Philips PUS7009 (VA) vs Samsung U8000F (VA)

Direct comparison

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

5.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.9

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.4

    5.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.0

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    6.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    3.8

  • Utility functions

    6.3

    5.3

  • Apps

    6.7

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    5.6

    5.7

Advantages

  • Good native contrast - better than the IPS panel variant

  • The dynamic tone mapping feature enhances image quality in demanding scenes

  • Okay for casual gamers - VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Supports all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS

  • Decent black and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Great for working with text - excellent font display

  • Basic functions for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness (250 nits)

  • Poorly developed operating system - TitanOS

  • No support for Dolby Vision

  • Worse viewing angles than the variants 43' and 55'

  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles than the IPS matrix version (Obvious obviousness 😉)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Worse appearance than its predecessor

Our verdict

Philips PUS7009 with a VA panel is a television that is best suited for casual users who primarily use it for watching TV, browsing photos, or using basic applications. Thanks to the VA panel, it offers significantly better contrast and deeper blacks than the IPS version, making it a better choice for watching films in darker rooms. Features such as ALLM, VRR, and Game Bar provide satisfactory compatibility with consoles, making it a solid option for less demanding gamers. In terms of image quality, Philips PUS7009 with a VA panel offers better black levels than the IPS variant, but it is still not without its drawbacks. Low brightness and lack of Dolby Vision support mean that the television does not perform well with more demanding HDR scenes. Philips' proprietary operating system, TitanOS, still leaves much to be desired. While it offers access to basic applications, its limitations and lack of intuitiveness can be frustrating for more advanced users. At this price point, it is worth considering other models (list below) that will better meet the requirements for image quality and multimedia features.

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. The biggest advantage of this variant is certainly the quality of black levels. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is enormous – the image gains depth, contrast looks significantly better, and evening film sessions no longer feel like watching content through a grey filter. For a budget segment device, this is truly a nice surprise. The reliable Tizen system is also a plus, as it not only runs smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and a voice assistant (via the app). The PC mode and console connection function flawlessly – fonts are clear and readable. Additionally, it includes basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t transform this television into an e-sports machine – are completely sufficient for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel has its limitations. Viewing angles are not its strongest point – when watching from the side, it’s easy to notice a drop in quality. Nonetheless, it's hard to see this as a serious flaw – because something has to give. Better black levels always come at the cost of slightly less flexibility in positioning. When it comes to HDR, we have rather a symbolic approach – brightness is too low to speak of a true "wow" effect, and the colour palette is limited. But let’s face the truth – that’s not the reason one buys such a television. So if you are planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the variant with a VA panel. It’s still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than one might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price bracket, that’s quite a lot.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.4/10

5.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Philips PUS7009 in the 50' variant uses a VA panel, which offers better contrast and deeper blacks compared to the variant with an IPS panel, albeit with some limitations. Due to its price, this model does not feature local dimming technology, which affects the quality of blacks in challenging scenes. For example, in the film The Revenant, one can notice that the blacks take on a navy hue, which does not allow for full immersion in the film's atmosphere. Nevertheless, compared to the IPS version, the difference is noticeable in favour of the VA panel, which performs significantly better in reproducing darker scenes, providing a more satisfying picture in poorly lit rooms.

It is worth noting that the test concerns variants with a VA panel, which perform considerably better in terms of black levels and contrast than the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (although it is not a top result among VA panels), the tested scenes looked significantly better – without noticeable greyness or the typical washed-out shadows associated with IPS panels. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, we are not dealing with a construction equipped with local dimming, so it is difficult to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we are talking about an exceptionally budget television that performs quite solidly within its category.

HDR effect quality

3.4/10

3.1/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 75.0%, Bt.2020: 55.0%
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

229 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

210 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

234 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

240 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung U8000F (VA)

Philips PUS7009 (VA)

In terms of HDR effect quality, Philips PUS7009 performs very poorly. A brightness level of 250 nits does not allow one to enjoy HDR effects, and the image resembles more of a standard SDR. There is no question of dynamic effects or vivid light bursts. The coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is only 75%, which is definitely insufficient. The lack of full colour coverage means that the colours are not as vibrant as they should be, resulting in a flat and unconvincing image. There are no aspects for which this model could be praised in the context of HDR.

While the U8000F with a VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there is no longer any reason to be enthusiastic about brightness – especially in HDR scenes. The television achieves a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too low to speak of any impressive light effects. Bright elements appear pale, and scenes that should sparkle look rather flat. We observed an interesting situation during the test of a scene from the film Sicario 2 – the screen became noticeably darker, as if the television was trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to enhance contrast, but in practice, the effect makes very little difference, other than the fact that we see less on the screen. Furthermore, there is the issue of colours – the U8000F does not support a wide colour gamut, so one cannot count on the vibrant, saturated hues known from better models. The HDR image here resembles slightly brightened SDR and... perhaps that is even a good thing. With this model, it is not worth expecting a cinematic experience – it is better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

6.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The television was tested in movie mode, which – despite its name – does not provide accurate image display. The white balance in both 4K HDR and HD/SDR content shows drops in red, causing the image to appear cooler and the colours to lose their natural warmth. The gamma brightness characteristics and the EOTF curve confirm that the television struggles to maintain appropriate brightness – it boosts it significantly, resulting in an unnaturally washed-out image. This effect can be seen in the comparisons below, where everything looks as if it has a milky filter applied. Additionally, the limited coverage of a wide colour palette also does not favour quality – color checker tests indicate significant colour variations, making it difficult to achieve faithful image reproduction.

The Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode it offers out of the box – the Filmmaker Mode. This profile is theoretically meant to provide a neutral, cinematic image devoid of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – primarily in HD or SD resolution – the television performed surprisingly decently right out of the box. The only noticeable flaw was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, this did not significantly affect the viewing experience. Considering the television's segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation is much weaker in HDR mode. While the white balance was still acceptable, the colour inaccuracies were very apparent. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself appeared unnatural – the colours were shifted, sometimes too cool, other times simply dull and lifeless. The main problem lies in the hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide colour gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically incapable of reproducing the colours that the HDR standard anticipates. Unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

Color reproduction after calibration

5.7/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the image improved significantly, especially in terms of white balance, which is now more stable, and the hues have become more natural, eliminating the previous impression of an overly cool image. The calibration brought noticeable benefits in terms of tonality – the shadows and midtones are now more realistic, and the overall effect appears more harmonious. Unfortunately, hardware limitations still affect image quality. The brightness characteristics remain problematic, despite our efforts, and due to poor coverage of the DCI-P3 and BT.2020 colour spaces, delta E errors are still at a high level. Although the calibration improved some aspects, the television still does not allow for complete satisfaction.

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered quite a decent image in SDR for its price class. However, we managed to enhance it slightly – we reduced a subtle purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the television still tends to overly brighten the brightest details – the gamma chart shows a clear inflection that cannot be completely corrected.

In HDR mode, however, it is noticeably weaker. It is hard to speak of any significant improvement here – despite attempts to adjust the settings, the image still presents considerable colour inaccuracies. A Delta E exceeding 7 signifies noticeable deviations that could not be effectively reduced. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the construction itself – the U8000F simply was not designed for serious HDR. In everyday viewing in SDR, it performs quite well, but when it comes to HDR content... it's best not to have overly high expectations.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.6/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The gradation of tonal transitions on the Philips PUS7009 television is at a decent level and does not exhibit any serious flaws that could affect viewing comfort. Although upon closer examination, one can notice minor imperfections in the bright and colourful transitions, they are minimal enough that most viewers are unlikely to notice them. The version with the VA panel performs slightly worse in this regard; however, the differences are subtle enough that they should not hinder the average user.

One of the significant elements affecting the perception of the image is the way in which the television handles tonal transitions – that is, the blending of colours and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, it performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe visible banding or disturbances in the colour gradients. The image retains a natural character, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately is often the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright areas, but they are practically unnoticeable and do not affect everyday use of the television.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to tonal transitions in low-quality material, the function called "Distortion Reduction" (the "minimum" setting) effectively improves gradation, eliminating unattractive tonal transitions. However, this setting on Philips televisions is quite aggressive – while it does not blur grain or good quality material, it can introduce undesirable effects and blur elements that should remain sharp when the signal is poorer.

In terms of image scaling, Philips PUS7009 performs decently. A significant advantage is the absence of cropped image edges, meaning no overscan, which allows for the display of the full frame without loss. The image is noticeably enhanced, making characters and backgrounds, such as the model or branches in the background, look quite detailed and natural, even with lower quality signals. Although scaling is not perfect, as it can remove desired details in the distance, the effects are good enough for most users to be satisfied.

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same position in the lineup. This year's model has been equipped with a feature to improve the fluidity of tone transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Indeed, the television still utilizes quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but nonetheless – it can confidently be said that it works effectively. However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slightly cutting the image when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must reckon with the fact that the image may appear slightly "cut off".

Blur and motion smoothness

4.9/10

4/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
47%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

Philips PUS7009 does not have motion smoothing capabilities, which means there is no option to adjust the image for a more choppy or smoother, cinematic effect. Such features could positively influence the reception of dynamic scenes. In terms of motion blur, this model is equipped with a 60 Hz VA panel, which offers slightly worse results than the variant with an IPS panel. The VA panel introduces minimally greater motion blur, although the differences are not significant and should not pose a problem for most viewers.

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so it's clear right from the start that one shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply the standard in this class – adequate for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks. The television offers a single motion smoothing slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction," which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in films. Higher settings produce a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help retain the film's original character with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is "Clear Motion LED," which is the BFI mode – inserting black frames between image frames to improve motion clarity. In practice, however, the screen flickers heavily when this feature is activated and should rather be considered an experiment than something that genuinely enhances gaming comfort.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

5.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

In terms of compatibility with consoles, Philips PUS7009 is likely to satisfy casual gamers. Although equipped with HDMI 2.0, it offers features such as ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), and Game Bar. ALLM automatically switches the television to low latency mode, which speeds up responses during gaming, while VRR adjusts the refresh rate to minimise screen tearing. Game Bar provides quick access to gaming settings and monitors key parameters, although it visually falls short compared to competing solutions. However, more demanding gamers may feel underwhelmed. Philips PUS7009 does not support advanced HDR formats in games, and the 60 Hz panel limits the ability to display smooth and detailed images in dynamic scenes, which may not satisfy fans of fast-paced action games.

