Philips PUS7000 vs Haier M95E

Direct comparison

M95 / M95EUX

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 65”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

7.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    6.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    5.6

  • Gaming on console

    6.5

    7.8

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.8

    6.6

  • Watching in bright light

    3.5

    8.5

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    3.6

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    9.2

Advantages

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast of the VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Support for HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap television)

  • Good readability of fonts – works well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with a numeric keypad

  • Phenomenal sound: Built-in audio system from Harman Kardon

  • Very high brightness: up to 1700 nits

  • Good panel for gaming and sport: 144Hz, low motion blur

  • Low input lag: below 10 ms (at 120Hz)

  • Full gaming package: Two HDMI 2.1 ports, support for 4K@144Hz, VRR (G-Sync) and ALLM provide a solid foundation for consoles and PC

  • Great tonal fluidity: The television handles gradients and colour transitions excellently

  • Wide colour gamut (QLED): 96% DCI-P3 coverage ensures vivid and saturated colours

  • Support for Dolby Vision and HDR10+

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Absence of any smoothness-enhancing features makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface works slowly, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

  • Very underdeveloped dimming algorithms are the biggest disadvantage. The Mini LED zones "dance" on the screen.

  • Clunky Google TV system: The entire interface operates slowly, has annoying stutters, and encounters errors.

  • Non-functioning motion smoother in films.

  • Average performance with PC: At 120Hz and 144Hz, the television struggles with sharp font display.

  • Very high price considering the current state of the product.

Our verdict

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it’s really just the price. This is a model that is primarily meant to be cheap, and it accomplishes that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget model at 60 Hz", Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which, when connected to a console, really improves the experience and makes everything quite responsive. But... there’s the catch. The biggest issue with this television is its brightness, or rather the lack of it. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and unclear, despite having a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is essentially just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary punch, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically lag behind other cheap screens. The question is whether you will get along with the Titan OS system, which is currently a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard at the competition. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs aplenty, the Philips PUS7000 is in for a really tough battle. If you value a known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

Haier M95E is on paper a television that looks like the dream come true for any "bargain hunter". When we look at the specifications – a Mini LED panel with hundreds of zones, a powerful brightness exceeding 1500 nits, a QLED 144Hz matrix, phenomenally low input lag, and sound branded by Harman Kardon – everything screams "flagship!". We are dealing with equipment that theoretically should challenge the most expensive players on the market. Unfortunately, if you read our review carefully, you will need to pay close attention, as there is one word that recurs almost in every paragraph: "but...". And it is this word that perfectly summarises this model. M95E is a television of gigantic contradictions and wasted potential, where nearly every advantage is brutally countered by a fundamental software flaw. So we have hundreds of dimming zones, but the algorithms controlling them create a distracting disco on the screen. We have phenomenal HDR brightness, but the television completely fails to manage tone mapping and burns out details. We have an ultra-fast, smooth 144Hz panel, but motion smoothing systems for films practically do not exist. We have a great package for gamers, but without HGiG and with problems displaying fonts. Finally, we have fantastic sound, but wrapped in a clunky and annoying Smart TV system. This is why the Haier M95E is such a frustrating device. It is a story of fantastic hardware that lacked the final, most important polish – refined software.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

6.8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 576 (24 x 24)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

152,100:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

36,400:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

37,800:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

13,850:1

Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail
Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review Haier M95E Contrast and black detail

The model PUS7000 tested by us in the size of 55 inches has been equipped with a VA panel. This is of great importance for the quality of black, as in such budget constructions we will not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. All the work thus rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at the level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewing than in the case of competing televisions with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, which means that dark parts of the image do not appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. It is worth adding, however, that with the lights completely off, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it is advisable to consider watching the television with light, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips televisions, which optically increases contrast through a glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we will not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series, such as the PUS8000.

Getting to the heart of the matter, namely the assessment of black levels and contrast, we must begin with specifications that evoke genuine admiration on paper. The Haier M95E is a Mini LED construction, equipped in its 65-inch version with an impressive grid of 576 independent dimming zones (a symmetrical layout of 24x24). When we combine this technology with a VA panel, renowned for its native deep blacks, our expectations for image depth instantly rise. And indeed, as long as we feed the television with static test patterns, everything looks phenomenal. The contrast measurements are so remarkable that the M95E almost throws down the gauntlet to the most expensive players in the market. Unfortunately, this admiration lasts only until we switch on the first random piece of film material.

As soon as motion appears on screen – and we’re not even talking about wild chases, but rather ordinary dialogue or a camera transition – a fundamental weakness of the rudimentary backlight control algorithms comes to light. If you remember our tests of the Xiaomi S MINI-LED 2025 model, the story dangerously circles back. The dimming zones seem to have a life of their own, throwing a kind of "light disco". Chaotic flashes and visible backlight pumping are unfortunately very distracting and spoil the viewing experience, creating a huge HALO effect. Importantly, we conducted tests on the "High" dimming setting. It turns out that in our unit, this was the only mode in which the zones could undertake any meaningful work in HDR content, without causing a drastic drop in overall brightness. All of this leads to one conclusion: the M95E has enormous, yet completely untapped hardware potential. Clearly, there has been a lack of hours spent refining the software, which forced us to lower the score in this key category.

HDR effect quality

3.3/10

6.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%
DCI P3: 95.9%, Bt.2020: 80.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

1224 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

662 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

1143 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

568 nit

Review Haier M95E Brightness measurement

Result

898 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Haier M95E HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Haier M95E

HDR luminance

Philips PUS7000

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. The screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to properly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it is better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as discussed below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers enhancing colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

If there is one category in which the Haier M95E absolutely shines, it is the HDR effect, driven by the raw power of the backlighting. This television cannot be denied the fact that it is a truly bright device. In both most film scenes and during our synthetic measurements, the panel easily achieved, and often even exceeded, the threshold of 1200-1500 nits. This has a direct impact on the viewing experience – the image has a punch and genuinely allows one to feel the magic of materials recorded in this format. However, one must be aware of a certain compromise. When exceptionally demanding scenes appear on the screen, full of small but intense points of light, the M95E does not lose its resonance or dim, but pays a different price for it. A very strong and noticeably distracting halo effect is generated around these bright elements. It is clear here that the algorithms controlling the dimming have been programmed to prioritise brightness and the visibility of the smallest details, even if this comes at the expense of pristine blacks. We are not entirely convinced that this is the healthiest approach; nonetheless, it must be acknowledged that the overall capabilities of the M95E in this regard are indeed significant. A huge advantage is the fact that we are dealing with a Mini LED QLED type construction. The use of a layer of quantum dots brings measurable benefits in the form of wide coverage of the colour palette, which in our tests reached nearly 96% of the DCI-P3 space. This guarantees that the television has full predispositions for displaying vibrant and properly saturated colours.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

4.6/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review Haier M95E Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review Haier M95E Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw came to light. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and overly low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one may get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find quite a few functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Each television is primarily evaluated based on its default cinema mode – in this case, "Movie" – which theoretically should be the "best" and most faithful upon being taken out of the box. Unfortunately, in the case of the Haier M95E, the word "best" is certainly not synonymous with the word "good." Already during SDR viewing, the picture revealed evident problems: white balance skewed too much to red, and excessive, unnatural colour saturation led to visible colour deviations. What’s worse, the M95E also struggles with brightness management (gamma curve), excessively darkening the entire scene. Such behaviour is hard to commend, as it directly leads to details merging into shadows that are irrevocably lost in a black blob.

However, the real disaster occurred after switching to HDR material, while still remaining in "Movie" mode. It’s hard for us to guess who came up with such a fantastic idea – or perhaps it was simply a complete oversight of this stage by Haier's engineers – but instead of cinematic fidelity, the picture began to resemble a garish "Dynamic" mode. The white balance exposed immense problems with the blue colour, which in turn resulted in unnatural sharpening and artificial over-saturation of the entire scene. As if that weren’t enough, the EOTF curve characteristics mercilessly revealed that the television also has fundamental issues with local dimming management in this setting. We have not calibrated many Haier models in our career, but we already know for sure that the M95E definitely needs such calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

6/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier M95E Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier M95E Color reproduction after calibration

After professional calibration, it is evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not at all a given. The effects should be evaluated in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the picture looks really good. Most colour errors have fallen below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions usually begin to be visible to the naked eye in measurements. Films, series, sports, and regular television look natural, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be clearly stated that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for reasonable HDR, and calibration changes very little in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: the colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions to expand the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most apparent in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

The calibration process left us with extremely mixed feelings. On the one hand, we noted considerable success in the area of colour accuracy. By using the available options in the menu, we managed to tame the white balance and bring it down to an acceptable level. As a result, SDR content finally freed itself from the irritating red dominance, and the HDR image no longer resembled a vibrant, shop display mode. We also succeeded in clearly adjusting the entire colour palette and its saturation – perhaps not perfectly, but as much as the software allowed, and the difference was visible to the naked eye.

And unfortunately, this is where our list of improvements essentially ends, as the M95E simply did not allow for more. As we indicated earlier, most settings related to image brightness do not respond to our commands at all. This means that we were unable to grasp its fundamental characteristics in any way – neither the gamma curve nor the EOTF. In practice, the television in SDR content still tends to darken details, as confirmed by the elevated gamma, merging details in the shadows. Meanwhile, the EOTF curve in HDR mode still ruthlessly exposes all the aforementioned problems with chaotic local dimming management. And although the calibration process itself yielded a lot, removing most of the colour issues, in the end, we had to capitulate.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

9.4/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It is hard to have any significant reservations here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means that on a bright background, there are no troubling bands or jumps between shades. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, at that point, quite strong 'stepping' of colours is visible. Instead of smooth transitions, we get clear cut-offs between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite irritating and distract from the film itself, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

We now move on to the category that has turned out to be one of the strongest points of the tested model. The fluidity of tonal transitions, or the ability to smoothly blend closely related shades, is at a very high level here. The Haier M95E excels at reproducing gradients, even in the most demanding dark scenes, where many televisions can already show unsightly banding (posterization). Although we did manage to notice minimal shortcomings in very bright parts of the image, these are errors so minor that they do not spoil the overall excellent impression. In this particular competition, the M95E deserves one of the highest ratings on our portal.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier M95E Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at low settings. However, it has a drawback: if applied too aggressively, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. Therefore, it would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find a happy medium between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower-resolution materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for nearly all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If it feels too soft for someone, the sharpness slider in the menu can always be adjusted to achieve a more pronounced effect.

Well, what happens to those colour connections when a lower quality material full of compression artifacts comes on screen? Unfortunately, we have some bad news for you. Although the menu contains an option responsible for smoothing tonal transitions in older content, we definitely DO NOT RECOMMEND using it. Its activation causes an avalanche of additional, hideous artifacts and noticeably blurs the entire image, and what's funniest – it often doesn't even remove those unwanted "jaggies" it was supposed to fight against. This function might as well not exist at all.

We can write many more positive remarks about the general upscaling process, which raises lower resolutions to the native 4K matrix. The image after upscaling looks really decent – it is neither overly jagged nor artificially smoothed. In this particular matter, the M95E simply performs well.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.9/10

6.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

In this respect, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that is actually the norm, and it is hard to expect anything more. However, the worst part is that the television does not have any features to improve motion smoothness. There is a lack of any supporting systems, both in films and in sports. We must come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw". This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion can appear choppy or unclear. We do not have the option to enable any smoothers that would reduce this effect.

In terms of motion fluidity and blur, our feelings are quite mixed, as the M95E is a paradox of a television. Let's start with absolute admiration: at the heart of the device is a 144Hz panel, but what truly impresses is its performance with 120Hz content, which is crucial for sports and console gaming. We must state with full responsibility that Haier has equipped this television with one of the best VA panels currently available on the market regarding the minimisation of blur. It is rare to encounter an LCD panel that offers such clean, sharp, and ghosting-free motion. In this respect, the M95E is simply phenomenal.

And that is precisely why the unpleasant surprise that awaits us on the software side is so painful. It turns out that this fantastic hardware potential is completely underutilised, as the television practically offers no effective options for improving fluidity. The motion smoothing systems that should assist with lower frame-rate content can indeed be found in the Menu, but they essentially do not respond to our settings. The conclusion is brutally simple: if you intend to watch high-fluidity material, you must be sure that the source is broadcasting it at native 120. In every other case, you must accept a rather raw, stuttering image, as the M95E will do nothing to smooth it out.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

7.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming television, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While it is true that we won’t find support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has ensured several important features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience on consoles. The most important of these are the VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from tearing and keeps it consistent even during sudden drops in frame rate while gaming. In contrast, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the television to the lowest latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be summoned on screen at any time. It allows for a quick preview of the current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

When it comes to features for gamers, the Haier M95E presents some very strong arguments. First of all, it is fully ready for the new generation of consoles and powerful PCs. It is equipped with two full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports, which seamlessly handle 4K signals at 120Hz, and even allow for gameplay at 144Hz. This is the foundation that guarantees us the full use of the potential of our gear. Moreover, the key technologies work flawlessly here. The television flawlessly detects the console and automatically switches to low latency mode (ALLM), so we don’t have to fiddle with the settings. The frame synchronization (VRR) works just as efficiently, eliminating annoying screen tearing when game fluidity slightly drops. Considering the incredibly low motion blur of the panel, which we have already mentioned, the M95E creates a really comfortable and responsive gaming environment. Of course, this is not a perfect package. A dedicated "Game Bar," which is a handy menu for gamers, would be useful, but this is essentially just a nice addition. A more serious failing is the lack of support for the HGiG standard, which complicates the perfect HDR configuration on the console and may lead to overexposures. Despite these shortcomings, the basic "gaming" set that the M95E offers is really solid and fully functional.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
17 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
12 ms
16 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
16 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
20 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

Another advantage for gamers is the very low input lag of around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so small that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's difficult to notice at all. Playing remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with significantly more expensive televisions.

The key parameter for every gamer, often more important than colours or contrast, is responsiveness. In this category, the Haier M95E pulls no punches. The input lag we measured for the 120Hz signal was below 10 milliseconds. This places it among the absolute market leaders, ranking this model on par with dedicated gaming monitors. In practice, this means an instant response to every movement of the controller, keyboard, or mouse.

Compatibility with PC

5.8/10

6.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 Compatibility with PC
Review Haier M95E Compatibility with PC

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming possibilities are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles chroma subsampling 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble rendering fonts cleanly.

As a PC gaming monitor, the M95E performs really well. It has full support for 144Hz, there is VRR, and consequently, it also works with G-Sync. In this regard – excellent. Perhaps that is why our "average" rating in this category surprises you. The reason is simple: while it excels at gaming, its performance for regular text work is not as good. At 120Hz or 144Hz settings, the TV's ability to display text is, frankly, poor. The text is blurry, and the coloured letters are smeared due to a lack of full Chroma 4:4:4 support. Interestingly, there is a solution – simply switch the computer to 60Hz mode and everything returns to normal, with the fonts becoming sharp. The only problem is that it forces us to constantly juggle settings every time we want to stop gaming and do a bit of work.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
70%
76%

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which is directly due to the use of a VA type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just a slight shift to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image to become noticeably worse.

The issue of viewing angles is not surprising here – they are simply poor. The Haier M95E uses a VA type panel, so as you move away from the screen's axis, the image quickly loses colour saturation, and the contrast appears noticeably pale. However, this is a typical and fully expected characteristic of this technology, so it's hard to regard it as a significant disadvantage – this type of panel is just like that.

