance in both 4K HDR and HD/SDR content shows drops in red, causing the image to appear cooler and the colours to lose their natural warmth. The gamma brightness characteristics and the EOTF curve confirm that the television struggles to maintain appropriate brightness – it boosts it significantly, resulting in an unnaturally washed-out image. This effect can be seen in the comparisons below, where everything looks as if it has a milky filter applied. Additionally, the limited coverage of a wide colour palette also does not favour quality – color checker tests indicate significant colour variations, making it difficult to achieve faithful image reproduction.

Every accurate assessment of image quality must begin with selection of the most optimal factory mode. In the case of the tested model P7K/P79K, the choice was made without hesitation for the "Film" mode. It is this mode that presents an image closest to the intentions of the creators, avoiding both the exaggerated brightness of the dynamic mode and the excessive dimming known from eco settings. And it must be admitted that, for a device in this price range, the factory calibration is surprisingly decent, although it has not escaped a few missteps. The most noticeable flaw turned out to be the not completely correctly set white balance. A slight dominance of the blue component gives the image a subtly cool, cold character, thus deviating from the exemplary neutrality that the director wanted to show us. The television performs much better in reproducing the greyscale in the standard dynamic range – the gamma curve is nearly exemplary. The only minor reservation could be made regarding the darkest parts of the image, where a slight deviation from the norm causes a loss of some detail in the shadows. The most serious challenge for the TCL software, however, was interpreting the HDR signal, as illustrated by the course of the EOTF curve. The television follows its own, quite free path here – the darkest details are disproportionately brightened, after which there is a noticeable slowdown in the increase of brightness for midtones. Fortunately, most of these imperfections are software-related issues that can be eliminated. With this thought in mind, we began the process of professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

5.7/10

7/10

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL P7K / P79K Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL P7K / P79K Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, the image improved significantly, especially in terms of white balance, which is now more stable, and the hues have become more natural, eliminating the previous impression of an overly cool image. The calibration brought noticeable benefits in terms of tonality – the shadows and midtones are now more realistic, and the overall effect appears more harmonious. Unfortunately, hardware limitations still affect image quality. The brightness characteristics remain problematic, despite our efforts, and due to poor coverage of the DCI-P3 and BT.2020 colour spaces, delta E errors are still at a high level. Although the calibration improved some aspects, the television still does not allow for complete satisfaction.

The calibration process turned out to be spot on, particularly in the context of standard dynamic range (SDR) content. We successfully mitigated the television's tendency to emphasize cool tones, restoring the whiteness to its natural neutrality. Moreover, precise adjustments allowed us to correct a slight error in the gamma curve, ensuring that the darkest parts of the image regained their proper depth, without any trace of unnatural brightness. The effects are measurable and impressive – in the ColorChecker test, the overwhelming majority of colour reproduction errors fell below the perceptual threshold, achieving a deltaE value of under 2. This is a result that pricier models would not be ashamed of. Unfortunately, when it comes to HDR content, we encounter a barrier in the form of the inherent limitations of the panel itself. And although we managed to bring the colours into line, the software's characteristics mean that the television still adapts brightness in its own way, as evidenced by the persistent, non-standard EOTF curve. In summary, calibration adds immense value, but one must be aware that it cannot overcome certain physical barriers. The slightly elevated black level, due to the lack of local dimming, along with limited peak brightness, means that HDR content may not always be able to showcase its full potential. This is simply not the primary task of this display; its true strength, especially after professional tuning, lies in the viewing of SDR material.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.6/10

5/10

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Smoothness of tonal transitions

The gradation of tonal transitions on the Philips PUS7009 television is at a decent level and does not exhibit any serious flaws that could affect viewing comfort. Although upon closer examination, one can notice minor imperfections in the bright and colourful transitions, they are minimal enough that most viewers are unlikely to notice them. The version with the VA panel performs slightly worse in this regard; however, the differences are subtle enough that they should not hinder the average user.

The issue of the fluidity of tonal transitions, or popular grading, is another area where the P7K / P79K evokes mixed feelings and surprises with its dual nature. If we were to evaluate solely its ability to render smooth colour gradients, we would undoubtedly give it a solid score of 8/10. Unfortunately, this positive image is marred by the use of very aggressive and unpleasant dithering. This artefact is particularly noticeable on demanding test patterns – such as the one depicting an actor submerged in red water – where rough, unnatural texture appears on uniform colour surfaces, betraying the digital nature of the image. This is all the more disappointing, as it is not a new issue. It seems to be a sort of inheritance from previous generations of budget TCL models, which is a pity, as it represents a flaw on what is fundamentally a quite competent image and is a mistake that could have been avoided.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL P7K / P79K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

When it comes to tonal transitions in low-quality material, the function called "Distortion Reduction" (the "minimum" setting) effectively improves gradation, eliminating unattractive tonal transitions. However, this setting on Philips televisions is quite aggressive – while it does not blur grain or good quality material, it can introduce undesirable effects and blur elements that should remain sharp when the signal is poorer.

In terms of image scaling, Philips PUS7009 performs decently. A significant advantage is the absence of cropped image edges, meaning no overscan, which allows for the display of the full frame without loss. The image is noticeably enhanced, making characters and backgrounds, such as the model or branches in the background, look quite detailed and natural, even with lower quality signals. Although scaling is not perfect, as it can remove desired details in the distance, the effects are good enough for most users to be satisfied.

After a series of harsh evaluations, fortunately, the time comes for praise, and this is due to the TCL AiPQ image processor for its work in the field of digital processing and content scaling. It should be noted right away that we are not talking about the level known from flagship designs; however, in the price segment represented by the P7K/P79K, the results achieved are more than solid. The feature for smoothing tonal transitions performs particularly well, effectively eliminating posterisation, which are the characteristic bands often visible in highly compressed materials, for example, from the ChooseTV service. The algorithm adeptly removes unwanted gradients, which ultimately looks really good. The television also handles upscaling competently, which is the task of elevating low-resolution materials to 4K standard. The resulting image, although it may initially seem a bit too sharp, fortunately, is not a problem. The software allows for free adjustment of this parameter using a sharpness slider, making it easy to customise the final appearance to personal preferences.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.9/10

4.8/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Philips PUS7009 does not have motion smoothing capabilities, which means there is no option to adjust the image for a more choppy or smoother, cinematic effect. Such features could positively influence the reception of dynamic scenes. In terms of motion blur, this model is equipped with a 60 Hz VA panel, which offers slightly worse results than the variant with an IPS panel. The VA panel introduces minimally greater motion blur, although the differences are not significant and should not pose a problem for most viewers.

The issue of fluidity and sharpness of the image in motion is inextricably linked to a fundamental parameter of the matrix, and in the case of the TCL P7K/P79K, we are dealing with a panel with a native refresh rate of 60 Hz. This specification defines its capabilities from the outset and makes it difficult to unequivocally recommend it to enthusiasts of dynamic sports broadcasts. During fast camera movements, the image loses sharpness, and the panel also shows a slight tendency to smearing, which may be noticeable to more sensitive viewers. Fortunately, not everything in this aspect has been left to chance. The manufacturer has implemented a simple motion smoothing system, which is primarily used in film material recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second. Thanks to a dedicated slider, users can decide for themselves the final character of the motion – from maintaining a fully cinematic, slightly juddery image to achieving a very smooth, almost theatrical effect. It is a simple but effective tool that allows users to tailor the viewing experience to their own preferences.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

6.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of compatibility with consoles, Philips PUS7009 is likely to satisfy casual gamers. Although equipped with HDMI 2.0, it offers features such as ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), and Game Bar. ALLM automatically switches the television to low latency mode, which speeds up responses during gaming, while VRR adjusts the refresh rate to minimise screen tearing. Game Bar provides quick access to gaming settings and monitors key parameters, although it visually falls short compared to competing solutions. However, more demanding gamers may feel underwhelmed. Philips PUS7009 does not support advanced HDR formats in games, and the 60 Hz panel limits the ability to display smooth and detailed images in dynamic scenes, which may not satisfy fans of fast-paced action games.

Although on paper the native 4K@60Hz panel might suggest that the TCL P7K/P79K is not a television tailored for gamers, the reality is surprisingly different. On the contrary, the manufacturer has ensured a rich package of features that make it a very friendly companion for next-generation consoles. Onboard, we find key technologies such as ALLM, which provides automatic switching to low latency mode, and VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing. The list is complemented by support for Dolby Vision Gaming and a simple yet functional Game Bar. However, the real and extremely pleasant surprise is something else. It turns out that the television easily supports a high refresh rate signal of 120 Hz but at lower resolutions – 1080p and 1440p. This is fantastic news for console owners, who know well how rarely games run in native 4K at a full 120 frames per second. The ability to choose between higher resolution and doubled smoothness is therefore an extremely sensible compromise.

In summary, although the P7K/P79K may not be the target screen for the most passionate tournament players, for the casual or occasional console user, it offers a package of options that is hard to find among many competitors at this price.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
15 ms
1080p120
10 ms
2160p60
11 ms
14 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
14 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
14 ms
2160p120 DV

Input lag in Philips PUS7009 is at a very good level – it is only 11 ms for the supported resolutions. For most gamers, this low level of latency should be satisfactory, providing smooth and responsive experiences during gameplay.

Complementing this rich package for gamers is a parameter that has a direct impact on comfort and performance in gameplay – input lag. Already in native 60 Hz mode, the television boasts an excellent result of just 15 ms. However, the real magic happens when switching to 120 Hz mode, where the lag drops nearly by half, reaching values below 10 ms. Such responsiveness ensures that every command from the controller is translated to the screen in the blink of an eye, which will be appreciated not only by professionals but by anyone who values smooth and direct interaction with the game.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

2/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Average
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
43ms
16ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Compatibility with PC
Review TCL P7K / P79K Compatibility with PC

Regarding collaboration with the PC, the VA matrix variant in Philips PUS7009 is not suitable for text work, despite supporting chroma 4:4:4. The visibility of fonts is at a moderately satisfactory level. The biggest problem is their display on a dark background – the text appears "pixelated," and the letters have multicoloured textures, which significantly hinders comfortable work with documents and text editing.

We finally come to an area that can undoubtedly be described as the biggest Achilles' heel of the TCL P7K/P79K – its compatibility with PC. It is paradoxical in that, on paper, everything looks promising. The presence of G-Sync and support for high refresh rates at lower resolutions might suggest that it would also be a great monitor. Unfortunately, practice brutally verifies these assumptions. The key issue is the lack of support for full 4:4:4 chroma sampling. In everyday use, this translates to terrible font rendering quality – these, especially the coloured ones, become jagged, surrounded by artefacts, and simply poorly legible. This is not the end of the story, as in PC mode, the problem of aggressive dithering also becomes evident, giving the entire image an artificial, overly digital appearance. The only consolation in this situation is the fact that in games we can take advantage of the additional hertz and G-Sync technology, but these are not advantages that could compensate for the fundamental deficiencies in displaying a static interface. The verdict is therefore clear: while as a screen solely for gaming on PC it might still hold its own, as a monitor for work or browsing the internet, the P7K/P79K simply performs poorly.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
60%
78%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS7009 with a VA panel are distinctly worse compared to the version with an IPS panel, which is due to the inherent limitations of VA technology. When viewed at an angle, colours quickly lose their intensity, and contrast drops dramatically, making the picture appear washed out and less discernible. For those who plan to watch the television from different places in the room, this may be a significant issue, especially compared to IPS panels, which offer considerably better viewing angles and a more consistent image even when viewed from the side.

When it comes to viewing angles, we enter the territory where VA panel technology dictates unavoidable conditions. As expected, this is the weak point of this model. It is enough to move away from the screen axis to observe a gradual degradation of the image: colours begin to fade, contrast noticeably drops, and black loses its depth. In direct comparison with IPS panels, which are renowned for their generosity in this aspect, the VA panel must concede superiority to its competitor. Is there any upside to this? Paradoxically, yes. Poor viewing angles are, after all, the price we consciously pay for the fundamental advantage of this technology – a significantly higher native contrast and deeper blacks when viewed head-on. Thus, it can be said that this is a television that favours viewers sitting in the 'ideal' spot, offering them a maximally vibrant image at the cost of versatility.

Daytime performance

4.4/10

4.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Daytime performance
Review TCL P7K / P79K Daytime performance
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Daytime performance
Review TCL P7K / P79K Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL P7K / P79K: 299 cd/m2

Philips PUS7009 (VA): 280 cd/m2

Although the panel in the Philips PUS7009 is equipped with a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections, the brightness of 280 nits in SDR mode is simply too low for the television to perform well in bright rooms. As a result, in heavily sunlit conditions, details on the screen may be difficult to see, which lowers the comfort of use during the day.

The final practical test for any television is its daily performance in daytime conditions when it has to compete with ambient light. In this competition, the TCL P7K / P79K starts with a certain advantage in the form of a satin finish on the screen. Its structure handles direct reflections quite decently, diffusing them and protecting the image from excessive fading of colours or lightening of blacks. However, the passive struggle against reflections is one side of the coin. The other is the active ability to 'break through' bright surroundings, and here one of the model's key limitations comes to light. The previously mentioned peak brightness of around 300 nits is simply too low to ensure a fully comfortable and dynamic viewing experience in a brightly lit living room. In such conditions, the image may lack punch, and scenes with lower brightness can lose their clarity.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
V8-0008T01-LF1V441
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV Panel details
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV Panel details

TV features

6.3/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 3 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV features
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV features
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV features
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features
Review TCL P7K / P79K TV features

Philips has opted for a change in its approach to the operating system this year, replacing the previous open GoogleTV system with its proprietary TitanOS. As is often the case with new solutions, TitanOS is struggling with typical teething problems. Currently, it only offers basic applications, and the app store leaves much to be desired, which may disappoint users expecting a wealth of programming options. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay and the inability to record to USB are further limitations that may affect the overall user experience.

One interesting feature of the models with TitanOS is the new remote control, which, thanks to its backlighting, is very convenient to use. Unfortunately, its wireless functionality is not entirely reliable. The hybrid design means that sometimes you need to aim at the television, while other times you do not—this depends on the buttons being used. This is just plain annoying.

On the positive side, Bluetooth support should be noted, as it allows for the connection of a mouse or other peripheral devices. This is particularly useful when using the browser, which can be an alternative given the limited availability of applications in the TitanOS app store.

Smart Features – the Power of Google TV

The heart and operating brain of the TCL P7K / P79K is the Google TV system, which is a significant advantage in itself. This platform opens access to an almost limitless library of applications from the Play Store, ensuring that we won't miss any key streaming service. Integration with other devices is exemplary – Apple users will appreciate the seamless collaboration thanks to AirPlay, and Windows and Android users can easily utilise screen mirroring features. One should also highlight Google Assistant, which performs exceptionally well with voice search in Polish, remaining one of the most effective and convenient solutions of its kind on the market. The system’s performance on the tested model can be described as "above average." The interface is mostly smooth, but during tests, there were occasional slowdowns and even sporadic "freezes" that required a moment of patience. Minor glitches can also be seen in the translation of some system messages, which can be clumsy – however, these are minor oversights on TCL's part that do not affect overall functionality.

Classic Features

In the era of smart systems, traditional television functions often take a back seat, and this is also the case here. A significant advantage is the inclusion of a classic remote control with a numeric keypad, which does not require precise aiming at the screen for communication, significantly enhancing user comfort. The presence of Bluetooth technology for connecting external devices, such as headphones or speakers, should also be regarded positively. However, this is essentially where the list of conveniences ends. It is evident that TCL has almost put everything on the Google TV card, treating classic functions as an absolute minimum. Therefore, we will not find options to record programmes from built-in tuners to a USB drive or the once-popular PiP (Picture-in-Picture) feature. This is, therefore, a basic package that simply works but does not offer anything beyond what is essential.

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

7.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
Yes
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
No
12 Mpix
No
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

In terms of playing files from USB, Philips PUS7009 performs quite decently. The television plays most popular formats of photos, audio, and video, and an additional plus is the support for Polish subtitles and the ability to change fonts. Unfortunately, it has issues with playing certain photo resolutions.

The built-in media player in the P7k/P79k model is quite a puzzling case, placing us in a rather unusual situation. On one hand, its engine manages to decode most popular video formats, which is obviously good news. On the other hand, we encountered a surprising and frustrating flaw – the default app has a fundamental issue with correctly displaying Polish diacritical characters in subtitle files. Instead of letters like "ą," "ę," or "ż," empty squares or random, unreadable symbols appeared on the screen. Fortunately, thanks to the flexibility of the Google TV system, this issue can be easily circumvented. Installing an alternative, advanced player, such as the tried and tested VLC or KODI, fully resolves this inconvenience. The situation is particularly odd since we didn't encounter such a flaw in other TCL models we tested previously. We are therefore dealing with an obvious software oversight, which we hope will be fixed in a future update.

Apps

6.2/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

5.6/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound in Philips PUS7009 is rather flat and does not stand out compared to other televisions. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the television supports all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS, which is a plus in terms of compatibility with various audio sources.

In terms of the built-in audio system, the TCL P7k/P79k presents a level that can be described as functional and correct, but lacking audiophile ambitions. The speakers play quite loudly, and the dialogues in films and television programmes are delivered clearly and without distortion, which is crucial in everyday use. However, the soundstage definitely lacks a foundation in the form of low tones. This is a direct consequence of the absence of a dedicated subwoofer – an element that in the higher P8K series, represented by a large Onkyo subwoofer at the back of the cabinet, constituted the strength of its sound. Here, that element is simply missing, which makes the sound seem flatter and devoid of the depth that creates a cinematic atmosphere. We also noticed a peculiar aspect in the software – when attempting to set the maximum volume, the television automatically reduces it. It is difficult to determine definitively whether this is a form of protection against distortion or a minor software glitch; nonetheless, it’s a shame because the power reserves seem to be slightly greater.