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which may still be sufficient for less demanding users. It includes an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the television automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response times. There is also a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce the "tearing" effect – as long as we stay within this range.

Unfortunately, that’s about it for the advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher-end Samsung models from the 2025 line. In theory, the television also supports the HGiG feature, which should adjust HDR imagery to the creators' intentions. Unfortunately – despite the fact that this feature appears in brochures and promotional materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
11 ms
1080p120
2160p60
11 ms
11 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
11 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag in Philips PUS7009 is at a very good level – it is only 11 ms for the supported resolutions. For most gamers, this low level of latency should be satisfactory, providing smooth and responsive experiences during gameplay.

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. One can confidently say that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to large delays between what we do on the pad and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
43ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Regarding collaboration with the PC, the VA matrix variant in Philips PUS7009 is not suitable for text work, despite supporting chroma 4:4:4. The visibility of fonts is at a moderately satisfactory level. The biggest problem is their display on a dark background – the text appears "pixelated," and the letters have multicoloured textures, which significantly hinders comfortable work with documents and text editing.

Working on a computer using this television is a true pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and despite being a VA panel, the text readability is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, it should be noted that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange as VRR operated without problems when it came to consoles.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

3.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
60%
67%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS7009 with a VA panel are distinctly worse compared to the version with an IPS panel, which is due to the inherent limitations of VA technology. When viewed at an angle, colours quickly lose their intensity, and contrast drops dramatically, making the picture appear washed out and less discernible. For those who plan to watch the television from different places in the room, this may be a significant issue, especially compared to IPS panels, which offer considerably better viewing angles and a more consistent image even when viewed from the side.

Daytime performance

4.4/10

3.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Philips PUS7009 (VA): 280 cd/m2

Although the panel in the Philips PUS7009 is equipped with a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections, the brightness of 280 nits in SDR mode is simply too low for the television to perform well in bright rooms. As a result, in heavily sunlit conditions, details on the screen may be difficult to see, which lowers the comfort of use during the day.

Thanks to the satin finish of the Samsung U8092F matrix, it handles glare quite well. The screen does not act like a mirror, and the colours – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain relatively saturated, even in slightly brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating itself won't work wonders. The television is simply too dark to effectively penetrate very difficult lighting conditions. If we place it facing a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must consider that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
1064
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV Panel details
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV Panel details

TV features

6.3/10

5.3/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV features
Review Philips PUS7009 (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features

Philips has opted for a change in its approach to the operating system this year, replacing the previous open GoogleTV system with its proprietary TitanOS. As is often the case with new solutions, TitanOS is struggling with typical teething problems. Currently, it only offers basic applications, and the app store leaves much to be desired, which may disappoint users expecting a wealth of programming options. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay and the inability to record to USB are further limitations that may affect the overall user experience.

One interesting feature of the models with TitanOS is the new remote control, which, thanks to its backlighting, is very convenient to use. Unfortunately, its wireless functionality is not entirely reliable. The hybrid design means that sometimes you need to aim at the television, while other times you do not—this depends on the buttons being used. This is just plain annoying.

On the positive side, Bluetooth support should be noted, as it allows for the connection of a mouse or other peripheral devices. This is particularly useful when using the browser, which can be an alternative given the limited availability of applications in the TitanOS app store.

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home integration, and various add-ons, including exclusive Samsung applications. Features such as AirPlay and Chromecast are also available, allowing us to easily connect our phone to the television and share multimedia.

Unfortunately, since this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not choose to include a solar remote control. In the box, we find a classic infrared remote control that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for typical "television" add-ons – there is no recording feature or PiP (picture-in-picture) mode. On the positive side, the HDMI eARC works well, allowing easy control of devices like a decoder or soundbar with the bundled remote – and it indeed works seamlessly.

Apps

6.7/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

In terms of playing files from USB, Philips PUS7009 performs quite decently. The television plays most popular formats of photos, audio, and video, and an additional plus is the support for Polish subtitles and the ability to change fonts. Unfortunately, it has issues with playing certain photo resolutions.

Samsung U8092F handles the playback of files quite seamlessly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but this is simply not found in any Samsung model.

Certain reservations can be made regarding the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, while other extensions such as SRT or SUB unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it is worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future through a television operating system update.

Sound

5.6/10

5.7/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound in Philips PUS7009 is rather flat and does not stand out compared to other televisions. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the television supports all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS, which is a plus in terms of compatibility with various audio sources.

U8092F does not pretend to have home cinema on board. We receive a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds decent, but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, this audio setup is entirely sufficient. We were positively surprised that it managed to play a film with the built-in Dolby Atmos (JOC) codec – although of course, we are not talking about true surround sound here.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC