Philips PUS7000 vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    6.5

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.8

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    3.5

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    7.0

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    6.5

Advantages

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast of the VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Support for HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap television)

  • Good readability of fonts – works well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with a numeric keypad

  • Very good contrast and black levels: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Fairly high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional gaming modes: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide selection of apps

  • Supports multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Absence of any smoothness-enhancing features makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface works slowly, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

  • The matrix has significant smearing

  • Strongly visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor bugs in the system

  • Great chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it’s really just the price. This is a model that is primarily meant to be cheap, and it accomplishes that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget model at 60 Hz", Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which, when connected to a console, really improves the experience and makes everything quite responsive. But... there’s the catch. The biggest issue with this television is its brightness, or rather the lack of it. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and unclear, despite having a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is essentially just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary punch, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically lag behind other cheap screens. The question is whether you will get along with the Titan OS system, which is currently a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard at the competition. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs aplenty, the Philips PUS7000 is in for a really tough battle. If you value a known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. Indeed, in many respects, it is a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good blacks and brightness that competes with more expensive models. In fact, it is identical to the slightly pricier C6K model that we have already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features that make it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the overall impression is tarnished by the performance of the panel used. The television struggles with noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) causes the image to often appear unnatural and artificial – as if it were being overly sharpened. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS is not its flaws, but its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or slightly less) as the fully-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete construction without those annoying errors. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition – if its price drops drastically. For the moment, a significantly safer and better option remains paying a (often nominal) premium for the C6K model. One could cynically state that the letter "S" in the name indeed stands for "Slim." Only it does not refer to an exceptionally slim chassis, but to how much this model has been "trimmed" in terms of features compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail
Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

The model PUS7000 tested by us in the size of 55 inches has been equipped with a VA panel. This is of great importance for the quality of black, as in such budget constructions we will not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. All the work thus rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at the level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewing than in the case of competing televisions with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, which means that dark parts of the image do not appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. It is worth adding, however, that with the lights completely off, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it is advisable to consider watching the television with light, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips televisions, which optically increases contrast through a glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we will not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series, such as the PUS8000.

Let’s move on to what tigers like the most, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) results from drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black and contrast. In a direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model barely falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we have a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. Interestingly – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones (in the same size) in the C6KS as in the more expensive counterpart we tested! Black levels perform very well. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major flaws that often plague budget constructions without local dimming. Of course, we can’t cheat physics. It’s important to consider that in very demanding scenes (e.g. bright text on a black background), we may occasionally notice undesirable effects, such as blooming (the halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – generally, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

3.3/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

HDR luminance

Philips PUS7000

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. The screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to properly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it is better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as discussed below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers enhancing colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

And what about HDR? Here, the C6KS performs quite well and – as has become a recurring theme of this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must keep in mind the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible blacks. This is quite a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, "true black" more than additional micro-details, the display of which could cause the screen to appear greyed out. This is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It is also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the slogan of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colours are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide colour gamut reaches as much as 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

5/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw came to light. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and overly low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one may get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find quite a few functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option in the menu labelled as Filmmaker Mode. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of colour reproduction, the lack of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers an almost identical picture characteristic to the aforementioned Filmmaker in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. Therefore, if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colours – the answer is no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7.5/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Color reproduction after calibration

After professional calibration, it is evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not at all a given. The effects should be evaluated in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the picture looks really good. Most colour errors have fallen below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions usually begin to be visible to the naked eye in measurements. Films, series, sports, and regular television look natural, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be clearly stated that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for reasonable HDR, and calibration changes very little in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: the colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions to expand the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most apparent in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the C69KS's tendency to distort colours has been effectively limited, resulting in a very good final effect. After calibration, we will no longer see excessive warming of scenes in SDR or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it is worth noting the brightness characteristics. In SDR content, it is hard to have any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programmes, or materials from YouTube. It is significantly more challenging to evaluate the television's performance in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behaviour, but its practical variant reveals certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times, it can dim the entire scene. Thus, calibration brought clear benefits in terms of colour quality, but certain limitations resulting from the local dimming operation and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be overlooked, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

4.8/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It is hard to have any significant reservations here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means that on a bright background, there are no troubling bands or jumps between shades. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, at that point, quite strong 'stepping' of colours is visible. Instead of smooth transitions, we get clear cut-offs between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite irritating and distract from the film itself, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

Looking solely at the fluidity of tonal transitions, the C69KS offers no real cause for complaint. The colour gradation is executed correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. So you may be surprised by the low rating in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final rating is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at low settings. However, it has a drawback: if applied too aggressively, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. Therefore, it would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find a happy medium between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower-resolution materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for nearly all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If it feels too soft for someone, the sharpness slider in the menu can always be adjusted to achieve a more pronounced effect.