Daytime performance

3.5/10

8.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review Haier M95E Daytime performance
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review Haier M95E Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Haier M95E: 1039 cd/m2

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

In a sunlit room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all due to the fact that the panel is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin coating of the screen does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not so prominent on the panel, but it is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be rather unclear.

If you are looking for a television for a bright living room, the Haier M95E is one of the stronger contenders. Its performance in daytime conditions is mainly thanks to its very high brightness. In SDR mode, the panel achieves an average of over 1000 nits, which is a result that allows it to easily "break through" the light entering the room, even in very challenging conditions. And although the M95E does not have some revolutionary, super-matte anti-reflective coating, its raw backlight power is more than sufficient to perform excellently as a screen for daytime viewing.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
RTM9.241015.206
Image processor
MT5889 2gb RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Haier M95E TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Haier M95E TV Panel details

Philips PUS7000

Haier M95E

TV features

5/10

3.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    No
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features
Review Haier M95E TV features

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still quite a new operating system and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. Everything functions sluggishly and at times, clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth/RF. This means that we need to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we still could not activate the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting images from Apple devices using the AirPlay function went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very limited application library. The selection is significantly smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programmes is nearly unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 could be a good choice for those who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic programme guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which makes it much easier to operate after dark, and has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting feature is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home cinema systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Classic Features of the M95E

When it comes to the classic features of the television, the M95E is, to put it mildly, disappointing. The only real plus in this category is that we at least get a remote control included, although this too has a rather awkward shape and is not among the most comfortable to use. The real trouble began when we tried to search for terrestrial TV channels – the receiver stubbornly refused to connect to any antenna throughout the testing period. To be sure, we checked the same setup on another television, where everything worked perfectly, which rules out any fault on our part. Overall, apart from the fact that it has Bluetooth and a physical mini-jack headphone output, it's hard to praise the M95E for much here.

Operating System: Google TV

Alright, you might be wondering, what about the Smart features? After all, Google TV is a system that offers remarkable capabilities. That’s true, generally speaking. And indeed, the M95E boasts the same vast library of applications and access to a voice assistant as any other manufacturer. However, this is where the advantages of this system in the tested model come to an end. On our unit, the software simply operated clumsily. We encountered frustrating bugs, and the entire interface regularly experienced slight lags at the most inopportune moments, which effectively discouraged us from using it.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player works quite efficiently and handles most popular video formats without significant issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a hard drive or USB stick should not feel constrained. The only drawback concerns the photo browser - not everything functioned correctly, and some files, especially at selected resolutions, did not open at all.

In such an unpolished and clunky system, we did not expect any positive surprises. However, the built-in USB file player turned out to be a real gem. To our surprise, the application worked smoothly and handled the playback of all the most important formats we threw at it flawlessly. It is one of the few elements of the M95E software that seems to work exactly as it should.

Sound

5.8/10

9.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound quality is distinctly budget-level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programmes, but when it comes to films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. It's hard to expect anything more at this price, so if better experiences are important to us, it's worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even via the headphone output.

After all this enumeration of shortcomings and wasted potential, we move on to a category that is like a breath of fresh air. The sound on the Haier M95E is simply phenomenal. We can confidently state that it is one of the best-sounding televisions to have graced our editorial office this year. The integrated soundbar, proudly positioned at the front, plays really clearly and evenly, serving us distinct dialogues and selective high tones. The real magic also comes from the back of the casing – that’s where two additional subwoofers are located, providing a surprisingly strong and enjoyable bass experience. Of course, we will be realists. We are still talking about the capabilities of the speakers built into the television, and there can be no comparison with a decent external audio system. Nevertheless, as far as integrated solutions go, the M95E sounds really very good and leaves most of the competition far behind.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

87dBC (Max)

75dBC