The C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a considerable amount of detail is retained, and the algorithm adds a slight "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. The performance in smoothing tonal transitions is less impressive. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a rather raw state. With older material, this can be quite tiring, as the lack of additional processing highlights any imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.9/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

In this respect, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that is actually the norm, and it is hard to expect anything more. However, the worst part is that the television does not have any features to improve motion smoothness. There is a lack of any supporting systems, both in films and in sports. We must come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw". This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion can appear choppy or unclear. We do not have the option to enable any smoothers that would reduce this effect.

C69KS offers a simplified motion enhancement panel in films, allowing the adjustment of effect intensity with a slider. This makes it easy to match fluidity to personal preferences. The ability to use higher refresh rates is also a plus – although the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p enables 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, however, in practice, the image at these settings exhibits significant motion blur. The effect is so pronounced that the overall presentation appears merely average and loses its appeal for everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming television, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While it is true that we won’t find support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has ensured several important features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience on consoles. The most important of these are the VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from tearing and keeps it consistent even during sudden drops in frame rate while gaming. In contrast, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the television to the lowest latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be summoned on screen at any time. It allows for a quick preview of the current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

If we overlook the smudging and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything one can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a well-functioning HGiG. The television can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on a console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings while gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a really successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
9 ms
1080p120
2160p60
12 ms
9 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
9 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
9 ms
2160p120 DV

Another advantage for gamers is the very low input lag of around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so small that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's difficult to notice at all. Playing remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with significantly more expensive televisions.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, making reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

5.8/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 Compatibility with PC
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Compatibility with PC

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming possibilities are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles chroma subsampling 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble rendering fonts cleanly.

Aside from the aforementioned possibility of working at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor — the darkest ones have a distinct, rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that working on the computer for an extended period can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
70%
80%

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which is directly due to the use of a VA type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just a slight shift to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image to become noticeably worse.

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA matrices. It is a compromise that we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good straight on, but any significant deviation causes rapid drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

3.5/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

In a sunlit room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all due to the fact that the panel is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin coating of the screen does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not so prominent on the panel, but it is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be rather unclear.

The C6KS performs really well as a television viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits allows it to easily cut through more challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, the satin finish effectively suppresses reflections. As a result, the television proves to be surprisingly solid during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

Philips PUS7000

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

5/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still quite a new operating system and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. Everything functions sluggishly and at times, clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth/RF. This means that we need to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we still could not activate the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting images from Apple devices using the AirPlay function went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very limited application library. The selection is significantly smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programmes is nearly unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 could be a good choice for those who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic programme guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which makes it much easier to operate after dark, and has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting feature is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home cinema systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It's an environment that offers a lot — ideal for those who prioritise a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and the voice assistant work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply comfortable.

The support for traditional television looks somewhat weaker. Users who are counting on advanced "television" features may feel overlooked. Aside from the efficiently functioning Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player works quite efficiently and handles most popular video formats without significant issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a hard drive or USB stick should not feel constrained. The only drawback concerns the photo browser - not everything functioned correctly, and some files, especially at selected resolutions, did not open at all.

The system player really performs well and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hitch occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g. HEIC) – here TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, e.g. VLC. This way, you can quickly fill in the gaps of the factory player and run virtually any material, customising the TV to your liking.

Sound

5.8/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound quality is distinctly budget-level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programmes, but when it comes to films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. It's hard to expect anything more at this price, so if better experiences are important to us, it's worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even via the headphone output.

The TCL C6KS performs practically identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same speaker set branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth keeping the proper perspective. This bass is quite decent compared to other televisions, but a home cinema system or even a basic soundbar will still offer a significantly fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS will be suitable for regular television viewing, but if someone is looking for a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be the natural choice.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data